Late Professor of Philosophy in Harvard University

London and Toronto

J. M. Dent & Sons Limited

New York: Charles Scribner's Sons

1916

[Pg 5]

PREFACE

This book is one of the many that the present war has brought forth,

but it is the fruit of a long gestation. During more than twenty years,

while I taught philosophy at Harvard College, I had continual occasion

to read and discuss German metaphysics. From the beginning it wore in

my eyes a rather questionable shape. Under its obscure and fluctuating

tenets I felt something sinister at work, something at once hollow and

aggressive. It seemed a forced method of speculation, producing more

confusion than it found, and calculated chiefly to enable practical

materialists to call themselves idealists and rationalists to remain

theologians. At the same time the fear that its secret might be eluding

me, seeing that by blood and tradition I was perhaps handicapped in the

matter, spurred me to great and prolonged efforts to understand what

confronted me so bewilderingly. I wished to be as clear and just about

it as I could--more clear and just, indeed, than it ever was about

itself.

For the rest, German philosophy was never my chief interest, and I

write frankly as an outsider, with no professorial pretensions; merely

using my common [Pg 6] reason in the presence of claims put forth by

others to a logical authority and a spiritual supremacy which they are

far from possessing.

A reader indoctrinated in the German schools is, therefore, free not

to read further. My object is neither to repeat his familiar arguments

in their usual form, nor to refute them; my object is to describe them

intelligibly and to judge them from the point of view of the layman,

and in his interests. For those who wish to study German philosophy,

the original authors are at hand: all I would give here is the aroma of

German philosophy that has reached my nostrils. If the reader has smelt

something of the kind, so much the better: we shall then understand

each other. The function of history or of criticism is not passively

to reproduce its subject-matter. One real world, with one stout corpus

of German philosophy, is enough. Reflection and description are things

superadded, things which ought to be more winged and more selective

than what they play upon. They are echoes of reality in the sphere

of art, sketches which may achieve all the truth appropriate to them

without belying their creative limitations: for their essence is to be

intellectual symbols, at once indicative and original.

Egotism--subjectivity in thought and wilfulness in

morals--which is the soul of German philosophy, [Pg 7] is

by no means a gratuitous thing. It is a genuine expression of the

pathetic situation in which any animal finds itself upon earth, and

any intelligence in the universe. It is an inevitable and initial

circumstance in life. But like every material accident, it is a thing

to abstract from and to discount as far as possible. The perversity of

the Germans, the childishness and sophistry of their position, lies

only in glorifying what is an inevitable impediment, and in marking

time on an earthly station from which the spirit of man--at least

in spirit--is called to fly.

This glorified and dogged egotism, which a thousand personal and

technical evidences had long revealed to me in German philosophy,

might now, I should think, be evident to the whole world. Not that

the German philosophers are responsible for the war, or for that

recrudescence of corporate fanaticism which prepared it from afar. They

merely shared and justified prophetically that spirit of uncompromising

self-assertion and metaphysical conceit which the German nation is now

reducing to action. It is a terrible thing to have a false religion,

all the more terrible the deeper its sources are in the human soul.

Like many a false religion before it, this which now inspires the

Germans has made a double assault upon mankind, one with the secular

arm, and another by solemn asseverations and sophistries. This

assault, [Pg 8] though its incidental methods may be dubious, has been

bold and honest enough in principle. It has been like those which

all conquerors and all founders of militant religions have made at

intervals against liberty or reason. And the issue will doubtless be

the same. Liberty may be maimed, but not killed; reason may be bent,

but not broken. The dark aggression is to be repelled, if possible, by

force of arms; but failing that, it will be nullified in time by the

indomitable moral resistance which maturer races, richer in wisdom, can

exert successfully against the rude will of the conqueror.

[Pg 9]

CONTENTS

I. THE GENERAL CHARACTER OF GERMAN PHILOSOPHY

II. THE PROTESTANT HERITAGE

III. TRANSCENDENTALISM

IV. HINTS OF EGOTISM IN GOETHE

V. SEEDS OF EGOTISM IN KANT

VI. TRANSCENDENTALISM PERFECTED

VII. FICHTE ON THE MISSION OF GERMANY

VIII. THE EGOTISM OF IDEAS

IX. EGOTISM AND SELFISHNESS

X. THE BREACH WITH CHRISTIANITY

XI. NIETZSCHE AND SCHOPENHAUER

XII. THE ETHICS OF NIETZSCHE

XIII. THE SUPERMAN

XIV. HEATHENISM

XV. GERMAN GENIUS

XVI. EGOTISM IN PRACTICE

INDEX

Egotism in German Philosophy · 第 3 / 24 题