The Yellowstone National Park Protection Act

On May 7, 1894, President Cleveland approved an Act "to protect the

birds and animals in Yellowstone National Park, and to punish crimes in

said Park, and for other purposes."

This law, as finally enacted, owed much to the efforts and labor of

members of the Boone and Crockett Club, who for many years had

persistently struggled to induce Congress to pass such necessary

legislation. The final triumph is a matter of congratulation to every

sportsman interested in the protection of game, and fulfills one of the

great objects sought to be attained by the foundation of the Club. While

the statute, in many of its details, could readily be improved, it is

still, in its general features, sufficient to serve the purposes of its

enactment. To those not conversant with the subject, the statement may

seem astonishing, that from the establishment of the Park in 1872 to the

passage of the Act in 1894 no law protecting either the Park, the

animals or the visitors was operative within the Yellowstone Park--a

region containing about 3,500 square miles, and larger than the States

of Delaware and Rhode Island. This condition of affairs was frequently

brought to the notice of the National Legislature, and in 1887 their

attention was called to it by a startling episode. A member of Congress,

Mr. Lacey, of Iowa, was a passenger in a stage which was "held up" in

the Park and robbed. The highwaymen were afterward apprehended, but

escaped the punishment suited to their crime because of the great doubt

existing as to whether any law was applicable. As to game offenses,

regulations were powerless for prevention in the absence of any

penalties by law to enforce them.

The explanation of this anomalous situation is to be sought in the

circumstances under which the Park had been set apart. The eminent

scientists, who interested themselves in this important object, were

surrounded with difficulties. The vastness of the tract proposed to be

included, the question of expense, the selfish interests opposing the

measure, were obstacles not easy to overcome. Congress was told, "Give

us the Park; nothing more is needed than to reserve the land from public

sale or settlement." Doubtless the remoteness and isolation of the

region might have been thought, at the time, sufficient to insure

protection. But it was the wonderful scenery and extraordinary objects

of interest in the Park which were then thought of; the forests and the

game did not enter much into the consideration of the founders. And so

Congress passed the Act of 1872, merely defining the limits of the Park

and committing it to the keeping of the Department of the Interior,

which was empowered to make rules and regulations for its control.

A great work was accomplished when Congress was persuaded to forever

dedicate this marvelous region as a National Park, for the benefit of

the entire country; and it was hoped and expected that Congress would,

in time, supplement the organizing Act by the needful additional

legislation. But this was not to be had for many years to come. For

some time after the year 1872, the reservation was occasionally visited

by a few adventurous spirits or Government parties on exploring

expeditions. During that period it became the refuge of the large game

which had gradually receded from the lower country before the advance of

settlement and railroads. The abundance of game astonished all who

beheld it. Bears, deer, elk, sheep, moose, antelope, buffalo, wolverines

and many other kinds of wild beasts were collected within an area which

afforded peculiar advantages to each and all. Nowhere else could such a

gathering of game be found in one locality. It should be remembered that

those who visited the Park in the early days we have mentioned confined

their investigations to a limited portion of it. The great winter ranges

and breeding grounds were almost unknown. During this period, game

killing was so slight and the supply so great that restrictions, by

those exercising a very uncertain authority in the reservation, were

hardly pretended to be enforced.

But from about the year 1878 the depredations on the game of the Park

attained alarming proportions. The number of visitors had largely

increased. The skin hunter and the record hunter--twin brothers in

iniquity--appeared on the scene, and their number grew from year to

year. It was then that regulations and prohibitions were promulgated

from the Department of the Interior, but they were known to contain only

vain threats, which could be defied with impunity. And so the slaughter

continued, and likewise other depredations. Learned associations,

sportsmen's associations, visitors of all lands, showered petitions upon

Congress to pass some protective law. All that Congress did, however,

was in 1883 to confer authority for the use of troops in the Park. This

was something, and the effect of their presence was very beneficial, and

insured the only protection the Park had until the present time.

Congress seemed affected with an apathy which no appeals could change.

The result was non-action.

