_The sinking of great stones through the action of worms._--When a

stone of large size and of irregular shape is left on the surface of

the ground, it rests, of course, on the more protuberant parts; but

worms soon fill up with their castings all the hollow spaces on the

lower side; for, as Hensen remarks, they like the shelter of stones.

As soon as the hollows are filled up, the worms eject the earth which

they have swallowed beyond the circumference of the stones; and thus

the surface of the ground is raised all round the stone. As the

burrows excavated directly beneath the stone after a time collapse,

the stone sinks a little. Hence it is, that boulders which at some

ancient period have rolled down from a rocky mountain or cliff on to a

meadow at its base, are always somewhat imbedded in the soil; and,

when removed, leave an exact impression of their lower surfaces in

the under-lying fine mould. If, however, a boulder is of such huge

dimensions, that the earth beneath is kept dry, such earth will not be

inhabited by worms, and the boulder will not sink into the ground.

A lime-kiln formerly stood in a grass-field near Leith Hill Place, in

Surrey, and was pulled down 35 years before my visit; all the loose

rubbish had been carted away, excepting three large stones of

quartzose sandstone, which it was thought might hereafter be of some

use. An old workman remembered that they had been left on a bare

surface of broken bricks and mortar, close to the foundations of the

kiln; but the whole surrounding surface is now covered with turf and

mould. The two largest of these stones had never since been moved; nor

could this easily have been done, as, when I had them removed, it was

the work of two men with levers. One of these stones, and not the

largest, was 64 inches long, 17 inches broad, and from 9 to 10 inches

in thickness. Its lower surface was somewhat protuberant in the

middle; and this part still rested on broken bricks and mortar,

showing the truth of the old workman's account. Beneath the brick

rubbish the natural sandy soil, full of fragments of sandstone, was

found; and this could have yielded very little, if at all, to the

weight of the stone, as might have been expected if the sub-soil had

been clay. The surface of the field, for a distance of about 9 inches

round the stone, gradually sloped up to it, and close to the stone

stood in most places about 4 inches above the surrounding ground. The

base of the stone was buried from 1 to 2 inches beneath the general

level, and the upper surface projected about 8 inches above this

level, or about 4 inches above the sloping border of turf. After the

removal of the stone it became evident that one of its pointed ends

must at first have stood clear above the ground by some inches, but

its upper surface was now on a level with the surrounding turf. When

the stone was removed, an exact cast of its lower side, forming a

shallow crateriform hollow, was left, the inner surface of which

consisted of fine, black mould, excepting where the more protuberant

parts rested on the brick-rubbish. A transverse section of this stone,

together with its bed, drawn from measurements made after it had been

displaced, is here given on a scale of 1/2 inch to a foot (Fig. 2). The

turf-covered border which sloped up to the stone, consisted of fine

vegetable mould, in one part 7 inches in thickness. This evidently

consisted of worm-castings, several of which had been recently

ejected. The whole stone had sunk in the thirty-five years, as far as

I could judge, about 11/2 inch; and this must have been due to the

brick-rubbish beneath the more protuberant parts having been

undermined by worms. At this rate, the upper surface of the stone, if

it had been left undisturbed, would have sunk to the general level of

the field in 247 years; but before this could have occurred, some

earth would have been washed down by heavy rain from the castings on

the raised border of turf over the upper surface of the stone.

[Illustration: FIG. 2.

Transverse section across a large stone, which had lain on a

grass-field for thirty-five years. _aa_, general level of the

field. The underlying brick of rubbish has not been represented.]

The second stone was larger than the one just described, viz.,

67 inches in length, 39 in breadth, and 15 in thickness. The lower

surface was nearly flat, so that the worms must soon have been

compelled to eject their castings beyond its circumference. The stone

as a whole had sunk about 2 inches into the ground. At this rate it

would have required 262 years for its upper surface to have sunk to

the general level of the field. The upwardly sloping, turf-covered

border round the stone was broader than in the last case, viz., from

14 to 16 inches; and why this should be so, I could see no reason. In

most parts this border was not so high as in the last case, viz., from

2 to 21/2 inches, but in one place it was as much as 51/2. Its average

height close to the stone was probably about 3 inches, and it thinned

out to nothing. If so, a layer of fine earth, 15 inches in breadth and

11/2 inch in average thickness, of sufficient length to surround the

whole of the much elongated slab, must have been brought up by the

worms in chief part from beneath the stone in the course of 35 years.

