SECTION I. THE NATURE AND FORMS OF SYPHILIS OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM

THE

CASE HISTORY SERIES

CASE HISTORIES IN MEDICINE

BY

RICHARD C. CABOT, M.D.

Third edition, revised and enlarged

CASE HISTORIES IN PEDIATRICS

BY

JOHN LOVETT MORSE, M.D.

Second edition, revised and enlarged

ONE HUNDRED SURGICAL PROBLEMS

BY

JAMES G. MUMFORD, M.D.

Second Printing

CASE HISTORIES IN NEUROLOGY

BY

E. W. TAYLOR, M.D.

Second Printing

CASE HISTORIES IN OBSTETRICS

BY

ROBERT L. DENORMANDIE, M.D.

Second Edition

CASE HISTORIES IN DISEASES OF WOMEN

BY

CHARLES M. GREEN, M.D.

NEUROSYPHILIS

MODERN SYSTEMATIC DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT

Presented in one hundred and thirty-seven Case Histories

BY

E. E. SOUTHARD, M.D., SC.D.

AND

H. C. SOLOMON, M.D.

Being Monograph Number Two of the Psychopathic Hospital, Boston,

Massachusetts. (Monograph Number One was A Point Scale for Measuring

Mental Ability by Robert M. Yerkes, James W. Bridges and Rose S.

Hardwick. Published by Warwick and York. Baltimore 1915.)

[Illustration: METCHNIKOFF WASSERMANN EHRLICH SCHAUDINN NOGUCHI]

NEUROSYPHILIS

MODERN SYSTEMATIC DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT

PRESENTED IN ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY-SEVEN CASE HISTORIES

BY

E. E. SOUTHARD, M.D., Sc.D.,

Bullard Professor of Neuropathology, Harvard Medical School;

Pathologist, Massachusetts Commission on Mental Diseases; Director,

Psychopathic Department, Boston State Hospital; Vice-President, American

Medico-Psychological Association

AND

H. C. SOLOMON, M.D.,

Instructor in Neuropathology and in Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School;

Special Investigator in Brain Syphilis, Massachusetts Commission on

Mental Diseases; Acting Chief-of-Staff, Psychopathic Department, Boston

State Hospital

WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY

JAMES JACKSON PUTNAM, M.D.,

Professor Emeritus of Diseases of the Nervous System, Harvard Medical

School

BY VOTE OF THE TRUSTEES OF THE BOSTON STATE HOSPITAL

MONOGRAPH NUMBER TWO

OF THE

PSYCHOPATHIC HOSPITAL BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS

BOSTON

W. M. LEONARD, PUBLISHER

1917

_Copyright, 1917.

By W. M. Leonard_

=In=

MASSACHUSETTS

A STATE THAT

BOTH TOLERATES AND FOSTERS

RESEARCH

------------------------------------------------------------------------

PREFACE

This book is written primarily for the general practitioner and

secondarily for the syphilographer, the neurologist, and the

psychiatrist. Our material is drawn chiefly from a psychopathic

hospital, that modern type of institution in which the mental problems

of general medical practice come to a diagnostic head weeks, months, or

years before the asylum is thought of.

It is this peculiar nature of psychopathic hospital material—a

concentrated essence of the most difficult daily problems of general

practice—that brings together such an apparent _mélange_ of cases as are

here described, ranging from mild single-symptom diseases like

extraocular palsy up to genuine magazines of symptoms as in general

paresis; from feeblemindedness, apparently simple, up to apparently

simple dotage, both feeblemindedness and dotage really syphilitic; from

the mind-clear tabetic to the maniacal or deluded subject who looks

physically perfectly fit; from the early secondaries to the late

tertiaries or so-called quaternaries; from peracute to the most chronic

of known conditions; from the most delicate character changes to the

profoundest ruin of the psyche.

Although the bulk of our case-material is drawn from general practice

through the thinnest of intermediary membranes, the psychopathic

hospital, yet we have tried to depict the whole story by presenting

enough autopsied cases from district state hospitals to show exactly

what treatment has to face. Nor have we hesitated to insert cases in

which treatment has failed.

In addition to (_a_) the Psychopathic Hospital, Boston, group of

incipient, doubtful, obscure, or complicated cases (the early clinical

group) and (_b_) the Danvers State Hospital, Hathorne, group of

longer-standing, committed, fatal cases (the finished or autopsied

group) we present (_c_) a miscellaneous group of cases, including many

from private neurological or psychiatric practice. No doubt those

familiar with Boston medicine will see traces of the teaching of our

former chiefs, notably Professors James Jackson Putnam and Edward Wyllys

Taylor. We are obliged to them for some well-observed cases.

We have dedicated our work to the Commonwealth, but perhaps we should

more specifically ascribe to the Massachusetts Commission on Mental

Diseases (formerly the State Board of Insanity) the spirit that

permitted our special study of neurosyphilis treatment. To these

authorities, who have countenanced and encouraged a somewhat costly

piece of special work since 1914, we offer our thanks, hoping that other

states will be one by one stimulated to the state-endowment of research.

States doing full duty by research can be counted on one hand.

To our Psychopathic Hospital colleagues and the internes, and especially

to Drs. Myrtelle M. Canavan and Douglas A. Thom of the Commission’s

Pathological Service, we also offer our best thanks.

The Danvers traditions are tangible here: cases of Drs. A. M. Barrett,

H. A. Cotton, H. W. Mitchell, H. M. Swift, and others are presented. We

have been especially aided by the more recent work of Dr. Lawson G.

