A POEM IN PRAISE OF THE AUTHOR.

I that hate books, such as come daily out

By public license to the reading rout,

A due religion yet observe to this;

And here assert, if any thing's amiss,

It can be only the compiler's fault,

Who has ill-drest the charming author's thought,--

That was all right: her beauteous looks were join'd

To a no less admired excelling mind.

But, oh! this glory of frail Nature's dead,

As I shall be that write, and you that read.[142]

Once, to be out of fashion, I'll conclude

With something that may tend to public good;

I wish that piety, for which in heaven

The fair is placed--to the lawn sleeves were given:

Her justice--to the knot of men, whose care

From the raised millions is to take their share.

W.C.

The book claimed all the praise the finest genius could bestow on it.

But let us hear the editor.--He tells us, that "It is a vast

disadvantage to authors to publish their _private undigested thoughts_,

and _first notions hastily set down_, and designed only as materials for

a future structure." And he adds, "That the work may not come short of

that great and just expectation which the world had of her whilst she

was alive, and still has of everything that is the genuine product of

her pen, they must be told that this _was written for the most part in

haste_, were her _first conceptions_ and overflowings of her luxuriant

fancy, noted with _her pencil at spare hours_, or _as she was dressing_,

as her Πἁρεργον only; and _set down just as they came into her mind_."

All this will serve as a memorable example of the cant and mendacity of

an editor! and that total absence of critical judgment that could assert

such matured reflection, in so exquisite a style, could ever have been

"first conceptions, just as they came into the mind of Lady Gethin, as

she was dressing."

The truth is, that Lady Gethin may have had little concern in all these

"Reliquiæ Gethinianæ." They indeed might well have delighted their

readers; but those who had read Lord Bacon's Essays, and other writers,

such as Owen Feltham and Osborne, from whom these relics are chiefly

extracted, might have wondered that Bacon should have been so little

known to the families of the Nortons and the Gethins, to whom her

ladyship was allied; to Congreve and to the editor; and still more

particularly to subsequent compilers, as Ballard in his Memoirs, and

lately the Rev. Mark Noble in his Continuation of Granger; who both,

with all the innocence of Criticism, give specimens of these "Relics,"

without a suspicion that they were transcribing literally from Lord

Bacon's Essays! Unquestionably Lady Gethin herself intended no

imposture; her mind had all the delicacy of her sex; she noted much from

the books she seems most to have delighted in; and nothing less than the

most undiscerning friends could have imagined that everything written by

the hand of this young lady was her "first conceptions;" and _apologise_

for some of the finest thoughts, in the most vigorous style which the

English language can produce. It seems, however, to prove that Lord

Bacon's Essays were not much read at the time this volume appeared.

The marble book in Westminster Abbey must, therefore, lose most of its

leaves; but it was necessary to discover the origin of this miraculous

production of a young lady. What is Lady Gethin's, or what is not hers,

in this miscellany of plagiarisms, it is not material to examine. Those

passages in which her ladyship speaks in her own person probably are of

original growth; of this kind many evince great vivacity of thought,

drawn from actual observation on what was passing around her; but even

among these are intermixed the splendid passages of Bacon and other

writers.

I shall not crowd my pages with specimens of a very suspicious author.

One of her subjects has attracted my attention; for it shows the corrupt

manners of persons of fashion who lived between 1680 and 1700. To find a

mind so pure and elevated as Lady Gethin's unquestionably was,

discussing whether it were most advisable to have for a husband a

general lover, or one attached to a mistress, and deciding by the force

of reasoning in favour of the dissipated man (for a woman, it seems, had

only the alternative), evinces a public depravation of morals. These

manners were the wretched remains of the court of Charles the Second,

when Wycherley, Dryden, and Congreve seem to have written with much less

invention, in their indecent plots and language, than is imagined.

I know not which is worse, to be wife to a man that is

continually changing his _loves_, or to an husband that hath

but one mistress whom he loves with a constant passion. And if

you keep some measure of civility to her, he will at least

esteem you; but he of the roving humour plays an hundred

frolics that divert the town and perplex his wife. She often

meets with her husband's mistress, and is at a loss how to

carry herself towards her. 'Tis true the constant man is ready

to sacrifice, every moment, his whole family to his love; he

hates any place where she is not, is prodigal in what concerns

his love, covetous in other respects; expects you should be

blind to all he doth, and though you can't but see, yet must

not dare to complain. And though both, he who lends his heart

to whosoever pleases it, and he that gives it entirely to one,

do both of them require the exactest devoir from their wives,

yet I know not if it be not better to be wife to an inconstant

husband (provided he be something discreet), than to a constant

fellow who is always perplexing her with his inconstant humour.

For the unconstant lovers are commonly the best humoured; but

let them be what they will, women ought not to be unfaithful

for Virtue's sake and their own, nor to offend by example. It

is one of the best bonds of charity and obedience in the wife

if she think her husband wise, which she will never do if she

find him jealous.

"Wives are young men's mistresses, companions for middle age,

and old men's nurses."

The last degrading sentence is found alas! in the Moral Essays of Bacon.

Lady Gethin, with an intellect superior to that of the women of that

day, had no conception of the dignity of the female character, the

claims of virtue, and the duties of honour. A wife was only to know

obedience and silence: however, she hints that such a husband should not

be jealous! There was a sweetness in revenge reserved for some of these

married women.

Curiosities of Literature, Vol. 2 · 第 174 / 233 题