CHAPTER XXI

WHITE EDUCATION

"The most progressive nations have now definitely come to the conclusion

that there is no mode of increasing industrial and commercial efficiency

so effective as universal education sufficiently prolonged to effect

permanent improvement in the observing and reasoning powers of the

children." So said that primate of American education, President Eliot, in

an address at Tuskegee, Ala. Though speaking before an audience chiefly

composed of colored people, he was laying down a general principle, for he

goes on to say that in the Southern states "for both whites and blacks the

school time is too short; a large proportion of the children leave school

at too early an age; well-trained teachers are lacking; and the range and

variety of accessible instruction are too small. Hence a large proportion

of both the white race and the black race in the South are in urgent need

of better facilities for education."

This is one point of view; at the other extremity stand such men as a

Southern editor who has recently written, "As an educational influence the

investment of $100,000 in a cotton mill is worth ten times the $100,000

given a Southern college." What does the South as a whole think on this

question of education? What are its needs? What has it so far done? What

is it prepared to do? How does education affect the race question?

Throughout the South there has been and still persists an excellent

tradition of reading and of education among the classes which may be

presumed to afford such advantages for their children. Classical allusions

and quotations from Scripture and Shakespeare are still recognized by all

well-educated men. Some of the few fine old plantation houses contain

elegantly appointed libraries, stopping short, however, at the year 1836,

or whenever the owner died. The city of Charleston has better bookstores

than the city of Albany. Probably more people in North Carolina can

comment on Shakespeare than in Maine; and the man who can read Horace

without a pony and quote Greek without looking at the book is a public

character. Besides this admiration for an old-fashioned learning that is

now passing, the South feels a genuine and lively interest in what goes on

in the world. The present generation of fairly well-to-do people travel

more, see more, read more that is written in their own time, think more

than did their fathers and grandfathers. They feel a genuine interest in

education, put intelligent thought on methods, show respect for the

colleges, are willing to spend money on schools.

Like England in the Eighteenth Century the South abounded in readers of

good literature, while the land was full of ignorance. Though in early

Virginia suggestions were made for free common schools, and Thomas

Jefferson strenuously advocated them, though in the forties and fifties

several Southern states had elaborate paper systems of schools, outside

the large cities there were no graded schools open to all white children

such as were familiar in the North after 1840. Even New Orleans waited for

good school buildings till the fortunate bequest of McDonogh; as for free

rural schools, not a single Southern state had organized and set in

operation a system before the Civil War. From the first the sparse

settlement of the South, the presence of the Negro, and the lack of that

commercial connection with the rest of the world which so arouses the

human mind, made it difficult and perhaps impossible to found a system of

general popular education in that region.

For the higher education of the dominant class much more was done.

Beginning with William and Mary in 1692--the first colonial college except

Harvard--many colleges were established. The first state university was

North Carolina, founded in 1790; the first American university of the

German type was the University of Virginia, which began operations in

1825; the first institution to introduce coeducation was Blount College,

which, about 1800, conferred the degree of A.B. upon a woman. But for

various reasons there never were money enough, students enough, and

trained educators enough to man the Southern colleges that were founded;

and secondary schools to feed the colleges were lacking. The girls had a

few boarding schools, some of which were called colleges by courtesy, but

their education was superficial. Many students who could afford it found

their way to Northern colleges, and that is why John C. Calhoun, the

apostle of slavery, was a Yale graduate, and Barnwell Rhett, the

protagonist of secession, was a graduate of Harvard.

After the Civil War came a dismal period, when some of the old

universities were closed for want of means and of professors who could

take the oath of allegiance. The training of the children of the best

families at that period has been thus described by one who experienced it:

"The schools that I attended--may God forgive the young women who one

after another taught the children of the sparsely settled

neighborhood--were farces and frauds. There was no public school.... We

lived in sort of a secluded training place for Southern gentlemen.... We

never saw a newspaper.... The professor of mathematics--so a rumor

ran--was a freethinker. He was said to have read Darwin and become an

evolutionist. But the report was not generally believed; for, it was

argued, even if he had read Darwin, a man of his great intellect would

instantly see the fallacy of that doctrine and discard it."

