CHAPTER XII.

THE TIMES AND CAREER OF MICHAEL THE BRAVE.

The state of society--Greater and lesser boyards--Taxation and

oppression of the peasantry--Immorality of the boyards--The

priesthood--Officers of State--Classes of peasantry--Rise of the

towns--The soldiery--Aggressions of Turks and Tartars--Michael the

Brave--His rise to power--Accession to the throne

(1594)--Remonstrances with the Porte--Alliance with Hungary and

Poland--Massacre of the Turks--Anecdote--Conspiracy against Michael

quelled--The Turks attacked and routed on the Danube--Invasion of

Wallachia by Achmed Pasha--His defeat--Michael swears fealty to

Sigismund of Transylvania--Second Turkish invasion by Sinan

Pasha--Determined stand of Michael at Giurgevo--Retreat of Michael

and battle of Kalugereni--Defeat of Sinan--Retreat of

Michael--Occupation of Wallachia by Sinan--Michael and his allies

take the offensive--Flight of Sinan and slaughter of the Turks at

Giurgevo--The Turks expelled--Peace in Wallachia--Intrigues of

Michael--Accession of Andreas Bathori--Invasion and conquest of

Transylvania by Michael--His triumph--Michael, Prince of

Transylvania--Further intrigues--Invasion and conquest of

Moldavia--Michael in the zenith of his power--Feud with the

nobles--Michael encounters them at Miriszlo--Their Austrian ally,

General Basta--Defeat and flight of Michael--Anecdote--Continued

misfortunes of Michael--Petitions the Emperor--Is permitted to

visit him--Recall of Sigismund Bathori--Michael reinstated by the

Emperor--Invades Transylvania in alliance with Basta--Defeat of the

nobles at Gorozlo--Quarrels of the victorious generals--Basta

determines to remove Michael--Employs a Walloon officer to

assassinate him--Michael murdered in his tent (1601)--Flight of his

boyards--The German Court refuses to reward Basta's treachery.

I.

As the state of the northern Danubian territories before the foundation

of the Principalities has been compared by us to the present condition

of what is called Independent Tartary, and at a subsequent period to

that of the early Saxons, so in the reign of Michael the Brave

(1593-1601 A.D.) the state of society resembled that of England

under the Norman kings; indeed, there is a remarkably interesting

agreement in some of its phases. As in England there were greater and

lessor barons, so in Moldo-Wallachia there were greater and lesser

boyards. These seem to have possessed all the rapacity of our robber

barons, with but little of their _reputed_ chivalry. They oppressed the

peasantry, who since the time of Vlad the Impaler were to a large extent

serfs, with unbearable taxes, and endeavoured on all occasions to shift

the burdens of the State upon those whose shoulders were the least able

to bear them. One of these imposts was the poll-tax, similar to that

which gave rise to Wat. Tyler's riots in the time of Richard II., but

which, strange to say, still survives in Roumania, to the

dissatisfaction of all her right-minded citizens.

[Illustration: EQUESTRIAN STATUE MICHAEL THE BRAVE AT BUCAREST.

(FROM A PHOTOGRAPH BY FRANZ DUSCHEK.)]

Besides the poll-tax, there was the 'Standard gift' (Poklon), which was

levied at the installation of the Voivode; the Easter present; the extra

tax (_ajutorita_), which was raised when the other taxes ran short.

Moreover, there were taxes in kind on malt, salt, fish, cattle, and

horses, payable to the prince. The landlord (boyard) was entitled to

land and pasturage tax, the tenth of the earth's productions, feudal

service, bee, pig, and sheep taxes, and in addition to these a rate was

levied upon bees, pigs, tobacco, wine, and sheep, for the benefit of the

prince.[138] Whilst these imposts and the extraordinary levies and

ravages of war often reduced the whole of the peasantry to the most

abject poverty, bordering on starvation, the boyards lived in

comparative ease, and led a life of immorality and self-indulgence.

Concubinage widely prevailed, and many boyards had, besides their

legitimate wife, ten or a dozen mistresses. They appear to have been

gradually growing in influence, and the greater boyards filled all the

chief offices of State as well as the leading military posts in the

districts. Personal distinctions existed also, the leading boyards being

allowed to wear long beards, a practice which was forbidden to the

lesser boyards.

Besides the boyards and their serfs there was hardly any native

population worth speaking of, and no middle class whatever; all trade

being in the hands of Greeks, Jews, and Armenians. There was, however, a

priesthood, who were as ignorant as the peasantry; indeed many of them

followed both occupations, the only exceptions being the metropolitan

and the higher clerics, who possessed considerable influence there as

elsewhere in the middle ages. The power of the prince had no definite

limits, and, with the exception of the counteracting influence of the

boyards, it was practically absolute. There was a council of twelve

boyards, whose signatures along with that of the prince were visually

appended to all important State documents.

In the time of Stephen (some writers say, at an earlier period), the

various offices of State were established, which were maintained down to

a recent date, both in Wallachia and Moldavia; and as it is impossible

for the reader to interest himself in any question bearing upon the past

history of the country without finding some mention made of one or other

of them, it may be useful here to enumerate a few of their titles.

