Section 15 of said act, after numerous provisions therein to prevent an

evasion of the fifteenth amendment, provides that the jurisdiction of

the circuit court of the United States shall extend to all cases in

law or equity arising under the provisions of said act and of the act

amendatory thereof. Congress seems to have contemplated equitable as

well as legal proceedings to prevent the denial of suffrage to colored

citizens; and it may be safely asserted that if Kellogg's bill in the

above-named case did not present a case for the equitable interposition

of the court, that no such case can arise under the act. That the courts

of the United States have the right to interfere in various ways with

State elections so as to maintain political equality and rights therein,

irrespective of race or color, is comparatively a new, and to some seems

to be a startling, idea, but it results as clearly from the fifteenth

amendment to the Constitution and the acts that have been passed to

enforce that amendment as the abrogation of State laws upholding slavery

results from the thirteenth amendment to the Constitution. While the

jurisdiction of the court in the case of Kellogg _vs_. Warmoth and

others is clear to my mind, it seems that some of the orders made by the

judge in that and the kindred case of Antoine were illegal. But while

they are so held and considered, it is not to be forgotten that the

mandate of his court had been contemptuously defied, and they were made

while wild scenes of anarchy were sweeping away all restraint of law

and order. Doubtless the judge of this court made grave mistakes; but

the law allows the chancellor great latitude, not only in punishing

those who contemn his orders and injunctions, but in preventing the

consummation of the wrong which he has judicially forbidden. Whatever

may be said or thought of those matters, it was only made known to me

that process of the United States court was resisted, and as said act

especially provides for the use of the Army and Navy when necessary to

enforce judicial process arising thereunder, I considered it my duty

to see that such process was executed according to the judgment of

the court.

Resulting from these proceedings, through various controversies and

complications, a State administration was organized with William P.

Kellogg as governor, which, in the discharge of my duty under section 4,

Article IV, of the Constitution, I have recognized as the government of

the State.

It has been bitterly and persistently alleged that Kellogg was not

elected. Whether he was or not is not altogether certain, nor is it any

more certain that his competitor, McEnery, was chosen. The election

was a gigantic fraud, and there are no reliable returns of its result.

Kellogg obtained possession of the office, and in my opinion has more

right to it than his competitor.

On the 20th of February, 1873, the Committee on Privileges and Elections

of the Senate made a report in which they say they were satisfied by

testimony that the manipulation of the election machinery by Warmoth and

others was equivalent to 20,000 votes; and they add that to recognize

the McEnery government "would be recognizing a government based upon

fraud, in defiance of the wishes and intention of the voters of the

State." Assuming the correctness of the statements in this report (and

they seem to have been generally accepted by the country), the great

crime in Louisiana, about which so much has been said, is that one is

holding the office of governor who was cheated out of 20,000 votes,

against another whose title to the office is undoubtedly based on fraud

and in defiance of the wishes and intentions of the voters of the State.

Misinformed and misjudging as to the nature and extent of this report,

the supporters of McEnery proceeded to displace by force in some

counties of the State the appointees of Governor Kellogg, and on the

13th of April, in an effort of that kind, a butchery of citizens was

committed at Colfax, which in bloodthirstiness and barbarity is hardly

surpassed by any acts of savage warfare.

To put this matter beyond controversy I quote from the charge of Judge

Woods, of the United States circuit court, to the jury in the case of

The United States _vs_. Cruikshank and others, in New Orleans in March,

1874. He said:

In the case on trial there are many facts not in controversy. I proceed

to state some of them in the presence and hearing of counsel on both

sides; and if I state as a conceded fact any matter that is disputed,

they can correct me.

After stating the origin of the difficulty, which grew out of an attempt

of white persons to drive the parish judge and sheriff, appointees of

Kellogg, from office, and their attempted protection by colored persons,

which led to some fighting, in which quite a number of negroes were

killed, the judge states:

Most of those who were not killed were taken prisoners. Fifteen or

sixteen of the blacks had lifted the boards and taken refuge under the

floor of the court-house. They were all captured. About thirty-seven men

were taken prisoners. The number is not definitely fixed. They were kept

under guard until dark. They were led out, two by two, and shot. Most of

the men were shot to death. A few were wounded, not mortally, and by

pretending to be dead were afterwards, during the night, able to make

their escape. Among them was the Levi Nelson named in the indictment.

The dead bodies of the negroes killed in this affair were left unburied

until Tuesday, April 15, when they were buried by a deputy marshal and

an officer of the militia from New Orleans. These persons found

fifty-nine dead bodies. They showed pistol-shot wounds, the great

majority in the head, and most of them in the back of the head. In

addition to the fifty-nine dead bodies found, some charred remains of

dead bodies were discovered near the court-house. Six dead bodies were

found under a warehouse, all shot in the head but one or two, which were

shot in the breast.

The only white men injured from the beginning of these troubles to their

close were Hadnot and Harris. The court-house and its contents were

entirely consumed.

There is no evidence that anyone in the crowd of whites bore any lawful

warrant for the arrest of any of the blacks. There is no evidence that

either Nash or Cazabat, after the affair, ever demanded their offices,

to which they had set up claim, but Register continued to act as parish

judge and Shaw as sheriff.

These are facts in this case as I understand them to be admitted.

To hold the people of Louisiana generally responsible for these

atrocities would not be just, but it is a lamentable fact that

insuperable obstructions were thrown in the way of punishing these

murderers; and the so-called conservative papers of the State not only

justified the massacre, but denounced as Federal tyranny and despotism

the attempt of the United States officers to bring them to justice.

Fierce denunciations ring through the country about office holding and

election matters in Louisiana, while every one of the Colfax miscreants

goes unwhipped of justice, and no way can be found in this boasted land

of civilization and Christianity to punish the perpetrators of this

bloody and monstrous crime.

Not unlike this was the massacre in August last. Several Northern young

men of capital and enterprise had started the little and flourishing

town of Coushatta. Some of them were Republicans and officeholders under

Kellogg. They were therefore doomed to death. Six of them were seized

and carried away from their homes and murdered in cold blood. No one has

been punished, and the conservative press of the State denounced all

efforts to that end and boldly justified the crime.

Many murders of a like character have been committed in individual

cases, which can not here be detailed. For example, T.S. Crawford,

judge, and P.H. Harris, district attorney, of the twelfth judicial

district of the State, on their way to court were shot from their horses

by men in ambush on the 8th of October, 1873; and the widow of the

former, in a communication to the Department of Justice, tells a piteous

tale of the persecutions of her husband because he was a Union man, and

of the efforts made to screen those who had committed a crime which, to

use her own language, "left two widows and nine orphans desolate."

To say that the murder of a negro or a white Republican is not

considered a crime in Louisiana would probably be unjust to a great part

of the people, but it is true that a great number of such murders have

been committed and no one has been punished therefor; and manifestly,

as to them, the spirit of hatred and violence is stronger than law.

Representations were made to me that the presence of troops in Louisiana

was unnecessary and irritating to the people, and that there was no

danger of public disturbance if they were taken away. Consequently early

in last summer the troops were all withdrawn from the State, with the

exception of a small garrison at New Orleans Barracks. It was claimed

that a comparative state of quiet had supervened. Political excitement

as to Louisiana affairs seemed to be dying out. But the November

election was approaching, and it was necessary for party purposes that

the flame should be rekindled.

Accordingly, on the 14th of September D.P. Penn, claiming that he was

elected lieutenant-governor in 1872, issued an inflammatory proclamation

calling upon the militia of the State to arm, assemble, and drive from

power the usurpers, as he designated the officers of the State. The

White Leagues, armed and ready for the conflict, promptly responded.

On the same day the governor made a formal requisition upon me, pursuant

to the act of 1795 and section 4, Article IV, of the Constitution,

to aid in suppressing domestic violence. On the next day I issued my

proclamation[1] commanding the insurgents to disperse within five days

from the date thereof; but before the proclamation was published in New

Orleans the organized and armed forces recognizing a usurping governor

had taken forcible possession of the statehouse and temporarily

subverted the government. Twenty or more people were killed, including a

number of the police of the city. The streets of the city were stained

with blood. All that was desired in the way of excitement had been

accomplished, and, in view of the steps taken to repress it, the

revolution is apparently, though it is believed not really, abandoned,

and the cry of Federal usurpation and tyranny in Louisiana was renewed

with redoubled energy. Troops had been sent to the State under this

requisition of the governor, and as other disturbances seemed imminent

they were allowed to remain there to render the executive such aid as

might become necessary to enforce the laws of the State and repress the

continued violence which seemed inevitable the moment Federal support

should be withdrawn.