Some Congressmen thought they were justified in declining to take any

interest in the matter, because few, if any, of their constituents had

ever visited the Park. Others thought that it should be a Wyoming or

Montana affair, and should be turned over to one or the other of those

then territories. A few seemed to labor under the impression that the

Park was nothing but a private pleasure ground, resorted to by the

wealthy class, and that it was no part of the Constitutional functions

of a Republican Government to afford security to wild animals, or to

incur any expense therefor. These narrow views were not shared by most

of the principal men in Congress; among these we had many staunch

friends, including especially several who held seats in the Senate.

Chief among them was Senator Vest, of Missouri, who at all times was

found ready to do everything in his power to promote the welfare of the

Park. Senator Manderson, of Nebraska, and many others were quite as

willing. It was largely due to the gentlemen we have named that the

Senate, as a body, was imbued with their views, and on all occasions

recognized the important national objects to be attained by the Park,

not only as a great game preserve, but also as a great forest

reservation of the highest economic importance.

With the assistance of some of the present members of the Boone and

Crockett Club, a bill was framed which afforded in its provisions ample

protection to the Park, while it added largely to its area on the south

and on the east, embracing the great breeding grounds of the elk. This

bill was introduced by Senator Vest. But new difficulties now arose,

more serious than any hitherto encountered. By the completion of the

Northern Pacific Railroad a large influx of travel set in toward the

Park. It was now thought money was to be made there. Railroads through

it were talked about. Mines, situated near its northern border, were

said to contain untold wealth, needing only a railroad for their

development. A mining camp, called Cooke City, was started, and it was

urged that a railroad could reach it only by going through the Park.

Corporate influences made themselves felt. The bill introduced by

Senator Vest again and again, in session after session, passed the

Senate. The promoters of a railroad through the Park thought they saw

their opportunity. Afraid to launch their scheme of spoliation before

Congress as an independent measure, they sought to attach it as a rider

to the Park bill. They reasoned that those who desired the passage of

that bill regarded it as so important that they would be willing to

consent to its carrying a railroad rather than see all legislation on

the subject dropped or defeated. The plan was well conceived, but failed

of execution. The friends of the bill recognized that it was wiser to

leave the Park unprotected than to consent to what would be its

destruction. They recognized that, once railroads were allowed within

the Park, it would be a reservation only in name, and that before long

the forests and the game would both disappear. They therefore refused

the bait held out to them by the railroad promoters, who thereafter

always blocked the passage of the Park bill. In return they were always

defeated in their own scheme. The House Committee having the protection

bill in charge never failed to burden it with the railroad right of way

whenever it came to them, blandly ignoring the evident fact that a

railroad was not an appropriate nor a relevant feature to a law for the

protection of the Park. And so it happened that the bill which had been

the child of affection became an object of dread, and was denounced as

bitterly as it had before been advocated by its original friends. It was

thought better to have it die on the calendar than to take the risk of

its adoption by the House of Representatives with the obnoxious

amendment incorporated by the committee.

Apart from that amendment, it was feared the bill would not only

encounter an opposition instigated by pecuniary interests, but might

itself fail to call to its support any counteracting influence. Those

who opposed the railroad, and notably the members of the Boone and

Crockett Club, who invariably appeared before the Public Lands Committee

to argue against it, were at the very least stigmatized as

"sentimentalists," who impeded material progress--as busybodies, who,

needing nothing themselves, interfered to prevent other people from

obtaining what was necessary and beneficial to commerce. With practical

legislators such animadversions are frequently not lacking in force, for

nothing more incurs their contempt than a measure which has not what

they call a _practical object_, by which they mean a _moneyed object_.

While throughout the country there was considerable general interest

taken in the preservation of the Park, such influence was not

sufficiently concentrated to make itself felt by Congress. The Park was

everybody's affair, and in the House of Representatives no one could be

found to take any special interest in it. And so the fight went on from

year to year. In Congress after Congress the bill was passed in the

Senate, and emerged from the House Committee on Public Lands weighted

down by the burden of the railroad. Secretary after Secretary of the

Interior protested against this feature of the bill, and so did every

officer of the Government who had any part in the administration or

exploration of the Park. But their protests were without effect on the

committee, which in those days seemed to regard the railroad as the most

important feature of the bill.