1. The Ban of Craiova was Viceroy of Little Wallachia, and his authority

reached back, in all probability, to the foundation of the principality.

2. The Vel-Vornic, or Minister of the Interior, was Governor of the

Carpathians and of the neighbouring districts. 3. The Great Vornic was

governor of the lowlands. 4. The Logothet, or Chancellor, was Minister

of Justice. 5. The Great Spathar was Minister of War. 6. The Great

Vestiar, Treasurer and Master of the Robes. 7. The Great Postelnik,

Master of the Post. 8. The Paharnic, chief butler and cup-bearer (this

was a title of Hungarian origin). 9. The Great Stolnik, chief cook. 10.

The Great Comis, Master of the Horse. 11. The Aga, Chief of Police. 12.

Great Pitar, Inspector of Commissariat. 13. Serdar, general of infantry

of three districts (3,000 men). In Moldavia the Spathar was called the

Hettman; in both principalities there were minor offices, and in

Stephen's time the first six only formed the Council of Ministers.[139]

Although, as we have said, the peasantry were chiefly serfs, there were

differences in their condition. The chief body were called Scutelnici,

and the peasantry generally were divided into two classes, those who

possessed land of their own, and those who worked on the estates of the

prince, the boyards, or the monasteries. Part of the latter were free to

move about in search of employment, and the rest were absolutely serfs

attached to the soil; the term of service in every case was fixed at

forty-eight days in the year. The towns were growing in importance, the

capital being Tirgovistea, but Bucarest (to which place Constantine

Brancovano transferred his capital about a century later) was already an

important place, owing chiefly to its situation. Another town or large

village was Curtea d'Ardges. But the Wallachian Voivodes shifted their

'capital' as it suited their pleasure, and the removal in those days was

probably not a very onerous undertaking. It appears that Vlad Dracul

(the Devil) preferred Tirgovistea, whilst another Voivode, Michna,

favoured Ardges.[140] Other towns of note Craiova, Ploiesti, Buzeu, and

two or three ports on the Danube. In Moldavia, Iasi, Suceava, and Roman

were the chief towns. The government of the towns was carried on by a

burgomaster, or mayor, a prefect, and a council of twelve citizens.

The army was very heterogeneous both as regarded its nationalities and

its armament. It was then, or perhaps at a somewhat later period,

divided into three sections, the regular army,[141] the militia, and the

landsturm, the last-named being without pay and only called out in times

of great danger, and it consisted mainly of the servants and slaves of

the boyards. The arms of the regular soldiers were originally, as in

this country, bows and arrows and lances, but in Michael's time there

were already musketeers and primitive artillery. Besides the native

soldiery there were mercenaries, namely, Hungarians, Szeklers, Poles,

Cossacks, Servians, Bulgarians, Albanians, cavalry as well as infantry.

The whole country was at that time divided into military districts

answering to the present Judeztu or departments, each district being

under the control of a captain who united military, administrative, and

judicial power in his own person. The names of most of the districts

remain unchanged to the present day.

To this account of the state of Moldo-Wallachia it is only necessary to

add that in time of war, and that was the normal condition, the people

were subjected to terrible privations. When an army advanced, the

peasantry were laid under contributions for the troops; when it fled

before the enemy, everything was burned or destroyed in its retreat, so

that the pursuing force might be checked for want of supplies.

Schools for the people there were none, and all the knowledge that

existed was confined within the walls of the monasteries, which were,

however, numerous and well endowed. At no period of its history was

Wallachia in such a deplorable condition as when Michael ascended the

throne. Besides possessing the suzerainty of the principality the Turks

completely occupied the whole southern bank of the Danube, along with

some posts and what is known as Temesvar, on the northern side. The

Transylvanian slopes of the Carpathians and the country beyond were a

fief of the German, or, as it was called, the Roman Empire, over which

at that time Rudolph II. reigned, whilst the territory north of Moldavia

formed part of Poland. But although Wallachia was nominally autonomous,

and was allowed to choose its own rulers, it was in reality an oppressed

province of Turkey. The treaties had been completely set at defiance.

Mosques had been erected and houses built by Turkish residents, contrary

to the stipulations of the Treaty of Nicopolis, with the connivance of

the voivodes, who, as we have said, were raised up and deposed as it

suited the greed or policy of the Porte. Their fortresses and garrisons

on the Danube served as centres from which the Ottomans made raids into

Wallachian territory, spreading desolation far and wide, and in addition

to this scourge the suffering inhabitants had from time to time hostile

visits from the Tartars. Hordes of these savages were in alliance with

the Turks against Hungary, and it was not unusual for them to deviate

from their route, fall into the plains of Wallachia, and renew the

scenes of rapine and outrage which had characterised the passage of the

Eastern barbarians.

