LONDON, November 26, 1753

DEAR FRIEND: Fine doings at Manheim! If one may give credit to the weekly

histories of Monsieur Roderigue, the finest writer among the moderns; not

only ‘des chasses brillantes et nombreuses des operas ou les acteurs se

surpassent les jours des Saints de L. L. A. A. E. E. serenissimes

celebres; en grand gala’; but to crown the whole, Monsieur Zuchmantel is

happily arrived, and Monsieur Wartenslebeu hourly expected. I hope that

you are ‘pars magna’ of all these delights; though, as Noll Bluff says,

in the “Old Bachelor,” THAT RASCALLY GAZETTEER TAKES NO MORE NOTICE OF

YOU THAN IF YOU WERE NOT IN THE LAND OF THE LIVING. I should think that

he might at least have taken notice that in these rejoicings you appeared

with a rejoicing, and not a gloomy countenance; and you distinguished

yourself in that numerous and shining company, by your air, dress,

address, and attentions. If this was the case, as I will both hope and

suppose it was, I will, if you require it, have him written to, to do you

justice in his next ‘supplement’. Seriously, I am very glad that you are

whirled in that ‘tourbillon’ of pleasures; they smooth, polish, and rub

off rough corners: perhaps too, you have some particular COLLISION, which

is still more effectual.

Schannat’s “History of the Palatinate” was, I find, written originally in

German, in which language I suppose it is that you have read it; but, as

I must humbly content myself with the French translation, Vaillant has

sent for it for me from Holland, so that I have not yet read it. While

you are in the Palatinate, you do very well to read everything relative

to it; you will do still better if you make that reading the foundation

of your inquiries into the more minute circumstances and anecdotes of

that country, whenever you are in company with informed and knowing

people.

The Ministers here, intimidated on the absurd and groundless clamors of

the mob, have, very weakly in my mind, repealed, this session, the bill

which they had passed in the last for rendering Jews capable of being

naturalized by subsequent acts of parliament. The clamorers triumph, and

will doubtless make further demands, which, if not granted, this piece of

complaisance will soon be forgotten. Nothing is truer in politics, than

this reflection of the Cardinal de Retz, ‘Que le peuple craint toujours

quand on ne le craint pas’; and consequently they grow unreasonable and

insolent, when they find that they are feared. Wise and honest governors

will never, if they can help it, give the people just cause to complain;

but then, on the other hand, they will firmly withstand groundless

clamor. Besides that this noise against the Jew bill proceeds from that

narrow mobspirit of INTOLERATION in religious, and inhospitality in civil

matters; both which all wise governments should oppose.

The confusion in France increases daily, as, no doubt, you are informed

where you are. There is an answer of the clergy to the remonstrances of

the parliament, lately published, which was sent me by the last post from

France, and which I would have sent you, inclosed in this, were it not

too bulky. Very probably you may see it at Manheim, from the French

Minister: it is very well worth your reading, being most artfully and

plausibly written, though founded upon false principles; the ‘jus

divinum’ of the clergy, and consequently their supremacy in all matters

of faith and doctrine are asserted; both which I absolutely deny. Were

those two points allowed the clergy of any country whatsoever, they must

necessarily govern that country absolutely; everything being, directly or

indirectly, relative to faith or doctrine; and whoever is supposed to

have the power of saving and damning souls to all eternity (which power

the clergy pretend to), will be much more considered, and better obeyed,

than any civil power that forms no pretensions beyond this world.

Whereas, in truth, the clergy in every country are, like all other

subjects, dependent upon the supreme legislative power, and are appointed

by that power under whatever restrictions and limitations it pleases, to

keep up decency and decorum in the church, just as constables are to keep

peace in the parish. This Fra Paolo has clearly proved, even upon their

own principles of the Old and New Testament, in his book ‘de Beneficiis’,

which I recommend to you to read with attention; it is short. Adieu.

Letters to His Son, Complete On the Fine Art of Becoming a Man of the World and a Gentleman · 第 304 / 512 题