Persia, the fourth in descent from Zingis. From these traditions,
his vizier Fadlallah composed a Mogul history in the Persian
language, which has been used by Petit de la Croix, (Hist. de
Genghizcan, p. 537—539.) The Histoire Généalogique des Tatars (à
Leyde, 1726, in 12mo., 2 tomes) was translated by the Swedish
prisoners in Siberia from the Mogul MS. of Abulgasi Bahadur Khan,
a descendant of Zingis, who reigned over the Usbeks of Charasm,
or Carizme, (A.D. 1644—1663.) He is of most value and credit for
the names, pedigrees, and manners of his nation. Of his nine
parts, the ist descends from Adam to Mogul Khan; the iid, from
Mogul to Zingis; the iiid is the life of Zingis; the ivth, vth,
vith, and viith, the general history of his four sons and their
posterity; the viiith and ixth, the particular history of the
descendants of Sheibani Khan, who reigned in Maurenahar and
Charasm.]
8 (return) [ Histoire de Gentchiscan, et de toute la Dinastie des
Mongous ses Successeurs, Conquerans de la Chine; tirée de
l’Histoire de la Chine par le R. P. Gaubil, de la Société de
Jesus, Missionaire à Peking; à Paris, 1739, in 4to. This
translation is stamped with the Chinese character of domestic
accuracy and foreign ignorance.]
9 (return) [ See the Histoire du Grand Genghizcan, premier
Empereur des Moguls et Tartares, par M. Petit de la Croix, à
Paris, 1710, in 12mo.; a work of ten years’ labor, chiefly drawn
from the Persian writers, among whom Nisavi, the secretary of
Sultan Gelaleddin, has the merit and prejudices of a
contemporary. A slight air of romance is the fault of the
originals, or the compiler. See likewise the articles of
_Genghizcan_, _Mohammed_, _Gelaleddin_, &c., in the Bibliothèque
Orientale of D’Herbelot. * Note: The preface to the Hist. des
Mongols, (Paris, 1824) gives a catalogue of the Arabic and
Persian authorities.—M.]
10 (return) [ Haithonus, or Aithonus, an Armenian prince, and
afterwards a monk of Premontré, (Fabric, Bibliot. Lat. Medii Ævi,
tom. i. p. 34,) dictated in the French language, his book _de
Tartaris_, his old fellow-soldiers. It was immediately translated
into Latin, and is inserted in the Novus Orbis of Simon Grynæus,
(Basil, 1555, in folio.) * Note: A précis at the end of the new
edition of Le Beau, Hist. des Empereurs, vol. xvii., by M.
Brosset, gives large extracts from the accounts of the Armenian
historians relating to the Mogul conquests.—M.]
11 (return) [ Zingis Khan, and his first successors, occupy the
conclusion of the ixth Dynasty of Abulpharagius, (vers. Pocock,
Oxon. 1663, in 4to.;) and his xth Dynasty is that of the Moguls
of Persia. Assemannus (Bibliot. Orient. tom. ii.) has extracted
some facts from his Syriac writings, and the lives of the
Jacobite maphrians, or primates of the East.]
12 (return) [ Among the Arabians, in language and religion, we
may distinguish Abulfeda, sultan of Hamah in Syria, who fought in
person, under the Mamaluke standard, against the Moguls.]
13 (return) [ Nicephorus Gregoras (l. ii. c. 5, 6) has felt the
necessity of connecting the Scythian and Byzantine histories. He
describes with truth and elegance the settlement and manners of
the Moguls of Persia, but he is ignorant of their origin, and
corrupts the names of Zingis and his sons.]
14 (return) [ M. Levesque (Histoire de Russie, tom. ii.) has
described the conquest of Russia by the Tartars, from the
patriarch Nicon, and the old chronicles.]
15 (return) [ For Poland, I am content with the Sarmatia Asiatica
et Europæa of Matthew à Michou, or De Michoviâ, a canon and
physician of Cracow, (A.D. 1506,) inserted in the Novus Orbis of
Grynæus. Fabric Bibliot. Latin. Mediæ et Infimæ Ætatis, tom. v.
p. 56.]
16 (return) [ I should quote Thuroczius, the oldest general
historian (pars ii. c. 74, p. 150) in the 1st volume of the
Scriptores Rerum Hungaricarum, did not the same volume contain
the original narrative of a contemporary, an eye-witness, and a
sufferer, (M. Rogerii, Hungari, Varadiensis Capituli Canonici,
Carmen miserabile, seu Historia super Destructione Regni Hungariæ
Temporibus Belæ IV. Regis per Tartaros facta, p. 292—321;) the
best picture that I have ever seen of all the circumstances of a
Barbaric invasion.]
17 (return) [ Matthew Paris has represented, from authentic
documents, the danger and distress of Europe, (consult the word
_Tartari_ in his copious Index.) From motives of zeal and
curiosity, the court of the great khan in the xiiith century was
visited by two friars, John de Plano Carpini, and William
Rubruquis, and by Marco Polo, a Venetian gentleman. The Latin
relations of the two former are inserted in the 1st volume of
Hackluyt; the Italian original or version of the third (Fabric.
Bibliot. Latin. Medii Ævi, tom. ii. p. 198, tom. v. p. 25) may be
found in the second tome of Ramusio.]
18 (return) [ In his great History of the Huns, M. de Guignes has
most amply treated of Zingis Khan and his successors. See tom.
iii. l. xv.—xix., and in the collateral articles of the
Seljukians of Roum, tom. ii. l. xi., the Carizmians, l. xiv., and
the Mamalukes, tom. iv. l. xxi.; consult likewise the tables of
the 1st volume. He is ever learned and accurate; yet I am only
indebted to him for a general view, and some passages of
Abulfeda, which are still latent in the Arabic text. * Note: To
this catalogue of the historians of the Moguls may be added
D’Ohson, Histoire des Mongols; Histoire des Mongols, (from Arabic
and Persian authorities,) Paris, 1824. Schmidt, Geschichte der
Ost Mongolen, St. Petersburgh, 1829. This curious work, by
Ssanang Ssetsen Chungtaidschi, published in the original Mongol,
was written after the conversion of the nation to Buddhism: it is
enriched with very valuable notes by the editor and translator;
but, unfortunately, is very barren of information about the
European and even the western Asiatic conquests of the
Mongols.—M.]
Chapter LXIV: Moguls, Ottoman Turks.—Part II.
The arms of Zingis and his lieutenants successively reduced the
hordes of the desert, who pitched their tents between the wall of
China and the Volga; and the Mogul emperor became the monarch of
the pastoral world, the lord of many millions of shepherds and
soldiers, who felt their united strength, and were impatient to
rush on the mild and wealthy climates of the south. His ancestors
had been the tributaries of the Chinese emperors; and Temugin
himself had been disgraced by a title of honor and servitude. The
court of Pekin was astonished by an embassy from its former
vassal, who, in the tone of the king of nations, exacted the
tribute and obedience which he had paid, and who affected to
treat the _son of heaven_ as the most contemptible of mankind. A
haughty answer disguised their secret apprehensions; and their
fears were soon justified by the march of innumerable squadrons,
who pierced on all sides the feeble rampart of the great wall.
Ninety cities were stormed, or starved, by the Moguls; ten only
escaped; and Zingis, from a knowledge of the filial piety of the
Chinese, covered his vanguard with their captive parents; an
unworthy, and by degrees a fruitless, abuse of the virtue of his
enemies. His invasion was supported by the revolt of a hundred
thousand Khitans, who guarded the frontier: yet he listened to a
treaty; and a princess of China, three thousand horses, five
hundred youths, and as many virgins, and a tribute of gold and
silk, were the price of his retreat. In his second expedition, he
compelled the Chinese emperor to retire beyond the yellow river
to a more southern residence. The siege of Pekin 19 was long and
laborious: the inhabitants were reduced by famine to decimate and
devour their fellow-citizens; when their ammunition was spent,
they discharged ingots of gold and silver from their engines; but
the Moguls introduced a mine to the centre of the capital; and
the conflagration of the palace burnt above thirty days. China
was desolated by Tartar war and domestic faction; and the five
northern provinces were added to the empire of Zingis.
19 (return) [ More properly _Yen-king_, an ancient city, whose
ruins still appear some furlongs to the south-east of the modern
_Pekin_, which was built by Cublai Khan, (Gaubel, p. 146.)
Pe-king and Nan-king are vague titles, the courts of the north
and of the south. The identity and change of names perplex the
most skilful readers of the Chinese geography, (p. 177.) * Note:
And likewise in Chinese history—see Abel Remusat, Mel. Asiat. 2d
tom. ii. p. 5.—M.]
