I. MEMOIR OF WILLIAM CRASHAW, B.D.

The late laborious and accurate Joseph Hunter, in his MS. collections

yclept Chorus Vatum, which by rare good fortune are preserved in the

British Museum (Addl. MSS. 24.487, pp. 34-39), thus begins, _s.n._

'I am here introducing a name which may be said to be hitherto unknown

in the regions of Poetry, and which has been unaccountably passed over

by biographical writers of every class; yet one who has just claims on

our attention of his own as well as in being the father of Richard

Crashaw, whose merits are admitted;' and he continues with a pleasant

egotism that one can readily pardon, 'and he has particular claims upon

me, as having been a native of the part of the kingdom from which I

spring, and bearing a name which is that of a numerous family from whom

I descend.'

We shall find onward, that the elder Crashaw had a unique gift of

Poetry; but independent of that, a somewhat prolonged acquaintance with

his numerous books enables us emphatically to ratify the 'claims' of

'_his own_' otherwise--though in strong, even fierce, antagonism as

Divine and Writer to his gentle-natured son's after-opinions.

Hitherto, in the brief and meagre notices of his son, and of the

paternal Crashaw, it has simply been stated that he was a

'_Yorkshireman_.' This is mentioned incidentally in various places. We

are now enabled by the interest in our researches of local Antiquaries,

together with aid from the Hunter and Cole MSS., to give for the first

time family-details. Handsworth, sometimes spelled Hansworth, near

Sheffield, one of the hamlets of England in the 'Black Country'--once

couched among green fields and hedge-row 'lanes,' though now blighted

and begrimed--was the 'nest' of the Crashaws; and there and in the

neighbourhood the name is met with until comparatively recent times.[3]

The Church-Register goes back to 1558, and under Baptisms, Aug. 24th,

1568, is this entry, 'Thomas, son of Richard Crawshaw, baptised;' and,

alas, under the following 'November 14th,' 'Thomas, son of Richard

Crawshaw, buried.' Next comes our Worthy:

'1572, October 26th, WILL., son of Richard Crawshaw, baptised.' There

follow: January 12th, 1574, 'Francis;' November 24th, 1577, 'Ann'--both

baptised; April 26th 1585, 'Richard,' son of Richard, buried; 1591,

'Robert Eairl [_sic_] and Dorothy Crawshaw married;' 1608, November

20th, 'Hellen Crawshaw, widow, buried.' Then in 1609, 1611, 1613, 1615,

1619, 1623, 1627, entries concerning the 'Francis' of 1574 and his

household. The name does not reappear until 1682, January 1st, when

'William, son of William Crawshaw, is 'baptised;' and so the usual

record of the light and shadow of 'Births and Marriages and Deaths' goes

on until July 22d, 1729.

It appears from these Register-data that the father of our William

Crashaw was named 'Richard,' and that he died in April 1585, when Master

William was passing his 13th year. It also appears that his mother was

named 'Hellen,' and that she died as 'a widow' in November 1608. In

addition to these entries, I have discovered that this 'Hellen' was

daughter of John Routh, of Waleswood; a name of mark in Yorkshire, in

itself and through marriages.[4] That we are right in all this is made

certain by his Will, wherein our Crashaw (_pater_) leaves 'to the

parishe of Hansworth, in Com. Ebor., where I was borne, my owne works,

all to be bounde together, to lye in the churche; and fourty shillings

in monye to the stocke of the poor of that parishe.'[5] So far as I can

gather from several family-tables which have been furnished to me,

_the_ Richard Crashaw, father of our William Crashaw, was son of another

Richard Crashaw, who in turn was Rector of Aston, next parish to

Handsworth, in 1539. Thus, if not of 'blue blood' in the heraldic sense,

the Crashaws must have been well-to-do; for they are found not only

intermarrying with good Yorkshire families, but also occupying

considerable social status: _e.g._ a son of Francis--described as of

Hansworth-Woodhouse, a hamlet of Hansworth--brother of William, was

admitted to the freedom of the Cutlers' Company of Sheffield in 1638,

and was Master in 1675. I have lineal descents brought down to the

present year; and the annals of the House may hold their own in

family-histories.[6] Our Worthy had life-long intercourse and life-long

friendships with the foremost in Yorkshire, as his Will genially and

quaintly testifies.

