PHILADELPHIA, JAN. 5, 1834.

Of all the cities of the Union, the peaceful Philadelphia is the most

disturbed by the Bank question, because it is the seat of the mother

bank. The State of Pennsylvania also, of all the States, suffers the

most from the financial crisis, because it is the most deeply in

debt, and is obliged to borrow more, either to finish its canals and

railroads, or to pay the interest on its existing debt. Conceive of

the situation of a State, whose population amounts to only 1,500,000

souls, loaded with a debt of twenty and a half millions, whose ordinary

expenditures are less than 600,000 dollars, but which must raise one

million to pay interest already accrued, and nearly two millions and

a half, for the next summer, under penalty of seeing her great works,

executed at an enormous expense, go to ruin, and who knows not whither

to turn. This is not all; some old loans must be reimbursed next

May, or in three months, and, to crown the whole, the capitalists who

contracted last year for a loan of three millions, to be employed on

the public works, are, in consequence of the present crisis, unable

to fulfil their contracts. The local banks, which are bound by their

charters to lend the State at the rate of 5 per cent., rather stand

in need of assistance themselves. To these public embarrassments is

added the private distress, and thus this country, which Cobbett,

who always shows talent, and occasionally gleams of good sense,

dubs the _Anti-Malthusian_, exhibits for the present the spectacle

of a superabundance of labourers. In the manufacturing districts of

Pennsylvania, many of the operatives are without work.

The condition of the rest of the country is not, in general, any more

favorable. I am very ready to believe that the Anti-Jackson newspapers,

for so they call themselves, exaggerate the distress; but making

all due allowance for rhetorical flourishes, it is still undeniable

that there is much distress, especially among the commercial class.

Bare figures are more eloquent than the best advocates of the Bank,

and it is a notorious fact, that excellent paper has been discounted

at the rate of 18 per cent. per annum, and at even higher rates, in

New York, Philadelphia, and Baltimore. The price currents and the

state of the stock-market, show a general fall in prices of 15, 20,

30, and even 40 per cent. Thus far the efforts of the President to

fell the hydra of the moneyed aristocracy, the Mammoth, the Monster,

have had no other effect than to blast credit and the commercial

prosperity of the country; for the Bank has been administered with so

much ability, especially since the presidency of Mr Biddle, one of

the most distinguished men in the country, that notwithstanding the

abrupt removal of the public deposits, notwithstanding the unexpected

and unfair assaults upon some of the branches, particularly that of

Savannah[M], it is beyond comparison the most solvent and safe of all

the financial institutions in the Union. At this critical moment it

has as much specie (ten millions) as all the other 500 banks taken

together, and I know from good authority, that many Jackson men (this

is the epithet adopted by themselves), have been very glad to be

sprinkled with a few drops of the _venom_ of this dangerous _reptile_.

If what is now taking place in this country were to occur in any

European monarchy, those persons who insist upon all nations having a

government cast in the republican mould, whatever may be the condition

of their territory and population, their wealth and knowledge, their

character and manners, would not fail to make it the text of their

harangues against monarchical governments; holding up to view the

picture of an unparallelled commercial prosperity, checked of a sudden

by the caprice of the sovereign, they would prove that such is one of

the unavoidable consequences of an opposition between the interest of

the ruler and the welfare of the nation; they would demonstrate by

geometrical syllogisms, that it is the essence of monarchy to place

authority in the hands of the weak and the foolish, who, to gratify

their personal malice, would not hesitate to hazard the happiness of

millions. They would raise the cry of secret influence, of intrigue,

which, according to them, is one of the attributes of monarchies.

Unluckily for this theory, it is belied by facts under my own eyes,

in the most thorough and flourishing republic that has ever existed.

