THE DUCKS OF AMERICA.

Lucien now continued his "monograph" of the American ducks.

"There are," said he, "more than two dozen species of ducks on the

waters of North America. These the systematists have divided into no

less than _eighteen genera_! Why it would be more easy to learn all

that ever was known about all the ducks in creation, than to remember

the eighteen generic names which these gentlemen have invented and put

forward. Moreover, the habits of any two species of these ducks are

more similar than those of any two kinds of dogs. Why then, I should

ask--why this complication? It is true that the ducks do not resemble

each other in every thing. Some species are fonder of water than

others. Some feed entirely upon vegetable substances; others upon small

fish, insects, crustacea, etcetera. Some live entirely in the sea;

others make their home in the freshwater lakes and rivers, while many

species dwell indifferently, either in salt or fresh waters. Some love

the open wave; others the sedgy marsh; while one or two species roost

upon trees, and build their nests in the hollow trunks. Notwithstanding

all this, there is such a similarity in the appearance and habits of the

different species, that I think the systematists have improved but

little, if anything, upon the simple arrangement of the true naturalist

Wilson, who--poor Scotch _emigre_ as he was, with an empty purse and a

loaded gun--has collected more original information about the birds of

America than all that have followed him. He described the ducks of

America under the single genus _Anas_; and, in my opinion, described

them in a more intelligent and intelligible manner than any one has done

since his time--not even excepting another great and true naturalist,

whose career has been longer, more successful, and happier; and whose

fame, in consequence of his better fortune, has become, perhaps, higher

and more extended.

"The water-fowl of America," continued Lucien--"I mean the swans, geese,

and ducks, are of great importance in the fur countries where we are now

travelling. At certain seasons of the year, in many parts, they furnish

almost the only article of food that can be procured. They are all

migratory--that is, when the lakes and rivers of these regions become

frozen over in the winter they all migrate southward, but return again

to breed and spend the summer. They do this, perhaps, because these

wild territories afford them a better security during the season of

incubation, and afterwards of moulting. It is not very certain,

however, that this is the reason, and for my part I am inclined to think

not, for there are also wild, uninhabited territories enough in southern

latitudes, and yet they forsake these and migrate north in the spring.

`Their arrival in the fur countries,' writes a distinguished naturalist,

`marks the commencement of spring, and diffuses as much joy among the

wandering hunters of the Arctic regions, as the harvest or vintage

excites in more genial climes.' Both by the Indians and hunters in the

employ of the Hudson's Bay Company swans, geese, and ducks, are

slaughtered by thousands, and are eaten not only when fresh killed, but

they are salted in large quantities, and so preserved for winter use,

when fresh ones can no longer be procured. Of course, both Indian and

white hunters use all their art in killing or capturing them; and to

effect this they employ many different methods, as decoying, snaring,

netting, and shooting them: but Cousin Norman here could give a better

description of all these things than I. Perhaps he will favour us with

some account of them."

"The Indians," said the young trader, taking up the subject without

hesitation, "usually snare them. Their most common way is to make a

number of hedges or wattle fences projecting into the water at right

angles to the edge of the lake, or, it may be, river. These fences are

two or three yards apart, and between each two there is, of course, an

opening, into which the birds swim, as they make towards the shore for

their food. In these openings, then, the snares are set and tied so

firmly to a post stuck in the bottom, that the birds, whether ducks,

geese, or swans, when caught, may not be able to drag it away. To keep

the snare in its place, it is secured to the wattles of the fence with

tender strands of grass, that of course give way the moment the fowl

becomes entangled. The snares are made out of deer sinews, twisted like

packthread, and sometimes of thongs cut from a `parchment' deerskin,

which, as you know, is a deerskin simply dried, and not tanned or

dressed. The making of the fences is the part that gives most trouble.

Sometimes the timber for the stakes is not easily had; and even when it

is plenty, it is no easy matter to drive the stakes into the bottom and

wattle them, while seated in a vessel so crank as a birch canoe.

Sometimes, in the rivers where the water-fowl most frequent, the current

is swift, and adds to this trouble. Where the lakes and rivers are

shallow, the thing becomes easier; and I have seen small lakes and

rivers fenced in this way from shore to shore. In large lakes this

would not be necessary, as most of the water-birds--such as the swans

and geese--and all the ducks that are not of the diving kinds, are sure

to come to the shore to feed, and are more likely to be taken close in

to land than out in the open water.

"The Indians often snare these birds upon the nest, and they always wash

their hands before setting the snare. They have a notion--I don't know

whether true or not--that if their hands are not clean, the birds can

smell the snare, and will be shy of going into it. They say that all

these birds--and I believe it's true of all fowls that make their nests

upon the ground--go into the nest at one side, and out at the opposite.

The Indians knowing this, always set their snares at the side where the

bird enters, and by this they are more sure of catching them, and also

of getting them some hours sooner.

"Besides snaring the water-fowl," continued Norman, "the Indians

sometimes catch them in nets, and sometimes on hooks baited with

whatever the birds are known to eat. They also shoot them as the white

hunters do, and to get near enough use every sort of cunning that can be

thought of. Sometimes they decoy them within shot, by putting wooden

ducks on the water near their cover, where they themselves are

stationed. Sometimes they disguise their canoes under brushwood, and

paddle to the edge of the flock; and when the moulting season comes

round, they pursue them through the water, and kill them with sticks.

The swans, when followed in this way, often escape. With their strong

wings and great webbed feet, they can flap faster over the surface than

a canoe can follow them. I have heard of many other tricks which the

Indians of different tribes make use of, but I have only seen these ways

I have described, besides the one we have just witnessed."

