26th

This morning we had a thunder-storm in the midst of a heavy fog--a

pure white one like those we call a mist in our country, and bearing

no resemblance to the London pea-soup. The lightning flashing through

it had an odd and beautiful effect. Later the fog rolled _down_ the

mountain to the valleys of lower ranges, leaving only a light mist on

the mountains and peak opposite. Through this the sun shone gently, and

the dense low-looking forests on those distant heights looked as if

lightly powdered. I have been down into the forest again. It is wet,

but fresher and greener than ever, and full of sweet smells. The balsam

when wet, fills the woods with a fragrance that seems to cry aloud of

new vitality. Here and there a great tree has fallen, carrying feebler

ones with it. To-day I discovered that the ground is covered in many

places by a running shrub, that looks like its name, “ground pine.” And

in other places, on rocks, I found a stiff dark-green moss that looked

like a mass of tiny stars. There is so much beauty in these woods one

can make only so many discoveries a day. This morning after the storm,

I went out by the road instead of the trail, and walked down for a

mile or more on those dreadful logs. But that wild magnificent avenue,

dropping and turning abruptly, lured me on. Suddenly I saw straight

ahead for many miles, and at the end of that lofty perspective was a

great mountain, powdered with mist; afterward as I stood watching it,

entranced, darkening to a deep rich blue. And between my avenue and

that far mountain, was only another lofty valley, high above the level,

far from the quick impatient sound of cities. I had not before so fully

understood--and revelled in--our isolation.

It sometimes appalls me to be so far from a doctor or a chemist shop,

but after all what the Adirondacks cannot do for Bertie no man can,

and Agatha has a trunk full of physic. And these _friendly_ mountains

make disaster and heartbreak seem impossible. That adjective is one

of their spirit’s keynotes. The post came very late last night and

I spent the earlier morning hours reading the newspapers to Bertie.

I do not know why Americans should be blamed for their extremes of

wealth and poverty, their proneness, indeed, to rush to extremes of all

sorts, when they have such an example in their climate. Imagine, Polly,

people dying in New York City of the heat, while up here, not three

hundred miles away, and in the same State, we were huddled in furs, a

roaring fire in every room. During the past nine days we have had the

thermometer at 34° and at 86°, we have had sultry thunder-storms on one

day and cold rains on the next. To-day it has been heavy and sullen,

but yesterday was full of splendour, with an exhilaration in the air

that filled Bertie with life and youth once more. His very cheeks

seemed to fill out, and his eyes sparkled as they used to do when his

legs would not carry him to the cricket-field fast enough.

By the way, dear, Mr. Rogers came up yesterday with several other men.

(The families follow in about a week.) They have been fishing since

early morn, regardless of the thunder-storm, but have caught little,

as the fish in these lakes have much to eat, and grow cleverer every

year. Hunter, the lake-keeper, told me of their ill-luck, but when I

expressed sympathy he shrugged his shoulders.

“They like it,” he said; “and them as does’d set and fish all day in a

wash-tub.”

But Mr. Rogers arrived quite early yesterday morning, and spent nearly

all of the day and evening with us. Bertie, who improves steadily in

spite of all climatic vagaries, was delighted to see him, and they

exchanged sporting experiences for several hours.

