MR W. W. GRENVILLE TO THE MARQUIS OF BUCKINGHAM.

Whitehall, Dec. 17th, 1788.

MY DEAR BROTHER,

I have nothing to add to what I said in my last letter, on the

interesting subject of your situation and conduct in the events

that may most reasonably be expected to arise. It appears, however,

to me, to be of the utmost importance that you should not neglect

for a moment taking the opinion of the law servants of the Crown in

Ireland, with respect to the operation of a new patent granted by a

Parliamentary Regent here, under the English Great Seal, previous

to any proceeding having been held in Ireland. I have a real

confidence in Fitzgibbon's honour; but I think this a point of much

too great importance to yourself, to be vested on verbal opinions.

You may, and I think ought, both to keep these written opinions

secret, and to require them to do so; but as soon as you have

received them, you should, I think, transmit them to Lord Sydney,

to remain in his office. You will observe that the ground is now in

some measure cleared for you by the declaration of right, which we

came to last night, and which will certainly be agreed to by the

House of Lords. I expected to have been able to send you an exact

copy of the resolutions, but am disappointed. You will, however,

probably see them in the "Morning Chronicle," if that comes out

early enough for the post. The first states the fact of the King's

present inability to attend to business, "and that the _personal

exercise_ of the royal authority by His Majesty is thereby for the

present interrupted."

The second: "That it is the right and duty of the Lords and Commons

(describing them as in the preamble to the Bill of Rights) to

provide the means of supplying the defect in the personal exercise,

&c., in such manner as the exigency of the case may appear to them

to require."

The third: "That for the above purpose, and for maintaining entire

the constitutional authority of His Majesty, it is necessary that

the said Lords and Commons should determine on the means by which

the royal assent may be given in Parliament to such Bill as may be

passed by the two Houses, respecting the exercise of the royal

power, in the name and on the behalf of His Majesty, during the

continuance of His Majesty's indisposition."

I believe I have given you very nearly the words, which I ought to

remember, having employed very near the whole of two days in

settling them with Pitt and our lawyers.

Our principle is, that the King's authority remains entire. That no

legislative act can be done but with the formal sanction of his

assent. That no person can take upon him to give that assent,

except by the direction and authority of the two Houses, who have

the right, in the present emergency, to act for the King; but must,

even in doing that, adhere as nearly as possible to the forms of

the Constitution.

Fox opposed these resolutions, in one of the best speeches I ever

heard from him; but I think indiscreetly supporting and enforcing

all his old ground of the Prince of Wales's right. Towards the end,

he made a violent personal attack on Pitt, intimating that he was

desirous, through envy, to weaken the hands of those _who were to

be his successors_. This opening was not neglected by Pitt, but

laid hold of in a manner which enabled him to speak of his own

conduct towards the King and the Prince, and towards the country in

the present moment, and to contrast it with that of his opponents.

I never heard a finer burst of eloquence, nor witnessed such an

impression as it produced. But you will know all this better from

the papers.

The division exceeded our expectations. All the neutrals, and many

of the wavering people, and some of the most timid of our friends,

were against us, on the ground of the inexpediency of agitating

this question. You will also naturally see that something is to be

allowed for the impression of two Princes of the blood speaking;

one of them to assure the country that the Prince of Wales would

not urge this claim, and both beseeching, as a sort of personal

point, that it might not be made necessary to come to a division

upon the question. Still, however, the impression which the claim

itself had made on the country, was such that it was a point of

real duty to quiet people's minds upon it. But it cannot be

surprising, that under all these circumstances, and under the fear

of some unexplained danger, many people should be caught by a

previous question. I was a little mortified at finding our friend

Sir P. P. among these. I had no previous intimation of this till I

saw him in the division, nor have I had any opportunity of

conversing with him since. I am not sure that he did not think he

ought to have been a Lord of the Admiralty instead of Lord Hood. It

is either that, or his intercourse with some of the Independents.

On the whole, I think it better to leave him to himself, as I do

not think I have sufficient influence over him to do any good, and

the attempt might do harm. You know best how you stand in that

respect. We have certainly no claim upon him beyond friendship and

opinion.

Lord Lonsdale's people were against us, in consequence of a letter,

written by the Prince of Wales himself, soliciting it as a personal

favour. This, which I know _from authority_, may serve to give you

an idea of the pains they had taken. They were so confident, that,

on Sunday night, Fox assured the whole party, at a general meeting

at Burlington House, that he had no doubt of beating us. I imagine

that we are now sure of carrying our restrictions, and probably by

a larger majority.

Lord Loraine has separated himself from the Duke of N.; in

consequence of which, Rainsforth has vacated. We do not know who

comes in, but Lord Loraine says it is a friend.

Gerard Hamilton is among the rats, which is no small amusement to

me, who have frequently been abused by Pitt for my bad opinion of

him, at the time that he was swallowing toads _a toute outrance_.

There are one or two more individual members in the House of

Commons, but nobody of any consequence but the Duke of Queensbury,

which, though everybody expected it, is nevertheless a thing that

raises my indignation in no small degree.

The popular opinion shows itself every day more and more, and I

have no doubt you will hear of addresses, &c. Fox's declaration of

the Prince of Wales's right has been of no small service to us. Is

it not wonderful that such great talents should be conducted with

so little judgment?

Our mode of proceeding will now be to communicate these

resolutions to the Lords; and when they have concurred in them,

then to bring forward the plan; and lastly, to authorize the Lord

Chancellor to put the Great Seal to a commission to His Royal

Highness, to empower him to open the Parliament, and afterwards to

another (at least, _I_ think they should be separate), authorizing

him to give the royal assent to the Bill appointing him Regent.

You will easily see, that all this will be no very short

proceeding. In the meantime, the prospect of the King's recovery is

daily growing more favourable. Willis and Addington have both said,

_separately_, that his emotion at seeing the Queen for the first

time, and his subsequent agitation, instead of being discouraging,

were symptoms highly favourable. He is now quite calm; and at three

o'clock yesterday, the account which came from Willis was, that he

was better than at any time since his illness.

It will be ridiculous if he should recover just in time to give the

royal _dissent_ to the Regency Bill--which is not impossible. The

more probable supposition is, that they will just have time to

parcel out the spoils, to dismiss us, and to hold their offices

about a month; and so will end (if this should happen) the third

reign of King Charles III.

So little was said about Ireland, that it would have been an

affectation in me to have talked about it; besides this, I had no

opportunity of speaking that pleased me.

Ever most affectionately yours,

W. W. G.

What I mentioned in my last about the four Princes, I now _know_

not to be true with respect to the Duke of Gloucester, who has held

aloof from all cabal with them, and even declared in the House of

Lords that he had done so.

Memoirs of the Court and Cabinets of George the Third From the Original Family Documents, Volume 2 · 第 62 / 390 题