Still another native uses this strong language:--

"Yes, we regard Caste as part and parcel of idolatry, and of all

heathen abominations, because it is in many ways contrary to God's

Word, and directly contrary to God himself."

I hope that I have not occupied too much time with this testimony,

which is strictly in point. There is not a word which is not plainly

applicable to the present case. The witnesses are competent, and in

their evidence, as in a mirror, may be seen the true character of the

discrimination which I bring to judgment before this Court.

It will be vain to say that this distinction, though seeming to be

founded on color, is in reality founded on natural and physical

peculiarities independent of color. Whatever they may be, they

are peculiarities of race; and any discrimination on this account

constitutes the relation of Caste, in the most restricted sense of

this term. Disguise it as you will, it is nothing but this hateful,

irreligious institution. But the words Caste and Equality are

contradictory. They mutually exclude each other. Where Caste is, there

cannot be Equality; where Equality is, there cannot be Caste.

Unquestionably there is a distinction between the Ethiopian and the

Caucasian. Each received from the hand of God certain characteristics

of color and form. The two may not readily intermingle, although we are

told by Homer that Jupiter did not

"disdain to grace

The feasts of Ethiopia's blameless race."

One may be uninteresting or offensive to the other, precisely as

individuals of the same race and color may be uninteresting or

offensive to each other. But this distinction can furnish no ground for

any discrimination before the law.

We abjure nobility of all kinds; but here is a nobility of the skin.

We abjure all hereditary distinctions; but here is an hereditary

distinction, founded, not on the merit of the ancestor, but on his

color. We abjure all privileges of birth; but here is a privilege which

depends solely on the accident whether an ancestor is black or white.

We abjure all inequality before the law; but here is an inequality

which touches not an individual, but a race. We revolt at the relation

of Caste; but here is a Caste which is established under a Constitution

declaring that all men are born equal.

Condemning Caste and inequality before the law, the way is prepared to

consider more particularly the powers of the School Committee. Here it

will be necessary to enter into details.

* * * * *

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 03 (of 20) · 第 39 / 123 题