CHAPTER XVIII

Messina--Inception of the phagocyte theory--Encouragement from

Virchow and Kleinenberg--First paper on phagocytosis at the Odessa

Congress in 1883--The question of Immunity--Article in Virchow's

_Archiv_, 1884.

At Messina, we settled in a suburb, the Ringo, on the quay of the

Straits, in a small flat with a garden and a splendid view over the

sea. We did not have much room, and the laboratory had to be installed

in the drawing-room, but, on the other hand, Elie only had to cross the

quay in order to find the fisherman who provided him with the material

needed for his researches and with whom we frequently went sailing.

Metchnikoff loved Messina, with its rich marine fauna and beautiful

scenery. The splendid view of the sea and the calm outline of the

Calabrian coast across the Straits delighted him. He enjoyed it all

the more after the many excitements of life at the University, and

eagerly gave himself up to his researches. Often, in later years, he

delighted to recall memories of that period, the more so that this was

connected with the principal phase of scientific activity which led to

the formation of his phagocyte theory. After the earthquake in 1908,

he wrote a few pages on Messina and ended his article by the following

lines:

Thus it was in Messina that the great event of my scientific life

took place. A zoologist until then, I suddenly became a pathologist.

I entered into a new road in which my later activity was to be

exerted.

It is with warm feeling that I evoke that distant past and with

tenderness that I think of Messina, of which the terrible fate has

deeply moved my heart.

They say that Messina will be rebuilt in the same place but in a

different way. Houses will be constructed of light materials, they

will be low, and the streets broad....

The town will be a new Messina, not "my Messina," not that with which

so many dear memories are associated in my mind....

Metchnikoff continued to study intracellular digestion and the origin

of the intestine. He foresaw that the solution of those problems

would lead to general results of great importance. The study of

medusæ and of their mesodermic digestion confirmed him more and more

in the conviction that the mesoderm was a vestige of elements with a

primitive _digestive_ function. In lower beings, such as sponges, this

function takes place without being differentiated, whilst with other

Coelentera and with some Echinoderma the _endoderm_ gives birth to

a digestive cavity; yet, the mobile cells of the _mesoderm_ preserve

their faculty of intracellular digestion. As he studied these phenomena

more closely, he ascertained that mesodermic cells accumulated around

grains of carmine introduced into the organism.

All this prepared the ground for the phagocyte theory, of which he

himself described the inception in the following words:

I was resting from the shock of the events which provoked my

resignation from the University and indulging enthusiastically in

researches in the splendid setting of the Straits of Messina.

One day when the whole family had gone to a circus to see some

extraordinary performing apes, I remained alone with my microscope,

observing the life in the mobile cells of a transparent star-fish

larva, when a new thought suddenly flashed across my brain. It struck

me that similar cells might serve in the defence of the organism

against intruders. Feeling that there was in this something of

surpassing interest, I felt so excited that I began striding up and

down the room and even went to the seashore in order to collect my

thoughts.

I said to myself that, if my supposition was true, a splinter

introduced into the body of a star-fish larva, devoid of

blood-vessels or of a nervous system, should soon be surrounded by

mobile cells as is to be observed in a man who runs a splinter into

his finger. This was no sooner said than done.

There was a small garden to our dwelling, in which we had a few days

previously organised a "Christmas tree" for the children on a little

tangerine tree; I fetched from it a few rose thorns and introduced

them at once under the skin of some beautiful star-fish larvæ as

transparent as water.

I was too excited to sleep that night in the expectation of

the result of my experiment, and very early the next morning I

ascertained that it had fully succeeded.

That experiment formed the basis of the phagocyte theory, to the

development of which I devoted the next twenty-five years of my life.

This very simple experiment struck Metchnikoff by its intimate

similarity with the phenomenon which takes place in the formation of

pus, the diapedesis[15] of inflammation in man and the higher animals.

The white blood corpuscles, or _leucocytes_, which constitute pus, are

mobile mesodermic cells. But, while with higher animals the phenomenon

is complicated by the existence of blood-vessels and a nervous system,

in a star-fish larva, devoid of those organs, the same phenomenon is

reduced to the accumulation of mobile cells around the splinter. This

proves that the essence of inflammation consists in the reaction of

the mobile cells, whilst vascular and nervous intervention has but a

secondary significance. Therefore, if the phenomenon is considered in

its simplest expression, inflammation is merely _a reaction of the

mesodermic cells against an external agent_.

[15] Migration of the white blood corpuscles (leucocytes) through

the walls of blood-vessels.

Metchnikoff then reasoned as follows: In man, microbes are usually

the cause which provokes inflammation; therefore it is against those

intruders that the mobile mesodermic cells have to strive. These mobile

cells must destroy the microbes by digesting them and thus bring about

a cure.

Inflammation is thus a _curative reaction_ of the organism, and morbid

symptoms are no other than the signs of the struggle between the

mesodermic cells and the microbes.

In order to verify these conjectures, he started studying the

englobing of microbes by mesodermic cells in larvæ and in other marine

invertebrates which he inoculated.

At that time, a well-known German scientist, Kleinenberg, was Professor

of Zoology at Messina. Metchnikoff imparted his ideas to him and showed

him his experiments. Kleinenberg encouraged him very much; he looked

upon his theory as "an Hippocratic thought" and advised him to publish

it at once.