It was clearly shown that the railroad would not only be most harmful to

the Park, but could serve no useful purpose; for it was quite possible

for a railroad to reach the mines without touching the Park, whereas the

projected route cut through the Park for a distance of some fifty miles.

The public press throughout the country was almost unanimous in

denouncing the threatened invasion of the reservation. But the railroad

in interest had a strong lobby at work, and many of the inhabitants in

the territories and States nearest the Park showed the most selfish

indifference to its preservation, and a greedy desire to plunder it. The

railroad lobbyists were very active. They saw the necessity of trying to

avoid openly outraging public opinion. Accordingly they changed the

bill, so that, instead of conferring a right of way through the Park, it

segregated and threw out of the reservation that portion through which

the railroad was to go. This was supposed to be a concession to public

sentiment; but it must have been thought that the public were very

easily deceived, for there was really no concession at all, save to the

railroad interests. Instead of a _right of way_ through a portion of the

Park, they now asked, and were offered by the committee, the land

itself. The Committee of the House proposed that this land should be

thrown out of the Park, and any and all railroads be allowed to scramble

for it. The area thus doomed is situated north of the Yellowstone River,

and constitutes one of the most attractive portions of the Park. It

includes the only great winter range of the elk. In the winter there can

be seen there some 5,000 animals, and no one who has traveled over this

region in summer has failed to observe the enormous number of shed

horns, showing how extensively the range is resorted to by this noble

animal. Here too can be found a large band of antelope at all times,

numbering about 500, and a smaller, but considerable, band of mountain

sheep.

The friends of the Park succeeded in stopping the proposed railroad

legislation, but they could accomplish nothing else in Congress. They

had more success with another branch of the Government. There was a

statute authorizing the President to set apart any part of the public

domain as a forest reservation. Taking advantage of this, certain

members of the Boone and Crockett Club saw an opportunity of

substantially obtaining the enlargement of the Park which they had been

vainly endeavoring to obtain from Congress. They laid the matter before

General Noble, then Secretary of the Interior. He recommended to

President Harrison that the tract in question should be constituted a

forest reserve. This was done. In 1891 the President issued a

proclamation, establishing the Yellowstone Park Forest Reserve. It

embraced some 1,800 square miles, abutting on the east and south

boundaries of the Park. The Secretary afterward had the same regulations

extended to the Reserve as had been put in operation in the Park. This

important action was followed by further proclamations, instituting

other forest reservations in different sections of the country. The

Executive and its representative, the Department of the Interior, have

at all times been most sympathetic and helpful in the movement for

forest and game preservation. They have sternly resisted all assaults

upon the Park.

The organization of the Boone and Crockett Club had been a great step

toward Park protection. Its membership included those who had shown most

interest in obtaining legislation. One of the main objects of the

society was the preservation of the game and the forests. It brought

together a body of men whose motives were entirely disinterested, and

who were able to make their influence felt. To their efforts must be

largely attributed the success which was ultimately attained. But that

success might have been indefinitely deferred had not Congress been

awakened to its duty by an event as shocking as it was unlooked for.

