In 1849 Austria withdrew altogether and the King of Prussia was

elected Emperor of Germany, but refused the honor on the ground that

he could not accept the title from the people, but only from his

equals. There followed riots and uprisings of the people in Prussia,

Saxony, Baden, and elsewhere throughout Germany. The Prussian guards

were sent to Dresden to quell the rioting there and took the city

after two days' fighting. The parliament itself was dispersed and

moved to Stuttgart, but there again they were dispersed, and the end

was a flight of the liberals to Switzerland, France, and the United

States. We in America profited by the coming of such valuable citizens

as Carl Schurz and many others. There were driven from Germany, they

and their descendants, many among our most valuable citizens. The

descendant of one of the worthiest of them, Admiral Osterhaus, is one

of the most respected officers in our navy, and will one day command

it, and we could not be in safer hands. In 1849 the German Federal

fleet was sold at auction as useless; Austria was again in the

ascendant and German subjects in Schleswig were handed over to the

Danes.

In 1850 both the King of Prussia and the Emperor of Austria called

congresses, but Prussia finally gave up hers, and the ancient

confederation as of before 1848 met as a diet at Frankfort and from

1851-1858 Bismarck was the Prussian delegate and Austria presided over

the deliberations.

A factor that made for unity among the German states was the

Zollverein. From 1818-1853 under the leadership of Prussia the various

states were persuaded to join in equalizing their tariffs. Between

1834-5 Prussia, Bavaria, Wuertemberg, Saxony, Baden, Hesse-Nassau,

Thuringia, and Frankfort agreed upon a common standard for customs

duties, and a few years later they were joined by Brunswick, Hanover,

and the Mecklenburgs. German industry and commerce had their

beginnings in these agreements. The hundreds of different customs

duties became so exasperating that even jealous little governments

agreed to conform to simpler laws, and probably this commercial

necessity did more to bring about the unity of Germany than the King,

or politics, or the army.

With the struggles of the various states to obtain constitutions we

cannot deal, nor would it add to the understanding of the present

political condition of the German Empire.

Prussia, after riots in Berlin, after promises and delays from the

vacillating King, who one day orders his own troops out of the capital

and his brother, later William I, to England to appease the anger of

the mob, and parades the streets with the colors of the citizens in

revolt wrapped about him; and the next day, surly, obstinate, but ever

orating, holds back from his pledges, finally accepts a constitution

which is probably as little democratic as any in the world.

Of the sixty-five million inhabitants of the German Empire, Prussia

has over forty millions. The Landtag of Prussia is composed of two

chambers, the first called the Herrenhaus, or House of Lords, and the

second the Abgeordnetenhaus, or Chamber of Deputies. This upper house

is made up of the princes of the royal family who are of age; the

descendants of the formerly sovereign families of Hohenzollern-

Hechingen and Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen; chiefs of the princely houses

recognized by the Congress of Vienna; heads of the territorial

nobility formed by the King; representatives of the universities;

burgomasters of towns with more than fifty thousand inhabitants, and

an unlimited number of persons nominated by the King for life or for a

limited period. This upper chamber is a mere drawing-room of the

sovereign's courtiers, though there may be, and as a matter of fact

there are at the present time, representatives even of labor in this

chamber, but in a minority so complete that their actual influence

upon legislation, except in a feeble advisory capacity, amounts to

nothing. In this Herrenhaus, or upper chamber, of Prussia there are at

this writing among the 327 members 3 bankers, 8 representatives of the

industrial and merchant class, and 1 mechanic; 12 in all, or not even

four per cent., to represent the industrial, financial, commercial,

and working classes. Even in the lower chamber, or Abgeordnetenhaus,

there are only 10 merchants, 19 manufacturers, 7 labor

representatives, and 1 bank director, or 37 members who represent the

commercial, manufacturing, and industrial interests in a total

membership of 443.

In the other states of Germany much the same conditions exist. In

Bavaria, in the upper house, or Kammer der Reichsraete, there is no

representative, and in the lower house of 163 members only 29

representatives of the industrial world.

