HEATHENISM

Schopenhauer somewhere observes that the word heathen, no longer

in reputable use elsewhere, had found a last asylum in Oxford, the

paradise of dead philosophies. Even Oxford, I believe, has now

abandoned it; yet it is a good word. It conveys, as no other word can,

the sense of vast multitudes tossing in darkness, harassed by demons

of their own choice. No doubt it implies also a certain sanctimony in

the superior person who uses it, as if he at least were not chattering

in the general Babel. What justified Jews, Christians, and Moslems

(as Mohammed in particular insisted) in feeling this superiority was

the possession of a Book, a chart of life, as it were, in which the

most important features of history and morals were mapped out for the

guidance of teachable men. The heathen, on the contrary, were abandoned

to their own devices, and even prided themselves on following only

their spontaneous will, their habit, presumption, or caprice.

Most unprejudiced people would now agree that the value of those sacred

histories and rules of life did not depend on their alleged miraculous

origin, [Pg 145] but rather on that solidity and perspicacity in their

authors which enabled them to perceive the laws of sweet and profitable

conduct in this world. It was not religion merely that was concerned,

at least not that outlying, private, and almost negligible sphere to

which we often apply this name; it was the whole fund of experience

mankind had gathered by living; it was wisdom. Now, to record these

lessons of experience, the Greeks and Romans also had their Books;

their history, poetry, science, and civil law. So that while the

theologically heathen may be those who have no Bible, the morally and

essentially heathen are those who possess no authoritative wisdom,

or reject the authority of what wisdom they have; the untaught or

unteachable who disdain not only revelation but what revelation stood

for among early peoples, namely, funded experience.

In this sense the Greeks were the least heathen of men. They were

singularly docile to political experiment, to law, to methodical art,

to the proved limitations and resources of mortal life. This life they

found closely hedged about by sky, earth, and sea, by war, madness, and

conscience with their in-dwelling deities, by oracles and local genii

with their accustomed cults, by a pervasive fate, and the jealousy of

invisible gods. Yet they saw that these divine forces were constant,

and that they exercised [Pg 146] their pressure and bounty with so

much method that a prudent art and religion could be built up in their

midst. All this was simply a poetic prologue to science and the arts;

it largely passed into them, and would have passed into them altogether

if the naturalistic genius of Greece had not been crossed in Socrates

by a premature discouragement, and diverted into other channels.

Early Hebraism itself had hardly been so wise. It had regarded its

tribal and moral interests as absolute, and the Creator as the champion

and omnipotent agent of Israel. But this arrogance and inexperience

were heathen. Soon the ascendency of Israel over nature and history

was proclaimed to be conditional on their fidelity to the Law; and

as the spirit of the nation under chastisement became more and more

penitential, it was absorbed increasingly in the praise of wisdom.

Salvation was to come only by repentance, by being born again with a

will wholly transformed and broken; so that the later Jewish religion

went almost as far as Platonism or Christianity in the direction

opposite to heathenism.

This movement in the direction of an orthodox wisdom was regarded

as a progress in those latter days of antiquity when it occurred,

and it continued to be so regarded in Christendom until the rise of

romanticism. The most radical reformers simply [Pg 147] urged that

the current orthodoxy, religious or scientific, was itself imperfectly

orthodox, being corrupt, overloaded, too vague, or too narrow. As

every actual orthodoxy is avowedly incomplete and partly ambiguous,

a sympathetic reform of it is always in order. Yet very often the

reformers are deceived. What really offends them may not be what is

false in the received orthodoxy, but what though true is uncongenial to

them. In that case heathenism, under the guise of a search for a purer

wisdom, is working in their souls against wisdom of any sort. Such is

the suspicion that Catholics would throw on Protestantism, naturalists

on idealism, and conservatives generally on all revolutions.

But if ever heathenism needed to pose as constructive reform, it is now

quite willing and able to throw off the mask. Desire for any orthodox

wisdom at all may be repudiated; it may be set down to low vitality

and failure of nerve. In various directions at once we see to-day an

intense hatred and disbelief gathering head against the very notion of

a cosmos to be discovered, or a stable human nature to be respected.

Nature, we are told, is an artificial symbol employed by life; truth

is a temporary convention; art is an expression of personality; war

is better than peace, effort than achievement, and feeling than

intelligence; change is deeper than [Pg 148] form; will is above

morality. Expressions of this kind are sometimes wanton and only half

thought out; but they go very deep in the subjective direction. Behind

them all is a sincere revulsion against the difficult and confused

undertakings of reason; against science, institutions, and moral

compulsions. They mark an honest retreat into immediate experience

and animal faith. Man used to be called a rational animal, but his

rationality is something eventual and ideal, whereas his animality is

actual and profound. Heathenism, if we consider life at large, is the

primal and universal religion.

It has never been my good fortune to see wild beasts in the jungle,

but I have sometimes watched a wild bull in the ring, and I can

imagine no more striking, simple, and heroic example of animal faith;

especially when the bull is what is technically called noble, that

is, when he follows the lure again and again with eternal singleness

of thought, eternal courage, and no suspicion of a hidden agency that

is mocking him. What the red rag is to this brave creature, their

passions, inclinations, and chance notions are to the heathen. What

they will they will; and they would deem it weakness and disloyalty

to ask whether it is worth willing or whether it is attainable. The

bull, magnificently sniffing the air, surveys the arena with the cool

contempt and [Pg 149] disbelief of the idealist, as if he said: "You

seem, you are a seeming; I do not quarrel with you, I do not fear you.