One of the few benefits conferred by the Reconstruction governments was a

system of general public schools nominally open to every child in city or

country; but just as the education of Negroes and Poor Whites was

beginning, the schools were separated for the two races, and the Negroes

were cut off from Southern white teachers. To start the new system there

was no tradition of public school training and management, little sense of

public duty in laying sufficient taxes, and the South was very poor. Hence

it was about 1885 before the South put into operation a general

educational system, supported by public taxation. The most recent

statistics available (for 1906) show over 6,000,000 common school pupils

in the South, besides 380,000 pupils in private schools, 118,000 pupils in

public high schools, and 34,000 more in private secondary schools; 38,000

students in public and private universities, colleges and schools of

technology. Every Southern state has now worked out some system of both

rural and urban public schools, and several of them have a sizable State

school fund which is distributed among the districts. The ordinary type of

rural school is practically the district school of the North over again.

City schools are graded in the usual fashion. Most states have a State

Superintendent of Education, and the more progressive communities like

Louisiana are introducing county superintendents with power to compel good

schools. Surely with so many people and so much money, all must be happy

in the South. It is an educational army, with common school infantry,

secondary school cavalry, and in the institutions of higher learning the

heavy artillery and the big guns. Yet it is an army in which every

division, brigade, and regiment is divided into two camps, in which spear

clashes on shield, for hardly anything in the South so brings out into

relief the race question as the problem of education, and especially of

negro education.

The Reconstruction governments made no provision for public high schools,

but the growth of towns and cities in the South and the need of

preparatory schools for the colleges, and the public sense of the value of

secondary education, have compelled the founding of a great number of such

schools, both for girls and boys. Normal schools have also developed till

there are 45 with over 10,000 students. The colleges are also flourishing;

and of professional schools the South has more than 160, with above 12,000

students.

A rough measure of the need of education is the statistics of illiteracy,

which in the reports of the United States Commissioner of Education is

defined as the status of a person over ten years of age who is able

neither to read nor to write. Such illiterates in Germany are about one

per cent of the population; in England about six per cent; in the whole of

the United States about ten per cent. The various states of the Union show

great variations: in Nebraska in 1900 it was two per cent; and the lowest

Southern state, Missouri, with six per cent, showed a greater proportion

of illiterates than any of 27 Northern states; while the 12 highest

communities on the list, from Arkansas with twenty per cent to Louisiana

with thirty-eight per cent, are all Southern but two. Of 58,000,000

persons sufficiently old to be capable of both reading and writing in some

language in the United States in 1900, 6,000,000 were illiterate, of whom

about 4,000,000 lived in the South; of the 21 most illiterate states and

territories, 15 are Southern, the worst being Alabama, South Carolina, and

Louisiana, in all of which more than a third of the population was

illiterate. This alarming state of things is not due wholly to the negro

race; out of 5,700,000 blacks at least ten years of age, 2,700,000, or

forty-eight per cent, were illiterate; out of 13,000,000 Whites,

1,400,000, or eleven per cent, were illiterates. The white illiterates,

with all the advantages of their superior race, were half as numerous as

the Negroes! Out of 1,900,000 white children of school age, 200,000, or

ten and a half per cent, could not read or write; out of 1,000,000 colored

children of the same age, 300,000 were illiterate, which is twenty-five

per cent.