In Saxony, the most socialistic state in Germany, the upper chamber

with 49 members has 5 industrials; the lower chamber with 82 members

has 40 representatives of commercial, industrial, and financial

affairs.

In Wuertemberg, in the upper chamber with 51 members there are 3

industrials; and in the second chamber with 63 members there are 17

industrials.

In Baden, of the 37 members of the upper house there are 6

industrials; of the 73 members of the lower house there are 23

representatives of commerce and industry.

This condition of political inequality is the result of the

maintenance of the old political divisions, despite the fact that in

the last thirty years the whole complexion of the country has changed

radically, due to the rapid increase of the city populations

representing the industrial and commercial progress of a nation that

is now the rival of both the United States and Great Britain. In more

than one instance a town with over 300,000 inhabitants will be

represented in the legislature in the same proportion as a country

population of 30,000. Stettin, for example, with a population of

245,000, which is a seventh of the total population of Pomerania, has

only 6 of the 89 provincial representatives. Further, the three-class

system of voting in Prussia and in the German cities, is a unique

arrangement for giving men the suffrage without either power or

privilege. According to this system every male inhabitant of Prussia

aged twenty-five is entitled to vote in the election of members of the

lower house. The voters, however, are divided into three classes. This

division is made by taking the total amount of the state taxes paid in

each electoral district and dividing it into three equal amounts. The

first third is paid by the highest tax-payers; the second third by the

next highest tax-payers, and the last third by the rest. The first

class consists of a comparatively few wealthy people; it may even

happen that a single individual pays a third of the taxes in a given

district. These three classes then elect the members of an electoral

college, who then elect the member of the house. In Prussia it may be

said roughly that 260,000 wealthy tax-payers elect one-third; 870,000

tax-payers elect one-third, and the other 6,500,000 voters elect one-third

of the members of the electoral college, with the consequence

that the 6,500,000 are not represented at all in the lower house of

Prussia. In order to make this three-class system of voting quite

clear, let us take the case of a city where the same principle may be

seen at work on a smaller scale. In 1910, in the city of Berlin, there

were:

931 voters of the first class paying 27,914,593

marks of the total tax.

32,131 voters of the second class paying

27,908,776 marks of the total tax.

357,345 voters of the third class paying

16,165,501 marks of the total tax.

Roughly the voters in the first class each paid $7,500; those in the

second class $218; those in the third class $11. The 931 voters

elected one-third, 32,131 voters elected one-third, and 357,345

elected one-third of the town councillors. In this same year in Berlin

there were:

521 persons with incomes between $25,000 and $62,500.

139 persons with incomes between $62,500 and $125,000.

22 persons with incomes between $125,000 and $187,500.

19 persons with incomes between $187,000 and $250,000.

19 persons with incomes of $250,000 or more.

Or 720 persons in Berlin in 1912 with incomes

of over $25,000 a year, and they are

practically the governors of the city.

As a result of these divisions according to taxes paid, of the 144

town councillors elected, only 38 were Social-Democrats, though Berlin

is overwhelmingly Social-Democratic, and consequently the affairs of

this city of more than 2,000,000 inhabitants are in the hands of

33,062 persons who elect two-thirds of the town councillors.

In the city of Duesseldorf there were, excluding the suburbs, 62,443

voters at the election for town councillors in 1910. The first class

was composed of 797 voters paying from 1,940 to 264,252 marks of

taxes; 6,645 voters paying from 222 to 1,939 marks; and 55,001 voters

paying 221 marks or less. These 7,442 voters of the first and second

classes were in complete control of the city government by a clear

majority of two-thirds.

It is this three-class system of voting that makes Prussia, and the

Prussian cities as well, impregnable against any assault from the

democratically inclined. In addition to this system, the old electoral

divisions of forty years ago remain unchanged, and consequently the

agricultural east of Prussia, including east and west Prussia,

Brandenburg, Pomerania, Posen, and Silesia, with their large

landholders, return more members to the Prussian lower house than the

much greater population of western industrial Prussia, which includes

Sachsen, Hanover, Westphalia, Schleswig-Holstein, Hohenzollern,

Hessen-Nassau, and the Rhine. Further, the executive government of

Prussia is conducted by a ministry of state, the members of which are

appointed by the King, and hold office at his pleasure, without

control from the Landtag.

