VI.

What will be the effects produced by this expansion of gold on those

countries where the discoveries and working have occurred, and on the

great centres of wealth and industry, where competition is in active

operation, and where the gold may, when in the shape of coin, fix a new

value on commodities? First, as regards the gold-producing countries

themselves. It is clear that the attraction to the “diggings” must

retard, if not put a temporary stop, to really productive labour, that

of the cultivation of the land: but this demoralizing influence may

not be of long duration. The “placers” will become exhausted, the gold

of alluvial deposit, that which the rains and other causes have spread

over the surface of the soil, has hitherto been the chief feeder of

the supply. The thousands of miners working at the various sources,

and turning over and over again every part of the surface, will soon

have picked out every particle of the metal. The remainder of the gold

must then be sought for in the quartz; whence it can be obtained only

by the aid of scientific processes, and effectually extracted only

by the application of capital: which is hardly likely to be supplied

to an adequate extent, excepting by companies, in the same way as

has been the case in the working of silver mines. Then individual

enterprize will be again directed to the cultivation of the soil. Out

of the crowds of emigrants in Australia and California, now attracted

to the “diggings,” the number required for agricultural purposes will

no longer be deficient. Amongst the adventurers who are expatriating

themselves to seek fortunes in new countries, there will be numbers

of poor families who will consider themselves adequately repaid by

being able to obtain in a distant land, a fair remuneration for their

services, and the ownership of land, with the means of a comfortable

livelihood.

The Spaniards, in the early days of conquest in South America, began

by abandoning all other pursuits than the search of gold and silver;

they ended however, by building cities, forming harbours, constructing

churches, planting the land, and rearing flocks. After the soldiers

came the miners, after the miners came the colonists: swords were

turned into plough-shares. That which occurred in the 17th century

will recur in the 19th. Australia, California, and the colder regions

of the Altai, will be covered with people. It may readily be believed

that Providence, in the accumulation of treasures like loadstones in

the hearts of the mountains and in the depths of the valleys, has

contemplated the attraction of a superabundant population, and of the

genius of colonization throughout the civilized world.

Thus much for the producing country itself. Let us now consider the

effect of this superabundance of gold on the importing countries. The

first and most important question is, whether the relative proportions

in value between gold and silver is likely to be materially disturbed.

We have been considering the present production of gold, let us now see

how the case stands as regards silver.

Mons. de Humboldt estimates the amount of silver annually produced

at the commencement of this century at 870,000 kilogrammes (about

[139]193,000,000 francs). In 1847, M. Michel Chevalier, considered the

annual production to be 775,000 kilogrammes, (about [140]172,000,000

francs), but there is reason to suppose that this writer

under-estimated the returns of the Mexican mines, which he placed at

[141]18,500,000 piastres, and in a later work, the same authority

states the production at [142]900,000 kilogrammes. The English paper,

_The Economist_, estimated the return of 1850 at [143]191,772,000

francs; the actual production, however, appears to have been much

larger. It cannot be placed at a lower figure than 1,000,000 of

kilogrammes for 1851, or at about [144]230,000,000 francs. The

following is the table of details:

Mexico 133,000,000 francs = £5,320,000

Chili 22,000,000 ” 880,000

Peru 25,000,000 ” 1,000,000

Bolivia and New Granada 12,000,000 ” 480,000

Russia and Norway 5,000,000 ” 200,000

Saxony, Bohemia,

Hungary, &c., 12,000,000 ” 480,000

Spain 16,000,000 ” 640,000

The rest of Europe 5,000,000 ” 200,000

----------- ----------

Total 230,000,000 ” £9,200,000

=========== ==========

We do not think we shall be exaggerating in supposing that the

production will have reached [145]250,000,000 francs in 1852, and that

it will consequently have exceeded [146]1,100,000 kilogrammes. At this

rate the accumulated value of the precious metals produced in 1852 will

have reached the figure of [147]850,000,000 fr., of which silver will

represent the proportion of about 30 per cent; the weight of gold will

then be in the proportion of 1 to 6³⁄₁₀ to silver.

