effectual choice: instead of a private citizen, to whom they
yielded a voluntary and precarious obedience, the Romans elected
for their senator some prince of independent power, who could
defend them from their enemies and themselves. Charles of Anjou
and Provence, the most ambitious and warlike monarch of the age,
accepted at the same time the kingdom of Naples from the pope,
and the office of senator from the Roman people. 50 As he passed
through the city, in his road to victory, he received their oath
of allegiance, lodged in the Lateran palace, and smoothed in a
short visit the harsh features of his despotic character. Yet
even Charles was exposed to the inconstancy of the people, who
saluted with the same acclamations the passage of his rival, the
unfortunate Conradin; and a powerful avenger, who reigned in the
Capitol, alarmed the fears and jealousy of the popes. The
absolute term of his life was superseded by a renewal every third
year; and the enmity of Nicholas the Third obliged the Sicilian
king to abdicate the government of Rome. In his bull, a perpetual
law, the imperious pontiff asserts the truth, validity, and use
of the donation of Constantine, not less essential to the peace
of the city than to the independence of the church; establishes
the annual election of the senator; and formally disqualifies all
emperors, kings, princes, and persons of an eminent and
conspicuous rank. 51 This prohibitory clause was repealed in his
own behalf by Martin the Fourth, who humbly solicited the
suffrage of the Romans. In the presence, and by the authority, of
the people, two electors conferred, not on the pope, but on the
noble and faithful Martin, the dignity of senator, and the
supreme administration of the republic, 52 to hold during his
natural life, and to exercise at pleasure by himself or his
deputies. About fifty years afterwards, the same title was
granted to the emperor Lewis of Bavaria; and the liberty of Rome
was acknowledged by her two sovereigns, who accepted a municipal
office in the government of their own metropolis.
50 (return) [ The election of Charles of Anjou to the office of
perpetual senator of Rome is mentioned by the historians in the
viiith volume of the Collection of Muratori, by Nicholas de
Jamsilla, (p. 592,) the monk of Padua, (p. 724,) Sabas Malaspina,
(l. ii. c. 9, p. 308,) and Ricordano Malespini, (c. 177, p.
999.)]
51 (return) [ The high-sounding bull of Nicholas III., which
founds his temporal sovereignty on the donation of Constantine,
is still extant; and as it has been inserted by Boniface VIII. in
the _Sexte_ of the Decretals, it must be received by the
Catholics, or at least by the Papists, as a sacred and perpetual
law.]
52 (return) [ I am indebted to Fleury (Hist. Ecclés. tom. xviii.
p. 306) for an extract of this Roman act, which he has taken from
the Ecclesiastical Annals of Odericus Raynaldus, A.D. 1281, No.
14, 15.]
In the first moments of rebellion, when Arnold of Brescia had
inflamed their minds against the church, the Romans artfully
labored to conciliate the favor of the empire, and to recommend
their merit and services in the cause of Cæsar. The style of
their ambassadors to Conrad the Third and Frederic the First is a
mixture of flattery and pride, the tradition and the ignorance of
their own history. 53 After some complaint of his silence and
neglect, they exhort the former of these princes to pass the
Alps, and assume from their hands the Imperial crown. “We beseech
your majesty not to disdain the humility of your sons and
vassals, not to listen to the accusations of our common enemies;
who calumniate the senate as hostile to your throne, who sow the
seeds of discord, that they may reap the harvest of destruction.
The pope and the _Sicilian_ are united in an impious league to
oppose _our_ liberty and _your_ coronation. With the blessing of
God, our zeal and courage has hitherto defeated their attempts.
Of their powerful and factious adherents, more especially the
Frangipani, we have taken by assault the houses and turrets: some
of these are occupied by our troops, and some are levelled with
the ground. The Milvian bridge, which they had broken, is
restored and fortified for your safe passage; and your army may
enter the city without being annoyed from the castle of St.
Angelo. All that we have done, and all that we design, is for
your honor and service, in the loyal hope, that you will speedily
appear in person, to vindicate those rights which have been
invaded by the clergy, to revive the dignity of the empire, and
to surpass the fame and glory of your predecessors. May you fix
your residence in Rome, the capital of the world; give laws to
Italy, and the Teutonic kingdom; and imitate the example of
Constantine and Justinian, 54 who, by the vigor of the senate and
people, obtained the sceptre of the earth.” 55 But these splendid
and fallacious wishes were not cherished by Conrad the
Franconian, whose eyes were fixed on the Holy Land, and who died
without visiting Rome soon after his return from the Holy Land.
53 (return) [ These letters and speeches are preserved by Otho
bishop of Frisingen, (Fabric. Bibliot. Lat. Med. et Infim. tom.
v. p. 186, 187,) perhaps the noblest of historians: he was son of
Leopold marquis of Austria; his mother, Agnes, was daughter of
the emperor Henry IV., and he was half-brother and uncle to
Conrad III. and Frederic I. He has left, in seven books, a
Chronicle of the Times; in two, the Gesta Frederici I., the last
of which is inserted in the vith volume of Muratori’s
historians.]
54 (return) [ We desire (said the ignorant Romans) to restore the
empire in um statum, quo fuit tempore Constantini et Justiniani,
qui totum orbem vigore senatûs et populi Romani suis tenuere
manibus.]
55 (return) [ Otho Frising. de Gestis Frederici I. l. i. c. 28,
p. 662—664.]
His nephew and successor, Frederic Barbarossa, was more ambitious
of the Imperial crown; nor had any of the successors of Otho
acquired such absolute sway over the kingdom of Italy. Surrounded
by his ecclesiastical and secular princes, he gave audience in
his camp at Sutri to the ambassadors of Rome, who thus addressed
him in a free and florid oration: “Incline your ear to the queen
of cities; approach with a peaceful and friendly mind the
precincts of Rome, which has cast away the yoke of the clergy,
and is impatient to crown her legitimate emperor. Under your
auspicious influence, may the primitive times be restored. Assert
the prerogatives of the eternal city, and reduce under her
monarchy the insolence of the world. You are not ignorant, that,
in former ages, by the wisdom of the senate, by the valor and
discipline of the equestrian order, she extended her victorious
arms to the East and West, beyond the Alps, and over the islands
of the ocean. By our sins, in the absence of our princes, the
noble institution of the senate has sunk in oblivion; and with
our prudence, our strength has likewise decreased. We have
revived the senate, and the equestrian order: the counsels of the
one, the arms of the other, will be devoted to your person and
the service of the empire. Do you not hear the language of the
Roman matron? You were a guest, I have adopted you as a citizen;
a Transalpine stranger, I have elected you for my sovereign; 56
and given you myself, and all that is mine. Your first and most
sacred duty is to swear and subscribe, that you will shed your
blood for the republic; that you will maintain in peace and
justice the laws of the city and the charters of your
predecessors; and that you will reward with five thousand pounds
of silver the faithful senators who shall proclaim your titles in
the Capitol. With the name, assume the character, of Augustus.”
The flowers of Latin rhetoric were not yet exhausted; but
Frederic, impatient of their vanity, interrupted the orators in
the high tone of royalty and conquest. “Famous indeed have been
the fortitude and wisdom of the ancient Romans; but your speech
is not seasoned with wisdom, and I could wish that fortitude were
conspicuous in your actions. Like all sublunary things, Rome has
felt the vicissitudes of time and fortune. Your noblest families
were translated to the East, to the royal city of Constantine;
and the remains of your strength and freedom have long since been
exhausted by the Greeks and Franks. Are you desirous of beholding
the ancient glory of Rome, the gravity of the senate, the spirit
of the knights, the discipline of the camp, the valor of the
legions? you will find them in the German republic. It is not
empire, naked and alone, the ornaments and virtues of empire have
likewise migrated beyond the Alps to a more deserving people: 57
they will be employed in your defence, but they claim your
obedience. You pretend that myself or my predecessors have been
invited by the Romans: you mistake the word; they were not
invited, they were implored. From its foreign and domestic
tyrants, the city was rescued by Charlemagne and Otho, whose
ashes repose in our country; and their dominion was the price of
your deliverance. Under that dominion your ancestors lived and
died. I claim by the right of inheritance and possession, and who
shall dare to extort you from my hands? Is the hand of the Franks
58 and Germans enfeebled by age? Am I vanquished? Am I a captive?
Am I not encompassed with the banners of a potent and invincible
army? You impose conditions on your master; you require oaths: if
the conditions are just, an oath is superfluous; if unjust, it is
criminal. Can you doubt my equity? It is extended to the meanest
of my subjects. Will not my sword be unsheathed in the defence of
the Capitol? By that sword the northern kingdom of Denmark has
been restored to the Roman empire. You prescribe the measure and
the objects of my bounty, which flows in a copious but a
voluntary stream. All will be given to patient merit; all will be
denied to rude importunity.” 59 Neither the emperor nor the
senate could maintain these lofty pretensions of dominion and
liberty. United with the pope, and suspicious of the Romans,
Frederic continued his march to the Vatican; his coronation was
disturbed by a sally from the Capitol; and if the numbers and
valor of the Germans prevailed in the bloody conflict, he could
not safely encamp in the presence of a city of which he styled
himself the sovereign. About twelve years afterwards, he besieged
Rome, to seat an antipope in the chair of St. Peter; and twelve
Pisan galleys were introduced into the Tyber: but the senate and
people were saved by the arts of negotiation and the progress of
disease; nor did Frederic or his successors reiterate the hostile
attempt. Their laborious reigns were exercised by the popes, the
crusades, and the independence of Lombardy and Germany: they
courted the alliance of the Romans; and Frederic the Second
offered in the Capitol the great standard, the _Caroccio_ of
Milan. 60 After the extinction of the house of Swabia, they were
banished beyond the Alps: and their last coronations betrayed the
impotence and poverty of the Teutonic Cæsars. 61
56 (return) [ Hospes eras, civem feci. Advena fuisti ex
Transalpinis partibus principem constitui.]
57 (return) [ Non cessit nobis nudum imperium, virtute sua
amictum venit, ornamenta sua secum traxit. Penes nos sunt
consules tui, &c. Cicero or Livy would not have rejected these
images, the eloquence of a Barbarian born and educated in the
Hercynian forest.]
58 (return) [ Otho of Frisingen, who surely understood the
language of the court and diet of Germany, speaks of the Franks
in the xiith century as the reigning nation, (Proceres Franci,
equites Franci, manus Francorum:) he adds, however, the epithet
of _Teutonici_.]
59 (return) [ Otho Frising. de Gestis Frederici I., l. ii. c. 22,
p. 720—733. These original and authentic acts I have translated
and abridged with freedom, yet with fidelity.]
60 (return) [ From the Chronicles of Ricobaldo and Francis Pipin,
Muratori (dissert. xxvi. tom. ii. p. 492) has translated this
curious fact with the doggerel verses that accompanied the gift:—
Ave decus orbis, ave! victus tibi destinor, ave! Currus
ab Augusto Frederico Cæsare justo. Væ Mediolanum! jam
sentis spernere vanum Imperii vires, proprias tibi
tollere vires. Ergo triumphorum urbs potes memor esse
priorum Quos tibi mittebant reges qui bella gerebant.
