AT ARLINGTON, MEMORIAL DAY, MAY 30, 1902

_Mr. Commander; Comrades; and you, the men and women of the United

States who owe your being here to what was done by the men of the

great Civil War_:

I greet you, and thank you for the honor done me in asking me to

be present this day. It is a good custom for our country to have

certain solemn holidays in commemoration of our greatest men and

of the greatest crises in our history. There should be but few such

holidays. To increase their number is to cheapen them. Washington

and Lincoln—the man who did most to found the Union, and the man

who did most to preserve it—stand head and shoulders above all our

other public men, and have by common consent won the right to this

preëminence. Among the holidays which commemorate the turning points

in American history, Thanksgiving has a significance peculiarly its

own. On July 4 we celebrate the birth of the nation; on this day,

the 30th of May, we call to mind the deaths of those who died that

the nation might live, who wagered all that life holds dear for the

great prize of death in battle, who poured out their blood like water

in order that the mighty national structure raised by the far-seeing

genius of Washington, Franklin, Marshall, Hamilton, and the other

great leaders of the Revolution, great framers of the Constitution,

should not crumble into meaningless ruins.

You whom I address to-day and your comrades who wore the blue beside

you in the perilous years during which strong, sad, patient Lincoln

bore the crushing load of national leadership, performed the one

feat the failure to perform which would have meant destruction to

everything which makes the name America a symbol of hope among the

nations of mankind. You did the greatest and most necessary task which

has ever fallen to the lot of any men on this Western Hemisphere.

Nearly three centuries have passed since the waters of our coasts were

first furrowed by the keels of those whose children’s children were to

inherit this fair land. Over a century and a half of colonial growth

followed the settlement; and now for over a century and a quarter we

have been a nation.

During our four generations of national life we have had to do many

tasks, and some of them of far-reaching importance; but the only

really vital task was the one you did, the task of saving the Union.

There were other crises in which to have gone wrong would have meant

disaster; but this was the one crisis in which to have gone wrong

would have meant not merely disaster but annihilation. For failure at

any other point atonement could have been made; but had you failed

in the iron days the loss would have been irreparable, the defeat

irretrievable. Upon your success depended all the future of the people

on this continent, and much of the future of mankind as a whole.

You left us a reunited country. You left us the right of brotherhood

with the men in gray, who with such courage, and such devotion for

what they deemed the right, fought against you. But you left us much

more even than your achievement, for you left us the memory of how

it was achieved. You, who made good by your valor and patriotism the

statesmanship of Lincoln and the soldiership of Grant, have set as

the standards for our efforts in the future both the way you did your

work in war and the way in which, when the war was over, you turned

again to the work of peace. In war and in peace alike your example

will stand as the wisest of lessons to us and our children and our

children’s children.

Just at this moment the Army of the United States, led by men who

served among you in the great war, is carrying to completion a small

but peculiarly trying and difficult war in which is involved not only

the honor of the flag but the triumph of civilization over forces

which stand for the black chaos of savagery and barbarism. The task

has not been as difficult or as important as yours, but, oh, my

comrades, the men in the uniform of the United States, who have for

the last three years patiently and uncomplainingly championed the

American cause in the Philippine Islands, are your younger brothers,

your sons. They have shown themselves not unworthy of you, and they

are entitled to the support of all men who are proud of what you did.

These younger comrades of yours have fought under terrible

difficulties and have received terrible provocation from a very cruel

and very treacherous enemy. Under the strain of these provocations

I deeply deplore to say that some among them have so far forgotten

themselves as to counsel and commit, in retaliation, acts of

cruelty. The fact that for every guilty act committed by one of our

troops a hundred acts of far greater atrocity have been committed

by the hostile natives upon our troops, or upon the peaceable and

law-abiding natives who are friendly to us, can not be held to excuse

any wrongdoers on our side. Determined and unswerving effort must be

made, and has been and is being made, to find out every instance of

barbarity on the part of our troops, to punish those guilty of it, and

to take, if possible, even stronger measures than have already been

taken to minimize or prevent the occurrence of all such acts in the

future.