For both races this proportion of illiterates is steadily diminishing; and

that is the effect of the schools and of nothing else. Never again will

the South see a generation like the present, in which many adults have had

no opportunity, or have neglected the opportunity of going to school when

children. These figures accord with the experience of other states; for

instance, New Hampshire in 1890 was as illiterate as Missouri was in 1900;

and in both states illiteracy is steadily decreasing. As for the Southern

Poor Whites, it is true, as Murphy says, that they have a potentiality of

education. "I find no hopelessness in it, because it is the illiteracy,

not of the degenerate, but simply of the unstarted. Our unlettered white

people are native American in stock, virile in faculty and capacity, free

in spirit, unbroken, uncorrupted, fitted to learn."

The gross figures of illiteracy are misleading, because the old people who

cannot now be taught to read and write reduce the general average against

the children who are learning the arts of intelligence. The percentage of

colored illiterates in the whole of the United States in 1900 was

forty-four per cent as against seventy per cent in 1880; in Louisiana the

percentage runs up to sixty-one per cent; but the Negroes between ten

years old and twenty-five show only about thirty per cent of illiteracy,

and that proportion is steadily decreasing. In 1900 the illiterate

children from ten to fourteen years of age were in Mississippi only

twenty-two per cent. With reasonably good schools and proper laws for

compulsory attendance illiteracy may be expected to sink to about the

figures of other civilized nations.

This raises at once the question of the actual efficiency of the schools

in the South, their comparison with other parts of the country, their

probable effect upon the future of the region. The ability to write one's

name and to read a few words is only the beginning of education; the real

educational question in the South is, What are the schools doing beyond

the rudiments of the three R's? Some light is thrown on that question by

comparing the school statistics of the Lower South with those of a block

of similar Western and Northwestern agricultural communities from Indiana

to Utah: 20,700,000 Southerners have 7,000,000 children of school age

(five years to eighteen), of whom 4,400,000 are enrolled and the average

daily attendance is 2,700,000; 20,700,000 Northerners with 6,000,000

children (a million less than the equivalent South) enroll 4,500,000 and

have a daily attendance of 3,200,000. The Southern group has 92,000

teachers; the Northern, 158,000. The value of Southern school property is

$42,000,000; of Northern, $217,000,000, or over four times as much. The

Southern school revenue is $26,000,000; the Northern, $92,000,000. The

average expenditure per pupil attending in the South is under $10.00; in

the North nearly $30.00. The South spent about 16 cents on each hundred

dollars of valuation; the North spent about 20 cents.

When the whole South together, including such rich states as Maryland and

Missouri, is compared with an equivalent population group in the North,

the figures are more favorable to that section: 28,000,000 Southerners

furnished an average daily attendance of 3,700,000 children; the same

number in the North furnished 4,200,000. The South has 127,000 teachers;

the North, 200,000. The total value of Southern school property is

$84,000,000; of Northern, $294,000,000. A comparison of per-capita

expenditure in the year 1900 showed an average school tax in the United

States of $2.84 per head; but not a single state south of Washington

raised above $2.10. Alabama raised only 50 cents, and even the rich state

of Texas only about $1.50, as against $4.80 in North Dakota. Tennessee

spent $1,800,000 a year in public education; Wisconsin, with an equivalent

population, spent $5,500,000; South Carolina, with a population nine

tenths that of California, spent one eighth as much. The state of

Mississippi spent $6.17 per pupil annually; the state of Vermont spent

$22.85.

Inasmuch as the Negroes contribute several million school children and not

very much in taxes, it will be instructive to compare the 12,000,000

Whites of the Lower South with 12,000,000 Northwestern Whites, in those

forms of education which are referable chiefly to the Whites. The Lower

South, on this basis, furnished in 1906 68,600 pupils in public secondary

schools against 172,600 in the equivalent North; the secondary school

plants in the South cost $23,000,000; in the North $52,000,000. The

college students in the South were 27,800; in the North, 27,200. The

Southern college income was $6,000,000; the Northern, $7,500,000. Here,

again, the comparison of the whole South with 18 million Whites against 18

equivalent millions in the Northwest is somewhat more favorable. The

secondary plant costs $40,000,000 against $77,000,000 in the North. The

normal schools of the South have an income of $1,400,000, those of the

North $2,400,000. The Southern college students are 38,000 against 42,000;

and the college income, $9,000,000 against $12,600,000.