Ne si dee tacere (I now use the Italian Dissertations, tom. i. p.
444) che nell’ anno 1727, una copia desso Caroccio in marmo
dianzi ignoto si scopri, nel campidoglio, presso alle carcere di
quel luogo, dove Sisto V. l’avea falto rinchiudere. Stava esso
posto sopra quatro colonne di marmo fino colla sequente
inscrizione, &c.; to the same purpose as the old inscription.]
61 (return) [ The decline of the Imperial arms and authority in
Italy is related with impartial learning in the Annals of
Muratori, (tom. x. xi. xii.;) and the reader may compare his
narrative with the Histoires des Allemands (tom. iii. iv.) by
Schmidt, who has deserved the esteem of his countrymen.]
Under the reign of Adrian, when the empire extended from the
Euphrates to the ocean, from Mount Atlas to the Grampian hills, a
fanciful historian 62 amused the Romans with the picture of their
ancient wars. “There was a time,” says Florus, “when Tibur and
Præneste, our summer retreats, were the objects of hostile vows
in the Capitol, when we dreaded the shades of the Arician groves,
when we could triumph without a blush over the nameless villages
of the Sabines and Latins, and even Corioli could afford a title
not unworthy of a victorious general.” The pride of his
contemporaries was gratified by the contrast of the past and the
present: they would have been humbled by the prospect of
futurity; by the prediction, that after a thousand years, Rome,
despoiled of empire, and contracted to her primæval limits, would
renew the same hostilities, on the same ground which was then
decorated with her villas and gardens. The adjacent territory on
either side of the Tyber was always claimed, and sometimes
possessed, as the patrimony of St. Peter; but the barons assumed
a lawless independence, and the cities too faithfully copied the
revolt and discord of the metropolis. In the twelfth and
thirteenth centuries the Romans incessantly labored to reduce or
destroy the contumacious vassals of the church and senate; and if
their headstrong and selfish ambition was moderated by the pope,
he often encouraged their zeal by the alliance of his spiritual
arms. Their warfare was that of the first consuls and dictators,
who were taken from the plough. The assembled in arms at the foot
of the Capitol; sallied from the gates, plundered or burnt the
harvests of their neighbors, engaged in tumultuary conflict, and
returned home after an expedition of fifteen or twenty days.
Their sieges were tedious and unskilful: in the use of victory,
they indulged the meaner passions of jealousy and revenge; and
instead of adopting the valor, they trampled on the misfortunes,
of their adversaries. The captives, in their shirts, with a rope
round their necks, solicited their pardon: the fortifications,
and even the buildings, of the rival cities, were demolished, and
the inhabitants were scattered in the adjacent villages. It was
thus that the seats of the cardinal bishops, Porto, Ostia,
Albanum, Tusculum, Præneste, and Tibur or Tivoli, were
successively overthrown by the ferocious hostility of the Romans.
63 Of these, 64 Porto and Ostia, the two keys of the Tyber, are
still vacant and desolate: the marshy and unwholesome banks are
peopled with herds of buffaloes, and the river is lost to every
purpose of navigation and trade. The hills, which afford a shady
retirement from the autumnal heats, have again smiled with the
blessings of peace; Frescati has arisen near the ruins of
Tusculum; Tibur or Tivoli has resumed the honors of a city, 65
and the meaner towns of Albano and Palestrina are decorated with
the villas of the cardinals and princes of Rome. In the work of
destruction, the ambition of the Romans was often checked and
repulsed by the neighboring cities and their allies: in the first
siege of Tibur, they were driven from their camp; and the battles
of Tusculum 66 and Viterbo 67 might be compared in their relative
state to the memorable fields of Thrasymene and Cannæ. In the
first of these petty wars, thirty thousand Romans were overthrown
by a thousand German horse, whom Frederic Barbarossa had detached
to the relief of Tusculum: and if we number the slain at three,
the prisoners at two, thousand, we shall embrace the most
authentic and moderate account. Sixty-eight years afterwards they
marched against Viterbo in the ecclesiastical state with the
whole force of the city; by a rare coalition the Teutonic eagle
was blended, in the adverse banners, with the keys of St. Peter;
and the pope’s auxiliaries were commanded by a count of Thoulouse
and a bishop of Winchester. The Romans were discomfited with
shame and slaughter: but the English prelate must have indulged
the vanity of a pilgrim, if he multiplied their numbers to one
hundred, and their loss in the field to thirty, thousand men. Had
the policy of the senate and the discipline of the legions been
restored with the Capitol, the divided condition of Italy would
have offered the fairest opportunity of a second conquest. But in
arms, the modern Romans were not _above_, and in arts, they were
far _below_, the common level of the neighboring republics. Nor
was their warlike spirit of any long continuance; after some
irregular sallies, they subsided in the national apathy, in the
neglect of military institutions, and in the disgraceful and
dangerous use of foreign mercenaries.
62 (return) [ Tibur nunc suburbanum, et æstivæ Præneste deliciæ,
nuncupatis in Capitolio votis petebantur. The whole passage of
Florus (l. i. c. 11) may be read with pleasure, and has deserved
the praise of a man of genius, (uvres de Montesquieu, tom. iii.
p. 634, 635, quarto edition.)]
63 (return) [ Ne a feritate Romanorum, sicut fuerant Hostienses,
Portuenses, Tusculanenses, Albanenses, Labicenses, et nuper
Tiburtini destruerentur, (Matthew Paris, p. 757.) These events
are marked in the Annals and Index (the xviiith volume) of
Muratori.]
64 (return) [ For the state or ruin of these suburban cities, the
banks of the Tyber, &c., see the lively picture of the P. Labat,
(Voyage en Espagne et en Italiæ,) who had long resided in the
neighborhood of Rome, and the more accurate description of which
P. Eschinard (Roma, 1750, in octavo) has added to the
topographical map of Cingolani.]
65 (return) [ Labat (tom. iii. p. 233) mentions a recent decree
of the Roman government, which has severely mortified the pride
and poverty of Tivoli: in civitate Tiburtinâ non vivitur
civiliter.]
66 (return) [ I depart from my usual method, of quoting only by
the date the Annals of Muratori, in consideration of the critical
balance in which he has weighed nine contemporary writers who
mention the battle of Tusculum, (tom. x. p. 42—44.)]
67 (return) [ Matthew Paris, p. 345. This bishop of Winchester
was Peter de Rupibus, who occupied the see thirty-two years,
(A.D. 1206—1238.) and is described, by the English historian, as
a soldier and a statesman. (p. 178, 399.)]
Ambition is a weed of quick and early vegetation in the vineyard
of Christ. Under the first Christian princes, the chair of St.
Peter was disputed by the votes, the venality, the violence, of a
popular election: the sanctuaries of Rome were polluted with
blood; and, from the third to the twelfth century, the church was
distracted by the mischief of frequent schisms. As long as the
final appeal was determined by the civil magistrate, these
mischiefs were transient and local: the merits were tried by
equity or favor; nor could the unsuccessful competitor long
disturb the triumph of his rival. But after the emperors had been
divested of their prerogatives, after a maxim had been
established that the vicar of Christ is amenable to no earthly
tribunal, each vacancy of the holy see might involve Christendom
in controversy and war. The claims of the cardinals and inferior
clergy, of the nobles and people, were vague and litigious: the
freedom of choice was overruled by the tumults of a city that no
longer owned or obeyed a superior. On the decease of a pope, two
factions proceeded in different churches to a double election:
the number and weight of votes, the priority of time, the merit
of the candidates, might balance each other: the most respectable
of the clergy were divided; and the distant princes, who bowed
before the spiritual throne, could not distinguish the spurious,
from the legitimate, idol. The emperors were often the authors of
the schism, from the political motive of opposing a friendly to a
hostile pontiff; and each of the competitors was reduced to
suffer the insults of his enemies, who were not awed by
conscience, and to purchase the support of his adherents, who
were instigated by avarice or ambition a peaceful and perpetual
succession was ascertained by Alexander the Third, 68 who finally
abolished the tumultuary votes of the clergy and people, and
defined the right of election in the sole college of cardinals.
69 The three orders of bishops, priests, and deacons, were
assimilated to each other by this important privilege; the
parochial clergy of Rome obtained the first rank in the
hierarchy: they were indifferently chosen among the nations of
Christendom; and the possession of the richest benefices, of the
most important bishoprics, was not incompatible with their title
and office. The senators of the Catholic church, the coadjutors
and legates of the supreme pontiff, were robed in purple, the
symbol of martyrdom or royalty; they claimed a proud equality
with kings; and their dignity was enhanced by the smallness of
their number, which, till the reign of Leo the Tenth, seldom
exceeded twenty or twenty-five persons. By this wise regulation,
all doubt and scandal were removed, and the root of schism was so
effectually destroyed, that in a period of six hundred years a
double choice has only once divided the unity of the sacred
college. But as the concurrence of two thirds of the votes had
been made necessary, the election was often delayed by the
private interest and passions of the cardinals; and while they
prolonged their independent reign, the Christian world was left
destitute of a head. A vacancy of almost three years had preceded
the elevation of George the Tenth, who resolved to prevent the
future abuse; and his bull, after some opposition, has been
consecrated in the code of the canon law. 70 Nine days are
allowed for the obsequies of the deceased pope, and the arrival
of the absent cardinals; on the tenth, they are imprisoned, each
with one domestic, in a common apartment or _conclave_, without
any separation of walls or curtains: a small window is reserved
for the introduction of necessaries; but the door is locked on
both sides and guarded by the magistrates of the city, to seclude
them from all correspondence with the world. If the election be
not consummated in three days, the luxury of their table is
contracted to a single dish at dinner and supper; and after the
eighth day, they are reduced to a scanty allowance of bread,
water, and wine. During the vacancy of the holy see, the
cardinals are prohibited from touching the revenues, or assuming,
unless in some rare emergency, the government of the church: all
agreements and promises among the electors are formally annulled;
and their integrity is fortified by their solemn oath and the
prayers of the Catholics. Some articles of inconvenient or
superfluous rigor have been gradually relaxed, but the principle
of confinement is vigorous and entire: they are still urged, by
the personal motives of health and freedom, to accelerate the
moment of their deliverance; and the improvement of ballot or
secret votes has wrapped the struggles of the conclave 71 in the
silky veil of charity and politeness. 72 By these institutions
the Romans were excluded from the election of their prince and
bishop; and in the fever of wild and precarious liberty, they
seemed insensible of the loss of this inestimable privilege. The
emperor Lewis of Bavaria revived the example of the great Otho.