In the West, he touched the dominions of Mohammed, sultan of
Carizme, who reigned from the Persian Gulf to the borders of
India and Turkestan; and who, in the proud imitation of Alexander
the Great, forgot the servitude and ingratitude of his fathers to
the house of Seljuk. It was the wish of Zingis to establish a
friendly and commercial intercourse with the most powerful of the
Moslem princes: nor could he be tempted by the secret
solicitations of the caliph of Bagdad, who sacrificed to his
personal wrongs the safety of the church and state. A rash and
inhuman deed provoked and justified the Tartar arms in the
invasion of the southern Asia. 191 A caravan of three ambassadors
and one hundred and fifty merchants were arrested and murdered at
Otrar, by the command of Mohammed; nor was it till after a demand
and denial of justice, till he had prayed and fasted three nights
on a mountain, that the Mogul emperor appealed to the judgment of
God and his sword. Our European battles, says a philosophic
writer, 20 are petty skirmishes, if compared to the numbers that
have fought and fallen in the fields of Asia. Seven hundred
thousand Moguls and Tartars are said to have marched under the
standard of Zingis and his four sons. In the vast plains that
extend to the north of the Sihon or Jaxartes, they were
encountered by four hundred thousand soldiers of the sultan; and
in the first battle, which was suspended by the night, one
hundred and sixty thousand Carizmians were slain. Mohammed was
astonished by the multitude and valor of his enemies: he withdrew
from the scene of danger, and distributed his troops in the
frontier towns; trusting that the Barbarians, invincible in the
field, would be repulsed by the length and difficulty of so many
regular sieges. But the prudence of Zingis had formed a body of
Chinese engineers, skilled in the mechanic arts; informed perhaps
of the secret of gunpowder, and capable, under his discipline, of
attacking a foreign country with more vigor and success than they
had defended their own. The Persian historians will relate the
sieges and reduction of Otrar, Cogende, Bochara, Samarcand,
Carizme, Herat, Merou, Nisabour, Balch, and Candahar; and the
conquest of the rich and populous countries of Transoxiana,
Carizme, and Chorazan. 204 The destructive hostilities of Attila
and the Huns have long since been elucidated by the example of
Zingis and the Moguls; and in this more proper place I shall be
content to observe, that, from the Caspian to the Indus, they
ruined a tract of many hundred miles, which was adorned with the
habitations and labors of mankind, and that five centuries have
not been sufficient to repair the ravages of four years. The
Mogul emperor encouraged or indulged the fury of his troops: the
hope of future possession was lost in the ardor of rapine and
slaughter; and the cause of the war exasperated their native
fierceness by the pretence of justice and revenge. The downfall
and death of the sultan Mohammed, who expired, unpitied and
alone, in a desert island of the Caspian Sea, is a poor atonement
for the calamities of which he was the author. Could the
Carizmian empire have been saved by a single hero, it would have
been saved by his son Gelaleddin, whose active valor repeatedly
checked the Moguls in the career of victory. Retreating, as he
fought, to the banks of the Indus, he was oppressed by their
innumerable host, till, in the last moment of despair, Gelaleddin
spurred his horse into the waves, swam one of the broadest and
most rapid rivers of Asia, and extorted the admiration and
applause of Zingis himself. It was in this camp that the Mogul
conqueror yielded with reluctance to the murmurs of his weary and
wealthy troops, who sighed for the enjoyment of their native
land. Eucumbered with the spoils of Asia, he slowly measured back
his footsteps, betrayed some pity for the misery of the
vanquished, and declared his intention of rebuilding the cities
which had been swept away by the tempest of his arms. After he
had repassed the Oxus and Jaxartes, he was joined by two
generals, whom he had detached with thirty thousand horse, to
subdue the western provinces of Persia. They had trampled on the
nations which opposed their passage, penetrated through the gates
of Derbent, traversed the Volga and the desert, and accomplished
the circuit of the Caspian Sea, by an expedition which had never
been attempted, and has never been repeated. The return of Zingis
was signalized by the overthrow of the rebellious or independent
kingdoms of Tartary; and he died in the fulness of years and
glory, with his last breath exhorting and instructing his sons to
achieve the conquest of the Chinese empire. 205
191 (return) [ See the particular account of this transaction,
from the Kholauesut el Akbaur, in Price, vol. ii. p. 402.—M.]
20 (return) [ M. de Voltaire, Essai sur l’Histoire Générale, tom.
iii. c. 60, p. 8. His account of Zingis and the Moguls contains,
as usual, much general sense and truth, with some particular
errors.]
204 (return) [ Every where they massacred all classes, except the
artisans, whom they made slaves. Hist. des Mongols.—M.]
205 (return) [ Their first duty, which he bequeathed to them, was
to massacre the king of Tangcoute and all the inhabitants of
Ninhia, the surrender of the city being already agreed upon,
Hist. des Mongols. vol. i. p. 286.—M.]
The harem of Zingis was composed of five hundred wives and
concubines; and of his numerous progeny, four sons, illustrious
by their birth and merit, exercised under their father the
principal offices of peace and war. Toushi was his great
huntsman, Zagatai 21 his judge, Octai his minister, and Tuli his
general; and their names and actions are often conspicuous in the
history of his conquests. Firmly united for their own and the
public interest, the three brothers and their families were
content with dependent sceptres; and Octai, by general consent,
was proclaimed great khan, or emperor of the Moguls and Tartars.
He was succeeded by his son Gayuk, after whose death the empire
devolved to his cousins Mangou and Cublai, the sons of Tuli, and
the grandsons of Zingis. In the sixty-eight years of his four
first successors, the Mogul subdued almost all Asia, and a large
portion of Europe. Without confining myself to the order of time,
without expatiating on the detail of events, I shall present a
general picture of the progress of their arms; I. In the East;
II. In the South; III. In the West; and IV. In the North.
21 (return) [ Zagatai gave his name to his dominions of
Maurenahar, or Transoxiana; and the Moguls of Hindostan, who
emigrated from that country, are styled Zagatais by the Persians.
This certain etymology, and the similar example of Uzbek, Nogai,
&c., may warn us not absolutely to reject the derivations of a
national, from a personal, name. * Note: See a curious anecdote
of Tschagatai. Hist. des Mongols, p. 370.—M.]
I. Before the invasion of Zingis, China was divided into two
empires or dynasties of the North and South; 22 and the
difference of origin and interest was smoothed by a general
conformity of laws, language, and national manners. The Northern
empire, which had been dismembered by Zingis, was finally subdued
seven years after his death. After the loss of Pekin, the emperor
had fixed his residence at Kaifong, a city many leagues in
circumference, and which contained, according to the Chinese
annals, fourteen hundred thousand families of inhabitants and
fugitives. He escaped from thence with only seven horsemen, and
made his last stand in a third capital, till at length the
hopeless monarch, protesting his innocence and accusing his
fortune, ascended a funeral pile, and gave orders, that, as soon
as he had stabbed himself, the fire should be kindled by his
attendants. The dynasty of the _Song_, the native and ancient
sovereigns of the whole empire, survived about forty-five years
the fall of the Northern usurpers; and the perfect conquest was
reserved for the arms of Cublai. During this interval, the Moguls
were often diverted by foreign wars; and, if the Chinese seldom
dared to meet their victors in the field, their passive courage
presented and endless succession of cities to storm and of
millions to slaughter. In the attack and defence of places, the
engines of antiquity and the Greek fire were alternately
employed: the use of gunpowder in cannon and bombs appears as a
familiar practice; 23 and the sieges were conducted by the
Mahometans and Franks, who had been liberally invited into the
service of Cublai. After passing the great river, the troops and
artillery were conveyed along a series of canals, till they
invested the royal residence of Hamcheu, or Quinsay, in the
country of silk, the most delicious climate of China. The
emperor, a defenceless youth, surrendered his person and sceptre;
and before he was sent in exile into Tartary, he struck nine
times the ground with his forehead, to adore in prayer or
thanksgiving the mercy of the great khan. Yet the war (it was now
styled a rebellion) was still maintained in the southern
provinces from Hamcheu to Canton; and the obstinate remnant of
independence and hostility was transported from the land to the
sea. But when the fleet of the _Song_ was surrounded and
oppressed by a superior armament, their last champion leaped into
the waves with his infant emperor in his arms. “It is more
glorious,” he cried, “to die a prince, than to live a slave.” A
hundred thousand Chinese imitated his example; and the whole
empire, from Tonkin to the great wall, submitted to the dominion
of Cublai. His boundless ambition aspired to the conquest of
Japan: his fleet was twice shipwrecked; and the lives of a
hundred thousand Moguls and Chinese were sacrificed in the
fruitless expedition. But the circumjacent kingdoms, Corea,
Tonkin, Cochinchina, Pegu, Bengal, and Thibet, were reduced in
different degrees of tribute and obedience by the effort or
terror of his arms. He explored the Indian Ocean with a fleet of
a thousand ships: they sailed in sixty-eight days, most probably
to the Isle of Borneo, under the equinoctial line; and though
they returned not without spoil or glory, the emperor was
dissatisfied that the savage king had escaped from their hands.
22 (return) [ In Marco Polo, and the Oriental geographers, the
names of Cathay and Mangi distinguish the northern and southern
empires, which, from A.D. 1234 to 1279, were those of the great
khan, and of the Chinese. The search of Cathay, after China had
been found, excited and misled our navigators of the sixteenth
century, in their attempts to discover the north-east passage.]
23 (return) [ I depend on the knowledge and fidelity of the Père
Gaubil, who translates the Chinese text of the annals of the
Moguls or Yuen, (p. 71, 93, 153;) but I am ignorant at what time
these annals were composed and published. The two uncles of Marco
Polo, who served as engineers at the siege of Siengyangfou, * (l.
ii. 61, in Ramusio, tom. ii. See Gaubil, p. 155, 157) must have
felt and related the effects of this destructive powder, and
their silence is a weighty, and almost decisive objection. I
entertain a suspicion, that their recent discovery was carried
from Europe to China by the caravans of the xvth century and
falsely adopted as an old national discovery before the arrival
of the Portuguese and Jesuits in the xvith. Yet the Père Gaubil
affirms, that the use of gunpowder has been known to the Chinese
above 1600 years. ** Note: * Sou-houng-kian-lou. Abel Remusat.—M.
Note: ** La poudre à canon et d’autres compositions inflammantes,
dont ils se servent pour construire des pièces d’artifice d’un
effet suprenant, leur étaient connues depuis très long-temps, et
l’on croit que des bombardes et des pierriers, dont ils avaient
enseigné l’usage aux Tartares, ont pu donner en Europe l’idée
d’artillerie, quoique la forme des fusils et des canons dont ils
se servent actuellement, leur ait été apportée par les Francs,
ainsi que l’attestent les noms mêmes qu’ils donnent à ces sortes
d’armes. Abel Remusat, Mélanges Asiat. 2d ser. tom. i. p. 23.—M.]
II. The conquest of Hindostan by the Moguls was reserved in a
later period for the house of Timour; but that of Iran, or
Persia, was achieved by Holagou Khan, 231 the grandson of Zingis,
the brother and lieutenant of the two successive emperors, Mangou
and Cublai. I shall not enumerate the crowd of sultans, emirs,
and atabeks, whom he trampled into dust; but the extirpation of
the _Assassins_, or Ismaelians 24 of Persia, may be considered as
a service to mankind. Among the hills to the south of the
Caspian, these odious sectaries had reigned with impunity above a
hundred and sixty years; and their prince, or Imam, established
his lieutenant to lead and govern the colony of Mount Libanus, so
famous and formidable in the history of the crusades. 25 With the
fanaticism of the Koran the Ismaelians had blended the Indian
transmigration, and the visions of their own prophets; and it was
their first duty to devote their souls and bodies in blind
obedience to the vicar of God. The daggers of his missionaries
were felt both in the East and West: the Christians and the
Moslems enumerate, and persons multiply, the illustrious victims
that were sacrificed to the zeal, avarice, or resentment of _the
old man_ (as he was corruptly styled) _of the mountain_. But
these daggers, his only arms, were broken by the sword of
Holagou, and not a vestige is left of the enemies of mankind,
except the word _assassin_, which, in the most odious sense, has
been adopted in the languages of Europe. The extinction of the
Abbassides cannot be indifferent to the spectators of their
greatness and decline. Since the fall of their Seljukian tyrants
the caliphs had recovered their lawful dominion of Bagdad and the
Arabian Irak; but the city was distracted by theological
factions, and the commander of the faithful was lost in a harem
of seven hundred concubines. The invasion of the Moguls he
encountered with feeble arms and haughty embassies. “On the
divine decree,” said the caliph Mostasem, “is founded the throne
of the sons of Abbas: and their foes shall surely be destroyed in
this world and in the next. Who is this Holagou that dares to
rise against them? If he be desirous of peace, let him instantly
depart from the sacred territory; and perhaps he may obtain from
our clemency the pardon of his fault.” This presumption was
cherished by a perfidious vizier, who assured his master, that,
even if the Barbarians had entered the city, the women and
children, from the terraces, would be sufficient to overwhelm
them with stones. But when Holagou touched the phantom, it
instantly vanished into smoke. After a siege of two months,
Bagdad was stormed and sacked by the Moguls; 251 and their savage
commander pronounced the death of the caliph Mostasem, the last
of the temporal successors of Mahomet; whose noble kinsmen, of
the race of Abbas, had reigned in Asia above five hundred years.