Michael, who was probably the posthumous son of a former voivode of

Wallachia called Petraschko, was born about the year 1558, and in 1583

he married the widow of a boyard, by whom he had at least one, if not

two sons, and a daughter. He occupied several honourable positions in

the State, and was Ban of Craiova before he ascended the throne of

Wallachia. This step he accomplished through intrigues at Constantinople

with the aid of his father-in-law, whereby he succeeded in deposing his

predecessor Alexander. Some marvellous tales are told concerning the

hairbreadth escapes of Michael in his struggles for the ascendency, one

being that, when he was captured by Alexander and ordered for execution,

the headsman was so terrified at the majesty of his countenance that he

dropped the axe and fled, and no one else was to be found willing to

undertake the odious duty. Be that as it may, he succeeded eventually in

removing his rival, and mounted the throne of Wallachia in 1593. For

some time after his accession Michael addressed remonstrances to his

suzerain at Constantinople concerning the lawless proceedings of the

Turkish and Tartar soldiery, but, finding these to be of no avail, he

sought the alliance of Sigismund, Prince of Siebenbuergen[142]

(Transylvania), and Aaron, Voivode of Moldavia, and determined to rid

his country of the oppressors. Aaron of Moldavia, it should be added,

was a feeble prince, who would not have joined Michael but for the

circumstance that, having been attacked and defeated by the Poles, he

was compelled to seek refuge at Michael's court. After the alliance

between the three princes was completed the first blow was struck for

independence, and on November 12 or 13, 1594, all Turks who were found

in Bucarest or Jassy were slaughtered without mercy. Michael is said to

have invited a large number of true believers, who were pressing for the

settlement of unlawful claims, to meet him in a khan in Bucarest, and

when they were assembled he had them all put to the sword, and this was

the signal for a massacre throughout the Principalities. A few Turks

escaped through the humanity or friendship of private individuals, and

one instance of this is specially recorded. The Cadi of Giurgevo, who

happened to be at Bucarest, was walking out on the morning of November

13, when he was stopped by a Wallachian friend who said,

'Ali-Gian-Hogea, how many years have I eaten of thy bread and salt?'

'About twenty years,' answered the Turk. 'Well, then,' said his friend,

'out of gratitude I will give thee a word of counsel.' 'Speak,' said

Ali. 'Do not stay in this city until three or four o'clock; neither

remain in Giurgevo, but hasten thee as speedily as possible to Rustchuk'

(on the opposite bank of the Danube). 'But wherefore?' enquired the

Turk. The Wallachian walked away, but, turning round and seeing his

friend still undecided, he called out: 'Forget not what I have told

thee!' Wandering on in the city, the Turk could not help noticing

greater activity than usual in the streets; suspecting mischief, but

without saying a word to any person, he ordered his horses to be

harnessed and fled to Giurgevo. The interior of Wallachia having been

thus cleared of the Turks, Michael proceeded to attack their positions

on the Danube. First he stormed Giurgevo and compelled the Turks to

leave it, some crossing over the Danube, and others taking refuge in the

fortress which was situated on an island in the river; but this latter

he was unable to capture, as troops, ammunition, and provisions were

sent into it from the Bulgarian side. Content, therefore, with his

victory, he retired to Bucarest.

[Footnote 138: Teutschlaender, from whose excellent little treatise,

_Michael der Tapfere_ (Wien, C. Graeser, 1879), these details are taken,

mentions many customs as existing in the time of Michael which were in

all probability only introduced at a later period. The tobacco-tax is

clearly one of them.]

[Footnote 139: The reader will find full accounts of the officials and

their various duties, as well as a description of the investiture of the

princes, in Raicevich, p. 62. In Wilkinson, p. 55, he will find that in

his day there had been a great multiplication of the offices; there were

second and third Logothets, second and third Vestiars, &c.]

[Footnote 140: Reissenberger, p. 39, in part quoting Engel.]

[Footnote 141: Some modern Roumanian historians affirm that Mircea

already had a regular army, but Roesler and others treat the assertion

with ridicule. As to Michael, the reader will judge for himself whether

or not it would have been possible to accomplish what he did without a

disciplined force.]

[Footnote 142: Siebenbuergen was so called from seven forts erected

there.]

II.

Shortly afterwards a conspiracy against Michael was set on foot by

adherents of the Turks, and under the pretence of desiring simply to

march through the country, a Turkish Emir, with two thousand men,

entered Bucarest. Michael, who know of the conspiracy, made a pretence

of acquiescence in this movement, but shortly afterwards withdrew

quietly to the camp of the allies, and returning with a sufficient force

surrounded the house of the chief conspirator, in which the Emir and his

escort were quartered, and put them to the sword. The fury of his troops

was unbridled, and no quarter was given, the last of the enemy being

put to death. But Michael did not stop here. In order to protect

Wallachia from Turkish inroads, he determined to clear both banks of the

Danube of their garrisons. With this view he sent the noted and

successful Transylvanian general, Albert Kiraly, with a sufficient

force, who took, plundered, and burned the Turkish town at the mouth of

the Jalomitza, where it falls into the Danube. The fortress, however, he

was obliged to leave in the hands of the Turks. Michael, following with

the remainder of the army, crossed the river itself and besieged

Oroschik (now Hirschova). This place was strongly reinforced by the

Turks, but after an obstinate battle, which was fought partly on the

frozen waters of the Danube, the allies were victorious, and retired

across the river with an immense booty.