After some negotiation with the magistrates, the Roman people
were assembled 73 in the square before St. Peter’s: the pope of
Avignon, John the Twenty-second, was deposed: the choice of his
successor was ratified by their consent and applause. They freely
voted for a new law, that their bishop should never be absent
more than three months in the year, and two days’ journey from
the city; and that if he neglected to return on the third
summons, the public servant should be degraded and dismissed. 74
But Lewis forgot his own debility and the prejudices of the
times: beyond the precincts of a German camp, his useless phantom
was rejected; the Romans despised their own workmanship; the
antipope implored the mercy of his lawful sovereign; 75 and the
exclusive right of the cardinals was more firmly established by
this unseasonable attack.
68 (return) [ See Mosheim, Institut. Histor. Ecclesiast. p. 401,
403. Alexander himself had nearly been the victim of a contested
election; and the doubtful merits of Innocent had only
preponderated by the weight of genius and learning which St.
Bernard cast into the scale, (see his life and writings.)]
69 (return) [ The origin, titles, importance, dress, precedency,
&c., of the Roman cardinals, are very ably discussed by
Thomassin, (Discipline de l’Eglise, tom. i. p. 1262—1287;) but
their purple is now much faded. The sacred college was raised to
the definite number of seventy-two, to represent, under his
vicar, the disciples of Christ.]
70 (return) [ See the bull of Gregory X. approbante sacro
concilio, in the _Sexts_ of the Canon Law, (l. i. tit. 6, c. 3,)
a supplement to the Decretals, which Boniface VIII. promulgated
at Rome in 1298, and addressed in all the universities of
Europe.]
71 (return) [ The genius of Cardinal de Retz had a right to paint
a conclave, (of 1665,) in which he was a spectator and an actor,
(Mémoires, tom. iv. p. 15—57;) but I am at a loss to appreciate
the knowledge or authority of an anonymous Italian, whose history
(Conclavi de’ Pontifici Romani, in 4to. 1667) has been continued
since the reign of Alexander VII. The accidental form of the work
furnishes a lesson, though not an antidote, to ambition. From a
labyrinth of intrigues, we emerge to the adoration of the
successful candidate; but the next page opens with his funeral.]
72 (return) [ The expressions of Cardinal de Retz are positive
and picturesque: On y vecut toujours ensemble avec le même
respect, et la même civilité que l’on observe dans le cabinet des
rois, avec la même politesse qu’on avoit dans la cour de Henri
III., avec la même familiarité que l’on voit dans les colleges;
avec la même modestie, qui se remarque dans les noviciats; et
avec la même charité, du moins en apparence, qui pourroit ètre
entre des frères parfaitement unis.]
73 (return) [ Richiesti per bando (says John Villani) sanatori di
Roma, e 52 del popolo, et capitani de’ 25, e consoli,
(_consoli?_) et 13 buone huomini, uno per rione. Our knowledge is
too imperfect to pronounce how much of this constitution was
temporary, and how much ordinary and permanent. Yet it is faintly
illustrated by the ancient statutes of Rome.]
74 (return) [ Villani (l. x. c. 68—71, in Muratori, Script. tom.
xiii. p. 641—645) relates this law, and the whole transaction,
with much less abhorrence than the prudent Muratori. Any one
conversant with the darker ages must have observed how much the
sense (I mean the nonsense) of superstition is fluctuating and
inconsistent.]
75 (return) [ In the first volume of the Popes of Avignon, see
the second original Life of John XXII. p. 142—145, the confession
of the antipope p. 145—152, and the laborious notes of Baluze, p.
714, 715.]
Had the election been always held in the Vatican, the rights of
the senate and people would not have been violated with impunity.
But the Romans forgot, and were forgotten. in the absence of the
successors of Gregory the Seventh, who did not keep as a divine
precept their ordinary residence in the city and diocese. The
care of that diocese was less important than the government of
the universal church; nor could the popes delight in a city in
which their authority was always opposed, and their person was
often endangered. From the persecution of the emperors, and the
wars of Italy, they escaped beyond the Alps into the hospitable
bosom of France; from the tumults of Rome they prudently withdrew
to live and die in the more tranquil stations of Anagni, Perugia,
Viterbo, and the adjacent cities. When the flock was offended or
impoverished by the absence of the shepherd, they were recalled
by a stern admonition, that St. Peter had fixed his chair, not in
an obscure village, but in the capital of the world; by a
ferocious menace, that the Romans would march in arms to destroy
the place and people that should dare to afford them a retreat.
They returned with timorous obedience; and were saluted with the
account of a heavy debt, of all the losses which their desertion
had occasioned, the hire of lodgings, the sale of provisions, and
the various expenses of servants and strangers who attended the
court. 76 After a short interval of peace, and perhaps of
authority, they were again banished by new tumults, and again
summoned by the imperious or respectful invitation of the senate.
In these occasional retreats, the exiles and fugitives of the
Vatican were seldom long, or far, distant from the metropolis;
but in the beginning of the fourteenth century, the apostolic
throne was transported, as it might seem forever, from the Tyber
to the Rhône; and the cause of the transmigration may be deduced
from the furious contest between Boniface the Eighth and the king
of France. 77 The spiritual arms of excommunication and interdict
were repulsed by the union of the three estates, and the
privileges of the Gallican church; but the pope was not prepared
against the carnal weapons which Philip the Fair had courage to
employ. As the pope resided at Anagni, without the suspicion of
danger, his palace and person were assaulted by three hundred
horse, who had been secretly levied by William of Nogaret, a
French minister, and Sciarra Colonna, of a noble but hostile
family of Rome. The cardinals fled; the inhabitants of Anagni
were seduced from their allegiance and gratitude; but the
dauntless Boniface, unarmed and alone, seated himself in his
chair, and awaited, like the conscript fathers of old, the swords
of the Gauls. Nogaret, a foreign adversary, was content to
execute the orders of his master: by the domestic enmity of
Colonna, he was insulted with words and blows; and during a
confinement of three days his life was threatened by the
hardships which they inflicted on the obstinacy which they
provoked. Their strange delay gave time and courage to the
adherents of the church, who rescued him from sacrilegious
violence; but his imperious soul was wounded in the vital part;
and Boniface expired at Rome in a frenzy of rage and revenge. His
memory is stained with the glaring vices of avarice and pride;
nor has the courage of a martyr promoted this ecclesiastical
champion to the honors of a saint; a magnanimous sinner, (say the
chronicles of the times,) who entered like a fox, reigned like a
lion, and died like a dog. He was succeeded by Benedict the
Eleventh, the mildest of mankind. Yet he excommunicated the
impious emissaries of Philip, and devoted the city and people of
Anagni by a tremendous curse, whose effects are still visible to
the eyes of superstition. 78
76 (return) [ Romani autem non valentes nec volentes ultra suam
celare cupiditatem gravissimam, contra papam movere cperunt
questionem, exigentes ab eo urgentissime omnia quæ subierant per
ejus absentiam damna et jacturas, videlicet in hispitiis
locandis, in mercimoniis, in usuris, in redditibus, in
provisionibus, et in aliis modis innumerabilibus. Quòd cum
audisset papa, præcordialiter ingemuit, et se comperiens
_muscipulatum_, &c., Matt. Paris, p. 757. For the ordinary
history of the popes, their life and death, their residence and
absence, it is enough to refer to the ecclesiastical annalists,
Spondanus and Fleury.]
77 (return) [ Besides the general historians of the church of
Italy and of France, we possess a valuable treatise composed by a
learned friend of Thuanus, which his last and best editors have
published in the appendix (Histoire particulière du grand
Différend entre Boniface VIII et Philippe le Bel, par Pierre du
Puis, tom. vii. P. xi. p. 61—82.)]
78 (return) [ It is difficult to know whether Labat (tom. iv. p.
53—57) be in jest or in earnest, when he supposes that Anagni
still feels the weight of this curse, and that the cornfields, or
vineyards, or olive-trees, are annually blasted by Nature, the
obsequious handmaid of the popes.]
Chapter LXIX: State Of Rome From The Twelfth Century.—Part IV.
After his decease, the tedious and equal suspense of the conclave
was fixed by the dexterity of the French faction. A specious
offer was made and accepted, that, in the term of forty days,
they would elect one of the three candidates who should be named
by their opponents. The archbishop of Bourdeaux, a furious enemy
of his king and country, was the first on the list; but his
ambition was known; and his conscience obeyed the calls of
fortune and the commands of a benefactor, who had been informed
by a swift messenger that the choice of a pope was now in his
hands. The terms were regulated in a private interview; and with
such speed and secrecy was the business transacted, that the
unanimous conclave applauded the elevation of Clement the Fifth.
79 The cardinals of both parties were soon astonished by a
summons to attend him beyond the Alps; from whence, as they soon
discovered, they must never hope to return. He was engaged, by
promise and affection, to prefer the residence of France; and,
after dragging his court through Poitou and Gascony, and
devouring, by his expense, the cities and convents on the road,
he finally reposed at Avignon, 80 which flourished above seventy
years 81 the seat of the Roman pontiff and the metropolis of
Christendom. By land, by sea, by the Rhône, the position of
Avignon was on all sides accessible; the southern provinces of
France do not yield to Italy itself; new palaces arose for the
accommodation of the pope and cardinals; and the arts of luxury
were soon attracted by the treasures of the church. They were
already possessed of the adjacent territory, the Venaissin
county, 82 a populous and fertile spot; and the sovereignty of
Avignon was afterwards purchased from the youth and distress of
Jane, the first queen of Naples and countess of Provence, for the
inadequate price of fourscore thousand florins. 83 Under the
shadow of a French monarchy, amidst an obedient people, the popes
enjoyed an honorable and tranquil state, to which they long had
been strangers: but Italy deplored their absence; and Rome, in
solitude and poverty, might repent of the ungovernable freedom
which had driven from the Vatican the successor of St. Peter. Her
repentance was tardy and fruitless: after the death of the old
members, the sacred college was filled with French cardinals, 84
who beheld Rome and Italy with abhorrence and contempt, and
perpetuated a series of national, and even provincial, popes,
attached by the most indissoluble ties to their native country.
79 (return) [ See, in the Chronicle of Giovanni Villani, (l.
viii. c. 63, 64, 80, in Muratori, tom. xiii.,) the imprisonment
of Boniface VIII., and the election of Clement V., the last of
which, like most anecdotes, is embarrassed with some
difficulties.]
80 (return) [ The original lives of the eight popes of Avignon,
Clement V., John XXII., Benedict XI., Clement VI., Innocent VI.,
Urban V., Gregory XI., and Clement VII., are published by Stephen
Baluze, (Vitæ Paparum Avenionensium; Paris, 1693, 2 vols. in
4to.,) with copious and elaborate notes, and a second volume of
acts and documents. With the true zeal of an editor and a
patriot, he devoutly justifies or excuses the characters of his
countrymen.]
81 (return) [ The exile of Avignon is compared by the Italians
with Babylon, and the Babylonish captivity. Such furious
metaphors, more suitable to the ardor of Petrarch than to the
judgment of Muratori, are gravely refuted in Baluze’s preface.
The abbé de Sade is distracted between the love of Petrarch and
of his country. Yet he modestly pleads, that many of the local
inconveniences of Avignon are now removed; and many of the vices
against which the poet declaims, had been imported with the Roman
court by the strangers of Italy, (tom. i. p. 23—28.)]
