"They are exceedingly ferocious, and always offensive in their

habits, never running from man, as does the Chimpanzee. They are

objects of terror to the natives, and are never encountered by them

except on the defensive. The few that have been captured were killed

by elephant-hunters and native traders, as they came suddenly upon

them while passing through the forests.

"It is said that when the male is first seen he gives a terrific yell,

that resounds far and wide through the forest, something like kh--ah!

kh--ah! prolonged and shrill. His enormous jaws are widely opened at

each expiration, his under-lip hangs over the chin, and the hairy

ridge and scalp are contracted upon the brow, presenting an aspect of

indescribable ferocity.

"The females and young, at the first cry, quickly disappear. He then

approaches the enemy in great fury, pouring out his horrid cries in

quick succession. The hunter awaits his approach with his gun

extended; if his aim is not sure he permits the animal to grasp the

barrel, and as he carries it to his mouth (which is his habit) he

fires. Should the gun fail to go off, the barrel (that of the ordinary

musket, which is thin), is crashed between his teeth and the encounter

soon proves fatal to the hunter.

"In the wild state their habits are in general like those of the

_Troglodytes niger_, building their nests loosely in trees, living

on similar fruits, and changing their place of resort from force of

circumstances."

Dr. Savage's observations were confirmed and supplemented by those of

Mr. Ford, who communicated an interesting paper on the Gorilla to the

Philadelphian Academy of Sciences, in 1852. With respect to the

geographical distribution of this greatest of all the man-like Apes,

Mr. Ford remarks:

"This animal inhabits the range of mountains that traverse the

interior of Guinea from the Cameroon in the north to Angola in the

south, and about one hundred miles inland, and called by the

geographers Crystal Mountains. The limit to which this animal extends,

either north or south, I am unable to define. But that limit is

doubtless some distance north of this river [Gaboon]. I was able to

certify myself of this fact in a late excursion to the head-waters of

the Mooney (Danger) River, which comes into the sea some sixty miles

from this place. I was informed (credibly, I think), that they were

numerous among the mountains in which that river rises, and far north

of that.

"In the south, this species extends to the Congo River, as I am told

by native traders who have visited the coast, between the Gaboon and

that river. Beyond that, I am not informed. This animal is only found

at a distance from the coast in most cases, and, according to my best

information, approaches it nowhere so nearly as on the south side of

this river, where they have been found within ten miles of the sea.

This, however, is only of late occurrence. I am informed by some of

the oldest Mpongwe men that formerly he was only found on the sources

of the river, but that at present he may be found within half a day's

walk of its mouth. Formerly he inhabited the mountainous ridge where

Bushmen alone inhabited, but now he boldly approaches the Mpongwe

plantations. This is doubtless the reason of the scarcity of

information in years past, as the opportunities for receiving a

knowledge of the animal have not been wanting; traders having for one

hundred years frequented this river, and specimens, such as have been

brought here within a year, could not have been exhibited without

having attracted the attention of the most stupid."

One specimen Mr. Ford examined weighed one hundred and seventy pounds,

without the thoracic or pelvic viscera, and measured four feet four

inches round the chest. This writer describes so minutely and

graphically the onslaught of the Gorilla--though he does not for a

moment pretend to have witnessed the scene--that I am tempted to give

this part of his paper in full, for comparison with other narratives.

"He always rises to his feet when making an attack, though he

approaches his antagonist in a stooping posture.

"Though he never lies in wait, yet, when he hears, sees, or scents a

man, he immediately utters his characteristic cry, prepares for an

attack, and always acts on the offensive. The cry he utters resembles

a grunt more than a growl, and is similar to the cry of the Chimpanzee

when irritated, but vastly louder. It is said to be audible at a great

distance. His preparation consists in attending the females and young

ones, by whom he is usually accompanied, to a little distance. He,

however, soon returns with his crest erect and projecting forward, his

nostrils dilated, and his under-lip thrown down; at the same time

uttering his characteristic yell, designed, it would seem, to terrify

his antagonist. Instantly, unless he is disabled by a well-directed

shot, he makes an onset, and, striking his antagonist with the palm of

his hands, or seizing him with a grasp from which there is no escape,

he dashes him upon the ground, and lacerates him with his tusks.

