1 5 Day short 11 mi. 4 15 4 40 8 _None preaches_

2 6 7* rise 12 32 5 Li 4 41 8 _better than the_

3 7 _windy weather._ 6 15 4 41 8 _ant, and she says_

4 C 2 Sund. p Trinit 6h Sc 4 42 8 First Quarter.

5 2 Vc Jup. Ven. _now_ 7 14 4 43 8 _nothing._

6 3 _pleasant weather_ 8 27 4 44 8 Moon sets 12 30 m

7 4 _some days_ 9 Sa 4 45 8 _The absent are_

8 5 _together,_ 10 23 4 48 8 _never without_

9 6 _but inclines to_ 10 Cp 4 47 8 _fault, nor the_

10 7 _falling_ 11 18 4 48 8 _present without_

11 C 3 Sund. p. Trin. 12 Aq 4 49 8 Full moon 11 day,

12 2 Sxtil Sat. Merc. weather. 1 13 4 50 8 2 afternoon.

13 3 Dog-days begin 2 25 4 50 8 sun in Leo

14 4 Days 14h. 20 m 2h Pi 4 51 8 Moon rise 8 35 aft.

15 5 St. _Swithin_. 3 19 4 52 8 _excuse._

16 6 Le 1 Li 4 Ar 4 53 8

17 7 conj. Sun Merc. _rain_ 5 13 4 54 8 _Gifts burst_

18 C 7* rise 11 40 6 25 4 55 8 _rocks_

19 2 _hail or rain,_ 6h Ta 4 56 8 Last Quarter.

20 3 Sxtil Sun Sat. thunder. 7 19 4 57 8 Moon rise 11 52 af

21 4 7* rise 11 18 8 Gm 4 57 8 _If wind blows on_

22 5 _then high_ 9 14 4 58 8 _you thro' a hole,_

23 6 _wind._ 10 27 4 59 8 _Make your will_

24 7 opp. Sun Jupiter 10 Cn 4 59 8 _and take care of_

25 C St. James. 11 25 5 0 7 _your soul._

26 2 _hail_ 12 Le 5 1 7 New moon 26 day,

27 3 Moon near cor Leo 1 24 5 2 7 near 8 aftern

28 4 opp. Jup. Ven. _a clear_ 2 Vi 5 3 7 Moon sets 8 aftern

29 5 _air; and fine_ 2h 24 5 4 7 _The rotten Apple_

30 6 _weather_ 3 Li 5 5 7 _spoils his_

31 7 7* rise 10 40 4 23 5 6 7 _Companion._

[Transcriber's note: Zodiac signs, aspects and symbols of the planets

have been replaced by their names and/or by their standard

abbreviations.

Ar=Aries, Ta=Taurus, Gm=Gemini, Cn=Cancer, Le=Leo, Vi=Virgo,

Li=Libra, Sc=Scorpio, Sa=Sagittarius, Cp=Capricorn, Aq=Aqua,

Pi=Pisces, Oppos=Opposition, Trine=Trine, Squr=Square,

Conj=Conjunction, Sxtil=Sextile, Qucnx= Quincunx.

Merc=Mercury, Ven=Venus, Mars=Mars, Jup=Jupiter, Sat=Saturn

Ura=Uranus, Nep=Neptune, Plu=Pluto.]

I considered my newspaper, also, as another means of communicating

instruction, and in that view frequently reprinted in it extracts from

the Spectator, and other moral writers; and sometimes publish'd little

pieces of my own, which had been first composed for reading in our

Junto. Of these are a Socratic dialogue, tending to prove that,

whatever might be his parts and abilities, a vicious man could not

properly be called a man of sense; and a discourse on self-denial,

showing that virtue was not secure till its practice became a

habitude, and was free from the opposition of contrary inclinations.

These may be found in the papers about the beginning of 1735.[75]

[75] June 23 and July 7, 1730.--Smyth.

In the conduct of my newspaper, I carefully excluded all libeling and

personal abuse, which is of late years become so disgraceful to our

country. Whenever I was solicited to insert anything of that kind, and

the writers pleaded, as they generally did, the liberty of the press,

and that a newspaper was like a stage-coach, in which anyone who would

pay had a right to a place, my answer was, that I would print the

piece separately if desired, and the author might have as many copies

as he pleased to distribute himself, but that I would not take upon me

to spread his detraction; and that, having contracted with my

subscribers to furnish them with what might be either useful or

entertaining, I could not fill their papers with private altercation,

in which they had no concern, without doing them manifest injustice.

