CHAPTER II

MODUS OPERANDI

Before considering the "modus operandi" of chlorine and hypochlorites,

it will be advisable to take up the composition of the latter substances

and particularly that of "bleach." Bleach is manufactured by passing

chlorine gas over slaked lime and the ensuing reactions are often

represented by the equation Ca(OH)_{2} + Cl_{2} = CaOCl_{2} + H_{2}O.

This represents the substance formed as a pure oxychloride of calcium

which contains approximately 50 per cent of chlorine, but the article

commercially produced never contains this amount of chlorine, the usual

percentage being from 35-37. The general composition of commercial

bleach is fairly uniform. This is shown in the following analyses of

which two are of German bleach examined by Lunge and one of Canadian

manufacture analysed by the author.

-------------------------------+----------------+--------

| Lunge. | Race.

-------------------------------+--------+-------+--------

| % | % | %

Available chlorine | 37.00 | 38.30 | 37.50

Chlorine as chlorides | 0.35 | 0.59 | 0.52

Chlorine as chlorates | 0.25 | 0.08 | 0.18

Lime | 44.49 | 43.34 | 44.12

Magnesia | 0.40 | 0.31 | 1.28

Iron oxide | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.11

Alumina | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.46

Carbon dioxide | 0.18 | 0.31 | 0.22

Silica | 0.40 | 0.30 | 0.52

Water and undetermined | 16.45 | 16.32 | 15.09

-------------------------------+--------+-------+--------

From these analyses the constitutional of commercial bleach might be

represented by the formula

4CaOCl_{2}.2Ca(OH)_{2}.5H_{2}O

which assumes it to contain:

68.0 per cent of calcium hypochlorite,

20.0 per cent of calcium hydroxide,

and 12.0 per cent of water.

In this formula calcium hypochlorite has been written CaOCl_{2}, but

this substance actually contains one atom of oxygen less than the true

hypochlorite, which has the constitutional formula ClO-Ca-OCl. This

difference led some of the earlier chemists to regard CaOCl_{2} as a

mixture of equal molecules of calcium chloride and calcium hypochlorite

(CaCl_{2} + Ca(OCl)_{2} = 2CaOCl_{2}), but it has been definitely

established that no calcium chloride exists in the free state in dry

commercial bleach.

Since the very earliest days when the process of bleaching was

investigated it was considered to be a process of oxidation and it is

not surprising that Lavoisier and his pupils, who had noted the strong

decolourising action of the gas discovered previously by Scheele, should

regard it as a compound that contained oxygen. They were confirmed in

this view by the fact that an aqueous solution of the gas slowly evolved

oxygen when placed in bright sunlight, and lost its bleaching

properties. Watt disproved this and showed that the evolution of oxygen

was due to the action of the chlorine on water.

Cl_{2} + H_{2}O = 2HCl + O.

The bleaching action was not due to the chlorine "per se" but to the

nascent oxygen produced in the presence of moisture. Later, when bleach

and other chlorine compounds came into use as deodourisers, their action

was attributed to the oxygen produced and when their germicidal

properties became known it was natural to assume that the destruction of

bacteria was due to the same cause. Some of the earlier experimental

work supported this view. Fischer and Proskauer[1] found that humidity

played an important part in chlorine disinfection, probably because it

favoured oxidation. In air saturated with moisture micro-organisms were

killed by 0.3 per cent of chlorine in three hours but when the air was

dry practically no action occurred. They concluded that chlorine was not

directly toxic. Warouzoff, Winogradoff, and Kolessnikoff[2] were unable

to confirm the results of Fischer and Proskauer and found that a mixture

of chlorine gas and air killed tetanus spores in one minute.

The nascent oxygen hypothesis was clearly and succinctly expressed by

Prof. Leal during the hearing of the Boonton, N. J., case and the

following abstracts have been taken from his evidence:

"... That on the addition of bleach to water the loosely formed

combination forming the bleach splits up into chloride of calcium and

hypochlorite of calcium. The chloride of calcium being inert, the

hypochlorite acted upon by the carbonic acid in the water either free or

half bound, splits up into carbonate of calcium and hypochlorous acid.

