Parker, as has been said, made a will, leaving to his wife a small

property on which he had claims near Exeter. This she enjoyed for a

number of years, but ultimately her rights, whether erroneously or not,

were decided to be invalid, and she was deprived of the pittance which

had formed her maintenance. She was thrown into great distress, and was

compelled to solicit assistance from the charitable, having become

nearly if not entirely blind. The late King William gave her at one time

10_l._, and at another 20_l._ In 1836, the forlorn and miserable

condition of poor Parker's widow was made known to the London

magistrates, and a temporary refuge was provided for her. But temporary

assistance was of little avail to one whose physical infirmities

rendered her incapable any longer of helping herself, and again her

miserable condition came under the cognizance of the public authorities.

An appeal to the charitable has recently been made, by a portion of the

daily press, in her favour, but with what success we are unable to say.

She is now seventy years of age, blind, and friendless. Time and

misfortune have not quenched her affection for the partner of her early

days. Of him she yet speaks with all the enthusiasm of youthful

affection, and still mourns his fate.

MARIA THERESA PHIPOE, _alias_ MARY BENSON

EXECUTED FOR MURDER.

We do not recollect ever to have seen the case of any woman who has

exhibited so much masculine determination as Mrs. Phipoe. She was twice

tried at the Old Bailey upon charges equally atrocious, and each equally

exhibiting the ferocity of her disposition.

In the first case, the indictment charged that she had feloniously

assaulted Mr. John Cortois, with intent to kill and murder him. Her

trial came on at the Old Bailey in the month of January 1795, when it

was proved in evidence that the prisoner was a person of abandoned

character, and that she kept a house, where she was in the habit of

receiving visits of a certain character from gentlemen. Among her other

patrons was Mr. John Cortois, a gentleman of considerable property; and

it appears that Mr. Cortois having called upon her one evening, he was

alarmed at finding himself suddenly seized from behind by his paramour,

and her servant, a woman almost as powerful as herself, by whom he was

speedily overpowered, and bound to his chair with strong cords. His

person being thus secured, Mrs. Phipoe immediately, with horrid

imprecations, demanded that he should sign a note or bill in her favour

for 2000_l._, threatening that, in the event of his refusal, she would

instantly cut his throat; and even enforcing her demands by holding a

knife at his throat in such a position as that on the smallest movement

on his part would have procured the infliction of a wound. In a state of

the utmost terror and alarm, he consented to attach his name to the

instrument which was produced, ready drawn by Mrs. Phipoe, and then he

imagined, as a matter of course, that he should be at liberty. But Mrs.

Phipoe by this time had begun to consider the possibility of his

preventing the negotiation of the note, and determining that "Dead men

tell no tales," she had made up her mind that he should have no

opportunity of disclosing the means by which it had been obtained. For

this diabolical purpose, she now made a violent attack upon him with a

knife, and wounded him in many places; but Mr. Cortois, becoming

desperate in his turn, burst the bonds by which he was confined with a

violent effort, and attacked his assailant. A struggle took place, in

which Mr. Cortois was again mastered by the united efforts of Mrs.

Phipoe and her servant; and then a choice was tendered to him whether he

would die by poison, by being shot, or by the knife which Mrs. Phipoe

brandished in a threatening manner over his head. The unfortunate

gentleman was now much weakened by loss of blood, and was almost

prevented from opposing the further violence of his demoniac assailants,

when, luckily, the cries which he had raised brought him assistance in

the shape of a watchman, through whose instrumentality Mrs. Phipoe was

secured.

Upon this testimony a verdict of guilty was returned; but a point of law

being subsequently raised in favour of the prisoner, it was declared

that the judgment must be arrested.

Mrs. Phipoe was, however, subsequently, on the 23rd of May, indicted for

the common assault upon Mr. Cortois, and a verdict of guilty having been

a second time returned, she was subjected to twelve months' imprisonment

in Newgate.

A year had scarcely elapsed after the termination of the period of her

incarceration, before Mrs. Phipoe, or Mrs. Benson, as she was now

called, was again in custody on a charge of murder.