In estimating a gradual increase in the production of silver, we

have some data for our supposition. In 1843, there was scarcely

[148]16,000,000 piastres from Mexico; in 1849, the silver coined

at the Mexican Mint amounted to [149]20,000,000 dollars, without

reckoning that portion which escaped duty, and which probably amounted

to [150]3,000,000 or 4,000,000 more; [151]we are certainly quite

within the mark, it is even more probable that the production this

year may again reach the sum of [152]27,000,000 dollars, to which

it had attained in 1805, under the Spanish Government. In Chili the

progress has been still more rapid, the mines which in 1841 produced

[153]821,000 piastres, and in 1845, [154]1,534,000, having in 1849

given [155]3,343,000, and in 1850 [156]4,070,000 piastres.

One cause of a purely local nature has contributed to this result.

It is known that the process of amalgamation is almost the only one

employed by the miners in extracting the ores of Chili, Peru, and

Mexico. To obtain 1 cwt. of silver it is necessary to employ 1½

cwt. of quicksilver; it is evident, therefore, that the price of

quicksilver must have a great influence on the cost of extraction.

When it has become too dear, the working has been confined to the

richest mines; when it has fallen the increase in the working of the

poorer ores has soon followed. Before the war of independence, the

Crown of Spain, preserving the monopoly of the sale of quicksilver,

gave it out at all their depots in Mexico at [157]35 to 40 piastres the

cwt.; thence arose the immense increase in the workings of the silver

mines, notwithstanding the coarseness of the ores. Since the Spanish

Government, however, has, pressed by the miserable position of its

finances, farmed out the produce of the Almaden mines, the lessees who

had agreed to pay a very heavy rent, and who had no competition to fear

for a long period of time, raised the price of the quicksilver beyond

all bounds. A few years since the price at Guanaxuato rose to [158]150

piastres the cwt. In 1850 the agent of Messrs. Rothschild fixed the

price at [159]103 piastres in Vera Cruz, and at [160]105 at the depot

in Mexico. At the same date the price was [161]120 at Mazatlan. The

cost price of the quicksilver at Almaden is [162]18 dollars the cwt.,

and it is sold at the rate of [163]45 dollars for extraction of the

ores in Spain.

The high price will cease with the monopoly. Spain has no longer the

exclusive privilege of furnishing quicksilver for the mines in the New

World. California possesses mines of cinnabar in abundance, and they

are now in full work. Those of New-Almaden, situated at some leagues

from San Francisco, are now producing [164]400 kilogrammes a day. At

300 day’s work this could give a provision of [165]120,000 kilogrammes,

sufficient to work at least [166]80,000 kilogrammes of silver. At

the mine itself this quicksilver is worth [167]25 piastres the cwt.;

brought to Fresnillo, near the rich veins of Sombrerete, and on the

backs of mules from the port of Mazatlan, it has been sold at [168]93

piastres in 1850. The proprietors of New-Almaden undertake to reduce

the price whenever the price of Spanish quicksilver shall be lowered.

They have sent some of it to Chili, where silver-mine working has

taken a fresh start. They can sell it advantageously in Peru, for the

quicksilver of Huancavelica cost at Pasco in August, 1850, [169]104

piastres the cwt. The mine of New Almaden is not the only one being

worked in California; cinnabar is met with in several directions, and

hereafter it is probable that California may be looked to as a country

producing quicksilver as well as gold.

The news of the discovery of quicksilver mines in Mexico, in the

neighbourhood of San Luis de Potosi, was confirmed by accounts received

in London in March last. Are they old mines formerly abandoned on

account of their poverty, or have they really discovered an ore which,

as at New Almaden, yields a produce of 50 per cent. of quicksilver?