Is it only in the army in the Philippines that Americans sometimes

commit deeds that cause all other Americans to regret? No! From time

to time there occur in our country, to the deep and lasting shame

of our people, lynchings carried on under circumstances of inhuman

cruelty and barbarity—cruelty infinitely worse than any that has ever

been committed by our troops in the Philippines; worse to the victims,

and far more brutalizing to those guilty of it. The men who fail to

condemn these lynchings, and yet clamor about what has been done in

the Philippines, are indeed guilty of neglecting the beam in their own

eye while taunting their brother about the mote in his. Understand me.

These lynchings afford us no excuse for failure to stop cruelty in the

Philippines. But keep in mind that these cruelties in the Philippines

have been wholly exceptional, and have been shamelessly exaggerated.

We deeply and bitterly regret that they should have been committed,

no matter how rarely, no matter under what provocation, by American

troops. But they afford far less ground for a general condemnation

of our army than these lynchings afford for the condemnation of the

communities in which they occur. In each case it is well to condemn

the deed, and it is well also to refrain from including both guilty

and innocent in the same sweeping condemnation.

In every community there are people who commit acts of wellnigh

inconceivable horror and baseness. If we fix our eyes only upon

these individuals and upon their acts, and if we forget the far more

numerous citizens of upright and honest life and blind ourselves to

their countless deeds of wisdom and justice and philanthropy, it is

easy enough to condemn the community. There is not a city in this

land which we could not thus condemn if we fixed our eyes solely upon

its police record and refused to look at what it had accomplished for

decency and justice and charity. Yet this is exactly the attitude

which has been taken by too many men with reference to our army in the

Philippines; and it is an attitude iniquitous in its absurdity and its

injustice.

The rules of warfare which have been promulgated by the War Department

and accepted as the basis of conduct by our troops in the field are

the rules laid down by Abraham Lincoln when you, my hearers, were

fighting for the Union. These rules provide, of course, for the

just severity necessary in war. The most destructive of all forms

of cruelty would be to show weakness where sternness is demanded by

iron need. But all cruelty is forbidden, and all harshness beyond

what is called for by need. Our enemies in the Philippines have not

merely violated every rule of war, but have made of these violations

their only method of carrying on the war. Think over that! It is not a

rhetorical statement—it is a bald statement of contemporary history.

They have been able to prolong the war at all only by recourse to

acts each one of which put them beyond the pale of civilized warfare.

We would have been justified by Abraham Lincoln’s rules of war in

infinitely greater severity than has been shown.

The fact really is that our warfare in the Philippines has been

carried on with singular humanity. For every act of cruelty by our

men there have been innumerable acts of forbearance, magnanimity, and

generous kindness. These are the qualities which have characterized

the war as a whole. The cruelties on our part have been wholly

exceptional.

The guilty are to be punished; but in punishing them, let those who

sit at ease at home, who walk delicately and live in the soft places

of the earth, remember also to do them common justice. Let not the

effortless and the untempted rail overmuch at strong men who with

blood and sweat face years of toil and days of agony, and at need

lay down their lives in remote tropic jungles to bring the light

of civilization into the world’s dark places. The warfare that has

extended the boundaries of civilization at the expense of barbarism

and savagery has been for centuries one of the most potent factors in

the progress of humanity. Yet from its very nature it has always and

everywhere been liable to dark abuses.

It behooves us to keep a vigilant watch to prevent these abuses and to

punish those who commit them; but if because of them we flinch from

finishing the task on which we have entered, we show ourselves cravens

and weaklings, unworthy of the sires from whose loins we sprang. Oh,

my comrades, how the men of the present tend to forget not merely

what was done but what was spoken in the past! There were abuses and

to spare in the Civil War; and slander enough, too, by each side

against the other. Your false friends then called Grant a “butcher”

and spoke of you who are listening to me as mercenaries, as “Lincoln’s

hirelings.” Your open foes—as in the resolution passed by the

Confederate Congress in October, 1862—accused you, at great length,

and with much particularity, of “contemptuous disregard of the usages

of civilized war;” of subjecting women and children to “banishment,

imprisonment, and death;” of “murder,” of “rapine,” of “outrages on

women,” of “lawless cruelty,” of “perpetrating atrocities which would

be disgraceful in savages;” and Abraham Lincoln was singled out for

especial attack because of his “spirit of barbarous ferocity.” Verily,

these men who thus foully slandered you have their heirs to-day in

those who traduce our armies in the Philippines, who fix their eyes on

individual deeds of wrong so keenly that at last they become blind to

the great work of peace and freedom that has already been accomplished.

