RAILROAD FROM LONDON TO PARIS.

LONDON, Nov. 1, 1833.

While railroads are talked of at Paris, they are made here. That

from London to Birmingham is already begun; it will be 112 miles in

length, and all the stock, to the amount of 12,000,000 dollars, has

been taken up by subscription; this road will be continued by another

of nearly the same length, from Birmingham to Liverpool, and in five

years Liverpool and London will be only eight hours apart. Whilst

the English capitalists are executing these great undertakings, the

Parisian capitalists look on, but do not stir; they do not even form

projects. Not one of them seems to have seriously considered, that even

in the present state of things, there is more than twice the number of

travellers between Paris and Versailles, than between Liverpool and

Manchester, although the railroad between the last named places has

been opened three years. In London, therefore, they count little upon

the aid of French capitalists in the construction of a railroad from

that city to Paris; they desire it, they would be glad to be able to

go from one capital to the other in fifteen hours, and at trifling

expense; all classes are delighted with the idea of such a thing. But

they feel that such a work is neither expedient nor feasible, without

the joint action of both nations; and as they dare not hope for the

co-operation of France, little is said about it as a serious affair.

Among all the acquisitions, which, since the end of the last century,

have enriched the domain of science, none has opened a wider field than

Volta's discoveries relative to the motion of electricity, and its

development by contact. The phenomena resulting from the two poles

of the Voltaic battery offer an inexhaustible mine to the physical

philosopher; there is no fact in science more general in its nature,

for if any two bodies whatsoever touch each other, they form at once,

by their mutual action and reaction, a Voltaic pile of greater or less

energy. This physical fact has its counterpart in the moral order of

things; if you bring together two men who have hitherto been separated

from each other, in however slight a degree they may have any striking

quality, their friction will certainly produce a spark. If instead of

two men, the two poles of your battery are two nations, the result

is greater in the proportion of a nation to an individual. If these

two nations are England and France, that is to say, the two most

enlightened and most powerful people in the world, this sort of Voltaic

phenomenon then acquires a prodigious intensity; it involves nothing

less than the safety of an old or the creation of a new civilization.

The predominant qualities, good or bad, of France and England, may be

arranged in a series of parallels, the corresponding terms in each

of which will be complements of each other. England is pre-eminent

in affairs, and the qualities which belong to them, coolness,

economy, precision, method, perseverance; taste and genius for the

fine arts, with the enthusiasm, the recklessness, the caprice, the

irregular habits, the wastefulness, at least in time and words, which

characterise the artist, have fallen to the lot of France. On one

side, is reason, cautious and sober, but sure-footed, good sense,

creeping along the ground; on the other, imagination with her brilliant

audacity, but also with her ignorance of things and method, her starts

and trips. Here, an admirable energy in struggling against nature

and metamorphosing the physical features of the globe; there, an

unequalled intellectual activity, and the gift of warming the heart of

mankind with its fires. In England, treasures of industry and heaps

of gold; in France, treasures of thought, wells of science, torrents

of inspiration. In proud Albion, staid, but cheerless manners, reserve

pushed to a chilling excess; in our fair France, easiness of manners

carried to licentiousness, the old Gaulish gaiety, often savoring

somewhat of the camp, a something of the free and easy bordering on the

promiscuous (_un sans-façon expansif qui frise la promiscuité_). On

both sides a large dose of pride; among our neighbors, a calculating,

ambitious pride; the pride of the statesman and the merchant, which

feeds only on power and wealth; which for the country desires

conquests, vast colonies, all the Gibraltars and St. Helenas, eagle's

nests by which all seas and all shores are commanded; and which for

oneself pants for riches, an aristocratic park, a seat in the House

of Lords, a tomb in Westminster Abbey. Amongst us, a vain-glorious

pride, which longs for the unreal, for ideal pleasures; a thirst after

applause for self, after glory for our country; a pride, which, for

France, would be satisfied with the admiration of the world, for self,

with castles in the air, a riband, an epaulet, a line of Béranger as a

funeral oration; the pride of the actor on the stage, of the knight in

the lists. On the north of the Channel, prevail religion and positive

faith; on the south, scepticism, mingled with enthusiasm. There a

deep sentiment of order and respect for rank, combined with a haughty

feeling of the dignity of man; here, a people eager for equality,

excitable, restless, turbulent, yet docile, often even to weakness,

confiding, even to credulity, easily cajoled by its flatterers,

submitting to be trampled under foot like a carcase, during the period

of its lethargy, and at times given over to the most courtier-like

obsequiousness. Among the English the reverence for tradition, among

the French the passion for novelty, predominates; among the former

respect for the law, and obedience to man, on condition that his

supreme rule shall be the law; among the latter, the worship of great

men, and submission to the laws if they are defended by the sword of

Cæsar. On one side the ruler of the seas, on the other the arbiter of

the continent, rousing the world at their pleasure, the one by its

lever of gold, the other by the sound of its voice alone. Surely from

the reciprocal influences of two nations thus constituted and thus

situated on the globe, the most important effects should result, not

only on the general cause of civilization, but on their own mutual

improvement.