This is a point yet to be cleared up. In the meantime the price of

silver has fallen in the district of Guanaxuato to [170]40 piastres

the hundred weight, and it is now varying between a price of [171]55

and 56 piastres. In short, one of the conditions connected with silver

mining has materially changed. An economy of [172]60 or 70 piastres per

hundred weight in the cost of amalgamation can hardly fail to kindle a

fresh spirit of enterprize.

Another cause will necessarily act on the production of silver, and

that is the very abundance of gold. When silver is found to be more in

demand, fresh activity will ensue, both in reopening old galleries,

which have been closed as not sufficiently remunerative, and in pushing

on the work in those actually in operation. If the mines, feeding the

present supply, are becoming exhausted, and other sources are not

forthcoming, in a few years silver will reach the price of gold, or

the value of gold will descend to that of silver; but as the limits of

silver working are but the price of labour, the power of machinery, and

the application of science, so, every increase in the quantity of gold

which is not caused by accidental circumstances, or by an extraordinary

demand, must produce a corresponding increase in the production of

silver. Is not this a fact which we have been witnessing since 1850?

Who can venture to affirm that Californian gold has had no influence in

stimulating the workings of silver in Mexico and Chili? Besides this,

the extraction of gold is generally accompanied with a production of

silver. Silver mines are not always auriferous, and the richest in gold

contain but a small quantity of it, but gold mines are almost always

argentiferous. The proportion of silver in a “nugget” of gold is about

⅛th in California, ¹⁄₁₀th in Siberia, and ⅕th in New South Wales. So

that for every [173]four kilogrammes of gold in Australia, there is

about one of silver. This is an important fact resulting from chemical

analysis.

The production of silver is in the course of increase. Will that of

gold be kept up? It is reasonable to entertain considerable doubt

on this point. In Siberia we have seen it retrograde since 1847.

The extraction appears stationary--perhaps rather on the decrease in

California. Australia alone, with gold fields yet unexplored, appears

likely to produce much more than heretofore. Auriferous strata may be

discovered elsewhere, and add to the general stock. Combining these

various circumstances, we incline to the opinion that the quantities

now forming the annual production of gold will not be diminished for

a certain number of years; but when the miners have exhausted the

gatherings from the alluvial deposits, and it becomes necessary to seek

the golden ore in the rocks and mountains, in which nature appears

during the various revolutions and convulsions of the world, to have

deposited it; then the working of the mines will depend upon the amount

of capital and the degree of science, which may hereafter be brought to

bear on that description of enterprize.

In a paper read in 1848, before the Royal Institution of London, Sir

Roderick Murchison remarks that the principal deposits of gold are

found in auriferous “detritus,” and that the same degree of success

must not be expected to ensue from exploring the veins, which are

ramified through the quartz rock. The result hitherto shown in

California fully confirms this theory, as is shown in the following

letter from an engineer at St. Francisco, dated 4th April last, after

an expedition amongst the localities occupied by the gold diggers:--

“I send you the result of experiments made upon fragments of rock. In

each we have operated upon three tons of quartz, reduced to powder, and

carefully worked by amalgamation. We have made five experiments upon

as many veins in the county of Bath, which is situated between l’Yuba

and the River de la Plume. No. 1 has produced [174]3 dollars 53 cents

per ton; No. 2, [175]9 dollars 50 cents; Nos. 3 and 4, [176]11 dollars

each; and No. 5, [177]17 dollars.

“In the county of Nevada, experiments have been made on four different

points. The first has given [178]15 dollars per ton; the second,

scarcely any gold; the third, [179]14 dollars per ton--this mine, upon

which a company had established works, has been abandoned;--and the

fourth has given [180]59 dollars, the vein being of an extraordinary

richness, and having yielded large returns to the proprietors.

“In the county of Eldorado, three different veins did not give a larger

return than [181]17 dollars per ton; a fourth equalled the richness of

No. 4, in the adjoining county.

