COURT DAY.

To a northern traveller in the southern states, there is scarcely any

thing more novel or entertaining than a _Court Day_. Familiar as the

occasion and its scenes may be to a Virginian, there is something in

the whole aspect of this monthly festival which rivets the attention

of a stranger. And I have not been without my suspicions that the

influence of this custom and its adjuncts upon society, manners, and

character has never been appreciated. In our northern country there

are no occasions upon which the whole population of a county, even as

represented by its leading freeholders, convenes at one spot. County

courts are attended by functionaries, litigants, and very near

neighbors, but not, as in the south, by the gentry and yeomanry of a

whole district.

The consequence of such an arrangement as that of the south is, that

all the landholders and gentlemen of a neighborhood become mutually

acquainted, and lay the foundation for friendly and hospitable

reciprocities, which may be continued through life. The whole texture

of society has a tincture from this intermingling. It is undeniable,

that while aristocratic family pride, and chivalrous elevation of

bearing, exist no where in greater vigor than at the south, there is a

freer intercourse on the court-house-lawn between the richest planter

and the honest poor man, than is ever witnessed in the manufacturing

districts of Connecticut or Pennsylvania. This constant mingling of

the aged with the young, tends to keep up national characteristics and

to perpetuate {434} ancient habits and sentiments. And let an

old-fashioned man be allowed to whisper in the ear of this innovating

age that all is not antiquated which is old, and that the hoary stream

of tradition brings down with it not only _prejudices_, but wholesome

_predilections_.

To enjoy a genuine and unsophisticated Court Day, one must select a

county in the heart of the real Old Dominion, where emigration has not

too much thinned the population, nor foreign settlers made the mass

heterogeneous. It should be moreover in a region where the increase of

villages has not modified the ancient character of the large estates.

I have in my mind's eye the very _beau ideal_ of an old Virginia Court

House. The edifice itself is neither large nor lofty, but

“time-honored” and solid, and embosomed in a grove of locusts, which

at the May Court fill the air with their balsamic odor. The lawn,

which surrounds the house and grove, has not the deep green of our

northern commons, nor is the earth so perfectly hidden by matted

grass, but it is sufficiently soft and fresh to tempt many a group of

loungers. But the scene becomes more lively as the day advances.

Stalls and booths are rapidly erecting, and wagons of vendibles are

disposed in rows; no doubt by pertinacious wanderers from New England.

The porches of two or three plain-looking stores are filling rapidly

with visiters who are arriving every moment. A northerner is amazed at

the number of equestrians, and the ease and non-chalance with which

even little boys manage their spirited horses. I must pass a thousand

traits which in the hands of Irving or Kennedy would afford a tempting

picture. The cordiality of greeting with which Virginians meet is

delightful; and from ample trial I am able to pronounce it sincere and

available. This heartiness is encouraged by such monthly gatherings.

It is vain to object to this vehement shaking of hands and emphatic

compellation. As my old pastor used to say, “The form without the

power is better than neither;” and as Solomon says, “He that is a

friend must _show_ himself friendly.” By the time of dinner, a

thousand morsels of business, postponed during the month, have been

transacted; a thousand items of precious little family news have been

exchanged; hundreds of clusters, under porch or tree, have discoursed

of the reigning political topic; or mayhap, the mighty mass has all

been moved toward some little eminence to hear the eloquence of a

genuine “stump-speech.”

From my very heart, northman as I am, I admire and affect this good

remnant of olden time. May no revised code ever disannul it, no

sapient convention ever parcel out your counties into little municipal

fragments!

I state it as an opinion very deliberately formed in my own mind,

after some opportunities of comparison, that the elocution of southern

men is more easy, more graceful, more natural, more vivacious, and

more pathetic, than that of their northern compatriots. This is fairly

to be traced to the influence of such occasions as the one which I

describe. The moveable and excitable throng of a court-house-green is

precisely the audience which awakens and inspires the orator. The tide

of feeling comes back upon him at every happy appeal, and redoubles

his energy. It was the Athenian _populace_, who “spent their time in

nothing else, but either to tell or to hear some new thing,” (what a

picture of a court day!) which made the Athenian _orator_. The

practice of addresses to the literal and real constituency by every

aspirant, brings into trial, very early, all the eloquence of the

state. The manner of the best models is in some small degree

perpetuated. The mere listening to such men as Patrick Henry, and John

Randolph, not to mention the living, affords a school of eloquence to

the youth of the country, and cultivates the taste of the people. And

then in every little group upon yonder green, there is an ardor of

conversation on political topics, which, as feeling rises, approaches

to the character of harangue. I have never heard the impassioned

conversation of southern men, in a tavern or by the way-side, without

observing the natural tendency to a higher tone of elocution than

would be tolerated in a similar circle at the north.

Whether the practice of “whittling,” during conversation, has any

connexion with ease of utterance, is a question too abstruse for my

present cursory investigation. The celebrated doctor Rush used

jocosely to characterize some of his southern students, by their

“_R-phobia et Cacoethes secandi_.” It may be noted as a token of the

“free-and-easy” manner of certain courts, that we have seen advocates

whittling during a defence, and judges whittling on the bench.

But finally, and most seriously, I trust no fanaticism of a faction at

the north will ever so far prevail against the good sense and sound

feeling of the community, as to interrupt the genial flow of

hospitality, with which in every _individual_ case I have known,

northern men have been received by the gentlemen of old Virginia.

The southern literary messenger, Vol. II., No. 7, June, 1836 · 第 28 / 47 题