The industrial development is not, indeed, the development of the whole

man, but since the beginning of the nineteenth century, no people can

be allowed to reckon itself in the first rank of nations, if it is not

advanced in the industrial career, if it cannot labor and produce. No

people will be powerful that is not rich, and there is now no other way

of growing rich but by work. In regard to production and labor, we have

much to learn from England, and it is a lesson which is to be learned

by the eyes rather than by the ears, by observation better than by

reading. If, then, there were a railroad between London and Paris, the

French, who have now little knowledge of business, would go to London,

where the instinct of method is in the blood, to learn. Our speculators

would go to see how simply, promptly, and plainly great enterprises are

carried on; our shop-keepers and buyers have to learn from England that

to overcharge and to haggle have no connexion with buying and selling

advantageously; our capitalists and merchants, that there can be no

durable commercial prosperity nor security for capital, where there

is no system of credit; they would see the operations of the Bank of

England with its branches and the private banks, and perhaps they might

be incited to bring home, with the needful modification, institutions

and practices so profitable at once to the share holders and to

the public. They would here imbibe the spirit of association, which

in London sweats at every pore.[A] All of us might here see in what

consists and how is realised, that comfort, that care of the person, so

essential to the peace and quiet of one's life, and Paris might perhaps

be led to free itself from the filth of centuries, which formerly

gave it its name, and against which eighteen hundred years later,

Voltaire, whom the ancient monarchy and the faith of our fathers could

not withstand, warred in vain. As we are full of self-love, we should

return from England ashamed of the wretched state of our agriculture,

our roads, and our elementary schools, humbled at the insignificance of

our foreign commerce, and solicitous to vie with our neighbors. I need

not stop to point out what the English might come to seek among us,

they are already converts in this matter, they swarm in Paris, while

it would be easy to count up the Frenchmen who have been in London.

Without saying what the English would get in Paris, I may affirm that

they would leave plenty of sovereigns there. To Paris, the city of

pleasures, the terrestrial paradise of strangers, the railroad would be

a gold mine, and the English, getting familiar with France, would find

profitable investments for their capital among us, which would give

life and energy to useful enterprises.

The railroad from London to Paris would be a commercial enterprise of

the first importance; it would also be a political instrument, a strong

bond of union between England and France. But it is more especially as

a means of education, that it should be most highly recommended, for

there is no fear that the other points of view will be overlooked. The

industrial arts, I said before, are learned chiefly through the eyes;

this is particularly true in regard to the operatives, for in them,

owing to their manner of life, the world of sensation prevails over

the world of ideas. Now the progress of the mechanical arts depends

not less on the workmen than on the foremen and superintendents of

the works; it would be expedient, therefore, to send a certain number

of picked operatives to pass a suitable time in England, just as the

Board of Public Works (_Ponts et Chaussées_) is now in the habit of

sending a few engineers thither. The railroad, by reducing the expense

and trouble of the journey, would probably furnish an opportunity of

despatching companies of artisans selected from among those most worthy

of the privilege. According to the plan of a merchant of Lyons, a

very sensible man, this might be done on a large scale and at little

expense; and he further proposed a system of reciprocity, by which

English workmen should be employed in France and French operatives in

England. It is not impossible that this project may one day be made the

basis of a new law, designed to further the views of our excellent law

of primary education; but the railroad between London and Paris must

first be constructed.

Of the small number of Frenchmen who have visited England,[B] very

few have been led by motives of business. Most have undertaken the

voyage from vague feelings of curiosity, or merely for pleasure; and

the objects of their notice have been the picturesque, the poetical.

They have visited the Gothic ruins of the monasteries and castles,

the cave of Fingal, and the lakes of Scotland, admired the costume of

the Highlanders, the horses and jockeys of the great lords, and the

blooming complexion of the women. They have walked through one or two

parks, visited the hot-houses where all the plants of the world are

collected, braving, behind the glass, the cloudy sky of Great Britain.

They have been through the dockyards and military arsenals, when

they could get leave, under the escort of a sergeant, seen the young

beauties of Almacks and the old curiosities of the Tower, and travelled

over England, just as they would make the tour of Italy or Switzerland.

If the subject of industry has occupied their attention a moment, it

is only in reference to the fashion of some opera decoration. They

have, to be sure, stood amazed at the thousands of vessels whose masts

stretch out of sight along the Thames or in the docks;[C] they have

been delighted with the extent of the great manufacturing towns, the

magnitude of the manufactories, and the height of their chimneys, with

the magical brilliancy of the gas-lights, with the daring bridges of

stone or iron, and with the fantastical appearance of the forge-fires

in the night. But they have never asked, how came England to have

such a vast number of ships, how has she multiplied and extended her

manufactures to such an amazing degree, and how created these towns,

so simple in their architecture, but so fastidiously neat in their

spacious streets; they have not thought to ask the causes of all this

wealth and prosperity.