How little the people succeeded in extorting from King Frederick

William IV in the way of a constitution may be gathered from this

glimpse of the present political conditions of Prussia.

The local government of Prussia is practically as centralized in a few

hands as the executive government of the state itself. The largest

areas are the provinces, whose chiefs or presidents also are appointed

by the sovereign, and who represent the central government. There are

twelve such provinces in Prussia, ranging in size from the Rhineland

and Brandenburg, with 7,120,519 and 4,093,007 inhabitants

respectively, to Schleswig-Holstein, with 1,619,673.

Each province is divided into two or more government districts, of

which there are thirty-five in all. At the head of each of these

districts is the district president, also appointed by the crown.

In addition there is the Kreis, or Circle, of which there are some

490, with populations varying from 20,000 to 801,000. These circles

are, for all practical purposes, governed by the Landrath, who is

appointed for life by the crown, and who is so fully recognized as the

agent of the central government and not as the servant of the locality

in which he rules, that on one occasion several Landraethe were

summarily dismissed for voting against the government and in

conformity to the wishes of the inhabitants of the circle in which

they lived! Though the Landrath is nominated by the circle assembly

for appointment by the crown, he can be dismissed by his superiors of

the central hierarchy. As his promotion, and his career in fact, is

dependent upon these superiors, he naturally sides with the central

government in all cases of dispute or friction.

Further, and this is important, all officials in Germany are legally

privileged persons. All disputes between individuals and public

authorities in Germany are decided by tribunals quite distinct from

the ordinary courts. These courts are specially constituted, and they

aim at protecting the officials from any personal responsibility for

acts done by them in their official capacity.

In America, and I presume in Great Britain also, any disputes between

public authorities and private individuals are settled in the ordinary

courts of justice, under the rules of the ordinary law of the land.

This super-common-law position of the Prussian official is a fatal

incentive to the aggravating exaggeration of his importance, and to

the indifference of his behavior to the private citizen. There may be

officials who are uninfluenced by this sheltered position, indeed I

know personally many who are, but there is equally no doubt that many

succumb to arrogance and lethargy as a consequence.

How thoroughly Prussia is covered by a network of officialdom, is

further discovered when it is known, that the entire area of Prussia

is some twenty thousand square miles less than that of the State of

California. The whole Prussian doctrine of local self-government, too,

is entirely different from ours. Their idea is that self-government is

the performance by locally elected bodies of the will of the state,

not necessarily of the locality which elects them. Local authorities,

whether elected or not, are supposed to be primarily the agents of the

state, and only secondarily the agents of the particular locality they

serve. In Prussia, all provincial and circle assemblies and communal

councils, may be dissolved by royal decree, hence even these elected

assemblies may only serve their constituencies at the will and

pleasure of the central authority.

It would avail little to go into minute details in describing the

government of Prussia; this slight sketch of the electoral system, and

of the centralization of the government, suffices to show two things

that it is particularly my purpose to make clear. One is the

preponderating influence of Prussia in the empire, due to the

maintenance of power in a single person; and the other is to show how

ridiculously futile it is to refer to Prussia as an example of the

success of social legislation. The state ownership of railroads, old-age

pensions, accident and sickness insurance, and the like are one

thing in Prussia which is a close corporation, and quite another in

any community or country under democratic government. What takes place

in Prussia would certainly not take place in America or in England. To

draw inferences from a state governed as is Prussia, for application

to such democratic communities as America or England, is as valuable

as to argue from the habits of birds, that such and such a treatment

would succeed with fish.