82 (return) [ The comtat Venaissin was ceded to the popes in 1273
by Philip III. king of France, after he had inherited the
dominions of the count of Thoulouse. Forty years before, the
heresy of Count Raymond had given them a pretence of seizure, and
they derived some obscure claim from the xith century to some
lands citra Rhodanum, (Valesii Notitia Galliarum, p. 495, 610.
Longuerue, Description de la France, tom. i. p. 376—381.)]
83 (return) [ If a possession of four centuries were not itself a
title, such objections might annul the bargain; but the purchase
money must be refunded, for indeed it was paid. Civitatem
Avenionem emit.... per ejusmodi venditionem pecuniâ redundates,
&c., (iida Vita Clement. VI. in Baluz. tom. i. p. 272. Muratori,
Script. tom. iii. P. ii. p. 565.) The only temptation for Jane
and her second husband was ready money, and without it they could
not have returned to the throne of Naples.]
84 (return) [ Clement V immediately promoted ten cardinals, nine
French and one English, (Vita ivta, p. 63, et Baluz. p. 625, &c.)
In 1331, the pope refused two candidates recommended by the king
of France, quod xx. Cardinales, de quibus xvii. de regno Franciæ
originem traxisse noscuntur in memorato collegio existant,
(Thomassin, Discipline de l’Eglise, tom. i. p. 1281.)]
The progress of industry had produced and enriched the Italian
republics: the æra of their liberty is the most flourishing
period of population and agriculture, of manufactures and
commerce; and their mechanic labors were gradually refined into
the arts of elegance and genius. But the position of Rome was
less favorable, the territory less fruitful: the character of the
inhabitants was debased by indolence and elated by pride; and
they fondly conceived that the tribute of subjects must forever
nourish the metropolis of the church and empire. This prejudice
was encouraged in some degree by the resort of pilgrims to the
shrines of the apostles; and the last legacy of the popes, the
institution of the holy year, 85 was not less beneficial to the
people than to the clergy. Since the loss of Palestine, the gift
of plenary indulgences, which had been applied to the crusades,
remained without an object; and the most valuable treasure of the
church was sequestered above eight years from public circulation.
A new channel was opened by the diligence of Boniface the Eighth,
who reconciled the vices of ambition and avarice; and the pope
had sufficient learning to recollect and revive the secular games
which were celebrated in Rome at the conclusion of every century.
To sound without danger the depth of popular credulity, a sermon
was seasonably pronounced, a report was artfully scattered, some
aged witnesses were produced; and on the first of January of the
year thirteen hundred, the church of St. Peter was crowded with
the faithful, who demanded the customary indulgence of the holy
time. The pontiff, who watched and irritated their devout
impatience, was soon persuaded by ancient testimony of the
justice of their claim; and he proclaimed a plenary absolution to
all Catholics who, in the course of that year, and at every
similar period, should respectfully visit the apostolic churches
of St. Peter and St. Paul. The welcome sound was propagated
through Christendom; and at first from the nearest provinces of
Italy, and at length from the remote kingdoms of Hungary and
Britain, the highways were thronged with a swarm of pilgrims who
sought to expiate their sins in a journey, however costly or
laborious, which was exempt from the perils of military service.
All exceptions of rank or sex, of age or infirmity, were
forgotten in the common transport; and in the streets and
churches many persons were trampled to death by the eagerness of
devotion. The calculation of their numbers could not be easy nor
accurate; and they have probably been magnified by a dexterous
clergy, well apprised of the contagion of example: yet we are
assured by a judicious historian, who assisted at the ceremony,
that Rome was never replenished with less than two hundred
thousand strangers; and another spectator has fixed at two
millions the total concourse of the year. A trifling oblation
from each individual would accumulate a royal treasure; and two
priests stood night and day, with rakes in their hands, to
collect, without counting, the heaps of gold and silver that were
poured on the altar of St. Paul. 86 It was fortunately a season
of peace and plenty; and if forage was scarce, if inns and
lodgings were extravagantly dear, an inexhaustible supply of
bread and wine, of meat and fish, was provided by the policy of
Boniface and the venal hospitality of the Romans. From a city
without trade or industry, all casual riches will speedily
evaporate: but the avarice and envy of the next generation
solicited Clement the Sixth 87 to anticipate the distant period
of the century. The gracious pontiff complied with their wishes;
afforded Rome this poor consolation for his loss; and justified
the change by the name and practice of the Mosaic Jubilee. 88 His
summons was obeyed; and the number, zeal, and liberality of the
pilgrims did not yield to the primitive festival. But they
encountered the triple scourge of war, pestilence, and famine:
many wives and virgins were violated in the castles of Italy; and
many strangers were pillaged or murdered by the savage Romans, no
longer moderated by the presence of their bishops. 89 To the
impatience of the popes we may ascribe the successive reduction
to fifty, thirty-three, and twenty-five years; although the
second of these terms is commensurate with the life of Christ.
The profusion of indulgences, the revolt of the Protestants, and
the decline of superstition, have much diminished the value of
the jubilee; yet even the nineteenth and last festival was a year
of pleasure and profit to the Romans; and a philosophic smile
will not disturb the triumph of the priest or the happiness of
the people. 90
85 (return) [ Our primitive account is from Cardinal James
Caietan, (Maxima Bibliot. Patrum, tom. xxv.;) and I am at a loss
to determine whether the nephew of Boniface VIII. be a fool or a
knave: the uncle is a much clearer character.]
86 (return) [ See John Villani (l. viii. c. 36) in the xiith, and
the Chronicon Astense, in the xith volume (p. 191, 192) of
Muratori’s Collection Papa innumerabilem pecuniam ab eisdem
accepit, nam duo clerici, cum rastris, &c.]
87 (return) [ The two bulls of Boniface VIII. and Clement VI. are
inserted on the Corpus Juris Canonici, Extravagant. (Commun. l.
v. tit. ix c 1, 2.)]
88 (return) [ The sabbatic years and jubilees of the Mosaic law,
(Car. Sigon. de Republica Hebræorum, Opp. tom. iv. l. iii. c. 14,
14, p. 151, 152,) the suspension of all care and labor, the
periodical release of lands, debts, servitude, &c., may seem a
noble idea, but the execution would be impracticable in a
_profane_ republic; and I should be glad to learn that this
ruinous festival was observed by the Jewish people.]
89 (return) [ See the Chronicle of Matteo Villani, (l. i. c. 56,)
in the xivth vol. of Muratori, and the Mémoires sur la Vie de
Pétrarque, tom. iii. p. 75—89.]
90 (return) [ The subject is exhausted by M. Chais, a French
minister at the Hague, in his Lettres Historiques et Dogmatiques,
sur les Jubilés et es Indulgences; la Haye, 1751, 3 vols. in
12mo.; an elaborate and pleasing work, had not the author
preferred the character of a polemic to that of a philosopher.]
In the beginning of the eleventh century, Italy was exposed to
the feudal tyranny, alike oppressive to the sovereign and the
people. The rights of human nature were vindicated by her
numerous republics, who soon extended their liberty and dominion
from the city to the adjacent country. The sword of the nobles
was broken; their slaves were enfranchised; their castles were
demolished; they assumed the habits of society and obedience;
their ambition was confined to municipal honors, and in the
proudest aristocracy of Venice on Genoa, each patrician was
subject to the laws. 91 But the feeble and disorderly government
of Rome was unequal to the task of curbing her rebellious sons,
who scorned the authority of the magistrate within and without
the walls. It was no longer a civil contention between the nobles
and plebeians for the government of the state: the barons
asserted in arms their personal independence; their palaces and
castles were fortified against a siege; and their private
quarrels were maintained by the numbers of their vassals and
retainers. In origin and affection, they were aliens to their
country: 92 and a genuine Roman, could such have been produced,
might have renounced these haughty strangers, who disdained the
appellation of citizens, and proudly styled themselves the
princes, of Rome. 93 After a dark series of revolutions, all
records of pedigree were lost; the distinction of surnames was
abolished; the blood of the nations was mingled in a thousand
channels; and the Goths and Lombards, the Greeks and Franks, the
Germans and Normans, had obtained the fairest possessions by
royal bounty, or the prerogative of valor. These examples might
be readily presumed; but the elevation of a Hebrew race to the
rank of senators and consuls is an event without a parallel in
the long captivity of these miserable exiles. 94 In the time of
Leo the Ninth, a wealthy and learned Jew was converted to
Christianity, and honored at his baptism with the name of his
godfather, the reigning Pope. The zeal and courage of Peter the
son of Leo were signalized in the cause of Gregory the Seventh,
who intrusted his faithful adherent with the government of
Adrian’s mole, the tower of Crescentius, or, as it is now called,
the castle of St. Angelo. Both the father and the son were the
parents of a numerous progeny: their riches, the fruits of usury,
were shared with the noblest families of the city; and so
extensive was their alliance, that the grandson of the proselyte
was exalted by the weight of his kindred to the throne of St.
Peter. A majority of the clergy and people supported his cause:
he reigned several years in the Vatican; and it is only the
eloquence of St. Bernard, and the final triumph of Innocence the
Second, that has branded Anacletus with the epithet of antipope.
After his defeat and death, the posterity of Leo is no longer
conspicuous; and none will be found of the modern nobles
ambitious of descending from a Jewish stock. It is not my design
to enumerate the Roman families which have failed at different
periods, or those which are continued in different degrees of
splendor to the present time. 95 The old consular line of the
_Frangipani_ discover their name in the generous act of
_breaking_ or dividing bread in a time of famine; and such
benevolence is more truly glorious than to have enclosed, with
their allies the _Corsi_, a spacious quarter of the city in the
chains of their fortifications; the _Savelli_, as it should seem
a Sabine race, have maintained their original dignity; the
obsolete surname of the _Capizucchi_ is inscribed on the coins of
the first senators; the _Conti_ preserve the honor, without the
estate, of the counts of Signia; and the _Annibaldi_ must have
been very ignorant, or very modest, if they had not descended
from the Carthaginian hero. 96
91 (return) [ Muratori (Dissert. xlvii.) alleges the Annals of
Florence, Padua, Genoa, &c., the analogy of the rest, the
evidence of Otho of Frisingen, (de Gest. Fred. I. l. ii. c. 13,)
and the submission of the marquis of Este.]
92 (return) [ As early as the year 824, the emperor Lothaire I.
found it expedient to interrogate the Roman people, to learn from
each individual by what national law he chose to be governed.
(Muratori, Dissertat xxii.)]
93 (return) [ Petrarch attacks these foreigners, the tyrants of
Rome, in a declamation or epistle, full of bold truths and absurd
pedantry, in which he applies the maxims, and even prejudices, of
the old republic to the state of the xivth century, (Mémoires,
tom. iii. p. 157—169.)]