She was indicted on the 8th of December 1797, for the wilful murder of

Mary Cox; and it appeared that at the time of the commission of this

offence, the prisoner lived in lodgings in Garden-street, St. George's

in the East. On the night of the murder, Mrs. Cox called upon her; but

within a short time after she had entered her room, a scuffle was heard,

followed by loud groans. The mistress of the house demanded to know the

cause of the disturbance, but the prisoner declared that it was only

Mrs. Cox in a fit. The door being opened, however, Mrs. Benson was

observed to be covered with blood, and Mrs. Cox was found lying on the

ground desperately wounded. Two persons immediately went for a doctor,

while a constable was also sent for, by whom the prisoner was taken into

custody. Mrs. Cox, on being examined, was found to have sustained some

severe wounds, from which there was no prospect of her recovering; and

she pointed out Mrs. Benson as the person by whom they had been

inflicted. A large clasp-knife, covered with blood, was found on the

table in the room; and by its side lay a part of a finger; and on Mrs.

Benson being questioned, she admitted that that was the knife with which

"she had done the woman's business;" and said that her own finger had

been cut off in the scuffle. Mrs. Cox subsequently died in the hospital,

from the effects of the stabs she had received, having previously made a

declaration before a magistrate as to the circumstances attending her

murder. She said that having purchased a gold watch of the prisoner for

11_l._, she asked that a coffee-cup, which she pointed out, might be

given to her into the bargain. The prisoner bade her take it; but on her

raising her hand to remove it from the shelf, she received a stab in the

neck, which was followed by many others in the same place and on

different parts of her body. The prisoner subsequently got her on the

bed, and swore that she would murder her outright, that she should not

tell her own tale; but she was interrupted by the entrance of the

landlady.

The prisoner in her defence declared that Mrs. Cox had abused her, and

had violently wounded her, so as to cut off part of her finger before

she offered any violence to her; but that then, being maddened with pain

and rage, she admitted she had attacked her. She knew nothing of what

subsequently occurred, until she was found by her landlady in her own

room covered with blood.

The jury having returned a verdict that the prisoner was guilty, she

behaved with great hardihood, frequently interrupting the learned judge

(Mr. Baron Perryn) in his observations, while condemning her to death.

Sentence having been passed, however, that she should be hanged and

subsequently dissected, she was removed from the bar, and then she

appeared to be fully sensible of her guilt, and of the nature of her

present position.

She was executed before Newgate, December the 11th, 1797; and after

hanging an hour in the view of a great number of spectators, one-third

of whom were females, the body was cut down, and delivered to the

surgeons for dissection.

In her last moments she confessed the justice of her sentence, but

denied having cut off her own finger, saying it was done in the scuffle

with the woman she murdered. She owned to have been guilty of many

enormities, and attributed her frequent gusts of passion to the use of

laudanum.

Her body was publicly exhibited in a place built for the purpose in the

Old Bailey.

JAMES O'COIGLEY, _alias_ FAVEY.

EXECUTED FOR HIGH TREASON.

James O'Coigley was indicted at Maidstone, on the 21st of May 1798, for

high treason. The indictment was read by Mr. Knapp, who afterwards

stated the charges it contained in a summary manner. He said there were

three distinct species of treason charged in the indictment and seven

overt acts. The first treason was compassing and imagining the death of

the king; the second, adhering to his enemies; the third, compassing and

imagining, inventing, devising and intending, to move and stir certain

foreigners and strangers, that is to say, the persons exercising the

powers of government in France, to invade this kingdom. The first overt

act was sending intelligence to the enemy; the other overt acts were

attempts to hire vessels, and to leave the kingdom.

At the trial, which lasted during the whole of two days, an immense body

of evidence was produced in support of the charges preferred against the

prisoner. A pocket-book, however, which had been found in his

great-coat, and in which was a letter addressed to the Executive

Directory of France, afforded conclusive evidence of his guilt.