This amount would be amply sufficient to account for its having sunk

about 2 inches into the ground; more especially if we bear in mind

that a good deal of the finest earth would have been washed by heavy

rain from the castings ejected on the sloping border down to the level

of the field. Some fresh castings were seen close to the stone.

Nevertheless, on digging a large hole to a depth of 18 inches where

the stone had lain, only two worms and a few burrows were seen,

although the soil was damp and seemed favorable for worms. There were

some large colonies of ants beneath the stone, and possibly since

their establishment the worms had decreased in number.

The third stone was only about half as large as the others; and two

strong boys could together have rolled it over. I have no doubt that

it had been rolled over at a moderately recent time, for it now lay at

some distance from the two other stones at the bottom of a little

adjoining slope. It rested also on fine earth, instead of partly on

brick-rubbish. In agreement with this conclusion, the raised

surrounding border of turf was only 1 inch high in some parts, and

2 inches in other parts. There were no colonies of ants beneath this

stone, and on digging a hole where it had lain, several burrows and

worms were found.

At Stonehenge, some of the outer Druidical stones are now prostrate,

having fallen at a remote but unknown period; and these have become

buried to a moderate depth in the ground. They are surrounded by

sloping borders of turf, on which recent castings were seen. Close to

one of these fallen stones, which was 17 feet long, 6 feet broad, and

281/2 inches thick, a hole was dug; and here the vegetable mould was at

least 91/2 inches in thickness. At this depth a flint was found, and a

little higher up on one side of the hole a fragment of glass. The base

of the stone lay about 91/2 inches beneath the level of the surrounding

ground, and its upper surface 19 inches above the ground.

A hole was also dug close to a second huge stone, which in falling had

broken into two pieces; and this must have happened long ago, judging

from the weathered aspect of the fractured ends. The base was buried

to a depth of 10 inches, as was ascertained by driving an iron skewer

horizontally into the ground beneath it. The vegetable mould forming

the turf-covered sloping border round the stone, on which many

castings had recently been ejected, was 10 inches in thickness; and

most of this mould must have been brought up by worms from beneath its

base. At a distance of 8 yards from the stone, the mould was only

51/2 inches in thickness (with a piece of tobacco pipe at a depth of

4 inches), and this rested on broken flint and chalk which could not

have easily yielded to the pressure or weight of the stone.

A straight rod was fixed horizontally (by the aid of a spirit-level)

across a third fallen stone, which was 7 feet 9 inches long; and the

contour of the projecting parts and of the adjoining ground, which was

not quite level, was thus ascertained, as shown in the accompanying

diagram (Fig. 3) on a scale of 1/2 inch to a foot. The turf-covered

border sloped up to the stone on one side to a height of 4 inches, and

on the opposite side to only 21/2 inches above the general level. A hole

was dug on the eastern side, and the base of the stone was here found

to lie at a depth of 4 inches beneath the general level of the

ground, and of 8 inches beneath the top of the sloping turf-covered

border.

[Illustration: FIG. 3.

Section through one of the fallen Druidical stones at Stonehenge,

showing how much it had sunk into the ground.]

Sufficient evidence has now been given showing that small objects left

on the surface of the land where worms abound soon get buried, and

that large stones sink slowly downwards through the same means. Every

step of the process could be followed, from the accidental deposition

of a single casting on a small object lying loose on the surface, to

its being entangled amidst the matted roots of the turf, and lastly to

its being embedded in the mould at various depths beneath the surface.

When the same field was re-examined after the interval of a few years,

such objects were found at a greater depth than before. The

straightness and regularity of the lines formed by the embedded

objects, and their parallelism with the surface of the land, are the

most striking features of the case; for this parallelism shows how

equably the worms must have worked; the result being, partly the

effect of the washing down of the fresh castings by rain. The specific

gravity of the objects does not affect their rate of sinking, as could

be seen by porous cinders, burnt marl, chalk and quartz pebbles,

having all sunk to the same depth within the same time. Considering

the nature of the sub-stratum, which at Leith Hill Place was sandy

soil including many bits of rock, and at Stonehenge, chalk-rubble with

broken flints; considering, also, the presence of the turf-covered

sloping border of mould round the great fragments of stone at both

these places, their sinking does not appear to have been sensibly

aided by their weight, though this was considerable.

