CHAPTER X

I find by consulting my diary that it was on the 30th of June that I

went to Dublin. I am not often in Dublin, though I do not share the

contempt for that city which is felt by most Ulstermen. Cahoon, for

instance, will not recognize it as the capital of the country in which

he lives, and always speaks of Dublin people as impractical, given

over to barren political discussion and utterly unable to make useful

things such as ships and linen. He also says that Dublin is dirty,

that the rates are exorbitantly high, and that the houses have not got

bath-rooms in them. I put it to him that there are two first-rate

libraries in Dublin.

"If I want a book," he said, "I buy it. We pay for what we use in

Belfast. We are business men."

"But," I explained, "there are some books, old ones, which you cannot

buy. You can only consult them in libraries."

"Why don't you go to London, then?" said Cahoon.

The conversation took place in the club. I lunched there on my way

through Belfast, going on to Dublin by an afternoon train. I was, in

fact, going to Dublin to consult some books in the College Library.

Marion and I had been brought up short in our labours on my history

for want of some quotations from the diary of a seventeenth-century

divine, and even if I had been willing to buy the book I should have

had to wait months while a second-hand bookseller advertised for it.

Trinity College, when I entered the quadrangle next day, seemed

singularly deserted. The long vacation had begun a week before.

Fellows, professors and students had fled from the scene of their

labours. Halfway across the square, however, I met McNeice. He seemed

quite glad to see me and invited me to luncheon in his rooms. I

accepted the invitation and was fed on cold ham, stale bread and

bottled stout.

Thackeray once hinted that fellows of Trinity College gave their

guests beer to drink. Many hard words have been said of him ever since

by members of Dublin University. I have no wish to have hard things

said about me; so I explain myself carefully. McNeice's luncheon was

an eccentricity. It is not on cold ham solely, it is not on stale

bread ever, that guests in the Common Room are fed. If, like Prince

Hal, they remember amid their feasting "that good creature, small

beer," they do not drink it without being offered nobler beverages.

When the University, in recognition of my labours on the Life of St.

Patrick, made me a doctor of both kinds of law, I fared sumptuously in

the dining hall and afterwards sipped port rich with the glory of suns

which shone many many years ago on the banks of the upper Douro.

After luncheon, while I was still heavy with the spume of the stout,

McNeice asked me if I had seen the new paper which was being published

to express, I imagine also to exacerbate, the opinions of the Ulster

Unionists. He produced a copy as he spoke. It was called _The

Loyalist_.

"We wanted something with a bite in it," he said. "We're dead sick of

the pap the daily papers give us in their leading articles."

Pap is, I think, a soft innocuous food, slightly sugary in flavour,

suitable for infants. I should never have dreamed of describing the

articles in _The Belfast Newsletter_ as pap. An infant nourished on

them would either suffer badly from the form of indigestion called

flatulence or would grow up to be an exceedingly ferocious man. I

felt, however, that if McNeice had anything to do with the editing of

_The Loyalist_ its articles would be of such a kind that those of the

_Newsletter_ would seem, by comparison, papescent.

"We're running it as a weekly," said McNeice, "and what we want is to

get it into the home of every Protestant farmer, and every working-man

in Belfast. We are circulating the first six numbers free. After that

we shall charge a penny."

I looked at _The Loyalist_. It was very well printed, on good paper.

It looked something like _The Spectator_, but had none of the pleasant

advertisements of schools and books, and much fewer pages of

correspondence than the English weekly has.

"Surely," I said, "you can't expect it to pay at that price."

"We don't," said McNeice. "We've plenty of money behind us.

Conroy--you know Conroy, don't you?"

"Oh," I said, "then Lady Moyne got a subscription out of him after

all. I knew she intended to."

"Lady Moyne isn't in this at all," said McNeice. "We're out for

business with _The Loyalist_. Lady Moyne's--well, I don't quite see

Lady Moyne running _The Loyalist_."

"She's a tremendously keen Unionist," I said. "She gave an address to

the working-women of Belfast the week before last, one of the most

moving--"

"All frills," said McNeice, "silk frills. Your friend Crossan is

acting as one of our agents, distributing the paper for us. That'll

give you an idea of the lines we're going on."

Crossan, I admit, is the last man I should suspect of being interested

in frills. The mention of his name gave me an idea.

"Was it copies of _The Loyalist_," I asked, "which were in the

packing-cases which you and Power landed that night from the

_Finola_?"

McNeice laughed.

"Come along round with me," he said, "and see the editor. He'll

interest you. He's a first-rate journalist, used to edit a rebel paper

and advocate the use of physical force for throwing off the English

rule. But he's changed his tune now. Just wait for me one moment while

I get together an article which I promised to bring him. It's all

scattered about the floor of the next room in loose sheets."