Whatever might be the designs of the conqueror, the holy cities
of Mecca and Medina 26 were protected by the Arabian desert; but
the Moguls spread beyond the Tigris and Euphrates, pillaged
Aleppo and Damascus, and threatened to join the Franks in the
deliverance of Jerusalem. Egypt was lost, had she been defended
only by her feeble offspring; but the Mamalukes had breathed in
their infancy the keenness of a Scythian air: equal in valor,
superior in discipline, they met the Moguls in many a well-fought
field; and drove back the stream of hostility to the eastward of
the Euphrates. 261 But it overflowed with resistless violence the
kingdoms of Armenia 262 and Anatolia, of which the former was
possessed by the Christians, and the latter by the Turks. The
sultans of Iconium opposed some resistance to the Mogul arms,
till Azzadin sought a refuge among the Greeks of Constantinople,
and his feeble successors, the last of the Seljukian dynasty,
were finally extirpated by the khans of Persia. 263
231 (return) [ See the curious account of the expedition of
Holagou, translated from the Chinese, by M. Abel Remusat,
Mélanges Asiat. 2d ser. tom. i. p. 171.—M.]
24 (return) [ All that can be known of the Assassins of Persia
and Syria is poured from the copious, and even profuse, erudition
of M. Falconet, in two _Mémoires_ read before the Academy of
Inscriptions, (tom. xvii. p. 127—170.) * Note: Von Hammer’s
History of the Assassins has now thrown Falconet’s Dissertation
into the shade.—M.]
25 (return) [ The Ismaelians of Syria, 40,000 Assassins, had
acquired or founded ten castles in the hills above Tortosa. About
the year 1280, they were extirpated by the Mamalukes.]
251 (return) [ Compare Von Hammer, Geschichte der Assassinen, p.
283, 307. Wilken, Geschichte der Kreuzzüge, vol. vii. p. 406.
Price, Chronological Retrospect, vol. ii. p. 217—223.—M.]
26 (return) [ As a proof of the ignorance of the Chinese in
foreign transactions, I must observe, that some of their
historians extend the conquest of Zingis himself to Medina, the
country of Mahomet, (Gaubil p. 42.)]
261 (return) [ Compare Wilken, vol. vii. p. 410.—M.]
262 (return) [ On the friendly relations of the Armenians with
the Mongols see Wilken, Geschichte der Kreuzzüge, vol. vii. p.
402. They eagerly desired an alliance against the Mahometan
powers.—M.]
263 (return) [ Trebizond escaped, apparently by the dexterous
politics of the sovereign, but it acknowledged the Mogul
supremacy. Falmerayer, p. 172.—M.]
III. No sooner had Octai subverted the northern empire of China,
than he resolved to visit with his arms the most remote countries
of the West. Fifteen hundred thousand Moguls and Tartars were
inscribed on the military roll: of these the great khan selected
a third, which he intrusted to the command of his nephew Batou,
the son of Tuli; who reigned over his father’s conquests to the
north of the Caspian Sea. 264 After a festival of forty days,
Batou set forwards on this great expedition; and such was the
speed and ardor of his innumerable squadrons, than in less than
six years they had measured a line of ninety degrees of
longitude, a fourth part of the circumference of the globe. The
great rivers of Asia and Europe, the Volga and Kama, the Don and
Borysthenes, the Vistula and Danube, they either swam with their
horses or passed on the ice, or traversed in leathern boats,
which followed the camp, and transported their wagons and
artillery. By the first victories of Batou, the remains of
national freedom were eradicated in the immense plains of
Turkestan and Kipzak. 27 In his rapid progress, he overran the
kingdoms, as they are now styled, of Astracan and Cazan; and the
troops which he detached towards Mount Caucasus explored the most
secret recesses of Georgia and Circassia. The civil discord of
the great dukes, or princes, of Russia, betrayed their country to
the Tartars. They spread from Livonia to the Black Sea, and both
Moscow and Kiow, the modern and the ancient capitals, were
reduced to ashes; a temporary ruin, less fatal than the deep, and
perhaps indelible, mark, which a servitude of two hundred years
has imprinted on the character of the Russians. The Tartars
ravaged with equal fury the countries which they hoped to
possess, and those which they were hastening to leave. From the
permanent conquest of Russia they made a deadly, though
transient, inroad into the heart of Poland, and as far as the
borders of Germany. The cities of Lublin and Cracow were
obliterated: 271 they approached the shores of the Baltic; and in
the battle of Lignitz they defeated the dukes of Silesia, the
Polish palatines, and the great master of the Teutonic order, and
filled nine sacks with the right ears of the slain. From Lignitz,
the extreme point of their western march, they turned aside to
the invasion of Hungary; and the presence or spirit of Batou
inspired the host of five hundred thousand men: the Carpathian
hills could not be long impervious to their divided columns; and
their approach had been fondly disbelieved till it was
irresistibly felt. The king, Bela the Fourth, assembled the
military force of his counts and bishops; but he had alienated
the nation by adopting a vagrant horde of forty thousand families
of Comans, and these savage guests were provoked to revolt by the
suspicion of treachery and the murder of their prince. The whole
country north of the Danube was lost in a day, and depopulated in
a summer; and the ruins of cities and churches were overspread
with the bones of the natives, who expiated the sins of their
Turkish ancestors. An ecclesiastic, who fled from the sack of
Waradin, describes the calamities which he had seen, or suffered;
and the sanguinary rage of sieges and battles is far less
atrocious than the treatment of the fugitives, who had been
allured from the woods under a promise of peace and pardon and
who were coolly slaughtered as soon as they had performed the
labors of the harvest and vintage. In the winter the Tartars
passed the Danube on the ice, and advanced to Gran or Strigonium,
a German colony, and the metropolis of the kingdom. Thirty
engines were planted against the walls; the ditches were filled
with sacks of earth and dead bodies; and after a promiscuous
massacre, three hundred noble matrons were slain in the presence
of the khan. Of all the cities and fortresses of Hungary, three
alone survived the Tartar invasion, and the unfortunate Bata hid
his head among the islands of the Adriatic.
264 (return) [ See the curious extracts from the Mahometan
writers, Hist. des Mongols, p. 707.—M.]
27 (return) [ The _Dashté Kipzak_, or plain of Kipzak, extends on
either side of the Volga, in a boundless space towards the Jaik
and Borysthenes, and is supposed to contain the primitive name
and nation of the Cossacks.]
271 (return) [ Olmutz was gallantly and successfully defended by
Stenberg, Hist. des Mongols, p. 396.—M.]
The Latin world was darkened by this cloud of savage hostility: a
Russian fugitive carried the alarm to Sweden; and the remote
nations of the Baltic and the ocean trembled at the approach of
the Tartars, 28 whom their fear and ignorance were inclined to
separate from the human species. Since the invasion of the Arabs
in the eighth century, Europe had never been exposed to a similar
calamity: and if the disciples of Mahomet would have oppressed
her religion and liberty, it might be apprehended that the
shepherds of Scythia would extinguish her cities, her arts, and
all the institutions of civil society. The Roman pontiff
attempted to appease and convert these invincible Pagans by a
mission of Franciscan and Dominican friars; but he was astonished
by the reply of the khan, that the sons of God and of Zingis were
invested with a divine power to subdue or extirpate the nations;
and that the pope would be involved in the universal destruction,
unless he visited in person, and as a suppliant, the royal horde.
The emperor Frederic the Second embraced a more generous mode of
defence; and his letters to the kings of France and England, and
the princes of Germany, represented the common danger, and urged
them to arm their vassals in this just and rational crusade. 29
The Tartars themselves were awed by the fame and valor of the
Franks; the town of Newstadt in Austria was bravely defended
against them by fifty knights and twenty crossbows; and they
raised the siege on the appearance of a German army. After
wasting the adjacent kingdoms of Servia, Bosnia, and Bulgaria,
Batou slowly retreated from the Danube to the Volga to enjoyed
the rewards of victory in the city and palace of Serai, which
started at his command from the midst of the desert. 291
28 (return) [ In the year 1238, the inhabitants of Gothia
(_Sweden_) and Frise were prevented, by their fear of the
Tartars, from sending, as usual, their ships to the herring
fishery on the coast of England; and as there was no exportation,
forty or fifty of these fish were sold for a shilling, (Matthew
Paris, p. 396.) It is whimsical enough, that the orders of a
Mogul khan, who reigned on the borders of China, should have
lowered the price of herrings in the English market.]
29 (return) [ I shall copy his characteristic or flattering
epithets of the different countries of Europe: Furens ac fervens
ad arma Germania, strenuæ militiæ genitrix et alumna Francia,
bellicosa et audax Hispania, virtuosa viris et classe munita
fertilis Anglia, impetuosis bellatoribus referta Alemannia,
navalis Dacia, indomita Italia, pacis ignara Burgundia, inquieta
Apulia, cum maris Græci, Adriatici et Tyrrheni insulis pyraticis
et invictis, Cretâ, Cypro, Siciliâ, cum Oceano conterterminis
insulis, et regionibus, cruenta Hybernia, cum agili Wallia
palustris Scotia, glacialis Norwegia, suam electam militiam sub
vexillo Crucis destinabunt, &c. (Matthew Paris, p. 498.)]
291 (return) [ He was recalled by the death of Octai.—M.]