“In the county of Mariposa, out of eight experiments, three veins

gave hardly [182]3 to 7 dollars per ton; three more gave [183]7 to 20

dollars; one gave [184]24 dollars; and one more, [185]38. The two last

veins have attracted miners, who are going to work them. No enterprize

requires a more careful and a more expensive examination than an

auriferous quartz mine. A good vein, yielding [186]36 dollars per ton,

may be considered, by moderate people, as worth working; sometimes they

are found much richer; but out of all the quartz-crushing mills which

have been set up in California, I do not think that one-third are used

for mines which are yielding, for any continued period, [187]30 dollars

the ton; so that one-half of the works of this nature are suspended.”

From the above account, it would appear that a vein of quartz, to be

considered productive, should give 36 dollars, or [188]192 francs

per ton. This return represents a weight of 55 grammes upon 1000

kilogrammes, or 5½ parts of gold out of 100,000 parts of quartz.

Mineral of iron stone will give 10 to 15 of metal per 100; and the

production by melting is infinitely less troublesome or expensive than

the extraction of gold. In Australia, it was at first supposed, after

an analysis of some ounces of quartz, taken from Mount Ophir, that

the ton would yield more than £1100 sterling; but these experiments,

made on so small a scale, are of little value. It is not likely that

Australia, when the miners find themselves reduced to the necessity of

working the quartz rocks, will show any considerable increase of yield

over California.

The extraordinary abundance of gold, then, does not appear to be of

permanent duration. It is a sudden outbreak which we, accordingly,

have to meet. It does not appear to be, as far as we can now form

any opinion, a reign of one metal, which is likely to take the place

of some other; nevertheless, there will most infallibly be a very

marked fall of gold in comparison with silver, unless met by a most

extraordinary activity in working the silver mines; other causes,

however, although secondary in themselves, appear, concurrently, likely

to neutralize part of the effect of this superabundance.

It is of little importance to ascertain the amount of the annual

production of the precious metals, unless we investigate the

proportions in which they are distributed between the two hemispheres.

Silver gives rise to a regular trade, and, coming from sources

long open, it is sent almost exclusively to Europe, as an article

of exchange, against the produce of her soil, or of her industry.

Gold in California, on the contrary, a source of unexpected wealth,

starting up in a new country, is first absorbed by the wants of a local

circulation. A new society, formed in the midst of a desert country,

necessarily requires some medium of exchange: some money. Next to

the immediate necessities of California come the wants of the United

States. These States have, for some years past, been endeavouring to

introduce a greater amount of the precious metals into their monetary

circulation. The gold of California has powerfully contributed to

effect this object. Silver coin now circulates, but in small amounts,

throughout the Union. They have coined gold pieces of 20, 10, 5, and

even of one dollar. Out of [189]400,000,000 to 500,000,000 francs,

brought in during the three first years, not more than [190]70,000,000

or 75,000,000 have found their way to Europe. The import of 1851 has

been more sensibly felt. According to the returns of the American

newspapers, the quantity of gold shipped to Europe from New York and

New Orleans, was, during last year, [191]200,000,000 francs.

The like result is obtained from other channels of information. The

Mint of London, which ordinarily coins gold at the rate of about

£2,000,000 sterling per annum; and which, in 1850, had not coined

more than £1,492,000 sterling; in 1851, increased their operations

to the extent of a coinage of £4,200,000 sterling (above 105,000,000

of francs). The moiety of this gold must have come from California.

In the same year, the mint of Paris coined in gold [192]269,709,570

francs, of which about half was supplied by the conversion of

100,000,000 of Dutch Guillaumes into French money. In the accounts of

the German Mints, we find about [193]200,000,000 of Californian gold.

If we are to judge from the operations of our own mint, the import

of 1852 will be smaller than that of 1851; for we have coined but

14,000,000 pieces in gold during the first three months of this year.

