The special culture of the senses is too much neglected in modern

busy life. Probably at no previous period of human history has

the nervous system generally, and more particularly, have the

sense-organs been so severely taxed as they are now, but never

have they been less carefully cultivated. This is, in part, if not

wholly the cause of the progressive degeneracy of the faculties of

special-sense which is evidenced by the increasing frequency of

the recourse to spectacles, ear-trumpets, and the like apparatus,

designed to aid the sense-organs. The mere use of faculties will

not develop strength--it is more likely to exhaust energy. Special

training is required, and this essential element of education

is wholly neglected in our schools, with the result we daily

witness--namely, early weakness or defect in the organs by which the

consciousness is brought into relation with the outer world. It is

not necessary to adduce proofs, or to argue at length or in detail.

The truth of the proposition laid down is self-evident. On the one

hand we see the neglect of training, and on the other the increasing

defect of sense-power. The matter is well worthy of the attention

of the professional educators of youth. Muscular exercise wisely

regulated and apportioned to the bodily strength is felt to be a part

of education. Sense-culture, by appropriate exercises in seeing,

hearing, touching, smelling, would, if commenced sufficiently early

in life, not merely prevent weakness of sight, deafness, loss of the

sense of feeling, and impairment of the sense of smell, long before

old age; but by its reflected influence on the nutrition of the brain

and upper portion of the spinal cord, would do much to reduce the

growing tendency to paralytic diseases, which are very decidedly on

the increase. (_Lancet._)

_Physical Comfort and Training._--Attention should be directed more

than at present to the physical side of school life in its relations

to the ordinary bodily wants and processes. Many children suffer much

from a fear or dislike of asking for temporary leave of absence from

their classes. They suffer pain, and often cause serious illness,

by this somewhat natural aversion to “asking out.” Foolish teachers

have sharply reproved pupils because they appeared to demand absence

from the class-room too frequently. The teacher evidently imagined

there was some attempt at malingering; whereas the pupil was really

in pain, suffering from an irritable digestive system, which demanded

rest. Such pupils should not be sent to school, it is true; but

if they are allowed to take their place in a class, they should

not be treated as if their demands were dictated by foolishness or

frivolity. The wise teacher is one who, seeing a pupil evidently

suffering, will investigate the cause of the discomfort, and set the

child’s mind and body at rest. Education under physical suffering is,

at its best, the merest farce. You need not be prudish; nor fear any

rebuke from common sense, when you think that children have bodies

which, as well as minds, are placed temporarily under the teacher’s

care. (Wakeham.)

There is a risk at the present day that the claims of intellectual

education, which are being so strongly put forward, may have the

effect of postponing, or causing to be neglected, the care and

cultivation of the bodily powers. In some respects we have rushed

from a state in which too little care was given to mental development

into one where intellectual work predominates. Children must have

several hours’ play daily in the open air; this is much better than

calisthenics or gymnastics for the generality of children; and girls

should be allowed to play as vigorously as boys do.

One exercise which will give permanent strength, which will build up

healthy bodies for girls and ultimately for women, is the swimming

bath, which brings into play all the muscles of the body; another

is the gymnastic class, where, in suitable dresses and under the

direction of competent instructors, exercises fitted for the strength

of girls are set for them to do; and a third is the playground, where

such games as fives, rackets, and lawn tennis give amusement and

ample exercise. The benefits arising from trained muscular activity

are not confined to development of the muscles of the arms and legs,

but all the functions of nutrition of the body are helped to become

effective by means of exercise. Much of the weakness and suffering of

women would be spared if early physical training had been allowed to

them.