The hypochlorous acid in the presence of oxidisable matter gives off its

oxygen; hydrochloric acid being left. The hydrochloric acid then drives

off the weaker carbonic acid and unites with the calcium forming

chloride of calcium.

"That the process was wholly an oxidising one, the work being done

entirely by the oxygen set free from the hypochlorous acids in the

presence of oxidizable matter....

"We have used during our investigations, the term 'potential oxygen' as

expressing its factor of power. When set free, it is really nascent or

atomic oxygen and is, in its most active state, entirely different from

the oxygen normally in water...."

The reactions suggested are expressed in the following equations:

(i). 2CaOCl_{2} = CaCl_{2} + Ca(OCl)_{2}

(ii). Ca(OCl)_{2} + CO_{2} + H_{2}O = CaCO_{3} + 2HClO

(iii). 2HClO = 2HCl + O_{2}

(iv). CaCO_{3} + 2HCl = CaCl_{2} + CO_{2} + H_{2}O.

Phelps, during the hearing of this case, suggested that hypochlorites

were directly toxic to micro-organisms but this view was not supported

by any definite evidence and the nascent oxygen hypothesis met with

almost universal acceptance. Investigations made by the author in 1915,

1916 and 1917 have produced data which cannot be adequately explained by

the nascent oxygen hypothesis.[3]

The disinfecting action of bleach can be most conveniently considered by

regarding it as a heterogeneous mixture of the reactants and resultants

of the reaction

CaO + H_{2}O + Cl_{2} <=> CaOCl_{2} + H_{2}O

which is in equilibrium for the temperature and pressure obtaining

during the process of manufacture. Under suitable physical conditions

the chlorine content can be increased to 40-42 per cent but such a

product is not so stable as those represented by the analyses on page 14

and which contain approximately 20 per cent of excess hydrate of lime.

The stability of bleach depends upon this excess of base (Griffen and

Hedallen[4]) and although magnesia can be partially substituted for this

excess of lime, a minimum of 5 per cent of free hydrate of lime is

required to ensure stability.

On dissolving bleach in water the first action is the decomposition of

calcium oxychloride into an equal number of molecules of calcium

hypochlorite and calcium chloride.

2CaOCl_{2} = Ca(OCl)_{2} + CaCl_{2}.

In dilute solution these salts are dissociated and hydrolysis tends to

occur in accordance with the equations

2Ca(OCl)_{2} + 4H_{2}O <=> 2Ca(OH)_{2} + HOCl + HCl and

CaCl_{2} + 2H_{2}O <=> Ca(OH)_{2} + 2HCl.

Calcium hydrate and hydrochloric acid are both practically completely

dissociated, i.e. there is a large and equal quantity of H^{.} and OH',

and the product is much greater than K_{_w_} (ionic product of water),

and hence there is a combination of these ions, leaving the solution

neutral and no undissociated acid or base exists. This statement is only

approximately correct as hydrochloric acid is slightly more dissociated

than calcium hydroxide (ratio 9:8) and the solution is consequently

slightly acid, i.e. the H^{.} concentration is greater than 1 x 10^{-7}.