The inevitable inference from these figures is that the South still needs

to bring up its equipment and its expenditure if it is to educate as

efficiently as its neighbors; and this presumption is strengthened by

observation of schools of various grades. The Southern city schools are

good, especially in the former border states; St. Louis, Baltimore, and

Louisville come close up to Cleveland, Indianapolis, and St. Paul in the

outward evidences of educational progress. Statistical comparison of a

group of Southern cities with a group of Northern cities of the same

aggregate population shows that in externals they are not far apart; the

Northern schools have more schoolrooms, more teachers and more plant, but

the annual expenditures are about as large in the Southern as in the

Northern group.

The rural white schools are a different matter. It is, to be sure, nearly

thirty years since old Bill Williams explained why there was no school in

the Clover Bottom district in the Kentucky mountains: "They couldn't have

no school because there wasn't nary door or winder in the schoolhouse.

I've got that door and winder, and I paid a dollar for 'em; but I've been

keeping 'em, you see, because there was trouble about the title. Jim

Harris gin us that land, and we 'lowed 'twas all right, because it

belonged to his gran'ther and he was the favorite grandson; but when the

old man died it 'peared like he had willed it to somebody else; and I

wouldn't put no door nor winder into no schoolhouse where there ain't no

title, and there hain't been no school there sence. You want to know when

all that trouble happened 'bout the title? I reckon it was fifteen or

twenty year ago." There are still just such schools or rather such no

schools in many parts of the South.

Even in prosperous regions, buildings, apparatus, and teacher may be

alike, dirty and repellent. Take, for instance, Mt. Moriah school in Coosa

County, Alabama. The building is twenty-five feet square, inclosing a

single room with two windows and two doorways, one of them blocked up. In

the middle is an iron stove, around which on a winter's day are parked

four benches in a hollow square, upon which, or studying in the corner,

huddle and wriggle twenty-three pupils, ranging from seven up to

twenty-one years of age. They are reading physiology aloud, in the midst

of the gaunt room, with very little in the way of blackboards or

materials. An example of the better district schoolhouse is in a populous

region near the mill town of Talassee; a new building with eleven windows,

well ceiled throughout, with a clean gravel space in front, good desks and

plenty of blackboard.

The curse of many of the rural schools is their easy money, for all the

Southern states have a system of state school funds, the income of which

is subdivided among the districts, and is in some of them about enough to

keep up school three or four months on the usual scale of payment to

teachers. When the school fund is exhausted, great numbers of districts

close their schoolhouses, and the result is that the average number of

school days in a year is far below that of Northern schools. In

Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Rhode Island the public schools are in

session about 190 days; in Georgia, 118; in Arkansas, 87. These are

averages; and since the city schools commonly run seven or eight months,

there must be many districts in which there are not over fifty or sixty

days' school. One of the great educational reforms now going on in the

South is to secure from the local governments appropriations to continue

the schools after the state fund runs out. When the South is sufficiently

aroused to the blessing of education, it will find that it has money

enough for its needs.

Another defect is in the schoolhouses. The Southern towns and cities are

coming to follow the example of the West and North in putting up imposing

school buildings, though there is no such need for elaborate heating

apparatus and ventilation as in the North, and they are in general

simpler. The country schoolhouse is in many cases a big, dirty hut, often

built of logs, wretchedly furnished, and devoid of the commonest

appliances of civilization. There seems to be a feeling throughout the

South that schoolhouses cannot be built wholly out of taxation, but the

people on the ground must contribute at least a part of the cost. You may

find neat and tidy rural schoolhouses, actually painted, but they are far

from typical.