For years one of the cherished objects of the Park had been the

preservation of perhaps the only surviving band of buffalo. It had

sought refuge in the mountains. It was known to be on the increase and

it was supposed that it would remain unmolested. Its number had been

estimated as high as 500. Its habitat was a wild and rugged country,

affording a seemingly secure asylum. For a long time these buffalo

remained comparatively safe. In the summer it would have been of no use

to slaughter them for their heads and hides. In the winter the snow was

so deep and their haunts so remote as to render it well nigh impossible

to pack heads or hides out to a market. But a desperate man was found to

take desperate chances. The trouble came to the Park from the mining

camp of Cooke. A notorious poacher named Howell made it his

headquarters. Its proximity to the northeast boundary of the Park made

it a convenient point from which to conduct his raids and to which he

might convey his booty. If he killed even a single buffalo, and safely

packed out of the Park its head or hide, he was sure of realizing a

large sum. If he was captured while making the attempt, he knew he was

safe from punishment, and that there was no penalty, even if there was

an offense. A less lawless man might have indulged a flexible conscience

with the idea that, as there was no punishment, there was no crime. A

similar view of ethics had been indulged in by a prominent member of the

gospel, who had killed game in the Park, and sought extenuation on the

ground that he had not violated any law. But Howell was not a man who

sought to justify his actions; it was sufficient for him that he

incurred no risk. The time he selected for his deed of destruction he

thought the most propitious for covering up his tracks. His operations

were conducted in the most tempestuous weather in that most tempestuous

month, March, in the year 1894. The snow then was deepest, and Howell

felt there would be little chance of interference by scouting or other

parties. Eluding the guard stationed in the northern portion of the

Park, on stormy nights, he stole into the Park and built a lodge in the

locality where the buffalo wintered. In it he stored his supplies, which

he had conveyed on a toboggan. He traveled on _skis_, the Norwegian

snowshoes, ten feet long, which are generally used in the Northwestern

country. This enabled him to traverse the roughest mountain range with

ease and great rapidity, even in the deepest snow. Once established, the

killing was an easy matter. He had only to find the buffalo where the

snow was deep. The ponderous, unwieldy animals had small chance of

escape from his pursuit. His quarry was soon located, and he needed no

assistance to make a surround; for, while the frightened, confused

beasts were plunging in the snow, in a vain attempt to extricate

themselves, the butcher glided swiftly around them on his snowshoes,

approaching as close as he chose. With his rapid-firing gun he

slaughtered them as easily as if they had been cattle in a corral. How

many he killed will never be known. The remains of many of his victims

will never be found.

[Illustration: IN YELLOWSTONE PARK SNOWS.]

But while the ruffian was busiest in his bloody work, a man was speeding

over the snow toward him from the south. He too was on _skis_. He too

was a mountain man, who thought as little of the obstacles before him as

Howell did. But the object of his trip was not the buffalo, but Howell.

It was human game he was pursuing. Howell had not covered up his tracks

as well as he thought. The trailer had struck a trail which he never

left till it brought him to the object of his pursuit. This man was

Burgess, the Yellowstone Park scout. He had learned of Howell's presence

in the Park, and was sent out, with the intention of apprehending him,

by the energetic superintendent, Captain Anderson. He proceeded on his

course as swiftly as a howling wind would permit, when he was surprised

by seeing suspended from some trees six buffalo scalps. He now felt that

he was in close vicinity to the man he was hunting, and that his

business had become a serious one. He knew the man who had done that

deed was prepared to resist and commit a greater crime. But this did not

deter him and he again took the trail. He had proceeded only a short

distance when he heard six shots. Hastening up a hill, he saw Howell

engaged in butchering five buffalo, the victims of the six shots.

Howell's gun was resting on the body of one of the slain animals, a few

feet away from where he was engaged in removing a scalp from another of

the bison. So occupied was he in his work that he did not perceive the

scout, who had emerged in plain view, and who silently glided to the

weapon, and, securing it, had Howell at his mercy. The demand to throw

up his hands was the first intimation Howell had that he was not alone

in the buffalo country. It must have been difficult for the scout at

that moment not to forget that ours is a Government of law, and to

refrain from making as summary an end of Howell as Howell had made of

the buffalo.

The poacher accepted his capture with equanimity, casually remarking

that if he had seen Burgess first he never would have been captured. He

was conveyed to the post headquarters. As soon as the Secretary of the

Interior heard of his arrest, he ordered his discharge, as there was no

law by which he could be detained or otherwise punished. Howell was

proud of his achievement and of the notoriety it gave him, boasting

that he had killed altogether eighty of the bison. This statement may

only have been made for the purpose of magnifying his crime and so

enhancing his importance. It may, however, be true. Besides those

actually known to have been slaughtered by him, the remains of thirteen

other bison, it is said, have been found in the Park. It is probable

they were all killed by him.

When the intelligence of what had happened reached the country, much

indignation was manifested. The public, which after all did have a vague

sense of pride in the Park, and a rather loose wish to see it cared for,

was shocked and surprised to discover that no law existed by which the

offense could be reached. They were aroused to the knowledge that the

Park was the only portion of our domain uncontrolled by law. The Boone

and Crockett Club took prompt advantage of this awakened feeling, and

redoubled its efforts to secure action by the National Legislature.

