SECTION VI.

CHAP. I.

It is now, however, time for me to pass on to the next doubt which you

propose, viz. “_Why it is requisite that the inspector [who presides

over sacred rites] ought not to touch a dead body, though most sacred

operations are performed through dead bodies?_” Again, therefore, that

we may dissolve this doubt, we shall direct our attention to this

apparent opposition; for there is not in reality any, but these things

_alone seem_ to subsist contrarily. For if the laws of sacred rites

ordered that the same dead bodies should not be touched and should be

touched, this would be a thing contrary to itself. But if they order

that some dead bodies should be abstained from as impure, but that

others which are consecrated should be touched, this is not attended

with any contrariety. Farther still, it is not lawful to touch human

bodies when the soul has left them, since a certain vestige, image, or

representation of divine life is extinguished in the body by death. But

it is no longer unholy to touch other dead bodies, because they did not

[when living] participate of a more divine life. To other Gods,

therefore, who are pure from matter, our not touching dead bodies is

adapted; but to those Gods who preside over animals, and are proximately

connected with them, invocation through animals is properly made.

According to this, therefore, no contrariety takes place.

CHAP. II.

After another manner, also, this doubt may be dissolved. For in men,

indeed, who are detained in matter, bodies deprived of life produce a

certain stain; because that which is not alive inserts a certain

defilement in that which is living, in the same manner as the impure in

that which is pure, and that which is in privation in that which is in

habit; and also because that which is dead produces a certain pollution,

through a physical aptitude to a worse condition, in consequence of

having possessed the power of dying. But a dead body cannot produce any

defilement in a dæmon who is perfectly incorporeal, and does not receive

any corruption. For it is necessary that he should transcend a

corruptible body, and not participate of any representation of

corruption from it. And thus much in answer to the contrariety of the

doubt.

CHAP. III.

In the next place we shall explain how divination is effected through

sacred animals, such, for instance, as hawks. We must never say,

therefore, that the Gods accede through bodies that are thus procured,

being employed. For they do not preside over animals, either partibly,

or proximately, or materially, or with a certain habitude towards them.

But to dæmons and these such as are very much divided, to different

orders of whom different animals are allotted, and who proximately

exercise a government of this kind, and do not obtain their proper

dominion in a way perfectly independent and immaterial, such a contact

with the organs of divination must be ascribed. Or, if some one is

willing so to admit, a seat must be attributed to them, through which we

may be able to associate with and employ them. It is necessary,

therefore, to think that this seat should be pure from bodies. For there

can be no communion whatever between the pure and its contrary; but it

is reasonable to admit that this seat is conjoined with men, through the

soul of animals. For this soul has a certain alliance to men, through

homogeneity of life; but it is allied to dæmons, because, being

liberated from body, it has in a certain respect a separate subsistence.

Hence, being a medium between both, it is subservient to its presiding

dæmon, but announces to those who are yet detained in body that which

its prefect commands. And it imparts to both these a common bond with

each other.

CHAP. IV.

It is necessary, however, to think that the soul which uses divination

of this kind, not only becomes an auditor of the prediction, but also

contributes in no small degree from itself to the consummation of it,

and of what pertains to its operations. For this soul is coexcited and

cooperates, and at the same time foreknows, through a certain necessary

sympathy. Such a mode, therefore, of divination as this is entirely

different from the divine and true mode, being alone able to predict

respecting small and diurnal concerns, _viz._ respecting such as being

placed in a divided nature, are borne along about generation, and which

impart motions from themselves to those things that are able to receive

them, and produce multiform passions in things which are naturally

adapted to be copassive. Perfect foreknowledge, however, can never be

effected through passion. For that which is itself especially immutable,

immaterial, and entirely pure, is accustomed to apprehend the future;

but that which is mingled with the most irrational and dark nature of a

corporeal-formed and material essence is filled with abundant ignorance.

An artificial apparatus, therefore, of this kind does not deserve to be

called divination; nor is it proper to bestow much attention upon it,

nor to believe in any other person who uses it, as if it possessed in

itself a certain clear and known indication of truth. And thus much

concerning divination of this kind.

CHAP. V.

Let us, therefore, now discuss another species of doubts, the cause of

which is occult, and which, as you say, is accompanied with “_violent

threats_.” But it is variously divided about the multitude of threats.

“_For it threatens either to burst the heavens, or to unfold the secrets

of Isis, or to point out the arcanum in the adytum,[119] or to stop

Baris, or to scatter the members of Osiris to Typhon, or to do something

else of the like kind._” Men do not, however, as you think, threaten by

such words as these the sun or the moon, or any of the celestial Gods;

for if they did, more dire absurdities would ensue than those which you

lament. But, as we before observed, there is a certain genus of powers

in the world which is partible, inconsiderate, and most irrational, and

which receives reason from another, and is obedient to it; neither

itself employing a proper intelligence, nor distinguishing what is true

and false, or what is possible or impossible. A genus, therefore, of

this kind, when threatenings are extended, is immediately coexcited and

astonished, because, as it appears to me, it is naturally adapted to be

led by representations, and to allure other things, through an astounded

and unstable phantasy.

CHAP. VI.

These things also admit of another explanation of the following kind.

The theurgist, through the power of arcane signatures, commands mundane

natures, no longer as man, nor as employing a human soul; but as

existing superior to them in the order of the Gods, he makes use of

greater mandates than pertain to himself, so far as he is human. This,

however, does not take place as if he effected every thing which he

vehemently threatens to accomplish; but he teaches us by such a use of

words the magnitude and quality of the power which he possesses through

a union with the Gods, and which he obtains from the knowledge of arcane

symbols. This, likewise, may be said, that the dæmons who are

distributed according to parts, and who guard the parts of the universe,

pay so much attention to the parts over which they preside, that they

cannot endure a word contrary [to the safety of these], but they

preserve the permanency of mundane natures immutable. They preserve this

permanency, therefore, in an unchanged condition, because the order of

the Gods remains invariably the same. Hence they cannot endure even to

hear that threatened in which the aerial and terrestrial dæmons have

their existence.

CHAP. VII.

Or this thing may likewise be explained as follows: Dæmons preside with

a guardian power over arcane mysteries, and this in so remarkable a

degree, because the orderly distribution of things in the universe is

primarily contained in dæmons. For the parts of the universe remain in

order, because the beneficent power of Osiris continues sacred and

undefiled, and is not mingled with any opposing error and perturbation.

The life of all things likewise remains pure and incorruptible, because

the occult vivific beauties of the productive principles in Isis do not

descend into body which is born along,[120] and is the object of sight.

But all things continue immoveable and perpetual, because the course of

the sun is never stopped. And all things remain perfect and entire,

because the arcana in the adytum[121] are never disclosed. Hence, in

those particulars in which the whole of things possesses its safety, I

mean in arcana being always preserved occult, and in the ineffable

essence of the Gods, never receiving a contrary condition; in these,

terrestrial dæmons cannot endure, even in words, to hear that they

subsist otherwise than they do, or that they become profaned; and on

this account threatening language has a certain power when employed

against them. No one, however, threatens the Gods, nor is such a mode of

invocation addressed to them. Hence with the Chaldeans, by whom words

used to the Gods alone are preserved distinct and pure, no threats are

employed. But the Egyptians, mingling dæmoniacal words with divine

signatures, sometimes employ threats. You have, therefore, an answer to

these doubts, concise indeed, but I think sufficiently free from error.

Iamblichus on the mysteries of the Egyptians, Chaldeans, and Assyrians · 第 6 / 11 章