I read _The Loyalist_ while I waited. The editor was unquestionably a

first-rate journalist. His English was of a naked, muscular kind,

which reminded me of Swift and occasionally of John Mitchel. But I

could not agree with McNeice that he had changed his tune. He still

seemed to be editing a rebel paper and still advocated the use of

physical force for resisting the will of the King, Lords and Commons

of our constitution. It is the merest commonplace to say that Ireland

is a country of unblushing self-contradictions; but I do not think

that the truth of this ever came home to me quite so forcibly as when

I read _The Loyalist_ that it would be better, if necessary, to

imitate the Boers and shoot down regiments of British soldiers than to

be false to the Empire of which "it is our proudest boast that we are

citizens." The editor--such was the conclusion I arrived at--must be a

humorist of a high order.

His name was Diarmid O'Donovan and he always wrote it in Irish

characters, which used to puzzle me at first when I got into

correspondence with him. We found him in a small room at the top of a

house in a side street of a singularly depressing kind.

McNeice explained to me that _The Loyalist_ did not court notoriety,

and preferred to have an office which was, as far as possible, out of

sight. He said that O'Donovan was particularly anxious to be

unobtrusive. He had, before he became connected with _The Loyalist_,

been editor of two papers which had been suppressed by the Government

for advocating what the Litany calls "sedition and privy conspiracy."

He held, very naturally, that a paper would get on better in the world

if it had no office at all. If that was impossible, the office should

be an attic in an inaccessible slum.

O'Donovan, when we entered, was seated at a table writing vigorously.

I do not know how he managed to write at all. His table was covered

with stacks of newspapers, very dusty. He had cleared a small, a very

small space in the middle of them, and his ink-bottle occupied a kind

of cave hollowed out at the base of one of the stacks. It must have

been extremely difficult to put a pen into it. The chairs--there were

only two of them besides the editorial stool--were also covered with

papers. But even if they had been free I should not have cared to sit

down on them. They were exceedingly dirty and did not look safe.

McNeice introduced me and then produced his own article. O'Donovan,

very politely, offered me his stool.

"McNeice tells me," he said, "that you are writing a history of Irish

Rebellions. I suppose you have said that Nationalism ceased to exist

about the year 1900?"

"I hadn't thought of saying that," I said. "In fact--in view of the

Home Rule Bill, you know--I should have said that Irish Nationalism

was just beginning to come to its own."

O'Donovan snorted.

"There's no such thing as Irish Nationalism left," he said. "The

country is hypnotized. We've accepted a Bill which deprives us of the

most elementary rights of freemen. We've licked the boots of English

Liberals. We've said 'thank you' for any gnawed bones they like to

fling to us. We've--"

It struck me that O'Donovan was becoming rhetorical. I interrupted

him.

"Idealism in politics," I said, "is one of the most futile things

there is. What the Nationalist Party--"

"Don't call them that," said O'Donovan. "I tell you they're not

Nationalists."

"I'll call them anything you like," I said, "but until you invent some

other name for them I can't well talk about them without calling them

Nationalists."

"They--" said O'Donovan.

"Very well," I said. "_They._ So long as you know who I mean, the

pronoun will satisfy me. They had to consider not what men like you

wanted, but what the Liberal Party could be induced to give. I don't

say they made the best bargain possible, but--"

"Anyhow," said McNeice, "we're not going to be governed by those

fellows. That's the essential point."

I think it is. The Unionist is not really passionately attached to the

Union. He has no insuperable antipathy to Home Rule. Indeed, I think

most Unionists would welcome any change in our existing system of

government if it were not that they have the most profound and deeply

rooted objection to the men whom McNeice describes as "those fellows,"

and O'Donovan indicates briefly as "they."

"And so," I said, turning to O'Donovan, "in mere despair of

nationality you have gone over to the side of the Unionists."

"I've gone over," said O'Donovan, "to the side of the only people in

Ireland who mean to fight."

Supposing that Ulster really did mean to fight O'Donovan's position

was quite reasonable. But Babberly says it will never come to

fighting. He is quite confident of his ability to bluff the

conscientious Liberal into dropping the Home Rule Bill for fear of

civil war. O'Donovan, and possibly McNeice, will be left out in the

cold if Babberly is right. The matter is rather a tangled one. With

Babberly is Lady Moyne, working at her ingenious policy of dragging a

red herring across the path along which democracy goes towards

socialism. On the other hand there is McNeice with fiery intelligence,

and O'Donovan, a coldly consistent rebel against English rule in any

shape and form. They have their little paper with money enough behind

it, with people like Crossan circulating it for them. It is quite

possible that they may count for something. Then there is Malcolmson,

a man of almost incredible stupidity, but with a knowledge, hammered

into him no doubt with extra difficulty, of how to handle guns.

