ABSURDITY OF "ASPECTS," AND "HOUSES."

4. Nor is it any more reasonable to assert that the aspect of one

planet makes one joyous, or the other sad. What animosity could obtain

betwixt the stars? What could be its reason? Why should their condition

be different when they are in trine aspect, or in opposition, or in

quadrature? What reason have we to suppose that one star regards the

other when it is in some particular aspect to it, or that it no more

regards it when it is in the next zodiacal sign, though thus really

closer to it?

Besides, what is the manner in which the planets exert the influence

attributed to them? How does each exercise its own particular

influence? How do they all, in combination, exert an influence that

differs from this (particular influence)? In fact, they do not hold

deliberations to carry out their decisions on us, each of them yielding

a little of its individual influence. The one does not violently hinder

the action of the other, nor does it condescendingly make concessions

to it. To say that the one is joyous when it is in the "house" of the

other, and that the latter is sad when it is in "house" of the former,

amounts to saying that two men are united by mutual friendship, though

the former love the latter, while the latter hate the former.

Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 4 In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods · 第 178 / 382 题