Australia sends regularly large amounts of her gold to England; but

a part of the export of gold dust, or “nuggets,” is returned in gold

coin. Many vessels have lately cleared from London with £200,000

sterling; and this at a time when England had barely received £800,000

sterling, from Sydney and Melbourne. Considerable amounts will likewise

be imported in plate and jewellery. The more wealth increases in

the colony, the more gold will be employed both for circulation and

for luxuries. The producing country will be most certainly, _par

excellence_, the country of consumption. Europe contains 200,000,000

inhabitants, of whom not one-half are adequately supplied with metallic

money. It would require, certainly, an addition of many milliards of

francs to the quantity of the present metallic circulation, to put many

of these countries in an equally favourable position in this respect

with France, Belgium, Switzerland, Holland, and Great Britain. We

know, that only nations of industrious habits are in want of a larger

supply of gold and silver because they alone carry on trade to any

extent. Abundance of production precedes and gives rise to a demand

for money. Wealth must exist in a country before the sign of that

wealth is required; but, at the same time, it cannot be denied that

the circulation of the precious metals stimulates, to a great degree,

the creation of richness; it acts like roads, canals, or other modes

of transport, which, by opening the means of reaching markets, extend

the radius of operations, and give additional value to commodities. One

half of Europe has a trade of inconsiderable importance, and derives

but a small part of the benefit of the produce of its own soil. It has

neither industry nor credit. In many countries now, gold and silver are

replaced by the use of paper-money, often discredited in its own, and

in all cases valueless out of its own country.

Austria has just made, partly in London, and partly in Frankfort, a

loan of £3,500,000, intended principally to restore the credit of her

paper money. This will be the first step towards the restoration

of metallic money, which had disappeared to such an extent, that

the smaller notes were often divided into four, to use for change.

Prussia, Poland, Russia, and Turkey, have experienced, in different

degrees, the like embarrassment. Before these various markets are

all superabundantly supplied with gold and silver, the treasures of

Siberia, Australia, and the two Americas, may be diffused for many

years over the continent of Europe.

The scarcity of gold had restricted its use; in France, for example,

the smallest gold coin was [194]20 francs. Since it has become more

common, the Mint have coined pieces of [195]10 francs, which are much

liked, and are convenient for use. These smaller coins appear likely

to take the place of a portion of our silver, which is needlessly

cumbersome. It is supposed that the use of Bank-notes of [196]200 and

100 francs has economised the use of several hundreds of millions of

the precious metals. The 10-franc pieces, when more generally used in

circulation, will take the place of, and drive out a portion of silver

coin. The demand for silver then will diminish, whilst that for gold

is increasing. Silver will be used as change for gold--as gold is for

bank-notes. This is the case to such an extent in England, where the

silver circulation is small, that the Mint in London, which coined

£1,492,000 sterling in gold, in 1850, only coined £130,000 sterling

in silver in the same year, whilst, in the same year, [197]86,000,000

francs in silver were coined at the Mint in Paris. It must not be

forgotten that the use of the precious metals is not confined to the

limits of Christian civilization. The Chinese import Peruvian and

Mexican dollars in exchange for their silks and teas; they attract

by their trade the gold produced in the neighbouring Islands, and in

the Straits of Sunda. This industrious nation has sent its contingent

of labourers and traders both to California and Australia. A portion

of Californian gold has already gone to China, but Australia appears

better situated for the purpose of supplying the eastern regions and

the southern portions of Asia with the precious metals. The Australian

gold, however, sent there will be as so much lost treasure; for whilst

the precious metals which are thrown into circulation in Europe

continue in use as coin for a long time, that which is sent to China,

or India, or Africa, altogether disappears; it is not required for

circulation, but seems to be consumed.

Nothing appears more likely to restore the confidence of those who

have taken alarm at the abundance of gold than the consideration of

the almost unlimited extent of its market. What people, civilized

or uncivilized, agricultural or manufacturing, do not enter into

competition for a supply! What are the millions of francs extracted

from the Cordilleras when compared with the capital created by the

labour of the inhabitants of the whole globe?