Another difficulty is the teachers. The monthly salaries for white

teachers in several of the Southern states are high. A Coosa County farmer

complains that a teacher in his district is getting $3.50 a day for twenty

days in the month, which was more than any farmer in the district could

earn. But of course her $70.00 a month would only run while school was in

session, which might be five months. In Louisiana rural teachers receive

higher salaries than in any other state in the Union, and no commonwealth

is making such determined effort to improve its rural schools. In the

remoteness of Catahoola Parish may be seen a system of wagonettes to bring

children to central graded schools, a reform which goes very slowly in New

England.

A further reason for the backwardness of the Southern rural schools is

that they are in the hands of county superintendents, whose place until

recently has too often been political. Now there is a body of trained

superintendents who are giving people object lessons in what can be done

even with poor buildings by well-trained teachers. The South is also

bending its energies on normal schools, and the result is a growing body

of teachers with professional spirit, who expect to make the schools their

life work. The state superintendents are also improving in their

professional power. The worst Southern rural schools are not too much

behind those that Horace Mann found in Massachusetts when he began his

work in 1837; the wages of the rural teachers are probably not so low as

those in Maine; and the next decade will see a vast improvement in the

rural schools throughout the South.

So with the secondary schools, where the number of pupils has

astonishingly increased. In 1898 there were in the South 1,107 schools and

72,000 pupils; in 1906 there were 1,685 schools (Texas alone has 321),

5,100 teachers, and 118,000 pupils. A great change has come about in the

education of girls. Nearly half the teachers and nearly two thirds of the

pupils (70,000) in these schools are women, and that means that in

connection with the normal schools, in which there are over 7,000 women

students, the South is now training a body of teachers who are going, to

make a great change in the education of the next generation. The growth of

secondary schools means further that the South is putting an end to a

reproach of many years' standing--namely, that it could not adequately

prepare pupils for college.

It was a severe lesson when the trustees of the Carnegie retiring

allowance fund in 1906 laid down its principle that no grant would be made

to professors in any college which did not come up to the following

standard: "An institution to be ranked as a college must have at least six

professors giving their entire time to college and university work, a

course of four full years in liberal arts and sciences, and should require

for admission not less than the usual four years of academic or high

school preparation, or its equivalent, in addition to the preacademic or

grammar school studies." To the surprise of the Lower South, it was

discovered that only one institution, Tulane University, had insisted on

the condition of four years academic or high school preparation. Several

other organizations are waking the South up to the need of improvements,

such as the Association of Colleges and Preparatory Schools of the

Southern states, with nineteen colleges as members; a commission of the

Southern Methodist Church; the General Education Board of New York, with

its fund of $43,000,000; and the Southern Education Board.

In the South as in the North, there are two types of institutions of

higher learning, the endowed (in most cases denominational) and the

public. The number of Southern colleges is considerable; 166 out of 493 in

the United States--which is not far from the proportion of the population;

but only 8 of these institutions have upward of 500 undergraduate

students, as against 42 in the rest of the Union; and the total number of

undergraduate students in universities, colleges, and technological

schools, 25,300, is about a fifth of the total of 122,000 in the United

States, while the normal proportion would be a third. The property of the

Southern colleges ($99,000,000) is about a fifth of the total college

property; the income of $7,300,000 is about a sixth of the whole, the

benefactions in 1906 ($2,400,000) about a seventh. That is, in number,

wealth, and students, Southern institutions of higher learning represent

about the same reduced proportion to the North as in the case of public

wealth and public expenditures; that means that an average million of

people in the South enjoy less than half the educational advantages

possessed by an average million in the Northwest.

This rather favorable proportion does not obtain in women's education; of

the fifteen colleges for women, recognized by the Bureau of Education as

of full collegiate rank, only 4 are in the South; they include less than

an eighth of the women students, and their property is less than a tenth.

The 95 Southern institutions classified as "Colleges for women, Division

B" are practically boarding schools of secondary grade, and are balanced

by the greater number of Northern girls in high schools; 345,000 against

70,000 Southern high school girls; the 17,000 in private high schools and

academies are overbalanced by 35,000 in the North. One of the great needs

of the South at present is high-class colleges for girls, which shall turn

out a well-grounded and well-trained body of women, interested in public

affairs, and shall be a nursery of high school and college teachers.