Lowrey.

Nor should we have been able to present our samples of brain correlation

without drawing on the collection arranged and analyzed by Dr. Annie E.

Taft, Custodian, Harvard Department of Neuropathology. The photographs,

part of a collection of brain photographs now numbering over 10,000

representing 700 brains of all sorts, were made by Mr. Herbert W.

Taylor.

The Wassermann testing work has been done by Dr. W. A. Hinton of the

State Board of Health. Dr. Hinton himself wrote out the text description

of the Wassermann method. The method of his laboratory is held to the

standards of control set by previous chiefs, viz. by Professor F. P.

Gay, who brought immunological methods direct from the laboratory of

Bordet (whose method the Wassermann method essentially is), Prof. W. P.

Lucas, and the late Dr. Emma W. D. Mooers, who had assisted Plaut in his

first work with the Wassermann method in Kraepelin’s Munich Clinic.

The material combed by us to secure this illustrative series amounts to

over 2000 cases of syphilis of the nervous system, including over 100

autopsies in all types of case. We have presented these with very

varying fulness, chiefly to illustrate the contentions at the heads of

the case-descriptions.

In using the book, we suggest early reference to the Summary and Key,

where for convenience are placed numerous cross-references permitting

extended illustration of almost every proposition from several cases.

We have not made a large feature of the Medicolegal and Social section.

This kind of thing well deserves a volume by itself, with all the legal

and social-service implications drawn out in their amazing richness and

detail. The social service slogan, “A paretic’s child is a syphilitic’s

child” has already accomplished a great deal of good in our local world.

Some day we may not be compelled to _drive_ the paretic’s spouse and

offspring to the Wassermann serum test! The general practitioner must

help here.

A note on the Treatment section. This is manifestly not the last word or

even, we hope, our own last word, since the systematic work of the

Massachusetts Commission must be kept up for some years to get a

reliable verdict. Some of the results give rise to greater optimism than

has prevailed in asylum circles, especially re general paresis. We are

confident that _no one can now successfully make a differential

diagnosis between the paretic and the diffuse non-paretic forms of

neurosyphilis in many phases of either disease_, even with all

laboratory refinements. If this be so, it is _improper not to give the

full benefits of modern treatment to all cases in which the diagnosis

remains doubtful_ between the paretic and the diffuse non-paretic forms

of neurosyphilis. We ourselves advocate modern treatment, not only in

the diffuse, but also in early paretic forms of neurosyphilis.

It would have been out of place in a book in this Case History Series to

have dealt extensively with the history of our topic. We have

compensated inadequately for this lack by a few remarks at the head of

the Summary and Key. We are, like all others in the field, under the

inevitable obligation to Nonne of Hamburg, whose great work has gone

into three editions, the second of which has appeared in English

translation (Nonne’s Syphilis of the Nervous System, C. R. Ball,

translator). Mott’s work, embodied in a large volume of the Power-Murphy

System of Syphilis, has also been attentively consulted, as well as the

various systematic works on neurology and psychiatry. The topic of

Neurosyphilis is getting wide and appropriate attention in this country

through special journals, both those dealing with nervous and mental

diseases, and those dealing with syphilis. Syphilis is in a sense the

making of psychiatry and will go far to pushing psychiatry into general

practice.

At the last moment we have been led to deviate from our plan of

presenting only local cases familiar and accessible to us. In a section

on Neurosyphilis and the War, we present excerpts and digests of

English, French, and German cases of neurosyphilis that have appeared in

association with the war. Our own country has not suffered greatly as

yet either from the lighting up of neurosyphilis under martial stress or

from the immediate or remote effects of syphilis obtained in the unholy

congress of Mars and Venus. Space forbids a large collection of these

martial cases, but, as will be seen, a fair sample of problems is

presented.

Speaking for the moment as the senior author of this book, I wish to say

that, were it not for the energy, industry, and ingenuity of the junior

author, Dr. H. C. Solomon, the book would not have been written. Nor, in

all probability, would the systematic work of the Commonwealth on

neurosyphilis and its treatment ever have been begun. I can also accord

the highest praise to Mrs. Maida Herman Solomon for her social-service

work in this new field.

Perhaps, in closing, we owe an apology to John Milton for our borrowings

from the two Paradises. Had he known much about syphilis, Milton might

have written still stronger mottoes for us.

E. E. SOUTHARD

74 FENWOOD ROAD

_Boston, Massachusetts_

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

SECTION I. THE NATURE AND FORMS OF SYPHILIS OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM

(NEUROSYPHILIS). CASES 1 TO 8 17

CASE

1. Paradigm: protean symptoms, nervous and mental. Autopsy, with

meningeal, parenchymatous, and vascular lesions. 17

2. Tabes dorsalis (tabetic neurosyphilis). Autopsy 31

3. General paresis (paretic neurosyphilis). Autopsy 37

4. Cerebral thrombosis (vascular neurosyphilis). Autopsy 42

5. Juvenile paresis (juvenile paretic neurosyphilis). Autopsy 45

6. Extraocular palsy (focal meningeal neurosyphilis). Autopsy 50

7. Gumma of brain (gummatous neurosyphilis). Autopsy 53

8. _Meningitis hypertrophica cervicalis_ (gummatous

neurosyphilis). Autopsy 56

Neurosyphilis · 第 1 / 14 章