Prior to, and with a view to, the late election in Louisiana white men

associated themselves together in armed bodies called "White Leagues,"

and at the same time threats were made in the Democratic journals of the

State that the election should be carried against the Republicans at all

hazards, which very naturally greatly alarmed the colored voters. By

section 8 of the act of February 28, 1871, it is made the duty of United

States marshals and their deputies at polls where votes are cast for

Representatives in Congress to keep the peace and prevent any violations

of the so-called enforcement acts and other offenses against the laws of

the United States; and upon a requisition of the marshal of Louisiana,

and in view of said armed organizations and other portentous

circumstances, I caused detachments of troops to be stationed in various

localities in the State, to aid him in the performance of his official

duties. That there was intimidation of Republican voters at the

election, notwithstanding these precautions, admits of no doubt.

The following are specimens of the means used:

On the 14th of October eighty persons signed and published the following

at Shreveport:

We, the undersigned, merchants of the city of Shreveport, in obedience

to a request of the Shreveport Campaign Club, agree to use every

endeavor to get our employees to vote the People's ticket at the

ensuing election, and in the event of their refusal so to do, or in

case they vote the Radical ticket, to refuse to employ them at the

expiration of their present contracts.

On the same day another large body of persons published in the same

place a paper in which they used the following language:

We, the undersigned, merchants of the city of Shreveport, alive to the

great importance of securing good and honest government to the State,

do agree and pledge ourselves not to advance any supplies or money to

any planter the coming year who will give employment or rent lands to

laborers who vote the Radical ticket in the coming election.

I have no information of the proceedings of the returning board for said

election which may not be found in its report, which has been published;

but it is a matter of public information that a great part of the time

taken to canvass the votes was consumed by the arguments of lawyers,

several of whom represented each party before the board. I have no

evidence that the proceedings of this board were not in accordance with

the law under which they acted. Whether in excluding from their count

certain returns they were right or wrong is a question that depends upon

the evidence they had before them; but it is very clear that the law

gives them the power, if they choose to exercise it, of deciding that

way, and, _prima facie_, the persons whom they return as elected are

entitled to the offices for which they were candidates.

Respecting the alleged interference by the military with the

organization of the legislature of Louisiana on the 4th instant,

I have no knowledge or information which has not been received by

me since that time and published. My first information was from the

papers of the morning of the 5th of January. I did not know that any

such thing was anticipated, and no orders nor suggestions were ever

given to any military officer in that State upon that subject prior

to the occurrence. I am well aware that any military interference by

the officers or troops of the United States with the organization of

the State legislature or any of its proceedings, or with any civil

department of the Government, is repugnant to our ideas of government.

I can conceive of no case, not involving rebellion or insurrection,

where such interference by authority of the General Government ought to

be permitted or can be justified. But there are circumstances connected

with the late legislative imbroglio in Louisiana which seem to exempt

the military from any intentional wrong in that matter. Knowing that

they had been placed in Louisiana to prevent domestic violence and aid

in the enforcement of the State laws, the officers and troops of the

United States may well have supposed that it was their duty to act

when called upon by the governor for that purpose.

Each branch of a legislative assembly is the judge of the election

and qualifications of its own members; but if a mob or a body of

unauthorized persons seize and hold the legislative hall in a tumultuous

and riotous manner, and so prevent any organization by those legally

returned as elected, it might become the duty of the State executive to

interpose, if requested by a majority of the members elect, to suppress

the disturbance and enable the persons elected to organize the house.

Any exercise of this power would only be justifiable under most

extraordinary circumstances, and it would then be the duty of the

governor to call upon the constabulary or, if necessary, the military

force of the State. But with reference to Louisiana, it is to be borne

in mind that any attempt by the governor to use the police force of that

State at this time would have undoubtedly precipitated a bloody conflict

with the White League, as it did on the 14th of September.

There is no doubt but that the presence of the United States troops upon

that occasion prevented bloodshed and the loss of life. Both parties

appear to have relied upon them as conservators of the public peace.

The first call was made by the Democrats, to remove persons obnoxious

to them from the legislative halls; and the second was from the

Republicans, to remove persons who had usurped seats in the legislature

without legal certificates authorizing them to seats, and in sufficient

number to change the majority.

Nobody was disturbed by the military who had a legal right at that time

to occupy a seat in the legislature. That the Democratic minority of the

house undertook to seize its organization by fraud and violence; that in

this attempt they trampled under foot law; that they undertook to make

persons not returned as elected members, so as to create a majority;

that they acted under a preconcerted plan, and under false pretenses

introduced into the hall a body of men to support their pretensions by

force if necessary, and that conflict, disorder, and riotous proceedings

followed are facts that seem to be well established; and I am credibly

informed that these violent proceedings were a part of a premeditated

plan to have the house organized in this way, recognize what has been

called the McEnery senate, then to depose Governor Kellogg, and so

revolutionize the State government.

Whether it was wrong for the governor, at the request of the majority of

the members returned as elected to the house, to use such means as were

in his power to defeat these lawless and revolutionary proceedings is

perhaps a debatable question; but it is quite certain that there would

have been no trouble if those who now complain of illegal interference

had allowed the house to be organized in a lawful and regular manner.

When those who inaugurate disorder and anarchy disavow such proceedings,

it will be time enough to condemn those who by such means as they have

prevent the success of their lawless and desperate schemes.

Lieutenant-General Sheridan was requested by me to go to Louisiana

to observe and report the situation there, and, if in his opinion

necessary, to assume the command, which he did on the 4th instant, after

the legislative disturbances had occurred, at 9 o'clock p.m., a number

of hours after the disturbances. No party motives nor prejudices can

reasonably be imputed to him; but honestly convinced by what he has seen

and heard there, he has characterized the leaders of the White Leagues

in severe terms and suggested summary modes of procedure against them,

which, though they can not be adopted, would, if legal, soon put an

end to the troubles and disorders in that State. General Sheridan was

looking at facts, and possibly, not thinking of proceedings which would

be the only proper ones to pursue in time of peace, thought more of the

utterly lawless condition of society surrounding him at the time of his

dispatch and of what would prove a sure remedy. He never proposed to do

an illegal act nor expressed determination to proceed beyond what the

law in the future might authorize for the punishment of the atrocities

which have been committed, and the commission of which can not be

successfully denied. It is a deplorable fact that political crimes and

murders have been committed in Louisiana which have gone unpunished,

and which have been justified or apologized for, which must rest as a

reproach upon the State and country long after the present generation

has passed away.

I have no desire to have United States troops interfere in the domestic

concerns of Louisiana or any other State.

On the 9th of December last Governor Kellogg telegraphed to me his

apprehensions that the White League intended to make another attack upon

the statehouse, to which, on the same day, I made the following answer,

since which no communication has been sent to him:

Your dispatch of this date just received. It is exceedingly unpalatable

to use troops in anticipation of danger. Let the State authorities be

right, and then proceed with their duties without apprehension of

danger. If they are then molested, the question will be determined

whether the United States is able to maintain law and order within its

limits or not.

I have deplored the necessity which seemed to make it my duty under the

Constitution and laws to direct such interference. I have always refused

except where it seemed to be my imperative duty to act in such a manner

under the Constitution and laws of the United States. I have repeatedly

and earnestly entreated the people of the South to live together in

peace and obey the laws; and nothing would give me greater pleasure than

to see reconciliation and tranquillity everywhere prevail, and thereby

remove all necessity for the presence of troops among them. I regret,

however, to say that this state of things does not exist, nor does its

existence seem to be desired, in some localities; and as to those it may

be proper for me to say that to the extent that Congress has conferred

power upon me to prevent it neither Kuklux Klans, White Leagues, nor

any other association using arms and violence to execute their unlawful

purposes can be permitted in that way to govern any part of this

country; nor can I see with indifference Union men or Republicans

ostracized, persecuted, and murdered on account of their opinions,

as they now are in some localities.

I have heretofore urged the case of Louisiana upon the attention of

Congress, and I can not but think that its inaction has produced great

evil.

