LETTER XCV

LONDON; December 12, O. S. 1749.

DEAR BOY: Lord Clarendon in his history says of Mr. John Hampden THAT HE

HAD A HEAD TO CONTRIVE, A TONGUE TO PERSUADE, AND A HAND TO EXECUTE ANY

MISCHIEF. I shall not now enter into the justness of this character of

Mr. Hampden, to whose brave stand against the illegal demand of

ship-money we owe our present liberties; but I mention it to you as the

character, which with the alteration of one single word, GOOD, instead of

MISCHIEF, I would have you aspire to, and use your utmost endeavors to

deserve. The head to contrive, God must to a certain degree have given

you; but it is in your own power greatly to improve it, by study,

observation, and reflection. As for the TONGUE TO PERSUADE, it wholly

depends upon yourself; and without it the best head will contrive to very

little purpose. The hand to execute depends likewise, in my opinion, in a

great measure upon yourself. Serious reflection will always give courage

in a good cause; and the courage arising from reflection is of a much

superior nature to the animal and constitutional courage of a foot

soldier. The former is steady and unshaken, where the ‘nodus’ is ‘dignus

vindice’; the latter is oftener improperly than properly exerted, but

always brutally.

The second member of my text (to speak ecclesiastically) shall be the

subject of my following discourse; THE TONGUE TO PERSUADE--as judicious,

preachers recommend those virtues, which they think their several

audiences want the most; such as truth and continence, at court;

disinterestedness, in the city; and sobriety, in the country.

You must certainly, in the course of your little experience, have felt

the different effects of elegant and inelegant speaking. Do you not

suffer, when people accost you in a stammering or hesitating manner, in

an untuneful voice, with false accents and cadences; puzzling and

blundering through solecisms, barbarisms, and vulgarisms; misplacing even

their bad words, and inverting all method? Does not this prejudice you

against their matter, be it what it will; nay, even against their

persons? I am sure it does me. On the other hand, do you not feel

yourself inclined, prepossessed, nay, even engaged in favor of those who

address you in the direct contrary manner? The effects of a correct and

adorned style of method and perspicuity, are incredible toward

persuasion; they often supply the want of reason and argument, but, when

used in the support of reason and argument, they are irresistible. The

French attend very much to the purity and elegance of their style, even

in common conversation; insomuch that it is a character to say of a man

‘qu’il narre bien’. Their conversations frequently turn upon the

delicacies of their language, and an academy is employed in fixing it.

The ‘Crusca’, in Italy, has the same object; and I have met with very few

Italians, who did not speak their own language correctly and elegantly.

How much more necessary is it for an Englishman to do so, who is to speak

it in a public assembly, where the laws and liberties of his country are

the subjects of his deliberation? The tongue that would persuade there,

must not content itself with mere articulation. You know what pains

Demosthenes took to correct his naturally bad elocution; you know that he

declaimed by the seaside in storms, to prepare himself for the noise of

the tumultuous assemblies he was to speak to; and you can now judge of

the correctness and elegance of his style. He thought all these things of

consequence, and he thought right; pray do you think so too? It is of the

utmost consequence to you to be of that opinion. If you have the least

defect in your elocution, take the utmost care and pains to correct it.

Do not neglect your style, whatever language you speak in, or whoever you

speak to, were it your footman. Seek always for the best words and the

happiest expressions you can find. Do not content yourself with being

barely understood; but adorn your thoughts, and dress them as you would

your person; which, however well proportioned it might be, it would be

very improper and indecent to exhibit naked, or even worse dressed than

people of your sort are.

I have sent you in a packet which your Leipsig acquaintance, Duval, sends

to his correspondent at Rome, Lord Bolingbroke’s book,--[“Letters on the

Spirit of Patriotism,” on the Idea of a Patriot King which he published

about a year ago.]--I desire that you will read it over and over again,

with particular attention to the style, and to all those beauties of

oratory with which it is adorned. Till I read that book, I confess I did

not know all the extent and powers of the English language. Lord

Bolingbroke has both a tongue and a pen to persuade; his manner of

speaking in private conversation is full as elegant as his writings;

whatever subject he either speaks or writes upon, he adorns with the most

splendid eloquence; not a studied or labored eloquence, but such a

flowing happiness of diction, which (from care perhaps at first) is

become so habitual to him, that even his most familiar conversations, if

taken down in writing, would bear the press, without the least correction

either as to method or style. If his conduct, in the former part of his

life, had been equal to all his natural and acquired talents, he would

most justly have merited the epithet of all-accomplished. He is himself

sensible of his past errors: those violent passions which seduced him in

his youth, have now subsided by age; and take him as he is now, the

character of all-accomplished is more his due than any man’s I ever knew

in my life.