Congress had long been deaf to the appeals of the few individuals who,

year after year, endeavored to obtain a law; but now, at last, they

realized that some action was really needed if they desired to save

anything in the Park. Mr. Lacey, of Iowa, the gentleman whom we have

mentioned as having had a practical experience of the condition of

affairs in the Park, was naturally the first to take hold of the

opportunity which public opinion afforded. He willingly adopted the

chief jurisdictional and police features contained in the Park bill to

which we have so frequently referred as repeatedly passing the Senate.

He readily acquiesced in all the amendments which were proposed by

members of the Boone and Crockett Club. The Club pushed the matter

vigorously. The aid of many prominent members of the House of

Representatives was enlisted. Before the hostile railroad party knew of

the movement, the bill was presented to the House, unanimous consent for

its consideration obtained, and it was passed. In the Senate the bill

was among its friends, and Senator Vest was again instrumental in

securing its passage. The promoters of the railroad scheme thought it

more prudent not to meddle with the bill in the Senate, as they would

have been certain to have encountered defeat.

The Act provides penalties and the means of enforcing them, and thus

secures adequate protection. It makes the violation of any rule or

regulation of the Secretary of the Interior a misdemeanor. It prohibits

the killing or capture of game, or the taking of fish in an unlawful

manner. It forbids transportation of game, and for the violation of the

Act or regulations it imposes a fine not to exceed $1,000, or

imprisonment not to exceed two years, or both. It also confiscates the

traps, guns and means of transport of persons engaged in killing or

capturing game. Finally a local magistrate is appointed, with

jurisdiction to try all offenders violating the law governing the Park,

and it specifies the jurisdiction over felonies committed in the Park.

By a happy coincidence the new system was inaugurated by the trial and

conviction of the first offender put on trial, and it was Howell who was

the first prisoner in the dock. He had returned to the Park after the

passage of the law, and was tried and convicted of violating the order

of the Secretary of the Interior, by which he was expelled after he had

slaughtered the buffalo. This was retributive justice indeed. The Club

had desired that the law should be extended by Congress over the

Yellowstone Park Forest Reserve, but legal difficulties were

encountered, so that this protection had to be deferred. It is to be

hoped that in the near future this important adjunct to the Park may

have the same law applied to it.

The Park is now on a solid foundation, and all that is necessary for its

future welfare is the prevention of adverse legislation cutting down its

limits or authorizing railroads within it. In the winter of 1894-95 the

railroad scheme, now disguised under the form of a bill to regulate the

boundaries of the Park, came up again. This was the old segregation

plan. It aimed not only to cut off from the Park that valuable portion

already described, and embracing 367 square miles north of the

Yellowstone, but also to make extensive cuts in the Forest Reserve for

railroad and other purposes, amounting to 640 square miles. This

spoliation was not permitted. Congress seemed at last to be determined

to support the Park intact, and the Committee of the Fifty-fourth

Congress in the House having the Park legislation in charge manifested

this disposition by adverse reports on all the bills to authorize

railroads and on the segregation bill as well.

The present boundaries only need marking on the ground--a mere matter of

departmental action. There is no need of legislation on the subject. The

boundaries, especially on the north, afford such natural features as

constitute the best possible barrier to prevent depredation from

without, and to insure the retention of the game within, the Park.

Notwithstanding the inadequacy of the protection in former years, the

game has increased largely, especially since the military occupation.

Competent authority has estimated the number of elk as high as 20,000,

though this is probably too large a figure. Moose are frequently

encountered. Mountain sheep and antelope are found in goodly numbers. It

is doubtful now whether there are over 200 buffalo left. Bears of the

different varieties are very plentiful and deer are also quite abundant.

The animals thoroughly appreciate their security. They have largely lost

their fear of man. Antelope and sheep can be seen in the vicinity of the

stage roads, and are not disturbed by constant travel. Wild geese, ducks

and other birds refuse to rise from the water near which men pass.