94 (return) [ The origin and adventures of the Jewish family are
noticed by Pagi, (Critica, tom. iv. p. 435, A.D. 1124, No. 3, 4,)
who draws his information from the Chronographus Maurigniacensis,
and Arnulphus Sagiensis de Schismate, (in Muratori, Script. Ital.
tom. iii. P. i. p. 423—432.) The fact must in some degree be
true; yet I could wish that it had been coolly related, before it
was turned into a reproach against the antipope.]
95 (return) [ Muratori has given two dissertations (xli. and
xlii.) to the names, surnames, and families of Italy. Some
nobles, who glory in their domestic fables, may be offended with
his firm and temperate criticism; yet surely some ounces of pure
gold are of more value than many pounds of base metal.]
96 (return) [ The cardinal of St. George, in his poetical, or
rather metrical history of the election and coronation of
Boniface VIII., (Muratori Script. Ital. tom. iii. P. i. p. 641,
&c.,) describes the state and families of Rome at the coronation
of Boniface VIII., (A.D. 1295.)
Interea titulis redimiti sanguine et armis Illustresque
viri Romanâ a stirpe trahentes Nomen in emeritos tantæ
virtutis honores Insulerant sese medios festumque
colebant Aurata fulgente togâ, sociante catervâ. Ex
ipsis devota domus præstantis ab _Ursâ_ Ecclesiæ,
vultumque gerens demissius altum Festa _Columna_ jocis,
necnon _Sabellia_ mitis; Stephanides senior, _Comites_,
_Annibalica_ proles, Præfectusque urbis magnum sine
viribus nomen. (l. ii. c. 5, 100, p. 647, 648.)
The ancient statutes of Rome (l. iii. c. 59, p. 174, 175)
distinguish eleven families of barons, who are obliged to swear
in concilio communi, before the senator, that they would not
harbor or protect any malefactors, outlaws, &c.—a feeble
security!]
But among, perhaps above, the peers and princes of the city, I
distinguish the rival houses of Colonna and Ursini, whose private
story is an essential part of the annals of modern Rome. I. The
name and arms of Colonna 97 have been the theme of much doubtful
etymology; nor have the orators and antiquarians overlooked
either Trajan’s pillar, or the columns of Hercules, or the pillar
of Christ’s flagellation, or the luminous column that guided the
Israelites in the desert. Their first historical appearance in
the year eleven hundred and four attests the power and antiquity,
while it explains the simple meaning, of the name. By the
usurpation of Cavæ, the Colonna provoked the arms of Paschal the
Second; but they lawfully held in the Campagna of Rome the
hereditary fiefs of Zagarola and _Colonna_; and the latter of
these towns was probably adorned with some lofty pillar, the
relic of a villa or temple. 98 They likewise possessed one moiety
of the neighboring city of Tusculum, a strong presumption of
their descent from the counts of Tusculum, who in the tenth
century were the tyrants of the apostolic see. According to their
own and the public opinion, the primitive and remote source was
derived from the banks of the Rhine; 99 and the sovereigns of
Germany were not ashamed of a real or fabulous affinity with a
noble race, which in the revolutions of seven hundred years has
been often illustrated by merit and always by fortune. 100 About
the end of the thirteenth century, the most powerful branch was
composed of an uncle and six bothers, all conspicuous in arms, or
in the honors of the church. Of these, Peter was elected senator
of Rome, introduced to the Capitol in a triumphal car, and hailed
in some vain acclamations with the title of Cæsar; while John and
Stephen were declared marquis of Ancona and count of Romagna, by
Nicholas the Fourth, a patron so partial to their family, that he
has been delineated in satirical portraits, imprisoned as it were
in a hollow pillar. 101 After his decease their haughty behavior
provoked the displeasure of the most implacable of mankind. The
two cardinals, the uncle and the nephew, denied the election of
Boniface the Eighth; and the Colonna were oppressed for a moment
by his temporal and spiritual arms. 102 He proclaimed a crusade
against his personal enemies; their estates were confiscated;
their fortresses on either side of the Tyber were besieged by the
troops of St. Peter and those of the rival nobles; and after the
ruin of Palestrina or Præneste, their principal seat, the ground
was marked with a ploughshare, the emblem of perpetual
desolation. Degraded, banished, proscribed, the six brothers, in
disguise and danger, wandered over Europe without renouncing the
hope of deliverance and revenge. In this double hope, the French
court was their surest asylum; they prompted and directed the
enterprise of Philip; and I should praise their magnanimity, had
they respected the misfortune and courage of the captive tyrant.
His civil acts were annulled by the Roman people, who restored
the honors and possessions of the Colonna; and some estimate may
be formed of their wealth by their losses, of their losses by the
damages of one hundred thousand gold florins which were granted
them against the accomplices and heirs of the deceased pope. All
the spiritual censures and disqualifications were abolished 103
by his prudent successors; and the fortune of the house was more
firmly established by this transient hurricane. The boldness of
Sciarra Colonna was signalized in the captivity of Boniface, and
long afterwards in the coronation of Lewis of Bavaria; and by the
gratitude of the emperor, the pillar in their arms was encircled
with a royal crown. But the first of the family in fame and merit
was the elder Stephen, whom Petrarch loved and esteemed as a hero
superior to his own times, and not unworthy of ancient Rome.
Persecution and exile displayed to the nations his abilities in
peace and war; in his distress he was an object, not of pity, but
of reverence; the aspect of danger provoked him to avow his name
and country; and when he was asked, “Where is now your fortress?”
he laid his hand on his heart, and answered, “Here.” He supported
with the same virtue the return of prosperity; and, till the ruin
of his declining age, the ancestors, the character, and the
children of Stephen Colonna, exalted his dignity in the Roman
republic, and at the court of Avignon. II. The Ursini migrated
from Spoleto; 104 the sons of Ursus, as they are styled in the
twelfth century, from some eminent person, who is only known as
the father of their race. But they were soon distinguished among
the nobles of Rome, by the number and bravery of their kinsmen,
the strength of their towers, the honors of the senate and sacred
college, and the elevation of two popes, Celestin the Third and
Nicholas the Third, of their name and lineage. 105 Their riches
may be accused as an early abuse of nepotism: the estates of St.
Peter were alienated in their favor by the liberal Celestin; 106
and Nicholas was ambitious for their sake to solicit the alliance
of monarchs; to found new kingdoms in Lombardy and Tuscany; and
to invest them with the perpetual office of senators of Rome. All
that has been observed of the greatness of the Colonna will
likewise redound to the glory of the Ursini, their constant and
equal antagonists in the long hereditary feud, which distracted
above two hundred and fifty years the ecclesiastical state. The
jealously of preeminence and power was the true ground of their
quarrel; but as a specious badge of distinction, the Colonna
embraced the name of Ghibelines and the party of the empire; the
Ursini espoused the title of Guelphs and the cause of the church.
The eagle and the keys were displayed in their adverse banners;
and the two factions of Italy most furiously raged when the
origin and nature of the dispute were long since forgotten. 107
After the retreat of the popes to Avignon they disputed in arms
the vacant republic; and the mischiefs of discord were
perpetuated by the wretched compromise of electing each year two
rival senators. By their private hostilities the city and country
were desolated, and the fluctuating balance inclined with their
alternate success. But none of either family had fallen by the
sword, till the most renowned champion of the Ursini was
surprised and slain by the younger Stephen Colonna. 108 His
triumph is stained with the reproach of violating the truce;
their defeat was basely avenged by the assassination, before the
church door, of an innocent boy and his two servants. Yet the
victorious Colonna, with an annual colleague, was declared
senator of Rome during the term of five years. And the muse of
Petrarch inspired a wish, a hope, a prediction, that the generous
youth, the son of his venerable hero, would restore Rome and
Italy to their pristine glory; that his justice would extirpate
the wolves and lions, the serpents and _bears_, who labored to
subvert the eternal basis of the marble column. 109
97 (return) [ It is pity that the Colonna themselves have not
favored the world with a complete and critical history of their
illustrious house. I adhere to Muratori, (Dissert. xlii. tom.
iii. p. 647, 648.)]
98 (return) [ Pandulph. Pisan. in Vit. Paschal. II. in Muratori,
Script. Ital. tom. iii. P. i. p. 335. The family has still great
possessions in the Campagna of Rome; but they have alienated to
the Rospigliosi this original fief of _Colonna_, (Eschinard, p.
258, 259.)]
99 (return) [ “Te longinqua dedit tellus et pascua Rheni,” says
Petrarch; and, in 1417, a duke of Guelders and Juliers
acknowledges (Lenfant, Hist. du Concile de Constance, tom. ii. p.
539) his descent from the ancestors of Martin V., (Otho Colonna:)
but the royal author of the Memoirs of Brandenburg observes, that
the sceptre in his arms has been confounded with the column. To
maintain the Roman origin of the Colonna, it was ingeniously
supposed (Diario di Monaldeschi, in the Script. Ital. tom. xii.
p. 533) that a cousin of the emperor Nero escaped from the city,
and founded Mentz in Germany.]
100 (return) [ I cannot overlook the Roman triumph of ovation on
Marce Antonio Colonna, who had commanded the pope’s galleys at
the naval victory of Lepanto, (Thuan. Hist. l. 7, tom. iii. p.
55, 56. Muret. Oratio x. Opp. tom. i. p. 180—190.)]
101 (return) [ Muratori, Annali d’Italia, tom. x. p. 216, 220.]
102 (return) [ Petrarch’s attachment to the Colonna has
authorized the abbé de Sade to expatiate on the state of the
family in the fourteenth century, the persecution of Boniface
VIII., the character of Stephen and his sons, their quarrels with
the Ursini, &c., (Mémoires sur Pétrarque, tom. i. p. 98—110,
146—148, 174—176, 222—230, 275—280.) His criticism often
rectifies the hearsay stories of Villani, and the errors of the
less diligent moderns. I understand the branch of Stephen to be
now extinct.]
103 (return) [ Alexander III. had declared the Colonna who
adhered to the emperor Frederic I. incapable of holding any
ecclesiastical benefice, (Villani, l. v. c. 1;) and the last
stains of annual excommunication were purified by Sixtus V.,
(Vita di Sisto V. tom. iii. p. 416.) Treason, sacrilege, and
proscription are often the best titles of ancient nobility.]
104 (return) [
————Vallis te proxima misit, Appenninigenæ qua prata
virentia sylvæ Spoletana metunt armenta gregesque
protervi.
Monaldeschi (tom. xii. Script. Ital. p. 533) gives the Ursini a
French origin, which may be remotely true.]
105 (return) [ In the metrical life of Celestine V. by the
cardinal of St. George (Muratori, tom. iii. P. i. p. 613, &c.,)
we find a luminous, and not inelegant, passage, (l. i. c. 3, p.
203 &c.:)—
————genuit quem nobilis Ursæ (_Ursi?_) Progenies, Romana
domus, veterataque magnis Fascibus in clero, pompasque
experta senatûs, Bellorumque manû grandi stipata
parentum Cardineos apices necnon fastigia dudum Papatûs
_iterata_ tenens.