Upon his being called upon for his defence, he addressed the jury in the

following terms:--

"It is impossible for me to prove a negative; but it is a duty I owe to

you, and to myself, solemnly to declare that I never was the bearer of

any message or paper of this kind to France in the course of my life.

That paper is not mine: it never belonged to me. It states that it was

to be carried by the bearer of the last: this is something which might

have been proved, but it is impossible for me to prove a negative. There

is also in this paper an allusion to secret committees and political

societies. I declare that I never attended any political society

whatever. With these considerations I consign my life to your justice;

not doubting but that you will conduct yourselves as English jurymen

ever do, and that your verdict will be such as shall receive the

approbation of your own conscience, your country, and your God."

The jury, after about half-an-hour's consideration, found O'Coigley

Guilty.

Mr. Justice Buller, in an address to the prisoner, which he read from a

written paper previously to his passing the sentence, observed that he

had been clearly convicted of the most atrocious crime which could be

committed in any country--that of meditating the destruction of a

sovereign, who was one of the best, the most just, upright, and amiable

of princes that ever graced a throne; and he could not conceive what

were the motives which could actuate any man even to wish for the death

of one who had ever been the father of his people.

The prisoner was also found guilty of conspiring to overturn the

constitution of these kingdoms--a constitution which, from the

experiment of years, had been found to be the best calculated of any

that ever existed in the world to ensure the liberty, security, and

happiness of the people who lived under it.

These atrocious crimes became still greater from the manner in which

they were intended to be perpetrated--that of inviting a foreign enemy

to come and invade and conquer these countries.

Those people who had fancied such an event to be a desirable one ought

to think seriously what the consequences of it would be, provided it was

possible to be accomplished. Did they suppose that (desperate as their

present situation might be) their condition would be bettered by having

their country put into the possession of people who were holding out the

delusive hopes of what they call liberty to other nations? Could such

persons hope that they themselves should enjoy liberty, even supposing

the conquerors to have enjoyed as free a constitution as any in the

world? No; they would become suspected, be despised, and destroyed by

them.

A celebrated writer (Montesquieu) very justly observed upon this

subject, that a country conquered by a democratic nation always enjoyed

less liberty, was more miserable, and more enslaved, than if that

country happened to have been conquered by a nation whose government was

monarchical. But if there was any illustration of this observation

wanting, one had only to look to the conduct of the French at this

moment towards Holland, Italy, Switzerland, and every other country they

had conquered. His lordship believed that the prisoner might have been

actuated by motives similar to those which used formerly to induce many

people to think that the killing of men of a different religion would

give them a claim to canonization. But, though the motives might be

similar, the subjects connected with them were very different. In the

present times he did not believe that any person entertained such

sentiments about religion. On the contrary, he was sorry to find that

religion was too much neglected, and that the peace and tranquillity of

numbers of people were destroyed in consequence of their having lost all

belief of the existence of a Divine Providence, and totally abandoned

all hopes of a future state. He was afraid that the prisoner had been

infected with this infidelity; and if he was, he (the judge) prayed that

the Almighty God, in his infinite mercy and goodness, would change his

heart, and cause him to repent of his sins.

His lordship then, in a solemn and awful manner, passed the following

sentence:--

"That the prisoner be taken from the bar to prison, and from thence to

the place of execution; there to be hanged, but not until he be dead, to

be cut down while yet alive, and then to have his heart and bowels taken

out and burnt before his face; his head to be severed from his body, and

his body to be divided into four quarters."

Mr. O'Coigley listened to this address and sentence with attention, but

at the same time with the greatest coolness. He bowed his head when the

judge concluded, his countenance expressing at once resignation and

firmness.