IV. Even the poor and frozen regions of the north attracted the
arms of the Moguls: Sheibani khan, the brother of the great
Batou, led a horde of fifteen thousand families into the wilds of
Siberia; and his descendants reigned at Tobolskoi above three
centuries, till the Russian conquest. The spirit of enterprise
which pursued the course of the Oby and Yenisei must have led to
the discovery of the icy sea. After brushing away the monstrous
fables, of men with dogs’ heads and cloven feet, we shall find,
that, fifteen years after the death of Zingis, the Moguls were
informed of the name and manners of the Samoyedes in the
neighborhood of the polar circle, who dwelt in subterraneous
huts, and derived their furs and their food from the sole
occupation of hunting. 30
30 (return) [ See Carpin’s relation in Hackluyt, vol. i. p. 30.
The pedigree of the khans of Siberia is given by Abulghazi, (part
viii. p. 485—495.) Have the Russians found no Tartar chronicles
at Tobolskoi? * Note: * See the account of the Mongol library in
Bergman, Nomadische Streifereyen, vol. iii. p. 185, 205, and
Remusat, Hist. des Langues Tartares, p. 327, and preface to
Schmidt, Geschichte der Ost-Mongolen.—M.]
While China, Syria, and Poland, were invaded at the same time by
the Moguls and Tartars, the authors of the mighty mischief were
content with the knowledge and declaration, that their word was
the sword of death. Like the first caliphs, the first successors
of Zingis seldom appeared in person at the head of their
victorious armies. On the banks of the Onon and Selinga, the
royal or _golden horde_ exhibited the contrast of simplicity and
greatness; of the roasted sheep and mare’s milk which composed
their banquets; and of a distribution in one day of five hundred
wagons of gold and silver. The ambassadors and princes of Europe
and Asia were compelled to undertake this distant and laborious
pilgrimage; and the life and reign of the great dukes of Russia,
the kings of Georgia and Armenia, the sultans of Iconium, and the
emirs of Persia, were decided by the frown or smile of the great
khan. The sons and grandsons of Zingis had been accustomed to the
pastoral life; but the village of Caracorum 31 was gradually
ennobled by their election and residence. A change of manners is
implied in the removal of Octai and Mangou from a tent to a
house; and their example was imitated by the princes of their
family and the great officers of the empire. Instead of the
boundless forest, the enclosure of a park afforded the more
indolent pleasures of the chase; their new habitations were
decorated with painting and sculpture; their superfluous
treasures were cast in fountains, and basins, and statues of
massy silver; and the artists of China and Paris vied with each
other in the service of the great khan. 32 Caracorum contained
two streets, the one of Chinese mechanics, the other of Mahometan
traders; and the places of religious worship, one Nestorian
church, two mosques, and twelve temples of various idols, may
represent in some degree the number and division of inhabitants.
Yet a French missionary declares, that the town of St. Denys,
near Paris, was more considerable than the Tartar capital; and
that the whole palace of Mangou was scarcely equal to a tenth
part of that Benedictine abbey. The conquests of Russia and Syria
might amuse the vanity of the great khans; but they were seated
on the borders of China; the acquisition of that empire was the
nearest and most interesting object; and they might learn from
their pastoral economy, that it is for the advantage of the
shepherd to protect and propagate his flock. I have already
celebrated the wisdom and virtue of a Mandarin who prevented the
desolation of five populous and cultivated provinces. In a
spotless administration of thirty years, this friend of his
country and of mankind continually labored to mitigate, or
suspend, the havoc of war; to save the monuments, and to rekindle
the flame, of science; to restrain the military commander by the
restoration of civil magistrates; and to instil the love of peace
and justice into the minds of the Moguls. He struggled with the
barbarism of the first conquerors; but his salutary lessons
produced a rich harvest in the second generation. 321 The
northern, and by degrees the southern, empire acquiesced in the
government of Cublai, the lieutenant, and afterwards the
successor, of Mangou; and the nation was loyal to a prince who
had been educated in the manners of China. He restored the forms
of her venerable constitution; and the victors submitted to the
laws, the fashions, and even the prejudices, of the vanquished
people. This peaceful triumph, which has been more than once
repeated, may be ascribed, in a great measure, to the numbers and
servitude of the Chinese. The Mogul army was dissolved in a vast
and populous country; and their emperors adopted with pleasure a
political system, which gives to the prince the solid substance
of despotism, and leaves to the subject the empty names of
philosophy, freedom, and filial obedience. 322 Under the reign of
Cublai, letters and commerce, peace and justice, were restored;
the great canal, of five hundred miles, was opened from Nankin to
the capital: he fixed his residence at Pekin; and displayed in
his court the magnificence of the greatest monarch of Asia. Yet
this learned prince declined from the pure and simple religion of
his great ancestor: he sacrificed to the idol Fo; and his blind
attachment to the lamas of Thibet and the bonzes of China 33
provoked the censure of the disciples of Confucius. His
successors polluted the palace with a crowd of eunuchs,
physicians, and astrologers, while thirteen millions of their
subjects were consumed in the provinces by famine. One hundred
and forty years after the death of Zingis, his degenerate race,
the dynasty of the Yuen, was expelled by a revolt of the native
Chinese; and the Mogul emperors were lost in the oblivion of the
desert. Before this revolution, they had forfeited their
supremacy over the dependent branches of their house, the khans
of Kipzak and Russia, the khans of Zagatai, or Transoxiana, and
the khans of Iran or Persia. By their distance and power, these
royal lieutenants had soon been released from the duties of
obedience; and after the death of Cublai, they scorned to accept
a sceptre or a title from his unworthy successors. According to
their respective situations, they maintained the simplicity of
the pastoral life, or assumed the luxury of the cities of Asia;
but the princes and their hordes were alike disposed for the
reception of a foreign worship. After some hesitation between the
Gospel and the Koran, they conformed to the religion of Mahomet;
and while they adopted for their brethren the Arabs and Persians,
they renounced all intercourse with the ancient Moguls, the
idolaters of China.
31 (return) [ The Map of D’Anville and the Chinese Itineraries
(De Guignes, tom. i. part ii. p. 57) seem to mark the position of
Holin, or Caracorum, about six hundred miles to the north-west of
Pekin. The distance between Selinginsky and Pekin is near 2000
Russian versts, between 1300 and 1400 English miles, (Bell’s
Travels, vol. ii. p. 67.)]
32 (return) [ Rubruquis found at Caracorum his _countryman
Guillaume Boucher, orfevre de Paris_, who had executed for the
khan a silver tree supported by four lions, and ejecting four
different liquors. Abulghazi (part iv. p. 366) mentions the
painters of Kitay or China.]
321 (return) [ See the interesting sketch of the life of this
minister (Yelin-Thsouthsai) in the second volume of the second
series of Recherches Asiatiques, par A Remusat, p. 64.—M.]
322 (return) [ Compare Hist. des Mongols, p. 616.—M.]
33 (return) [ The attachment of the khans, and the hatred of the
mandarins, to the bonzes and lamas (Duhalde, Hist. de la Chine,
tom. i. p. 502, 503) seems to represent them as the priests of
the same god, of the Indian _Fo_, whose worship prevails among
the sects of Hindostan Siam, Thibet, China, and Japan. But this
mysterious subject is still lost in a cloud, which the
researchers of our Asiatic Society may gradually dispel.]
Chapter LXIV: Moguls, Ottoman Turks.—Part III.
In this shipwreck of nations, some surprise may be excited by the
escape of the Roman empire, whose relics, at the time of the
Mogul invasion, were dismembered by the Greeks and Latins. Less
potent than Alexander, they were pressed, like the Macedonian,
both in Europe and Asia, by the shepherds of Scythia; and had the
Tartars undertaken the siege, Constantinople must have yielded to
the fate of Pekin, Samarcand, and Bagdad. The glorious and
voluntary retreat of Batou from the Danube was insulted by the
vain triumph of the Franks and Greeks; 34 and in a second
expedition death surprised him in full march to attack the
capital of the Cæsars. His brother Borga carried the Tartar arms
into Bulgaria and Thrace; but he was diverted from the Byzantine
war by a visit to Novogorod, in the fifty-seventh degree of
latitude, where he numbered the inhabitants and regulated the
tributes of Russia. The Mogul khan formed an alliance with the
Mamalukes against his brethren of Persia: three hundred thousand
horse penetrated through the gates of Derbend; and the Greeks
might rejoice in the first example of domestic war. After the
recovery of Constantinople, Michael Palæologus, 35 at a distance
from his court and army, was surprised and surrounded in a
Thracian castle, by twenty thousand Tartars. But the object of
their march was a private interest: they came to the deliverance
of Azzadin, the Turkish sultan; and were content with his person
and the treasure of the emperor. Their general Noga, whose name
is perpetuated in the hordes of Astracan, raised a formidable
rebellion against Mengo Timour, the third of the khans of Kipzak;
obtained in marriage Maria, the natural daughter of Palæologus;
and guarded the dominions of his friend and father. The
subsequent invasions of a Scythian cast were those of outlaws and
fugitives: and some thousands of Alani and Comans, who had been
driven from their native seats, were reclaimed from a vagrant
life, and enlisted in the service of the empire. Such was the
influence in Europe of the invasion of the Moguls. The first
terror of their arms secured, rather than disturbed, the peace of
the Roman Asia. The sultan of Iconium solicited a personal
interview with John Vataces; and his artful policy encouraged the
Turks to defend their barrier against the common enemy. 36 That
barrier indeed was soon overthrown; and the servitude and ruin of
the Seljukians exposed the nakedness of the Greeks. The
formidable Holagou threatened to march to Constantinople at the
head of four hundred thousand men; and the groundless panic of
the citizens of Nice will present an image of the terror which he
had inspired. The accident of a procession, and the sound of a
doleful litany, “From the fury of the Tartars, good Lord, deliver
us,” had scattered the hasty report of an assault and massacre.
In the blind credulity of fear, the streets of Nice were crowded
with thousands of both sexes, who knew not from what or to whom
they fled; and some hours elapsed before the firmness of the
military officers could relieve the city from this imaginary foe.
But the ambition of Holagou and his successors was fortunately
diverted by the conquest of Bagdad, and a long vicissitude of
Syrian wars; their hostility to the Moslems inclined them to
unite with the Greeks and Franks; 37 and their generosity or
contempt had offered the kingdom of Anatolia as the reward of an
Armenian vassal. The fragments of the Seljukian monarchy were
disputed by the emirs who had occupied the cities or the
mountains; but they all confessed the supremacy of the khans of
Persia; and he often interposed his authority, and sometimes his
arms, to check their depredations, and to preserve the peace and
balance of his Turkish frontier. The death of Cazan, 38 one of
the greatest and most accomplished princes of the house of
Zingis, removed this salutary control; and the decline of the
Moguls gave a free scope to the rise and progress of the Ottoman
Empire. 39
34 (return) [ Some repulse of the Moguls in Hungary (Matthew
Paris, p. 545, 546) might propagate and color the report of the
union and victory of the kings of the Franks on the confines of
Bulgaria. Abulpharagius (Dynast. p. 310) after forty years,
beyond the Tigris, might be easily deceived.]
