Chapter LXXI: Prospect Of The Ruins Of Rome In The Fifteenth

Century.—Part II

These general observations may be separately applied to the

amphitheatre of Titus, which has obtained the name of the

Coliseum, 49 either from its magnitude, or from Nero’s colossal

statue; an edifice, had it been left to time and nature, which

might perhaps have claimed an eternal duration. The curious

antiquaries, who have computed the numbers and seats, are

disposed to believe, that above the upper row of stone steps the

amphitheatre was encircled and elevated with several stages of

wooden galleries, which were repeatedly consumed by fire, and

restored by the emperors. Whatever was precious, or portable, or

profane, the statues of gods and heroes, and the costly ornaments

of sculpture which were cast in brass, or overspread with leaves

of silver and gold, became the first prey of conquest or

fanaticism, of the avarice of the Barbarians or the Christians.

In the massy stones of the Coliseum, many holes are discerned;

and the two most probable conjectures represent the various

accidents of its decay. These stones were connected by solid

links of brass or iron, nor had the eye of rapine overlooked the

value of the baser metals; 50 the vacant space was converted into

a fair or market; the artisans of the Coliseum are mentioned in

an ancient survey; and the chasms were perforated or enlarged to

receive the poles that supported the shops or tents of the

mechanic trades. 51 Reduced to its naked majesty, the Flavian

amphitheatre was contemplated with awe and admiration by the

pilgrims of the North; and their rude enthusiasm broke forth in a

sublime proverbial expression, which is recorded in the eighth

century, in the fragments of the venerable Bede: “As long as the

Coliseum stands, Rome shall stand; when the Coliseum falls, Rome

will fall; when Rome falls, the world will fall.” 52 In the

modern system of war, a situation commanded by three hills would

not be chosen for a fortress; but the strength of the walls and

arches could resist the engines of assault; a numerous garrison

might be lodged in the enclosure; and while one faction occupied

the Vatican and the Capitol, the other was intrenched in the

Lateran and the Coliseum. 53

49 (return) [ The fourth part of the Verona Illustrata of the

marquis Maffei professedly treats of amphitheatres, particularly

those of Rome and Verona, of their dimensions, wooden galleries,

&c. It is from magnitude that he derives the name of _Colosseum_,

or _Coliseum_; since the same appellation was applied to the

amphitheatre of Capua, without the aid of a colossal statue;

since that of Nero was erected in the court (_in atrio_) of his

palace, and not in the Coliseum, (P. iv. p. 15—19, l. i. c. 4.)]

50 (return) [ Joseph Maria Suarés, a learned bishop, and the

author of a history of Præneste, has composed a separate

dissertation on the seven or eight probable causes of these

holes, which has been since reprinted in the Roman Thesaurus of

Sallengre. Montfaucon (Diarium, p. 233) pronounces the rapine of

the Barbarians to be the unam germanamque causam foraminum. *

Note: The improbability of this theory is shown by Bunsen, vol.

i. p. 239.—M.]

51 (return) [ Donatus, Roma Vetus et Nova, p. 285. Note: Gibbon

has followed Donatus, who supposes that a silk manufactory was

established in the xiith century in the Coliseum. The Bandonarii,

or Bandererii, were the officers who carried the standards of

their _school_ before the pope. Hobhouse, p. 269.—M.]

52 (return) [ Quamdiu stabit Colyseus, stabit et Roma; quando

cadet Coly seus, cadet Roma; quando cadet Roma, cadet et mundus,

(Beda in Excerptis seu Collectaneis apud Ducange Glossar. Med. et

Infimæ Latinitatis, tom. ii. p. 407, edit. Basil.) This saying

must be ascribed to the Anglo-Saxon pilgrims who visited Rome

before the year 735 the æra of Bede’s death; for I do not believe

that our venerable monk ever passed the sea.]

53 (return) [ I cannot recover, in Muratori’s original Lives of

the Popes, (Script Rerum Italicarum, tom. iii. P. i.,) the

passage that attests this hostile partition, which must be

applied to the end of the xiith or the beginning of the xiith

century. * Note: “The division is mentioned in Vit. Innocent.