"He is said to seize a musket, and instantly crush the barrel between

his teeth.... This animal's savage nature is very well shown by the

implacable desperation of a young one that was brought here. It was

taken very young, and kept four months, and many means were used to

tame it; but it was incorrigible, so that it bit me an hour before it

died."

[Illustration: HAND OF GORILLA, ORANG, GIBBON, AND CHIMPANZEE.]

SOME STRANGE NURSERIES

(FROM NATURE'S WORKSHOP.)

BY GRANT ALLEN.

[Illustration]

You could hardly find a better rough test of relative development in

the animal (or vegetable) world than the number of young produced and

the care bestowed upon them. The fewer the offspring, the higher the

type. Very low animals turn out thousands of eggs with reckless

profusion; but they let them look after themselves, or be devoured by

enemies, as chance will have it. The higher you go in the scale of

being, the smaller the families, but the greater amount of pains

expended upon the rearing and upbringing of the young. Large broods

mean low organization; small broods imply higher types and more care

in the nurture and education of the offspring. Primitive kinds produce

eggs wholesale, on the off chance that some two or three among them

may perhaps survive an infant mortality of ninety-nine per cent, so as

to replace their parents. Advanced kinds produce half a dozen young,

or less, but bring a large proportion of these on an average up to

years of discretion.

[Illustration: SEA-HORSES.]

Without taking into account insects and such other "small deer,"--to

quote Shakespeare's expression,--this fundamental principle of

population will become at once apparent if we examine merely familiar

instances of back-boned or vertebrate animals. The lowest vertebrates

are clearly the fishes: and the true fishes have almost invariably

gigantic families. A single cod, for example, is said to produce,

roughly speaking, nine million eggs at a birth (I cannot pretend I

have checked this calculation); but supposing they were only a

million, and that one-tenth of those eggs alone ever came to maturity,

there would still be a hundred thousand codfish in the sea this year

for every pair that swam in it last year: and these would increase to

a hundred thousand times that number next year; and so on, till in

four or five years' time the whole sea would be but one solid mass of

closely-packed cod-banks. We can see for ourselves that nothing of the

sort actually occurs--practically speaking, there are about the same

number of cod one year as another. In spite of this enormous

birth-rate, therefore, the cod population is not increasing--it is at

a standstill. What does that imply? Why, that taking one brood and one

year with another, only a pair of cod, roughly speaking, survive to

maturity out of each eight or nine million eggs. The mother cod lays

its millions, in order that two may arrive at the period of spawning.

All the rest get devoured as eggs, or snapped up as young fry, or else

die of starvation, or are otherwise unaccounted for. It seems to us a

wasteful way of replenishing the earth: but it is nature's way; we can

only bow respectfully to her final decision.

Frogs and other amphibians stand higher in the scale of life than

fish; they have acquired legs in place of fins, and lungs instead of

gills; they can hop about on shore with perfect freedom. Now, frogs

still produce a great deal of spawn, as every one knows: but the eggs

in each brood are numbered in their case by hundreds, or at most by a

thousand or two, not by millions as with many fishes. The spawn

hatches out as a rule in ponds, and we have all seen the little black

tadpoles crowding the edges of the water in such innumerable masses

that one would suppose the frogs to be developed from them must cover

the length and breadth of England. Yet what becomes of them all?

Hundreds are destroyed in the early tadpole stage--eaten up or

starved, or crowded out for want of air and space and water: a few

alone survive or develop four legs, and absorb their tails and hop on

shore as tiny froglings. Even then the massacre of the innocents

continues. Only a tithe of those which succeeded in quitting their

native pond ever return to it full grown, to spawn in due time, and

become the parents of further generations.

Lizards and other reptiles make an obvious advance on the frog type;

they lay relatively few eggs, but they begin to care for their young.