35 (return) [ See Pachymer, l. iii. c. 25, and l. ix. c. 26, 27;
and the false alarm at Nice, l. iii. c. 27. Nicephorus Gregoras,
l. iv. c. 6.]
36 (return) [ G. Acropolita, p. 36, 37. Nic. Greg. l. ii. c. 6,
l. iv. c. 5.]
37 (return) [ Abulpharagius, who wrote in the year 1284, declares
that the Moguls, since the fabulous defeat of Batou, had not
attacked either the Franks or Greeks; and of this he is a
competent witness. Hayton likewise, the Armenian prince,
celebrates their friendship for himself and his nation.]
38 (return) [ Pachymer gives a splendid character of Cazan Khan,
the rival of Cyrus and Alexander, (l. xii. c. 1.) In the
conclusion of his history (l. xiii. c. 36) he _hopes_ much from
the arrival of 30,000 Tochars, or Tartars, who were ordered by
the successor of Cazan to restrain the Turks of Bithynia, A.D.
1308.]
39 (return) [ The origin of the Ottoman dynasty is illustrated by
the critical learning of Mm. De Guignes (Hist. des Huns, tom. iv.
p. 329—337) and D’Anville, (Empire Turc, p. 14—22,) two
inhabitants of Paris, from whom the Orientals may learn the
history and geography of their own country. * Note: They may be
still more enlightened by the Geschichte des Osman Reiches, by M.
von Hammer Purgstall of Vienna.—M.]
After the retreat of Zingis, the sultan Gelaleddin of Carizme had
returned from India to the possession and defence of his Persian
kingdoms. In the space of eleven years, that hero fought in
person fourteen battles; and such was his activity, that he led
his cavalry in seventeen days from Teflis to Kerman, a march of a
thousand miles. Yet he was oppressed by the jealousy of the
Moslem princes, and the innumerable armies of the Moguls; and
after his last defeat, Gelaleddin perished ignobly in the
mountains of Curdistan. His death dissolved a veteran and
adventurous army, which included under the name of Carizmians or
Corasmins many Turkman hordes, that had attached themselves to
the sultan’s fortune. The bolder and more powerful chiefs invaded
Syria, and violated the holy sepulchre of Jerusalem: the more
humble engaged in the service of Aladin, sultan of Iconium; and
among these were the obscure fathers of the Ottoman line. They
had formerly pitched their tents near the southern banks of the
Oxus, in the plains of Mahan and Nesa; and it is somewhat
remarkable, that the same spot should have produced the first
authors of the Parthian and Turkish empires. At the head, or in
the rear, of a Carizmian army, Soliman Shah was drowned in the
passage of the Euphrates: his son Orthogrul became the soldier
and subject of Aladin, and established at Surgut, on the banks of
the Sangar, a camp of four hundred families or tents, whom he
governed fifty-two years both in peace and war. He was the father
of Thaman, or Athman, whose Turkish name has been melted into the
appellation of the caliph Othman; and if we describe that
pastoral chief as a shepherd and a robber, we must separate from
those characters all idea of ignominy and baseness. Othman
possessed, and perhaps surpassed, the ordinary virtues of a
soldier; and the circumstances of time and place were propitious
to his independence and success. The Seljukian dynasty was no
more; and the distance and decline of the Mogul khans soon
enfranchised him from the control of a superior. He was situate
on the verge of the Greek empire: the Koran sanctified his
_gazi_, or holy war, against the infidels; and their political
errors unlocked the passes of Mount Olympus, and invited him to
descend into the plains of Bithynia. Till the reign of
Palæologus, these passes had been vigilantly guarded by the
militia of the country, who were repaid by their own safety and
an exemption from taxes. The emperor abolished their privilege
and assumed their office; but the tribute was rigorously
collected, the custody of the passes was neglected, and the hardy
mountaineers degenerated into a trembling crowd of peasants
without spirit or discipline. It was on the twenty-seventh of
July, in the year twelve hundred and ninety-nine of the Christian
æra, that Othman first invaded the territory of Nicomedia; 40 and
the singular accuracy of the date seems to disclose some
foresight of the rapid and destructive growth of the monster. The
annals of the twenty-seven years of his reign would exhibit a
repetition of the same inroads; and his hereditary troops were
multiplied in each campaign by the accession of captives and
volunteers. Instead of retreating to the hills, he maintained the
most useful and defensive posts; fortified the towns and castles
which he had first pillaged; and renounced the pastoral life for
the baths and palaces of his infant capitals. But it was not till
Othman was oppressed by age and infirmities, that he received the
welcome news of the conquest of Prusa, which had been surrendered
by famine or treachery to the arms of his son Orchan. The glory
of Othman is chiefly founded on that of his descendants; but the
Turks have transcribed or composed a royal testament of his last
counsels of justice and moderation. 41
40 (return) [ See Pachymer, l. x. c. 25, 26, l. xiii. c. 33, 34,
36; and concerning the guard of the mountains, l. i. c. 3—6:
Nicephorus Gregoras, l. vii. c. l., and the first book of
Laonicus Chalcondyles, the Athenian.]
41 (return) [ I am ignorant whether the Turks have any writers
older than Mahomet II., * nor can I reach beyond a meagre
chronicle (Annales Turcici ad Annum 1550) translated by John
Gaudier, and published by Leunclavius, (ad calcem Laonic.
Chalcond. p. 311—350,) with copious pandects, or commentaries.
The history of the Growth and Decay (A.D. 1300—1683) of the
Othman empire was translated into English from the Latin MS. of
Demetrius Cantemir, prince of Moldavia, (London, 1734, in folio.)
The author is guilty of strange blunders in Oriental history; but
he was conversant with the language, the annals, and institutions
of the Turks. Cantemir partly draws his materials from the
Synopsis of Saadi Effendi of Larissa, dedicated in the year 1696
to Sultan Mustapha, and a valuable abridgment of the original
historians. In one of the Ramblers, Dr. Johnson praises Knolles
(a General History of the Turks to the present Year. London,
1603) as the first of historians, unhappy only in the choice of
his subject. Yet I much doubt whether a partial and verbose
compilation from Latin writers, thirteen hundred folio pages of
speeches and battles, can either instruct or amuse an enlightened
age, which requires from the historian some tincture of
philosophy and criticism. Note: * We could have wished that M.
von Hammer had given a more clear and distinct reply to this
question of Gibbon. In a note, vol. i. p. 630. M. von Hammer
shows that they had not only sheiks (religious writers) and
learned lawyers, but poets and authors on medicine. But the
inquiry of Gibbon obviously refers to historians. The oldest of
their historical works, of which V. Hammer makes use, is the
“Tarichi Aaschik Paschasade,” i. e. the History of the Great
Grandson of Aaschik Pasha, who was a dervis and celebrated
ascetic poet in the reign of Murad (Amurath) I. Ahmed, the author
of the work, lived during the reign of Bajazet II., but, he says,
derived much information from the book of Scheik Jachshi, the son
of Elias, who was Imaum to Sultan Orchan, (the second Ottoman
king) and who related, from the lips of his father, the
circumstances of the earliest Ottoman history. This book (having
searched for it in vain for five-and-twenty years) our author
found at length in the Vatican. All the other Turkish histories
on his list, as indeed this, were _written_ during the reign of
Mahomet II. It does not appear whether any of the rest cite
earlier authorities of equal value with that claimed by the
“Tarichi Aaschik Paschasade.”—M. (in Quarterly Review, vol. xlix.
p. 292.)]
From the conquest of Prusa, we may date the true æra of the
Ottoman empire. The lives and possessions of the Christian
subjects were redeemed by a tribute or ransom of thirty thousand
crowns of gold; and the city, by the labors of Orchan, assumed
the aspect of a Mahometan capital; Prusa was decorated with a
mosque, a college, and a hospital, of royal foundation; the
Seljukian coin was changed for the name and impression of the new
dynasty: and the most skilful professors, of human and divine
knowledge, attracted the Persian and Arabian students from the
ancient schools of Oriental learning. The office of vizier was
instituted for Aladin, the brother of Orchan; 411 and a different
habit distinguished the citizens from the peasants, the Moslems
from the infidels. All the troops of Othman had consisted of
loose squadrons of Turkman cavalry; who served without pay and
fought without discipline: but a regular body of infantry was
first established and trained by the prudence of his son. A great
number of volunteers was enrolled with a small stipend, but with
the permission of living at home, unless they were summoned to
the field: their rude manners, and seditious temper, disposed
Orchan to educate his young captives as his soldiers and those of
the prophet; but the Turkish peasants were still allowed to mount
on horseback, and follow his standard, with the appellation and
the hopes of _freebooters_. 412 By these arts he formed an army
of twenty-five thousand Moslems: a train of battering engines was
framed for the use of sieges; and the first successful experiment
was made on the cities of Nice and Nicomedia. Orchan granted a
safe-conduct to all who were desirous of departing with their
families and effects; but the widows of the slain were given in
marriage to the conquerors; and the sacrilegious plunder, the
books, the vases, and the images, were sold or ransomed at
Constantinople. The emperor Andronicus the Younger was vanquished
and wounded by the son of Othman: 42 421 he subdued the whole
province or kingdom of Bithynia, as far as the shores of the
Bosphorus and Hellespont; and the Christians confessed the
justice and clemency of a reign which claimed the voluntary
attachment of the Turks of Asia. Yet Orchan was content with the
modest title of emir; and in the list of his compeers, the
princes of Roum or Anatolia, 43 his military forces were
surpassed by the emirs of Ghermian and Caramania, each of whom
could bring into the field an army of forty thousand men. Their
domains were situate in the heart of the Seljukian kingdom; but
the holy warriors, though of inferior note, who formed new
principalities on the Greek empire, are more conspicuous in the
light of history. The maritime country from the Propontis to the
Mæander and the Isle of Rhodes, so long threatened and so often
pillaged, was finally lost about the thirteenth year of
Andronicus the Elder. 44 Two Turkish chieftains, Sarukhan and
Aidin, left their names to their conquests, and their conquests
to their posterity. The captivity or ruin of the _seven_ churches
of Asia was consummated; and the barbarous lords of Ionia and
Lydia still trample on the monuments of classic and Christian
antiquity. In the loss of Ephesus, the Christians deplored the
fall of the first angel, the extinction of the first candlestick,
of the Revelations; 45 the desolation is complete; and the temple
of Diana, or the church of Mary, will equally elude the search of
the curious traveller. The circus and three stately theatres of
Laodicea are now peopled with wolves and foxes; Sardes is reduced
to a miserable village; the God of Mahomet, without a rival or a
son, is invoked in the mosques of Thyatira and Pergamus; and the
populousness of Smyrna is supported by the foreign trade of the
Franks and Armenians. Philadelphia alone has been saved by
prophecy, or courage. At a distance from the sea, forgotten by
the emperors, encompassed on all sides by the Turks, her valiant
citizens defended their religion and freedom above fourscore
years; and at length capitulated with the proudest of the
Ottomans. Among the Greek colonies and churches of Asia,
Philadelphia is still erect; a column in a scene of ruins; a
pleasing example, that the paths of honor and safety may
sometimes be the same. The servitude of Rhodes was delayed about
two centuries by the establishment of the knights of St. John of
Jerusalem: 46 under the discipline of the order, that island
emerged into fame and opulence; the noble and warlike monks were
renowned by land and sea: and the bulwark of Christendom
provoked, and repelled, the arms of the Turks and Saracens.