Hypochlorous acid is only very slightly dissociated, especially in the

presence of the OCl' ion due to the dissociation of the Ca(OCl)_{2}, as

compared with Ca(OH)_{2} and hydrolysis of the Ca(OCl)_{2} proceeds with

increased dilution. The action is best represented by the equation

2Ca(OCl)_{2} + 2H_{2}O <=> CaCl_{2} + Ca(OH)_{2} + 2HOCl

The hydrolytic constant of hypochlorous acid has apparently not been

determined but as the acid is weaker than carbonic acid, which has a

hydrolytic constant of 1 x 10^{-4}, the value is probably between 1 x

10^{-3} and 1 x 10^{-4}. From the formula _x_^{2}/(1 - _x_)_v_ =

_k__{_wv_} in which 1 mole of pure Ca(OCl)_{2} is dissolved in _v_

litres, _x_ is the fraction hydrolysed, and _k__{_wv_} is the hydrolytic

constant, complete hydrolysis occurs (_x_ = 1) when _v_ is not greater

than 1 x 10^{4} litres. This is equivalent to a concentration of not

less than 7.1 p.p.m. of available chlorine. Solutions of pure

hypochlorites are alkaline in reaction because of the excess of hydroxyl

ions (minimum concentration 1 x 10^{-4}). In solutions of bleach the

hydrolytic action is retarded by the OH' due to the free base, and

accelerated by the excess of H^{.} caused by the dissociation and

partial hydrolysis of CaCl_{2}; the final result is determined by the

relative proportions and the effect of the free base usually

preponderates. The addition of any substance that reduces the OH'

concentration enables hydrolysis to proceed to completion and affords a

rational explanation of the fact that solutions of bleach, on

distillation with such weak acids as boric acid, yield a solution of

hypochlorous acid. It also explains why the addition of an acid is

necessary in Bunsen's method (_vide_ p. 79) of analysing hypochlorite

solutions. It has been stated that when hydrochloric acid is employed

the increase in the oxidising power is due to the action of the acid

upon calcium chloride but this never occurs under ordinary conditions;

weak acids such as carbonic or acetic will give practically the same

result as hydrochloric acid in solutions of bleach of the strength used

in water treatment. The slightly higher result obtained with strong

acids is due to the decomposition of chlorates.

The effect of dilution alone is shown by the data given below. A 2 per

cent bleach solution, containing very little excess base, was diluted

with distilled water and the various dilutions titrated with

thiosulphate after the addition of potassium iodide. In one series the

solutions were titrated directly, and after acidification in the other.

The results[A] were as follows:

HYDROLYSIS OF BLEACH SOLUTION

-----------------------------------+-----------------------

Strength of Solution. Grams Bleach | Direct Titration x 100

Per 100 c.cms. | --------------------.

| Acid Titration

-----------------------------------+-----------------------

2.0 | 30.8

0.2 | 34.3

0.1 | 41.8

0.02 | 67.5

0.002 | 100.0

-----------------------------------+-----------------------

[A] Corrected for the alkali produced by HClO + 2KI = KCl + KOH +

I_{2}.

Although every precaution was taken to exclude carbonic acid, a portion

of the hydrolysis was probably due to this acid, which would remove

calcium hydrate from the sphere of action and consequently alter the

equilibrium. The above figures are only applicable to the particular

sample used; other samples containing different excesses of base would

yield different hydrolytic values. The results are in agreement with the

hypothesis presented and confirm the theoretical deduction that very

dilute bleach solutions are completely hydrolysed if no salts are

present that will dissociate and increase the OH' concentration.

Hydrolysis is reduced by caustic alkalies and alkaline carbonates, and

increased by acids and acid carbonates that reduce the OH'

concentration.

The effect of chlorides is anomalous and no adequate explanation for

their action can be given at present. The addition of small quantities

of sodium chloride (0.1 per cent) increases the hydrolysis of bleach

solutions but much larger quantities tend to the opposite direction.

The effect of these substances upon the velocity of the germicidal

action of bleach solutions is in the same direction as the hydrolysing

effect.[4] Sodium chloride in quantities up to 10 parts per million has

a very limited effect but larger quantities (90 p.p.m.) increase the

velocity of the reaction. Sodium chloride, in the absence of

hypochlorites, was found to have no influence upon the viability of _B.

coli_ in water.

In quantities up to approximately 5 p.p.m., sodium hydroxide has but

little influence; 5-10 p.p.m. reduce the velocity to a marked degree,

but when the quantity of caustic is still further increased the

germicidal action of the alkali commences to be appreciable and may

nullify the retarding action on the hypochlorite. Normal carbonates tend

to reduce the velocity of the germicidal action and bicarbonates to

increase it.