Peace and freedom—are there two better objects for which a soldier can

fight? Well, these are precisely the objects for which our soldiers

are fighting in the Philippines. When there is talk of the cruelties

committed in the Philippines, remember always that by far the greater

proportion of these cruelties have been committed by the insurgents

against their own people—as well as against our soldiers—and that not

only the surest but the only effectual way of stopping them is by the

progress of the American arms. The victories of the American Army have

been the really effective means of putting a stop to cruelty in the

Philippines. Wherever these victories have been complete—and such is

now the case throughout the greater part of the islands—all cruelties

have ceased, and the native is secure in his life, his liberty, and

his pursuit of happiness. Where the insurrection still smoulders there

is always a chance for cruelty to show itself.

Our soldiers conquer; and what is the object for which they

conquer? To establish a military government? No. The laws we are

now endeavoring to enact for the government of the Philippines are

to increase the power and domain of the civil at the expense of the

military authorities, and to render even more difficult than in the

past the chance of oppression. The military power is used to secure

peace, in order that it may itself be supplanted by the civil power.

The progress of the American arms means the abolition of cruelty,

the bringing of peace, and the rule of law and order under the civil

government. Other nations have conquered to create irresponsible

military rule. We conquer to bring just and responsible civil

government to the conquered.

But our armies do more than bring peace, do more than bring order.

They bring freedom. Remember always that the independence of a tribe

or a community may, and often does, have nothing whatever to do with

the freedom of the individual in that tribe or community. There are

now in Asia and Africa scores of despotic monarchies, each of which is

independent, and in no one of which is there the slightest vestige of

freedom for the individual man. Scant indeed is the gain to mankind

from the “independence” of a blood-stained tyrant who rules over

abject and brutalized slaves. But great is the gain to humanity which

follows the steady though slow introduction of the orderly liberty,

the law-abiding freedom of the individual, which is the only sure

foundation upon which national independence can be built. Wherever in

the Philippines the insurrection has been definitely and finally put

down, there the individual Filipino already enjoys such freedom, such

personal liberty under our rule, as he could never even have dreamed

of under the rule of an “independent” Aguinaldian oligarchy.

The slowly-learned and difficult art of self-government, an art

which our people have taught themselves by the labor of a thousand

years, can not be grasped in a day by a people only just emerging

from conditions of life which our ancestors left behind them in the

dim years before history dawned. We believe that we can rapidly teach

the people of the Philippine Islands not only how to enjoy but how

to make good use of their freedom; and with their growing knowledge

their growth in self-government shall keep steady pace. When they

have thus shown their capacity for real freedom by their power of

self-government, then, and not till then, will it be possible to

decide whether they are to exist independently of us or be knit to us

by ties of common friendship and interest. When that day will come

it is not in human wisdom now to foretell. All that we can say with

certainty is that it would be put back an immeasurable distance if we

should yield to the counsels of unmanly weakness and turn loose the

islands, to see our victorious foes butcher with revolting cruelty

our betrayed friends, and shed the blood of the most humane, the most

enlightened, the most peaceful, the wisest and the best of their own

number—for these are the classes who have already learned to welcome

our rule.

Nor, while fully acknowledging our duties to others, need we wholly

forget our duty to ourselves. The Pacific seaboard is as much to us as

the Atlantic; as we grow in power and prosperity so our interests will

grow in that furthest west which is the immemorial east. The shadow

of our destiny has already reached to the shores of Asia. The might

of our people already looms large against the world-horizon; and it

will loom ever larger as the years go by. No statesman has a right to

neglect the interests of our people in the Pacific; interests which

are important to all our people, but of most importance to those of

our people who have built populous and thriving States to the west of

the great watershed of this continent.