The combined washings of the Altai, California, and Australia, during

a quarter of a century, would be required to produce a sum equal

to the annual revenue of England alone. This unexpected harvest of

the precious metals is but an addition to a common fund of wealth;

it cannot produce a deep or a durable impression on the almost

incalculable mass of wealth already existing in the world.

After all, Europe herself does not preserve gold and silver as

relics. Money is used by wear and tear to such an extent that it must

from time to time be recoined, and the consequent loss falls on the

community at large. The use of silver and gold plate, of gold work and

jewellery, is increasing every day, as a distinguishing mark of the

rise of the middle classes; the manufacturers of France, England, and

Switzerland are at work for all the world. English statisticians have

estimated the loss, from use, disasters at sea, and export without

return of the precious metals, in the United States and Europe, at

more than [198]125,000,000 francs a-year. A more moderate estimate

reduces this sum to [199]75,000,000 francs. As to articles of luxury,

the sums of gold and silver employed therein annually, have been

estimated by Mr. Jacob, at [200]148,000,000 francs, without including

the consumption of the United States of America. Mr. M’Culloch, who

embraces the United States in his calculations, puts the amount at

[201]150,000,000. France, herself employing upwards of [202]30,000,000

francs, it may be admitted, without fear of exaggeration, that the

sum of [203]125,000,000 of gold is used for domestic purposes. Here,

then, we have an annual consumption of [204]200,000,000 francs; the

proportion borne by gold in this absorption of the precious metals

is every day becoming more important. What remains, at the present

time, of the enormous masses of the precious metals which Mexico and

Peru have poured forth during the last three centuries? The amount

of gold and silver now in the form of circulation would scarcely

equal the produce of the mines during the last fifty years. The 30

milliards which America sent to Europe, from the Spanish Conquest to

the beginning of the 19th century, has almost entirely disappeared. It

would appear as if industry, in its contact with gold and silver, must

have volatilized it. France converted into coin a large amount of the

precious metals; but when coined, it did not remain there. Exportation

appears constantly to produce the effect of banishing it from the

country. Thus, in twelve years, from 1840 to 1852, we have imported

[205]123,012 kilogrammes of gold, and we have exported [206]71,217

kilogrammes; the difference in favour of the import being [207]51,795

kilogrammes, equal to [208]181,138,000 francs, showing an average of

[209]15,000,000 francs per annum. Jewellery, goldsmith’s work and

gilding, employ, annually, in France, quantities of gold exceeding

that sum in amount. The excess, then, is taken from the coinage, which

accounts for the ordinary premium on gold in our market. The average

would be considerably reduced if we except the year 1851, during

which the import has exceeded the export by [210]34,503 kilogrammes;

but the results of 1851 may be considered as exceptional. Already,

the greater part has disappeared; gold finds its way from France to

London. The Bank of France, whose metallic reserve in 1851 included

an amount of [211]100,000,000 francs of gold, now does not hold above

[212]15,000,000 to 20,000,000. French gold coin, common enough in

Paris, is scarcely seen in the provinces.

From 1840 to 1852, French commerce imported [213]10,175,312 kilogrammes

of silver, and exported [214]3,688,279 kilogrammes. The excess of

import, [215]6,487,033 kilogrammes, represents a sum of 1,303,893,633

francs, or 108,657,802 francs a year. Admitting that [216]15,000,000

are annually absorbed in the demands for articles of luxury, and

[217]10,000,000 or 12,000,000 for wear, our monetary reserve of silver

would have increased at least [218]1,100,000,000 since 1840. This

leaves a large margin in the circulation of France for the displacement

of silver by gold coin. When the import of gold shall have exceeded

the export by an amount equal annually to [219]200,000,000 francs,

with this accumulated reserve of [220]1,100,000,000 and with an annual

excess of [221]80,000,000 to 90,000,000 francs over the import and

consumption of silver, it will require at least ten years to restore

the equilibrium between the two metals, to the state in which it was in

1840.