But he has been a most mortifying instance of the violence of human

passions and of the weakness of the most exalted human reason. His

virtues and his vices, his reason and his passions, did not blend

themselves by a gradation of tints, but formed a shining and sudden

contrast. Here the darkest, there the most splendid colors; and both

rendered more shining from their proximity. Impetuosity, excess, and

almost extravagance, characterized not only his passions, but even his

senses. His youth was distinguished by all the tumult and storm of

pleasures, in which he most licentiously triumphed, disdaining all

decorum. His fine imagination has often been heated and exhausted, with

his body, in celebrating and deifying the prostitute of the night; and

his convivial joys were pushed to all the extravagance of frantic

Bacchanals. Those passions were interrupted but by a stronger ambition.

The former impaired both his constitution and his character, but the

latter destroyed both his fortune and his reputation.

He has noble and generous sentiments, rather than fixed reflected

principles of good nature and friendship; but they are more violent than

lasting, and suddenly and often varied to their opposite extremes, with

regard to the same persons. He receives the common attentions of civility

as obligations, which he returns with interest; and resents with passion

the little inadvertencies of human nature, which he repays with interest

too. Even a difference of opinion upon a philosophical subject would

provoke, and prove him no practical philosopher at least.

Notwithstanding the dissipation of his youth, and the tumultuous

agitation of his middle age, he has an infinite fund of various and

almost universal knowledge, which, from the clearest and quickest

conception, and happiest memory, that ever man was blessed with, he

always carries about him. It is his pocket-money, and he never has

occasion to draw upon a book for any sum. He excels more particularly in

history, as his historical works plainly prove. The relative political

and commercial interests of every country in Europe, particularly of his

own, are better known to him, than perhaps to any man in it; but how

steadily he has pursued the latter, in his public conduct, his enemies,

of all parties and denominations, tell with joy.

He engaged young, and distinguished himself in business; and his

penetration was almost intuition. I am old enough to have heard him speak

in parliament. And I remember that, though prejudiced against him by

party, I felt all the force and charms of his eloquence. Like Belial in

Milton, “he made the worse appear the better cause.” All the internal and

external advantages and talents of an orator are undoubtedly his. Figure,

voice, elocution, knowledge, and, above all, the purest and most florid

diction, with the justest metaphors and happiest images, had raised him

to the post of Secretary at War, at four-and-twenty years old, an age at

which others are hardly thought fit for the smallest employments.

During his long exile in France, he applied himself to study with his

characteristical ardor; and there he formed and chiefly executed the plan

of a great philosophical work. The common bounds of human knowledge are

too narrow for his warm and aspiring imagination. He must go ‘extra

flammantia maenia Mundi’, and explore the unknown and unknowable regions

of metaphysics; which open an unbounded field for the excursion of an

ardent imagination; where endless conjectures supply the defect of

unattainable knowledge, and too often usurp both its name and its

influence.

He has had a very handsome person, with a most engaging address in his

air and manners; he has all the dignity and good-breeding which a man of

quality should or can have, and which so few, in this country at least,

really have.

He professes himself a deist; believing in a general Providence, but

doubting of, though by no means rejecting (as is commonly supposed) the

immortality of the soul and a future state.

Upon the whole, of this extraordinary man, what can we say, but, alas,

poor human nature!

In your destination, you will have frequent occasions to speak in public;

to princes and states abroad; to the House of Commons at home; judge,

then, whether eloquence is necessary for you or not; not only common

eloquence, which is rather free from faults than adorned by beauties; but

the highest, the most shining degree of eloquence. For God’s sake, have

this object always in your view and in your thoughts. Tune your tongue

early to persuasion; and let no jarring, dissonant accents ever fall from

it, Contract a habit of speaking well upon every occasion, and neglect

yourself in no one. Eloquence and good-breeding, alone, with an exceeding

small degree of parts and knowledge, will carry a man a great way; with

your parts and knowledge, then, how far will they not carry you? Adieu.

Letters to His Son, Complete On the Fine Art of Becoming a Man of the World and a Gentleman · 第 132 / 512 题