To summarize: In September last an armed, organized body of men, in the

support of candidates who had been put in nomination for the offices of

governor and lieutenant-governor at the November election in 1872, and

who had been declared not elected by the board of canvassers, recognized

by all the courts to which the question had been submitted, undertook to

subvert and overthrow the State government that had been recognized by

me in accordance with previous precedents. The recognized governor was

driven from the statehouse, and but for his finding shelter in the

United States custom-house, in the capital of the State of which he was

governor, it is scarcely to be doubted that he would have been killed.

From the statehouse, before he had been driven to the custom-house, a

call was made, in accordance with the fourth section, fourth article,

of the Constitution of the United States, for the aid of the General

Government to suppress domestic violence. Under those circumstances, and

in accordance with my sworn duties, my proclamation[91] of the 15th of

September, 1874, was issued. This served to reinstate Governor Kellogg

to his position nominally, but it can not be claimed that the insurgents

have to this day surrendered to the State authorities the arms belonging

to the State, or that they have in any sense disarmed. On the contrary,

it is known that the same armed organizations that existed on the 14th

of September, 1874, in opposition to the recognized State government,

still retain their organization, equipments, and commanders, and can

be called out at any hour to resist the State government. Under these

circumstances the same military force has been continued in Louisiana

as was sent there under the first call, and under the same general

instructions. I repeat that the task assumed by the troops is not a

pleasant one to them; that the Army is not composed of lawyers, capable

of judging at a moment's notice of just how far they can go in the

maintenance of law and order, and that it was impossible to give

specific instructions providing for all possible contingencies that

might arise. The troops were bound to act upon the judgment of the

commanding officer upon each sudden contingency that arose, or wait

instructions which could only reach them after the threatened wrongs

had been committed which they were called on to prevent. It should be

recollected, too, that upon my recognition of the Kellogg government

I reported the fact, with the grounds of recognition, to Congress, and

asked that body to take action in the matter; otherwise I should regard

their silence as an acquiescence in my course. No action has been taken

by that body, and I have maintained the position then marked out.

If error has been committed by the Army in these matters, it has always

been on the side of the preservation of good order, the maintenance of

law, and the protection of life. Their bearing reflects credit upon the

soldiers, and if wrong has resulted the blame is with the turbulent

element surrounding them.

I now earnestly ask that such action be taken by Congress as to leave my

duties perfectly clear in dealing with the affairs of Louisiana, giving

assurance at the same time that whatever may be done by that body in the

premises will be executed according to the spirit and letter of the law,

without fear or favor.

I herewith transmit copies of documents containing more specific

information as to the subject-matter of the resolution.

U.S. GRANT.

[Footnote 90: See pp. 276-277.]

[Footnote 91: See pp. 275-277.]

EXECUTIVE MANSION, _January 14, 1875_.

_To the Senate of the United States_:

Senate bill No. 1044, "to provide for the resumption of specie

payments," is before me, and this day receives my signature of approval.

I venture upon this unusual method of conveying the notice of approval

to the "House in which the measure originated" because of its great

importance to the country at large and in order to suggest further

legislation which seems to me essential to make this law effective.

It is a subject of congratulation that a measure has become law which

fixes a date when specie resumption shall commence and implies an

obligation on the part of Congress, if in its power, to give such

legislation as may prove necessary to redeem this promise.

To this end I respectfully call your attention to a few suggestions:

First. The necessity of an increased revenue to carry out the obligation

of adding to the sinking fund annually 1 per cent of the public debt,

amounting now to about $34,000,000 per annum, and to carry out the

promises of this measure to redeem, under certain contingencies, eighty

millions of the present legal-tenders, and, without contingency, the

fractional currency now in circulation.

How to increase the surplus revenue is for Congress to devise, but

I will venture to suggest that the duty on tea and coffee might be

restored without permanently enhancing the cost to the consumers, and

that the 10 per cent horizontal reduction of the tariff on articles

specified in the law of June 6, 1872, be repealed. The supply of tea and

coffee already on hand in the United States would in all probability be

advanced in price by adopting this measure. But it is known that the

adoption of free entry to those articles of necessity did not cheapen

them, but merely added to the profits of the countries producing them,

or of the middlemen in those countries, who have the exclusive trade

in them.

Second. The first section of the bill now under consideration provides

that the fractional currency shall be redeemed in silver coin as rapidly

as practicable. There is no provision preventing the fluctuation in the

value of the paper currency. With gold at a premium of anything over 10

per cent above the currency in use, it is probable, almost certain, that

silver would be bought up for exportation as fast as it was put out, or

until change would become so scarce as to make the premium on it equal

to the premium on gold, or sufficiently high to make it no longer

profitable to buy for export, thereby causing a direct loss to the

community at large and great embarrassment to trade.

As the present law commands final resumption on the 1st day of January,

1879, and as the gold receipts by the Treasury are larger than the

gold payments and the currency receipts are smaller than the currency

payments, thereby making monthly sales of gold necessary to meet current

currency expenses, it occurs to me that these difficulties might be

remedied by authorizing the Secretary of the Treasury to redeem

legal-tender notes, whenever presented in sums of not less than $100 and

multiples thereof, at a premium for gold of 10 per cent, less interest

at the rate of 2-1/2 per cent per annum from the 1st day of January,

1875, to the date of putting this law into operation, and diminishing

this premium at the same rate until final resumption, changing the

rate of premium demanded from time to time as the interest amounts to

one-quarter of 1 per cent. I suggest this rate of interest because it

would bring currency at par with gold at the date fixed by law for final

resumption. I suggest 10 per cent as the demand premium at the beginning

because I believe this rate would insure the retention of silver in the

country for change.

The provisions of the third section of the act will prevent combinations

being made to exhaust the Treasury of coin.

With such a law it is presumable that no gold would be called for not

required for legitimate business purposes. When large amounts of coin

should be drawn from the Treasury, correspondingly large amounts of

currency would be withdrawn from circulation, thus causing a sufficient

stringency in currency to stop the outward flow of coin.

The advantages of a currency of a fixed known value would also be

reached. In my opinion, by the enactment of such a law business and

industries would revive and the beginning of prosperity on a firm basis

would be reached.

Other means of increasing revenue than those suggested should probably

be devised, and also other legislation.

In fact, to carry out the first section of the act another mint becomes

a necessity. With the present facilities for coinage, it would take a

period probably beyond that fixed by law for final specie resumption to

coin the silver necessary to transact the business of the country.

There are now smelting furnaces, for extracting the silver and gold from

the ores brought from the mountain territories, in Chicago, St. Louis,

and Omaha--three in the former city--and as much of the change required

will be wanted in the Mississippi Valley States, and as the metals to be

coined come from west of those States, and, as I understand, the charges

for transportation of bullion from either of the cities named to the

mint in Philadelphia or to New York City amount to $4 for each $1,000

worth, with an equal expense for transportation back, it would seem a

fair argument in favor of adopting one or more of those cities as the

place or places for the establishment of new coining facilities.

I have ventured upon this subject with great diffidence, because it is

so unusual to approve a measure--as I most heartily do this, even if

no further legislation is attainable at this time--and to announce the

fact by message. But I do so because I feel that it is a subject of

such vital importance to the whole country that it should receive the

attention of and be discussed by Congress and the people through the

press, and in every way, to the end that the best and most satisfactory

course may be reached of executing what I deem most beneficial

legislation on a most vital question to the interests and prosperity

of the nation.

U.S. GRANT.

EXECUTIVE MANSION, _January 20, 1875_.

_To the House of Representatives_:

I have the honor to transmit herewith a report from a board composed of

one person named by the head of each Executive Department and of the

Department of Agriculture and Smithsonian Institution, for the purpose

of securing a complete and harmonious arrangement of the articles and

materials designed to be exhibited from the Executive Departments of the

Government at the international exhibition to be held in the city of

Philadelphia in the year 1876 for the purpose of celebrating the one

hundredth anniversary of the independence of the United States. The

report gives a statement of what is proposed to be exhibited by each

Department, together with an estimate of the expense which will have

to be incurred. Submitting to Congress the estimate made by the board,

I recommend that Congress make a suitable appropriation to enable the

different Departments to make a complete and creditable showing of the

articles and materials designed to be exhibited by the Government, and

which will undoubtedly form one of the most interesting features of

the exhibition.

U.S. GRANT.

EXECUTIVE MANSION, _January 20, 1875_.