The selfishness of royalty, or more correctly speaking of courts, has

hitherto begot much mischief and will continue to do so in future; but

it has met with its match in the bosom of republics, and above all

under a system of _absolute_ equality, which distributes political

power in _absolutely_ equal quantities to the intelligent and the

ignorant, to the most eminent merchant and author, and the brutal

and drunken peasant of Ireland, who is but just enrolled in the list

of citizens. An _absolute_ people, as well as an _absolute_ king,

may reject for a time the lessons of experience and the councils of

wisdom; a people as well as a king, may have its courtiers. A people on

the throne, whose authority is limited by no checks, may blindly and

recklessly espouse the quarrels of the minions of the day; let those

who doubt it come here and see it. Ignorance of the true interests

of the country is not the exclusive prerogative of monarchies. The

official papers of the Federal Executive in the affair of the Bank,

so far as concerns a knowledge of the principles of government and

the springs of the public welfare, are on a level with the measures

of the government of Spain or Rome. And yet this Executive is the

creature of the popular choice in the largest sense. It is not merely

in monarchies, that a dancer is to be seen in the post that belongs

to a mathematician. The camarilla! Never have I heard it so much

talked about, as since I have been in this country. It is here called

the _Kitchen Cabinet_, and admitting a fourth of what is said by

the opposition to be true, it is difficult not to believe that its

influence upon public affairs is greater than that of the ministerial

cabinet.

But to return to the Bank. Congress met on the 3d of December; and most

of the State Legislatures are now in session. Every where, and above

all in Congress, the great, not to say the only question agitated, is

that of the Bank. The subject of the discussions is the removal of the

public deposits, which the President has withdrawn from the Bank after

a military fashion, having previously, in the same spirit, removed from

office the Secretary of the Treasury, Mr Duane, who, although opposed

to the Bank, considered the President's course illegal and rash.

Thus far, the manifestations of public opinion and the deliberative

assemblies are extremely various and discordant. In New Jersey, a small

and unimportant State, the Assembly has adopted, by a large majority,

resolutions approving the acts of the administration, and instructing

its delegates in Congress to support the President; notwithstanding

which, Mr Southard, one of the Senators from that State, has made an

excellent speech on the other side of the question. The Assembly of New

York, the first State in wealth and population, has adopted similar

resolutions by a vote of 118 to 9. Some persons to be sure, assert that

this is because New York would like to have the Mother Bank.[N] The

youthful State of Ohio, whose growth borders on the miraculous (it now

contains eleven hundred thousand inhabitants, although but 50 years

ago it had not six thousand), Ohio, the Benjamin of the democracy, has

strongly expressed the same wishes. The little State of Maine has done

the same. The administration party lately had a brilliant opportunity

of displaying its sympathies and its hatred. The 8th of January, the

anniversary of the battle of New Orleans, was celebrated by innumerable

public dinners, at each of which numerous toasts were drank. President

Jackson was the hero, and the Bank was the scape-goat, of the day. It

would be impossible to imagine the flood of accusations, insults, and

threats, which was poured upon it, mingled with jests in the taste of

the country upon Mr Biddle; thus, at one of these dinners, the Bank was

toasted, as being _governed by Young Nick according to the principles

of Old Nick_.

But the population of New England, particularly that of Massachusetts,

is opposed to the administration. In Virginia the same opinions seems

to prevail, and it is the same with several of the old Southern States.

The merchants and manufacturers of New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore,

Boston, and a hundred other places, have held meetings and adopted

resolutions, strongly censuring the conduct of the government towards

the Bank, and accusing it of having caused the present crisis. Most of

the Philadelphia Banks have petitioned in favor of the Bank. Several

Banks at Boston and in Virginia have refused to take the public money

in deposit; those of Charleston have been unanimous in this measure.

The majority of persons of intelligence, experience, and moderation,

and most of the merchants and manufacturers, are in favour of the Bank.

The country, particularly in the Middle and Western States, and the

operatives in the towns, go for General Jackson.