Norman was one of your practical philosophers, who did not choose to

talk much of things with which he was not thoroughly acquainted.

Lucien now took up the thread of the conversation, and gave some further

information about the different species of American ducks.

"One of the most celebrated," said he, "is the `eider-duck' (_Anas

mollissima_). This is prized for its down, which is exceedingly soft

and fine, and esteemed of great value for lining quilts and making beds

for the over-luxurious. It is said that three pounds' weight of `eider

down' can be compressed to the size of a man's fist, and yet is

afterwards so dilatable as to fill a quilt of five feet square. The

down is generally obtained without killing the bird, for that which is

plucked from dead birds is far inferior, and has lost much of its

elasticity. The mode of procuring it is to steal it from the nest, in

the absence of the birds. The female lines the nest with down plucked

from her own breast. When this is stolen from her, by those who gather

the commodity, she plucks out a second crop of it, and arranges it as

before. This being also removed, it is said that the male bird then

makes a sacrifice of his downy waistcoat, and the nest is once more put

in order; but should this too be taken, the birds forsake their nest

never to return to it again. The quantity of `eider down' found in a

single nest is sufficient to fill a man's hat, and yet it will weigh

only about three ounces.

"The eider-duck is about the size of the common mallard, or wild duck

proper. Its colour is black below, and buff-white on the back, neck,

and shoulders, while the forehead is bluish black. It is one of the

`sea-ducks,' or _fuligulae_, as the naturalists term them, and it is

rarely seen in fresh water. Its food is principally the soft mollusca

common in the Arctic seas, and its flesh is not esteemed except by the

Greenlanders. It is at home only in the higher latitudes of both

Continents, and loves to dwell upon the rocky shores of the sea; but in

very severe winters, it makes its appearance along the Atlantic coast of

the United States, where it receives different names from the gunners--

such as `black-and-white coot,' `big sea-duck,' `shoal-duck,' and

`squaw-duck;' and under these titles it is often sold in the markets of

American cities. Some suppose that the eider-duck could be easily

domesticated. If so, it would, no doubt, prove a profitable as well as

an interesting experiment; but I believe it has already been attempted

without success. It is in the countries of Northern Europe where the

gathering of the eider down has been made an object of industry. On the

American Continent the pursuit is not followed, either by the native or

white settler.

"Another species common to the higher latitudes of both Continents is

the `king-duck,' so called from its very showy appearance. Its habits

are very similar to the `eider,' and its down is equally soft and

valuable, but it is a smaller bird.

"A still smaller species, also noted for its brilliant plumage, inhabits

the extreme north of both continents. This is the `harlequin-duck;' or,

as the early colonists term it, the `lord.'

"But the `wood-duck' (_Anas sponsa_) is perhaps the most beautiful of

all the American species, or indeed of all ducks whatever--although it

has a rival in the _mandarin duck_ of China, which indeed it very much

resembles both in size and markings. The wood-duck is so called from

the fact of its making its nest in hollow trees, and roosting

occasionally on the branches. It is a freshwater duck, and a Southern

species--never being seen in very high latitudes; nor is it known in

Europe in a wild state, but is peculiar to the Continent of America. It

is one of the easiest species to domesticate, and no zoological garden

is now without it; in all of which its small size--being about that of a

widgeon--its active movements and innocent look, its musical

_peet-peet_, and, above all, its beautiful plumage, make it a general

favourite.

"Besides these, there are many others of the American ducks, whose

description would interest you, but you would grow tired were I to give

a detailed account of them all; so I shall only mention a few that are

distinguished by well-known peculiarities. There is the `whistler'

(_Anas clangula_), which takes its trivial name from the whistling sound

of its wings while in flight; and the `shoveller,' so called from the

form of its bill; and the `conjuring,' or `spirit' ducks of the Indians

(_Anas vulgaris_ and _albeola_), because they dive so quickly and

dexterously, that it is almost impossible to shoot them either with bow

or gun. There is the `old wife,' or `old squaw' (_Anas glacialis_), so

called from its incessant cackle, which the hunters liken to the

scolding of an ill-tempered old wife. This species is the most noisy of

all the duck tribe, and is called by the voyageurs `caccawee,' from its

fancied utterance of these syllables; and the sound, so often heard in

the long nights of the fur countries, has been woven into and forms the

burden of many a voyageur's song. In some parts of the United States

the caccawee is called `south-southerly,' as its voice is there thought

to resemble this phrase, while at the time when most heard--the autumn--

these ducks are observed flying in a southerly direction.

"Besides these," continued Lucien, "there are the teals--blue and

green-winged--and the coots, and the widgeon--slightly differing from

the widgeon of Europe--and there is the rare and beautiful little ruddy

duck (_Anas rubida_), with its bright mahogany colour--its long upright

tail and short neck--that at a distance give it the appearance of a duck

with two heads. And there is the well-known `pintail,' and the

`pochard' or `red-head;' and the `mallard,' from which comes the common

domestic variety, and the `scoter,' and `surf,' and `velvet,' and

`dusky,' ducks--these last four being all, more or less, of a dark

colour. And there are the `shell-drakes,' or `fishers,' that swim low

in the water, dive and fly well, but walk badly, and feed altogether on

fish. These, on account of their toothed bills, form a genus of

themselves--the `mergansers,'--and four distinct species of them are

known in America."

The approach of night, and the necessity of landing, to make their night

camp, brought Lucien's lecture to a close. Indeed Francois was glad

when it ended, for he was beginning to think it somewhat tedious.

The Young Voyageurs: Boy Hunters in the North · 第 44 / 83 题