_To the Senate and House of Representatives_:

In my annual message of December 1, 1873, while inviting general

attention to all the recommendations made by the Secretary of War,

your special consideration was invited to "the importance of preparing

for war in time of peace by providing proper armament for our

seacoast defenses. Proper armament is of vastly more importance than

fortifications. The latter can be supplied very speedily for temporary

purposes when needed; the former can not."

These views gain increased strength and pertinence as the years roll

by, and I have now again the honor to call special attention to the

condition of the "armament of our fortifications" and the absolute

necessity for immediate provision by Congress for the procurement of

heavy cannon. The large expenditures required to supply the number of

guns for our forts is the strongest argument that can be adduced for a

liberal annual appropriation for their gradual accumulation. In time of

war such preparations can not be made; cannon can not be purchased in

open market nor manufactured at short notice; they must be the product

of years of experience and labor.

I herewith enclose copies of a report of the Chief of Ordnance and of

a board of ordnance officers on the trial of an 8-inch rifle converted

from a 10-inch smooth-bore, which shows very conclusively an economical

means of utilizing these useless smooth-bores and making them into

8-inch rifles, capable of piercing 7 inches of iron. The 1,294 10-inch

Rodman guns should, in my opinion, be so utilized, and the appropriation

requested by the Chief of Ordnance of $250,000 to commence these

conversions is urgently recommended.

While convinced of the economy and necessity of these conversions, the

determination of the best and most economical method of providing guns

of still larger caliber should no longer be delayed. The experience

of other nations, based on the new conditions of defense brought

prominently forward by the introduction of ironclads into every navy

afloat, demands heavier metal and rifle guns of not less than 12 inches

in caliber. These enormous masses, hurling a shot of 700 pounds, can

alone meet many of the requirements of the national defenses. They must

be provided, and experiments on a large scale can alone give the data

necessary for the determination of the question. A suitable proving

ground, with all the facilities and conveniences referred to by the

Chief of Ordnance, with a liberal annual appropriation, is an undoubted

necessity.

The guns now ready for trial can not be experimented with without funds,

and the estimate of $250,000 for the purpose is deemed reasonable and is

strongly recommended.

The constant appeals for legislation on the "armament of fortifications"

ought no longer to be disregarded if Congress desires in peace to

prepare the important material without which future wars must inevitably

lead to disaster.

This subject is submitted with the hope that the consideration it

deserves may be given it at the present session.

U.S. GRANT.

EXECUTIVE MANSION, _January 25, 1875_.

_To the Senate and House of Representatives_:

I have the honor to transmit herewith the report of the commission of

engineers appointed in compliance with the act of Congress approved June

22, 1874, to investigate and report a permanent plan for the reclamation

of the alluvial basin of the Mississippi River subject to inundation.

U.S. GRANT.

EXECUTIVE MANSION, _January 26, 1875_.

_To the Senate and House of Representatives_:

I have the honor to transmit herewith, for the information of Congress,

a report of the progress made to this date by the United States

Centennial Commission appointed in accordance with the requirements of

the act approved June 1, 1872.

U.S. GRANT.

WASHINGTON, _February 1, 1875_.

_To the Senate of the United States_:

I transmit to the Senate, for consideration with a view to ratification,

a treaty concluded on the 30th ultimo between this Government and His

Hawaiian Majesty, on the subject of commercial reciprocity. I also

transmit, for the information of the Senate, the papers mentioned in the

subjoined list, relating to the commerce between the United States and

the Hawaiian Islands.

U.S. GRANT.

EXECUTIVE MANSION, _February 1, 1875_.

_To the Senate and House of Representatives_:

I have the honor to lay before Congress a communication of the Secretary

of War relative to the action taken in issuing certain supplies to the

suffering people in Kansas and Nebraska, in consequence of the drought

and grasshopper plague, and to respectfully request that such action be

approved.

U.S. GRANT.

EXECUTIVE MANSION, _February 8, 1875_.

_To the Senate of the United States_:

Herewith I have the honor to send, in accordance with the resolution of

the Senate of the 3d instant, all the information in my possession not

heretofore furnished relating to affairs in the State of Arkansas.

I will venture to express the opinion that all the testimony shows that

in the election of 1872 Joseph Brooks was lawfully elected governor of

that State; that he has been unlawfully deprived of the possession of

his office since that time; that in 1874 the constitution of the State

was by violence, intimidation, and revolutionary proceedings overthrown

and a new constitution adopted and a new State government established.

These proceedings, if permitted to stand, practically ignore all

rights of minorities in all the States. Also, what is there to prevent

each of the States recently readmitted to Federal relations on certain

conditions changing their constitutions and violating their pledges if

this action in Arkansas is acquiesced in?

I respectfully submit whether a precedent so dangerous to the stability

of State government, if not of the National Government also, should be

recognized by Congress. I earnestly ask that Congress will take definite

action in this matter to relieve the Executive from acting upon

questions which should be decided by the legislative branch of the

Government.

U.S. GRANT.

EXECUTIVE MANSION, _February 19, 1875_.

_To the Senate and House of Representatives_:

Under the requirements of section 6 of the "act for the government of

the District of Columbia, and for other purposes," approved June 20,

1874, I have the honor to submit herewith the report of the board of

audit upon the amount equitably chargeable to the street-railroad

companies pursuant to the charters of said companies or the acts of

Congress relating thereto, together with the reasons therefor.

U.S. GRANT.

VETO MESSAGES.

EXECUTIVE MANSION, _January 30, 1875_.

_To the House of Representatives_:

I have the honor to return herewith House bill No. 4462, entitled

"An act for the relief of Alexander Burtch," from which I withhold

my approval for the reasons given in the accompanying letter of the

Secretary of War.

U.S. GRANT.

WAR DEPARTMENT, _Washington City, January 28, 1875_.

The PRESIDENT.

SIR: I have the honor to return House bill No. 4462, "for the relief of

Alexander Burtch."

It appears from the records of this office that Alexander Burtch,

Company H, First Indiana Artillery, enlisted July 24, 1861, for three

years, reenlisted as a veteran January 1, 1864, and deserted at Fort

Gaines, Ala., September 25, 1865, and was a deserter at large at date

of muster-out of his company, January 10, 1866.

This Department emphatically objects to this bill becoming a law upon

the ground of its great injustice to every soldier who served honorably

until his services were no longer required by the Government.

Very respectfully, your obedient servant,

WM. W. BELKNAP,

_Secretary of War_.

EXECUTIVE MANSION, _February 12, 1875_.

_To the House of Representatives_:

I have the honor to return herewith House bill No. 2352, entitled

"An act granting a pension to Lewis Hinely," from which I withhold

my approval for the reasons given in the accompanying letter of the

Secretary of the Interior.

U.S. GRANT.

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, _Washington, February 11, 1875_.

The PRESIDENT.

SIR: I have the honor to return herewith House bill No. 2352, "granting

a pension to Lewis Hinely."

I am informed by the Commissioner of Pensions that the act does not

designate the person for whose benefit it was passed. His true name, as

verified by his own signature to papers on file in the Pension Office,

is Louis Heinlig, and as there were several soldiers in the company and

regiment named in the act whose names are similar to that specified

therein, a correction appears to be necessary in order that the

beneficiary of the act may be properly identified should the bill

become a law.

I have the honor to be, very respectfully, your obedient servant,

C. DELANO, _Secretary_.

WASHINGTON, _March 3, 1875_.

_To the House of Representatives_:[92]

House bill No. 3341[93] is herewith returned without my approval, for

the reasons, first, that it appropriates from the Treasury a large sum

of money at a time when the revenue is insufficient for current wants

and this proposed further drain on the Treasury. The issue of bonds,

authorized by the bill to a very large and indefinite amount, would

seriously embarrass the refunding operations now progressing, whereby

the interest of the bonded debt of the United States is being largely

reduced. Second, I do not believe that any considerable portion of the

ex-soldiers who, it is supposed, will be beneficiaries of this

appropriation are applicants for it, but, rather, it would result more

in a measure for the relief of claim agents and middlemen who would

intervene to collect or discount the bounties granted by it. The passage

of this bill at this time is inconsistent with the measures of economy

now demanded by the necessities of the country.

U.S. GRANT.

[Footnote 92: Pocket veto. This message was written in the President's

room at the Capitol, but failed to reach the House of Representatives

before the final adjournment of Congress. The original is filed at the

Executive Mansion.]