Pap. II. ex Cardinale Aragonio, (Script. Rer. Ital. vol. iii. P.

i. p. 435,) and Gibbon might have found frequent other records of

it at other dates.” Hobhouse’s Illustrations of Childe Harold. p.

130.—M.]

The abolition at Rome of the ancient games must be understood

with some latitude; and the carnival sports, of the Testacean

mount and the Circus Agonalis, 54 were regulated by the law 55 or

custom of the city. The senator presided with dignity and pomp to

adjudge and distribute the prizes, the gold ring, or the

_pallium_, 56 as it was styled, of cloth or silk. A tribute on

the Jews supplied the annual expense; 57 and the races, on foot,

on horseback, or in chariots, were ennobled by a tilt and

tournament of seventy-two of the Roman youth. In the year one

thousand three hundred and thirty-two, a bull-feast, after the

fashion of the Moors and Spaniards, was celebrated in the

Coliseum itself; and the living manners are painted in a diary of

the times. 58 A convenient order of benches was restored; and a

general proclamation, as far as Rimini and Ravenna, invited the

nobles to exercise their skill and courage in this perilous

adventure. The Roman ladies were marshalled in three squadrons,

and seated in three balconies, which, on this day, the third of

September, were lined with scarlet cloth. The fair Jacova di

Rovere led the matrons from beyond the Tyber, a pure and native

race, who still represent the features and character of

antiquity. The remainder of the city was divided as usual between

the Colonna and Ursini: the two factions were proud of the number

and beauty of their female bands: the charms of Savella Ursini

are mentioned with praise; and the Colonna regretted the absence

of the youngest of their house, who had sprained her ankle in the

garden of Nero’s tower. The lots of the champions were drawn by

an old and respectable citizen; and they descended into the

arena, or pit, to encounter the wild bulls, on foot as it should

seem, with a single spear. Amidst the crowd, our annalist has

selected the names, colors, and devices, of twenty of the most

conspicuous knights. Several of the names are the most

illustrious of Rome and the ecclesiastical state: Malatesta,

Polenta, della Valle, Cafarello, Savelli, Capoccio, Conti,

Annibaldi, Altieri, Corsi: the colors were adapted to their taste

and situation; the devices are expressive of hope or despair, and

breathe the spirit of gallantry and arms. “I am alone, like the

youngest of the Horatii,” the confidence of an intrepid stranger:

“I live disconsolate,” a weeping widower: “I burn under the

ashes,” a discreet lover: “I adore Lavinia, or Lucretia,” the

ambiguous declaration of a modern passion: “My faith is as pure,”

the motto of a white livery: “Who is stronger than myself?” of a

lion’s hide: “If am drowned in blood, what a pleasant death!” the

wish of ferocious courage. The pride or prudence of the Ursini

restrained them from the field, which was occupied by three of

their hereditary rivals, whose inscriptions denoted the lofty

greatness of the Colonna name: “Though sad, I am strong:” “Strong

as I am great:” “If I fall,” addressing himself to the

spectators, “you fall with me;”—intimating (says the contemporary

writer) that while the other families were the subjects of the

Vatican, they alone were the supporters of the Capitol. The

combats of the amphitheatre were dangerous and bloody. Every

champion successively encountered a wild bull; and the victory

may be ascribed to the quadrupeds, since no more than eleven were

left on the field, with the loss of nine wounded and eighteen

killed on the side of their adversaries. Some of the noblest

families might mourn, but the pomp of the funerals, in the

churches of St. John Lateran and St. Maria Maggiore, afforded a

second holiday to the people. Doubtless it was not in such

conflicts that the blood of the Romans should have been shed;

yet, in blaming their rashness, we are compelled to applaud their

gallantry; and the noble volunteers, who display their

magnificence, and risk their lives, under the balconies of the

fair, excite a more generous sympathy than the thousands of

captives and malefactors who were reluctantly dragged to the

scene of slaughter. 59

54 (return) [ Although the structure of the circus Agonalis be

destroyed, it still retains its form and name, (Agona, Nagona,

Navona;) and the interior space affords a sufficient level for

the purpose of racing. But the Monte Testaceo, that strange pile

of broken pottery, seems only adapted for the annual practice of

hurling from top to bottom some wagon-loads of live hogs for the

diversion of the populace, (Statuta Urbis Romæ, p. 186.)]