Yet he who expects to return satisfied from England should visit her

as the Queen of industry; he should see the city rather than Regent's

Park, the East India House rather than Windsor Castle, seek out the

Bank before St. Paul's, the Clearing House before Somerset House,

take more interest in the docks and Commercial House, than in the

armor preserved in the Tower. He should go to the warehouses, the

counting-houses, the workshops, in pursuit of the genius of Great

Britain. He must tear himself from the magnificent hospitality of

the English country seats, and give up his time to the mines and the

forges, which furnish industry with its daily bread, its coal and iron.

(Notes 1 and 2 at the end of the volume.) He must mingle with the stout

and active workmen, quite as much as with the more refined society in

the saloons of the nobility. For myself, I have found nothing in London

which has struck me as more original, and given me greater pleasure,

than a shop in Old Change, whose ware-rooms contain twenty times as

many goods as the largest warehouse in Paris, and whose business

transactions amount to two millions sterling a year, and the great

brewery of Barclay, Perkins & Co. near London Bridge, the order and

arrangement of which are still more striking than its vast extent.

As I stood in this brewery, on a floor on which, distributed in

different rooms, there were ninetynine vats, some of them holding

500,000 or 600,000 bottles, I thought of the famous Heidelberg tun

which I had seen some years ago. It is the only object in a tolerable

state of preservation in the delicious chateau of the Palatine

counts, and it is faithfully visited by all travellers who go to see

that fine ruin, perhaps the finest relic of the feudal times. What a

difference now between the old chateau of Heidelberg with its tun, and

the colossal establishment of the English brewer with its regiment of

tuns! The old castle crumbles to pieces; the rich Gothic sculptures are

wearing away. In vain has a French artist (and, strange coincidence!

that artist himself another relic of the feudal age, an _émigré_, who

with a praiseworthy zeal has been for a long time the self-constituted

guardian of this fine old monument,) in vain has he urged the

government of Baden, to whom the castle belongs, to take some measures

for its preservation. Each year some new dilapidation is caused by the

frosts of winter and the storms of autumn; the old chateau will soon

become a shapeless mass, the very stones will probably be sold, and

nothing will remain, but the drawings of M. de Graimbert, to show what

it has been. The Knights' Hall is stripped of its roof--the arches,

which support the superb terrace whence the eye wanders over the lovely

vale of the Neckar and its beautiful heights,--those arches, rent by

the powder of Louvois,--will some day sink. Meanwhile, the brewery

is enriched one day with a new building, and the next, with a new

steam-engine; and in case of any damage by fire, as recently happened,

the loss is immediately repaired; in the place of the building

destroyed by the flames, rises one more splendid, in which the free use

of iron will be a protection against new ravages.

The statues of the Palatine electors are overthrown in their niches;

no son of their vassals will set them up again; but at the brewery

everything is in perfect order; each tool hangs on its nail, each

kettle is kept well-rubbed and bright. The stables of the noble prince

are a heap of ruins; in the stables of the brewer, rivalling those

of Chantilly, where the great Condé entertained kings, one hundred

and fifty horses, fit steeds for Goliath, are objects of as careful

attention, as those, perhaps, which surrounded the persons of the first

Electors and their gallant knights. The old tun has been empty for a

century and a half; the curious may enter it, and take its measure;

once only has M. de Graimbert seen it spout wine; it was in 1813,

in honour of the emperor Alexander and his allies, the sovereigns

of Austria and Prussia. Even then it was only a pious fraud, the old

tun was not full, the wine flowed from a base barrel which had been

stuck in it the night before. The ninetynine vats of Barclay, Perkins

& Co. are always full of beer; that which is daily drawn off, and

sent all over the United Kingdom and North America, and finds its way

even to the East Indies, would fill the classical tun of the Palatine

Casimir.[D] The secret of this contrast may easily be explained; the

great feudal tun could only be filled by the produce of the feudal

impositions, whilst the vats of the brewery are filled by the voluntary

co-operation of three hundred men, sure of gathering daily the fruits

of their industry; the Heidelberg tun was emptied only to administer

to the pleasures of the prince or his favorites, while the vats of the

brewer quench the thirst of a numerous population, which works hard,

receives good pay, and pays its providers well.

The silence and desolation of the old castle, contrasted with the

bustle and prosperity of the English brewery, are a striking emblem of

the feudal system compared with the modern power of peace and creative

industry. All nations, in proportion as they have the power to change

the warlike qualities of the feudal age into the useful qualities of

the labourer, or as they want the capacity thus to re-cast themselves,

may read their own destiny, either in the state of the flourishing

manufactory, or in that of the deserted and crumbling castle. Happy the

people, who, like France and England, have had strength to shake off

the past, and who, in the quiet enjoyment of their liberties, have only

to concern themselves about the future! Woe to that people, which will

not, or cannot, tear itself away from the past! That people is worn

out; it will die of consumption, and will leave behind nothing but

ruins, poetical, perhaps, but still none the less ruins, that is, death

and desolation: unless indeed a new blood be infused into its veins, or

in other words, unless it be conquered like unhappy Poland.

Society, Manners and Politics in the United States Being a Series of Letters on North America · 第 61 / 223 题