Now, many of our printers make no scruple of gratifying the malice of

individuals by false accusations of the fairest characters among

ourselves, augmenting animosity even to the producing of duels; and

are, moreover, so indiscreet as to print scurrilous reflections on the

government of neighboring states, and even on the conduct of our best

national allies, which may be attended with the most pernicious

consequences. These things I mention as a caution to young printers,

and that they may be encouraged not to pollute their presses and

disgrace their profession by such infamous practices, but refuse

steadily, as they may see by my example that such a course of conduct

will not, on the whole, be injurious to their interests.

In 1733 I sent one of my journeymen to Charleston, South Carolina,

where a printer was wanting. I furnish'd him with a press and letters,

on an agreement of partnership, by which I was to receive one-third of

the profits of the business, paying one-third of the expense. He was a

man of learning, and honest but ignorant in matters of account; and,

tho' he sometimes made me remittances, I could get no account from

him, nor any satisfactory state of our partnership while he lived. On

his decease, the business was continued by his widow, who, being born

and bred in Holland, where, as I have been inform'd, the knowledge of

accounts makes a part of female education, she not only sent me as

clear a state as she could find of the transactions past, but

continued to account with the greatest regularity and exactness every

quarter afterwards, and managed the business with such success, that

she not only brought up reputably a family of children, but, at the

expiration of the term, was able to purchase of me the printing-house,

and establish her son in it.

I mention this affair chiefly for the sake of recommending that branch

of education for our young females, as likely to be of more use to

them and their children, in case of widowhood, than either music or

dancing, by preserving them from losses by imposition of crafty men,

and enabling them to continue, perhaps, a profitable mercantile house,

with establish'd correspondence, till a son is grown up fit to

undertake and go on with it, to the lasting advantage and enriching of

the family.

About the year 1734 there arrived among us from Ireland a young

Presbyterian preacher, named Hemphill, who delivered with a good

voice, and apparently extempore, most excellent discourses, which drew

together considerable numbers of different persuasions, who join'd in

admiring them. Among the rest, I became one of his constant hearers,

his sermons pleasing me, as they had little of the dogmatical kind,

but inculcated strongly the practice of virtue, or what in the

religious stile are called good works. Those, however, of our

congregation, who considered themselves as orthodox Presbyterians,

disapprov'd his doctrine, and were join'd by most of the old clergy,

who arraign'd him of heterodoxy before the synod, in order to have him

silenc'd. I became his zealous partisan, and contributed all I could

to raise a party in his favour, and we combated for him awhile with

some hopes of success. There was much scribbling pro and con upon the

occasion; and finding that, tho' an elegant preacher, he was but a

poor writer, I lent him my pen and wrote for him two or three

pamphlets, and one piece in the Gazette of April, 1735. Those

pamphlets, as is generally the case with controversial writings, tho'

eagerly read at the time, were soon out of vogue, and I question

whether a single copy of them now exists.[76]

[76] See "A List of Books written by, or relating to

Benjamin Franklin," by Paul Leicester Ford. 1889. p.

15.--Smyth.

During the contest an unlucky occurrence hurt his cause exceedingly.

One of our adversaries having heard him preach a sermon that was much

admired, thought he had somewhere read the sermon before, or at least

a part of it. On search, he found that part quoted at length, in one

of the British Reviews, from a discourse of Dr. Foster's.[77] This

detection gave many of our party disgust, who accordingly abandoned

his cause, and occasion'd our more speedy discomfiture in the synod. I

stuck by him, however, as I rather approv'd his giving us good sermons

composed by others, than bad ones of his own manufacture, tho' the

latter was the practice of our common teachers. He afterward

acknowledg'd to me that none of those he preach'd were his own;

adding, that his memory was such as enabled him to retain and repeat

any sermon after one reading only. On our defeat, he left us in search

elsewhere of better fortune, and I quitted the congregation, never

joining it after, tho' I continu'd many years my subscription for the

support of its ministers.

[77] Dr. James Foster (1697-1753):--

"Let modest Foster, if he will excel

Ten metropolitans in preaching well."

--Pope (Epilogue to the Satires, I, 132).