O'Donovan and McNeice were bending over some proof sheets and talking

in low whispers; there was a knock at the office door, and a moment

later Malcolmson entered. He looked bristlier than ever, and was

plainly in a state of joyous excitement. He held a copy of the first

number of _The Loyalist_ in his hand. He caught sight of me at once.

"I'm damned," he said, "if I expected to see you here, Kilmore. You're

the last man in Ireland--"

"I'm only here by accident," I said, "and I'm going away almost at

once. Let me introduce you to Mr. McNeice and Mr. O'Donovan."

Malcolmson shook hands with the two men vigorously. I never shake

hands with Malcolmson if I can possibly help it, because he always

hurts me. I expect he hurt both McNeice and O'Donovan. They did not

cry out, but they looked a good deal surprised.

"I happened to be in Dublin," said Malcolmson, "and I called round

here to congratulate the editor of this paper. I only came across it

the day before yesterday, and--"

"You couldn't have come across it any sooner," I said, "for it's only

just published."

"And to put down my name as a subscriber for twenty copies. If you

want money--"

"They don't," I said, "Conroy is financing them."

"Conroy has some sound ideas," said Malcolmson.

"You approve of the paper, then?" said McNeice.

"I like straight talk," said Malcolmson.

"We aim at that," said O'Donovan.

"I'm dead sick of politics and speech making," said Malcolmson. "What

I want is to have a slap at the damned rebels."

"Mr. O'Donovan's point of view," I said, "is almost the same as yours.

What he wants--"

"I'm glad to hear it," said Malcolmson, "and I need only say that when

the time comes, gentlemen, and it won't be long now if things go on as

they are going--you'll find me ready. What Ireland wants--"

Malcolmson paused. I waited expectantly. It is always interesting to

hear what Ireland wants. Many people have theories on the subject, and

hardly any one agrees with any one else.

"What Ireland wants," said Malcolmson dramatically, "is another Oliver

Cromwell."

He drew himself up and puffed out his chest as he spoke. He must, I

think, have rather fancied himself in the part of a twentieth century

Puritan horse soldier. I looked round at O'Donovan to see how he was

taking the suggestion. Oliver Cromwell I supposed, could not possibly

be one of his favourite heroes. But I had misjudged O'Donovan. His

sympathy with rebels of all nations was evidently stronger than his

dislike of the typical Englishman. After all, Cromwell, however

objectionable his religious views may have been, did kill a king.

O'Donovan smiled quite pleasantly at Malcolmson. I dare say that even

the idea of a new massacre of Drogheda was agreeable enough to him,

provided the inhabitants of the town were the people to whom he denied

the title of Nationalists and Malcolmson wanted to have a slap at

because they were rebels.

Then McNeice got us all back to practical business in a way that would

have delighted Cahoon. McNeice, though he does live in Dublin, has

good Belfast blood in his veins. He likes his heroics to be put on a

business basis. The immediate and most pressing problem, he reminded

us, was to secure as large a circulation as possible for _The

Loyalist_.

"You get the paper into the people's hands," he said to Malcolmson,

"and we'll get the ideas into their heads."

Malcolmson, who is certainly prepared to make sacrifices in a good

cause, offered to hire a man with a motorcycle to distribute the paper

from house to house over a wide district.

"I know the exact man we want," he said. "He knows every house in

County Antrim, and the people like him. He's been distributing Bibles

and selling illuminated texts among the farmers and labourers for

years. He's what's called a colporteur. That," he turned to O'Donovan

with his explanation, "is a kind of Scripture reader, you know."

If any one in the world except Malcolmson had suggested the employment

of a Scripture reader for the distribution of _The Loyalist_, I should

have applauded a remarkable piece of cynicism. But Malcolmson was in

simple earnest.

"Will you be able to get him?" I said. "The society which employs him

may perhaps--"

"Oh, that will be all right," said Malcolmson. "There can't be any

objection. But if there is--I happen to be a member of the committee

of the society. I'm one"--he sunk his voice modestly--"of the largest

subscribers."

I am inclined to forget sometimes that Malcolmson takes a leading part

in Church affairs. At the last meeting of the General Synod of the

Church of Ireland he said that the distribution of the Bible among the

people of Ireland was the surest means of quenching the desire for

Home Rule. Free copies of _The Loyalist_ for the people who already

have Bibles and a force of artillery are, so to speak, his reserves.

The Red Hand of Ulster · 第 10 / 24 章