Thursday, 7th June, being fixed upon for the execution, on the previous

day, the unhappy prisoner received an intimation to that effect without

emotion. He spent the evening very calmly. He had but one thing, he

said, on his mind which created any anxiety; that was, an apprehension

that he might be misrepresented after his death. He was anxious to be

faithfully reported, and that was all he wanted. On Thursday, at a

quarter past eleven o'clock, O'Coigley left the jail. He was dressed in

black; his hair was cropped and powdered, his shirt-collar open, and he

wore no neckcloth. His elbows were tied behind with ropes, and over his

shoulders was the rope with which he was to be executed. He stepped into

the hurdle; and on his sitting down, a chain was put round his waist to

fasten him. The executioner sat opposite to him. The cavalcade was well

guarded by a large body of the Kent Volunteers; and throughout the

journey to Pennenden Heath, the prisoner was engaged in reading from a

book of devotions.

Upon their arrival at the place of execution, the military formed a

square. The prisoner being unchained, he rose up and stood in the

hurdle, and read two prayers, one of them aloud in Latin. He then took

out of his pocket an orange, and also a penknife; but being unable to

cut the orange, from his hands being bound, he gave it to a friend, whom

he beckoned to come near him, saying, "Open this orange with my

penknife; it has been said they would not trust me with a penknife, lest

I should cut my throat; but they little knew that I would not deprive

myself of the glory of dying in this way." He desired his friend to keep

the penknife for his sake, and to hold the orange, several pieces of

which he ate.

After finishing his devotions, the clergyman gave him absolution; and

having ascended the platform, he bid farewell to the jailor, thanking

him for the many civilities he had shown him. On his being tied up to

the gallows, he made the following speech:--

"I shall only here solemnly declare, that I am innocent of the charge

for which I suffer. I never was in my life the bearer of any letter, or

other paper or message, printed, written, or verbal, to the Directory of

France, nor to any person on their behalf; neither was I ever a member

of the London Corresponding Society, or of any other political society

in Great Britain; nor did I attend any of their meetings, public or

private, so help me God! I know not whether I shall be believed here in

what I say, but I am sure I shall be believed in the world to come. It

can scarcely be supposed that one like me, in this situation, going to

eternity, before the most awful tribunal, would die with a falsehood in

his mouth; and I do declare, by the hopes I confidently feel of

salvation and happiness in a future state, that my life is falsely and

maliciously taken away by corrupt and base perjury, in some cases

proceeding from mistake, no doubt, but in others from design. Almighty

God, forgive all my enemies. I beg of you to pray that God will grant me

grace--for I have many sins to answer for; but they are the sins of my

private life, and not the charge for which I now die. (Raising his

voice.) Lord have mercy on me, and receive my soul."

A white nightcap was then drawn over his face, and he made a signal by

dropping a handkerchief. The board was then let down, and he remained

suspended for twelve or thirteen minutes. Upon his being taken down, his

head was taken off by a surgeon, and the executioner held it up to the

populace, saying "This is the head of a traitor." Both head and body

were then put into a shell, and buried at the foot of the gallows.

GEORGE WALDRON, _alias_ BARRINGTON.

TRANSPORTED FOR PICKING POCKETS.

This notorious offender was born of decent parents in the year 1755, in

the town of Maynooth, county Kildare, Ireland. His father, whose name

was Waldron, was a working silversmith; and his mother followed the

occupation of mantua-maker, and occasionally joined with it the

profession of a midwife. Owing to a law-suit in which they were engaged

with a relative, for the recovery of a legacy to which they conceived

themselves entitled, their circumstances were by no means affluent. But

although they were unable to procure for their son the advantages of a

superior education, they had him instructed at an early age in reading

and writing; and afterwards, through the bounty of a medical gentleman

in the neighbourhood, he was taught the principles of arithmetic, and

the elements of geography and English grammar.

When he had entered his sixteenth year, he had the good fortune to

attract the notice of a dignitary of the Church of Ireland, through

whose interest he was placed at a free grammar-school in the Irish

capital, where his patron proposed he should fit himself for the

University; and in order that he might be able to make an appearance

equal to that of the youths with whom he was to associate, his generous

protector supplied him with money and every other necessary that could

render his situation at school not only comfortable, but respectable.