"Those who had not heard Farinelli sing and Foster

preach were not qualified to appear in genteel company,"

Hawkins. "History of Music."--Smyth.

I had begun in 1733 to study languages; I soon made myself so much a

master of the French as to be able to read the books with ease. I then

undertook the Italian. An acquaintance, who was also learning it, us'd

often to tempt me to play chess with him. Finding this took up too

much of the time I had to spare for study, I at length refus'd to play

any more, unless on this condition, that the victor in every game

should have a right to impose a task, either in parts of the grammar

to be got by heart, or in translations, etc., which tasks the

vanquish'd was to perform upon honour, before our next meeting. As we

play'd pretty equally, we thus beat one another into that language. I

afterwards with a little painstaking, acquir'd as much of the Spanish

as to read their books also.

I have already mention'd that I had only one year's instruction in a

Latin school, and that when very young, after which I neglected that

language entirely. But, when I had attained an acquaintance with the

French, Italian, and Spanish, I was surpris'd to find, on looking over

a Latin Testament, that I understood so much more of that language

than I had imagined, which encouraged me to apply myself again to the

study of it, and I met with more success, as those preceding languages

had greatly smooth'd my way.

From these circumstances, I have thought that there is some

inconsistency in our common mode of teaching languages. We are told

that it is proper to begin first with the Latin, and, having acquir'd

that, it will be more easy to attain those modern languages which are

deriv'd from it; and yet we do not begin with the Greek, in order more

easily to acquire the Latin. It is true that, if you can clamber and

get to the top of a staircase without using the steps, you will more

easily gain them in descending; but certainly, if you begin with the

lowest you will with more ease ascend to the top; and I would

therefore offer it to the consideration of those who superintend the

education of our youth, whether, since many of those who begin with

the Latin quit the same after spending some years without having made

any great proficiency, and what they have learnt becomes almost

useless, so that their time has been lost, it would not have been

better to have begun with the French, proceeding to the Italian, etc.;

for, tho', after spending the same time, they should quit the study of

languages and never arrive at the Latin, they would, however, have

acquired another tongue or two, that, being in modern use, might be

serviceable to them in common life.[78]

[78] "The authority of Franklin, the most eminently

practical man of his age, in favor of reserving the

study of the dead languages until the mind has reached a

certain maturity, is confirmed by the confession of one

of the most eminent scholars of any age.

"'Our seminaries of learning,' says Gibbon, 'do not

exactly correspond with the precept of a Spartan king,

that the child should be instructed in the arts which

will be useful to the man; since a finished scholar may

emerge from the head of Westminster or Eton, in total

ignorance of the business and conversation of English

gentlemen in the latter end of the eighteenth century.

But these schools may assume the merit of teaching all

that they pretend to teach, the Latin and Greek

languages.'"--Bigelow.

After ten years' absence from Boston, and having become easy in my

circumstances, I made a journey thither to visit my relations, which I

could not sooner well afford. In returning, I call'd at Newport to see

my brother, then settled there with his printing-house. Our former

differences were forgotten, and our meeting was very cordial and

affectionate. He was fast declining in his health, and requested of me

that, in case of his death, which he apprehended not far distant, I

would take home his son, then but ten years of age, and bring him up

to the printing business. This I accordingly perform'd, sending him a

few years to school before I took him into the office. His mother

carried on the business till he was grown up, when I assisted him with

an assortment of new types, those of his father being in a manner worn

out. Thus it was that I made my brother ample amends for the service I

had depriv'd him of by leaving him so early.

[Illustration: "Our former differences were forgotten, and our

meeting was very cordial and affectionate"]

In 1736 I lost one of my sons, a fine boy of four years old, by the

small-pox, taken in the common way. I long regretted bitterly, and

still regret that I had not given it to him by inoculation. This I

mention for the sake of parents who omit that operation, on the

supposition that they should never forgive themselves if a child died

under it; my example showing that the regret may be the same either

way, and that, therefore, the safer should be chosen.