The family is not here abandoned at birth, as among frogs, but is

frequently tended and fed and overlooked by the mother. In birds we

have a still higher development of the same marked parental tendency;

only three or four eggs are laid each year, as a rule, and on these

eggs the mother sits, while both parents feed the callow nestlings

till such time as they are able to take care of themselves and pick

up their own living. Among mammals, which stand undoubtedly at the

head of created nature, the lower types, like mice and rabbits, have

frequent broods of many young at a time; but the more advanced groups,

such as the horses, cows, deer, and elephants, have usually one foal

or calf at a birth, and seldom produce more than a couple. Moreover,

in all these higher cases alike, the young are fed with milk by the

mother, and so spared the trouble of providing for themselves in their

early days, like the young codfish or the baby tadpole. Starvation at

the outset is reduced to a minimum.

It is interesting to note, too, that anticipations of higher types, so

to speak, often occur among lower races. An animal here and there

among the simpler forms hits upon some device essentially similar to

that of some higher group with which it is really quite unrelated. For

example, those who have read my account of the common earwig (given in

the sixth chapter of "Flashlights on Nature") will recollect how that

lowly insect sits on her eggs much as a hen does, and brings up her

brood of callow grubs as if they were chickens. In much the same way,

anticipations of the mammalian type occur pretty frequently among

lower animals. Our commonest English lizard, for example, which

frequents moors and sandhills, does not lay or deposit its eggs at

all, but hatches them out in its own body, and so apparently brings

them forth alive: while among snakes, the same habit occurs in the

adder or viper. The very name _viper_, indeed, is a corruption of

_vivipara_, the snake which produces living young. Still more closely

do some birds resemble mammals in the habit of secreting a sort of

milk for the sustenance of their nestlings. Most people think the

phrase "pigeon's milk" is much like the phrase "the horse-marines," a

burlesque name for an absurd and impossible monstrosity. But it is

nothing of the sort: it answers to a real fact in the economy of

certain doves, which eat grain or seeds, grind and digest it in their

own gizzards into a fine soft pulp or porridge, and then feed their

young with it from their crops and beaks. This is thus a sort of

bird-like imitation of milk. Only the cow or the goat takes grass or

leaves, chews, swallows, and digests them, and manufactures from them

in her own body that much more nutritive substance, milk, with which

all mammals feed their infant offspring.

Now, after this rather long preamble, I am going to show you in this

present article a few other examples of special care taken of the

young in certain quarters where it might be least expected. Fish are

not creatures from which we look for marked domestic virtues: yet we

may find them there abundantly. Let us begin with that familiar friend

of our childhood, the common English stickleback.

Which of us cannot look back in youth to the mysteries of the

stickleback fisheries? Captains courageous, we sailed forth with bent

pin and piece of thread, to woo the wily quarry with half an inch of

chopped earthworm. For stickleback abound in every running stream and

pond in England. They are beautiful little creatures, too, when you

come to examine them, great favorites in the fresh-water aquarium; the

male in particular is exquisitely colored, his hues growing brighter

and his sheen more conspicuous at the pairing season. There are many

species of sticklebacks--in England we have three very different

kinds--but all are alike in one point which gives them their common

name, that is to say, in their aggressive and protective prickliness.

They are armed against all comers. The dorsal fin is partly replaced

in the whole family by strong spines or "stickles," which differ in

number in the different species. One of our English sorts is a lover

of salt water: he lives in the sea, especially off the Cornish coast,

and has fifteen stickles or spines; on which account he is commonly

known as the Fifteen-spined Stickleback; our other two sorts belong to

fresher waters, and are known as the Ten-spined and the Three-spined

respectively.

The special peculiarity of the male stickleback consists in the fact

that he is, above all things, a model father. In his acute sense of

parental responsibility he has few equals. When spring comes round, he

first exhibits his consciousness of his coming charge by suddenly

enduing himself in a glowing coat of many colors and of iridescent

brilliancy. That is in order to charm the eyes of the prospective

mate, or rather mates, for I may as well confess the sad truth at once

that our amiable friend is a good parent but an abandoned polygamist.