Metchnikoff was also greatly encouraged by Virchow, who happened

to pass through Messina and came to see his preparations and his

experiments, which seemed to him conclusive. However, Virchow advised

him to proceed with the greatest prudence in their interpretation, as,

he said, the theory of inflammation admitted in contemporary medicine

was exactly contrary to Metchnikoff's. It was believed that the

leucocytes, far from destroying microbes, spread them by carrying them

and by forming a medium favourable to their growth.

Metchnikoff always preserved a deep gratitude towards Virchow and

Kleinenberg for the moral support which they gave him at that time.

* * * * *

When the hot weather came, we left Messina for Riva, a delicious summer

resort on the shores of the Lake of Garda. There, Metchnikoff wrote

his first memoir on the reaction of inflammation and on the digestion

of microbes by the mesodermic cells of lower invertebrates. On the way

back to Russia through Vienna, he went to see the Professor of Zoology,

Claus; he found other colleagues with him and expounded his theory

to them. They were much interested, and he asked them for a Greek

translation of the words "devouring cells," and that is how they were

given the name of _phagocytes_.

Claus asked him for his memoir for the Review which he edited and in

which it appeared soon afterwards, in 1883.[16] The new-born "phagocyte

theory" was thus very well received by naturalists and by Virchow, the

father of cellular pathology.

[16] _Arbeiten des zool. Inst. zu Wien_, Bd. v. Heft ii. p.

141. "Untersuchung über die intracelluläre Verdauung bei

wirbellosen Tieren," E. Metchnikoff.

Having returned to Russia, we went to the country, where Elie had to

attend to family business; nevertheless, he continued his researches

in every leisure moment. He had observed in Echinoderma that, during

the transformation of their larvæ, the parts becoming atrophied were

englobed by mesodermic mobile cells. In those observations he was

delighted to have found an example of _physiological inflammation_,

_i.e._ one which presented itself in normal and non-morbid conditions.

He thought he might observe it also during the metamorphosis of the

tadpole into a frog, whilst the tail was being atrophied. But he found

that, instead of the leucocytes of the blood, certain cells from the

muscular tissue were those which devoured the enfeebled elements of the

tail; he thus learnt that phagocytes might be, not only the white blood

corpuscles, but other cells of mesodermic origin.[17]

[17] It was only in 1892 that he completed and developed his

observations. He found that the cells of the sarcoplasma

of the muscular tissue devoured its contractile part, the

myoplasma.

In autumn 1883 he read his first paper on phagocytosis to a congress of

physicians and naturalists at Odessa.[18] He compared the phagocytes to

an army hurling itself upon the enemy and looked upon the phagocytic

reaction as a defensive force of the organism.

[18] This paper was entitled "Forces curatives de l'organisme."

In that paper itself and from that moment onwards, the trend of his

ideas towards optimism becomes visible. By discovering the phagocytic

reaction of the organism, he made a first breach in his philosophy

of human nature, hitherto so pessimistic; he discovered within it a

salutary element which could be utilised by science to combat its

discords. He began to have some faith in the power of knowledge, not

only for this struggle, but also for the establishment of a rational

conception of life in general. Thus he said in his paper to the Odessa

Congress:

The theoretical study of Natural History problems (in the largest

sense of the word) alone can provide a critical method for the

comprehension of truth and lead to a definite conception of life, or

at least allow us to approach one.

And yet, until then, the theory of phagocytosis as a curative force

of the organism was but a hypothesis, for he had not yet observed

_spontaneous phagocytosis in diseases_ and did not know pathogenic

microbes. He therefore sought to study them in lower animals, whose

simple structure made the observation easier. He found some small,

transparent, fresh-water crustaceans, called _daphniæ_, which were

diseased and easy to place alive under a microscope. These crustaceans

are often infected by a parasite fungus (_Monospora bicuspidata_), of

which the spores, shaped like sharp needles, are introduced with food

into the digestive tube, traverse the walls of it, and thus penetrate

into the general cavity of the body. They are immediately attacked by

mobile phagocytes, which either singly or in groups englobe them; if

the phagocytes succeed in digesting the spores, the daphnia recovers;

in the contrary case, the spores germinate and develop into small

fungi which invade the organism and kill it. The recovery or death of

the daphnia depends therefore on the issue of the struggle.[19] This

observation gave final confirmation to the hypothesis of the curative

forces of the organism.

[19] Virchow's _Archiv_, vol. 96, p. 177.

Metchnikoff was not content with observing lower animals but wished to

study the reaction of the organism of mammals in infectious diseases.

At that time, the best-known microbe was the bacillus of anthrax.

He therefore chose that for his researches and ascertained that

phagocytosis varied with the virulence of the microbes; thus, while

phagocytes did not attack virulent bacteria, they attacked and rapidly

digested attenuated bacteria. Moreover, he observed a very active

phagocytosis in refractory animals and the reverse in sensitive ones.

He thus came face to face with the question of _immunity_.

He approached it by a comparative examination of the reaction of

the organism of vaccinated rabbits and of non-vaccinated ones, and

ascertained that an active phagocytosis was only manifested in a

previously vaccinated organism. Metchnikoff explained these facts by

the theory that the phagocytes became accustomed, gradually, through

vaccination, to strive against more and more virulent microbes.

From that moment, immunity appeared to him as being no other than this

progressive hardening. He published his researches in 1884 in Virchow's

_Archiv_, and impatiently awaited medical reviews, hoping to find some

answer, but the memoir passed unnoticed; the full significance of it

had not been grasped.

Life of Elie Metchnikoff, 1845-1916 · 第 18 / 36 章