Shortly afterwards he moved up the river to Silistria, where he a second

time encountered the Turks, gained a victory, and reduced the place to

ashes. These victories of Michael struck terror into the rulers at

Constantinople, and an Ottoman army, under Achmed Pasha, was sent to

Rustchuk, whilst the Khan of the Crimea, an ally of the Turks, was

ordered to enter Wallachia from the east, the Porte hoping by these

vigorous measures to reduce its rebellious vassal to submission. The

Turks did not, however, know of what material Michael was made. Dividing

his army into two parts, he succeeded, by the rapidity of his movements,

not only in keeping the allies asunder, but in completely routing both.

The Tartars were twice defeated, and their fugitives spread terror

amongst the Ottoman forces. Michael next gave the Turks battle at

Rustchuk with his whole force, defeated and dispersed them, and slew

their general. After these exploits he returned in triumph and with

great booty to Bucarest.

Without, however, resting long under his laurels, he once more divided

his army into several detachments, which, under different generals,

marched once more to the Danube, the result being that the allied

princes of Wallachia and Moldavia were soon able to report to Prince

Sigismund that both banks of the Danube eastward to the Black Sea had

been swept clear of the Ottoman forces.

III.

But Michael's troubles were far from terminated by these victories.

Before securing the co-operation of the Prince of Siebenbuergen, he had,

with a duplicity which characterised his whole career, agreed to

acknowledge Sigismund as his suzerain, his object being to free himself

from Turkish rule and then assume independent power. But the

Transylvanians were not to be so easily disposed of, and after the

victories over the Turks they in their turn demanded homage from the two

Voivodes, and backed their claim by an irresistible force. The Voivode

of Moldavia was seized and imprisoned, and Michael, deeming prudence the

better part of valour, submitted to the terms which were dictated to

him. These were in appearance worse even than the Turkish

'capitulations,' but, as they were never kept, it is unnecessary to

mention them. Sigismund assumed the title 'By the grace of God, Prince

of Siebenbuergen, of Moldavia and Wallachia, and of the Holy Roman

Empire, &c.' (he in his turn being the vassal of the German Emperor),

whilst Michael was denied the claim to divine right, was restricted in

his princely powers, and was addressed as 'Dominus Michael Voivoda regni

nostri Transalpinensis.' He was not permitted to employ the national

seal, but was allowed the use of red wax.

Perhaps it was well for Michael that he submitted to these humiliating

conditions at the hands of his ally, or his reign might have been even

shorter than it was, for the Turk was again at his gates with an

overwhelming army. The Sultan Murad III. was dead, January 1595, and was

succeeded by Mahommed III.; nineteen brothers, we are told, having been

slaughtered to obviate dissensions, a custom which is still followed, as

the reader is doubtless aware, in certain oriental realms. Shortly after

his accession, the Porte again proceeded to assume the sovereignty of

the Principalities, and an army variously estimated from 100,000 to

180,000 men, under Sinan Pasha, was concentrated at Rustchuk to take

possession of the provinces. Michael was at the time able to collect

only 8,000 men, for the Transylvanian troops had been withdrawn, but his

encounter with the overwhelming Turkish force arrayed against him on

this occasion undoubtedly presents the most brilliant phase of his

remarkable career. Marching rapidly to Giurgevo with his handful of men,

he managed to detain the Turkish army for weeks on the south side of the

Danube, destroying their bridges and preventing them from crossing the

river. Turned at length by a Turkish detachment, which had succeeded in

crossing at a point above Giurgevo, he was compelled to withdraw to a

village about halfway towards Bucarest. His little army had been

strengthened by an accession of Transylvanian and Moldavian troops, the

former under brave Albert Kiraly, but even then it barely numbered

16,000, whilst the army of Sinan Pasha must have been at least six times

as strong. Kalugereni, the village at which this stand was made, is

still to be found on the maps, on the line of railway from Giurgevo to

Bucarest; and it only differed from Thermopylae in the fact that the

enemy was not alone checked in his career, but for the time the little

army of Roumanians and their allies were completely victorious.

Nothing could have exceeded the astonishment of Sinan Pasha when he

found Michael ready to give him battle with his handful of patriots; but

as he proceeded to make his dispositions for the onslaught, he found

that his adversary possessed in his favourable position much to

compensate him for his inferior numbers. The nature of the ground was

such that Sinan could not employ the whole, nor even the major part, of

his forces, and Michael and his allies were protected by a morass and

river, which rendered it necessary for the Turks to concentrate their

whole attack upon a single road and bridge crossing the latter. At this

bridge the battle was practically fought. Michael and his forces for a

long time sustained the attack of the Ottomans, who had posted their

guns so as to commit havoc in the ranks of the allies, until these,

fighting hand to hand, were obliged to retreat. The Turks followed and

had made sure of their victory, when Albert Kiraly succeeded in bringing

two guns into a favourable position, and by a flank fire threw the enemy

into confusion. Of this circumstance Michael availed himself once more

to renew the attack, this time with the most happy results. The enemy

retreated in disorder over the bridge, and by the furious onslaught of

the allies his hosts were driven helter-skelter into the morass. On the

one hand Michael is said to have performed prodigies of valour, whilst

on the other Sinan Pasha, who fought with equal bravery, was unhorsed

and thrown into the bog, from which he only escaped with his life

through the fidelity of one of his followers, who was afterwards known

as the 'Marsher.' Michael recovered his own guns, which had been

captured early in the fight, as well as many of the enemy's, along with

a great booty comprising many Turkish standards, and including the

sacred standard of Mohammed, which was believed to be invincible. Thus

ended a struggle of which to this day Roumanians are proud, and which

they associate with the memory of their greatest hero. This battle was

fought and won at some indefinite date between August 13 and 26, 1595.