[Footnote 93: "An act to equalize the bounties of soldiers who served in

the late war for the Union."]

[The following messages were sent to the special session of the Senate

convened by proclamation (see p. 324) of February 17, 1875.]

SPECIAL MESSAGES.

WASHINGTON, _March 8, 1875_.

_To the Senate of the United States_:

I nominate in the Medical Department, Army of the United States,

Benjamin F. Pope, assistant surgeon, to rank from May 14, 1867.

Note.--October 5, 1870, Assistant Surgeon B.F. Pope, United States Army,

applied for discharge to date December 31, 1870, under section 3, act of

July 15, 1870.

By letter from the Adjutant-General's Office, War Department, November

2, 1870, he was informed he could not be discharged as requested, as the

President had decided staff officers did not come under the provisions

of the act.

Subsequently the President decided that staff officers who applied and

could be spared could go out under the act. Accordingly, Assistant

Surgeon Pope was discharged, on his original application, to date

December 31, 1870, by special order of that date, this because time did

not permit to communicate with him, and the belief that his desire to

leave the service was unchanged.

He drew a year's pay and mileage under the order, came to Washington,

and on May 19, 1871, applied for revocation of the order of discharge on

the ground that, having been officially notified of disapproval, he had

made arrangements to remain in service. Forwarded by the Surgeon-General

recommended. Disapproved by the Secretary of War May 23, 1871.

June 17, 1871, the order of discharge was revoked. Assistant-Surgeon

Pope then refunded the year's pay and mileage and drew pay for

continuous service.

U.S. GRANT.

WASHINGTON, _March 9, 1875_.

_To the Senate of the United States_:

Pursuant to the authority conferred upon me by the joint resolution

of Congress approved on the 17th of June last, due notice was, on the

1st day of July last, given to the Government of Belgium, through

the minister of the United States at Brussels, of the desire of this

Government to terminate the treaty between the United States and His

Majesty the King of the Belgians of the 17th of July, 1858. It being

deemed advisable, however, that another instrument, with provisions more

consonant with the interests of this country, should be entered into

with that Government, I directed that negotiations should be set on

foot for the purpose. They have resulted in the treaty[94] between

the same parties of the 8th instant, which is now transmitted for

the consideration of the Senate with a view to its ratification.

U.S. GRANT.

[Footnote 94: Of commerce and navigation.]

WASHINGTON, _March 15, 1875_.

_To the Senate_:

In answer to the resolution of the Senate of the 12th of March instant,

I herewith transmit a report[95] from the Secretary of State, with

accompanying correspondence.

U.S. GRANT.

[Footnote 95: Stating that the question of indemnity demanded from Spain

for the execution or detention of a portion of the crew of the steamer

_Virginius_ and for the execution of passengers, citizens of the United

States, had been disposed of by an agreement between the two countries,

and transmitting correspondence connected therewith.]

EXECUTIVE MANSION, _March 17, 1875_.

_To the Senate of the United States_:

I have the honor to transmit herewith communications from the

Secretaries of War and the Interior, in answer to the resolution of the

Senate of the 15th instant, requesting "any information in my possession

in regard to the proposed emigration to the Black Hills country, in the

Sioux Indian Reservation; whether such emigration is with the consent of

the Indian tribes holding said country under the treaty of February 24,

1869, and, if not, what measures will be taken in relation to the same."

U.S. GRANT.

PROCLAMATIONS.

BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

A PROCLAMATION.

Whereas it is provided in the Constitution of the United States that the

United States shall protect every State in the Union, on application of

the legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature can not be

convened), against domestic violence; and

Whereas it is provided by the laws of the United States that in all

cases of insurrection in any State or of obstruction to the laws

thereof it shall be lawful for the President of the United States, on

application of the legislature of such State, or of the executive (when

the legislature can not be convened), to call forth the militia of any

other State or States, or to employ such part of the land and naval

force as shall be judged necessary, for the purpose of suppressing

such insurrection or of causing the laws to be duly executed; and

Whereas the legislature of the State of Mississippi, now in session,

have represented to me, in a concurrent resolution of that body, that

several of the legally elected officers of Warren County, in said State,

are prevented from executing the duties of their respective offices by

force and violence; that the public buildings and records of said county

have been taken into the possession of and are now held by lawless and

unauthorized persons; that many peaceable citizens of said county have

been killed, and others have been compelled to abandon and remain away

from their homes and families; that illegal and riotous seizures and

imprisonments have been made by such lawless persons; and, further,

that a large number of armed men from adjacent States have invaded

Mississippi to aid such lawless persons, and are still ready to give

them such aid; and

Whereas it is further represented as aforesaid by said legislature that

the courts of said county can not be held, and that the governor of said

State has no sufficient force at his command to execute the laws thereof

in said county and suppress said violence without causing a conflict of

races and endangering life and property to an alarming extent; and

Whereas the said legislature as aforesaid have made application to me

for such part of the military force of the United States as may be

necessary and adequate to protect said State and the citizens thereof

against the domestic violence hereinbefore mentioned and to enforce the

due execution of the laws; and

Whereas the laws of the United States require that whenever it may be

necessary, in the judgment of the President, to use the military force

for the purposes aforesaid, he shall forthwith, by proclamation, command

such insurgents to disperse and retire peaceably to their respective

abodes within a limited time:

Now, therefore, I, Ulysses S. Grant, President of the United States, do

hereby command said disorderly and turbulent persons to disperse and

retire peaceably to their respective abodes within five days from the

date hereof, and that they refrain from forcible resistance to the laws

and submit themselves peaceably to the lawful authorities of said county

and State.

In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of

the United States to be affixed.

[SEAL.]

Done at the city of Washington, this 21st day of December, A.D. 1874,

and of the Independence of the United States the ninety-ninth.

U.S. GRANT.

By the President:

HAMILTON FISH,

_Secretary of State_.

BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

A PROCLAMATION.

Whereas objects of interest to the United States require that the Senate

should be convened at 12 o'clock on the 5th day of March next to receive

and act upon such communications as may be made to it on the part of the

Executive:

Now, therefore, I, Ulysses S. Grant, President of the United States,

have considered it to be my duty to issue this my proclamation,

declaring that an extraordinary occasion requires the Senate of the

United States to convene for the transaction of business at the Capitol,

in the city of Washington, on the 5th day of March next, at 12 o'clock

at noon on that day, of which all who shall at that time be entitled to

act as members of that body are hereby required to take notice.

[SEAL.]

Given under my hand and the seal of the United States, at Washington,

the 17th day of February, A.D. 1875, and of the Independence of the

United States of America the ninety-ninth.

U.S. GRANT.

By the President:

HAMILTON FISH,

_Secretary of State_.

BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

A PROCLAMATION.

Whereas by the eighth section of the act of Congress entitled "An act

for the creation of a court for the adjudication and disposition of

certain moneys received into the Treasury under an award made by the

tribunal of arbitration constituted by virtue of the first article of

the treaty concluded at Washington the 8th of May, A.D. 1871, between

the United States of America and the Queen of Great Britain," approved

June 23, 1874, it is provided--

That the judges of the court created by this act shall convene in

the city of Washington as soon as conveniently may be after their

appointment; and the said court shall exist for one year from the

date of its first convening and organizing; and should it be found

impracticable to complete the work of the said court before the

expiration of the said one year, the President may by proclamation

extend the time of the duration thereof to a period not more than six

months beyond the expiration of the said one year; and in such case

all the provisions of this act shall be taken and held to be the same

as though the continuance of the said court had been originally fixed

by this act at the limit to which it may be thus extended.

And whereas it has been made satisfactorily to appear to me that the

said court convened on the 22d of July, 1874, and that a large portion

of the business of said court still remains undisposed of, and that it

is found impracticable to complete the work of the said court before the

expiration of the said one year from its first convening and organizing:

Now, therefore, be it known that I, Ulysses S. Grant, President of the

United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the

provisions of the said eighth section of the act of Congress aforesaid,

do hereby extend the time of the duration of said "Court of

Commissioners of Alabama Claims" for a period of six months from and

after the 22d day of July, A.D. 1875.

In testimony whereof I have hereunto signed my name and have caused the

seal of the United States to be affixed.

[SEAL.]

Done at the city of Washington, this 2d day of June, A.D. 1875, and of

the Independence of the United States the ninety-ninth.

U.S. GRANT.

By the President:

HAMILTON FISH,

_Secretary of State_.

BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

A PROCLAMATION.

In accordance with a practice at once wise and beautiful, we have been

accustomed, as the year is drawing to a close, to devote an occasion to

the humble expression of our thanks to Almighty God for the ceaseless

and distinguished benefits bestowed upon us as a nation and for His

mercies and protection during the closing year.

Amid the rich and free enjoyment of all our advantages, we should not

forget the source from whence they are derived and the extent of our

obligation to the Father of All Mercies.

We have full reason to renew our thanks to Almighty God for favors

bestowed upon us during the past year.

By His continuing mercy civil and religious liberty have been

maintained, peace has reigned within our borders, labor and enterprise

have produced their merited rewards; and to His watchful providence we

are indebted for security from pestilence and other national calamity.

Apart from national blessings, each individual among us has occasion to

thoughtfully recall and devoutly recognize the favors and protection

which he has enjoyed.

Now, therefore, I, Ulysses S. Grant, President of the United States,

do recommend that on Thursday, the 25th day of November, the people of

the United States, abstaining from all secular pursuits and from their

accustomed avocations, do assemble in their respective places of

worship, and, in such form as may seem most appropriate in their own

hearts, offer to Almighty God their acknowledgments and thanks for all

His mercies and their humble prayers for a continuance of His divine

favor.

In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of

the United States to be affixed.

[SEAL.]

Done at the city of Washington, this 27th day of October, A.D. 1875, and

of the Independence of the United States the one hundredth.

U.S. GRANT.

By the President:

HAMILTON FISH,

_Secretary of State_.

EXECUTIVE ORDERS.

EXECUTIVE MANSION, _March 9, 1875_.

In order to carry out the provisions of the fifth section of the act

of Congress entitled "An act making appropriations for sundry civil

expenses of the Government for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1876,

and for other purposes," approved March 3, 1875, the board heretofore

appointed to take charge of the articles and materials to be exhibited

by the several Executive Departments, the Smithsonian Institution, and

the Agricultural Department at the International Exhibition of 1876 is

hereby continued under the following regulations and distribution of

duties, viz:

The funds appropriated by the above-named section will be drawn from

the Treasury upon the requisition of the chairman of the board, and be

disbursed as are other public moneys under the existing laws relating

to disbursing officers.

An officer of the Army will be detailed by the Secretary of War as

disbursing officer of the board.

Each representative of an Executive Department and the representatives

of the Smithsonian Institution, of the Agricultural Department, and

the United States Commissioner of Food Fishes will have charge of the

matters pertaining to his respective Department, subject to the general

advisement of the board; and all bills will be paid by the disbursing

officer upon vouchers certified by such representative and countersigned

by the chairman of the board.

The disbursing officer will render monthly accounts current of all

advances to and disbursements by him to the First Auditor of the

Treasury for audit and settlement in the same manner as are other

accounts of disbursing officers of the Government.

Each representative will be held responsible to the head of his

respective Department for all public property of the United States

furnished by the head of such Department or otherwise coming to his

hands for the purposes of the exhibition, and will render proper

accounts of the same to such head of Department until the property

is returned.

U.S. GRANT,

_President United States_.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT, _March 9, 1875_.

The BOARD OF EXAMINERS,

_Treasury Department_:

By direction of the President, the rules and regulations known as the

civil-service rules, etc., governing appointments and promotions under

the Treasury Department are hereby abolished, and hereafter all

appointments will be made as provided for by section 164, Revised

Statutes, enacted June 22, 1874.

You are instructed and directed to transfer all books, papers, records,

and public property in your possession to the chief clerk of the

Department, and notify all sub-boards of the promulgation of this order.

The clerks and other employees now on duty under the direction of the

board of examiners will report to the chief clerk for assignment to

duty. I am, very respectfully,

B.H. BRISTOW, _Secretary_.

[A similar order was, by direction of the President, issued by the heads

of the other Executive Departments.]

EXECUTIVE MANSION, _March 25, 1875_.

In pursuance of the fourth section of the act entitled "An act

making appropriations for sundry civil expenses of the Government

for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1876, and for other purposes,"

approved March 3, 1875, a board is hereby appointed, to consist of

Lieutenant-Colonel T.T.S. Laidley, Ordnance Department, United States

Army, president of the board; Commander L.A. Beardslee, United States

Navy; Lieutenant-Colonel Q.A. Gillmore, Engineer Department, United

States Army; David Smith, Chief Engineer, United States Navy; W. Sooy

Smith, civil engineer; A.S. Holly, civil engineer; R.H. Thurston,

civil engineer, who will convene at the Watertown Arsenal, Mass.,

on April 15, 1875, or as soon thereafter as practicable, for the purpose

of determining by actual tests the strength and value of all kinds of

iron, steel, and other metals which may be submitted to them or by them

procured, and to prepare tables which will exhibit the strength and

value of said materials for constructive and mechanical purposes, and

to provide for the building of a suitable machine for establishing such

tests, the machine to be set up and maintained at the Watertown Arsenal.

The funds appropriated for the purposes of these tests will be disbursed

under the Ordnance Department of the Army, and the board will receive

instructions from and make its report to the Chief of Ordnance.

Mr. R.H. Thurston, civil engineer, is designated as secretary of the

board, at an annual compensation of $1,200.

Actual traveling expenses, as provided by law, will be allowed the

members of the board.

U.S. GRANT.

EXECUTIVE MANSION, _Washington, May 24, 1875_.

SIR:[96] The President directs me to say that the several Departments of

the Government will be closed on Saturday, the 29th instant, in order to

enable the employees to participate in the decoration of the graves of

the soldiers who fell during the rebellion.

I am, sir, your obedient servant,

O.E. BABCOCK, _Secretary_.

[Footnote 96: Addressed to the heads of the Executive Departments, etc,]

TREASURY DEPARTMENT, _Washington, D.C., July 3, 1875_.

_To Collectors of Customs_:

The importation of breech-loading rifles, and fixed ammunition suitable

therefor, into the Territory of Alaska, and the shipment of such rifles

or ammunition to any port or place in the Territory of Alaska, are

hereby forbidden, and collectors of customs are instructed to refuse

clearance of any vessel having on board any such arms or ammunition

destined for any port or place in said Territory.

If, however, any vessel intends to touch or trade at a port in Alaska

Territory or to pass within the waters thereof, but shall be ultimately

destined for some port or place not within the limits of said Territory,

and shall have on board any such firearms or ammunition, the master or

chief officer thereof will be required to execute and deliver to the

collector of customs at the port of clearance a good and sufficient

bond, with two sureties, in double the value of such merchandise,

conditioned that such arms or ammunition, or any part thereof, shall not

be landed or disposed of within the Territory of Alaska. Such bond shall

be taken for such time as the collector shall deem proper, and may be

satisfied upon proofs similar to those required to satisfy ordinary

export bonds, showing that such arms have been landed at some foreign

port; or, if such merchandise is landed at any port of the United States

not within the limits of the Territory of Alaska, the bond may be

satisfied upon production of a certificate to that effect from the

collector of the port where it is so landed.

CHAS. F. CONANT, _Acting Secretary_.

Approved:

U.S. GRANT, _President_.

EXECUTIVE MANSION, _July 27, 1875_.

In conformity to provisions contained in the river and harbor act

approved March 3, 1875, granting to James B. Eads and his associates

authority to use, for the construction of jetties at the mouth of the

Mississippi River, any materials on the public lands of the United

States that shall be suitable for and may be needed in said works, under

such regulations as the Secretary of War shall prescribe, it is hereby

ordered and directed--

1. That the general supervision of all matters properly appertaining to

the grant therein made is placed in the officer of engineers, Major C.B.

Comstock, detailed by the Secretary of War, under the provisions of the

said act, to report to him "the depth of water and width of channel

secured and maintained from time to time in said channel, together with

such other information as the Secretary of War may direct."

2. _Protection of the interests of the United States so far as the

taking of material is concerned_.--Said Eads and his associates shall,

prior to taking material from any public lands, obtain authority to do

so from the Secretary of War, their applications specifying the kinds

and amounts of material they wish to take from each subdivision of the

public lands; and they shall at once cease from such taking on being

notified that the authority is withdrawn.