Sulphuric acid, even in very small quantities (5 p.p.m.), has a marked

accelerating effect and the total effect produced is much greater than

can be accounted for by the germicidal activity of the acid alone. Weak

acids such as carbonic acid and acetic acid are also effective

accelerators. In one experiment a 0.01 per cent solution of bleach was

found to be 40 per cent hydrolysed. By passing carbonic acid gas this

was increased to 95 per cent and the velocity of the germicidal action

of this solution was found to be approximately 100 per cent greater than

that of the uncarbonated one. Norton and Hsu[5] have shown that the

germicidal activity of some disinfectants is a function of the hydrogen

ion concentration, but this factor is insufficient to account for the

effect of acids on bleach solutions.

The effect of sodium chloride on the bacteriological results, like that

on the hydrolytic constant, is anomalous. Similar effects have been

observed on the addition of this salt to phenol and other disinfectants.

The _raison d'etre_ of the increased activity is obscure but it is

possible that the salt renders the organisms more susceptible to the

action of the germicide.

Ammonia, though decreasing the hydrogen ion concentration of bleach and

other hypochlorite solutions, markedly increases the velocity of the

reaction; chlorinated derivatives of ammonia (chloramines), which have a

specific germicidal action, are formed. These will be discussed at

length in Chapter IX, p. 115.

Rideal[6] has shown that the addition of ammonia to sodium hypochlorite

destroys the bleaching activity in acid solution. This has been found by

the author to be also true for calcium hypochlorite (bleach). If the

bleaching effect is due to oxidation, the oxidising power of

hypochlorites must be considered to be destroyed by the addition of

ammonia. The property of oxidising organic matter in water is also

destroyed; this is well illustrated in Table II which shows the rate of

absorption of chlorine and chloramine by the Ottawa River water. The

water used in this experiment contained 40 p.p.m. of colour and absorbed

9.5 p.p.m. of oxygen (30 mins. at 100 deg. C.).

TABLE II.[A]

------------------+-------------------------------------------------

| ABSORPTION OF AVAILABLE CHLORINE AT 63 deg. F.

Time of Contact +----------------------+--------------------------

Minutes. | Chlorine as Bleach. | Chlorine as Chloramine.

------------------+----------------------+--------------------------

Nil. | 10.00 | 9.98

5 | 6.50 | 9.98

10 | 5.91 | 9.90

20 | 5.18 | 9.90

40 | 4.47 | 9.84

60 | 3.90 | 9.84

80 | 3.65 | 9.84

20 hours | .... | 9.68

------------------+----------------------+--------------------------

[A] Results are parts per million.

From a consideration of these and other experiments made by the author

in January, 1916, it became apparent that the nascent oxygen hypothesis

entirely failed to explain the results obtained, and that they must be

attributed to a direct toxic action of the chlorine or chloramine.

Dakin et al.[7] arrived at a similar conclusion from a consideration of

the results obtained during the use of hypochlorite solutions in the

treatment of wounds by Carrel's method of irrigation. They attributed

the marked beneficial action to the formation of chloramines _in situ_

by the action of hypochlorous acid upon amino acids and proteid bodies.

Compound chloramines (chlorinated aminobenzoic acids) were prepared in

the laboratory and found to give excellent results in reducing wound

infection. Later, other compounds were prepared for the purpose of

sterilising small quantities of water for the use of mobile troops (see

p. 128).

Rideal[6] was the first to note the strong germicidal power of

chloramine and attributed the persistent germicidal activity of

hypochlorites in sewage to the formation of chloramine and chloramine

derivatives.

Further evidence against the nascent oxygen theory of chlorine

disinfection is to be found in the fact that such active oxidising

agents as sodium, potassium, and hydrogen peroxides have a much lower

germicidal activity than chlorine when compared on the basis of their

oxygen equivalents. Table III shows chlorine to be approximately five

times as active as potassium permanganate when compared on this basis.

TABLE III.[A]--COMPARISON OF BLEACH AND POTASSIUM PERMANGANATE

-----------+------------------+-------------------

| BLEACH |

|Available Chlorine| POTASSIUM

Contact | 0.35 p.p.m. | PERMANGANATE.