No subject has given rise to more rash and speculative opinions

than that connected with the trade in gold and silver. Amidst the

great variety of conflicting phenomena, statistics appear almost

valueless; but so long as gold continues to bear a premium, in spite

of the apparent superabundance, and notwithstanding its partial

demonetization, it may well be considered doubtful whether the relative

proportions, established by law between gold and silver in so many

countries, will be materially affected for at least some years to come.

Various remedies have been proposed by alarmists, to prevent the evils

of the influx of Californian and other gold. Some have desired that

government should limit the quantity of gold to be annually coined.

This expedient, in the event of a depreciation in value, would be of

little avail, for the quantity imported and kept in the shape of bars,

would equally augment the general stock, and weigh down the price.

Others have thought of altering the legal value, but this plan would

be useless as long as gold remained at a premium. If gold became

depreciated it would be injurious only until the fall was ascertained,

and considered durable; this once determined, things would go on as

before.

Then comes the question as to the demonetization of gold; doubtless no

point is of greater importance for a standard of circulation than a

fixed value. It is a fact that in all those countries where a double

standard of gold and silver is established, one or other has always

obtained the ascendancy, and maintained a premium, and has ceased to

appear in the shape of money; logically, it would appear quite enough

to regulate all prices by the value of one metal, without exposing

trade to the uncertainty of an alteration in value of two. In the

adoption of one only, however, it is desirable to examine which of

the two has, over any given period of time, been subject to the least

variation. Before the discovery of California, silver would certainly

have had little chance of being selected. Even now it appears to me

that the question has not so materially changed as might at first sight

be supposed.

It should be remembered also, that it is not so easy for all countries

who may have adopted the double standard to exclude one from their

monetary code. The example of Holland has proved that gold, having

lost its character as legal money, will no longer be used as a token.

To demonetize gold is to exclude it from the market. For a great

commercial country like Holland, living in the greatest freedom, and

carrying on its trade by exchanging and carrying the products of all

the countries in the world, to exclude one of its habitual means

of exchange, may not be attended with great risks. England, though

little disposed to imitate Holland at present, might perhaps do so

with less danger, from having the commerce of the whole world in its

hands. France, unless under pressing necessity, could not demonetize

her gold without exposing herself to a complete disturbance in all

her relations, both at home and abroad. Our trade is tied up by

a completely protective system, without alluding to those direct

prohibitions which disgrace our customs’ tariffs; almost all the duties

which affect articles of primary consumption are, in short, disguised

prohibitions. In exchange for the products of our own country, which

we have to sell to the foreigner, we can hardly purchase in return

anything but raw materials. Thus, bar and pig-iron, those articles of

primary importance, have been subjected to duties at the rate of 100

per cent. on their value. In those countries enjoying a legislation

attentive to the wants of trade, and where the custom-houses are only

for the objects of revenue, the imports and the exports will show an

even balance. In our country, where we have been desirous of opposing

a barrier to the free course of exchange, goods exported have always a

preponderance in value over those imported. In 1850, for example, the

imports represented a value of [222]790,000,000 francs, and the exports

[223]1,068,000,000 francs, showing a difference of [224]278,000,000.

England and the United States, together, receive of our products an

excess of [225]236,000,000 above the exports we receive from them;

and as those countries with which we trade cannot pay us in goods,

they must make their return in gold and silver. This was the reason

of the import of [226]220,000,000 francs in coin in 1850, as shown

in our official returns. So long as the system of protection is the

ruling policy of France, so long will it be impossible to deprive gold

of its value as money; to attempt it would be to withdraw from trade

one of its most useful means of exchange. It would check, if not stop,

all intercourse with those countries who can only pay in gold, or who

can only sell us those commodities which we endeavour to exclude by

our tariffs. Gold flows naturally only to those countries where it is

marketable; and it is only so where it is in use as coin as well as in

commerce. A profit of half per thousand is sufficient in the present

day to turn the current of the precious metals. This circumstance ought

not to be lost sight of in the consideration of monetary legislation.