55 (return) [ See the Statuta Urbis Romæ, l. iii. c. 87, 88, 89,

p. 185, 186. I have already given an idea of this municipal code.

The races of Nagona and Monte Testaceo are likewise mentioned in

the Diary of Peter Antonius from 1404 to 1417, (Muratori, Script.

Rerum Italicarum, tom. xxiv. p. 1124.)]

56 (return) [ The _Pallium_, which Menage so foolishly derives

from _Palmarius_, is an easy extension of the idea and the words,

from the robe or cloak, to the materials, and from thence to

their application as a prize, (Muratori, dissert. xxxiii.)]

57 (return) [ For these expenses, the Jews of Rome paid each year

1130 florins, of which the odd thirty represented the pieces of

silver for which Judas had betrayed his Master to their

ancestors. There was a foot-race of Jewish as well as of

Christian youths, (Statuta Urbis, ibidem.)]

58 (return) [ This extraordinary bull-feast in the Coliseum is

described, from tradition rather than memory, by Ludovico

Buonconte Monaldesco, on the most ancient fragments of Roman

annals, (Muratori, Script Rerum Italicarum, tom. xii. p. 535,

536;) and however fanciful they may seem, they are deeply marked

with the colors of truth and nature.]

59 (return) [ Muratori has given a separate dissertation (the

xxixth) to the games of the Italians in the Middle Ages.]

This use of the amphitheatre was a rare, perhaps a singular,

festival: the demand for the materials was a daily and continual

want which the citizens could gratify without restraint or

remorse. In the fourteenth century, a scandalous act of concord

secured to both factions the privilege of extracting stones from

the free and common quarry of the Coliseum; 60 and Poggius

laments, that the greater part of these stones had been burnt to

lime by the folly of the Romans. 61 To check this abuse, and to

prevent the nocturnal crimes that might be perpetrated in the

vast and gloomy recess, Eugenius the Fourth surrounded it with a

wall; and, by a charter long extant, granted both the ground and

edifice to the monks of an adjacent convent. 62 After his death,

the wall was overthrown in a tumult of the people; and had they

themselves respected the noblest monument of their fathers, they

might have justified the resolve that it should never be degraded

to private property. The inside was damaged: but in the middle of

the sixteenth century, an æra of taste and learning, the exterior

circumference of one thousand six hundred and twelve feet was

still entire and inviolate; a triple elevation of fourscore

arches, which rose to the height of one hundred and eight feet.

Of the present ruin, the nephews of Paul the Third are the guilty

agents; and every traveller who views the Farnese palace may

curse the sacrilege and luxury of these upstart princes. 63 A

similar reproach is applied to the Barberini; and the repetition

of injury might be dreaded from every reign, till the Coliseum

was placed under the safeguard of religion by the most liberal of

the pontiffs, Benedict the Fourteenth, who consecrated a spot

which persecution and fable had stained with the blood of so many

Christian martyrs. 64

60 (return) [ In a concise but instructive memoir, the abbé

Barthelemy (Mémoires de l’Académie des Inscriptions, tom. xxviii.

p. 585) has mentioned this agreement of the factions of the xivth

century de Tiburtino faciendo in the Coliseum, from an original

act in the archives of Rome.]

61 (return) [ Coliseum.... ob stultitiam Romanorum _majori ex

parte_ ad calcem deletum, says the indignant Poggius, (p. 17:)

but his expression too strong for the present age, must be very

tenderly applied to the xvth century.]

62 (return) [ Of the Olivetan monks. Montfaucon (p. 142) affirms

this fact from the memorials of Flaminius Vacca, (No. 72.) They

still hoped on some future occasion, to revive and vindicate

their grant.]

63 (return) [ After measuring the priscus amphitheatri gyrus,

Montfaucon (p. 142) only adds that it was entire under Paul III.;

tacendo clamat. Muratori (Annali d’Italia, tom. xiv. p. 371) more

freely reports the guilt of the Farnese pope, and the indignation

of the Roman people. Against the nephews of Urban VIII. I have no

other evidence than the vulgar saying, “Quod non fecerunt

Barbari, fecere Barberini,” which was perhaps suggested by the

resemblance of the words.]