Our club, the Junto, was found so useful, and afforded such

satisfaction to the members, that several were desirous of introducing

their friends, which could not well be done without exceeding what we

had settled as a convenient number, viz., twelve. We had from the

beginning made it a rule to keep our institution a secret, which was

pretty well observ'd; the intention was to avoid applications of

improper persons for admittance, some of whom, perhaps, we might find

it difficult to refuse. I was one of those who were against any

addition to our number, but, instead of it, made in writing a

proposal, that every member separately should endeavour to form a

subordinate club, with the same rules respecting queries, etc., and

without informing them of the connection with the Junto. The

advantages proposed were, the improvement of so many more young

citizens by the use of our institutions; our better acquaintance with

the general sentiments of the inhabitants on any occasion, as the

Junto member might propose what queries we should desire, and was to

report to the Junto what pass'd in his separate club; the promotion of

our particular interests in business by more extensive recommendation,

and the increase of our influence in public affairs, and our power of

doing good by spreading thro' the several clubs the sentiments of the

Junto.

The project was approv'd, and every member undertook to form his club,

but they did not all succeed. Five or six only were compleated, which

were called by different names, as the Vine, the Union, the Band, etc.

They were useful to themselves, and afforded us a good deal of

amusement, information, and instruction, besides answering, in some

considerable degree, our views of influencing the public opinion on

particular occasions, of which I shall give some instances in course

of time as they happened.

My first promotion was my being chosen, in 1736, clerk of the General

Assembly. The choice was made that year without opposition; but the

year following, when I was again propos'd (the choice, like that of

the members, being annual), a new member made a long speech against

me, in order to favour some other candidate. I was, however, chosen,

which was the more agreeable to me, as, besides the pay for the

immediate service as clerk, the place gave me a better opportunity of

keeping up an interest among the members, which secur'd to me the

business of printing the votes, laws, paper money, and other

occasional jobbs for the public, that, on the whole, were very

profitable.

I therefore did not like the opposition of this new member, who was a

gentleman of fortune and education, with talents that were likely to

give him, in time, great influence in the House, which, indeed,

afterwards happened. I did not, however, aim at gaining his favour by

paying any servile respect to him, but, after some time, took this

other method. Having heard that he had in his library a certain very

scarce and curious book, I wrote a note to him, expressing my desire

of perusing that book, and requesting he would do me the favour of

lending it to me for a few days. He sent it immediately, and I

return'd it in about a week with another note, expressing strongly my

sense of the favour. When we next met in the House, he spoke to me

(which he had never done before), and with great civility; and he ever

after manifested a readiness to serve me on all occasions, so that we

became great friends, and our friendship continued to his death. This

is another instance of the truth of an old maxim I had learned, which

says, _"He that has once done you a kindness will be more ready to do

you another, than he whom you yourself have obliged."_ And it shows

how much more profitable it is prudently to remove, than to resent,

return, and continue inimical proceedings.

In 1737, Colonel Spotswood, late governor of Virginia, and then

postmaster-general, being dissatisfied with the conduct of his deputy

at Philadelphia, respecting some negligence in rendering, and

inexactitude of his accounts, took from him the commission and offered

it to me. I accepted it readily, and found it of great advantage; for,

tho' the salary was small, it facilitated the correspondence that

improv'd my newspaper, increas'd the number demanded, as well as the

advertisements to be inserted, so that it came to afford me a

considerable income. My old competitor's newspaper declin'd

proportionately, and I was satisfy'd without retaliating his refusal,

while postmaster, to permit my papers being carried by the riders.

Thus he suffer'd greatly from his neglect in due accounting; and I

mention it as a lesson to those young men who may be employ'd in

managing affairs for others, that they should always render accounts,

and make remittances, with great clearness and punctuality. The

character of observing such a conduct is the most powerful of all

recommendations to new employments and increase of business.

XI

INTEREST IN PUBLIC AFFAIRS

I began now to turn my thoughts a little to public affairs, beginning,

however, with small matters. The city watch was one of the first

things that I conceiv'd to want regulation. It was managed by the

constables of the respective wards in turn; the constable warned a

number of housekeepers to attend him for the night. Those who chose

never to attend, paid him six shillings a year to be excus'd, which

was suppos'd to be for hiring substitutes, but was, in reality, much

more than was necessary for that purpose, and made the constableship a

place of profit; and the constable, for a little drink, often got such

ragamuffins about him as a watch, that respectable housekeepers did

not choose to mix with. Walking the rounds, too, was often neglected,

and most of the nights spent in tippling. I thereupon wrote a paper to

be read in Junto, representing these irregularities, but insisting

more particularly on the inequality of this six-shilling tax of the

constables, respecting the circumstances of those who paid it, since a

poor widow housekeeper, all whose property to be guarded by the watch

did not perhaps exceed the value of fifty pounds, paid as much as the

wealthiest merchant, who had thousands of pounds' worth of goods in

his stores.