Period. +------------------+-------------------

|Oxygen Equivalent. Parts Per Million.

+--------+---------+---------+---------

| 0.08 | 0.133 | 0.266 | 0.400

-----------+--------+---------+---------+---------

Nil | 140 | ... | ... | ...

30 mins | 90 | 122 | 115 | 110

1 hour | 68 | 115 | 100 | 80

1-1/2 hours| 63 | 108 | 95 | 75

4 hours | 50 | 95 | 80 | 50

-----------+--------+---------+---------+---------

[A] Results are _B. coli_ per 10 c.cms.

The germicidal activity of oxidising agents has been shown by Novey and

others to be somewhat proportional to the energy liberated during the

reaction but even when this factor is taken into consideration chlorine

compounds are more active than other oxidising agents. Hypochlorous acid

is far superior to hydrogen peroxide as a germicidal agent and is as

active as ozone, which liberates a greater amount of energy.

2HClO = 2HCl + O_{2} + 18,770 calories

2H_{2}O_{2} = 2H_{2}O + O_{2} + 46,120 calories

2O_{3} = 3O_{2} + 60,000 calories.

Again, solutions of chlorine gas and hypochlorites having the same

oxidising activity, as determined by titration with thiosulphate after

the addition of potassium iodide and acid, i.e. contain equal amounts of

available chlorine, show approximately the same germicidal activity in

water. On the addition of ammonia, the hypochlorite solutions retain

their ability to liberate iodine from potassium iodide (Wagner test) but

the property of oxidising such dyestuffs as indigo is destroyed and the

germicidal activity is increased. Ammonia, when added to solutions of

chlorine gas, diminishes the property of liberating iodine from

potassium iodide, the bleaching effect on dyestuffs, and the germicidal

action. It is often assumed that chlorine forms hypochlorous acid on

solution in water Cl_{2} + H_{2}O = HClO + HCl but the results obtained

on the addition of ammonia indicate that either very little hypochlorous

acid is formed or that ammonia and hypochlorous acid do not form

chloramine in the presence of hydrochloric acid.

When chlorine gas was treated with a 0.5 per cent solution of ammonia in

the proportion of 1 molecule of chlorine to 1.90-1.95 molecules of

ammonia, Noyes and Lyon[8] found that nitrogen and nitrogen-trichloride

were formed in equimolar quantities.

12NH_{3} + 6Cl_{2} = N_{2} + NCl_{3} + 9NH_{4}Cl.

Bray and Dowell[9] showed that this reaction depended upon the hydrogen

ion concentration and proceeded in accordance with the following

equations:

(i). Acid solution 4NH_{3} + 3Cl_{2} = NCl_{3} + 3NH_{4}Cl

(ii). Alkaline solution 8NH_{3} + 3Cl_{2} = N_{2} + 6NH_{4}Cl.

In (i) with a ratio of chlorine to ammonia of 3:1 by weight, one-half of

the chlorine is lost as ammonium chloride and one-half forms nitrogen

trichloride, concerning which comparatively little is known; in (ii) the

whole of the chlorine forms ammonium chloride, which has no germicidal

value.

The effect of ammonia on the germicidal action of a solution of chlorine

gas is shown in the Table IV.

TABLE IV.[A]--EFFECT OF AMMONIA ON CHLORINE GAS SOLUTION

_Conditions._ Colour of water 40 p.p.m. Turbidity, 5 p.p.m.

---------+----------------------------------------

|Available Chlorine 0.20 p.p.m., Ammonia.

Contact | Parts Per Million.

Period. +---------+---------+----------+---------

| Nil. | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.20

---------+---------+---------+----------+---------

Nil. | 130 | ... | ... | ...

10 mins. | 135 | 140 | 130 | 135

1 hour | 130 | 130 | 128 | 120

4 hours | 120 | 112 | 110 | 105

24 hours | 120 | 145 | 160 | 170

---------+---------+---------+----------+---------

[A] Results are _B. coli_ per 10 c.cms.