We all know that

"In the spring a fuller crimson comes upon the robin's breast;

In the spring the wanton lapwing gets himself another crest;

In the spring a livelier iris changes on the burnish'd dove;

In the spring a young man's fancy lightly turns to thoughts of love."

Not to be out of the fashion, therefore, the romantic stickleback does

precisely the same thing as all these distinguished and poetical

compeers. And he does it for the same reason, too; because he wants to

get himself an appropriate partner. "There is a great deal of human

nature in man," it has been said: I am always inclined to add, "And

there is a great deal of human nature in plants and animals." The more

we know of our dumb relations, the more closely do we realize the

kinship between us. Fish in the spring are like young men at a

fair--all eager for the attention of their prospective partners.

[Illustration: NO. 1. FEMALE STICKLEBACK ABOUT TO ENTER NEST.]

The first care of the male stickleback, when he has acquired his

courting suit, is to build a suitable home for his future wives and

children. So he picks up stems of grass and water-weeds with his

mouth, and weaves them deftly into a compact nest as perfect as a

bird's, though some what different in shape and pattern, it rather

resembles a barrel, open at both ends, as though the bottom were

knocked out: this form is rendered necessary because the eggs, when

laid, have to be constantly aerated by passing a current of water

through the nest as I shall describe hereafter. No. 1 shows us such a

nest when completed, with the female stickleback loitering about

undecided as to whether or not she shall plunge and enter it. You

will observe that the fabric is woven round a fixed support of some

waving water-weeds; but the cunning little architect does not trust in

this matter to his textile skill alone; he cements the straws and

other materials together with a gummy mortar of mucous threads

secreted for the purpose by his internal organs.

[Illustration: NO. 2. FEMALE STICKLEBACK LAYING EGGS IN NEST.]

As soon as the building operations are fully completed, the eager

little householder sallies forth into his pond or brook in search of

a mate who will come and stock his neatly-built home for him. At this

stage of the proceedings, his wedding-garment becomes even more

brilliant and glancing than ever; he gleams in silver and changeful

gems; when he finds his lady-love, he dances round her, "mad with

excitement," as Darwin well phrased it, looking his handsomest and

best with his lustrous colours glistening like an opal. If she will

listen to his suit, he grows wild with delight, and coaxes her into

the nest with most affectionate endearments. In No. 2, as you

perceive, the mate of his choice has been induced to enter, and is

laying her eggs in the dainty home his care has provided for her. The

father fish, meanwhile dances and capers around, in a _pas de

triomphe_ at the success of his endeavors.

One wife, however, does not suffice to fill the nest with eggs; and

the stickleback is a firm believer in the advantages of large

families. So, as soon as his first mate has laid all her spawn, he

sets out once more in search of another. Thus he goes on until the

home is quite full of eggs, bringing back one wife after another, in

proportion to his success in wooing and fighting. For, like almost all

polygamists, your stickleback is a terrible fighter. The males join

wager of battle with one another for possession of their mates; in

their fierce duels they make fearful use of the formidable spines on

their backs, sometimes entirely ripping up and cutting to pieces their

ill-fated adversary. The spines thus answer to the spurs of the

gamecock or the antlers of the deer; they are masculine weapons in the

struggle for mates. Indeed, you may take it for granted that brilliant

colors and decorative adjuncts in animals almost invariably go with

irascible tempers, pugnacious habits, and the practice of fighting for

the possession of the harem. The consequence is, with the

sticklebacks, that many males get killed during the struggle for

supremacy, so that the survivors wed half a dozen wives each, like

little Turks that they are in their watery seraglios. Only the most

beautiful and courageous fish succeed in gaining a harem of their own:

and thus the wager of battle tells in the end for the advantage of the

race, by eliminating the maimed, the ugly, and the cowardly, and

encouraging the strong, the handsome, the enterprising, and the

valiant. This is nature's way of preventing degeneracy.

