CHAPTER XXVIII

The Fall and Rise of the Southwark Foundry and Machine Company. Popular

Appreciation of the High-speed Engine.

The reader may be amused by some examples which came to my knowledge

of the achievements of the new management. The expensive new vice

president was of course a mere figurehead, as he knew nothing of

the engine or the business or my system of work, so Mr. Merrick’s

superintendent had a free hand.

He adhered to his long pistons, and obtained silent running by an

enormous compression of the exhaust steam, commencing soon after the

middle of the return stroke and rising to initial. This involved a

corresponding premature release of the steam during the expansion.

Between the two, about one-third of the power of the engine was

sacrificed, and they were in continual trouble from the failure of the

engines to give their guaranteed power.

I had always advocated giving our attention as much as possible to

large engines, where all the profit lay. My views had so much weight

that, unknown to me, Mr. Merrick and his superintendent were, before I

left, planning a smaller engine, to be called the “Southwark Engine,”

intended to drive isolated incandescent lighting plants. As soon as

I had been gotten rid of the manufacture of this engine proceeded

actively. It was largely exhibited and advertised, much to the neglect

of anything else. This was pursued persistently until over twenty

thousand dollars had been sunk in it, when it was abandoned.

They had an order from the Pennsylvania Steel Company for an engine to

drive a rolling mill which they were about to establish at Sparrow’s

Point on the Chesapeake Bay below Baltimore, for the manufacture of

steel rails from Cuban ores, which were found to be especially adapted

to the Bessemer process, and where the then new method of rolling was

to be employed, the method by which rails are rolled direct from the

ingot without reheating, which is now in universal use. This engine

was to be much larger than any previously made, and so requiring new

drawings. In making the cylinder drawings the draftsman omitted the

internal ribs, which are necessary to connect and stiffen the walls

of the square steam chest. The consequence of this almost incredible

oversight soon appeared. The engine had been running but a few days

when the steam chest blew up.

The Porter-Allen valve-gear required in its joints eleven hardened

steel bushings, which had to be finished inside and out. These we had

always made from cast steel bars. This process was extremely wasteful

of both material and time. Shortly before I left I had ascertained

experimentally that I could import from England solid drawn steel

tubing of any size and thickness, sufficiently high in carbon to

harden perfectly well. The new management undertook to carry out my

plans. For this purpose a list was prepared of all sizes that would be

required, with the finished dimensions external and internal. From this

another list was prepared, giving the additional material required for

finishing. A large lot of the tubing was ordered. When it arrived they

discovered they had sent the wrong list, the tubes were too thin to be

finished and were useless for any purpose.

They had an opportunity to estimate for a pair of very large blowing

engines. They got out their estimate for one engine, forgot to multiply

the amount by two, and were astonished the morning after they had sent

in their tender to receive the acceptance of it by telegraph.

[Illustration: JAMES C. BROOKS]

Performances of this kind were expensive. When their capital was all

gone, they borrowed five hundred thousand dollars on their bonds,

secured by a blanket mortgage. This did not last a great while. Only

five or six years after I left the affairs of the company reached a

crisis. They had no money to carry on the business, and no business

worth mentioning to carry on, and they owed a floating debt of one

hundred and seventy-five thousand dollars. In this emergency the

directors invited Mr. James C. Brooks to take the presidency of the

company. Mr. Brooks was then a member of the firm of William Sellers

and Company. He was already well acquainted with the high character

of the engine. He found the works well equipped with tools, nothing

wanting but brains. He felt encouraged to make this proposition to the

directors, that if they would raise two hundred and fifty thousand

dollars by an issue of preferred stock, to pay off the floating debt

and give him seventy-five thousand dollars to start with, he would take

hold and see what he could do. This proposition was accepted and Mr.

Brooks took hold; and by a rare combination of engineering skill and

business ability and force of character, having no one to interfere

with him, he soon set the business on its feet, and started it on a

career of magnificent development, which under his management, has

continued for nearly twenty years to the present time.

Of all this, however I was ignorant. I was so situated as not to have

any knowledge of the company. I only observed that their advertisements

had long ago disappeared from the engineering journals. In the fall

of 1905, being in Philadelphia on a social visit, in the course of

conversation I asked my host “Is the Southwark Foundry still running?”

With a look of amazement he exclaimed, “Running! I should say it was

running and is doing a tremendous business.” “Is Mr. Brooks still at

the head of it” I asked. “Yes,” he replied, “you will find him at his

old post, and no doubt he will be glad to see you.”

The next day I called, and was most cordially received by Mr. Brooks.