In Congress the majority of the Senate is friendly to the Bank, and

the majority of the House is on the side of the Administration. The

superiority in debate belongs to the defenders of the Bank. In the

Senate, the three greatest statesmen in the country, Messrs Clay,

Webster, and Calhoun, are on this side of the question, and the

speeches of Messrs Clay and Calhoun have made a strong impression. In

the House Mr Binney, of Philadelphia, and Mr McDuffie have pleaded

the same cause with ability. On the other side there has been more

highflown declamation than reasoning. I have been struck with the

resemblance between most of the speeches and newspaper essays directed

against the Bank, and our republican tirades of 1791 and 1792. There

are the same declamatory tone, the same swollen style, the same appeal

to the popular passions, with this difference, that the allegations

made here are vague, empty, and indefinite, while with us fifty years

ago the grievances were real. Most generally the pictures presented

in these declamations, are fantastical delineations of the moneyed

aristocracy overrunning the country with seduction, corruption, and

slavery in its train; or of Mr Biddle aiming at the crown. Amidst

this swarm of speeches and essays, one hardly ever meets with any

indications of serious study or a tolerable knowledge of the subject;

but I have been struck with the speech of Mr Cambreleng, who has

put forth some prudent suggestions as to the reforms required in

the present system of banking. For it must be confessed, that this

animosity of the President and the body of the people against the Bank

of the United States, blind and unreasonable as it is, is founded on

a real necessity, namely, that of a complete reorganization of the

banking system. When Congress renewed the charter of the Bank of the

United States without modification, in 1832, it committed an error.

It should have seized this opportunity to place the currency of the

country on a more solid basis; and if General Jackson had abode by

the terms of his veto message, in which he declared that he was not

opposed in principle to the establishment of a National Bank, but that

the present Bank could not be retained without some modification, he

might have become the benefactor of his country. He would not, indeed,

have received Cobbett's congratulations, but he would have obtained

the approbation of all statesmen and men of sense in the Old and the

New World. However, whatever his friends may say, as the President did

not foresee the distress, which has befallen American commerce, and as

nobody can doubt his patriotism, we need need not yet despair of seeing

him adopt this wise course.

The present crisis abundantly proves the wretched condition of the

currency, for the original cause of it was quite slight; it was merely

the transfer from the vaults of one bank to those of another of ten

millions, an inconsiderable sum relatively to the amount of the

business of the country. If the local banks, in spite of the control

exercised by the Bank of the United States, had not previously passed

all bounds, they would have been able, when the Bank of the United

States was obliged to contract its discounts by the withdrawing of the

public money, to have enlarged their own in the same proportion, since

those same funds were transferred to their vaults. But the framework of

these banks is so badly put together, that it shakes at the slightest

breath. The slight motion in the political and commercial atmosphere

caused by the President's blow at the Bank, in removing the public

deposits, was enough to make them totter. They are like a colossus with

clay feet, which should have feet of gold, or in other words, specie in

their vaults.

The proportion of metals, of which we have an excess in France, is

here extremely small. In many States, among others New York, there

is an enormous quantity of bills of one, two, and three dollars. In

South Carolina there are 25 cent, and even 12 1-2 cent bills. In

Pennsylvania, Virginia, and some other States, there are none of less

than five dollars. The Bank of the United States emits none of less

than that sum; but this minimum is too low. Most political economists,

and particularly the English, lay it down as an axiom, that the most

perfect money is paper; this is true, if we suppose a nation in which

any disturbance of industry, in consequence or apprehension of war,

from foolish speculations, from glut or panic, is impossible. In such a

land of cockayne, such a terrestrial paradise, an unshaken confidence

would prevail in all transactions, and consolidate all interests. The

metals would only serve to strike medals and to preserve inscriptions

intended to commemorate this ineffable bliss. Paper would there be on a

par with gold, and even higher, as some English writers have maintained

it should be. I do not know if there will ever be a nation in such a

state of heavenly happiness; but I doubt it, because in the world of

finance, as well as in the world of passion, I consider the Tender

River a fable, and pastorals a sport of fancy; but it is very evident

that no such people exists now, or will for some time to come. Now in

the United States, the present banking system, like that of England

from 1797 to 1821, or even 1825, is founded on this theory of the most

perfect money. It is provided, indeed, that the banks shall pay gold

for their paper on demand; but by the side of this clause, which tends

to keep a certain quantity of the metals in the country, is inserted

another, which neutralises it; it is the power of emitting bills in any

number, and of the sum of 1, 2, 3, or 5 dollars. In prosperous times,

the emission of paper is abundant, indefinite; as the necessity of a

metallic standard ceases to be felt, in proportion to the confidence

which prevails, the metals disappear before the excess of paper; there

is scarcely any left in the country. Since I have been in the United

States, I have not seen a piece of gold except in the mint. No sooner

is it struck off, than the gold is exported to Europe and melted down.

