On a second side these words are carved in the stone:—

_Sauveur des Pauvres à Neuhof_

_Père des Orphelins à Stanz_

_Fondateur de l’école_

_populaire à Burgdorf_

_Éducateur de l’humanité_

_à Yverdon_

_Tout pour les autres_, _pour lui_,—_rien_!

An older monument erected in 1846 by the Canton of Argovia bears this

same inscription, save that it adds, “Preacher to the people in ‘Leonard

and Gertrude.’ Man. Christian. Citizen. Blessed be his name!”

On the third side of the Yverdon Monument is Pestalozzi’s noble speech,

fine enough indeed, to be cut in stone:—

“_J’ai vécu moi-même_

_comme un mendiant_,

_pour apprendre à des_

_mendiants à vivre comme_

_des hommes_.”

We sat a long time on the great marble pedestal, gazing into the

benevolent face, and reviewing the simple, self-sacrificing life of the

great educator, and then started on a tour of inspection. After

wandering through most of the shops, buying photographs and mementoes,

Salemina discovered that she had left the expensive tumbler in one of

them. After a long discussion as to whether tumbler was masculine or

feminine, and as to whether “_Ai-je laissé un verre ici_?” or “_Est-ce

que j’ai laissé un verre ici_?” was the proper query, we retraced our

steps, Salemina asking in one shop, “_Excusez-moi_, _je vous prie_, _mais

ai-je laissé un verre ici_?”,—and I in the next, “_Je demands pardon_,

_Madame_, _est-ce que j’ai laissé un verre dans ce magasin-ci_?—_J’en ai

perdu un_, somewhere.” Finally we found it, and in response not to mine

but to Salemina’s question, so that she was superior and obnoxious for

several minutes.

Our next point of interest was the old castle, which is still a public

school. Finding the caretaker, we visited first the museum and library—a

small collection of curiosities, books, and mementoes, various portraits

of Pestalozzi and his wife, manuscripts and so forth. The simple-hearted

woman who did the honours was quite overcome by our knowledge of and

interest in her pedagogical hero, but she did not return the compliment.

I asked her if the townspeople knew about Friedrich Froebel, but she

looked blank.

“Froebel? Froebel?” she asked; “_qui est-ce_?”

“_Mais_, _Madame_,” I said eloquently, “_c’était un grand homme_! _Un

héros_! _Le plus grand élève de Pestalozzi_! _Aussi grand que

Pestalozzi soi-même_!”

(“PLUS grand! Why don’t you say _plus grand_?” murmured Salemina

loyally.)

“_Je ne sais_!” she returned, with an indifferent shrug of the shoulders.

“_Je ne sais_! _Il y a des autres_, _je crois_; _mais moi_, _je connais

Pestalozzi_, _c’est assez_!”

All the younger children had gone home, but she took us through the empty

schoolrooms, which were anything but attractive. We found an unhappy

small boy locked in one of them. I slipped behind the concierge to chat

with him, for he was so exactly like all other small boys in disgrace

that he made me homesick.

“_Tu étais méchant_, _n’est ce-pas_?” I whispered consolingly; “_mais tu

seras sage demain_, _j’en suis sûre_!”

I thought this very pretty, but he wriggled from under my benevolent

hand, saying “_Va_!” (which I took to be, “Go ’long, you!”) “_je n’étais

méchant aujourd’hui et je ne serai pas sage demain_!”

I asked the concierge if the general methods of Pestalozzi were still

used in the schools of Yverdon, “_Mais certainement_!” she replied as we

went into a room where twenty to thirty girls of ten years were studying.

There were three pleasant windows looking out into the street; the

ordinary platform and ordinary teacher’s table, with the ordinary teacher

(in an extraordinary state of coma) behind it; and rather rude desks and

seats for the children, but not a single ornament, picture, map, or case

of objects and specimens around the room. The children were nice, clean,

pleasant, stolid little things with braided hair and pinafores. The sole

decoration of the apartment was a highly-coloured chart that we had

noticed on the walls of all the other schoolrooms. Feeling that this

must be a sacred relic, and that it probably illustrated some of the

Pestalozzian foundation principles, I walked up to it reverently,

“_Qu’est-ce-que c’est cela_, _Madame_?” I inquired, rather puzzled by its

appearance.

“_C’est la méthode de Pestalozzi_,” the teacher replied absently.

I wished that we kindergarten people could get Froebel’s educational idea

in such a snug, portable shape, and drew nearer to gaze at it. I can

give you a very complete description of the pictures from memory, as I

copied the titles _verbatim et literatim_. The whole chart was a

powerful moral object-lesson on the dangers of incendiarism and the evils

of reckless disobedience. It was printed appropriately in the most lurid

colours, and divided into nine tableaux.

Penelope's Postscripts · 第 6 / 27 题