He said he discontinued advertising a number of years ago, “because

the business was not of a nature to be benefited by advertising, it

rested entirely upon its reputation.” “Our correspondence,” he added,

“is enormous, employing six typewriters.” He took me to the erecting

floor of the shop. I was filled with amazement and delight at the

sight which met my eyes. This floor, which had been greatly enlarged,

was crowded with large engines in process of completion, most of them

larger and some a great deal larger, than the largest I had built. I

confess to a feeling bordering on ecstasy, heightened of course by the

suddenness of the relevation, when I realized the commanding height

to which the Porter-Allen Engine had been raised by this remarkable

man. Mr. Brooks offered to take me through the shops; this however I

declined, not being willing to trespass further on his time. He showed

me the old shop engine which I had not seen for twenty-three years.

Everything looked familiar except its speed. He said to me, “we have

never done anything to this engine, except to increase its speed from

230 revolutions to 300 revolutions per minute, to supply the additional

power required by the growth of the business.” Respecting their system,

he mentioned only one feature, which he evidently regarded as of

special importance, and which he seemed to suppose would be new to me.

It was this: “We make a separate drawing of every piece.”

Under date of Oct. 31, 1907, Mr. Brooks writes me, “the business now

employs ten typewriters, and the engine which was started in 1881, and

which has run at 300 revolutions per minute for the last seven years,

has now been compelled by their increased requirements to give place to

a compound condensing engine of more than twice its power.”

* * * * *

Three or four years ago I was spending a few days at the Mohonk Lake

Mountain House, Mr. Albert K. Smiley’s famous summer resort, and one

day strolled into the power house, where were three dynamos, each

driven by a Ball & Wood engine, the latter making, I think, something

over 200 revolutions per minute.

I fell into conversation with the engineer, rather an old man and

quite communicative. He told me he had been in Mr. Smiley’s employ

for seventeen years, and was voluble in his praises; said he was a

wonderful man, repeating “wonderful” with emphasis, but he added “he

don’t know nothin about machinery, nothin, no more’n you do.” My

attention was attracted by the dynamos, which were new to me and the

framing of which I thought presented a remarkably well studied design.

I mentioned this to the old man, who replied impatiently: “O, that

aint nothin, the engine is the wonder, that’s the wonder; why, when

I was a young man we did not suppose an engine _could_ be run more’n

about fifty or sixty turns a minute, nobody never thought o’ such a

thing; now we can run ’em any speed we like, no poundin, no shakin, no

heatin, it’s just wonderful.” I did not respond or show any interest,

and the old man did not waste any more enthusiasm on me. Did not say a

word when I left directly after, but I fancied him saying to himself:

“Another o’ them stuck ups, that don’t know nothin’.”

Transcriber’s Notes

The text of this document follows that of the source; inconsistent

spelling and hyphenation have been retained, except as mentioned

below.

Depending on the hard- and software used to read this text, and on

their settings, not all elements may display as intended. The scales

as provided in the indicator diagrams are, of course, not necessarily

correct.

Page 93: ... H laid on its side, thus ⌶: the symbol is used to

represent the shape of the rotated letter H, not an I or an I-beam.

Page 137, bill for American belt: there are some errors in the

calculations, these have not been corrected.

Page 147, paragraph starting The day after the opening ...: the

single and double quote marks do not match.

Page 155, ... exposition of the action of the reciprocating parts was

given Mr. Edwin Reynolds ...: should possibly read ... exposition of

the action of the reciprocating parts was given by Mr. Edwin Reynolds

....

Page 202, ... half the distance to the mid-stroke or to _E_, Fig. 32,

...: presumably this refers to the figure on page 201; there is no

figure 32 in the book.

Page 217, If I went, that I would be the end of the business: the

second I should probably be deleted.

Page 293: Presumably the references in the text to Figure 1 and

Figure 2 are to the top and bottom illustration respectively; the

source document does not provide figure numbers.

Page 328-330: The use of quote marks in these letters differs from

that in other correspondence; this has not been standardised.

Changes made

Illustrations and tables were moved out of text paragraphs.

Some obvious minor typographical and punctuation errors have been

corrected silently.

Dimensions m×n and m × n have been standardised to m×n,

multiplications x×y and x × y to x × y; cross-head and crosshead were

standardised to cross-head.

Page xii: illustration numbers have been added; Diagrams from English

Locomotive ... has been changed to Diagrams from English Locomotives

... as in the illustration caption.

Page 40: a closing single quote mark was inserted after ... do not

require any governor,

Page 79: pièce de resistance changed to pièce de résistance.

Page 91, illustration caption: English Locomtlvoes changed to English

Locomotives.

Page 175: ... told me had had supplied all the money ... changed to

... told me he had supplied all the money ....

Page 287: ... this they had been keen kept in ignorance of ...

changed to ... this they had been kept in ignorance of ....

Page 294: b′ and c′ in the text changed to b¹ and c¹ as in the

illustration.

Page 303: ... to very the speed ... changed to ... to vary the speed

....

Page 331: ... before I left planning a smaller engine ... changed to

... before I left, planning a smaller engine ....

Page 333: closing quote mark inserted after ... employing six

typewriters.

Engineering reminiscences contributed to "Power" and "American machinist" · 第 28 / 28 章