I have not described Mr. Rogers to you, I think. He is what they

call in this country a “great publisher,” by which I infer is meant

a rich and successful one whose prestige is vastly added to by the

fact that he inherited the “great” business, and is not self-made. A

young man, an author, who sat at our table on the Oceanic, told me

that Mr. Rogers’ firm, and three or four others, set the standard for

American literature, and that any book with his hallmark on it would

be accepted as literature whether the public bought it or not. He has

encouraged, helped to create, as it were, the latter-day distinctive

American literature, which Bertie and I have so rebelled against these

rainy days, and was one of the first to make fashionable the story of

locality and dialect. (I think he ought to be hanged for that.) If you

don’t publish with one of these houses, my informant told me, your

struggle will be a long one. But all that is not very interesting, not

nearly so much so as the man himself He is about fifty-two, I should

think, with that tall thin American figure, which when ill-carried is

so ungainly and provincial, but very distinguished, if a little stiff,

when a man has received the proper training. His face is the coldest

I have ever seen; the eyes are grey, the hair and slight moustache

nondescript, the features and general outlines finely cut, the whole

effect, as I said, cold, and--well, aristocratic. I don’t think I ever

used the word before I came to this country, but it is always popping

off my pen here. It exactly describes Mr. Rogers. He would put a prince

of the blood to the blush; refinement (another great American word),

fastidiousness, correctness, the just not self-conscious superiority

over ordinary mortals, fairly radiate from him in so many cold steady

beams. And his voice is admirably modulated. He is a walking protest

against American provincialism, from its various accents to that

glorious principle that all men are free and equal, which I once read

in the Declaration of Independence. (Dad thought so much of that, and

used to say it was the highest expression of the Ideal, put into the

purest English that ever had been contributed to the literature of

Politics.)

Nevertheless, wherever the source of it may lie, Mr. Rogers is

charming. Perhaps it is because while he looks as if mortal woman could

not fascinate him, he has an air of troubling himself to entertain

her. Occasionally he lets her see that her wiles shake his armour just

a trifle and that he does not tighten it up again, but permits her

glance to penetrate in search of a heart. You don’t find a heart--at

least I speak for myself--but you find all sorts of pleasant spots,

and actually experience a sense of flattery when he laughs heartily

at one of your sallies, or keeps his cold eyes fixed steadily on

yours as you talk, the reflection of a smile in them. I know that he

can be sarcastic and sneering, for I overheard a bout between him

and my author acquaintance of the Oceanic; therefore, we who are

favoured should find a deep satisfaction in basking in the smiles of

this austere and fortunate person. And he certainly can say the most

charming things and make you want to please him in return.

As he went through the University of Yale and has alluded to a

great-grandfather I should know, even if I had not been told, that he

is not a “self-made American”--a variety I am still waiting and wanting

to meet. It would be so much like the real thing.

When I thought Bertie had talked enough I took Mr. Rogers for a walk

in the forest--and, by the way, it was he who called my attention to

the ground pine. He was delightfully solicitous lest I get my feet wet,

or catch cold; and when you have been watching over some one else for

two years, who is, also, quite the centre of all that sort of thing,

you find such solicitude rather fascinating. Mr. Rogers is a widower,

by the way, and I have heard that American women train their husbands

excellently.

We talked about ferns and trees and birds for a time, and I had the

good fortune to see two beautiful birds, one a bright corn-flower

blue from tip to tail, the other a deep orange with black wings. But

neither they nor their comrades lifted their voices for a moment. I

suppose they have sore throats, poor things. But I did not notice the

silence particularly, as we talked all the time. I asked him to tell me

something of the people who were coming, and he replied that they were

his intimate friends for the most part; that, indeed, forming a club to

buy the lake, that they might all be together for six or eight weeks in

summer, had been his suggestion. He and a number of other men come for

a fortnight in the early spring to fish, and some of the families stay

on into September for the deer, but not many, and the lake has rather a

bachelor appearance after the last of August.

“I’d like you to define your set,” I said, rather bluntly. “I infer

you would not condescend to belong to the fashionable frivolous

world, and--well--you are not my idea of a Bohemian, nor yet exactly

middle-class--I mean what I imagine the American middle-class to be.”

“No,” he said, smiling, “we are not fashionable in the ‘400’ meaning

of the word, nor are we Bohemians, nor yet middle-class. The set to

which I belong, if you must have all the facts--and you have only to

command me for all the facts on any subject that I understand--embraces

what might vulgarly be called the successful brains of New York--and

those of other cities which have come to us to stay. Mind you, I mean

successful in the right way: editors, publishers and authors, who aim

only to give the world the most fastidious expression of the American

spirit, a few artists--although, as a rule, they herd together; but

there are several fine illustrators who class themselves with us;

also people who do not pretend to give to the public, but who love

literature, music, and art of all sorts and prefer meeting people of

brains and refinement to associating with a class which thinks of

nothing but spending money.”