_On the number of worms which live within a given space._--We will

now show, first, what a vast number of worms live unseen by us beneath

our feet, and, secondly, the actual weight of the earth which they

bring up to the surface within a given space and within a given time.

Hensen, who has published so full and interesting an account of the

habits of worms, calculates, from the number which he found in a

measured space, that there must exist 133,000 living worms in a

hectare of land, or 53,767 in an acre. This latter number of worms

would weigh 356 pounds, taking Hensen's standard of the weight of a

single worm, namely, one gram. It should, however, be noted that this

calculation is founded on the numbers found in a garden, and Hensen

believes that worms are here twice as numerous as in corn-fields. The

above result, astonishing though it be, seems to me credible, judging

from the number of worms which I have sometimes seen, and from the

number daily destroyed by birds without the species being

exterminated. Some barrels of bad ale were left on Mr. Miller's land,

in the hope of making vinegar, but the vinegar proved bad, and the

barrels were upset. It should be premised that acetic acid is so

deadly a poison to worms that Perrier found that a glass rod dipped

into this acid and then into a considerable body of water in which

worms were immersed, invariably killed them quickly. On the morning

after the barrels had been upset, "the heaps of worms which lay dead

on the ground were so amazing, that if Mr. Miller had not seen them,

he could not have thought it possible for such numbers to have existed

in the space." As further evidence of the large number of worms which

live in the ground Hensen states that he found in a garden 64 open

burrows in a space of 141/2 square feet, that is, 9 in 2 square feet.

But the burrows are sometimes much more numerous, for when digging in

a grass-field near Maer Hall, I found a cake of dry earth, as large as

my two open hands, which was penetrated by seven burrows, as large as

goose-quills.

[Illustration]

TWO FOPS AMONG THE FISHES

(FROM GLEANINGS FROM NATURE.)[7]

BY W. S. BLATCHLEY.

[7] Copyright by W. S. Blatchley, 1899.

I.--THE RAINBOW DARTER.

"Little fishy in the brook."

[Illustration]

Not the one "daddy caught with a hook," but another, too small for the

hook, too small for the frying-pan, too small for aught else but

beauty, and gracefulness of form; and yet not the young of a larger

fish, but full grown of himself. In every brook in the State he may be

found, yea, even in the rill, no more than a foot in width, which

leads away from the old spring-house on the hillside. You will not

find him swimming about like the minnows in the still, deep water of

the stream, but where the clear, cold water is rushing rapidly over

the stones of a ripple he makes his home. There he rests quietly on

the bottom, waiting patiently for his food, the larvae or young of

gnats, mosquitoes, and other such insects, to float by.

If you attempt to catch him, or your shadow suddenly frightens him,

with a sweep of his broad pectoral or breast fins, he moves quicker

than a flash a few feet farther up the stream, and then as suddenly

comes to a stop, and resumes his quiet, "thoughtful" attitude. If you

persist in your attempt to capture him, he will dart under a small

stone or submerged leaf, where, like the foolish ostrich which when

pursued hides her head under her wing, no longer seeing you, he thinks

himself secure.

[Illustration: RAINBOW DARTER.]

On account of the shape of his body, as well as on account of his

rapid movements, he has received the surname "darter." Belonging to

the group which bears this surname, there are, in the eastern half of

the United States, about forty-seven species or kinds, the largest of

which, when full grown, measures only about six inches in length,

while the smallest species never reaches a length of more than an inch

and a half. They all have the same habits, and at least twenty-nine

kinds of them are found in Indiana; but the one of which I am writing

is much the more common. He is from two to two and a half inches in

length, and, like the other members of his family, has two fins on his

back; "dorsal" fins they are called by naturalists, the front one of

which contains ten short spines. During eight months of the year, the

males and females dress alike in a suit of brownish olive which is

striped on the sides with ten or twelve narrow, black cross-bars, and

more or less blotched on the back with darker spots. But on the first

warm days of spring, when the breezes blow up from the gulf, awakening

the gypsy in our blood, the little male fish feels, too, their

influence, and in him there arises an irresistible desire to

"a-courting go." Like most other beings of his sex, he thinks his

every-day suit too plain for the important business before him. It

will, in his opinion, ne'er catch the eye of his lady love. So he dons

one of gaudy colors and from it takes his name,--the rainbow

darter,--for in it he is best known, as it not only attracts the

attention of his chosen one, but often also that of the wandering

naturalist who happens along the stream.