411 (return) [ Von Hammer, Osm. Geschichte, vol. i. p. 82.—M.]
412 (return) [ Ibid. p. 91.—M.]
42 (return) [ Cantacuzene, though he relates the battle and
heroic flight of the younger Andronicus, (l. ii. c. 6, 7, 8,)
dissembles by his silence the loss of Prusa, Nice, and Nicomedia,
which are fairly confessed by Nicephorus Gregoras, (l. viii. 15,
ix. 9, 13, xi. 6.) It appears that Nice was taken by Orchan in
1330, and Nicomedia in 1339, which are somewhat different from
the Turkish dates.]
421 (return) [ For the conquests of Orchan over the ten
pachaliks, or kingdoms of the Seljukians, in Asia Minor. see V.
Hammer, vol. i. p. 112.—M.]
43 (return) [ The partition of the Turkish emirs is extracted
from two contemporaries, the Greek Nicephorus Gregoras (l. vii.
1) and the Arabian Marakeschi, (De Guignes, tom. ii. P. ii. p.
76, 77.) See likewise the first book of Laonicus Chalcondyles.]
44 (return) [ Pachymer, l. xiii. c. 13.]
45 (return) [ See the Travels of Wheeler and Spon, of Pocock and
Chandler, and more particularly Smith’s Survey of the Seven
Churches of Asia, p. 205—276. The more pious antiquaries labor to
reconcile the promises and threats of the author of the
Revelations with the _present_ state of the seven cities. Perhaps
it would be more prudent to confine his predictions to the
characters and events of his own times.]
46 (return) [ Consult the ivth book of the Histoire de l’Ordre de
Malthe, par l’Abbé de Vertot. That pleasing writer betrays his
ignorance, in supposing that Othman, a freebooter of the
Bithynian hills, could besiege Rhodes by sea and land.]
The Greeks, by their intestine divisions, were the authors of
their final ruin. During the civil wars of the elder and younger
Andronicus, the son of Othman achieved, almost without
resistance, the conquest of Bithynia; and the same disorders
encouraged the Turkish emirs of Lydia and Ionia to build a fleet,
and to pillage the adjacent islands and the sea-coast of Europe.
In the defence of his life and honor, Cantacuzene was tempted to
prevent, or imitate, his adversaries, by calling to his aid the
public enemies of his religion and country. Amir, the son of
Aidin, concealed under a Turkish garb the humanity and politeness
of a Greek; he was united with the great domestic by mutual
esteem and reciprocal services; and their friendship is compared,
in the vain rhetoric of the times, to the perfect union of
Orestes and Pylades. 47 On the report of the danger of his
friend, who was persecuted by an ungrateful court, the prince of
Ionia assembled at Smyrna a fleet of three hundred vessels, with
an army of twenty-nine thousand men; sailed in the depth of
winter, and cast anchor at the mouth of the Hebrus. From thence,
with a chosen band of two thousand Turks, he marched along the
banks of the river, and rescued the empress, who was besieged in
Demotica by the wild Bulgarians. At that disastrous moment, the
life or death of his beloved Cantacuzene was concealed by his
flight into Servia: but the grateful Irene, impatient to behold
her deliverer, invited him to enter the city, and accompanied her
message with a present of rich apparel and a hundred horses. By a
peculiar strain of delicacy, the Gentle Barbarian refused, in the
absence of an unfortunate friend, to visit his wife, or to taste
the luxuries of the palace; sustained in his tent the rigor of
the winter; and rejected the hospitable gift, that he might share
the hardships of two thousand companions, all as deserving as
himself of that honor and distinction. Necessity and revenge
might justify his predatory excursions by sea and land: he left
nine thousand five hundred men for the guard of his fleet; and
persevered in the fruitless search of Cantacuzene, till his
embarkation was hastened by a fictitious letter, the severity of
the season, the clamors of his independent troops, and the weight
of his spoil and captives. In the prosecution of the civil war,
the prince of Ionia twice returned to Europe; joined his arms
with those of the emperor; besieged Thessalonica, and threatened
Constantinople. Calumny might affix some reproach on his
imperfect aid, his hasty departure, and a bribe of ten thousand
crowns, which he accepted from the Byzantine court; but his
friend was satisfied; and the conduct of Amir is excused by the
more sacred duty of defending against the Latins his hereditary
dominions. The maritime power of the Turks had united the pope,
the king of Cyprus, the republic of Venice, and the order of St.
John, in a laudable crusade; their galleys invaded the coast of
Ionia; and Amir was slain with an arrow, in the attempt to wrest
from the Rhodian knights the citadel of Smyrna. 48 Before his
death, he generously recommended another ally of his own nation;
not more sincere or zealous than himself, but more able to afford
a prompt and powerful succor, by his situation along the
Propontis and in the front of Constantinople. By the prospect of
a more advantageous treaty, the Turkish prince of Bithynia was
detached from his engagements with Anne of Savoy; and the pride
of Orchan dictated the most solemn protestations, that if he
could obtain the daughter of Cantacuzene, he would invariably
fulfil the duties of a subject and a son. Parental tenderness was
silenced by the voice of ambition: the Greek clergy connived at
the marriage of a Christian princess with a sectary of Mahomet;
and the father of Theodora describes, with shameful satisfaction,
the dishonor of the purple. 49 A body of Turkish cavalry attended
the ambassadors, who disembarked from thirty vessels, before his
camp of Selybria. A stately pavilion was erected, in which the
empress Irene passed the night with her daughters. In the
morning, Theodora ascended a throne, which was surrounded with
curtains of silk and gold: the troops were under arms; but the
emperor alone was on horseback. At a signal the curtains were
suddenly withdrawn to disclose the bride, or the victim,
encircled by kneeling eunuchs and hymeneal torches: the sound of
flutes and trumpets proclaimed the joyful event; and her
pretended happiness was the theme of the nuptial song, which was
chanted by such poets as the age could produce. Without the rites
of the church, Theodora was delivered to her barbarous lord: but
it had been stipulated, that she should preserve her religion in
the harem of Bursa; and her father celebrates her charity and
devotion in this ambiguous situation. After his peaceful
establishment on the throne of Constantinople, the Greek emperor
visited his Turkish ally, who with four sons, by various wives,
expected him at Scutari, on the Asiatic shore. The two princes
partook, with seeming cordiality, of the pleasures of the banquet
and the chase; and Theodora was permitted to repass the
Bosphorus, and to enjoy some days in the society of her mother.
But the friendship of Orchan was subservient to his religion and
interest; and in the Genoese war he joined without a blush the
enemies of Cantacuzene.
47 (return) [ Nicephorus Gregoras has expatiated with pleasure on
this amiable character, (l. xii. 7, xiii. 4, 10, xiv. 1, 9, xvi.
6.) Cantacuzene speaks with honor and esteem of his ally, (l.
iii. c. 56, 57, 63, 64, 66, 67, 68, 86, 89, 95, 96;) but he seems
ignorant of his own sentimental passion for the Turks, and
indirectly denies the possibility of such unnatural friendship,
(l. iv. c. 40.)]
48 (return) [ After the conquest of Smyrna by the Latins, the
defence of this fortress was imposed by Pope Gregory XI. on the
knights of Rhodes, (see Vertot, l. v.)]
49 (return) [ See Cantacuzenus, l. iii. c. 95. Nicephorus
Gregoras, who, for the light of Mount Thabor, brands the emperor
with the names of tyrant and Herod, excuses, rather than blames,
this Turkish marriage, and alleges the passion and power of
Orchan, eggutatoV, kai th dunamo? touV kat’ auton hdh PersikouV
(Turkish) uperairwn SatrapaV, (l. xv. 5.) He afterwards
celebrates his kingdom and armies. See his reign in Cantemir, p.
24—30.]
In the treaty with the empress Anne, the Ottoman prince had
inserted a singular condition, that it should be lawful for him
to sell his prisoners at Constantinople, or transport them into
Asia. A naked crowd of Christians of both sexes and every age, of
priests and monks, of matrons and virgins, was exposed in the
public market; the whip was frequently used to quicken the
charity of redemption; and the indigent Greeks deplored the fate
of their brethren, who were led away to the worst evils of
temporal and spiritual bondage 50 Cantacuzene was reduced to
subscribe the same terms; and their execution must have been
still more pernicious to the empire: a body of ten thousand Turks
had been detached to the assistance of the empress Anne; but the
entire forces of Orchan were exerted in the service of his
father. Yet these calamities were of a transient nature; as soon
as the storm had passed away, the fugitives might return to their
habitations; and at the conclusion of the civil and foreign wars,
Europe was completely evacuated by the Moslems of Asia. It was in
his last quarrel with his pupil that Cantacuzene inflicted the
deep and deadly wound, which could never be healed by his
successors, and which is poorly expiated by his theological
dialogues against the prophet Mahomet. Ignorant of their own
history, the modern Turks confound their first and their final
passage of the Hellespont, 51 and describe the son of Orchan as a
nocturnal robber, who, with eighty companions, explores by
stratagem a hostile and unknown shore. Soliman, at the head of
ten thousand horse, was transported in the vessels, and
entertained as the friend, of the Greek emperor. In the civil
wars of Romania, he performed some service and perpetrated more
mischief; but the Chersonesus was insensibly filled with a
Turkish colony; and the Byzantine court solicited in vain the
restitution of the fortresses of Thrace. After some artful delays
between the Ottoman prince and his son, their ransom was valued
at sixty thousand crowns, and the first payment had been made
when an earthquake shook the walls and cities of the provinces;
the dismantled places were occupied by the Turks; and Gallipoli,
the key of the Hellespont, was rebuilt and repeopled by the
policy of Soliman. The abdication of Cantacuzene dissolved the
feeble bands of domestic alliance; and his last advice admonished
his countrymen to decline a rash contest, and to compare their
own weakness with the numbers and valor, the discipline and
enthusiasm, of the Moslems. His prudent counsels were despised by
the headstrong vanity of youth, and soon justified by the
victories of the Ottomans. But as he practised in the field the
exercise of the _jerid_, Soliman was killed by a fall from his
horse; and the aged Orchan wept and expired on the tomb of his
valiant son. 511
50 (return) [ The most lively and concise picture of this
captivity may be found in the history of Ducas, (c. 8,) who
fairly describes what Cantacuzene confesses with a guilty blush!]