In fact, the change in the relative value of gold and silver, which

was so strongly anticipated, appears anything but imminent; if any

great change is now taking place, it appears rather to be that of a

simultaneous depreciation in the value of both metals. Deep thinking

persons are not content with expressing their fears; they are already

providing themselves with the means of averting the evils which they

anticipate. This is one of the causes which have raised the value

of railroad stocks, and of landed property; and this explains the

comparative abandonment, not of speculation, but of capital ordinarily

seeking investment in government stocks. Alarm is felt at placing money

on security, of which both the capital and the interest may remain

at a fixed value; these may be the more sensibly affected, if the

value of the precious metals is altered; whereas the shareholder of a

railroad would have a chance of having his income increased; and the

landed proprietors that of having their capital augmented in the same

proportion in which the value of money would be depreciated.

In dwelling on these facts, I have no idea of setting myself up as a

prophet. I would confine myself to the wish to indicate some of the

symptoms of the present position of these matters; the danger, if any

exists, is certainly not very near at hand. We have already seen the

use of bank notes in France increased to an extent which, owing to the

stability of their value, has largely taken the place of specie. It

is but reasonable to suppose, that the present abundance of gold and

silver will make no greater disturbance within a short time, than has

the great increase of paper money.

The influx of the precious metals has been, in a certain sense, a

providential occurrence during the revolutionary state of Europe.

Credit had either disappeared, or had at least become stagnant.

Everywhere, amidst the tempest of the times, both past and

prospective, business had been suspended, or carried on only for

ready money. Affairs had assumed an aspect of a primitive state of

exchange. An increase of metallic circulation might again restore

confidence, and calm agitation. The average excess of money imported

over that exported, which, before 1848, was not above [227]80,000,000

to 100,000,000 francs, amounted in 1848 and 1849 to nearly

[228]300,000,000 francs for each year. Specie in these times supplied

the wants of trade, and maintained prices; but, in more easy times,

when used not alone, but concurrently with paper money and bills of

exchange, for the purposes of circulation, gold and silver would

naturally be in use in proportion to the movements of trade. The reason

why [229]600,000,000 of francs in coin now encumbers the vaults of

the Bank of France, is, because capital is only employed in the stock

markets, and that the restoration of trade on a large scale is still

confined to a sort of anticipation; but let the industry of the country

experience a complete restoration of confidence in the future, and we

shall soon see the metallic reserve of the bank diminish; and, as a

natural consequence, our market will attract an import of the precious

metals from abroad. In short, gold and silver will then be wanted; the

state of trade will improve, and we shall have to seek for an increased

supply.

Let us not then either despair or be too confident; the world is not

entering on an Eldorado, nor is it on the eve of a state of ruin.

Those who consider gold and silver as positive wealth, who confound an

abundant supply of the precious metals with an abundance of capital,

and who affirm that the gold imported from California must lower

the rate of interest, should remember that the rate of interest is

determined by the state of confidence, as well as by the general rule

of the supply and demand for loanable capital, and that confidence

depends upon the good order existing throughout the civilized world.

California itself shows the delusion of such an idea--for there, where

gold is strewing the land, interest has risen as high as from eight to

ten per cent. per month. Those on the contrary, who, at the idea of the

galleons seeking freights in the western continent, dream only of ruin

and catastrophes--who anticipate that the day will arrive that the Bank

of France will pay persons to take away her gold--should not forget

that she sells it now without difficulty even at a small premium, and

that this increased trade in gold has not hitherto ruined anybody.

PARIS, _August, 1852_.

Remarks on the production of the precious metals and on the demonetization of gold in several countries in Europe · 第 13 / 14 题