“In short,” I exclaimed, “you are the true aristocracy of New York.”

“Yes,” he replied unsuspiciously. “I think we are. There was a time

when to be in the fashionable set of New York argued birth and

breeding; money was no passport in those days. But to-day there is

no other; the ‘400,’ as it is absurdly called, has so few family

trees that they could all be stored in one linen closet; it is money,

money--and--consequently--the sort of vulgarity one most wants to

avoid.”

“But many of your set must have money,” I said, determined to get to

the bottom of these puzzling distinctions; “all of these cottages must

have cost a great deal of money, particularly on top of a mountain with

corduroy roads; and the keeper has often let fall remarks from which I

have inferred that no economy is practised by your friends.”

“Oh, yes,” he replied with that flicker of humour in his eyes and voice

which makes him transiently human, “there are several respectable

millions among us, but the point is, we none of us are disgustingly

rich. We are not known by our wealth, it is not invariably mentioned

coincidently with our names, and, indeed, we stand on quite another

basis. And many of these delightful people you will meet in a few days

are only comfortably off--although they all have enough to entertain

with in their own individual fashion.”

“You don’t mean that some are eccentric?” I demanded. “Surely you would

not countenance eccentricity.”

“Certainly not!” he exclaimed, quite as emphatically as I had expected;

“no cultivated person ever was eccentric and ‘Bohemians’ are welcome

to the monopoly of it for their vulgar advertising. I mean that each

entertains according to his--or shall I say her?--means, and manages so

to stamp her affairs with her own individuality that one never thinks

of the amount expended.”

“It sounds very alluring, but a little alarming,” I said. “Do they

_all_ come up here?”

“Oh, no, and many more men than women. Our women have their delicious

frivolities, I assure you, and are always running over to Europe to

replenish their really splendid wardrobes, while others seem never to

tire of travel. But those who do come are very representative and I

want you to like them better than those whose highest ambition is to

get into your own set in England.”

“I have met some charming Americans,” I replied, “and they always

seemed bright and full of talk. It was only when they tried to be

English that I didn’t like them. Bertie adores American women, but

whether he will like this superior intellectual variety----”

“Oh, do not form an erroneous impression,” he said, hastily. “I assure

you they do not in any way resemble the poor Bostonians who have been

so severely caricatured. They have accomplished the happy combination

of intellectual activity and appreciation, with a light worldliness and

a love of the best that their money and opportunities can buy, which

makes them unique in their country.”

“I infer that your set is quite exclusive, difficult to get into.”

“It is--much more so than the fashionable set, for money is far more

plentiful in this country than that peculiar combination of brains,

culture, and pecuniary success which I may say is the hallmark of our

set. I have a theory that the right sort of gifts always is successful;

by that I mean those gifts which are distinctively American in the

highest sense--Americanism in all its wonderful distinctiveness, but

polished, refined, cultivated, purified of dross. The exponents of it

naturally are successful with the large increasing number throughout

the country who possess the instinct to rise higher and strive for the

best; therefore, when these exponents are gathered together anywhere,

they form a fastidious circle which excludes inharmonious spirits,

and constitutes what is now the real aristocracy of the country. But,

I can assure you, we are perfectly normal,” he added, with his rare

delightful smile. “We dine and wine each other, have many a game of

poker, love sport, have our boxes at the opera, and know the world

pretty thoroughly.”

“It sounds profoundly interesting,” I said, but when I repeated the

conversation to Bertie he growled that it was “jolly rot.”

“I shall like the men if they are like Rogers,” he added; “for he’s

a jolly good sort inside that chain-mail armour of his; but I feel

sure I shall hate the women. I’ll be bound they are rotters, every

one of them--the personification of their self-conscious provincial

literature. If they are I’ll make a public scandal by flirting with

Jemima.”

The aristocrats · 第 10 / 49 题