Fatherless in his 13th-14th year, his widowed mother must have been in

circumstances pecuniarily that enabled her to have William, at least,

'_prepared_' for the University. He was of renowned 'St. John's,'

Cambridge, designated by him his 'deere nurse and spirituall mother.'[7]

A MS. note by Thomas Baker, in his copy of 'Romish Forgeries and

Falsifications' (1606), now in the Library of St. John's, furnishes

almost the only definite notice of his University career that I have met

with, as follows: 'Guil. Crashawe Eboracensis admissus socius Coll. Jo.

pro Dna Fundatrice, authoritate Regia, sede vacante Epi. Elien. 19 Jan.

1593.'[8] Such is the 'entry' as given by Baker; but in the original it

is as follows: 'Gulielmus Chrashawe Eboracensis admissus sum sisator pro

Mr. Alveye Maij 1, 1591.' The Master and each senior Fellow chose

sizars at this date. Again: 'Ego Gulielmus Crashawe Eboracensis admissus

sum socius huius Collegij pro domina fundatrice, Authoritate regia, sede

vacante Episcopi Eliensis, 19 Januarij 1593' [_i.e._ 1593-4]. The

Bishop of Ely had the right of nominating one Fellow.[9] The See of Ely

was vacant from the death of Bishop Richard Cox, 22d July 1581, to the

occupancy of Martin Heton in 1598-9. Hence it came that the Queen

presented Crashaw to the fellowship of St. John's. (See Baker's St.

John's, by Mayor (vol. i. p. 438), for more details.) This was somewhat

late. How he obtained the patronage of Elizabeth does not appear. The

entry in 'White Vellum Book' of the College Treasury runs simply, 'Being

crediblie informed of the povertie and yet otherwise good qualities and

sufficiencie of Wm. Crashaw, B.A.' &c. The opening paragraphs of his

Will characteristically recount his successive ecclesiastical

appointments and preferments, and hence will fittingly come in here. 'In

the name of the true and everlivinge God, Amen. I William Crashawe,

Bachelor in Divinitie, Preacher of God's Worde. Firste at Bridlington,

then at Beverley in Yorkshire. Afterwards at the Temple; since then

Pastor of the Churche of Ag[nes] Burton, in the diocese of Yorke; nowe

Pastor of that too greate Parishe of White-Chappell in the suburbs of

London: the unworthye and unprofitable servante of God, make and ordaine

this my last Will and Testament.' Previous to the death of Elizabeth he

had been '_deprived_' of a 'little vicarage' ('A Discourse on Popish

Corruptions requiring a Kingly Reformation:' MS. in Royal Library).

Inquiries at Bridlington, formerly Burlington, and the several places

named, have resulted in nothing, from the destruction of muniments, &c.

In the earlier he must have been 'Curate' only. His many legacies of his

'owne workes,' which were to 'lye' in many churches, have all perished,

or at least disappeared; and equally so his various 'monyes' for the

'poore.' It is sorrowful to find how so very often like provisions are

discovered to have gone out of sight, to an aggregate few indeed

suspect.

With Agnes Burton he had closer relations, inasmuch as one 'item' of his

Will runs: 'The next avoydance of Ag. Burton, taken in my brother's name

(for which he knoweth what hath byn offered), I give and bequeathe the

same to my said brother Thomas, to be by him disposed to some worthy

man.'

He describes 'Mr. Henry Alvay,' 'the famous Puritan,' as his 'ffather in

Christ,' in bequeathing him 'one siluer pott with a cover loose, parcell

guilt, of about 13 ounces.'[10] When, or from whom, he received 'orders'

and ordination does not appear, but what our Worthy became as a Preacher

his 'Sermons' remain to attest. They attest his evangelical fervour even

to passion, his intense convictions, his wistful tenderness alternated

with the most vehement rebuke of fashionable sins and worldliness, his

deep personal love for the Lord Jesus, and a strangely pathetic yearning

for all men to be 'safe' in Him. He had a kind of holy ubiquity of zeal

in occupying pulpits where 'witness' was to be borne 'for the Truth.'

His motto, found in a copy of Valerius Maximus, and elsewhere, was

'Servire Deo regnare est' (Notes and Queries, 3d S. vii. 111). America

ought to prize his Sermon 'Preached in London before the Right

Honourable the Lord Lawarre, Lord Governour and Captaine Generall of

Virginia, and others of his Maiestie's Counsell for that Kingdome, and

the rest of the Adventurers in that Plantation. At the said Lord

Generall his leaue-taking of England, his natiue countrey, and departure

for Virginia, February 21, 1609. By W. Crashaw, Bachelar of Divinitie,

and Preacher at the Temple. Wherein both the lawfulnesse of that Action

is maintained, and the necessity thereof is also demonstrated, and so

much out of the grounds of Policie, as of Humanity, Equity and

Christianity. Taken from his mouth, and published by direction.' 1610.