It was with this autocratic Prussia at his back, that the greatest man

Germany has produced, succeeded in bringing about German unity and the

foundation of the German Empire. As the representative of Prussia in

the Diet, as her ambassador to Russia, and to France, he gained the

insight into the European situation which led him to hold as his

political creed, that only by blood and iron, and not by declamations

and resolutions, could Germany be united.

"During the time I was in office," he writes, "I advised three wars,

the Danish, the Bohemian, and the French; but every time I have first

made clear to myself whether the war, if successful, would bring a

prize of victory worth the sacrifices which every war requires, and

which now are so much greater than in the last century. ... I have

never looked at international quarrels which can only be settled by a

national war from the point of view of the Goettingen student code; ...

but I have always considered simply their reaction on the claim of

the German people, in equality with the other great states and powers

of Europe, to lead an autonomous political life, so far as is possible

on the basis of our peculiar national capacity." In 1863 he writes to

von der Goltz, then German ambassador in Paris: "The question is

whether we are a great power or a state in the German federation, and

whether we are conformably to the former quality to be governed by a

monarch, or, as in the latter case would be at any rate admissible, by

professors, district judges, and the gossips of the small towns. The

pursuit of the phantom of popularity in Germany which we have been

carrying on for the last forty years has cost us our position in

Germany and in Europe; and we shall not win this back again by

allowing ourselves to be carried away by the stream in the persuasion

that we are directing its course, but only by standing firmly on our

legs and being, first of all, a great power and a German federal state

afterward."

After Napoleon and the interminable elocutionary squabbles of the

German states, first, for constitutional rights, and, second, for some

basis of unity among themselves, which were the two main streams of

political activity, there were three main steps in the formation of

the now existing empire: first, in 1866, the North German

Confederation under the presidency of Prussia and excluding Austria;

second, the conclusion of treaties, 1866-1867, between the North

German Confederation and the south German states; third, the formal

union of the north and south German states as an empire in 1871.

Although the Holy Roman Empire ceased to exist legally in 1806, it is

to be remembered that as a fiction weighing still upon the imagination

of German politicians, it did not wholly disappear until the war

between Prussia and Austria, for then Prussia fought not only Austria

but Bavaria, Wuertemberg, Saxony, Hanover, Nassau, Baden, and the two

Hesse states, and at Sadowa in Bohemia the war was settled by the

defeat of the Austrians before they could be joined by these allies,

who were disposed of in detail. Frankfort was so harshly treated that

the mayor hanged himself, and the Prussianizing of Hanover has never

been entirely forgiven, and the claimants to the throne in exile are

still the centre of a political party antagonistic to Prussia. The

taking over of north Schleswig, of Hanover, Hesse-Cassel, and Nassau

by Prussia after the Austrian war was according to the rough

arbitrament of conquest. "Our right," replied Bismarck to the just

criticism of this spoliation, "is the right of the German nation to

exist, to breathe, to be united; it is the right and the duty of

Prussia to give the German nation the foundation necessary for its

existence." In taking Alsace-Lorraine from France, Bismarck insisted

that this was a necessary barrier against France and that Germany's

possession of Metz and Strassburg were necessities of the situation

also.

The history of German unity is the biography of Bismarck. Otto Eduard

Leopold von Bismarck was born in Schoenhausen, in that Mark of

Brandenburg which was the cradle of the Prussian monarchy, on the

first of April, 1815. His grandfather fought at Rossbach under the

great Frederick. He was confirmed in Berlin in 1831 by the famous

pastor and theologian, Schleiermacher, and maintained all his life

that without his belief in God he would have found no reason for his

patriotism or for any serious work in life.

He matriculated as a student of law and science at Goettingen in May,

1832, and later at Berlin in 1834. He was a tall, large-limbed, blue-eyed

young giant, the boldest rider, the best swordsman, and the

heartiest drinker of his day. He is still looked upon in Germany as

the typical hero of corps student life, and his pipe, or his Schlaeger,

or his cap, or his Kneipe jacket is preserved as the relic of a saint.

His was not the tepid virtue born of lack of vitality. One has but to

remember Augustine and Origen and Ignatius Loyola, to recall the fact

that the preachers of salvation, the best of them, have generally had

themselves to tame before they mastered the world.