Muratori (Dissert. xlii. tom. iii.) observes, that the first
Ursini pontificate of Celestine III. was unknown: he is inclined
to read _Ursi_ progenies.]
106 (return) [ Filii Ursi, quondam Clestini papæ nepotes, de
bonis ecclesiæ Romanæ ditati, (Vit. Innocent. III. in Muratori,
Script. tom. iii. P. i.) The partial prodigality of Nicholas III.
is more conspicuous in Villani and Muratori. Yet the Ursini would
disdain the nephews of a _modern_ pope.]
107 (return) [ In his fifty-first Dissertation on the Italian
Antiquities, Muratori explains the factions of the Guelphs and
Ghibelines.]
108 (return) [ Petrarch (tom. i. p. 222—230) has celebrated this
victory according to the Colonna; but two contemporaries, a
Florentine (Giovanni Villani, l. x. c. 220) and a Roman,
(Ludovico Monaldeschi, p. 532—534,) are less favorable to their
arms.]
109 (return) [ The abbé de Sade (tom. i. Notes, p. 61—66) has
applied the vith Canzone of Petrarch, _Spirto Gentil_, &c., to
Stephen Colonna the younger:
Orsi, lupi, leoni, aquile e serpi Al una gran marmorea
_colexna_ Fanno noja sovente e à se danno.]
Chapter LXX: Final Settlement Of The Ecclesiastical State.—Part
I.
Character And Coronation Of Petrarch.—Restoration Of The Freedom
And Government Of Rome By The Tribune Rienzi.—His Virtues And
Vices, His Expulsion And Death.—Return Of The Popes From
Avignon.—Great Schism Of The West.—Reunion Of The Latin
Church.—Last Struggles Of Roman Liberty.— Statutes Of Rome.—Final
Settlement Of The Ecclesiastical State.
In the apprehension of modern times, Petrarch 1 is the Italian
songster of Laura and love. In the harmony of his Tuscan rhymes,
Italy applauds, or rather adores, the father of her lyric poetry;
and his verse, or at least his name, is repeated by the
enthusiasm, or affectation, of amorous sensibility. Whatever may
be the private taste of a stranger, his slight and superficial
knowledge should humbly acquiesce in the judgment of a learned
nation; yet I may hope or presume, that the Italians do not
compare the tedious uniformity of sonnets and elegies with the
sublime compositions of their epic muse, the original wildness of
Dante, the regular beauties of Tasso, and the boundless variety
of the incomparable Ariosto. The merits of the lover I am still
less qualified to appreciate: nor am I deeply interested in a
metaphysical passion for a nymph so shadowy, that her existence
has been questioned; 2 for a matron so prolific, 3 that she was
delivered of eleven legitimate children, 4 while her amorous
swain sighed and sung at the fountain of Vaucluse. 5 But in the
eyes of Petrarch, and those of his graver contemporaries, his
love was a sin, and Italian verse a frivolous amusement. His
Latin works of philosophy, poetry, and eloquence, established his
serious reputation, which was soon diffused from Avignon over
France and Italy: his friends and disciples were multiplied in
every city; and if the ponderous volume of his writings 6 be now
abandoned to a long repose, our gratitude must applaud the man,
who by precept and example revived the spirit and study of the
Augustan age. From his earliest youth, Petrarch aspired to the
poetic crown. The academical honors of the three faculties had
introduced a royal degree of master or doctor in the art of
poetry; 7 and the title of poet-laureate, which custom, rather
than vanity, perpetuates in the English court, 8 was first
invented by the Cæsars of Germany. In the musical games of
antiquity, a prize was bestowed on the victor: 9 the belief that
Virgil and Horace had been crowned in the Capitol inflamed the
emulation of a Latin bard; 10 and the laurel 11 was endeared to
the lover by a verbal resemblance with the name of his mistress.
The value of either object was enhanced by the difficulties of
the pursuit; and if the virtue or prudence of Laura was
inexorable, 12 he enjoyed, and might boast of enjoying, the nymph
of poetry. His vanity was not of the most delicate kind, since he
applauds the success of his own _labors_; his name was popular;
his friends were active; the open or secret opposition of envy
and prejudice was surmounted by the dexterity of patient merit.
In the thirty-sixth year of his age, he was solicited to accept
the object of his wishes; and on the same day, in the solitude of
Vaucluse, he received a similar and solemn invitation from the
senate of Rome and the university of Paris. The learning of a
theological school, and the ignorance of a lawless city, were
alike unqualified to bestow the ideal though immortal wreath
which genius may obtain from the free applause of the public and
of posterity: but the candidate dismissed this troublesome
reflection; and after some moments of complacency and suspense,
preferred the summons of the metropolis of the world.
1 (return) [ The Mémoires sur la Vie de François Pétrarque,
(Amsterdam, 1764, 1767, 3 vols. in 4to.,) form a copious,
original, and entertaining work, a labor of love, composed from
the accurate study of Petrarch and his contemporaries; but the
hero is too often lost in the general history of the age, and the
author too often languishes in the affectation of politeness and
gallantry. In the preface to his first volume, he enumerates and
weighs twenty Italian biographers, who have professedly treated
of the same subject.]
2 (return) [ The allegorical interpretation prevailed in the xvth
century; but the wise commentators were not agreed whether they
should understand by Laura, religion, or virtue, or the blessed
virgin, or————. See the prefaces to the first and second volume.]
3 (return) [ Laure de Noves, born about the year 1307, was
married in January 1325, to Hugues de Sade, a noble citizen of
Avignon, whose jealousy was not the effect of love, since he
married a second wife within seven months of her death, which
happened the 6th of April, 1348, precisely one-and-twenty years
after Petrarch had seen and loved her.]
4 (return) [ Corpus crebris partubus exhaustum: from one of these
is issued, in the tenth degree, the abbé de Sade, the fond and
grateful biographer of Petrarch; and this domestic motive most
probably suggested the idea of his work, and urged him to inquire
into every circumstance that could affect the history and
character of his grandmother, (see particularly tom. i. p.
122—133, notes, p. 7—58, tom. ii. p. 455—495 not. p. 76—82.)]
5 (return) [ Vaucluse, so familiar to our English travellers, is
described from the writings of Petrarch, and the local knowledge
of his biographer, (Mémoires, tom. i. p. 340—359.) It was, in
truth, the retreat of a hermit; and the moderns are much
mistaken, if they place Laura and a happy lover in the grotto.]
6 (return) [ Of 1250 pages, in a close print, at Basil in the
xvith century, but without the date of the year. The abbé de Sade
calls aloud for a new edition of Petrarch’s Latin works; but I
much doubt whether it would redound to the profit of the
bookseller, or the amusement of the public.]
7 (return) [ Consult Selden’s Titles of Honor, in his works,
(vol. iii. p. 457—466.) A hundred years before Petrarch, St.
Francis received the visit of a poet, qui ab imperatore fuerat
coronatus et exinde rex versuum dictus.]
8 (return) [ From Augustus to Louis, the muse has too often been
false and venal: but I much doubt whether any age or court can
produce a similar establishment of a stipendiary poet, who in
every reign, and at all events, is bound to furnish twice a year
a measure of praise and verse, such as may be sung in the chapel,
and, I believe, in the presence, of the sovereign. I speak the
more freely, as the best time for abolishing this ridiculous
custom is while the prince is a man of virtue and the poet a man
of genius.]
9 (return) [ Isocrates (in Panegyrico, tom. i. p. 116, 117, edit.
Battie, Cantab. 1729) claims for his native Athens the glory of
first instituting and recommending the alwnaV—kai ta aqla
megista—mh monon tacouV kai rwmhV, alla kai logwn kai gnwmhV. The
example of the Panathenæa was imitated at Delphi; but the Olympic
games were ignorant of a musical crown, till it was extorted by
the vain tyranny of Nero, (Sueton. in Nerone, c. 23; Philostrat.
apud Casaubon ad locum; Dion Cassius, or Xiphilin, l. lxiii. p.
1032, 1041. Potter’s Greek Antiquities, vol. i. p. 445, 450.)]
10 (return) [ The Capitoline games (certamen quinquenale,
_musicum_, equestre, gymnicum) were instituted by Domitian
(Sueton. c. 4) in the year of Christ 86, (Censorin. de Die
Natali, c. 18, p. 100, edit. Havercamp.) and were not abolished
in the ivth century, (Ausonius de Professoribus Burdegal. V.) If
the crown were given to superior merit, the exclusion of Statius
(Capitolia nostræ inficiata lyræ, Sylv. l. iii. v. 31) may do
honor to the games of the Capitol; but the Latin poets who lived
before Domitian were crowned only in the public opinion.]
11 (return) [ Petrarch and the senators of Rome were ignorant
that the laurel was not the Capitoline, but the Delphic crown,
(Plin. Hist. Natur p. 39. Hist. Critique de la République des
Lettres, tom. i. p. 150—220.) The victors in the Capitol were
crowned with a garland of oak eaves, (Martial, l. iv. epigram
54.)]
12 (return) [ The pious grandson of Laura has labored, and not
without success, to vindicate her immaculate chastity against the
censures of the grave and the sneers of the profane, (tom. ii.
notes, p. 76—82.)]
The ceremony of his coronation 13 was performed in the Capitol,
by his friend and patron the supreme magistrate of the republic.
Twelve patrician youths were arrayed in scarlet; six
representatives of the most illustrious families, in green robes,
with garlands of flowers, accompanied the procession; in the
midst of the princes and nobles, the senator, count of
Anguillara, a kinsman of the Colonna, assumed his throne; and at
the voice of a herald Petrarch arose. After discoursing on a text
of Virgil, and thrice repeating his vows for the prosperity of
Rome, he knelt before the throne, and received from the senator a
laurel crown, with a more precious declaration, “This is the
reward of merit.” The people shouted, “Long life to the Capitol
and the poet!” A sonnet in praise of Rome was accepted as the
effusion of genius and gratitude; and after the whole procession
had visited the Vatican, the profane wreath was suspended before
the shrine of St. Peter. In the act or diploma 14 which was
presented to Petrarch, the title and prerogatives of
poet-laureate are revived in the Capitol, after the lapse of
thirteen hundred years; and he receives the perpetual privilege
of wearing, at his choice, a crown of laurel, ivy, or myrtle, of
assuming the poetic habit, and of teaching, disputing,
interpreting, and composing, in all places whatsoever, and on all
subjects of literature. The grant was ratified by the authority
of the senate and people; and the character of citizen was the
recompense of his affection for the Roman name. They did him
honor, but they did him justice. In the familiar society of
Cicero and Livy, he had imbibed the ideas of an ancient patriot;
and his ardent fancy kindled every idea to a sentiment, and every
sentiment to a passion. The aspect of the seven hills and their
majestic ruins confirmed these lively impressions; and he loved a
country by whose liberal spirit he had been crowned and adopted.