_Punishments._--Such brutal punishments as boxing the ears, pulling

the ears, knocking heads together, rapping knuckles with rulers,

&c., belong to a past ignorant age. For corporal punishment nature

has provided a muscular cushion on which the cane may be applied

without fear of serious consequences. “Impositions” mean ruin to the

handwriting, and being closeted in the foul air of the class-rooms

during hours that ought to be spent in getting fresh air. Double

tasks are a still worse form of the same evil. The plan of “keeping

in” boys for breaches of school discipline is objectionable, and it

is infinitely better to require some loss of recreation time in more

healthy ways. In large public schools, where the drill-sergeant is an

institution, there will probably be found no more efficacious mode of

dealing with forgetfulness and petty turbulences than by calling in

the aid of this functionary, who exercises a wholesome influence over

the boys, and inflicts punishments without impairing their physical

condition in any way, while at the same time lending “tone” to their

bodily exercises.

_Foreign Schools._--The only good to be gained by sending children

to foreign schools is acquiring facility in speaking foreign

languages, with more chance of good accent than can be usually

gained at home. Against this there are many things to set off; and

even this advantage itself is often rendered nugatory by one or two

circumstances. In a school where there are many English children

there is very often as much English spoken as French or German--there

are schools in which an idle child might speak English all day long,

and in which the well-paying “Anglais” is not brought too sharply to

task for faults of omission. Again, the acquisition of good accent is

a matter of ear, and no amount of hearing others speak well will make

a child who has no imitative power reproduce an accent with purity.

Scotch or Irish children in English schools do not always lose their

distinctive accent, nor do Lancashire and Yorkshire tongues always

lose their special characteristics. The advantages of foreign schools

are thus shown to be less than they at first seem to be.

But there are also positive disadvantages; and one of the most

evident and most disastrous in its results, as far as the health is

concerned, is that, in matters of food and of arrangements conducive

to health, the ways of foreigners are not our ways. English children,

brought up to the age of 15 or 16 upon English meat and bread, with

plenty of both, cannot accommodate themselves to the diet which

suffices for Frenchmen or Germans; and English children in foreign

schools not unfrequently know what it is to be hungry from sheer

inability to obtain a sufficiently nutritive meal. Many instances

have occurred in which long and troublesome illnesses have been

distinctly traceable to living in schools abroad, and others in which

a life has been cut short through the same agency.

A few words must be said as to the comparative uncertainty regarding

the kind of agencies which may be brought to bear in the moral

training of a girl, and the little power which a parent has of

ascertaining the real nature of these in a foreign, especially a

French school. Nor again, is it to be forgotten that, for those

parents who are desirous that their children should receive religious

training, and should not lose their hold of home habits in that

important matter, there are innumerable anxieties in store in sending

children abroad.

For those who desire to give their children the advantages of foreign

education, there are only two really good courses open. One of these

is to establish the home abroad for a certain time. In that case the

children are under home influence as to training, are under home care

as to food, cleanliness, and personal habits, and do not form a set

of associations distinct from those of other members of the family.

If the family life is considered important, and if it is desired that

the children should early acquire a knowledge of foreign languages,

this is the most advisable plan. In case this is not possible, it

would be advisable to postpone the foreign residence until girls have

reached maturer years--till they have sense to look after themselves,

and until their characters are somewhat formed. There would be then

the additional advantage that home ties would be strong enough to

resist the weakening influence of living apart from the rest of

the family, the foundations of a good English education (too often

entirely neglected in the cases of those reared in foreign schools)

might have been securely laid; and, what is perhaps not the least

recommendation, the children themselves would have their minds more

advanced, and would be more intelligent and ready recipients of the

instruction given to them. (_Queen._)

SUPPLEMENTARY LITERATURE.

John H. Howard: ‘Gymnasts and Gymnastics.’ London, 1873.