This youth Bismarck must have had some vigorous battles with Bismarck

before he married Johanna Friederika Charlotte Dorothea Eleanore von

Puttkamer, July 28, 1847, much against the wishes of her parents, and

settled down to his life-work. As was said of John Pym, "he thought it

part of a man's religion to see that his country was well governed,"

and his country became his passion. Like most men of intense feeling,

he loved few people and loyally hated many. More men feared and envied

him than liked him. His wife, his sister, his king, a student friend,

Keyserling, and the American, Motley, shared with his country his

affection. Germany might well take it to heart that it was Motley the

American who was of all men dearest to her giant creator. The same

type of American would serve her better to-day than any other, did she

only know it! In 1849 he was elected to the Prussian Chamber. In 1852

a whiff of the old dare-devil got loose, and he fought a duel with

Freiherr von Vincke.

In 1852 he is sent on his first responsible mission to Vienna, and

found there the traditions of the Metternich diplomacy still ruling.

What Napoleon had said of Metternich he no doubt remembered: "Il ment

trop. Il faut mentir quelquefois, mais mentir tout le temps c'est

trop!" for he adopted quite the opposite policy in his own diplomatic

dealings.

In 1855 he became a member of the upper house of Prussia, and in 1859

is sent as minister to St. Petersburg. In May, 1862, he is sent as

minister to Paris, and learns to know, and not greatly to admire, the

third Napoleon and his court.

On the 23d of September, 1862, he is appointed Staats-minister, and a

week later thunders out his famous blood-and-iron speech. On October

the 8th, 1862, he is definitely named Minister President and Minister

for Foreign Affairs.

William I had succeeded his brother as king. He was a soldier and a

believer in the army, and wished to spend more on it, and to lengthen

the time of service with the colors to three years. The legislature

opposed these measures. A minister was needed who could bully the

legislature, and Bismarck was chosen for the task. He spent the

necessary money despite the legislative opposition, pleading that a

legislature that refused to vote necessary supplies had ipso facto

laid down its proper functions, and the king must take over the

responsibilities of government that they declined to exercise. The

cavalry boots were beginning to trample their way to Paris, and to the

crowning of an emperor.

In February, 1864, Prussia and Austria together declare war upon

Denmark over the Schleswig-Holstein succession. They agree to govern

the spoils between them, but fall out over the question of their

respective jurisdiction, and the Prussian army being ready, and the

Moltke plan of campaign worked out, war is declared, and in seven

weeks the Treaty of Prague is signed, in 1866, by which Austria gives

up all her rights in Schleswig-Holstein, and abandons her claim to

take part in the reorganization of Germany. The North German

Confederation is formed to include all lands north of the Main;

Schleswig-Holstein, Hanover, the Hesse states, Nassau, and Frankfurt-am-

Main become part of Prussia; and the south German states agree to remain

neutral, but allies of Prussia in war.

On the 11th of March, 1867, a month after the formation of the

Confederation of the North German States, Bismarck proclaims with

pride in the new Reichstag: "Setzen win Deutschland, so zu sagen, in

den Sattel! Reiten wird es schon koennen!"

October 13th, 1868, Leopold von Sigmaringen, a German prince of the

House of Hohenzollern, is named for the first time as a candidate for

the Spanish throne. Nobody in Germany, or anywhere else, was much more

interested in this candidature, than we are now interested in the

woman's suffrage or the prohibition candidate at home. But France had

looked on with jealous eyes at the vigorous growth and martial

successes of Prussia. It was thought well to attack her and humiliate

her before she became stronger. All France was convinced, too, that

the southern German states would revert to their old love in case of

actual war, and side with the nephew of their former friend, the great

Napoleon. The French ambassador is instructed to force the pace. Not

only must the Prussian King disavow all intention to support the

candidacy of the German prince, but he must be asked to humiliate

himself by binding himself never in the future to push such claims.

Germany and the Germans from an American Point of View · 第 4 / 31 段