This should no more be a party question than the war for the Union

should have been a party question. At this moment the man in highest

office in the Philippine Islands is the Vice-Governor, General Luke

Wright, of Tennessee, who gallantly wore the gray in the Civil War

and who is now working hand in hand with the head of our army in

the Philippines, Adna Chaffee, who in the Civil War gallantly wore

the blue. Those two, and the men under them, from the North and

from the South, in civil life and in military life, as teachers, as

administrators, as soldiers, are laboring mightily for us who live at

home. Here and there black sheep are to be found among them; but taken

as a whole they represent as high a standard of public service as this

country has ever seen. They are doing a great work for civilization,

a great work for the honor and the interest of this nation, and above

all for the welfare of the inhabitants of the Philippine Islands. All

honor to them; and shame, thrice shame, to us if we fail to uphold

their hands!

AT THE OPENING SESSION OF THE MILITARY SURGEONS’ ASSOCIATION,

WASHINGTON, D. C., JUNE 5, 1902

_Mr. President; Ladies and Gentlemen_:

I am glad to have the opportunity to bid welcome to the members of

this Association and their friends to-day. The men of your Association

combine two professions each of which is rightfully held in high honor

by all capable of appreciating the real work of men—the profession of

the soldier and the profession of the doctor. Conditions in modern

civilization tend more and more to make the average life of the

community one of great ease, compared to what has been the case in

the past. Together with what advantages have come from this softening

of life and rendering it more easy there are certain attendant

disadvantages. It is a very necessary thing that there should be some

professions, some trades, where the same demands are made now as ever

in the past upon the heroic qualities. Those demands are made alike

upon the soldier and upon the doctor; and more upon those who are

both soldiers and doctors, upon the men who have continually to face

all the responsibility, all the risk, faced by their brothers in the

civilian branch of the profession, and who also, in time of war, must

face much the same risks, often exactly the same risks, that are faced

by their brothers in arms whose trade is to kill and not to cure! It

has been my good fortune, gentlemen, to see some of your body at work

in the field, to see them carrying the wounded and the dying from the

firing-line, themselves as much exposed to danger as those they were

rescuing, and to see them working day and night in the field hospital

afterward when even the intensity of the strain could hardly keep them

awake, so fagged out were they by having each to do the work of ten.

I welcome you here, and I am glad to have the chance of seeing

you, and I wish to say a word of congratulation to you upon this

Association. In all our modern life we have found it absolutely

indispensable to supplement the work of the individual by the work of

the individuals gathered into an association. Without this work of

the association you can not give the highest expression to individual

endeavor, and it would be a great misfortune if the military members

of the surgical and medical profession did not take every advantage

of their opportunities in the same way that is taken by the members

of the medical and the surgical professions who are not in the army

or the navy or the marine hospital service—who are in civilian life

outside. I am glad to see you gathered in this association. Just

one word of warning: Pay all possible heed to the scientific side

of your work; perfect yourselves as scientific men able to work

with the best and most delicate apparatus; and never for one moment

forget—especially the higher officers among you—that in time of need

you will have to do your work with the scantiest possible apparatus!

and that then your usefulness will be conditioned not upon the

adequacy of the complaint that you did not have apparatus enough,

but upon what you have done with the insufficient apparatus you had.

Remember that and remember also—and this especially applies to the

higher officers—that you must supplement in your calling the work of

the surgeon with the work of the administrator. You must be doctors

and military men and able administrators.

AT THE CENTENNIAL CELEBRATION OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE UNITED

STATES MILITARY ACADEMY, WEST POINT, JUNE 11, 1902

_Colonel Mills, graduates of West Point, and you, the Men and Women

who are drawn to them by ties of kinship, or by the simple fact that

you are Americans, and therefore of necessity drawn to them_:

I am glad to have the chance of saying a word to you to-day. There

is little need for me to say how well your performance has squared

with the prophetic promise made on your behalf by the greatest of

Americans, Washington. This institution has completed its first

hundred years of life. During that century no other educational

institution in the land has contributed as many names as West Point to

the honor roll of the nation’s greatest citizens.

Colonel Mills, I claim to be a historian, and I speak simply in the

spirit of one, simply as a reciter of facts, when I say what I have

said. And more than that; not merely has West Point contributed a

greater number of the men who stand highest on the nation’s honor

roll, but I think beyond question that, taken as a whole, the average

graduate of West Point, during this hundred years, has given a greater

sum of service to the country through his life than has the average

graduate of any other institution in this broad land. Now, gentlemen,

that is not surprising. It is what we had a right to expect from this

Military University, founded by the nation. It is what we had a right

to expect, but I am glad that the expectation has been made good.