Even when the ratio of Cl:NH_{3} was 4:1 by weight, practically the same

as was used in the experiments of Noyes and Lyon, and Bray and Dowell,

quoted above, the germicidal action was totally destroyed and the

24-hour results showed aftergrowths which were somewhat proportional to

the amount of ammonia added. This was probably due to the formation of

ammonium chloride, which provided additional nutriment for the

organisms.

It has often been assumed that hypochlorite solutions are decomposed on

addition to water containing free or half-bound carbonic acid with the

production of free chlorine, but no evidence has been adduced in

support. Free chlorine can be separated from hypochlorous acid in

aqueous solution by extraction with carbon tetrachloride and when this

solvent is shaken with a carbonated hypochlorite solution it is found

that only traces of chlorine are removed.

Hypochlorous acid reacts with hydrochloric acid with the evolution of

free chlorine HClO + HCl = Cl_{2} + H_{2}O but in very dilute solution

the amount of free chlorine formed is exceedingly minute. Jakowkin[10]

has shown that this reaction does not proceed to completion and that the

concentration of free chlorine can be calculated from the equation HClO

x H^{.} x Cl' = 320Cl_{2} in which the reactions are expressed in gram

molecules per litre. The hydrogen ions and chlorine ions are obtained

from the dissociation of carbonic acid (H_{2}CO_{3} <=> H^{.} +

HCO_{3}') and chlorides (NaCl <=> Na^{.} + Cl') and also by the

dissociation of hydrochloric acid produced by the interaction of

hypochlorous acid and organic matter. HClO = O + HCl <=> H^{.} + Cl'. If

the formula of Jakowkin can be correctly applied to solutions containing

fractions of a part per million of hypochlorous acid the free chlorine

liberated by the addition of 1 p.p.m. of bleach to a water low in

chlorides would be of the order 10^{-7}-10^{-8} p.p.m.

_Sodium hypochlorite_ is probably hydrolysed in dilute solution in a

manner similar to that of bleach.

2NaOCl = NaCl + NaOH + HClO.

For solutions containing equal amounts of available chlorine,

electrolytic sodium hypochlorite is more dissociated than bleach because

of the absence of an excess of base, and this, together with the

presence of sodium chloride, accounts for the slightly higher germicidal

velocity obtained. The experience of pulp mills, with bleach and

electrolytic hypochlorites, confirms this: the latter is a much quicker

bleaching agent than bleach and it is often so rapid as to make it

desirable to reduce the velocity by the addition of soda ash.

Regarding hypochlorite solutions a phenomenon of more scientific

interest than of practical importance has been noted by Breteau[12] who

found that alkaline solutions of sodium hypochlorite containing 0.94 per

cent of available chlorine lost 3.6 per cent of their titer on dilution

with 80 volumes of water; also that this loss was increased by the

addition of small quantities of salt (sodium chloride) and more so by

carbonates and bicarbonates. The author has noted similar losses on

diluting bleach solutions and that the loss increased on standing. The

loss can be explained by the decomposition of hypochlorous acid, in the

presence of light, into hydrochloric acid and oxygen. 2HClO = 2HCl +

O_{2}

CHLORINE WATER. When a solution of chlorine in water is used as a

germicide the chemical reactions that occur differ materially from those

of hypochlorite solutions. On solution in water, hydration or solvation

probably takes place with the production of heat. Cl_{2}.Aq. = 2,600

calories. Chlorine water is comparatively stable but decomposes under

the influence of light in accordance with the equation Cl_{2} + H_{2}O =

2HCl + O; a similar reaction occurs in the presence of organic matter or

any substance capable of oxidation. Chlorine water contains only minute

traces of hypochlorous acid and there is no evidence that the

endothermic reaction

Cl_{2}.Aq + H_{2}O = HClO.Aq + HCl.Aq

-2600 - 68,460 = -29,930 - 39,315 - 1815

occurs in a measurable degree.

From thermochemical considerations hypochlorous acid and chlorine water

should be about equally active as oxidising agents.