51 (return) [ In this passage, and the first conquests in Europe,
Cantemir (p. 27, &c.) gives a miserable idea of his Turkish
guides; nor am I much better satisfied with Chalcondyles, (l. i.
p. 12, &c.) They forget to consult the most authentic record, the
ivth book of Cantacuzene. I likewise regret the last books, which
are still manuscript, of Nicephorus Gregoras. * Note: Von Hammer
excuses the silence with which the Turkish historians pass over
the earlier intercourse of the Ottomans with the European
continent, of which he enumerates sixteen different occasions, as
if they disdained those peaceful incursions by which they gained
no conquest, and established no permanent footing on the
Byzantine territory. Of the romantic account of Soliman’s first
expedition, he says, “As yet the prose of history had not
asserted its right over the poetry of tradition.” This defence
would scarcely be accepted as satisfactory by the historian of
the Decline and Fall.—M. (in Quarterly Review, vol. xlix. p.
293.)]
511 (return) [ In the 75th year of his age, the 35th of his
reign. V. Hammer. M.]
Chapter LXIV: Moguls, Ottoman Turks.—Part IV.
But the Greeks had not time to rejoice in the death of their
enemies; and the Turkish cimeter was wielded with the same spirit
by Amurath the First, the son of Orchan, and the brother of
Soliman. By the pale and fainting light of the Byzantine annals,
52 we can discern, that he subdued without resistance the whole
province of Romania or Thrace, from the Hellespont to Mount
Hæmus, and the verge of the capital; and that Adrianople was
chosen for the royal seat of his government and religion in
Europe. Constantinople, whose decline is almost coeval with her
foundation, had often, in the lapse of a thousand years, been
assaulted by the Barbarians of the East and West; but never till
this fatal hour had the Greeks been surrounded, both in Asia and
Europe, by the arms of the same hostile monarchy. Yet the
prudence or generosity of Amurath postponed for a while this easy
conquest; and his pride was satisfied with the frequent and
humble attendance of the emperor John Palæologus and his four
sons, who followed at his summons the court and camp of the
Ottoman prince. He marched against the Sclavonian nations between
the Danube and the Adriatic, the Bulgarians, Servians, Bosnians,
and Albanians; and these warlike tribes, who had so often
insulted the majesty of the empire, were repeatedly broken by his
destructive inroads. Their countries did not abound either in
gold or silver; nor were their rustic hamlets and townships
enriched by commerce or decorated by the arts of luxury. But the
natives of the soil have been distinguished in every age by their
hardiness of mind and body; and they were converted by a prudent
institution into the firmest and most faithful supporters of the
Ottoman greatness. 53 The vizier of Amurath reminded his
sovereign that, according to the Mahometan law, he was entitled
to a fifth part of the spoil and captives; and that the duty
might easily be levied, if vigilant officers were stationed in
Gallipoli, to watch the passage, and to select for his use the
stoutest and most beautiful of the Christian youth. The advice
was followed: the edict was proclaimed; many thousands of the
European captives were educated in religion and arms; and the new
militia was consecrated and named by a celebrated dervis.
Standing in the front of their ranks, he stretched the sleeve of
his gown over the head of the foremost soldier, and his blessing
was delivered in these words: “Let them be called Janizaries,
(_Yengi cheri_, or new soldiers;) may their countenance be ever
bright! their hand victorious! their sword keen! may their spear
always hang over the heads of their enemies! and wheresoever they
go, may they return with a _white face!_” 54 541 Such was the
origin of these haughty troops, the terror of the nations, and
sometimes of the sultans themselves. Their valor has declined,
their discipline is relaxed, and their tumultuary array is
incapable of contending with the order and weapons of modern
tactics; but at the time of their institution, they possessed a
decisive superiority in war; since a regular body of infantry, in
constant exercise and pay, was not maintained by any of the
princes of Christendom. The Janizaries fought with the zeal of
proselytes against their _idolatrous_ countrymen; and in the
battle of Cossova, the league and independence of the Sclavonian
tribes was finally crushed. As the conqueror walked over the
field, he observed that the greatest part of the slain consisted
of beardless youths; and listened to the flattering reply of his
vizier, that age and wisdom would have taught them not to oppose
his irresistible arms. But the sword of his Janizaries could not
defend him from the dagger of despair; a Servian soldier started
from the crowd of dead bodies, and Amurath was pierced in the
belly with a mortal wound. 542 The grandson of Othman was mild in
his temper, modest in his apparel, and a lover of learning and
virtue; but the Moslems were scandalized at his absence from
public worship; and he was corrected by the firmness of the
mufti, who dared to reject his testimony in a civil cause: a
mixture of servitude and freedom not unfrequent in Oriental
history. 55
52 (return) [ After the conclusion of Cantacuzene and Gregoras,
there follows a dark interval of a hundred years. George Phranza,
Michael Ducas, and Laonicus Chalcondyles, all three wrote after
the taking of Constantinople.]
53 (return) [ See Cantemir, p. 37—41, with his own large and
curious annotations.]
54 (return) [ _White_ and _black_ face are common and proverbial
expressions of praise and reproach in the Turkish language. Hic
_niger_ est, hunc tu Romane caveto, was likewise a Latin
sentence.]
541 (return) [ According to Von Hammer. vol. i. p. 90, Gibbon and
the European writers assign too late a date to this enrolment of
the Janizaries. It took place not in the reign of Amurath, but in
that of his predecessor Orchan.—M.]
542 (return) [ Ducas has related this as a deliberate act of
self-devotion on the part of a Servian noble who pretended to
desert, and stabbed Amurath during a conference which he had
requested. The Italian translator of Ducas, published by Bekker
in the new edition of the Byzantines, has still further
heightened the romance. See likewise in Von Hammer (Osmanische
Geschichte, vol. i. p. 138) the popular Servian account, which
resembles that of Ducas, and may have been the source of that of
his Italian translator. The Turkish account agrees more nearly
with Gibbon; but the Servian, (Milosch Kohilovisch) while he lay
among the heap of the dead, pretended to have some secret to
impart to Amurath, and stabbed him while he leaned over to
listen.—M.]
55 (return) [ See the life and death of Morad, or Amurath I., in
Cantemir, (p 33—45,) the first book of Chalcondyles, and the
Annales Turcici of Leunclavius. According to another story, the
sultan was stabbed by a Croat in his tent; and this accident was
alleged to Busbequius (Epist i. p. 98) as an excuse for the
unworthy precaution of pinioning, as if were, between two
attendants, an ambassador’s arms, when he is introduced to the
royal presence.]
The character of Bajazet, the son and successor of Amurath, is
strongly expressed in his surname of _Ilderim_, or the lightning;
and he might glory in an epithet, which was drawn from the fiery
energy of his soul and the rapidity of his destructive march. In
the fourteen years of his reign, 56 he incessantly moved at the
head of his armies, from Boursa to Adrianople, from the Danube to
the Euphrates; and, though he strenuously labored for the
propagation of the law, he invaded, with impartial ambition, the
Christian and Mahometan princes of Europe and Asia. From Angora
to Amasia and Erzeroum, the northern regions of Anatolia were
reduced to his obedience: he stripped of their hereditary
possessions his brother emirs of Ghermian and Caramania, of Aidin
and Sarukhan; and after the conquest of Iconium the ancient
kingdom of the Seljukians again revived in the Ottoman dynasty.
Nor were the conquests of Bajazet less rapid or important in
Europe. No sooner had he imposed a regular form of servitude on
the Servians and Bulgarians, than he passed the Danube to seek
new enemies and new subjects in the heart of Moldavia. 57
Whatever yet adhered to the Greek empire in Thrace, Macedonia,
and Thessaly, acknowledged a Turkish master: an obsequious bishop
led him through the gates of Thermopylæ into Greece; and we may
observe, as a singular fact, that the widow of a Spanish chief,
who possessed the ancient seat of the oracle of Delphi, deserved
his favor by the sacrifice of a beauteous daughter. The Turkish
communication between Europe and Asia had been dangerous and
doubtful, till he stationed at Gallipoli a fleet of galleys, to
command the Hellespont and intercept the Latin succors of
Constantinople. While the monarch indulged his passions in a
boundless range of injustice and cruelty, he imposed on his
soldiers the most rigid laws of modesty and abstinence; and the
harvest was peaceably reaped and sold within the precincts of his
camp. Provoked by the loose and corrupt administration of
justice, he collected in a house the judges and lawyers of his
dominions, who expected that in a few moments the fire would be
kindled to reduce them to ashes. His ministers trembled in
silence: but an Æthiopian buffoon presumed to insinuate the true
cause of the evil; and future venality was left without excuse,
by annexing an adequate salary to the office of cadhi. 58 The
humble title of emir was no longer suitable to the Ottoman
greatness; and Bajazet condescended to accept a patent of sultan
from the caliphs who served in Egypt under the yoke of the
Mamalukes: 59 a last and frivolous homage that was yielded by
force to opinion; by the Turkish conquerors to the house of Abbas
and the successors of the Arabian prophet. The ambition of the
sultan was inflamed by the obligation of deserving this august
title; and he turned his arms against the kingdom of Hungary, the
perpetual theatre of the Turkish victories and defeats.