I am real, you are nothing." Then suddenly, when his eye is caught by

some bright cloak displayed before him, his whole soul changes. His

will awakes and he seems to say: "You are my destiny; I want you, I

hate you, you shall be mine, you shall not stand in my path. I will

gore you. I will disprove you. I will pass beyond you. I shall be, you

shall not have been." Later, when sorely wounded and near his end, he

grows blind to all these excitements. He smells the moist earth, and

turns to the dungeon where an hour ago he was at peace. He remembers

the herd, the pasture beyond, and he dreams: "I shall not die, for I

love life. I shall be young again, young always, for I love youth. All

this outcry is nought to me, this strange suffering is nought. I will

go to the fields again, to graze, to roam, to love."

So exactly, with not one least concession to the unsuspected reality,

the heathen soul stands bravely before a painted world, covets some

bauble, and defies death. Heathenism is the religion of will, the faith

which life has in itself because it is life, and in its aims because it

is pursuing them.

In their tentative, many-sided, indomitable way, the Germans have been

groping for four hundred [Pg 150] years towards a restoration of their

primitive heathenism. Germany under the long tutelage of Rome had

been like a spirited and poetic child brought up by very old and very

worldly foster-parents. For many years the elfin creature may drink in

their gossip and their maxims with simple wonder; but at last he will

begin to be restive under them, ask himself ominous questions, protest,

suffer, and finally break into open rebellion. Naturally he will not

find at first theories and precepts of his own to take the place of his

whole education; he will do what he can with his traditions, revising,

interpreting, and patching them with new ideas; and only if he has

great earnestness and speculative power will he ever reach an unalloyed

expression of his oppressed soul.

Now in Germany speculative power and earnestness existed in a high

degree, not, of course, in most people, but in the best and most

representative; and it was this _élite_ that made the Reformation, and

carried it on into historical criticism and transcendental philosophy,

until in the nineteenth century, in Schopenhauer, Wagner, and

Nietzsche, the last remnants of Christian education were discarded and

the spontaneous heathen morality of the race reasserted itself in its

purity. That this assertion was not consistent, that it was thrown into

the language and images of some alien system, is not to be [Pg 151]

wondered at; but the Christianity of Parsifal, like the Buddhism of the

denial of the will, is a pure piece of romanticism, an exotic setting

for those vacillations and sinkings which absolute Will may very well

be subject to in its absolute chaos.

The rebellion of the heathen soul is unmistakable in the Reformation,

but it is not recognised in this simple form, because those who feel

that it was justified do not dream that it was heathen, and those

who see that it was heathen will not admit that it was justified.

Externally, of course, it was an effort to recover the original essence

of Christianity; but why should a free and absolute being care for

that original essence when he has discovered it, unless his own mind

demanded that very thing? And if his mind demanded it, what need has

he to read that demand into an ancient revelation which, as a matter

of fact, turned on quite other matters? It was simply the inertia

of established prejudice that made people use tradition to correct

tradition; until the whole substance of tradition, worn away by that

internal friction, should be dissolved, and impulse and native genius

should assert themselves unimpeded.

Judaism and Christianity, like Greek philosophy, were singly inspired

by the pursuit of happiness, in whatever form it might be really

attainable: now [Pg 152] on earth if possible, or in the millennium,

or in some abstracted and inward life, like that of the Stoics,

or in the last resort, in a different life altogether beyond the

grave. But heathenism ignores happiness, despises it, or thinks it

impossible. The regimen and philosophy of Germany are inspired by this

contempt for happiness, for one's own happiness as well as for other

people's. Happiness seems to the German moralists something unheroic,

an abdication before external things, a victory of the senses over

the will. They think the pursuit of happiness low, materialistic,

and selfish. They wish everybody to sacrifice or rather to forget

happiness, and to do "deeds."

It is in the nature of things that those who are incapable of happiness

should have no idea of it. Happiness is not for wild animals, who

can only oscillate between apathy and passion. To be happy, even to

conceive happiness, you must be reasonable or (if Nietzsche prefers

the word) you must be tamed. You must have taken the measure of your

powers, tasted the fruits of your passions and learned your place in

the world and what things in it can really serve you. To be happy you

must be wise. This happiness is sometimes found instinctively, and

then the rudest fanatic can hardly fail to see how lovely it is; but

sometimes it comes of having learned something by experience (which

empirical people never [Pg 153] do) and involves some chastening

and renunciation; but it is not less sweet for having this touch of

holiness about it, and the spirit of it is healthy and beneficent. The

nature of happiness, therefore, dawns upon philosophers when their

wisdom begins to report the lessons of experience: an _a priori_

philosophy can have no inkling of it.

Happiness is the union of vitality with art, and in so far as vitality

is a spiritual thing and not mere restlessness and vehemence, art

increases vitality. It obviates friction, waste, and despair. Without

art, vitality is painful and big with monsters. It is hurried easily

into folly and crime; it ignores the external forces and interests

which it touches. German philosophy does this theoretically, by

dethroning the natural world and calling it an idea created by the ego

for its own purposes; and it does this practically also by obeying the

categorical imperative--no longer the fabled imperatives of Sinai

or of Königsberg, but the inward and vital imperative which the bull

obeys, when trusting absolutely in his own strength, rage, and courage,

he follows a little red rag and his destiny this way and that way.

[Pg 154] CHAPTER XV

Egotism in German Philosophy · 第 18 / 24 题