The Southern denominational colleges are open practically to men only. The

normal schools receive both sexes, and 4,000 women are registered in the

Southern universities, colleges, and technological schools which are open

to both sexes, as against 10,000 men. As the Southern states grow richer,

they are giving more attention and more money to their public

institutions, but so far few of their advanced institutions take rank

alongside the great Northwestern universities. The University of North

Carolina has 682 students and an excellent tradition; the University of

Texas counts 1,100 men and 400 women, and is in many ways the most

flourishing of the Southern institutions. The University of Virginia,

though it has an annual grant from the legislature, is practically an

endowed institution with 700 students; the University of Georgia has 408

students, though it at one time put forth the whimsical claim that it had

the largest attendance in the United States, surpassing Harvard and

Columbia, a result made up by adding in day scholars in affiliated schools

below the high school grade. The state university funds, including the

federal grants, are usually dispersed among two, or even three or four

small institutions.

There is a vigorous intellectual movement in the South. The recent

graduates, who at one time had a preference for college appointments in

their own colleges, are now giving way to a throng of eager young scholars

who have enjoyed graduate study in American or foreign universities and

hold higher degrees. Wherever you fall in with a body of those men, you

are impressed with their good training and their broad outlook. Politics

are yearly less forceful in such institutions; and probably never again

will there be such an episode as happened in a border state university

about ten years ago. A new president discovered after a time that the

janitor of the college buildings was not disposed to take instructions

from him, whereupon he appealed to the board of trustees to put the man

definitely under his control. The trustees held their meeting, at the end

of which the janitor appeared with a bundle of blue envelopes, the first

of which he offered to the president with the confidential remark, "You're

fired!" The others were addressed to the professors, every one of whom was

summarily removed. Having thus gone back to first principles, the trustees

elected a new president and a new faculty, including some of the old

teachers; strange to say, that university has since become one of the most

promising in its section. In all institutions of this kind and in the

literary faculties of many colleges is a sprinkling of Northern

professors, for the Southern colleges, like the Northern, are more

tolerant than they were half a century ago. Most of the young men now

receiving appointments in colleges and scientific institutions have

studied in other Southern colleges, in the North or in Europe; and in all

the learned associations they take their places as well-equipped and

productive men.

Professional education has also made great strides in the South. Many of

the most promising young men are sent to Northern law and medical schools,

not only because of their supposed educational advantages, but because it

is thought well for a young man to have a double horizon; but the greater

number find instruction in nearby professional schools either established

by practitioners or attached to some university. For the medical students

the hospitals which are springing up everywhere furnish clinical material.

Theological education is less systematized; the older and more settled

denominations have good schools, but too many preachers in the back

country have no other training than a natural "gift of the gab." In the

agricultural and mechanical colleges, and the engineering departments of

the endowed public universities, the South is educating her future

engineers and scientific men.

The educative effects of travel and intercourse with other people are

making themselves felt. In ante-bellum times few Southerners traveled

widely, except the comparatively small number of the richer young men who

found their way to Northern colleges, or abroad. Until ten years ago it

was difficult to hold Southern conventions and gatherings of intellectual

men of kindred aims because people could not afford to travel. Now there

is more circulation, more knowledge of the world, more willingness to see

in what respects the South lags behind, a greater spirit of coöperation

between Southern states, and with some people of other sections. The norms

of common schools, secondary schools, and higher institutions are now laid

down on about the same principles as in the North, and it remains to

develop them, to make paper systems actual, to get more of the school

children registered, more of the registered children in attendance, more

months of school for those who attend, better teachers for the longer

sessions, new buildings to accommodate the larger numbers, more students

to fill the little colleges and to enlarge the universities. White

education in the South is in a progressive and hopeful condition.