64 (return) [ As an antiquarian and a priest, Montfaucon thus

deprecates the ruin of the Coliseum: Quòd si non suopte merito

atque pulchritudine dignum fuisset quod improbas arceret manus,

indigna res utique in locum tot martyrum cruore sacrum tantopere

sævitum esse.]

When Petrarch first gratified his eyes with a view of those

monuments, whose scattered fragments so far surpass the most

eloquent descriptions, he was astonished at the supine

indifference 65 of the Romans themselves; 66 he was humbled

rather than elated by the discovery, that, except his friend

Rienzi, and one of the Colonna, a stranger of the Rhône was more

conversant with these antiquities than the nobles and natives of

the metropolis. 67 The ignorance and credulity of the Romans are

elaborately displayed in the old survey of the city which was

composed about the beginning of the thirteenth century; and,

without dwelling on the manifold errors of name and place, the

legend of the Capitol 68 may provoke a smile of contempt and

indignation. “The Capitol,” says the anonymous writer, “is so

named as being the head of the world; where the consuls and

senators formerly resided for the government of the city and the

globe. The strong and lofty walls were covered with glass and

gold, and crowned with a roof of the richest and most curious

carving. Below the citadel stood a palace, of gold for the

greatest part, decorated with precious stones, and whose value

might be esteemed at one third of the world itself. The statues

of all the provinces were arranged in order, each with a small

bell suspended from its neck; and such was the contrivance of art

magic, 69 that if the province rebelled against Rome, the statue

turned round to that quarter of the heavens, the bell rang, the

prophet of the Capitol repeated the prodigy, and the senate was

admonished of the impending danger.” A second example, of less

importance, though of equal absurdity, may be drawn from the two

marble horses, led by two naked youths, who have since been

transported from the baths of Constantine to the Quirinal hill.

The groundless application of the names of Phidias and Praxiteles

may perhaps be excused; but these Grecian sculptors should not

have been removed above four hundred years from the age of

Pericles to that of Tiberius; they should not have been

transferred into two philosophers or magicians, whose nakedness

was the symbol of truth or knowledge, who revealed to the emperor

his most secret actions; and, after refusing all pecuniary

recompense, solicited the honor of leaving this eternal monument

of themselves. 70 Thus awake to the power of magic, the Romans

were insensible to the beauties of art: no more than five statues

were visible to the eyes of Poggius; and of the multitudes which

chance or design had buried under the ruins, the resurrection was

fortunately delayed till a safer and more enlightened age. 71 The

Nile which now adorns the Vatican, had been explored by some

laborers in digging a vineyard near the temple, or convent, of

the Minerva; but the impatient proprietor, who was tormented by

some visits of curiosity, restored the unprofitable marble to its

former grave. 72 The discovery of a statue of Pompey, ten feet in

length, was the occasion of a lawsuit. It had been found under a

partition wall: the equitable judge had pronounced, that the head

should be separated from the body to satisfy the claims of the

contiguous owners; and the sentence would have been executed, if

the intercession of a cardinal, and the liberality of a pope, had

not rescued the Roman hero from the hands of his barbarous

countrymen. 73

65 (return) [ Yet the statutes of Rome (l. iii. c. 81, p. 182)

impose a fine of 500 _aurei_ on whosoever shall demolish any

ancient edifice, ne ruinis civitas deformetur, et ut antiqua

ædificia decorem urbis perpetuo representent.]

66 (return) [ In his first visit to Rome (A.D. 1337. See Mémoires

sur Pétrarque, tom. i. p. 322, &c.) Petrarch is struck mute

miraculo rerum tantarum, et stuporis mole obrutus.... Præsentia

vero, mirum dictû nihil imminuit: vere major fuit Roma majoresque

sunt reliquiæ quam rebar. Jam non orbem ab hâc urbe domitum, sed

tam sero domitum, miror, (Opp. p. 605, Familiares, ii. 14, Joanni

Columnæ.)]

67 (return) [ He excepts and praises the _rare_ knowledge of John

Colonna. Qui enim hodie magis ignari rerum Romanarum, quam Romani

cives! Invitus dico, nusquam minus Roma cognoscitur quam Romæ.]