3. _Protection of the interests of the United States so far as

structures are concerned._--Said Eads and his associates and contractors

are authorized to erect, at their own expense, such shops, dwellings,

storehouses, and wharves on the military reservation at the mouth of the

Mississippi as may be necessary for the prosecution of the work, and

shall furnish a list and plan showing the location of the same to the

Secretary of War; but these shall be erected in such a way and at such

places as not unnecessarily to interfere with navigation or any other

interest in which the United States is concerned, whereof the Secretary

of War shall be the judge. At his direction any such structure shall be

at once removed.

4. _Protection of James B. Eads's interests_.--No person save said Eads

and his contractors shall erect any building, tent, or other habitation

on the military reservation at the mouth of the Mississippi River. Any

person so doing may be summarily ejected by the United States marshal or

his deputy. But as authority has already been given to James B. Eads by

the Secretary of War to collect the material aforesaid until he should

be furnished with the regulations as now herein given, the said Eads is

authorized to continue collecting materials under that authority until

the 1st day of September, 1875, after which time these regulations will

go into effect.

U.S. GRANT.

GENERAL ORDERS, No. 73.

WAR DEPARTMENT,

ADJUTANT-GENERAL'S OFFICE,

_Washington, August 2, 1875_.

I. The following order has been received from the President of the

United States:

EXECUTIVE MANSION, _Washington, July 31, 1875_.

It becomes the painful duty of the President to announce to the people

of the United States the death of Andrew Johnson, the last survivor of

his honored predecessors, which occurred in Carter County, East

Tennessee, at an early hour this morning.

The solemnity of the occasion which called him to the Presidency, with

the varied nature and length of his public services, will cause him to

be long remembered and occasion mourning for the death of a

distinguished public servant.

As a mark of respect for the memory of the deceased, it is ordered that

the Executive Mansion and several Departments of the Government at

Washington be draped in mourning until the close of the day designated

for his funeral, and that all public business be suspended on that day.

It is further ordered that the War and Navy Departments cause suitable

honors to be paid on the occasion to the memory of the illustrious dead.

U.S. GRANT.

By the President:

JOHN L. CADWALADER,

_Acting Secretary of State_.

II. In compliance with the President's instructions, the troops will be

paraded at 10 o'clock a.m. on the day after the receipt of this order at

each military post, when the order will be read to them, and the labors

of that day will thereafter cease.

The national flag will be displayed at half-staff.

At dawn of day thirteen guns will be fired, and afterwards at intervals

of thirty minutes, between the rising and setting sun a single gun, and

at the close of the day a national salute of thirty-seven guns.

The officers of the Army will wear crape on the left arm and on their

swords and the colors of the several regiments will be put in mourning

for the period of thirty days.

By order of the Secretary of War:

E.D. TOWNSEND, _Adjutant-General_.

SPECIAL ORDER.

NAVY DEPARTMENT, _Washington, August 2, 1875_.

The President of the United States announces the death of ex-President

Andrew Johnson in the following order:

[For order see preceding page.]

In pursuance of the foregoing order, it is hereby directed that the

ensign at each naval station and of each vessel of the United States

Navy in commission be hoisted at half-mast from sunrise to sunset, and

that a gun be fired at intervals of every half hour from sunrise to

sunset at each naval station and on board of flagships and of vessels

acting singly, on Tuesday, the 3d instant, the day of the funeral, where

this order may be received in time, otherwise on the day after its

receipt.

The officers of the Navy and Marine Corps will wear the usual badge of

mourning attached to the sword hilt and on the left arm for the period

of thirty days.

DANIEL AMMEN, _Acting Secretary of the Navy_.

GENERAL ORDERS, No. 97.

WAR DEPARTMENT,

ADJUTANT-GENERAL'S OFFICE,

_Washington, November 22, 1875_.

I. The following order announces the decease of Henry Wilson,

Vice-President of the United States:

EXECUTIVE MANSION, _Washington, November 22, 1875_.

It is with profound sorrow that the President has to announce to the

people of the United States the death of the Vice-President, Henry

Wilson, who died in the Capitol of the nation this morning.

The eminent station of the deceased, his high character, his long career

in the service of his State and of the Union, his devotion to the cause

of freedom, and the ability which he brought to the discharge of every

duty stand conspicuous and are indelibly impressed on the hearts and

affections of the American people.

In testimony of respect for this distinguished citizen and faithful

public servant the various Departments of the Government will be closed

on the day of the funeral, and the Executive Mansion and all the

Executive Departments in Washington will be draped with badges of

mourning for thirty days.

The Secretaries of War and of the Navy will issue orders that

appropriate military and naval honors be rendered to the memory of one

whose virtues and services will long be borne in recollection by a

grateful nation.

U.S. GRANT.

By the President:

HAMILTON FISH,

_Secretary of State_.

II. On the day next succeeding the receipt of this order at each

military post the troops will be paraded at 10 o'clock a. m. and this

order read to them.

The national flag will be displayed at half-staff.

At dawn of day thirteen guns will be fired. Commencing at 12 o'clock

noon seventeen minute guns will be fired, and at the close of the day

the national salute of thirty-seven guns.

The usual badge of mourning will be worn by officers of the Army and the

colors of the several regiments will be put in mourning for the period

of three months.

By order of the Secretary of War:

E.D. TOWNSEND, _Adjutant-General_.

SPECIAL ORDER.

NAVY DEPARTMENT, _Washington, November 23, 1875_.

The President of the United States announces the death of Vice-President

Henry Wilson in the following order:

[For order see preceding page.]

In pursuance of the foregoing order, it is hereby directed that upon the

day following the receipt of this the ensign at each United States naval

station and of each United States naval vessel in commission be hoisted

at half-mast from sunrise to sunset, and that thirteen guns be fired at

sunrise, nineteen minute guns at meridian, and a national salute at

sunset at each United States naval station and on board flagships and

vessels acting singly, at home or abroad.

The officers of the Navy and Marine Corps will wear the usual badge of

mourning for three months.

GEO. M. ROBESON, _Secretary of the Navy_.

SEVENTH ANNUAL MESSAGE.

EXECUTIVE MANSION, _December 7, 1875_.

_To the Senate and House of Representatives_:

In submitting my seventh annual message to Congress, in this centennial

year of our national existence as a free and independent people, it

affords me great pleasure to recur to the advancement that has been made

from the time of the colonies, one hundred years ago. We were then a

people numbering only 3,000,000. Now we number more than 40,000,000.

Then industries were confined almost exclusively to the tillage of the

soil. Now manufactories absorb much of the labor of the country.

Our liberties remain unimpaired; the bondmen have been freed from

slavery; we have become possessed of the respect, if not the friendship,

of all civilized nations. Our progress has been great in all the

arts--in science, agriculture, commerce, navigation, mining, mechanics,

law, medicine, etc,: and in general education the progress is likewise

encouraging. Our thirteen States have become thirty-eight, including

Colorado (which has taken the initiatory steps to become a State), and

eight Territories, including the Indian Territory and Alaska, and

excluding Colorado, making a territory extending from the Atlantic to

the Pacific. On the south we have extended to the Gulf of Mexico, and

in the west from the Mississippi to the Pacific.

One hundred years ago the cotton gin, the steamship, the railroad, the

telegraph, the reaping, sewing, and modern printing machines, and

numerous other inventions of scarcely less value to our business and

happiness were entirely unknown.

In 1776 manufactories scarcely existed even in name in all this vast

territory. In 1870 more than 2,000,000 persons were employed in

manufactories, producing more than $2,100,000,000 of products in amount

annually, nearly equal to our national debt. From nearly the whole of

the population of 1776 being engaged in the one occupation of

agriculture, in 1870 so numerous and diversified had become the

occupation of our people that less than 6,000,000 out of more than

40,000,000 were so engaged. The extraordinary effect produced in our

country by a resort to diversified occupations has built a market for

the products of fertile lands distant from the seaboard and the markets

of the world.

The American system of locating various and extensive manufactories

next to the plow and the pasture, and adding connecting railroads

and steamboats, has produced in our distant interior country a result

noticeable by the intelligent portions of all commercial nations. The

ingenuity and skill of American mechanics have been demonstrated at

home and abroad in a manner most flattering to their pride. But for the

extraordinary genius and ability of our mechanics, the achievements of

our agriculturists, manufacturers, and transporters throughout the

country would have been impossible of attainment.