C. Löfving: ‘Home Gymnastics, for the preservation and restoration

of health in children and young and old people of both sexes, with a

short method of acquiring the art of Swimming.’ London, 1883. 1_s._

Archibald Maclaren: ‘A System of Physical Education, theoretical and

practical.’ Oxford, 1869. 7_s._ 6_d._

_THE PLAYGROUND._

_Aim of Exercise._--The aim of exercise is not solely to _work_

the organism which is thrown into activity, though that is a very

important part of the object in view, because as the living body

works it feeds, and as it feeds it is replenished; but there is

another purpose, and that is to call into action and stimulate the

_faculty of recuperation_. Those who believe in the existence of

a special system, or series, of trophic nerves, will not object

to this designation of the recuperative function as a separate

“faculty,” and those who believe nutrition to be effected in and by

the ordinary innervation will recognise the sense in which we employ

the terms in italics. It is through defect or deficiency in the

vigour of this faculty that unaccustomed feats of strength, whether

of mind or muscle, are exhausting. The task is performed, but the

underlying faculty of restorative energy, or power of recuperative

nutrition, located in the particular part exceptionally exercised,

is not in a condition to respond to the unusual call made upon it.

When a man goes into training, or, which is practically the same

thing, when he habituates himself to the performance of a special

class of work, he so develops this recuperative power or function

that the repair or replenishing necessary to restore the integrity,

and replace the strength of the tissue “used up” in the exercise,

is instantly performed. The difference between being accustomed to

exercise and able to work “without feeling it,” and being barely able

to accomplish a special task, and having it “taken out” of one by

the exploit, whether mental or physical, is the difference between

possessing the power of rapid repair by nutrition, and not having

that power in working order--so that some time must elapse before

recovery takes place, and during the interval there will be “fatigue”

and more or less exhaustion. The practical value of a recognition of

this commonplace fact in physiology will be found in the guidance it

affords as to the best and most direct way of developing the power or

faculty of recuperation by exercise. Many persons make the mistake of

doing too much. Exercise with a view to recuperation should never so

much exceed the capacity of the recuperative faculty as to prostrate

the nervous energy. The work done ought not to produce any great

sense of fatigue. If “exhaustion” be experienced, the exercise has

been excessive in amount. The best plan to pursue is to begin with

a very moderate amount of work, continued during a brief period,

and to make the length of the interval between the cessation of the

exercise and the recovery of a feeling of “freshness” the guide as

to the increase of exercise. We do not mean that false sense of

revival which is sometimes derived from the recourse to stimulants,

but genuine recovery after a brief period of rest and the use of

plain nutritious food. If this very simple rule were carried into

practice by those who desire “to grow strong,” there would be less

disappointment, and a generally better result, than often attends the

endeavour to profit by exercise unintelligently employed. (_Lancet._)

_Training._--There are few subjects on which it is more difficult to

lay down exact laws than that of training, and yet, notwithstanding

this, there is no lack of books by writers who profess to be

thoroughly acquainted with every detail of the course an athlete must

go through in order to be at his best. Nearly every writer agrees as

to the end to be obtained by training. As to how this end is to be

obtained, however, these doctors sadly disagree. For instance, one

author says, very properly, that the harder a man works physically

the more food he requires. “Amator,” on the other hand, lays down

this law, “the less food, the more work.” In books a regular dietary

is laid down for the man in training, in which some kinds of food are

recommended and others condemned. These vary so much, that were the

unfortunate athlete to avoid everything that he is warned against,

he would be more likely to die of starvation than to win a race.

It is quite impossible to lay down exact rules for everybody. No

two men are of the same physique or temperament, and no one but an

experienced trainer who has his eye continually on his man, can tell

him what to eat and drink, or what exercise to take. A book of the

kind cannot be perfect; but the best we have yet come across is that

published at the _Sportsman_ office. We can recommend it to those who

cannot secure a really good trainer. Such men are rare; but a month

or two under the care of a man who really understands his business

will do more for a beginner than all the books ever published.

