CHAPTER VII.

_THE MISSION OF PROPHECY._

EZRA v. 1, 2.

The work of building the temple at Jerusalem, which had been but

nominally commenced in the reign of Cyrus, when it was suddenly

arrested before the death of that king, and which had not been touched

throughout the reigns of the two succeeding kings, Cambyses and

Pseudo-Bardes, was taken up in earnest in the second year of Darius,

the son of Hystaspes (B.C. 521). The disorders of the empire were then

favourable to local liberty. Cambyses committed suicide during a

revolt of his army on the march to meet the Pretender who had assumed

the name of his murdered brother, Bardes. Seven months later the

usurper was assassinated in his palace by some of the Persian nobles.

Darius, who was one of the conspirators, ascended the throne in the

midst of confusion and while the empire seemed to be falling to

pieces. Elam, the old home of the house of Cyrus, revolted; Syria

revolted; Babylon revolted twice, and was twice taken by siege. For a

time the king's writ could not run in Palestine. But it was not on

account of these political changes that the Jews returned to their

work. The relaxing of the supreme authority had left them more than

ever at the mercy of their unfriendly neighbours. The generous

disposition of Darius might have led them to regard him as a second

Cyrus, and his religion might have encouraged them to hope that he

would be favourable to them, for Darius was a monotheist, a worshipper

of Ormazd. But they recommenced their work without making any appeal

to the Great King and without receiving any permission from him, and

they did this when he was far too busy fighting for his throne to

attend to the troubles of a small, distant city.

We must look in another direction for the impetus which started the

Jews again upon their work. Here we come upon one of the most striking

facts in the history of Israel, nay, one of the greatest phenomena in

the spiritual experience of mankind. The voice of prophecy was heard

among the ruins of Jerusalem. The Cassandra-like notes of Jeremiah had

died away more than half a century before. Then Ezekiel had seen his

fantastic visions, "a captive by the river of Chebar," and the Second

Isaiah had sounded his trumpet-blast in the East summoning the exiles

to a great hope; but as yet no prophet had appeared among the pilgrims

on their return to Jerusalem. We cannot account for the sudden

outburst of prophecy. It is a work of the Spirit that breathes like

the wind, coming we know not how. We can hear its sound; we can

perceive the fact. But we cannot trace its origin, or determine its

issues. It is born in mystery and it passes into mystery. If it is

true that "_poeta nascitur, non fit_," much more must we affirm that

the prophet is no creature of human culture. He may be cultivated,

after God has made him; he cannot be manufactured by any human

machinery. No "School of the Prophets" ever made a true prophet. Many

of the prophets never came near any such institution; some of them

distinctly repudiated the professional "order." The lower prophets

with which the Northern Kingdom once swarmed were just dervishes who

sang and danced and worked themselves into a frenzy before the altars

on the high places; these men were quite different from the truly

inspired messengers of God. Their craft could be taught, and their

sacred colleges recruited to any extent from the ranks of fanaticism.

But the rare, austere souls that spoke with the authority of the Most

High came in a totally different manner. When there was no prophet and

when visions were rare men could only wait for God to send the

hoped-for guide; they could not call him into existence. The

appearance of an inspired soul is always one of the marvels of

history. Great men of the second rank may be the creatures of their

age. But it is given to the few of the very first order to be

independent of their age, to confront it and oppose it if need be,

perhaps to turn its current and shape its course.

The two prophets who now proclaimed their message in Jerusalem

appeared at a time of deep depression. They were not borne on the

crest of a wave of a religious revival, as its spokesmen to give it

utterance. Pagan orators and artists flourished in an Augustan age.