The rest of the campaign may be dismissed in a few sentences.

That Michael with his small force could draw no advantage from his

victory may be readily imagined; and, a council of war being held during

the night, a retreat was decided upon. Passing rapidly through Bucarest,

which was sacked by the Transylvanian troops in order that the Turks

might not profit by its treasures, the allies retired to Tirgovistea,

followed by the inhabitants on their route; and after a few days' rest

they proceeded to a village at the foot of the Carpathians to await

succour from Siebenbuergen. The Turkish commander, meanwhile, instead of

following them promptly, entered Bucarest at leisure, where he divided

his army into numerous detachments, to take possession of various parts

of the country and garrison fortresses, and spent his time in turning

churches into mosques and substituting the crescent for the cross. Then

he marched on, took possession of Tirgovistea, and sent a large force

to occupy Braila.

Meanwhile Sigismund had collected a powerful and well-disciplined army,

consisting of imperial troops and Transylvanians, and numbering 20,000

horse and 30,000 foot with 53 guns. With these he crossed the

Carpathians, and, joining Michael and Albert Kiraly, he resumed the

offensive against the Turks, driving them before him wherever he

encountered them. Sinan took fright, and retired to Bucarest.

Tirgovistea was recovered by the allies after three days' fighting, and

many guns were captured. Sinan continued to retire before the advancing

foe. Having set fire to the city and burned many churches, he hastily

withdrew to Giurgevo; and, thinking that the allies would enter

Bucarest, he is said to have left it mined ready for explosion. In this,

however, he was mistaken. Sigismund and Michael passed by Bucarest and

pursued him in all haste, arriving at Giurgevo whilst the Turkish army

was still crossing the river. Sinan had managed to reach the Bulgarian

side with a portion of his troops, but the rearguard was still at

Giurgevo, and a fight ensued in which the greater part of the Turkish

force was cut to pieces either on land or in their attempt to traverse

the stream. The Danube was reddened with the blood; 5,000 Turks are said

to have fallen, and 4,000 to 5,000 Christians to have been liberated

from their chains. The whole campaign is said to have cost the Turks

30,000 men and 150 large and small guns.

IV.

Having, with the aid of his allies, effectually freed his country from

external enemies, Michael had now a brief space of time for improving

its internal condition, for it is hardly necessary to say that these

desolating wars had reduced it to the very lowest stage of misery.

Fields were tilled, cattle imported from Transylvania, seed corn

distributed amongst the peasantry, and soon the face of the land assumed

a smiling aspect, and new towns and villages sprang from the ruins of

the old. Minor wars he had with the Tartars, and conspiracies were

formed against him and quelled. He was even accused of treachery against

his suzerain, whom, however, he managed to satisfy during a visit to

Weissenburg; and well would it have been for Michael and his country if

his ambition had not prompted him to over-estimate his powers, and if he

had been content to reign in peace over his own principality. But this

was not his policy. His victories had given him a high rank amongst the

powers of the Orient; and the changes which were taking place brought

him into communication with one and another, and favoured a scheme of

aggrandisement which, though it was for a time successful, eventuated in

his downfall and death.

Sigismund Bathori, weary of government, had abdicated in favour of his

brother, the Cardinal Andreas, with whom Michael had nothing in common,

and then it was (if not previously) that the latter began to nurse the

design of becoming the independent ruler over what had been ancient

Dacia, namely, Wallachia, Moldavia, and Siebenbuergen. With this view he

commenced negotiations with the Porte, which were eagerly welcomed; and

he also approached the German emperor, from whom he needed money to pay

his mercenary troops. Indeed, for the purpose of accomplishing his ends,

he at one and the same time did homage and acknowledged himself the

vassal of both powers. For a long time he temporised and contented

himself with strengthening and drilling his forces. At length taking

advantage of unfriendly relations which subsisted between Andreas

Bathori and the emperor, from whom he had succeeded in obtaining a

subsidy on the plea that he required it for his operations against the

Turks, who constantly threatened the Empire, Michael hastily assembled

his forces, and, against the warnings and wishes of his wife and some of

his more discreet counsellors, he crossed the Boza Pass in the

Carpathians in 1599, and proceeded to overrun Siebenbuergen, as he

professed, in the name and interests of his suzerain, the German

emperor.

After striking terror into the inhabitants of Transylvania by the

excesses of his troops, Michael's first step of any consequence on

entering the country was to appear before Kronstadt with his army and

demand its surrender. This was granted, and Michael deemed it politic

not to enter the city, but to march forward and get possession of other

towns, which yielded to him one after the other in rapid succession.

Andreas Bathori was staggered and perplexed by this sudden inroad into

his dominions, but when he became fully alive to the danger the whole

country was roused by the carrying round of the 'bloody sword.' He also

sent emissaries to induce Michael to return to his own country, but the

latter kept these in confinement until the conclusion of the campaign.