Experienced trainers like Bob Rogers, Nat. Perry, or Jack White,

can tell at a glance whether a man wants hard or light exercise, or

whether he ought to put on flesh, or the contrary. These are subjects

that books are powerless upon, and with which no athlete can be

familiar till he has had considerable experience. (_Field._)

_Regulation of Exercise._--Dr. Cathcart gives the following rules

for the regulation of physical exercise. (1) It should be conducted

in an abundance of fresh air, and in costumes allowing free play

to the lungs, and of a material which will absorb the moisture,

and which, therefore, should be afterwards changed--flannel. (2)

There should always be a pleasant variety in the exercise, and an

active mental stimulus, to give interest at the same time. (3) The

exercises should, as far as possible, involve all parts of the body

and both sides equally. (4) When severe in character, the exercises

should be begun gradually and pursued systematically, leaving off

at first as soon as fatigue is felt; and when any real delicacy of

constitution exists, the exercise should be regulated under medical

advice. (5) For young people the times of physical and mental work

should alternate, and for the former the best part of the day should

be selected. (6) Active exertion should be neither immediately before

nor immediately after a full meal.

A fact of paramount importance is to bear in mind that exercise

demands an _abundance of fresh air_, without which it is injurious.

The same man who when naked is capable of inspiring (taking in)

196 cub. in. of air at a breath, can only inspire 130 cub. in.

when dressed. Dr. Parkes points out that during exercise, whether

directly involving the use of the shoulders or not, the lungs should

have the freest possible play; therefore there should be no tightly

contracting garments round the chest which would interfere with

its expansion, and thus tend to neutralise the very benefit it is

destined to bestow; and it follows further from this, that where

exercise has to be taken in such ill-designed garments, the amount

of work done must be in proportion diminished. Hence the miscalled

“constitutional” walk is about the worst form of exercise (next to

dancing), and deserving of actual condemnation, except in the case

of people whose age precludes their enjoying any outdoor game; it

is very apt to become monotonous, can never be really enlivening,

often is reduced to a crawl, is liable to be interrupted by meeting

friends (when chills are easily caught), and always entails wearing

the least suitable garments. Running, on the other hand, when dressed

in athletic costume, is one of the best forms of exercise and an

essential accompaniment of our most popular outdoor games. Among

the means which nature has bestowed on animals in general for the

preservation and enjoyment of life, running is the most important.

Since, then, it is pointed out to us by nature, it must be in a high

degree innocent.

Negroes and Indians in a state of nature run daily in pursuit of

game for food with a facility at which we are astonished, but they

are not more liable to consumption on this account than those beasts

that are so famed for swiftness. The body of no animal seems better

adapted to running than man’s. The nobler parts, which might be

injured by an immoderate reflux of blood, are uppermost, and the

laws of gravitation assist in propelling the runner forward. He has

little to do but to strengthen his limbs by practice and concentrate

his mind on the effort, and there is nothing severe in this, as

experience has shown. Indeed, running may be made very beneficial

to the lungs, and perhaps there is nothing better calculated to

strengthen these organs, in those who are shortwinded, than gradual,

careful training in running. It should only be practised in cool

weather. The clothing should be light, the head bare, and the neck

uncovered. As soon as the exercise is finished, warm clothing should

be put on and gentle exercise continued for some time. It is not

necessary to have a race-course. The teacher of a school may take

his pupils into the fields and find suitable ground for them. Care

must be taken not to overdo, and thus, perhaps for life, weaken or

injure the heart. The race, at first, should be short and frequently

repeated, rather than long, and full speed should not be attempted

for some time. Running is well adapted to young and middle-aged

persons, but not to those who are fat. Sedentary persons may find

great benefit in it after the day’s work. If they live in cities, a

quiet spot may be selected, and short trials adapted to the strength

entered into. Invalids may do the same thing, only they must be more

careful than the robust never to over-exert themselves. Girls may

run as well as boys, from 10 to 12 years of age. After puberty, the

change in the formation of the bones of the pelvis in girls renders

running less easy and graceful. The modern style of dress for girls

after puberty is also entirely unsuited to running.

=Games.=--It would be impossible here to enter into a description of

all our outdoor games, nor is it necessary to do so. The following

remarks embody information which cannot readily be found elsewhere,

and which is therefore more useful than would be a repetition of the

already well-known rules of the chief games.