And of all the institutions in this country, none is more absolutely

American, none, in the proper sense of the word, more absolutely

democratic than this.

Here we care nothing for the boy’s birthplace, nor his creed, nor his

social standing; here we care nothing save for his worth as he is able

to show it. Here you represent with almost mathematical exactness all

the country geographically. You are drawn from every walk of life by

a method of choice made to ensure, and which in the great majority

of cases does ensure, that heed shall be paid to nothing save the

boy’s aptitude for the profession into which he seeks entrance. Here

you come together as representatives of America in a higher and more

peculiar sense than can possibly be true of any other institution in

the land, save your sister college that makes similar preparation for

the service of the country on the seas.

This morning I have shaken hands with many of you; and I have met the

men who stand as representatives of every great struggle, every great

forward movement this nation has made for the last fifty-five or sixty

years. There are some still left who took part in the Mexican War,

a struggle which added to this country a territory vaster than has

changed hands in Europe as the result of all the wars of the last two

centuries. I meet, when I see any of the older men among you, men who

took part in the great Civil War, when this nation was tried as in a

furnace; the men who were called upon to do the one deed which had to

be done under penalty of making the memory of Washington himself of

little account, because if you had failed, then failure would also

have been written across the record of his work. Finally, I see the

younger men as well as the older ones, the men whom I myself have

seen taking part in a little war—a war that was the merest skirmish

compared with the struggle in which you fought from ’61 to ’65, and

yet a war that has had most far-reaching effects, not merely upon

the destiny of this nation, but, therefore, upon the destiny of the

world—the war with Spain.

It was my good fortune to see in the campaign in Cuba how the

graduates of West Point handled themselves; to see and to endeavor

to profit by their example. It is a peculiar pleasure to come here

to-day, because I was at that time intimately associated with many of

these, your graduates, who are here. On the day before the San Juan

fight, when we were marched up into position, the officers with whom

I was, lost connection with the baggage and food, and I, for supper

that night, had what Colonel Mills gave me. And the next morning

Colonel Mills was with another West Pointer, gallant Shipp, of North

Carolina. The next morning we breakfasted together. I remember well

congratulating myself that my regiment, a raw volunteer regiment,

could have, to set it an example, men like Mills and Shipp, whose very

presence made the men cool, made them feel collected and at ease.

Mills and Shipp went with our regiment into action. Shortly after it

began Shipp was killed and Colonel Mills received a wound from which

no one of us at the time dreamed that he would recover. I had at that

time in my regiment, as acting second lieutenant, a cadet from West

Point. He was having his holiday; he took his holiday coming down

with us, and just before the assault he was shot, the bullet going, I

think, into the stomach, and coming out the other side. He fell, and

as we came up I leaned over him, and he said, “All right, Colonel, I

am going to get well.” I did not think he was, but I said, “All right,

I am sure you will,” and he did; he is all right now. There was never

a moment during that time, by day or by night, that I was not an

eyewitness to some performance of duty, some bit of duty well done, by

a West Pointer, and I never saw a West Pointer failing in his duty.

I want to be perfectly frank, gentlemen; I _heard_ of two or three

instances; you can not get in any body of men absolute uniformity of

good conduct; but I am happy to say that I never was an eyewitness to

such misconduct. It was my good fortune to see what is the rule, what

is the rule with only the rarest exception; the rule of duty done in

a way that makes a man proud to be an American, the fellow-citizen of

such Americans.

Your duty here at West Point has been to fit men to do well in war.

But it is a noteworthy fact that you also have fitted them to do

singularly well in peace. The highest positions in the land have been

held, not exceptionally, but again and again by West Pointers. West

Pointers have risen to the first rank in all the occupations of civil

life. Colonel Mills, I make the answer that a man who answers the

question must make when I say that, while we had a right to expect

that West Point would do well, we could not have expected that she

would do so well as she has done.