The blackish bars of other seasons are changed to indigo blue, while

the space between them assumes a hue of the brightest orange. The fins

are broadly edged with blue and have the bases orange, or orange and

scarlet, while the cheeks assume the blue and the breast becomes an

orange. Clad in this suit he ventures forth on his mission, and if

successful, as he almost always is, the two construct a nest of tiny

stones in which the eggs of the mother-fish are laid and watched over

with jealous care by both parents until in time there issue forth sons

destined some day to wear a coat of many colors, and "darters" to be

attracted by those coats, as was their mother by the one their father

wore.

Although so abundant and so brilliant in the springtime, the rainbow

darter is known to few but naturalists. The fishes in which the

average country boy is interested are the larger ones--such as the

goggle-eye, the sucker, chub, and sunfish--those which, when caught,

will fill up the string and tickle the palate.

But there are, let us hope, among our farmers' sons and daughters,

some who are learning to take an interest in the objects of nature

which are beautiful, as well as in those which are useful. To them I

will say, if you wish to see something really pretty, make a seine

from an old coffee sack or a piece of mosquito netting, and any day in

spring drag two or three ripples of the branch which flows through the

wood's pasture, and ten chances to one you will get some "rainbows."

By placing them in a fruit jar three-fourths full of clear, cold

water, and renewing the water every few hours, they can be kept for

several days; but they cannot bear the confinement long, accustomed as

they are to the free running stream from which they were taken.

By taking the rainbow as the type of the darter and studying closely

its habits, both in captivity and in the streams, much can be learned

about a group which, in the words of Dr. S. A. Forbes, "are the

mountaineers among fishes. Forced from the populous and fertile

valleys of the river beds and lake bottoms, they have taken refuge

from their enemies in the rocky highlands where the free waters play

in ceaseless torrents, and there they have wrested from stubborn

nature a meagre living. Although diminished in size by their

continual struggle with the elements, they have developed an activity

and hardihood, a vigor of life and a glow of high color almost unknown

among the easier livers of the lower lands."

II.--THE LONG-EARED SUNFISH.

Among the most brightly colored of all the fresh-water members of the

finny tribe is the long-eared sunfish. When full grown its length is

about eight inches and the breadth one-half as much. The color is then

a brilliant blue and orange, the former predominating above; the

orange on the sides in spots, the blue in wavy, vertical streaks. The

cheeks are orange with bright blue stripes; the fins with the

membranes orange, and the rays blue. Extending back from the hind

margin of each cheek is a conspicuous blackish membrane termed an

"ear-flap," which in this species is longer than in any other of the

sun-fish family, whence the specific name, _megalotis_, from two Greek

words meaning "great" and "ear."

[Illustration: LONG-EARED SUNFISH.]

Within the placid pools of the brooks and larger streams of the State

this sunfish has its favorite haunts. Mid-summer is the time when its

habits can be best observed. On a recent August morn I sat for an

hour or longer on the banks of a stream, which flows through a wooded

blue-grass pasture, and watched the denizens of its waters. A peaceful

calm existed, the water being without a ripple and with scarce the

semblance of a flow--the air without the shadow of a breeze. Dragon

flies lazily winged their way across the pool, now resting daintily

upon a blade of sedge or swamp grass, now dipping the tips of their

abdomens beneath the surface of the water while depositing their eggs.

The only sounds of nature were the buzz of a bumble-bee feeding among

the flowers of the _Brunella_ at my side, and an occasional drawl of a

dog-day locust from the branches of the sycamore which threw a

grateful shade about me.

The sunfish "hung motionless" in the water, their heads towards me,

holding their position only by a slow flapping of their dorsal and

pectoral fins. Their nesting time over, their season's labor ended, it

was with them, as with many other beings, a time of languor.