The Hebrew prophets came when the circumstances of society were least

favourable. Like painters arising to adorn a dingy city, like poets

singing of summer in the winter of discontent, like flowers in the

wilderness, like wells in the desert, they brought life and strength

and gladness to the helpless and despondent, because they came from

God. The literary form of their work reflected the civilisation of

their day, but there was on it a light that never shone on sea or

shore, and this they knew to be the light of God. We never find a

true religious revival springing from the spirit of the age. Such a

revival always begins in one or two choice souls--in a Moses, a

Samuel, a John the Baptist, a St. Bernard, a Jonathan-Edwards, a

Wesley, a Newman. Therefore it is vain for weary watchers to scan the

horizon for signs of the times in the hope that some general

improvement of society or some widespread awakening of the Church will

usher in a better future. This is no reason for discouragement,

however. It rather warns us not to despise the day of small things.

When once the spring of living water breaks out, though it flows at

first in a little brook, there is hope that it may swell into a great

river.

The situation is the more remarkable since the first of the two

prophets was an old man, who even seems to have known the first temple

before its destruction by Nebuchadnezzar.[33] Haggai is called simply

"the prophet," perhaps because his father's name was not known, but

more likely because he himself had attained so much eminence that the

title was given to him _par excellence_. Still this may only apply to

the descriptions of him in the age of the chronicler. There is no

indication that he prophesied in his earlier days. He was probably one

of the captives who had been carried away to Babylon in his childhood,

and who had returned with Zerubbabel to Jerusalem. Yet all this time

and during the first years of his return, as far as we know, he was

silent. At length, in extreme old age, he burst out into inspired

utterance--one of Joel's old men who were to dream dreams,[34] like

John the Evangelist, whose greatest work dates from his last years,

and Milton, who wrote his great epic when affliction seemed to have

ended his life-work. He must have been brooding over the bitter

disappointment in which the enthusiasm of the returned captives had

been quenched. It could not be God's will that they should be thus

mocked and deceived in their best hopes. True faith is not a

will-o'-the-wisp that lands its followers in a dreary swamp. The hope

of Israel is no mirage. For God is faithful. Therefore the despair of

the Jews must be wrong.

[33] Hag. i. 1, ii. 9.

[34] Joel ii. 28.

We have a few fragments of the utterances of Haggai preserved for us

in the Old Testament Canon. They are so brief and bald and abrupt as

to suggest the opinion that they are but notes of his discourses, mere

outlines of what he really said. As they are preserved for us they

certainly convey no idea of wealth of poetic imagination or richness

of oratorical colouring. But Haggai may have possessed none of these

qualities, and yet his words may have had a peculiar force of their

own. He is a reflective man. The long meditation of years has taught

him the value of thoughtfulness. The burden of his message is

"Consider your ways."[35] In short, incisive utterances he arrests

attention and urges consideration. But the outcome of all he has to

say is to cheer the drooping spirits of his fellow-citizens, and urge

on the rebuilding of the temple with confident promises of its great

future. For the most part his inspiration is simple, but it is

searching, and we perceive the triumphant hopefulness of the true

prophet in the promise that the latter glory of the house of God shall

be greater than the former.[36]

[35] Hag. i. 5, 7.

[36] Hag. ii. 9.

Haggai began to prophesy on the first day of the sixth month of the

second year of Darius.[37] So effective were his words that Zerubbabel

and his companions were at once roused from the lethargy of despair,

and within three weeks the masons and carpenters were again at work on

the temple.[38] Two months after Haggai had broken the long silence of

prophecy in Jerusalem Zechariah appeared. He was of a very different

stamp; he was one of the young men who see visions. Familiar with the

imagery of Babylonian art, he wove its symbols into the pictures of

his own exuberant fancy. Moreover, Zechariah was a priest. Thus, like

Jeremiah and Ezekiel, he united the two rival tendencies which had

confronted one another in marked antagonism during the earlier periods

of the history of Israel. Henceforth the brief return of prophetism,

its soft after-glow among the restored people, is in peaceable

alliance with priestism. The last prophet, Malachi, even exhorts the

Jews to pay the priests their dues of tithe. Zechariah, like Haggai,

urges on the work of building the temple.