68 (return) [ After the description of the Capitol, he adds,

statuæ erant quot sunt mundi provinciæ; et habebat quælibet

tintinnabulum ad collum. Et erant ita per magicam artem

dispositæ, ut quando aliqua regio Romano Imperio rebellis erat,

statim imago illius provinciæ vertebat se contra illam; unde

tintinnabulum resonabat quod pendebat ad collum; tuncque vates

Capitolii qui erant custodes senatui, &c. He mentions an example

of the Saxons and Suevi, who, after they had been subdued by

Agrippa, again rebelled: tintinnabulum sonuit; sacerdos qui erat

in speculo in hebdomada senatoribus nuntiavit: Agrippa marched

back and reduced the—Persians, (Anonym. in Montfaucon, p. 297,

298.)]

69 (return) [ The same writer affirms, that Virgil captus a

Romanis invisibiliter exiit, ivitque Neapolim. A Roman magician,

in the xith century, is introduced by William of Malmsbury, (de

Gestis Regum Anglorum, l. ii. p. 86;) and in the time of

Flaminius Vacca (No. 81, 103) it was the vulgar belief that the

strangers (the _Goths_) invoked the dæmons for the discovery of

hidden treasures.]

70 (return) [ Anonym. p. 289. Montfaucon (p. 191) justly

observes, that if Alexander be represented, these statues cannot

be the work of Phidias (Olympiad lxxxiii.) or Praxiteles,

(Olympiad civ.,) who lived before that conqueror (Plin. Hist.

Natur. xxxiv. 19.)]

71 (return) [ William of Malmsbury (l. ii. p. 86, 87) relates a

marvellous discovery (A.D. 1046) of Pallas the son of Evander,

who had been slain by Turnus; the perpetual light in his

sepulchre, a Latin epitaph, the corpse, yet entire, of a young

giant, the enormous wound in his breast, (pectus perforat

ingens,) &c. If this fable rests on the slightest foundation, we

may pity the bodies, as well as the statues, that were exposed to

the air in a barbarous age.]

72 (return) [ Prope porticum Minervæ, statua est recubantis,

cujus caput integrâ effigie tantæ magnitudinis, ut signa omnia

excedat. Quidam ad plantandas arbores scrobes faciens detexit. Ad

hoc visendum cum plures in dies magis concurrerent, strepitum

adeuentium fastidiumque pertæsus, horti patronus congestâ humo

texit, (Poggius de Varietate Fortunæ, p. 12.)]

73 (return) [ See the Memorials of Flaminius Vacca, No. 57, p.

11, 12, at the end of the Roma Antica of Nardini, (1704, in

4to.)]

But the clouds of barbarism were gradually dispelled; and the

peaceful authority of Martin the Fifth and his successors

restored the ornaments of the city as well as the order of the

ecclesiastical state. The improvements of Rome, since the

fifteenth century, have not been the spontaneous produce of

freedom and industry. The first and most natural root of a great

city is the labor and populousness of the adjacent country, which

supplies the materials of subsistence, of manufactures, and of

foreign trade. But the greater part of the Campagna of Rome is

reduced to a dreary and desolate wilderness: the overgrown

estates of the princes and the clergy are cultivated by the lazy

hands of indigent and hopeless vassals; and the scanty harvests

are confined or exported for the benefit of a monopoly. A second

and more artificial cause of the growth of a metropolis is the

residence of a monarch, the expense of a luxurious court, and the

tributes of dependent provinces. Those provinces and tributes had

been lost in the fall of the empire; and if some streams of the

silver of Peru and the gold of Brazil have been attracted by the

Vatican, the revenues of the cardinals, the fees of office, the

oblations of pilgrims and clients, and the remnant of

ecclesiastical taxes, afford a poor and precarious supply, which

maintains, however, the idleness of the court and city. The

population of Rome, far below the measure of the great capitals

of Europe, does not exceed one hundred and seventy thousand

inhabitants; 74 and within the spacious enclosure of the walls,

the largest portion of the seven hills is overspread with

vineyards and ruins. The beauty and splendor of the modern city

may be ascribed to the abuses of the government, to the influence

of superstition. Each reign (the exceptions are rare) has been

marked by the rapid elevation of a new family, enriched by the

childish pontiff at the expense of the church and country. The

palaces of these fortunate nephews are the most costly monuments

of elegance and servitude: the perfect arts of architecture,

sculpture, and painting, have been prostituted in their service;

and their galleries and gardens are decorated with the most

precious works of antiquity, which taste or vanity has prompted

them to collect. The ecclesiastical revenues were more decently

employed by the popes themselves in the pomp of the Catholic

worship; but it is superfluous to enumerate their pious

foundations of altars, chapels, and churches, since these lesser

stars are eclipsed by the sun of the Vatican, by the dome of St.