What made the matter more serious for Andreas was that a vast number of

discontented inhabitants and freebooters, lusting after plunder, had

joined the army of Michael, and had swelled it to the number of 25,000

men. A council of war was hastily called by Andreas, and after

considerable delay the Transylvanian army was collected at Hermanstadt.

Michael, not expecting serious opposition so soon, had recourse to

stratagem in order to gain time and deceive his enemy. To his shame be

it said that he sent emissaries to Andreas who were instructed to

represent the whole proceeding as an unfortunate mistake, and to express

Michael's regret at the excesses of his troops. All he wished, he said,

was a free passage through Siebenbuergen into Hungary, where he desired

to join his forces with those of the Empire against the Turks. And when

the cardinal sent him word that he must return to Wallachia with his

forces before he could consider their old friendship restored, Michael

carried his duplicity so far as to conclude a truce with the emissaries

and make a proposal to exchange hostages. The negotiations were,

however, in all probability insincere on both sides; and, after further

delay, the emissaries returned to their respective camps, and the

opposing armies met in hostile array upon a plain between Hermanstadt

and Schellenberg. Here each prince addressed his troops previous to the

encounter. Cardinal Andreas, divested of his clerical robes and fully

equipped and mounted, denounced Michael in the bitterest terms. His

brethren, he said, still herded sheep and pigs in Wallachia. He had

associated himself with robbers and with a miscellaneous rabble

collected from all parts to ruin the country. 'Be not afraid,' he added,

'of this nation of Sclaves, who, from time immemorial, have been

conquered subjects of the Hungarians, and who should be punished rather

with rods and blows than with the sword.' Thus, and much more in the

same strain, spake Andreas. Michael, on the other hand, spoke of his

enemy with contemptuous jocularity, as a mounted and perjured priest who

had allied himself with the Turks, the enemies of Christendom, whilst he

himself claimed to represent fidelity to Christianity and the Empire.

Moreover, he held out to his troops tho prospect of great booty if they

were victorious.

We shall not attempt to describe the engagement which followed. At the

very outset it declared itself to some extent in Michael's favour

through the desertion of one of the most influential leaders in

Andreas's army. It was chiefly a series of encounters between isolated

detachments of troops, and in many cases not only were men of the same

nation arrayed against each other, but the opposing forces were under

the leadership of near relatives. The first to yield, after a fierce and

protracted contest, was Andreas, who fled from the field believing the

battle to be lost. His brave generals, however, rallied his men, and to

a great extent retrieved the fortunes of the day. In fact they fought so

successfully that a portion of the Wallachian army, where Michael

himself was in command, took to flight, and for a time dragged its

leader along with it. The cowardice of Andreas prevented the

Transylvanian leaders from taking advantage of this turn in their

favour; and Michael, seeing that all was not lost, made strenuous

efforts to rally his troops. By threats, blows, and angry exclamations,

he at length succeeded in arresting the stampede, but it was not until

he had with his own sword run two fugitive captains through the body

that he was once more successful in leading his followers into the

field, and this time in effectually routing the enemy. This end was

facilitated by an event similar to the one which commenced the fight.

The Poles in Transylvanian service, seeing their leader flee, and

regarding his cause as lost, deserted in a body in order that they might

not lose their share of the booty.

This battle, which is called by some the battle of Schellenberg, and by

others of Hermanstadt, laid Transylvania at the feet of Michael.

Hermanstadt would have opened its gates to him, but instead of entering

it he marched onwards, and on November 1, 1599, he entered the capital,

Weissenburg, in triumph. On that occasion the magnificence of his

apparel and surroundings scarcely seems to have been consistent with his

reputation as a hardy warrior. We read of a white silk mantle

embroidered with gold lace; of buttons of precious stones; of a girdle,

in which was carried a scimetar rich in gold and rubies; and of his wife

and children being in similar state. One other feature is worthy of

mention. With booming of cannon, tolling of bells, sound of fife and

drum, and tramp of richly-caparisoned steeds was associated the

Wallachian national music performed by gipsies (Laoutari), an incident

which enables one who has even to-day heard their wild music to picture

to himself a vivid representation of the scene.

V.