But bears show the most indifference for human presence. Attracted by

the food obtained, they frequent the neighborhood of the hotels in the

Park. The writer of these notes, together with some companions, had a

good opportunity, in the latter part of August, 1894, to observe how

bold and careless these generally wary animals may become if not hunted.

When we reached the Lake Hotel, the clerk asked us if we wished to see a

bear, as he could show us one after we had finished dinner. We went with

him to a spot some 200 feet back of the hotel, where refuse was

deposited. It was then a little after sunset. We waited some moments,

when the clerk, taking his watch out of his pocket said, "It is strange

he has not come down; he is now a little overdue." Before he had

replaced his watch, he exclaimed, "Here he comes now," and we saw

descending slowly from a hill close by a very large black bear. The bear

approached us, when I said to the clerk, "Had not we better get behind

the timber? He will be frightened off should he see us." He answered,

"No, he will not be frightened in the least," and continued to converse

with us in a loud voice. We were then standing in the open close by a

swill heap and the bear was coming toward us, there being no timber

intervening. We did not move, but continued talking. The bear came up to

us without hesitation, diverging slightly from his direct route to the

swill heap so as to approach nearer to where we were. He surveyed us

leisurely, with his nose in the air, got our scent, and, seeming content

that we were only harmless human beings, turned slowly away and went to

the refuse, where he proceeded to make a meal. We watched him for quite

a while, when a large wagon passing along the road nigh to where we

stood, the bear stopped feeding and turned toward the hotel in the

direction in which the wagon was traveling. Our guide exclaimed, "He has

gone to visit the pig sty," and in a little while we were satisfied this

was so by hearing a loud outcry of "b'ar, b'ar," which we afterward

found proceeded from a Chinaman, one of whose special duties it was to

keep bears out of the pig sty.

[Illustration: ON THE SHORE OF YELLOWSTONE LAKE.]

After the departure of the black bear we retraced our steps, but before

getting to the hotel I suggested to one of my companions, Del. Hay, that

if we returned to the refuse pile we might see another bear. We

accordingly went back on the trail to within a few yards of where we

stood before. When we stopped we heard, in the timber near by, a great

noise, as if dead pine branches were being smashed, and there emerged

into the open a large grizzly. Although he was not quite so familiar as

the black bear, he showed no hesitation, but walked straight toward us

and the object of his visit--the swill. Before reaching his

destination, however, he stopped and squatted on his haunches, calmly

surveying the scene before him. The reason why he stopped became at once

apparent. From the same hill down which the black bear had come we saw

another grizzly, larger than the first, moving toward us at a rapid

gait, in fact, on a lope, while the first grizzly regarded him with a

look not altogether friendly or cordial. The second bear did not stop an

instant until he reached the swill heap, where he proceeded to devour

everything in sight, without any regard to us or to his fellow squatted

near by. The latter apparently had had some experience on a former

occasion which he was not desirous of repeating.

Three men coming through the timber toward us made a considerable

racket, and the two bears moved off at no rapid gait in opposite

directions; but they went only a short way. Until we left the spot we

could see them on the edge of the timber, looking toward us, and, no

doubt, waiting for more quiet before partaking of the delights before

them. It was not easy to realize the scene before us was actual. The dim

twilight, the huge forms of the bears pacing to and fro through the

whitened dead timber, made it appear the creation of a disordered fancy.

It did not seem natural to be in close proximity with animals esteemed

so ferocious, at liberty in their native wilds, with no desire to attack

them and with no disposition on their part to attack us. When the three

men joined us and were talking about the bears, one of them shouted,

"Here come two more," and before we could realize it we saw two

good-sized cinnamons at the feast. They paid no attention whatever to

us, but were entirely absorbed in finishing up what the other bears had

left. By this time it was fast becoming dark and we returned to the

hotel. I should have said that we measured the distance from the nearest

point from the black bear to where we stood, and found it to be exactly

twenty-one feet. The other bears were but a few yards further.

When we returned to the house we entertained our friends with an account

of what we had seen, and had there not been many eye-witnesses we

probably would have been entirely disbelieved.[14] As we were narrating

our story a man came into the room and said, "If you want some fun, come

outside; we have a bear up a tree." We went outside of the hotel, and

not over forty feet from it found a black bear in a pine tree. It seems

that the wagon, already mentioned, had been stopped at the pine tree and

the horses had been taken out. The owner, returning to his wagon, found

the bear in it, and this was the explanation why the bear had so

suddenly taken to the tree.