On the whole, I proposed as a more effectual watch, the hiring of

proper men to serve constantly in that business; and as a more

equitable way of supporting the charge, the levying a tax that should

be proportion'd to the property. This idea, being approv'd by the

Junto, was communicated to the other clubs, but as arising in each of

them; and though the plan was not immediately carried into execution,

yet, by preparing the minds of people for the change, it paved the way

for the law obtained a few years after, when the members of our clubs

were grown into more influence.

About this time I wrote a paper (first to be read in Junto, but it was

afterward publish'd) on the different accidents and carelessnesses by

which houses were set on fire, with cautions against them, and means

proposed of avoiding them. This was much spoken of as a useful piece,

and gave rise to a project, which soon followed it, of forming a

company for the more ready extinguishing of fires, and mutual

assistance in removing and securing of goods when in danger.

Associates in this scheme were presently found, amounting to thirty.

Our articles of agreement oblig'd every member to keep always in good

order, and fit for use, a certain number of leather buckets, with

strong bags and baskets (for packing and transporting of goods), which

were to be brought to every fire; and we agreed to meet once a month

and spend a social evening together, in discoursing and communicating

such ideas as occurred to us upon the subjects of fires, as might be

useful in our conduct on such occasions.

The utility of this institution soon appeared, and many more desiring

to be admitted than we thought convenient for one company, they were

advised to form another, which was accordingly done; and this went on,

one new company being formed after another, till they became so

numerous as to include most of the inhabitants who were men of

property; and now, at the time of my writing this, tho' upward of

fifty years since its establishment, that which I first formed, called

the Union Fire Company, still subsists and flourishes, tho' the first

members are all deceas'd but myself and one, who is older by a year

than I am. The small fines that have been paid by members for absence

at the monthly meetings have been apply'd to the purchase of

fire-engines, ladders, fire-hooks, and other useful implements for

each company, so that I question whether there is a city in the world

better provided with the means of putting a stop to beginning

conflagrations; and, in fact, since these institutions, the city has

never lost by fire more than one or two houses at a time, and the

flames have often been extinguished before the house in which they

began has been half consumed.

[Illustration: "the flames have often been extinguished"]

In 1739 arrived among us from Ireland the Reverend Mr. Whitefield,[79]

who had made himself remarkable there as an itinerant preacher. He was

at first permitted to preach in some of our churches; but the clergy,

taking a dislike to him, soon refus'd him their pulpits, and he was

oblig'd to preach in the fields. The multitudes of all sects and

denominations that attended his sermons were enormous, and it was

matter of speculation to me, who was one of the number, to observe the

extraordinary influence of his oratory on his hearers, and how much

they admir'd and respected him, notwithstanding his common abuse of

them, by assuring them they were naturally _half beasts and half

devils_. It was wonderful to see the change soon made in the manners

of our inhabitants. From being thoughtless or indifferent about

religion, it seem'd as if all the world were growing religious, so

that one could not walk thro' the town in an evening without hearing

psalms sung in different families of every street.

[79] George Whitefield, pronounced Hwit'field

(1714-1770), a celebrated English clergyman and pulpit

orator, one of the founders of Methodism.

And it being found inconvenient to assemble in the open air, subject

to its inclemencies, the building of a house to meet in was no sooner

propos'd, and persons appointed to receive contributions, but

sufficient sums were soon receiv'd to procure the ground and erect the

building, which was one hundred feet long and seventy broad, about the

size of Westminster Hall;[80] and the work was carried on with such

spirit as to be finished in a much shorter time than could have been

expected. Both house and ground were vested in trustees, expressly for

the use of any preacher of any religious persuasion who might desire

to say something to the people at Philadelphia; the design in building

not being to accommodate any particular sect, but the inhabitants in

general; so that even if the Mufti of Constantinople were to send a

missionary to preach Mohammedanism to us, he would find a pulpit at

his service.

[80] A part of the palace of Westminster, now forming the

vestibule to the Houses of Parliament in London.

Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin · 第 9 / 17 段