The running heading is 'A New Yeere's Gift to Virginea.' The text is St.

Luke xxii. 32: 'I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and

when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren.' There is no nobler

Sermon than this of the period; and it is only one of various equally

eloquent, impressive, and powerful. Politically the Preacher saw far

ahead, and his patriotism is chivalrous as Sidney's. Dr. Donne later

preached for the same Virginia Company. He had 'sought' to go as

secretary in the outset.

Our Worthy was twice married. Of his first wife--mother of Richard, our

'sweet Singer'--I have failed utterly to get so much as her name. Of his

second wife there remains a privately-printed tractate entitled 'The

Honovr of Vertve, or the Monument erected by the sorowfull Husband, and

the Epitaphes annexed by learned and worthy men, to the immortall memory

of that worthy gentlewoman Mrs. Elizabeth Crashawe. Who dyed in

child-birth, and was buried in Whit-Chappell, October 8, 1620. In the 24

yeare of her age.' Of inconceivable interest would this remarkable

tractate have been, had this been the Poet's mother; but the date shows

that Hunter, in his 'Chorus Vatum,' and others, are mistaken in their

statement that she was such. Richard Crashaw was born in 1612-3, while

the 'Epitaphes' and other allusions touchingly inform us that this fatal

'child-birth' was, 'as she most surely expected,' of her only child. The

great Usher preached her funeral-sermon, 'at which Sermon and Funerall

was present one of the greatest Assemblies that ever was seene in man's

memorie at the burial of any priuate person.' The illustrious

Preacher--who 'vseth,' the Memorial says, 'to be very wary and modeste

in commendation'--is very full and articulate in his praises of the

dead. One bit we read with wet eyes; for among other traits Usher

praises 'her singular motherly affection _to the child of her

predecessor_--a rare vertue [as he noted] in step-mothers at this

day.'[11] One can scarcely avoid a sigh that such a 'step-mother' was

not spared to such a 'child.' No 'quick' name is found to any of the

Verse, nor is the Verse intrinsically very memorable, except for its

wealth of sympathy towards the Widower.[12]

Of our Worthy's numerous Writings I have made out a careful

enumeration, inasmuch as the usual bibliographical authorities (as

Lowndes and Hazlitt) are exceedingly empty; but I must utilise it

elsewhere, seeing that such a catalogue of (for the most part) violent

invective against Popery were incongruous in an edition of the Poetry of

his so opposite-minded son. These three out of our collection will show

that Popery was the supreme object of his aversion; and even the full

title-pages give but a poor idea of the out-o'-way learning--for he was

a scholar among scholars--the grave wit, the sarcasm, the shrewd sense,

and, alas, the uncharity of these and kindred sermons and books. The

first is this, but from a later edition, for a reason that will appear:

'Loyola's Disloyalty; or the Iesvites' open Rebellion against God and

His Church. Whose Doctrine is Blasphemie, in the highest degree, against

the blood of Christ, which they Vilifie, and under-valew, that they

might uphold their Merits. By Consequent, encouraging all Traytors to

kill their lawfull Kings and Princes. With divers other Principles and

Heads of their damnable and erronious Doctrine. Worthy to be written and

read in these our doubtfull and dangerous times. 1643' (4to). This was

originally issued as 'The Iesvites' Gospell' (1610), and in 1621 and

1641 as 'The Bespotted Jesuit.' Be it specially noted that Crashaw

himself must not be made responsible for the after title-pages.[13] Next

is this: 'The Parable of Poyson. In Five Sermons of Spirituall Poyson,

&c. Wherein the poysonfull Nature of Sinne, and the Spirituall Antidotes

against it, are plainely and brefely set downe. Begun before the

Prince his Highnesse. Proceeded in at Greye's Inne and the Temple,

and finished at St. Martin's in the fields. By William Crashaw,

Batcheler of Diuinity, and Preacher of God's word. 1618' (4to). The

Epistle-dedicatory is dated from Agnes Burton, Yorkshire. 'The ioyfull 5

of Nouember, the day neuer to be forgotten.' The third is this: 'The New

Man, or a Svpplication from an vnknowne Person, a Roman Catholike, vnto

Iames, the Monarch of Great Brittaine, and from him to the Emperour,

Kings, and Princes of the Christian World. Touching the causes and

reasons that will argue a necessity of a Generall Councell to be

fortwith assembled against him that now vsurps the Papall Chaire vnder

the name of Paul the fifth. Wherein are discouered more of the secret

Iniquities of that Chaire and Court, then hitherto their friends feared,

or their very aduersaries did suspect. Translated into English by

William Crashaw, Batchelour in Diuinity, according to the Latine Copy,

sent from Rome into England. 1622' (4to). Other of these controversial

tractates, or 'Flytings' (Scotice), are more commonly known, and need

not detailed notice from us. That the 'ruling passion' was 'strong' to

the end, appears by the already repeatedly named Will, the opening of

which has been given, and which thus continues: 'For my religion, I

professe myself in lief and deathe a Christian, and the crosse of Jesus

Christ is my glorye, and His sufferings my salvation. I renounce and

abhorre Atheisme, Iudaisme, Turcisme, and all heresies against the Holy

and Catholike faithe, oulde and newe, and (namelye) Poperie, beinge as

nowe it is established by the canons of Trent and theyr present allowed

decrees and doctors, lyke a confused body of all heresies.' And again:

'I accounte Poperie (as it nowe is) the heape and chaos of all heresies,

and the channell whereunto the fowlest impieties and heresies that have

bene in the Christian worlde have runne and closelye emptied themselves.

I beleeve the Pope's seate and power to be the power of the greate

Antichrist, and the doctrine of the Pope (as nowe it is) to be the

doctrine of Antichrist; yea, that doctrine of devills prophesied of by

the Apostles, and that the trve and absolute Papist, livinge and

dyeinge, debarres himself of salvation for oughte that we knowe. And I

beleve that I am bounde to separate myself from that sinagogue of Rome

if I wil be saved. And I professe myselfe a member of the true Catholike

Churche, but not of the Roman Churche (as nowe it is), and to looke for

salvation, not by that faith nor doctrine which that Churche nowe

teacheth, but that which once it had, but now falne from it.' And then

follow 'groundes' in burning and 'hard' words, intermingled with strange

outbursts of personal humiliation before God and an awful sense of His

scrutiny.

These Title-pages and Will-extracts must suffice to indicate the

Ultra-Protestantism of the elder Crashaw. To qualify them--in addition

to our note of the intensified after title-pages _by others_--it must be

remembered that the Armada of 1588 flung its scaring shadow across his

young days, and that undoubtedly the descendants of Loyola falsified

their venerable Founder's intentions by political agitations and

plottings. These coloured our ecclesiastical polemique's whole ways of

looking at things. His Will and codicil are dated in 1621-2, and during

these years and succeeding, his most fiery and intense 'Sermons' and

tractates were being published. Richard was then growing up into his

teens, and without his 'second' mother. As Crashaw senior died in

1626--his Will having been 'proved' 16th October in that year--our

Poet-saint was only about 13-14 when he lost his father, scarcely ten

when appointed by him executor, the words being: 'I ordaine and make Mr.

Robert Dixon and _my sonne Richarde_ executors of my Will' (10th June

1622).[14]

His Epistles-dedicatory and private Letters (several of which are

preserved in the British Museum, and of which I have copies--one very

long to Sir Julius Caesar on his brother's illness) and his Will, make it

plain that our Worthy mingled in the highest society, and was consulted

in the most delicate affairs. His dedication of one of his most

pronounced books, 'Consilium quorundam Episcop. Bononiae &c.' (1613), to

Shakespeare's Earl of Southampton, _as to a trusted friend_, settles, to

my mind, the (disputed) fact as to the Earl having become a Protestant.

So too the translation of Augustine's 'City of God' (1620, 2d edition)

is dedicated to William Earl of Pembroke, the Earl of Arundel, and the

Earl of Montgomery.

The last matter to be touched on is the Verse of the paternal Crashaw,

which has a unique character of its own. It consists of translations

from the Latin. His 'Loyola's Disloyalty' is based on a rendering of a

Latin poem in super-exaltation of the Virgin Mary by Clarus Bonarscius

(= Carolus Scribanius); and Crashaw animadverts on such 'pointes' as

these: 'That the milke of Mary may come into comparison with the blood

of Christ;' 'that the Christian man's faith may lawfully take hold of

both as well as one;' 'that the best compound for a sicke soule is to

mix together her milke and Christ's blood;' 'that Christ is still a

little child in His mother's armes, and so may be prayed unto;' 'that a

man shall often-times be sooner heard at God's hand in the mediation of

Mary than Jesus Christ;' and so on. I give the opening, middle, and

closing lines.

The Complete Works of Richard Crashaw, Volume II · 第 85 / 654 题