RHYMES ON THE DECAY OF ROMANCE.

(_Suggested by Mr. Frederic Harrison's recent Article in "The

Forum."_)

Oh, list to Mr. HARRISON lamenting from _The Forum_,

Imagination done to death by latter-day decorum!

"Good boys and girls" we've all become, and modern men and maidens

see

The world with such prosaic eyes, Romance is in decadency!

We're too absorbed in Politics, enamoured of Monotony,

To give an ear to Geniuses (supposing we had _got_ any!)

But First-Class in our Fiction Mr. HARRISON abolishes,

Indeed most Authors travel Third, their talent so toll-lollish is.

It's all the _Fin-de-Siecle's_ fault--and this, of course, a true

bill is;

For Genius puts its shutters up when centuries pass their jubilees!

As Mr. HARRISON can prove by references historical,--

And any utterance of his is equal to an oracle.

We cannot stand a novel now, he says, if there's a shock in it;

Prefer our heroine angular, her eye must have a cock in it,

Unless she's dull and middle-aged, no sympathy have _we_ with her,

Her sole excitement is to ask a plainer friend to tea with her!

He thinks, were _Pickwick_ written now, we'd view it with a cooler

eye,

And term the Trial Scene a piece of "riotous tomfoolery;"

While _Jane Eyre's_ thrilling narrative of _Rochester's_ sad

revelries

Of "shilling shockers" scarcely would to-day above the level rise!

An age that's given up its gas to read by Electricity

Would naturally be repelled by THACKERAY'S causticity,

And scorn the characters of SCOTT, because they had Glengarries on,

An inference which is obvious--to Mr. FREDERIC HARRISON!

How scathingly does he denounce our Literature degenerate,

With not a real Romancer left--or only two at any rate!

By "desperate expedients," each the old tradition carries on--

"But it's no good"--as they're informed by Mr. FREDERIC HARRISON.

For Mr. STEVENSON can write no stories worth hurraying at,

While he upon Pacific Isle persists in _Crusoe_ playing at!

And Mr. KIPLING's ceased to count--no heart in what he does is

there--

He longs for death in far Soudan, a-fighting Fuzzy-Wuzzies there!

So we've only Mr. MEREDITH--(oh, what a sad disgrace it is!)

Though Mr. BLACKMORE writes romance--how poor and commonplace it is!

While Messrs. THOMAS HARDY, BLACK, and BESANT, it would seem, are

all

Unworthy serious notice, mere nonentities ephemeral!

Some people like Miss BRADDON, Mrs. OLIPHANT, Miss BROUGHTON, too.

They're only lady-novelists--so serious readers _oughtn't_ to,

And those who've been convinced by his invidious comparisons,

In future will eschew romance--excepting Mr. HARRISON'S.

* * * * *

THE DARWINIAN THEORY EXEMPLIFIED.--At the Zoo is now being exhibited

"Three White-tailed Gnus,"--"The Latest Gnus." with the best possible

intelligence,--"and a Black-capped Gibbon." This last is evidently a

descendant of the great historian; though, if this exemplifies "the

survival of the fittest," where are the others of the race? Then

"Black-capped" sounds ominous, as if this particular Gibbon stood

self-condemned, and was soon to disappear. Should this be the case,

the Zoo Authorities ought to advertise the fact, and give visitors a

chance before it is too late.

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 104, May 13, 1893 · 第 10 / 28 题