Much depends on the point of view from which a man writes; and I can

only say that, if the distinguished Major-general is right, _from a

purely British point of view_, in depreciating the island and its

resources, he thereby furnishes a _very strong argument why Great

Britain should, for a reasonable compensation, cede this island to the

United States_. I am perfectly sure that the majority of the 200,000

inhabitants would not have the slightest objection to exchange the

Union Jack for the stars and stripes. But I do not think that, in

making this exchange myself, I have abandoned my old English habits of

thought; and so I would mention some reasons why, even if I were still

a fellow-citizen (or should I say subject?) of Major-general Dashwood,

and were as much bound as he is to place the interests of the British

crown above every other interest of my life, I should for that very

reason differ with him in opinion, first of all, from a strategic

point of view. We must not, because my distinguished fellow-citizen,

Captain Mahan, has so brilliantly painted the sea-power of England,

forget also her _man-power_. Most certainly, Viscount Wolseley would

not do so; and I think Major-general Dashwood, from whose interesting

little book, "Chipplequorgan," I have learned that he came with his

regiment to Halifax after the "Trent" affair, will agree with me that

it would then, in case of a war with the United States of America,

have been very convenient if Newfoundland had been peopled by half a

million hardy farmers, woodmen, and miners, in addition to its few

fisher-folk. England has to take undergrown and underfed boys into her

army now; but, if the sturdy Irishmen who have been driven to the

United States by famine and eviction had been provided each with the

"three acres and a cow" of Joseph Chamberlain's speeches in the

valleys of the Humber or Codroy Rivers, surely the experience of

Louisbourg and a hundred well-fought battles since then may tell us

how much more they would have contributed to Britain's honor and

interest than they do now as American voters. The south-western part

of Newfoundland reminds one very much of old Ireland in its climate

and its physical features, and certainly is quite as well fitted to

sustain a sturdy peasantry of small land-owners.

The best answer to the distinguished officer's objections may be found

in the official reports of the geological survey of Newfoundland,

published by Edward Stanford, Charing Cross, London. The present

director of that survey, Mr. James P. Howley, F.R.G.S., has replied in

part to Major-general Dashwood's remarks in a letter written a

fortnight ago, from which I extract a few passages. The Major-general

said at the Royal Geographical Society that the timber of Newfoundland

is all scrub, and fit only for firing. Mr. Howley writes: "Our

lumbering industry is in a most flourishing condition. Ten large

saw-mills are in full swing, besides several smaller ones, around our

northern and western bays. Large shipments of lumber were made last

summer to the English markets. Messrs. Watson & Todd, of Liverpool,

England, purchased 3,000,000 feet of lumber in the island last summer;

and the market quotations in the Liverpool trade journals will be the

best index to the value of the lumber. The Exploits Milling Company

at Botwoodsville purchased $25,000 worth of stores in Montreal to be

used in the winter's lumber-felling operations. They calculate on

cutting 100,000 pine logs. Though the mill has been ten years in

operation, the lumber shows no signs of exhaustion; while the other

and far more abundant products of the Newfoundland forests, such as

fir, spruce, birch, tamarack, etc., have scarcely been touched.

"The Benton Mill, owned by Messrs. Reid, contractors for the Northern

& Western Railroad, though scarcely a year in existence, has put out

3,000,000 feet of first-class lumber."

As to the coal fields, Mr. Howley, referring to his own official

reports for 1889, 1891, and 1892, as published by Stanford, writes:--

In the Bay St. George coal fields 16 distinct seams were discovered,

ranging from a few inches up to several feet in thickness: the Cleary

seam has 26 inches good coal; Juke's seam, 4.6 feet; Murray seam, 5.4

feet; Howley seam, 4.2 feet.

In the Grand Lake carboniferous area 15 distinct seams were

discovered, also ranging from a few inches to several feet. Two seams

on Coal Brook show 2.4 and 3.5 feet. On Aldery Brook, three seams show

2.6 feet, 3.8 feet, and 14 feet of coal. At Kelvin Brook 3 seams

contain 2.6 feet, 3.8 feet, and 7 feet.

Specimens have been submitted to experts in connection with the

Colonial Office, and have been found, in some cases, superior to the

Cape Breton coal. So much for the report of a man who understands his

business, and has had better opportunities than any other living man

of studying the question.

For myself, I may say that during twenty years of travel, in which I

have been from the Gulf of Mexico to Ottawa, and from the Straight

Shore of Avalon to the Muir Glacier of Alaska, I have studied every

State which I have visited with a view to its attractions for British

emigrants, and, before the passing of our present absurd immigration

laws, have been instrumental in transferring many skilled operatives

from the foul slums of Manchester and Salford to the healthy and

pleasant factory villages of New England.

I need hardly say that Newfoundland is not the right place for such

men; but, under a just and wise imperial government, it can be made a

happy home for thousands of hardy Scotch and Irish peasants, who need

not, in crossing the ocean, change their political allegiance. But

England must first do her duty.

She must build her railroad from Port aux Basques along the French

shore to Bonne Bay, or further north, so as to give the people a means

of communication which shall not be impeded by the French treaty

rights; and she must arrange her tariffs so as to defend her fishermen

against the unjust discrimination of foreign bounties. As an American,

I can have no interest in saying these things to Englishmen. If

Major-general Dashwood is right, so much the better for us.

Our Whitneys are awakening new life amid the ruins of Louisbourg,

although the Duke of York and those who followed him as proprietors of

the Sydney coal fields could do so little with them; and so, if

England cannot help Newfoundland, _America can_, and can serve herself

well at the same time. Take the fishing for an instance. The French

bounties do not hurt the Massachusetts fishermen, because we have a

_home_ market which the Frenchmen cannot touch, and seek only a

foreign market for the very small quantity that our own people do not

consume. And to share in this American _home market_ alone would be

more profitable to Newfoundland than all its connection with England

can ever be.

J.F.

* * * * *

End of Project Gutenberg's Newfoundland and the Jingoes, by John Fretwell

Newfoundland and the Jingoes: An Appeal to England's Honor · 第 4 / 4 段