[37] Hag. i. 1.

[38] Hag. ii. 1 _seq._

Thus the chronicler's brief note on the appearance of two prophets at

Jerusalem, and the electrical effect of their message, is a striking

illustration of the mission of prophecy. That mission has been

strangely misapprehended by succeeding ages. Prophets have been

treated as miraculous conjurers, whose principal business consisted in

putting together elaborate puzzles, perfectly unintelligible to their

contemporaries, which the curious of later times were to decipher by

the light of events. The prophets themselves formed no such idle

estimate of their work, nor did their contemporaries assign to them

this quaint and useless rôle. Though these men were not the creatures

of their times, they lived for their times. Haggai and Zechariah, as

the chronicler emphatically puts it, "prophesied to the Jews that were

in Jerusalem, ... _even unto them_." The object of their message was

immediate and quite practical--to stir up the despondent people and

urge them to build the temple--and it was successful in accomplishing

that end. As prophets of God they necessarily touched on eternal

truths. They were not mere opportunists; their strength lay in the

grasp of fundamental principles. This is why their teaching still

lives, and is of lasting use for the Church in all ages. But in order

to understand that teaching we must first of all read it in its

original historical setting, and discover its direct bearing on

contemporary needs.

Now the question arises, In what way did these prophets of God help

the temple-builders? The fragments of their utterances which we

possess enable us to answer this question. Zerubbabel was a

disappointing leader. Such a man was far below the expected Messiah,

although high hopes may have been set upon him when he started at the

head of the caravan of pilgrims from Babylon. Cyrus may have known him

better, and with the instinct of a king in reading men may have

entrusted the lead to the heir of the Jewish throne, because he saw

there would be no possibility of a dangerous rebellion resulting from

the act of confidence. Haggai's encouragement to Zerubbabel to "be

strong" is in a tone that suggests some weakness on the part of the

Jewish leader. Both the prophets thought that he and his people were

too easily discouraged. It was a part of the prophetic insight to look

below the surface and discover the real secret of failure. The Jews

set down their failure to adverse circumstances; the prophets

attributed it to the character and conduct of the people and their

leaders. Weak men commonly excuse their inactivity by reciting their

difficulties, when stronger men would only regard those difficulties

as furnishing an occasion for extra exertion. That is a most

superficial view of history which regards it as wholly determined by

circumstances. No great nation ever arose on such a principle. The

Greeks who perished at Thermopylæ within a few years of the times we

are now considering are honoured by all the ages as heroes of

patriotism just because they refused to bow to circumstances. Now the

courage which patriots practised in pagan lands is urged upon the Jews

by their prophets from higher considerations. They are to see that

they are weak and cowardly when they sit in dumb despair, crushed by

the weight of external opposition. They have made a mistake in putting

their trust in princes.[39] They have relied too much on Zerubbabel

and too little on God. The failure of the arm of flesh should send

them back to the never-failing out-stretched arm of the Almighty.

[39] Psalm cxviii. 8, 9.

Have we not met with the same mistaken discouragement and the same

deceptive excuses for it in the work of the Church, in missionary

enterprises, in personal lives? Every door is shut against the servant

of God but one, the door of prayer. Forgetting this, and losing sight

of the key of faith that would unlock it, he sits, like Elijah by

Kerith, the picture of abject wretchedness. His great enterprises are

abandoned because he thinks the opposition to them is insuperable. He

forgets that, though his own forces are small, he is the envoy of the

King of kings, who will not suffer him to be worsted if only he

appeals to Heaven for fresh supplies. A dead materialism lies like a

leaden weight on the heart of the Church, and she has not faith enough

to shake it off and claim her great inheritance in all the spiritual

wealth of the Unseen. Many a man cries, like Jacob, "All these things

are against me," not perceiving that, even if they are, no number of

"things" should be permitted to check the course of one who looks

above and beyond what is seen and therefore only temporal to the

eternal resources of God.