Michael now assumed the direction of affairs in Transylvania,

notwithstanding that the German general, Basta, who had hoped to acquire

the government for himself, was present with an army to control his

action. Soon he heard of the capture and murder of Andreas Bathori, on

whose head he had set a price, by the peasantry of the mountains; and,

calling an assembly of the notables, he succeeded in securing their

adhesion to his viceroyalty. After long-protracted negotiations the

emperor, seeing that Michael was firmly installed in his government with

the consent of the Assembly of States, and finding him willing to submit

as a vassal of the German crown, accepted the situation, and permitted

him to do homage. This was done with great reluctance and in spite of

Papal remonstrances, as the murder of Cardinal Bathori had caused great

bitterness against Michael at Rome. As soon as the latter felt or deemed

his position in Siebenbuergen secure, he turned his arms against

Moldavia, with a view to depose Jeremiah Mogila, the reigning voivode,

and complete his incorporation of that country with the two over which

he already ruled. The manoeuvres of Michael were questionable previous

to his contest with Andreas; but now he excelled himself. In order to

obtain his ends, he threatened the emperor with an alliance with the

Turks, unless he gave him further supplies of money. The Porte he

pacified by receiving its envoys and doing homage. To the Pope he turned

for support against the infidel, but his only response was that Michael

should first adopt the true faith--he being, of course, a member of the

schismatic Greek Church; and just before entering Moldavia with his army

he had the effrontery, in order to throw Mogila off his guard, to

propose a marriage between his daughter and Mogila's son. Finally, in

order to secure the obedience of his subjects in Siebenbuergen during his

absence in Moldavia, he sent a large number of Transylvanian nobles to

his son in Wallachia, to be detained there as hostages until he had

accomplished his ends.

The King of Poland, who was in alliance with Moldavia, was aware of

Michael's schemes, and appealed to the emperor to check them; but

Michael, little heeding, collected a heterogeneous army, and in May,

A.D. 1600, he commenced his march into Moldavia, announcing it

as his intention to avenge the death of the late Voivode Stephen, who

had been murdered by Jeremiah Mogila. His passage across the Carpathians

was beset with difficulties, his army being often almost bare of

supplies; but, once in Moldavia, all yielded before his arms. Jeremiah

was at a wedding in fancied security, and had barely time to collect a

small army when Michael was upon him. A battle was fought near the

capital Suczava, which decided the fate of the principality. A great

part of Jeremiah's army deserted to Michael, who defeated his enemy

without difficulty, and obtained possession of Suczava. After remaining

for a short time in Moldavia, Jeremiah escaped to Poland, and succeeded

in raising the Poles in his support. These, however, were so terrified

at the successes of Michael's arms that they contented themselves with

sending an army to the frontier, and there standing on the defensive.

Michael won over the Moldavians by exempting them from taxation, and,

having placed the government in the hands of a military commission, he

turned his face towards Transylvania, and re-entered Weissenburg in

triumph, within two months of the day on which he had departed on his

mission of conquest.

VI.

The authority of Michael was readily recognised by the Transylvanian

States General, and with great misgiving by the Emperor Rudolph. He was

now at the pinnacle of his fame, styling himself, modestly enough,

Viceroy, but acting with the authority of a despotic ruler. Gold and

silver medals were struck in his honour, some of which are extant;

emissaries waited upon him from the German and other courts, and were

received in royal state.

From his effigy upon these medals, and from a portrait of him which was

painted subsequently, he appears to have been a man of striking presence

and somewhat stern aspect. His face was characterised by an aquiline

nose, a beard and moustache, and it is said to have been full of

expression.

Would that we could leave him at this triumphant stage of his career;

but that is impossible, for rapid and remarkable as was his ascent, his

fall and ruin were still more precipitate. Scarcely was he installed in

his threefold authority when his troubles commenced. He had never been

heartily accepted by his nobles, many of whom were ambitious and

self-seeking, and considered him in the light of a usurper. The nation

itself was composed of antagonistic races, Szeklers, Saxons, Hungarians,

&c., and where he pleased one race he displeased the other. The Poles,

too, were only watching their opportunity to disturb his government in

Moldavia. A rising at home, which Michael endeavoured to quell by the

execution of some of the leaders, soon became very formidable, and the

nobles assembled a considerable army of retainers and encamped at

Thorda. Michael endeavoured by various stratagems to get them into his

power, but failed to do so. General Basta, who was eager to be revenged

upon him for having kept him out of the viceroyalty of Siebenbuergen,

joined the Transylvanian army; and Michael, finding all his efforts at

pacification unavailing, at length encountered General Basta and the

nobles at Miriszlo, a village which the reader will still find marked on

the railway, between Karlsburg and Klausenburg. The position of Michael

was a very strong one, and, had he awaited the attack of his enemies,

the probability is that he would again have been victorious. But in

Basta he had a wily adversary. Finding it impossible to attack Michael

where he was encamped, he feigned a retreat, whereupon Michael, asking

contemptuously of his generals 'whither the Italian hound was fleeing,'