I want to say one word to those who are graduating here, and to the

undergraduates as well. I was greatly impressed the other day by an

article of one of your instructors, himself a West Pointer, in which

he dwelt upon the changed conditions of warfare, and the absolute need

that the man who was to be a good officer should meet those changed

conditions. I think it is going to be a great deal harder to be a

first-class officer in the future than it has been in the past. In

addition to the courage and steadfastness that have always been the

prime requirements in a soldier, you have got to show far greater

fertility of resource and far greater power of individual initiative

than has ever been necessary before if you are to come up to the

highest level of officer-like performance of duty.

As has been well said, the developments of warfare during the last

few years have shown that in the future the unit will not be the

regiment nor the company nor troop; the unit will be the individual

man. The army is to a very great extent going to do well or ill

according to the average of that individual man. If he does not know

how to shoot, how to shift for himself, how both to obey orders and to

accept responsibility when the emergency comes where he will not have

any orders to obey, if he is not able to do all of that, and if in

addition he has not got the fighting edge, you had better have him out

of the army; he will be a damage in it.

In a battle hereafter each man is going to be to a considerable extent

alone. The formation will be so open that the youngest officer will

have to take much of the responsibility that in former wars fell

on his seniors; and many of the enlisted men will have to do most

of their work without supervision from any officer whatsoever. The

man will have to act largely alone, and if he shows a tendency to

huddle up to somebody else his usefulness will be pretty near at an

end. He must draw on his own courage and resourcefulness to meet the

emergencies as they come up. It will be more difficult in the future

than ever before to know your profession, and more essential also; and

you officers, and you who are about to become officers, if you are

going to do well, have got to learn how to perform the duty which,

while become more essential, has become harder to perform.

You want to face the fact and realize more than ever before that the

honor or the shame of the country may depend upon the high average

of character and capacity of the officers and enlisted men, and that

a high average of character and capacity in the enlisted men can to

a large degree be obtained only through you, the officers; that you

must devote your time in peace to bringing up the standard of fighting

efficiency of the men under you, not merely in doing your duty so that

you can not be called to account for failure to perform it, but doing

it in a way that will make any man under you abler to perform his.

I noticed throughout the time that we were in Cuba that the orders

given and executed were of the simplest kind, and that there was

very little manœuvring, practically none of the manœuvring of the

parade-ground. Now, I want you to weigh what I say, for if you take

only half of it, you will invert it. I found out very soon in my

regiment that the best man was the man who had been in the Regular

Army in actual service, out in the West, campaigning on the plains; if

he had been a good man in the Regular Army in actual service on the

plains he was the best man that I could get hold of. On the other

hand, if he had merely served in time of peace a couple of years in

an Eastern garrison, where he did practically nothing outside of

parade grounds and barracks, or if he had been in an ordinary National

Guard regiment, then one of two things was true; if he understood

that he had only learned five per cent of war, he was five per cent

better than any one who had learned none of it, and that was a big

advance; but if he thought he had also learned the other ninety-five

per cent he was worse than any one else. I recollect perfectly one

man who had been a corporal in the Regular Army; this young fellow

joined us sure that he knew everything, confident that war consisted

in nice parade-ground manœuvres. It was almost impossible to turn his

attention from trying the very difficult task of making my cowpunchers

keep in a straight line, to the easier task of training them so that

they could do the most efficient fighting when the occasion arose. He

confused the essentials and the non-essentials. The non-essentials

are so pretty and so easy that it is a great temptation to think that

your duty lies in perfecting yourself and the men under you in them.

You have got to do that, too; but if you only do that you will not be

worth your salt when the day of trial comes.

Gentlemen, I do not intend to try here to preach to you upon the

performance of your duties. It has been your special business to

learn to do that. I do ask you to remember the difference there is

in the military profession now from what it has been in past time;

to remember that the final test of soldiership is not excellence in

parade-ground formation, but efficiency in actual service in the

field, and that the usefulness, the real and great usefulness in the

parade-ground and barracks work comes from its being used not as an

end, but as one of the means to an end. I ask you to remember that.

I do not have to ask you to remember what you can not forget—the

lessons of loyalty, of courage, of steadfast adherence to the highest

standards of honor and uprightness which all men draw in when they

breathe the atmosphere of this great institution.

Presidential addresses and state papers, Volume 1 (of 7) · 第 58 / 98 题