These advantages he enjoyed but a short time, for the impetuosity of his

passions hurried him into an action by which he lost his patron's favour

for ever. When he had been about half a year at the grammar-school, he

was involved in a quarrel with a lad much older and stronger than

himself. Some blows passed, in which George suffered considerably; but

in order to be revenged, he stabbed his antagonist with a penknife; and

had he not been prevented, would probably have murdered him. For this

atrocious offence the discipline of the house was inflicted with proper

severity, which irritated the youth to such a degree, that he formed the

resolution of abandoning not only the school, but also his family and

friends. His plan of escape was no sooner formed than it was carried

into execution; but before his departure he found means to steal ten or

twelve guineas from the master, and a gold repeating-watch from his

sister. With this booty he safely effected his escape from the

school-house in the middle of a still night in the month of May 1771; and

pursuing the great north road from Dublin all that night and the next

day, he arrived late in the evening at Drogheda without interruption.

Having reached this town, where he thought that he should be safe from

the chances of pursuit and discovery, by a species of forced march,

without rest or refreshment, he entered a small public-house in order to

procure the one and the other; but the following morning introduced to

his notice a band of strolling players, whose acquaintance he

immediately made. A friendship commenced under such unfavourable

circumstances, it might be thought would scarcely last many days, but it

was nevertheless maintained through choice and affection for several

years; and it appears that whilst engaged as a member of the company, he

picked up much information which was exceedingly useful to him in his

subsequent career.

Price, the manager of the company, having lived some time in London, in

the capacity of clerk to a pettifogging attorney, was intimately

acquainted with the town, and all the arts of fraud, deception, or

violence, which are practised in it by the most unprincipled classes to

procure money. For indulging these vicious propensities, he subjected

himself to the lash of the law, and was at this time an involuntary

exile in Ireland till the expiration of the term for which he was to be

transported; and this man soon became the confidant and counsellor of

the young fugitive. By his advice he renounced his paternal name,

assumed that of Barrington, and entered into the company; and in the

course of four days he became so well initiated in the mysteries of his

profession as to be able to perform the part of Jaffier in "Venice

Preserved," without the aid of a prompter, in a crowded barn in the

neighbourhood of Drogheda with the most flattering demonstrations of

applause.

His success, however, was by far too great to render it at all desirable

that he should continue his performances so near the scene of his late

depredations; and in obedience to the dictates of prudence, lest our

hero might be called upon to make his last appearance on a "stage"

fitted up with a drop, before his character as a player was fully

established, it was resolved that the whole company should, without

delay, move northwards with all speed, so as to get out of the way, with

the anticipation of their being able to reach sixty or eighty miles from

Dublin without any long bait. In order to carry this resolution into

effect, however, it was recollected that some means must be found to

feed the strollers, as the produce of their late performances was not so

weighty as to require any great exertion on the part of the treasurer to

squeeze it into his waistcoat pocket; and the gold repeater being

remembered, it was immediately given up by our hero, _pro bono publico_,

with a degree of liberality which procured for him a burst of applause

from his companions in the search of histrionic fame. The watch being

disposed off, its proceeds were equally divided, and the party set out

on its march; but when they arrived at Londonderry, it was found that

the Belvidera of the company had surrendered her heart to the new

Jaffier. A reciprocal attachment was found to exist, and the connexion

was only dissolved by the death of the lady. It appears that she was the

daughter of a respectable tradesman at Coventry; and having eloped from

her father's house, at the age of sixteen years, with a lieutenant of

marines, conducted by him to Dublin, and there, in less than three

months, was infamously abandoned to all the horrors of penury and want.

Reduced to this extremity, she readily embraced a proposal made to her

by Price, to join his company, as her only resource; and being young and

beautiful, it is not extraordinary that she should have excited a flame

in the bosom of her new admirer. She was unfortunately drowned, in her

eighteenth year, in crossing the Boyne, through the negligence of the

ferryman.

The Chronicles of Crime or The New Newgate Calendar. v. 1/2 being a series of memoirs and anecdotes of notorious characters who have outraged the laws of Great Britain from the earliest period to 1841. · 第 50 / 83 段