[14] Colonel John Hay, of Washington, was one of the spectators of

this curious scene. Captain Albrecht Heese, of the German Embassy,

tells us that in July, 1895, while stopping at the Lake Hotel, he saw

a very large bear eating out of a trough in the daytime while a number

of tourists were present; and that the bear was finally chased away

from the trough by a cow. At the Upper Geyser Basin a bear was

domiciled in the hotel; it took food from the hands of the hotel

keeper, following him around like a dog.

The animal was considerably smaller than the one we had seen earlier; in

fact, it was not more than half as large, but still full grown. Quite a

number of packers and teamsters stood about, amusing themselves by

making the bear climb higher, till at last one of them asked our driver,

Jim McMasters, why he did not climb the tree and shake the bear out. It

was quite dark, and McMasters replied that he would not mind doing so if

there were enough daylight for him to see. His companions continuing to

banter him, he finally said, "I believe I'll go up anyhow," and up he

went, climbing, however--instead of the tree the bear had ascended--a

companion tree which grew alongside of the other, the trunks of the two

not being more than a foot or so apart and the branches interlaced. We

soon lost sight of McMasters and of the bear also; for, as Jim climbed

the bear would climb too, until at last they both had reached the top of

their respective perches, when we heard Jim cry out, "Boys, he's got to

come down; I can reach him." With that he proceeded to break off a small

branch of his tree, and we could hear him whack the bear with it, and

also could hear the bear remonstrating with a very unpleasant voice, at

times approaching a roar. But at last the bear seemed to have made up

his mind that it was better to come down than stay up and be whacked

with a pine branch, so down he came, but not with any great rapidity,

stopping at every resting place, until Jim came down too and gave him a

little persuading.

We could now see the action, but its dangerous features were lost sight

of in its amusing ones. Jim had climbed into the tree down which the

bear was descending, and when he was not persuading the bear he was

pleading with us somewhat as follows: "Now, boys, don't throw up here,

and don't none of you hit him until he gets down. If he should make up

his mind to come up again he'd clean me out, sure." After each speech of

this sort he would move down to where the bear was and apply his branch,

whereupon both the man and the animal would descend a few pegs lower.

At last the bear was almost near the ground. We all formed a circle

around the tree, prepared to give both man and beast a reception when

they should alight. The beast came first, and every fellow who had

anything in the way of wood in his hand gave the bear a blow or two as a

warning not to return to the wagon again. Bruin made off into the timber

with great precipitancy. Jim, when he got down, did not seem to think

that he had done anything more than if the bear had been a "possum,"

which he had shaken out of the tree.

Head-Measurements of the Trophies at the Madison Square Garden

Sportsmen's Exhibition

During the week beginning May 14, 1895, there was held in Madison Square

Garden, New York, a Sportsmen's Exhibition. There was a fair exhibit of

heads, horns and skins, for which the credit largely belongs to

Frederick S. Webster, the taxidermist.

At the request of the managers of the Exhibition, three of the members

of the Boone and Crockett Club--Messrs. Theodore Roosevelt, George Bird

Grinnell and Archibald Rogers--were appointed a Committee on

Measurements. There were heads and skins of every kind of North American

big game. Many of them were exhibited by amateur sportsmen, including

various members of the Boone and Crockett Club, while many others were

exhibited by furriers and taxidermists.

Some of the measurements are worth recording. For convenience we

tabulate, in the case of each animal, the measurements of the specimens

exhibited by amateur sportsmen who themselves shot the animals. For

purposes of comparison we add the measurements of a few big heads

exhibited by taxidermists or furriers; also for purposes of comparison

we quote the figures given in two works published with special

reference to the question of horn measurements. One is the "Catalogue

and Notes of the American Hunting Trophies Exhibition" at London in

1887. The moving spirit in this exhibition was Mr. E. M. Buxton, who was

assisted by all the most noted English sportsmen who had shot in

America. The result was a noteworthy collection of trophies, almost all

of which belonged to animals shot by the exhibitors themselves. Very few

Americans took part in the exhibition, though several did so, one of the

two finest moose heads being exhibited by an American sportsman.

