THE INVASION OF SAXONY, AND ITS RESULTS.

In the meantime the main armies had not been idle. The invasion of

Saxony was begun on the 16th of June by the Army of the Elbe and the

First Army. On the night of the 15th of June the Saxon army began its

retreat to Bohemia, detachments of pioneers tearing up the railroad

track between Rieza and Dresden, and between the latter city and

Bautzen. The work of destruction, except the burning of the bridge at

Rieza, was hurriedly and imperfectly done, and did not appreciably

delay the Prussian advance. The Army of the Elbe advanced from Torgau,

_via_ Wurzen, Dahlen and Strehla; a division to each road, and a

detachment from the right division moving _via_ Ostrau and Dobeln to

cover the right flank. The First Army advanced from the neighborhood

of Görlitz, through Löbau and Bautzen, a strong detachment being sent

out on the Zittau road, beyond Ostritz, to observe the passes of

Reichenberg and Gabel, for the army was making a flank march, and the

Austrians might attack through these passes. A cavalry detachment was

pushed out through Bischofswerda to feel the left of the Army of the

Elbe.

On the 18th of June the Army of the Elbe occupied Dresden, and pushed

its outposts beyond the city as far as Lockwitz and Pillnitz. On

the following day the junction of the two armies was perfected. The

1st Reserve Division was sent from Berlin to reinforce Herwarth Von

Bittenfeld, and the combined forces of the Army of the Elbe and the

First Army were placed under the command of Prince Frederick Charles.

To guard against a possible invasion of Saxony by the Bavarians,

measures were at once taken to fortify Dresden, which was occupied

by the 2nd Reserve Division from Berlin; Leipsic and Chemnitz were

occupied by Landwehr; and the Leipsic-Plauen railway beyond Werdau was

destroyed.

On the 17th of June the Emperor of Austria issued a manifesto, in which

he formally announced to his subjects the state of war existing between

Austria and Prussia. Italy declared war against Austria three days

later.

We can now see the immense results following from the thorough military

preparation of Prussia. Launching, as it were, a thunderbolt of

military force upon her enemies at the first moment of war, less than

two weeks sufficed for the complete conquest of Hanover, Hesse-Cassel

and Saxony. Indeed, four days had sufficed for the seizure of the

last two. The King of Hanover had been dethroned; the Elector of

Hesse-Cassel was a prisoner, and the King of Saxony was a fugitive with

his army in Bohemia. The military results were even greater than the

political consequences. The severed portions of the Prussian kingdom

were united. The Hanoverian army had been eliminated from the military

problem, and there was no longer any menace to Prussia from the rear.

Von Falckenstein was now free to turn his undivided attention to the

Bavarians and the Federal Corps, and the occupation of Saxony prevented

all possibility of a junction of the Bavarian and Saxon armies. But the

strategical advantages gained in regard to operations in Bohemia were

the grandest result of the occupation of Saxony.

We have seen that on the 14th of June the Army of the Elbe was

around Torgau, the First Army near Görlitz; and the Second Army in

the vicinity of Neisse; being thus separated from each other by from

100 to 125 miles. The Second Army covered Breslau, the Army of the

Elbe covered Berlin, and the First Army was in a position to support

either of the others. Geographical circumstances thus compelled the

separation of the Prussian armies, and only two of them were available

for the invasion of Bohemia. The occupation of Saxony changed matters

for the better. The distance between the Army of the Elbe and the First

Army was reduced to the extent of actual junction, and these combined

armies were only about 120 miles from Landshut, where the right of the

Second Army now rested, and with which there was communication by means

of the hill road of Schreiberschau. The entire force was now available

for the invasion of Bohemia; the northern passes of the Bohemian

frontier were secured; and if compelled to act upon the defensive,

Frederick Charles could find in the mountains of Southern Saxony many

advantageous positions for defensive battle.

The Prussian plan of operations required an advance of Frederick

Charles’ armies from Saxony into Bohemia, and an invasion of that

province by the Second Army, advancing from Silesia; both armies

to unite at Gitschin, or in its vicinity. It is clear that in thus

advancing from divergent bases, the Prussians gave to their adversary

the advantage of operating by interior lines; generally a serious

military error, as the general operating by interior lines, holding

one of the opponent’s armies by a containing force, and falling with

superior numbers upon the other, may defeat both in succession. Von

Moltke’s plan was, however, sound and proper, for the following reasons:

1. The geographical configuration of the Prussian frontier compelled

the separation of the Prussian armies, in order that Lusatia and

Silesia might both be protected from Austrian invasion; and the

only possible concentration that would not yield to the enemy the

advantage of the initiative, and permit him to invade Prussia, was a

concentration to the front, in the hostile territory.

2. The entire army “could not have advanced in effective order by one

set of mountain roads, but would have extended in columns so lengthened

that it would have been impossible to form to a front commensurate

with its numbers.”

3. The re-entering base of the Prussians would enable each of their

armies to cover its communications with its base, while one of these

armies would surely menace the communications of the Austrians, if Von

Benedek should advance against either.