When a crisis comes on, the demand for the precious metals increases

rapidly, because every one attaches more value to a positive standard

than to paper, and the later the application of the remedy for the

scarcity of metals, the longer does the crisis last, and the more

serious does it become.

In a new country, where capital cannot, of course, be abundant,

for capital of all kinds, whether of articles of food or precious

metals, is the accumulated produce of labour, it is natural, that the

proportion of paper money should equal and surpass that of metallic

money. The existence of paper money is even a great benefit to any

country. In France we have the enormous sum of 600 million dollars in

specie; (see _Note_ 10, at the end of the volume); in the United States

40 millions are sufficient for all the transactions of a commerce

nearly as extensive as our own. In England the amount of specie at

present does not exceed 220 millions, mostly in gold. Bank notes in

circulation, which constitute the rest of the currency, amount at this

time, in the United States, to 100 million, that is, two and a half

times the amount of specie; in England to about the same as the specie,

which gives for the whole circulation of

The United States, 140 millions--

Of England, 440 millions.

If we had in France the industrial habits of the English and

Anglo-Americans, 200 millions of circulating medium, half in paper

and half in specie, would probably be sufficient for our operations;

but considering our commercial inferiority, suppose that we should

require 300 millions, of which two thirds should be metallic, and one

third paper, it would follow that we might advantageously employ 400

millions, which are now unproductive in the form of specie, and which

add nothing to our pleasures, our comfort, or our industrial capacity.

But if we might expect great benefit from banks of circulation and the

paper which they would issue, it is evident that the Americans, in the

present stage of their wealth, and considering their actual capital,

would find their advantage in putting some check upon themselves in

this matter. It might then be proper to raise the minimum of bills of

the Bank of the United States to 10, 15, or 20 dollars, as in England

there is no paper less than the five pound note. The National Bank, if

it were powerful enough, would keep the local banks in check, and for

this reason it is expedient to increase the capital. There would then

be specie enough in the country for all purposes less than the paper

minimum, and in case of any disturbance, the currency would be less

readily deranged.

Nor is this the only point in which the charter of the Bank of the

United States requires modification; its relations with the Federal

government, as well as with the State governments, need to be modified;

and some projects worthy of consideration, in this view, have been

broached. It would also, probably, be expedient, as Mr Cambreleng has

remarked, to change the rules and regulations relating to private

and public deposits, and to provide that in future they should bear

interest as they do in the Scotch banks. If this system were adopted

by all the American banks, they would gain in solidity, and they would

embrace the interest of all classes, and become provident institutions

for the general good; while at present, their direct profits, the

dividends, fall exclusively to the share-holders, who belong to the

wealthier classes; a fact which contributes not a little to their

unpopularity. Finally, it would be proper to consider to what degree

the immediate advantages of credit might be extended to mechanics and

farmers. In this respect the banks are yet absolutely aristocratical

institutions, the Americans having preserved in banking almost all the

usages of their ancestors, the English. The American banks are now

chiefly devoted to the use of speculators and merchants.

In the midst of so many contradictions, it is difficult to foresee what

will be the issue of the struggle. The friends of the Administration

maintain that President Jackson and Vice President Van Buren are not

only opposed to the Bank as it is, but to any National Bank, and that

they will never yield. The Globe, the avowed organ of the President,

has told Mr Clay, that unless he _can find a Brutus_ (to assassinate

General Jackson,) the Bank will neither have the deposits nor a new

charter. We may doubt, however, whether the President's mind is so

decisively made up, and after all a majority of both houses can set at

nought the _veto_. As to the Vice President, whom his opponents call

the cunning Van Buren, as he aspires to succeed the President, many

persons declare that his object is to gain the vote of the powerful

State of New York, by transferring thither the seat of the Mother Bank,

but that he is too enlightened seriously to wish the destruction of an

institution fraught with so much good to the country.