These long-eared fishes are the lords and ladies of the respective

pools wherein they abide. When they move other smaller fry clear the

way. If a worm or gnat, falling upon the surface, tempts them, it is

theirs. A leaf falls near them and is seemingly unnoticed--a fly, and

how quickly their dormant energy is put into motion. With a dart and a

gulp the insect is swallowed, and a new stage of waiting expectancy is

ushered in.

How admirably fitted their form for cleaving the water! They often

seem to glide rather than propel themselves through its depths. Again,

how swiftly the caudal fin moves when with straight unerring motion

they dart upon their prey. At times one turns his body sideways, and,

with a slow, upward-gliding motion, moves toward some object on the

surface which is doubtfully "good to eat." He even takes it into his

mouth and then, not having faith in his power to properly digest it,

ejects it with force, and turning quickly darts back to the friendly

shadow of a boulder beneath whose sides he has, in time of threatened

danger, a safe retreat.

I throw a grasshopper into the pool. Like a flash six of the sunfish

are after it. One reaches it a tenth of a second in advance of the

others, and with a lightning-like gulp, which disturbs the serenity of

the surface of the pool, swallows the kicking prey. The energy of the

sun's heat and light, stored in grass, transmitted to move muscles in

gigantic leaps, will, in a short time, wag a caudal fin and propel the

owner through these watery depths.

Years are thus doubtless spent by these long-eared sunfish in a dreamy

sort of existence, their energies quickened by the vernal season and

growing duller on the approach of winter. Excepting the times when

they are tempted by a wriggling worm on some boy's hook, theirs is a

life exempt from danger. A kingfisher glancing down from his perch on

the bent sycamore limb may, at times, discern them and lessen their

ranks; but, methinks, the chub minnows, with fewer spines in their

dorsal fins, are more agreeable to the king-fisher's palate. With all

the tints of the rainbow gleaming from their sides they move to and

fro, the brilliant rulers of these quiet pools.

The king or monarch of those noted was most gorgeously arrayed. In

addition to the hues above described, a streak of emerald bordered his

dorsal and caudal fins and was bent around the edge of his upper

lip--a green mustache, as it were. By tolling them with occasional

bits of food I drew him and his retinue close into shore. There, for

some time they rested, watching eagerly for additional morsels. As I

was leaving I plucked from my sleeve an ant and threw it towards them.

A dart, a gurgle, a gulp--the leader had leaped half his length from

the water, and the ant was forever gone. The ripples receded and

finally disappeared, and the last scene in this tragedy of nature was

at an end.

[Illustration]

SEA-SLUGS AND CUTTLE-FISH

(FROM A JOURNAL OF RESEARCHES.)

BY CHARLES DARWIN.

[Illustration: CUTTLE-FISH.]

I was much interested, on several occasions, by watching the habits of

an Octopus, or cuttle-fish. Although common in the pools of water left

by the retiring tide, these animals were not easily caught. By means

of their long arms and suckers, they could drag their bodies into very

narrow crevices; and when thus fixed, it required great force to

remove them. At other times they darted, tail first, with the rapidity

of an arrow, from one side of the pool to the other, at the same

instant discoloring the water with a dark chestnut-brown ink. These

animals also escape detection by a very extraordinary, chameleon-like

power of changing their color. They appear to vary their tints

according to the nature of the ground over which they pass: when in

deep water, their general shade was brownish-purple, but when placed

on the land, or in shallow water, this dark tint changed into one of

a yellowish green. The color, examined more carefully, was a French

gray, with numerous minute spots of bright yellow: the former of these

varied in intensity; the latter entirely disappeared and appeared

again by turns. These changes were effected in such a manner, that

clouds, varying in tint between a hyacinth red and a chestnut brown,

were continually passing over the body. Any part, being subjected to a

slight shock of galvanism, became almost black: a similar effect, but

in a less degree, was produced by scratching the skin with a needle.

These clouds, or blushes as they may be called, are said to be

produced by the alternate contraction and expansion of minute

vescicles containing variously colored fluids.

A Book of Natural History Young Folks' Library Volume XIV. · 第 17 / 24 段