The other big game book quoted is Rowland Ward's "Measurements,"

published in London in 1892. This is a very valuable compilation of

authentic records of horn measurements gathered from many different

sources. In many cases it quotes from Mr. Buxton's catalogue. The

largest elk head, for instance, given by Ward is the one mentioned in

the Buxton catalogue. But in most instances the top measurements given

by Ward stand above the top measurements given in the catalogue, because

the latter, as already said, contains only a record of the trophies of

amateur sportsmen, whereas many of Ward's best measurements are from

museum specimens, or from picked heads obtained from furriers or

taxidermists, who chose the best out of those presented by many hundreds

of professional hunters.

At the Madison Square exhibition there were numerous bear skins, polar,

grizzly and black, submitted by men who had shot them. There were a few

wolf and cougar skins and one peccary head; but there was no

satisfactory way of making measurements of any of these. The peccary's

head, which was submitted by Mr. Roosevelt, of course, had the tusks in

the skull, so that it was not possible to measure them; for the same

reason it was not possible to measure the skulls which were in the heads

of the bear, wolf and cougar skins exhibited by Mr. Roosevelt.

There were few Oregon blacktail deer heads exhibited, and these were not

large. The one exhibited by Mr. Roosevelt, for instance, had horns 21

inches in length, 4 inches in girth and 17 inches in spread.

In measuring most horns it is comparatively easy to get some relative

idea of the size of the heads by giving simply the girth and length. The

spread is often given also; but this is not a good measurement, as a

rule, because, in mounting the head, it is very easy to increase the

spread; and, moreover, even where the spread is natural, it may be

excessive and out of proportion to the length of the horns, in which

case it amounts to a deformity. The length is in every case measured

from the butt to the tip along the outside curve of the horn. The girth

is given at the butt in the case of buffalo, sheep, goat and antelope;

but in the case of deer it is given at the narrowest part of the horn,

above the first tine; in elk this narrowest part comes between the bay

and tray points; in blacktail and whitetail deer it comes above the

"dog-killer" points, and below the main fork in the horn. Even in the

case of elk, deer, sheep and buffalo the measurements of length and

girth do not always indicate how fine a head is, although they generally

give at least an approximate idea. The symmetry of the head cannot be

indicated by these measurements. In elk and deer heads, extra points,

though sometimes mere deformities, yet when large and symmetrical add

greatly to the appearance and value of the head, making it heavier and

grander in every way, and being a proof of great strength and vitality

of the animal and of the horn itself. In consequence, although the

measurements of length and girth generally afford a good test of the

relative worth of buffalo, elk, sheep and deer heads, it is not by any

means an infallible test.

With moose and caribou heads the test of mere length and girth is of far

less value; for many of them have such extraordinary antlers that the

measurements of length and girth mean but little, and give hardly any

idea of the weight and beauty of the antlers. With moose a better idea

of these qualities can be obtained by measuring the extreme breadth of

the palmation, and the extreme length from the tip of the brow point

backward in each horn. Caribou horns are often of such fantastic shape

that the actual measurements, taken in any ordinary way, give but a very

imperfect idea of the value of the trophies. Very long horns are sure to

be fine specimens, and yet they may not be nearly as fine as those which

are much shorter, but more branched, and with the branches longer,

broader and heavier, and at the same time more beautiful. Thus, at the

Madison Square Garden, C. G. Gunther's Sons, the furriers, exhibited one

caribou with antlers 50 inches long, of the barren ground type, with 43

points. These horns were very slender, and would not have weighed more

than a third as much as an enormous pair belonging to a woodland

caribou, which were some 10 inches shorter in extreme length, and with

rather fewer points, but were more massive in every way, the beam being

far larger, and all of the tines being palmated to a really

extraordinary extent.

_TABULATED SERIES_

With name of owner, and locality and date of capture.

Hunting in Many Lands: The Book of the Boone and Crockett Club · 第 26 / 45 题