This was the message of Zechariah to Zerubbabel: "Not by might, nor by

power, but by My spirit, saith the Lord of hosts. Who art thou, O

great mountain? before Zerubbabel thou shalt become a plain: and he

shall bring forth the head stone with shoutings of Grace, grace unto

it!"[40]

[40] Zech. iv. 6, 7.

Here, then, is the secret of the sudden revival of activity on the

part of the Jews after they had been slicing for years in dumb apathy,

gazing hopelessly on the few stones that had been laid among the ruins

of the old temple. It was not the returning favour of the court under

Darius, it was not the fame of the house of David, it was not the

priestly dignity of the family of Zadok that awakened the slumbering

zeal of the Jews; the movement began in an unofficial source, and it

passed to the people through unofficial channels. It commenced in the

meditations of a calm thinker; it was furthered by the visions of a

rapt seer. This is a clear indication of the fact that the world is

ruled by mind and spirit, not merely by force and authority. Thought

and imagination lie at the springs of action. In the heart of it

history is moulded by ideas. "Big battalions," "the sinews of war,"

"blood and iron," are phrases that suggest only the most external and

therefore the most superficial causes. Beneath them are the _ideas_

that govern all they represent.

Further, the influence of the prophets shows that the ideas which have

most vitality and vigour are moral and spiritual in character. All

thoughts are influential in proportion as they take possession of the

minds and hearts of men and women. There is power in conceptions of

science, philosophy, politics, sociology. But the ideas that touch

people to the quick, the ideas that stir the hidden depths of

consciousness and rouse the slumbering energies of life, are those

that make straight for the conscience. Thus the two prophets exposed

the shame of indolence; they rallied their gloomy fellow-citizens by

high appeals to the sense of right.

Again, this influence was immensely strengthened by its relation to

God. The prophets were more than moralists. The meditations of Marcus

Aurelius could not touch any people as the considerations of the calm

Haggai touched the Jews, for the older prophet, as well as the more

rousing Zechariah, found the spell of his message in its revelation of

God. He made the Jews perceive that they were not deserted by Jehovah;

and directly they felt that God was with them in their work the weak

and timid citizens were able to quit them like men. The irresistible

might of Cromwell's Ironsides at Marston Moor came from their

unwavering faith in their battle-cry, "The Lord of Hosts is with us!"

General Gordon's immeasurable courage is explained when we read his

letters and diaries, and see how he regarded himself as simply an

instrument through whom God wrought. Here, too, is the strong side of

Calvinism.

Then this impression of the power and presence of God in their

destinies was deepened in the Jews by the manifest Divine authority

with which the prophets spake. They prophesied "in the name of the God

of Israel"--the one God of the people of both kingdoms now united in

their representatives. Their "Thus saith the Lord" was the powder that

drove the shot of their message through the toughest hide of apathy.

Except to a Platonist, ideas are impossible apart from the mind that

thinks them. Now the Jews, as well as their prophets, felt that the

great ideas of prophecy could not be the products of pure human

thinking. The sublime character, the moral force, the superb

hopefulness of these ideas proclaimed their Divine origin. As it is

the mission of the prophet to speak for God, so it is the voice of God

in His inspired messenger that awakes the dead and gives strength to

the weak.

This ultimate source of prophecy accounts for its unique character of

hopefulness, and that in turn makes it a powerful encouragement for

the weak and depressed people to whom it is sent. Wordsworth tells us

that we live by "admiration, love, and hope." If one of these three

sources of vitality is lost, life itself shrinks and fades. The man

whose hope has fled has no lustre in his eye, no accent in his voice,

no elasticity in his tread; by his dull and listless attitude he

declares that the life has gone out of him. But the ultimate end of

prophecy is to lead up to a gospel, and the meaning of the word

"gospel" is just that there is a message from God bringing hope to the

despairing. By inspiring a new hope this message kindles a new life.

The Expositor's Bible: Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther · 第 7 / 35 章