4. The certainty that the Prussian armies could act with celerity, and

the probability that the Austrian army was not yet fully prepared for

prompt offensive maneuvers, justified the hope that the concentration

might be effected at a point some distance in front of the enemy’s

line. The distance from Görlitz and Neisse to Gitschin was less than

the distance from Olmütz, Brünn and Bömisch Trübau to the same point,

and there was an excellent prospect of being able to concentrate before

Von Benedek could get his army well in hand to strike the Prussian

armies separately.

5. By keeping up telegraphic communication between the two separated

armies, their co-operation and simultaneous action could be assured.

6. If the Prussians could reach the Iser and the Elbe without serious

check, the contracted theatre of operations would render Von Benedek’s

interior position one of danger, rather than one of advantage. Von

Moltke himself, in commenting upon his strategical combination, says:

“If it is advantageous for a general to place his army on an interior

line of operation, it is necessary, in order that he may profit by

it, to have sufficient space to enable him to move against one of

his adversaries at a distance of several days’ march, and to have

time enough then to return against the other. If this space is very

contracted, he will run the risk of having both adversaries on his

hands at once. When an army, on the field of battle, is attacked in

front and on the flank, it avails nothing that it is on an interior

line of operations. That which was a strategical advantage becomes a

tactical disadvantage. If the Prussians were allowed to advance to the

Iser and to the Elbe, if the several defiles which it was necessary to

pass fell into their power, it is evident that it would be extremely

perilous to advance between their two armies. In attacking one, the

risk would be incurred of being attacked in rear by the other.” The

combination, on the field of battle, of the two armies operating from

divergent bases, would admit of just such a front and flank attack

as would convert Von Benedek’s strategical advantage into a serious

tactical disadvantage. It would be a repetition of Waterloo.

7. A failure to unite before encountering the main force of the enemy,

though unfortunate, would not necessarily have been disastrous.

According to Jomini, the advantages of an interior position diminish as

the armies operating increase in size; for the following reasons:

(a). “Considering the difficulty of finding ground and time necessary

to bring a very large force into action on the day of the battle, an

army of 130,000 or 140,000 men may easily resist a much larger force.

(b). “If driven from the field, there will be at least 100,000 men to

protect and insure an orderly retreat and effect a junction with one of

the other armies.

(c). “The central army ... requires such a quantity of provisions,

munitions, horses and _materiel_ of every kind, that it will possess

less mobility and facility in shifting its efforts from one part of

the zone to another; to say nothing of the impossibility of obtaining

provisions from a region too restricted to support such numbers.

(d). “The bodies of observation detached from the central mass to hold

in check two armies of 135,000 men each must be very strong (from

80,000 to 90,000 each); and, being of such magnitude, if they are drawn

into a serious engagement, they will probably suffer reverses, the

effect of which might outweigh the advantages gained by the principal

army.”

Finally, the increased defensive power given to infantry by the

introduction of breech-loading rifles might be counted upon to increase

greatly the probability of either of the Prussian armies being able to

fight successfully a _purely defensive_ battle against the entire army

of Von Benedek, armed, as it was, with muzzle-loaders.

In view of these reasons, Von Moltke’s strategy was not only

justifiable, but perfect. The Prussian objective was the Austrian army,

wherever it might be.

Before the commencement of hostilities Von Benedek had, as we have

seen, announced his intention of invading Prussia. Two routes offered

themselves to his choice: one by way of Görlitz and Bautzen to Berlin;

the other by way of the valley of the Oder into Silesia. The latter

route was obstructed by the fortresses of Glatz, Neisse and Kosel;

the former would have led to the unobstructed occupation of Saxony,

and would have enabled the Bavarian army to concentrate, _via_ the

passes of the Saale and Wittenberg, with the Austrians and Saxons.

But, at a time when minutes were worth millions, Von Benedek was slow;

and the preparation and energy of the Prussians enabled them to take

the initiative and throw the Austrians upon the defensive in Bohemia.

Von Benedek then decided to concentrate his army in the vicinity of

Josephstadt and Königinhof; to hold the strong defiles of the Iser or

the Elbe with comparatively weak detachments, and throw his main army

upon the Crown Prince or Frederick Charles, as circumstances might

decide.

Von Benedek’s concentration began on the 18th of June; and on the 25th

his army stood as follows:

The Ist Corps, with one brigade of the IIIrd Corps and a cavalry

division, on the left bank of the Iser, from Turnau, through

Müchengrätz to Jung Buntzlau, where the retreating Saxons formed on the

left.

The Xth Corps, with one cavalry division, at Jaromir.

The IVth Corps at Opocno.

The VIth Corps at Solnitz.

The IIIrd Corps on the left of the VIth, at Tynist.

The VIIIth Corps at Wamberg.

The IId Corps at Geyersberg.

Four cavalry divisions were at Gabel, Leitomischel, Abtsdorf and

Policzka, respectively.

The force on the Iser, under Count Clam-Gallas, was thus opposed to

the entire army of Frederick Charles; while Von Benedek confronted

the Crown Prince with six corps. The Austrian line extended beyond

Gitschin, the point at which the Prussian armies were to concentrate.

The Campaign of Königgrätz · 第 8 / 29 题