The progress of the miner has also been great. Of coal our production

was small; now many millions of tons are mined annually. So with iron,

which formed scarcely an appreciable part of our products half a century

ago, we now produce more than the world consumed at the beginning of

our national existence. Lead, zinc, and copper, from being articles

of import, we may expect to be large exporters of in the near future.

The development of gold and silver mines in the United States and

Territories has not only been remarkable, but has had a large influence

upon the business of all commercial nations. Our merchants in the last

hundred years have had a success and have established a reputation for

enterprise, sagacity, progress, and integrity unsurpassed by peoples of

older nationalities. This "good name" is not confined to their homes,

but goes out upon every sea and into every port where commerce enters.

With equal pride we can point to our progress in all of the learned

professions.

As we are now about to enter upon our second centennial--commencing our

manhood as a nation--it is well to look back upon the past and study

what will be best to preserve and advance our future greatness. From the

fall of Adam for his transgression to the present day no nation has ever

been free from threatened danger to its prosperity and happiness. We

should look to the dangers threatening us, and remedy them so far as

lies in our power. We are a republic whereof one man is as good as

another before the law. Under such a form of government it is of the

greatest importance that all should be possessed of education and

intelligence enough to cast a vote with a right understanding of

its meaning. A large association of ignorant men can not for any

considerable period oppose a successful resistance to tyranny and

oppression from the educated few, but will inevitably sink into

acquiescence to the will of intelligence, whether directed by the

demagogue or by priestcraft. Hence the education of the masses becomes

of the first necessity for the preservation of our institutions. They

are worth preserving, because they have secured the greatest good to

the greatest proportion of the population of any form of government yet

devised. All other forms of government approach it just in proportion

to the general diffusion of education and independence of thought and

action. As the primary step, therefore, to our advancement in all that

has marked our progress in the past century, I suggest for your earnest

consideration, and most earnestly recommend it, that a constitutional

amendment be submitted to the legislatures of the several States for

ratification, making it the duty of each of the several States to

establish and forever maintain free public schools adequate to the

education of all the children in the rudimentary branches within their

respective limits, irrespective of sex, color, birthplace, or religions;

forbidding the teaching in said schools of religious, atheistic, or

pagan tenets; and prohibiting the granting of any school funds or school

taxes, or any part thereof, either by legislative, municipal, or other

authority, for the benefit or in aid, directly or indirectly, of any

religious sect or denomination, or in aid or for the benefit of any

other object of any nature or kind whatever.

In connection with this important question I would also call your

attention to the importance of correcting an evil that, if permitted to

continue, will probably lead to great trouble in our land before the

close of the nineteenth century. It is the accumulation of vast amounts

of untaxed church property.

In 1850, I believe, the church property of the United States which paid

no tax, municipal or State, amounted to about $83,000,000. In 1860 the

amount had doubled; in 1875 it is about $1,000,000,000. By 1900, without

check, it is safe to say this property will reach a sum exceeding

$3,000,000,000. So vast a sum, receiving all the protection and benefits

of Government without bearing its proportion of the burdens and expenses

of the same, will not be looked upon acquiescently by those who have

to pay the taxes. In a growing country, where real estate enhances so

rapidly with time, as in the United States, there is scarcely a limit to

the wealth that may be acquired by corporations, religious or otherwise,

if allowed to retain real estate without taxation. The contemplation of

so vast a property as here alluded to, without taxation, may lead to

sequestration without constitutional authority and through blood.

I would suggest the taxation of all property equally, whether church

or corporation, exempting only the last resting place of the dead and

possibly, with proper restrictions, church edifices.

Our relations with most of the foreign powers continue on a satisfactory

and friendly footing.

Increased intercourse, the extension of commerce, and the cultivation

of mutual interests have steadily improved our relations with the large

majority of the powers of the world, rendering practicable the peaceful

solution of questions which from time to time necessarily arise, leaving

few which demand extended or particular notice.

The correspondence of the Department of State with our diplomatic

representatives abroad is transmitted herewith.

I am happy to announce the passage of an act by the General Cortes

of Portugal, proclaimed since the adjournment of Congress, for the

abolition of servitude in the Portuguese colonies. It is to be hoped

that such legislation may be another step toward the great consummation

to be reached, when no man shall be permitted, directly or indirectly,

under any guise, excuse, or form of law, to hold his fellow-man in

bondage. I am of opinion also that it is the duty of the United States,

as contributing toward that end, and required by the spirit of the age

in which we live, to provide by suitable legislation that no citizen of

the United States shall hold slaves as property in any other country or

be interested therein.

Chile has made reparation in the case of the whale ship _Good Return_,

seized without sufficient cause upward of forty years ago. Though she

had hitherto denied her accountability, the denial was never acquiesced

in by this Government, and the justice of the claim has been so

earnestly contended for that it has been gratifying that she should have

at last acknowledged it.

The arbitrator in the case of the United States steamer _Montijo_, for

the seizure and detention of which the Government of the United States

of Colombia was held accountable, has decided in favor of the claim.

This decision has settled a question which had been pending for several

years, and which, while it continued open, might more or less disturb

the good understanding which it is desirable should be maintained

between the two Republics.

A reciprocity treaty with the King of the Hawaiian Islands was concluded

some months since. As it contains a stipulation that it shall not take

effect until Congress shall enact the proper legislation for that

purpose, copies of the instrument are herewith submitted, in order that,

if such should be the pleasure of Congress, the necessary legislation

upon the subject may be adopted.

In March last an arrangement was made, through Mr. Cushing, our minister

in Madrid, with the Spanish Government for the payment by the latter to

the United States of the sum of $80,000 in coin, for the purpose of the

relief of the families or persons of the ship's company and certain

passengers of the _Virginius_. This sum was to have been paid in three

installments at two months each. It is due to the Spanish Government

that I should state that the payments were fully and spontaneously

anticipated by that Government, and that the whole amount was paid

within but a few days more than two months from the date of the

agreement, a copy of which is herewith transmitted. In pursuance of the

terms of the adjustment, I have directed the distribution of the amount

among the parties entitled thereto, including the ship's company and

such of the passengers as were American citizens. Payments are made

accordingly, on the application by the parties entitled thereto.

The past year has furnished no evidence of an approaching termination

of the ruinous conflict which has been raging for seven years in the

neighboring island of Cuba. The same disregard of the laws of civilized

warfare and of the just demands of humanity which has heretofore called

forth expressions of condemnation from the nations of Christendom has

continued to blacken the sad scene. Desolation, ruin, and pillage are

pervading the rich fields of one of the most fertile and productive

regions of the earth, and the incendiary's torch, firing plantations and

valuable factories and buildings, is the agent marking the alternate

advance or retreat of contending parties.

The protracted continuance of this strife seriously affects the

interests of all commercial nations, but those of the United States

more than others, by reason of close proximity, its larger trade and

intercourse with Cuba, and the frequent and intimate personal and social

relations which have grown up between its citizens and those of the

island. Moreover, the property of our citizens in Cuba is large, and is

rendered insecure and depreciated in value and in capacity of production

by the continuance of the strife and the unnatural mode of its conduct.

The same is true, differing only in degree, with respect to the

interests and people of other nations; and the absence of any reasonable

assurance of a near termination of the conflict must of necessity soon

compel the States thus suffering to consider what the interests of their

own people and their duty toward themselves may demand.

I have hoped that Spain would be enabled to establish peace in her

colony, to afford security to the property and the interests of our

citizens, and allow legitimate scope to trade and commerce and the

natural productions of the island. Because of this hope, and from an

extreme reluctance to interfere in the most remote manner in the affairs

of another and a friendly nation, especially of one whose sympathy and

friendship in the struggling infancy of our own existence must ever be

remembered with gratitude, I have patiently and anxiously waited the

progress of events. Our own civil conflict is too recent for us not to

consider the difficulties which surround a government distracted by a

dynastic rebellion at home at the same time that it has to cope with a

separate insurrection in a distant colony. But whatever causes may have

produced the situation which so grievously affects our interests, it

exists, with all its attendant evils operating directly upon this

country and its people. Thus far all the efforts of Spain have proved

abortive, and time has marked no improvement in the situation. The armed

bands of either side now occupy nearly the same ground as in the past,

with the difference, from time to time, of more lives sacrificed, more

property destroyed, and wider extents of fertile and productive fields

and more and more of valuable property constantly wantonly sacrificed

to the incendiary's torch.

A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents. Volume 7, part 1: Ulysses S. Grant · 第 7 / 10 章