2HClO.Aq = 2HCl + O_{2} + 18,770 calories

2Cl_{2}.Aq + 2H_{2}O = 2HCl + O_{2} + 15,340 calories

2Cl_{2}. + Aq + 2H_{2}O = 2HCl + O_{2} + 20,540 calories

When a solution of chlorine or hypochlorite is added to water as a

germicidal agent, a variety of reactions occur the character of which is

determined by the nature of the mineral and organic matter in the water

and the type of chlorine compound added. The general reactions are of

three types (1) oxidation of the organic matter, (2) direct chlorination

of the organic matter, and (3) a bactericidal action.

In the treatment of waters that contain appreciable amounts of organic

matter almost all the chlorine is consumed in reaction (1) and even with

filter effluents it is probably true that oxidation accounts for the

greater portion of the chlorine consumed. The author has found that a

dosage of 0.02 part per million of available chlorine was more effective

in destroying _B. coli_ in distilled water than 0.40 p.p.m. in a water

absorbing 9.5 p.p.m. of oxygen (30 mins. at 100 deg. C.).

Reaction (1) can be adequately explained by the nascent oxygen

hypothesis and it is this reaction that determines the dosage required

for effective sterilisation. (See Chap. III.)

Very little information is available regarding reaction (2) but there is

little doubt that a direct chlorination of the organic matter does occur

and it is more than probable that these chlorinated derivatives are

largely responsible for the obnoxious tastes and odours produced in some

waters. It has been suggested that these were due to the formation of

chloramines. This view was formerly supported by the author but the

chloramine treatment at Ottawa and other places has demonstrated the

inadequacy of this explanation. It is true that the odour of chloramine

is stronger and more pungent than that of chlorine, but chloramine in

the Ottawa supply, even with doses as high as 0.5 part per million of

available chlorine, has caused no complaints.

The odour of some of the organo-chloro compounds is more penetrating and

obnoxious than those of chlorine and chloramine, and it is quite

possible that some of the higher homologues of chloramine are in this

class. It should be noted, however, that some of the chloro-amido

compounds prepared by Dakin are white, odourless, crystalline

substances.

Practically nothing is known regarding the specific nature of the

mechanism involved in reaction (3). The hypothesis that chlorine, and

chlorine compounds, exert a direct toxic action on the micro-organisms

marks an advance in the science of water treatment but does not indicate

the physiological processes involved. Cross and Bevan[11] have shown

that chloro-amines have a tendency to combine with nitrogenous molecules

and to become fixed on cellulose; it is therefore possible that reaction

is a cytolytic one in which the chlorine attacks and partially or wholly

destroys the membranous envelope of the organisms. A portion of the

chlorine or chlorine-compound may also penetrate the membrane and

produce changes that result in the death of the organism.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

[1] Fischer and Proskauer, Rev. d'Hyg., 1884, 6, 515.

[2] Warouzoff, Winogradoff, and Kolessnikoff. Russkaia medicina, 1886,

Nos. 3 and 32.

[3] Race. Jour. Amer. Water Works Assoc., 1918, 5, 63.

[4] Griffen and Hedallen. Jour. Soc. Chem. Ind., 1915, 34, 530.

[5] Norton and Hsu. Jour. Inf. Dis., 1916, 18, 180.

[6] Rideal, S. Jour. Roy. San. Inst., 1910, 31, 33.

[7] Dakin, Cohen, Duafresne, and Kenyon. Proc. Roy. Soc., 1916, 89B,

232.

[8] Noyes and Lyon. Jour. Amer. Chem. Soc., 1901, 23, 460.

[9] Bray and Dowell. Jour. Amer. Chem. Soc., 1917, 39, 905.

[10] Jakowkin. Zeit. f. Phys. Chim., 1899, 19, 613.

[11] Cross and Bevan. Jour. Soc. Chem. Ind., 1898, 28, 260.

[12] Breteau. Jour. Pharm. Chim., 1915, 12, 248.

Chlorination of Water · 第 2 / 7 章