allowed his army to follow in disorderly pursuit. They were, however,

soon checked, and Michael was then obliged to give battle under far less

favourable conditions. His army was more numerous than that of his

enemy; but not only was the latter composed of seasoned troops, but it

was far better officered. The encounter was a fierce one, and it was

decided against Michael by a clever manoeuvre of Basta. One of his

generals noticed that Michael's artillery, which was so posted as to

harass the army of the allies, might be seized by a flank movement. He

sent three hundred musketeers, who succeeded in capturing the guns and

turning them upon Michael's forces. All was soon lost, and after vain

attempts to rally his men he at length yielded to the solicitations of

his officers and prepared to fly. His conduct on this occasion is

characteristic of the man. 'So he ordered the national flag to be

brought, which was made of white silk, and bore a device consisting of a

raven with a red cross in its beak upon a green field. This was torn

from the staff, and Michael hid it in his bosom. The officers followed

his example with the remaining ensigns. Then he gave spurs to his

horse, and with loosened rein, accompanied by his officers and some

Polish and other cavalry, took to flight. Had he waited a few minutes

longer, he would surely have been made prisoner.'[143] With the enemy at

his heels Michael reached the banks of the Naros river, and instead of

allowing himself to be ferried across he sprang into the waves on

horseback, and his faithful horse, which was of Turkish breed, landed

him safely on the other side. Here, filled with gratitude and affection

for the animal, and knowing that it was unable to carry him further, he

patted it on the neck, stroked its mane, kissed it, and let it run free

into the fields. To follow Michael's adventures after this terrible

defeat would be impossible. At first he took refuge in the Carpathians,

in the Fogaras mountains as they are called; he then returned, and,

joined by his son, succeeded for a short time in maintaining a foothold

in Transylvania. But threatened by Rudolph and by the Poles, he was glad

to escape into Wallachia.

Here he was again followed by the Poles, and, to complete his

perplexities, the Turks commenced making raids into his country. Once

more he was defeated by the former on the Telega river, near Ploiesti. A

brother of Jeremiah Mogila having been put upon the throne of Wallachia,

Michael found it necessary to take refuge in the Banate of Craiova, his

first seat of government. Then it was that he appealed for protection to

the German emperor, expressing his desire to present himself before him

to plead his own cause. Rudolph granted him a safe-conduct for himself

and a moderate following through Siebenbuergen, and Michael proceeded to

the German Court. Notwithstanding the safe-conduct, however, his journey

was fraught with peril. He was fired upon from castles, was followed by

hostile bands, and was at last only allowed to cross the river Theiss at

Tokay with a hundred men. He reached Vienna in safety on January 12,

1601, and was there prevented from proceeding to Prague, where the

Emperor was, by orders from the imperial court.

Shortly after this, however, the Transylvanian nobles, as faithless to

Rudolph, to whom they had sworn fealty, as they had been to Michael,

recalled Sigismund Bathori, and, without the sanction of the Emperor,

placed him on the throne of Siebenbuergen. Then it was that Rudolph found

it convenient to allow Michael to approach his person. The latter, on

his arrival, presented a petition embodying his defence which might have

been drawn by a special pleader, and which was accepted by the Emperor

as a justification of his proceedings. A complete reconciliation took

place between them, and Michael was formally re-appointed vicegerent of

Transylvania. A sufficiently well-appointed army and a large sum of

money were placed at his disposal, and he was requested to join with his

old enemy, General Basta, in dethroning Sigismund. An apparent

reconciliation took place between the two chiefs, Michael and Basta, and

they marched as allies into Siebenbuergen. Sigismund, finding that his

case with the Emperor was hopeless, and after, it is said, vainly

endeavouring by foul means to prevent the junction of Michael and Basta,

sought and obtained the aid of the Turks and Moldavians. That is to say,

the former would have sent him a contingent of troops had not Michael,

by means of forged letters, purporting to be signed by Sigismund, kept

them at a distance. The opposing forces met at Goroszlo near

Klausenburg, and after a hotly contested battle the Transylvanians were

defeated with terrible slaughter. Hardly, however, was the victory won

when jealousies and recriminations between the two generals followed.

Michael considered himself, as viceroy of Siebenbuergen, called upon to

manage the affairs of the country. Basta, smarting under the

disappointment of having failed to secure the viceroyalty, continued to

assume the position of commander-in-chief of the forces, and not only

interfered with the orders and wishes of Michael, but charged him with

various offences, the chief one being that he was again usurping the

supreme power. Believing that he would be safe in using this charge as a

justification for his acts, and that his removal would pave the way for

his own accession to the viceroyalty, Basta then determined to have

Michael assassinated. Knowing that it was his intention to proceed to

the Carpathians and liberate his family which had been kept there in

confinement, Basta sent a captain with three hundred Walloons to effect

his purpose. This man applied at Michael's tent for permission to

accompany him on his journey, and asked him to obtain the necessary

permission from Basta. Michael assented, whereupon the officer entered

the tent hastily, and, approaching the prince who was reposing,

addressed him as his prisoner. Michael exclaimed that he would not yield

himself alive, but before he could obtain possession of his sword to

defend himself, the officer had ran him through the body with his

halberd.[144] This foul deed was perpetrated between August 17 and

September 1, 1601, and it is said that the assassins struck off his head

and sword-hand with Michael's own sword. Afterwards they tortured and

assassinated his minister, a veteran of eighty years of age, and spread

such terror amongst the troops who had remained faithful to their

murdered prince, that his boyards and their followers took to flight and

sought refuge in Wallachia.

Thus fell Michael the Brave, rash, courageous, false, ambitious,

patriotic, the central figure in the past history of Roumania. Basta

sought to justify his act of treachery in a letter to the Emperor; but

whilst on the one hand the German court dared not quarrel with him in

the then condition of Transylvania, on the other hand they refused to

reward him for a deed of blood which has sent down his name with

execration to posterity.

[Footnote 143: Teutschlaender, p. 201.]

[Footnote 144: According to Vaillant and others there were two officers

each with 300 men, and Michael ran his sword through one of the

officers, but before he could withdraw it the other, called Bory, struck

him down with his halberd.]

Roumania Past and Present · 第 5 / 9 章