ANECDOTES OF ABSTRACTION OF MIND.

Some have exercised this power of abstraction to a degree that appears

marvellous to volatile spirits, and puny thinkers.

To this patient habit, Newton is indebted for many of his great

discoveries; an apple falls upon him in his orchard,--and the system of

attraction succeeds in his mind! he observes boys blowing soap bubbles,

and the properties of light display themselves! Of Socrates, it is said,

that he would frequently remain an entire day and night in the same

attitude, absorbed in meditation; and why should we doubt this, when we

know that La Fontaine and Thomson, Descartes and Newton, experienced the

same abstraction? Mercator, the celebrated geographer, found such

delight in the ceaseless progression of his studies, that he would never

willingly quit his maps to take the necessary refreshments of life. In

Cicero's Treatise on Old Age, Cato applauds Gallus, who, when he sat

down to write in the morning, was surprised by the evening; and when he

took up his pen in the evening was surprised by the appearance of the

morning. Buffon once described these delicious moments with his

accustomed eloquence:--"Invention depends on patience; contemplate your

subject long; it will gradually unfold, till a sort of electric spark

convulses for a moment the brain, and spreads down to the very heart a

glow of irritation. Then come the luxuries of genius! the true hours for

production and composition; hours so delightful, that I have spent

twelve and fourteen successively at my writing-desk, and still been in a

state of pleasure." The anecdote related of Marini, the Italian poet,

may be true. Once absorbed in revising his Adonis, he suffered his leg

to be burnt for some time, without any sensation.

Abstraction of this sublime kind is the first step to that noble

enthusiasm which accompanies Genius; it produces those raptures and that

intense delight, which some curious facts will explain to us.

Poggius relates of Dante, that he indulged his meditations more strongly

than any man he knew! whenever he read, he was only alive to what was

passing in his mind; to all human concerns, he was as if they had not

been! Dante went one day to a great public procession; he entered the

shop of a bookseller to be a spectator of the passing show. He found a

book which greatly interested him; he devoured it in silence, and

plunged into an abyss of thought. On his return he declared that he had

neither seen, nor heard, the slightest occurrence of the public

exhibition which had passed before him. This enthusiasm renders

everything surrounding us as distant as if an immense interval separated

us from the scene. A modern astronomer, one summer night, withdrew to

his chamber; the brightness of the heaven showed a phenomenon. He passed

the whole night in observing it, and when they came to him early in the

morning, and found him in the same attitude, he said, like one who had

been recollecting his thoughts for a few moments, "It must be thus; but

I'll go to bed before 'tis late!" He had gazed the entire night in

meditation, and did not know it.

This intense abstraction operates visibly; this perturbation of the

faculties, as might be supposed, affects persons of genius physically.

What a forcible description the late Madame Roland, who certainly was a

woman of the first genius, gives of herself on her first reading of

Telemachus and Tasso. "My respiration rose; I felt a rapid fire

colouring my face, and my voice changing, had betrayed my agitation; I

was Eucharis for Telemachus, and Erminia for Tancred; however, during

this perfect transformation, I did not yet think that I myself was any

thing, for any one. The whole had no connexion with myself, I sought for

nothing around me; I was them, I saw only the objects which existed for

them; it was a dream, without being awakened."--Metastasio describes a

similar situation. "When I apply with a little attention, the nerves of

my sensorium are put into a violent tumult. I grow as red in the face as

a drunkard, and am obliged to quit my work." When Malebranche first took

up Descartes on Man, the germ and origin of his philosophy, he was

obliged frequently to interrupt his reading by a violent palpitation of

the heart. When the first idea of the Essay on the Arts and Sciences

rushed on the mind of Rousseau, it occasioned such a feverish agitation

that it approached to a delirium.

This delicious inebriation of the imagination occasioned the ancients,

who sometimes perceived the effects, to believe it was not short of

divine inspiration. Fielding says, "I do not doubt but that the most

pathetic and affecting scenes have been writ with tears." He perhaps

would have been pleased to have confirmed his observation by the

following circumstances. The tremors of Dryden, after having written an

Ode, a circumstance tradition has accidentally handed down, were not

unusual with him; in the preface to his Tales he tells us, that in

translating Homer he found greater pleasure than in Virgil; but it was

not a pleasure without pain; the _continual agitation of the spirits_

must needs be a weakener to any constitution, especially in age, and

many pauses are required for refreshment betwixt the heats. In writing

the ninth scene of the second act of the Olimpiade, Metastasio found

himself in tears; an effect which afterwards, says Dr. Burney, proved

very contagious. It was on this occasion that that tender poet

commemorated the circumstance in the following interesting sonnet:--

SONNET FROM METASTASIO.

"_Scrivendo l'Autore in Vienna l'anno 1733 la sua Olimpiade si

senti commosa fino alle lagrime nell' esprimere la divisione di

due teneri amici: e meravigliandosi che un falso, e da lui

inventato disastro, potesse cagionargli una si vera passione,

si fece a riflettere quanto poco ragionevole e solido

fondamento possano aver le altre che soglion frequentamente

agitarci, nel corso di nostra vita_.

Sogni e favole io fingo, e pure in carte

Mentre favole, e sogni, orno e disegno,

In lor, (folle ch' io son!) prendo tal parte

Che del mal che inventai piango, e mi sdegno.

Ma forse allor che non m' inganna l'arte,

Più saggio io sono e l'agitato ingegno

Forse allo più tranquillo? O forse parte

Da più salda cagion l'amor, lo sdegno?

Ah che non sol quelle, ch'io canto, o scrivo

Favole son; ma quanto temo, o spero,

Tutt' è manzogna, e delirando io vivo!

Sogno della mia vita è il corso intero.

Deh tu, Signor, quando a destarmi arrivo

Fa, ch'io trovi riposo in sen del VERO.

_In 1733, the Author, composing his Olimpiade, felt himself

suddenly moved, even to tears, in expressing the separation of

two tender lovers. Surprised that a fictitious grief, invented

too by himself, could raise so true a passion, he reflected how

little reasonable and solid a foundation the others had, which,

so frequently agitated us in this state of our existence._

Curiosities of Literature, Vol. 2 · 第 111 / 233 题