Peter, the most glorious structure that ever has been applied to

the use of religion. The fame of Julius the Second, Leo the

Tenth, and Sixtus the Fifth, is accompanied by the superior merit

of Bramante and Fontana, of Raphael and Michael Angelo; and the

same munificence which had been displayed in palaces and temples

was directed with equal zeal to revive and emulate the labors of

antiquity. Prostrate obelisks were raised from the ground, and

erected in the most conspicuous places; of the eleven aqueducts

of the Cæsars and consuls, three were restored; the artificial

rivers were conducted over a long series of old, or of new

arches, to discharge into marble basins a flood of salubrious and

refreshing waters: and the spectator, impatient to ascend the

steps of St. Peter’s, is detained by a column of Egyptian

granite, which rises between two lofty and perpetual fountains,

to the height of one hundred and twenty feet. The map, the

description, the monuments of ancient Rome, have been elucidated

by the diligence of the antiquarian and the student: 75 and the

footsteps of heroes, the relics, not of superstition, but of

empire, are devoutly visited by a new race of pilgrims from the

remote, and once savage countries of the North.

74 (return) [ In the year 1709, the inhabitants of Rome (without

including eight or ten thousand Jews,) amounted to 138,568 souls,

(Labat Voyages en Espagne et en Italie, tom. iii. p. 217, 218.)

In 1740, they had increased to 146,080; and in 1765, I left them,

without the Jews 161,899. I am ignorant whether they have since

continued in a progressive state.]

75 (return) [ The Père Montfaucon distributes his own

observations into twenty days; he should have styled them weeks,

or months, of his visits to the different parts of the city,

(Diarium Italicum, c. 8—20, p. 104—301.) That learned Benedictine

reviews the topographers of ancient Rome; the first efforts of

Blondus, Fulvius, Martianus, and Faunus, the superior labors of

Pyrrhus Ligorius, had his learning been equal to his labors; the

writings of Onuphrius Panvinius, qui omnes obscuravit, and the

recent but imperfect books of Donatus and Nardini. Yet Montfaucon

still sighs for a more complete plan and description of the old

city, which must be attained by the three following methods: 1.

The measurement of the space and intervals of the ruins. 2. The

study of inscriptions, and the places where they were found. 3.

The investigation of all the acts, charters, diaries of the

middle ages, which name any spot or building of Rome. The

laborious work, such as Montfaucon desired, must be promoted by

princely or public munificence: but the great modern plan of

Nolli (A.D. 1748) would furnish a solid and accurate basis for

the ancient topography of Rome.]

Of these pilgrims, and of every reader, the attention will be

excited by a History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire;

the greatest, perhaps, and most awful scene in the history of

mankind. The various causes and progressive effects are connected

with many of the events most interesting in human annals: the

artful policy of the Cæsars, who long maintained the name and

image of a free republic; the disorders of military despotism;

the rise, establishment, and sects of Christianity; the

foundation of Constantinople; the division of the monarchy; the

invasion and settlements of the Barbarians of Germany and

Scythia; the institutions of the civil law; the character and

religion of Mahomet; the temporal sovereignty of the popes; the

restoration and decay of the Western empire of Charlemagne; the

crusades of the Latins in the East: the conquests of the Saracens

and Turks; the ruin of the Greek empire; the state and

revolutions of Rome in the middle age. The historian may applaud

the importance and variety of his subject; but while he is

conscious of his own imperfections, he must often accuse the

deficiency of his materials. It was among the ruins of the

Capitol that I first conceived the idea of a work which has

amused and exercised near twenty years of my life, and which,

however inadequate to my own wishes, I finally delivere to the

curiosity and candor of the public.

Lausanne, June 27 1787

History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 6(#736) · 第 19 / 19 章