In No. 3 the nest is seen full of eggs, and the excellent father now

comes out in his best light as their guardian and protector. He

watches over them with ceaseless care, freeing them from parasites,

and warding off the attacks of would-be enemies who desire to devour

them, even though the intruder be several times his own size. The

spines on his back here stand him once more in good stead: for small

as he is, the stickleback is not an antagonist to be lightly despised:

he can inflict a wound which a perch or a trout knows how to estimate

at its full value. But that is not all the good parent's duty. He

takes the eggs out of the nest every now and then with his snout, airs

them a little in the fresh water outside, and then replaces and

rearranges them, so that all may get a fair share of oxygen and may

hatch out about simultaneously. It is this question of oxygen, indeed,

which gives the father fish all the greatest trouble. That necessary

of life is dissolved in water in very small quantities; and it is

absolutely needed by every egg in order to enable it to undergo those

vital changes which we know as hatching. To keep up a due supply of

oxygen, therefore, the father stickleback ungrudgingly devotes

laborious days in poising himself delicately just above the nest, as

you see in No. 3, and fanning the eggs with his fins and tail, so as

to set up a constant current of water through the centre of the

barrel. He sits upon the eggs just as truly as a hen does; only, he

sits upon them, not for warmth, but for aeration.

[Illustration: NO. 3. MALE STICKLEBACK WATCHING EGGS IN NEST.]

For weeks together this exemplary parent continues his monotonous

task, ventilating the spawn many times every day, till the time comes

for hatching. It takes about a month for the eggs to develop: and then

the proud father's position grows more arduous than ever. He has to

rock a thousand cradles at once, so to speak, and to pacify a thousand

crying babies. On the one hand, enemies hover about, trying to eat the

tender transparent glass-like little fry, and these he must drive off:

on the other hand, the good nurse must take care that the active young

fish do not stray far from the nest, and so expose themselves

prematurely to the manifold dangers of the outer world. Till they are

big enough to take care of themselves, he watches with incessant

vigilance over their safety; as soon as they can go forth with

tolerable security upon the world of their brook or pond, he takes a

last well-merited holiday.

It is not surprising under these circumstances to learn that

sticklebacks are successful and increasing animals. Their numbers are

enormous, wherever they get a fair chance in life, because they

multiply rapidly up to the extreme limit of the means of subsistence,

and develop as fast as food remains for them. There the inexorable

Malthusian law at last steps in: when there is not food enough for all

some must starve; that is the long and the short of the great

population question. But while provender is forthcoming they increase

gayly. Sticklebacks live mainly on the spawn of other fish, though

they are so careful of their own, and they are therefore naturally

hated by trout-preservers and owners of fisheries in general.

Thousands and thousands are caught each year; in some places, indeed,

they are so numerous that they are used as manure. It is their

numbers, of course, that make them formidable; they are the locusts of

the streams, well armed and pugnacious, and provided with most

remarkable parental instincts of a protective character, which enables

them to fill up all vacancies in their ranks as fast as they occur

with astonishing promptitude.

To those whose acquaintance with fish is mainly culinary, it may seem

odd to hear that the father stickleback alone takes part in the care

of the nursery. But this is the rule among the whole class of fish;

wherever the young are tended, it is almost always the father, not the

mother, who undertakes the duty of incubation. Only two instances

occur where the female fish assumes maternal functions towards her

young; about these I shall have more to say a little later on. We must

remember that reptiles, birds, and mammals are in all probability

descended from fish as ancestors, and it is therefore clear that the

habit of handing over the care of the young to the female alone

belongs to the higher grades of vertebrates--in other words, is of

later origin. We need not be astonished, therefore, to find that in

many cases among birds and other advanced vertebrates a partial

reversion to the earlier habit not infrequently takes place. With

doves, for example, the cock and hen birds sit equally on the eggs,

taking turns about at the nest; and as for the ostriches, the male

bird there does most of the incubation, for he accepts the whole of

the night duty, and also assists at intervals during the daytime.

There are numerous other cases where the father bird shares the tasks

of the nursery at least equally with the mother. I will glance first,

however, at one of the rare exceptions among fish where the main duty

does not devolve on the devoted father.

[Illustration: NO. 4. FEMALE TUBE-MOUTH.]

A Book of Natural History Young Folks' Library Volume XIV. · 第 3 / 24 段