In the means of education outside of schools and colleges the South is

still much behind the richer North, and still more behind foreign

countries. Museums and picture galleries are few, aside from private

collections in Baltimore, Washington, Richmond, and New Orleans. The fine

old paintings that one sees in clubs and public buildings come from an

earlier age, for there are few Southern artists. Nevertheless, the

architectural standard is quite as high as in the North, and the tradition

of wide spaces and colonnades persists. In its public buildings the South

is in general superior to the North; even in remote county seats one may

find buildings old and new of classic proportions, dignified and stately.

The South has been poor in collections of books, but all the larger

Universities have fair libraries, and the cities have public libraries,

and the numerous gifts of Carnegie have stimulated this form of public

education. Several Southern cities, as, for example, Galveston, have

endowed institutions for lecture courses on the general plan of the Lowell

courses in Boston.

The South has never been highly productive in literature, and too much of

the Southern writing bears evidence of a purpose of speaking for the South

or in a Southern fashion. A considerable part of the books written by

Southerners are about the South in one way or another; there is a sense of

sectional obligation. This is the less necessary for a region from which

have sprung Poe, one of the world's acknowledged literary delights, and

Lanier. There is a school of Southern writers, of whom the late Joel

Chandler Harris is a type, who have found broader themes of life about

them and have given to the world the delightful flavor of a passing and

romantic epoch. The principal literary work of the South is now in its

newspapers.

Another intellectual force is found in the Southern historical societies,

of which there is one in almost every state. They have shown a lively

interest in saving the records of the early history of the South and in

preserving its memorials from destruction. There are also two or three

literary periodicals of distinct literary merit, in which one finds an

expression of the newest and most modern South.

In every direction, then, the white people of the South are alert. The

schools are fair and improving, the community is awake to the need of

educating all the children, even in the remote country; and though the

taxes for education are still very light, there is a disposition to

increase them. In Texas, for example, where there is a state tax, the

people have by constitutional amendment authorized all school districts to

double that amount by local taxation. If the Whites were the only people

to be educated, and if education were the panacea, if it brought assurance

of good government, the Southern question would in due time take care of

itself.

The most hopeful sign of intellectual progress is the association of those

most interested for the promotion of their common ends; such is the

Coöperative Education Association of Virginia which holds annual meetings

and general conferences for education. These meetings are means of

attracting public attention to the problems and of suggesting the

solution.

For many years education of the Whites in the South has been aided from

the North, first, through considerable gifts for the education of the

Mountain Whites, and second through more sparing aid to colleges for

Whites in the lowlands. Recently, however, the attention of wealthy

Northern givers has been turned to the importance of uplifting the whole

white Southern community, and after several annual visits to the South

under the patronage of Mr. Robert C. Ogden, of New York, a Southern

Education Board was formed, the purpose of which is to rouse people to the

need of improving their education; following it is the General Education

Board, which makes small gifts to educational institutions usually on the

stipulation that they shall raise a conditional amount varying from an

equal sum to a sum three times as great. This is the more necessary as

there are only two or three institutions in the South that have anything

like an adequate endowment. Tulane University in New Orleans has a

property of several millions, and the University of Virginia has recently

raised a new million outright, but the South has no large body of people

with superfluous funds and its giving turns habitually rather in the

direction of church construction and foreign mission work than to

educational institutions. Of $1,400,000 given to the University of

Virginia during thirty years, $900,000 came from Northerners and $270,000

more from foreigners living in the South.

Of late, voices have been raised for some kind of Federal aid to Southern

education on the plea that where there is the greatest intellectual

destitution there is the most need for money. The appeal is contrary to

the usual instincts of the South in matters of federal and state

relations, and is strongly opposed by part of the Southern press,

particularly the _Manufacturers' Record_, which has waged a campaign

against even the private gifts made through the General Education Board.

The Southern South · 第 21 / 28 章