[Illustration: 157. Badminton Court. 158. Badminton Net.]

_Badminton._--A level bit of turf is the most pleasant ground, though

any level surface will do. The dimensions may be varied according

to the number playing on each side, and to whether a shuttlecock or

a ball is used, the latter not requiring so small a ground as the

former. The sizes recommended vary from 40 ft. long by 20 ft. broad,

to 30 ft. long by 15 ft. broad. The ground is divided into courts, as

in Fig. 157, which represents the full-size.

The boundaries should be clearly defined by a white line; chalk

or whiting and water, laid on with a straight-edge and brush,

makes the best line. At the spots marked “pole,” which are just

half-way from the boundaries taken lengthways, and 2½ ft. within

the boundary measured across, poles should be erected, about 7

ft. high, to hang the net to. This, of course, is for the outdoor

game; indoors, the net may be suspended from nails, or hung to any

convenient projection. The net should be tightly stretched across

from pole to pole, at a height of 5 ft. from the ground. The depth

of the net varies from 9 in. to 3 ft., but the best is a medium

depth, 12-15 in. The poles should be supported with guy ropes. When

the net and poles are fixed, they present the appearance shown in

Fig 158. If shuttlecocks are used, the ordinary toy ones do very

well for indoors; but for outdoors a loaded shuttlecock is not so

much disturbed by the wind, and can be made to fly farther. Common

battledores will answer indoors; for outdoor games small racquet

bats are preferred, about 2 ft. long, with a widish face, and rather

more elliptical in the handle than the full-sized bat. Balls for the

outdoor game should be made of hollow indiarubber, about the size of

a tennis ball.

The outdoor game by 4 persons, played with a ball, is with slight

modifications the same as lawn tennis. The courts being marked out,

the players take their stand one in each court, and toss for first

“service.” The player winning the toss has choice of courts, and

places himself in the right-hand court of his side and serves first.

Serving is done by holding the ball in the left hand, the bat in

the right, and then, when in the act of dropping the ball from the

hand, but without allowing it to touch the ground, driving it with

the bat diagonally clean over the net into the opposite right-hand

court. When serving, the player may stand in any part of his court

he pleases, but he must have both feet within the boundary line.

The “servee” (i.e. the player served), who stands in the opposite

right-hand court, has to “take the service,” i.e. he has to hit

the ball back clean over the net, either before it touches the

ground or on its first bound. If he succeeds in doing either, his

adversaries have to return the ball again, clean over the net, and so

on alternately forwards and backwards until one side fails to comply

with the necessary conditions, when that round is over, and certain

scores accrue, as will be explained. After the first service in each

round, no distinction is made between right and left courts, nor as

to the player who may take the ball. On the first return the ball may

be sent into either court of the opposite side, and taken by either

player of that side, and so on in all subsequent returns of that

round.

If the ball touches the boundary line, it is out of the court. If

the conditions are complied with, it is a “good” service, and if the

servee fails to return the ball clean over the net, the server’s

side scores one point, called an “ace.” If the conditions are not

complied with, and the servee takes or attempts to take the serve,

it counts as a good service. But if the server does not comply with

the conditions, and the servee does not attempt to take the serve,

the server’s “hand is out.” There is, however, one exception to this,

viz. if the ball falls on the neutral ground short of the court, in

which case it is a “let”--that is, the server is let or allowed to

have another serve. Two consecutive lets put the server’s hand out.

Some players consider it a let if the ball is served into the wrong

court. This is perhaps the best rule for beginners, but for more

experienced performers serving into the wrong court should put the

server’s hand out. The server’s hand is also out if after the first

return either he or his partner fails to return the ball again clean

over the net by hitting it once only, or returns it so that it does

not fall into one of the opposite courts. If, however, the opponents

attempt to return the ball, notwithstanding that it falls out of the

court, the return is “good,” and it counts just the same as though

the ball had fallen within the court.

Spons' Household Manual A treasury of domestic receipts and a guide for home management · 第 140 / 162 段