The poverty and debasement of Rome excited the indignation and
pity of her grateful son; he dissembled the faults of his
fellow-citizens; applauded with partial fondness the last of
their heroes and matrons; and in the remembrance of the past, in
the hopes of the future, was pleased to forget the miseries of
the present time. Rome was still the lawful mistress of the
world: the pope and the emperor, the bishop and general, had
abdicated their station by an inglorious retreat to the Rhône and
the Danube; but if she could resume her virtue, the republic
might again vindicate her liberty and dominion. Amidst the
indulgence of enthusiasm and eloquence, 15 Petrarch, Italy, and
Europe, were astonished by a revolution which realized for a
moment his most splendid visions. The rise and fall of the
tribune Rienzi will occupy the following pages: 16 the subject is
interesting, the materials are rich, and the glance of a patriot
bard 17 will sometimes vivify the copious, but simple, narrative
of the Florentine, 18 and more especially of the Roman,
historian. 19
13 (return) [ The whole process of Petrarch’s coronation is
accurately described by the abbé de Sade, (tom. i. p. 425—435,
tom. ii. p. 1—6, notes, p. 1—13,) from his own writings, and the
Roman diary of Ludovico, Monaldeschi, without mixing in this
authentic narrative the more recent fables of Sannuccio Delbene.]
14 (return) [ The original act is printed among the Pieces
Justificatives in the Mémoires sur Pétrarque, tom. iii. p.
50—53.]
15 (return) [ To find the proofs of his enthusiasm for Rome, I
need only request that the reader would open, by chance, either
Petrarch, or his French biographer. The latter has described the
poet’s first visit to Rome, (tom. i. p. 323—335.) But in the
place of much idle rhetoric and morality, Petrarch might have
amused the present and future age with an original account of the
city and his coronation.]
16 (return) [ It has been treated by the pen of a Jesuit, the P.
de Cerceau whose posthumous work (Conjuration de Nicolas Gabrini,
dit de Rienzi, Tyran de Rome, en 1347) was published at Paris,
1748, in 12mo. I am indebted to him for some facts and documents
in John Hocsemius, canon of Liege, a contemporary historian,
(Fabricius Bibliot. Lat. Med. Ævi, tom. iii. p. 273, tom. iv. p.
85.)]
17 (return) [ The abbé de Sade, who so freely expatiates on the
history of the xivth century, might treat, as his proper subject,
a revolution in which the heart of Petrarch was so deeply
engaged, (Mémoires, tom. ii. p. 50, 51, 320—417, notes, p. 70—76,
tom. iii. p. 221—243, 366—375.) Not an idea or a fact in the
writings of Petrarch has probably escaped him.]
18 (return) [ Giovanni Villani, l. xii. c. 89, 104, in Muratori,
Rerum Italicarum Scriptores, tom. xiii. p. 969, 970, 981—983.]
19 (return) [ In his third volume of Italian antiquities, (p.
249—548,) Muratori has inserted the Fragmenta Historiæ Romanæ ab
Anno 1327 usque ad Annum 1354, in the original dialect of Rome or
Naples in the xivth century, and a Latin version for the benefit
of strangers. It contains the most particular and authentic life
of Cola (Nicholas) di Rienzi; which had been printed at
Bracciano, 1627, in 4to., under the name of Tomaso Fortifiocca,
who is only mentioned in this work as having been punished by the
tribune for forgery. Human nature is scarcely capable of such
sublime or stupid impartiality: but whosoever in the author of
these Fragments, he wrote on the spot and at the time, and
paints, without design or art, the manners of Rome and the
character of the tribune. * Note: Since the publication of my
first edition of Gibbon, some new and very remarkable documents
have been brought to light in a life of Nicolas Rienzi,—Cola di
Rienzo und seine Zeit,—by Dr. Felix Papencordt. The most
important of these documents are letters from Rienzi to Charles
the Fourth, emperor and king of Bohemia, and to the archbishop of
Praque; they enter into the whole history of his adventurous
career during its first period, and throw a strong light upon his
extraordinary character. These documents were first discovered
and made use of, to a certain extent, by Pelzel, the historian of
Bohemia. The originals have disappeared, but a copy made by
Pelzel for his own use is now in the library of Count Thun at
Teschen. There seems no doubt of their authenticity. Dr.
Papencordt has printed the whole in his Urkunden, with the
exception of one long theological paper.—M. 1845.]
In a quarter of the city which was inhabited only by mechanics
and Jews, the marriage of an innkeeper and a washer woman
produced the future deliverer of Rome. 20 201 From such parents
Nicholas Rienzi Gabrini could inherit neither dignity nor
fortune; and the gift of a liberal education, which they
painfully bestowed, was the cause of his glory and untimely end.
The study of history and eloquence, the writings of Cicero,
Seneca, Livy, Cæsar, and Valerius Maximus, elevated above his
equals and contemporaries the genius of the young plebeian: he
perused with indefatigable diligence the manuscripts and marbles
of antiquity; loved to dispense his knowledge in familiar
language; and was often provoked to exclaim, “Where are now these
Romans? their virtue, their justice, their power? why was I not
born in those happy times?” 21 When the republic addressed to the
throne of Avignon an embassy of the three orders, the spirit and
eloquence of Rienzi recommended him to a place among the thirteen
deputies of the commons. The orator had the honor of haranguing
Pope Clement the Sixth, and the satisfaction of conversing with
Petrarch, a congenial mind: but his aspiring hopes were chilled
by disgrace and poverty and the patriot was reduced to a single
garment and the charity of the hospital. 211 From this misery he
was relieved by the sense of merit or the smile of favor; and the
employment of apostolic notary afforded him a daily stipend of
five gold florins, a more honorable and extensive connection, and
the right of contrasting, both in words and actions, his own
integrity with the vices of the state. The eloquence of Rienzi
was prompt and persuasive: the multitude is always prone to envy
and censure: he was stimulated by the loss of a brother and the
impunity of the assassins; nor was it possible to excuse or
exaggerate the public calamities. The blessings of peace and
justice, for which civil society has been instituted, were
banished from Rome: the jealous citizens, who might have endured
every personal or pecuniary injury, were most deeply wounded in
the dishonor of their wives and daughters: 22 they were equally
oppressed by the arrogance of the nobles and the corruption of
the magistrates; 221 and the abuse of arms or of laws was the
only circumstance that distinguished the lions from the dogs and
serpents of the Capitol. These allegorical emblems were variously
repeated in the pictures which Rienzi exhibited in the streets
and churches; and while the spectators gazed with curious wonder,
the bold and ready orator unfolded the meaning, applied the
satire, inflamed their passions, and announced a distant hope of
comfort and deliverance. The privileges of Rome, her eternal
sovereignty over her princes and provinces, was the theme of his
public and private discourse; and a monument of servitude became
in his hands a title and incentive of liberty. The decree of the
senate, which granted the most ample prerogatives to the emperor
Vespasian, had been inscribed on a copper plate still extant in
the choir of the church of St. John Lateran. 23 A numerous
assembly of nobles and plebeians was invited to this political
lecture, and a convenient theatre was erected for their
reception. The notary appeared in a magnificent and mysterious
habit, explained the inscription by a version and commentary, 24
and descanted with eloquence and zeal on the ancient glories of
the senate and people, from whom all legal authority was derived.
The supine ignorance of the nobles was incapable of discerning
the serious tendency of such representations: they might
sometimes chastise with words and blows the plebeian reformer;
but he was often suffered in the Colonna palace to amuse the
company with his threats and predictions; and the modern Brutus
25 was concealed under the mask of folly and the character of a
buffoon. While they indulged their contempt, the restoration of
the _good estate_, his favorite expression, was entertained among
the people as a desirable, a possible, and at length as an
approaching, event; and while all had the disposition to applaud,
some had the courage to assist, their promised deliverer.
20 (return) [ The first and splendid period of Rienzi, his
tribunitian government, is contained in the xviiith chapter of
the Fragments, (p. 399—479,) which, in the new division, forms
the iid book of the history in xxxviii. smaller chapters or
sections.]
201 (return) [ But see in Dr. Papencordt’s work, and in Rienzi’s
own words, his claim to be a bastard son of the emperor Henry the
Seventh, whose intrigue with his mother Rienzi relates with a
sort of proud shamelessness. Compare account by the editor of Dr.
Papencordt’s work in Quarterly Review vol. lxix.—M. 1845.]
21 (return) [ The reader may be pleased with a specimen of the
original idiom: Fò da soa juventutine nutricato di latte de
eloquentia, bono gramatico, megliore rettuorico, autorista bravo.
Deh como et quanto era veloce leitore! moito usava Tito Livio,
Seneca, et Tullio, et Balerio Massimo, moito li dilettava le
magnificentie di Julio Cesare raccontare. Tutta la die se
speculava negl’ intagli di marmo lequali iaccio intorno Roma. Non
era altri che esso, che sapesse lejere li antichi pataffii. Tutte
scritture antiche vulgarizzava; quesse fiure di marmo justamente
interpretava. On come spesso diceva, “Dove suono quelli buoni
Romani? dove ene loro somma justitia? poleramme trovare in tempo
che quessi fiuriano!”]
211 (return) [ Sir J. Hobhouse published (in his Illustrations of
Childe Harold) Rienzi’s joyful letter to the people of Rome on
the apparently favorable termination of this mission.—M. 1845.]
22 (return) [ Petrarch compares the jealousy of the Romans with
the easy temper of the husbands of Avignon, (Mémoires, tom. i. p.
330.)]
221 (return) [ All this Rienzi, writing at a later period to the
archbishop of Prague, attributed to the criminal abandonment of
his flock by the supreme pontiff. See Urkunde apud Papencordt, p.
xliv. Quarterly Review, p. 255.—M. 1845.]
23 (return) [ The fragments of the _Lex regia_ may be found in
the Inscriptions of Gruter, tom. i. p. 242, and at the end of the
Tacitus of Ernesti, with some learned notes of the editor, tom.
ii.]
24 (return) [ I cannot overlook a stupendous and laughable
blunder of Rienzi. The Lex regia empowers Vespasian to enlarge
the Pomrium, a word familiar to every antiquary. It was not so to
the tribune; he confounds it with pom_a_rium, an orchard,
translates lo Jardino de Roma cioene Italia, and is copied by the
less excusable ignorance of the Latin translator (p. 406) and the
French historian, (p. 33.) Even the learning of Muratori has
slumbered over the passage.]
25 (return) [ Priori (_Bruto_) tamen similior, juvenis uterque,
longe ingenio quam cujus simulationem induerat, ut sub hoc
obtentû liberator ille P R. aperiretur tempore suo.... Ille
regibus, hic tyrannis contemptus, (Opp. p. 536.) * Note: Fatcor
attamen quod-nunc fatuum. nunc hystrionem, nunc gravem nunc
simplicem, nunc astutum, nunc fervidum, nunc timidum simulatorem,
et dissimulatorem ad hunc caritativum finem, quem dixi,
constitusepius memet ipsum. Writing to an archbishop, (of
Prague,) Rienzi alleges scriptural examples. Saltator coram archa
David et insanus apparuit coram Rege; blanda, astuta, et tecta
Judith astitit Holoferni; et astute Jacob meruit benedici,
Urkunde xlix.—M. 1845.]