However this may be, it would be surprising if the present crisis

were not followed, sooner or later, by a reaction in favour of the

Bank of the United States with suitable modifications, or of another

National Bank, which, as Mr Webster observed, would amount to the same

thing, if the share-holders of the present Bank are not sacrificed.

The jealous democracy of this country has this advantage over other

democracies, that in the main it has much good sense; the recollection

of old sufferings caused by the abuses of the banking system, and a

jealousy of all pretensions to superiority, have led it to give ear to

much noisy declamation about the aristocracy of money, particularly

when it has been mixed up with flattery of itself. It may have been

led astray for a moment, when its own prerogatives were the subject of

discussion, as those sovereigns who assert the divine right of kings,

take fire in respect to theirs. Proud of its gigantic labours, it may

have been tempted to believe, that to it everything was possible and

easy, that it had only to frown to cause the Bank to crumble into the

dust at its feet, without being itself shaken by the shock. But facts,

positive, inexorable facts now bear witness that it was mistaken, that

it has trusted too much to its powers and its star, that the agency

of the Bank of the United States is indispensable. The influence of

facts has spread step by step even to the country people, who no longer

find buyers of their produce. The argument is palpable and effectual;

passion cannot long blind men of sense to such facts, for men of sense

are those who do not give themselves up implicitly to abstractions, and

who admit that every theory which is point blank against fact, is false

or incomplete. This is the reason why good sense is worth to the full

as much in politics, as talents.

It is worth while to observe here, that all the political difficulties

in which the United States have become involved, and which have

threatened the existence of the Union itself, have been settled

by means of what are here called compromises, and in France

_justes-milieux_. Thus was ended the serious dispute on the Missouri

question, which had well nigh set the Union in a flame. It was made a

question whether Missouri should be received into the Confederacy with

a constitution sanctioning the institution of slavery. After a long

and ineffectual debate, Mr Clay moved that Missouri should be admitted

unconditionally, but that, at the same time, it should be declared

that in future no new State lying north of 36° 30´ of latitude, should

be admitted into the Union with this institution; this proposition

was received with general favour, and the admission of Missouri was

carried. In the next session, however, a new quarrel arose between

the North and the South, more violent and bitter than the former, in

relation to an article in the constitution of Missouri, prohibiting

any free man of colour from entering the State. Another compromise,

proposed by Mr Clay, finally settled the whole question in 1821, after

it had kept the country in a flame for three years. In 1833, another

compromise was made in respect to the tariff, the honour of which also

belongs to Mr Clay. This question will sooner or later be settled in

the same manner; the Union cannot do without a National Bank, and it

will have one.

There are some lucky persons who succeed in everything, and there are

some lucky nations with whom everything turns out well, even those

events which seemed about to bury them in ruins. The United States

is one of these privileged communities. When Villeroi came back to

Versailles, after his defeat, Louis XIV. said to him, "Marshal, nobody

is lucky at our time of life." Charles V. also, as he grew old, said

that fortune was like a woman, and preferred young men to old ones.

Louis and Charles were right so far as this, that when a man, young or

old, has finished his mission, foresight, ability, and perseverance

profit him little; he fails in whatever he undertakes, whilst he who

has a mission yet to fulfil, takes new strength from the most violent

blows. This is true of nations as well as of individuals. The American

people is a young people, which has a mission to perform; nothing less

than to redeem a world from savage forests, panthers, and bears. It

moves with mighty strides towards its object, for it has not, like

the nations of Europe, the burden of a heavy past on its shoulders.

It may be checked in its career for a time by the present crisis, but

it will come out of it safe and sound, and more healthy than when it

entered it. It will come out with increased resources, with a reformed

banking system, and according to all appearances, even with an improved

National Bank. May the nations of Europe not have to wait long for

institutions, which have so powerfully assisted England and America in

their progress!

Society, Manners and Politics in the United States Being a Series of Letters on North America · 第 77 / 223 题