A prophecy, or rather a summons, affixed on the church door of
St. George, was the first public evidence of his designs; a
nocturnal assembly of a hundred citizens on Mount Aventine, the
first step to their execution. After an oath of secrecy and aid,
he represented to the conspirators the importance and facility of
their enterprise; that the nobles, without union or resources,
were strong only in the fear nobles, of their imaginary strength;
that all power, as well as right, was in the hands of the people;
that the revenues of the apostolical chamber might relieve the
public distress; and that the pope himself would approve their
victory over the common enemies of government and freedom. After
securing a faithful band to protect his first declaration, he
proclaimed through the city, by sound of trumpet, that on the
evening of the following day, all persons should assemble without
arms before the church of St. Angelo, to provide for the
reestablishment of the good estate. The whole night was employed
in the celebration of thirty masses of the Holy Ghost; and in the
morning, Rienzi, bareheaded, but in complete armor, issued from
the church, encompassed by the hundred conspirators. The pope’s
vicar, the simple bishop of Orvieto, who had been persuaded to
sustain a part in this singular ceremony, marched on his right
hand; and three great standards were borne aloft as the emblems
of their design. In the first, the banner of _liberty_, Rome was
seated on two lions, with a palm in one hand and a globe in the
other; St. Paul, with a drawn sword, was delineated in the banner
of _justice_; and in the third, St. Peter held the keys of
_concord_ and _peace_. Rienzi was encouraged by the presence and
applause of an innumerable crowd, who understood little, and
hoped much; and the procession slowly rolled forwards from the
castle of St. Angelo to the Capitol. His triumph was disturbed by
some secret emotions which he labored to suppress: he ascended
without opposition, and with seeming confidence, the citadel of
the republic; harangued the people from the balcony; and received
the most flattering confirmation of his acts and laws. The
nobles, as if destitute of arms and counsels, beheld in silent
consternation this strange revolution; and the moment had been
prudently chosen, when the most formidable, Stephen Colonna, was
absent from the city. On the first rumor, he returned to his
palace, affected to despise this plebeian tumult, and declared to
the messenger of Rienzi, that at his leisure he would cast the
madman from the windows of the Capitol. The great bell instantly
rang an alarm, and so rapid was the tide, so urgent was the
danger, that Colonna escaped with precipitation to the suburb of
St. Laurence: from thence, after a moment’s refreshment, he
continued the same speedy career till he reached in safety his
castle of Palestrina; lamenting his own imprudence, which had not
trampled the spark of this mighty conflagration. A general and
peremptory order was issued from the Capitol to all the nobles,
that they should peaceably retire to their estates: they obeyed;
and their departure secured the tranquillity of the free and
obedient citizens of Rome.
But such voluntary obedience evaporates with the first transports
of zeal; and Rienzi felt the importance of justifying his
usurpation by a regular form and a legal title. At his own
choice, the Roman people would have displayed their attachment
and authority, by lavishing on his head the names of senator or
consul, of king or emperor: he preferred the ancient and modest
appellation of tribune; 251 the protection of the commons was the
essence of that sacred office; and they were ignorant, that it
had never been invested with any share in the legislative or
executive powers of the republic. In this character, and with the
consent of the Roman, the tribune enacted the most salutary laws
for the restoration and maintenance of the good estate. By the
first he fulfils the wish of honesty and inexperience, that no
civil suit should be protracted beyond the term of fifteen days.
The danger of frequent perjury might justify the pronouncing
against a false accuser the same penalty which his evidence would
have inflicted: the disorders of the times might compel the
legislator to punish every homicide with death, and every injury
with equal retaliation. But the execution of justice was hopeless
till he had previously abolished the tyranny of the nobles. It
was formally provided, that none, except the supreme magistrate,
should possess or command the gates, bridges, or towers of the
state; that no private garrisons should be introduced into the
towns or castles of the Roman territory; that none should bear
arms, or presume to fortify their houses in the city or country;
that the barons should be responsible for the safety of the
highways, and the free passage of provisions; and that the
protection of malefactors and robbers should be expiated by a
fine of a thousand marks of silver. But these regulations would
have been impotent and nugatory, had not the licentious nobles
been awed by the sword of the civil power. A sudden alarm from
the bell of the Capitol could still summon to the standard above
twenty thousand volunteers: the support of the tribune and the
laws required a more regular and permanent force. In each harbor
of the coast a vessel was stationed for the assurance of
commerce; a standing militia of three hundred and sixty horse and
thirteen hundred foot was levied, clothed, and paid in the
thirteen quarters of the city: and the spirit of a commonwealth
may be traced in the grateful allowance of one hundred florins,
or pounds, to the heirs of every soldier who lost his life in the
service of his country. For the maintenance of the public
defence, for the establishment of granaries, for the relief of
widows, orphans, and indigent convents, Rienzi applied, without
fear of sacrilege, the revenues of the apostolic chamber: the
three branches of hearth-money, the salt-duty, and the customs,
were each of the annual produce of one hundred thousand florins;
26 and scandalous were the abuses, if in four or five months the
amount of the salt-duty could be trebled by his judicious
economy. After thus restoring the forces and finances of the
republic, the tribune recalled the nobles from their solitary
independence; required their personal appearance in the Capitol;
and imposed an oath of allegiance to the new government, and of
submission to the laws of the good estate. Apprehensive for their
safety, but still more apprehensive of the danger of a refusal,
the princes and barons returned to their houses at Rome in the
garb of simple and peaceful citizens: the Colonna and Ursini, the
Savelli and Frangipani, were confounded before the tribunal of a
plebeian, of the vile buffoon whom they had so often derided, and
their disgrace was aggravated by the indignation which they
vainly struggled to disguise. The same oath was successively
pronounced by the several orders of society, the clergy and
gentlemen, the judges and notaries, the merchants and artisans,
and the gradual descent was marked by the increase of sincerity
and zeal. They swore to live and die with the republic and the
church, whose interest was artfully united by the nominal
association of the bishop of Orvieto, the pope’s vicar, to the
office of tribune. It was the boast of Rienzi, that he had
delivered the throne and patrimony of St. Peter from a rebellious
aristocracy; and Clement the Sixth, who rejoiced in its fall,
affected to believe the professions, to applaud the merits, and
to confirm the title, of his trusty servant. The speech, perhaps
the mind, of the tribune, was inspired with a lively regard for
the purity of the faith: he insinuated his claim to a
supernatural mission from the Holy Ghost; enforced by a heavy
forfeiture the annual duty of confession and communion; and
strictly guarded the spiritual as well as temporal welfare of his
faithful people. 27
251 (return) [ Et ego, Deo semper auctore, ipsa die pristinâ
(leg. primâ) Tribunatus, quæ quidem dignitas a tempore deflorati
Imperii, et per annos Vo et ultra sub tyrannicà occupatione
vacavit, ipsos omnes potentes indifferenter Deum at justitiam
odientes, a meâ, ymo a Dei facie fugiendo vehementi Spiritu
dissipavi, et nullo effuso cruore trementes expuli, sine ictu
remanente Romane terre facie renovatâ. Libellus Tribuni ad
Cæsarem, p. xxxiv.—M. 1845.]
26 (return) [ In one MS. I read (l. ii. c. 4, p. 409) perfumante
quatro _solli_, in another, quatro _florini_, an important
variety, since the florin was worth ten Roman _solidi_,
(Muratori, dissert. xxviii.) The former reading would give us a
population of 25,000, the latter of 250,000 families; and I much
fear, that the former is more consistent with the decay of Rome
and her territory.]
27 (return) [ Hocsemius, p. 498, apud du Cerçeau, Hist. de
Rienzi, p. 194. The fifteen tribunitian laws may be found in the
Roman historian (whom for brevity I shall name) Fortifiocca, l.
ii. c. 4.]
Chapter LXX: Final Settlement Of The Ecclesiastical State.—Part
II.
Never perhaps has the energy and effect of a single mind been
more remarkably felt than in the sudden, though transient,
reformation of Rome by the tribune Rienzi. A den of robbers was
converted to the discipline of a camp or convent: patient to
hear, swift to redress, inexorable to punish, his tribunal was
always accessible to the poor and stranger; nor could birth, or
dignity, or the immunities of the church, protect the offender or
his accomplices. The privileged houses, the private sanctuaries
in Rome, on which no officer of justice would presume to
trespass, were abolished; and he applied the timber and iron of
their barricades in the fortifications of the Capitol. The
venerable father of the Colonna was exposed in his own palace to
the double shame of being desirous, and of being unable, to
protect a criminal. A mule, with a jar of oil, had been stolen
near Capranica; and the lord of the Ursini family was condemned
to restore the damage, and to discharge a fine of four hundred
florins for his negligence in guarding the highways. Nor were the
persons of the barons more inviolate than their lands or houses;
and, either from accident or design, the same impartial rigor was
exercised against the heads of the adverse factions. Peter Agapet
Colonna, who had himself been senator of Rome, was arrested in
the street for injury or debt; and justice was appeased by the
tardy execution of Martin Ursini, who, among his various acts of
violence and rapine, had pillaged a shipwrecked vessel at the
mouth of the Tyber. 28 His name, the purple of two cardinals, his
uncles, a recent marriage, and a mortal disease were disregarded
by the inflexible tribune, who had chosen his victim. The public
officers dragged him from his palace and nuptial bed: his trial
was short and satisfactory: the bell of the Capitol convened the
people: stripped of his mantle, on his knees, with his hands
bound behind his back, he heard the sentence of death; and after
a brief confession, Ursini was led away to the gallows. After
such an example, none who were conscious of guilt could hope for
impunity, and the flight of the wicked, the licentious, and the
idle, soon purified the city and territory of Rome. In this time
(says the historian,) the woods began to rejoice that they were
no longer infested with robbers; the oxen began to plough; the
pilgrims visited the sanctuaries; the roads and inns were
replenished with travellers; trade, plenty, and good faith, were
restored in the markets; and a purse of gold might be exposed
without danger in the midst of the highway. As soon as the life
and property of the subject are secure, the labors and rewards of
industry spontaneously revive: Rome was still the metropolis of
the Christian world; and the fame and fortunes of the tribune
were diffused in every country by the strangers who had enjoyed
the blessings of his government.
28 (return) [ Fortifiocca, l. ii. c. 11. From the account of this
shipwreck, we learn some circumstances of the trade and
navigation of the age. 1. The ship was built and freighted at
Naples for the ports of Marseilles and Avignon. 2. The sailors
were of Naples and the Isle of naria less skilful than those of
Sicily and Genoa. 3. The navigation from Marseilles was a
coasting voyage to the mouth of the Tyber, where they took
shelter in a storm; but, instead of finding the current,
unfortunately ran on a shoal: the vessel was stranded, the
mariners escaped. 4. The cargo, which was pillaged, consisted of
the revenue of Provence for the royal treasury, many bags of
pepper and cinnamon, and bales of French cloth, to the value of
20,000 florins; a rich prize.]