Sigismond, the Hungarian king, was the son and brother of the
emperors of the West: his cause was that of Europe and the
church; and, on the report of his danger, the bravest knights of
France and Germany were eager to march under his standard and
that of the cross. In the battle of Nicopolis, Bajazet defeated a
confederate army of a hundred thousand Christians, who had
proudly boasted, that if the sky should fall, they could uphold
it on their lances. The far greater part were slain or driven
into the Danube; and Sigismond, escaping to Constantinople by the
river and the Black Sea, returned after a long circuit to his
exhausted kingdom. 60 In the pride of victory, Bajazet threatened
that he would besiege Buda; that he would subdue the adjacent
countries of Germany and Italy, and that he would feed his horse
with a bushel of oats on the altar of St. Peter at Rome. His
progress was checked, not by the miraculous interposition of the
apostle, not by a crusade of the Christian powers, but by a long
and painful fit of the gout. The disorders of the moral, are
sometimes corrected by those of the physical, world; and an
acrimonious humor falling on a single fibre of one man, may
prevent or suspend the misery of nations.
56 (return) [ The reign of Bajazet I., or Ilderim Bayazid, is
contained in Cantemir, (p. 46,) the iid book of Chalcondyles, and
the Annales Turcici. The surname of Ilderim, or lightning, is an
example, that the conquerors and poets of every age have _felt_
the truth of a system which derives the sublime from the
principle of terror.]
57 (return) [ Cantemir, who celebrates the victories of the great
Stephen over the Turks, (p. 47,) had composed the ancient and
modern state of his principality of Moldavia, which has been long
promised, and is still unpublished.]
58 (return) [ Leunclav. Annal. Turcici, p. 318, 319. The venality
of the cadhis has long been an object of scandal and satire; and
if we distrust the observations of our travellers, we may consult
the feeling of the Turks themselves, (D’Herbelot, Bibliot.
Orientale, p. 216, 217, 229, 230.)]
59 (return) [ The fact, which is attested by the Arabic history
of Ben Schounah, a contemporary Syrian, (De Guignes Hist. des
Huns. tom. iv. p. 336.) destroys the testimony of Saad Effendi
and Cantemir, (p. 14, 15,) of the election of Othman to the
dignity of sultan.]
60 (return) [ See the Decades Rerum Hungaricarum (Dec. iii. l.
ii. p. 379) of Bonfinius, an Italian, who, in the xvth century,
was invited into Hungary to compose an eloquent history of that
kingdom. Yet, if it be extant and accessible, I should give the
preference to some homely chronicle of the time and country.]
Such is the general idea of the Hungarian war; but the disastrous
adventure of the French has procured us some memorials which
illustrate the victory and character of Bajazet. 61 The duke of
Burgundy, sovereign of Flanders, and uncle of Charles the Sixth,
yielded to the ardor of his son, John count of Nevers; and the
fearless youth was accompanied by four princes, his _cousins_,
and those of the French monarch. Their inexperience was guided by
the Sire de Coucy, one of the best and oldest captain of
Christendom; 62 but the constable, admiral, and marshal of France
63 commanded an army which did not exceed the number of a
thousand knights and squires. 631 These splendid names were the
source of presumption and the bane of discipline. So many might
aspire to command, that none were willing to obey; their national
spirit despised both their enemies and their allies; and in the
persuasion that Bajazet _would_ fly, or _must_ fall, they began
to compute how soon they should visit Constantinople and deliver
the holy sepulchre. When their scouts announced the approach of
the Turks, the gay and thoughtless youths were at table, already
heated with wine; they instantly clasped their armor, mounted
their horses, rode full speed to the vanguard, and resented as an
affront the advice of Sigismond, which would have deprived them
of the right and honor of the foremost attack. The battle of
Nicopolis would not have been lost, if the French would have
obeyed the prudence of the Hungarians; but it might have been
gloriously won, had the Hungarians imitated the valor of the
French. They dispersed the first line, consisting of the troops
of Asia; forced a rampart of stakes, which had been planted
against the cavalry; broke, after a bloody conflict, the
Janizaries themselves; and were at length overwhelmed by the
numerous squadrons that issued from the woods, and charged on all
sides this handful of intrepid warriors. In the speed and secrecy
of his march, in the order and evolutions of the battle, his
enemies felt and admired the military talents of Bajazet. They
accuse his cruelty in the use of victory. After reserving the
count of Nevers, and four-and-twenty lords, 632 whose birth and
riches were attested by his Latin interpreters, the remainder of
the French captives, who had survived the slaughter of the day,
were led before his throne; and, as they refused to abjure their
faith, were successively beheaded in his presence. The sultan was
exasperated by the loss of his bravest Janizaries; and if it be
true, that, on the eve of the engagement, the French had
massacred their Turkish prisoners, 64 they might impute to
themselves the consequences of a just retaliation. 641 A knight,
whose life had been spared, was permitted to return to Paris,
that he might relate the deplorable tale, and solicit the ransom
of the noble captives. In the mean while, the count of Nevers,
with the princes and barons of France, were dragged along in the
marches of the Turkish camp, exposed as a grateful trophy to the
Moslems of Europe and Asia, and strictly confined at Boursa, as
often as Bajazet resided in his capital. The sultan was pressed
each day to expiate with their blood the blood of his martyrs;
but he had pronounced that they should live, and either for mercy
or destruction his word was irrevocable. He was assured of their
value and importance by the return of the messenger, and the
gifts and intercessions of the kings of France and of Cyprus.
Lusignan presented him with a gold saltcellar of curious
workmanship, and of the price of ten thousand ducats; and Charles
the Sixth despatched by the way of Hungary a cast of Norwegian
hawks, and six horse-loads of scarlet cloth, of fine linen of
Rheims, and of Arras tapestry, representing the battles of the
great Alexander. After much delay, the effect of distance rather
than of art, Bajazet agreed to accept a ransom of two hundred
thousand ducats for the count of Nevers and the surviving princes
and barons: the marshal Boucicault, a famous warrior, was of the
number of the fortunate; but the admiral of France had been slain
in battle; and the constable, with the Sire de Coucy, died in the
prison of Boursa. This heavy demand, which was doubled by
incidental costs, fell chiefly on the duke of Burgundy, or rather
on his Flemish subjects, who were bound by the feudal laws to
contribute for the knighthood and captivity of the eldest son of
their lord. For the faithful discharge of the debt, some
merchants of Genoa gave security to the amount of five times the
sum; a lesson to those warlike times, that commerce and credit
are the links of the society of nations. It had been stipulated
in the treaty, that the French captives should swear never to
bear arms against the person of their conqueror; but the
ungenerous restraint was abolished by Bajazet himself. “I
despise,” said he to the heir of Burgundy, “thy oaths and thy
arms. Thou art young, and mayest be ambitious of effacing the
disgrace or misfortune of thy first chivalry. Assemble thy
powers, proclaim thy design, and be assured that Bajazet will
rejoice to meet thee a second time in a field of battle.” Before
their departure, they were indulged in the freedom and
hospitality of the court of Boursa. The French princes admired
the magnificence of the Ottoman, whose hunting and hawking
equipage was composed of seven thousand huntsmen and seven
thousand falconers. 65 In their presence, and at his command, the
belly of one of his chamberlains was cut open, on a complaint
against him for drinking the goat’s milk of a poor woman. The
strangers were astonished by this act of justice; but it was the
justice of a sultan who disdains to balance the weight of
evidence, or to measure the degrees of guilt.
61 (return) [ I should not complain of the labor of this work, if
my materials were always derived from such books as the chronicle
of honest Froissard, (vol. iv. c. 67, 72, 74, 79—83, 85, 87, 89,)
who read little, inquired much, and believed all. The original
Mémoires of the Maréchal de Boucicault (Partie i. c. 22—28) add
some facts, but they are dry and deficient, if compared with the
pleasant garrulity of Froissard.]
62 (return) [ An accurate Memoir on the Life of Enguerrand VII.,
Sire de Coucy, has been given by the Baron de Zurlauben, (Hist.
de l’Académie des Inscriptions, tom. xxv.) His rank and
possessions were equally considerable in France and England; and,
in 1375, he led an army of adventurers into Switzerland, to
recover a large patrimony which he claimed in right of his
grandmother, the daughter of the emperor Albert I. of Austria,
(Sinner, Voyage dans la Suisse Occidentale, tom. i. p. 118—124.)]
63 (return) [ That military office, so respectable at present,
was still more conspicuous when it was divided between two
persons, (Daniel, Hist. de la Milice Françoise, tom. ii. p. 5.)
One of these, the marshal of the crusade, was the famous
Boucicault, who afterwards defended Constantinople, governed
Genoa, invaded the coast of Asia, and died in the field of
Azincour.]
631 (return) [ Daru, Hist. de Venice, vol. ii. p. 104, makes the
whole French army amount to 10,000 men, of whom 1000 were
knights. The curious volume of Schiltberger, a German of Munich,
who was taken prisoner in the battle, (edit. Munich, 1813,) and
which V. Hammer receives as authentic, gives the whole number at
6000. See Schiltberger. Reise in dem Orient. and V. Hammer, note,
p. 610.—M.]
632 (return) [ According to Schiltberger there were only twelve
French lords granted to the prayer of the “duke of Burgundy,” and
“Herr Stephan Synther, and Johann von Bodem.” Schiltberger, p.
13.—M.]
64 (return) [ For this odious fact, the Abbé de Vertot quotes the
Hist. Anonyme de St. Denys, l. xvi. c. 10, 11. (Ordre de Malthe,
tom. ii. p. 310.)]
641 (return) [ See Schiltberger’s very graphic account of the
massacre. He was led out to be slaughtered in cold blood with the
rest f the Christian prisoners, amounting to 10,000. He was
spared at the intercession of the son of Bajazet, with a few
others, on account of their extreme youth. No one under 20 years
of age was put to death. The “duke of Burgundy” was obliged to be
a spectator of this butchery which lasted from early in the
morning till four o’clock, P. M. It ceased only at the
supplication of the leaders of Bajazet’s army. Schiltberger, p.
14.—M.]
65 (return) [ Sherefeddin Ali (Hist. de Timour Bec, l. v. c. 13)
allows Bajazet a round number of 12,000 officers and servants of
the chase. A part of his spoils was afterwards displayed in a
hunting-match of Timour, l. hounds with satin housings; 2.
leopards with collars set with jewels; 3. Grecian greyhounds; and
4, dogs from Europe, as strong as African lions, (idem, l. vi. c.
15.) Bajazet was particularly fond of flying his hawks at cranes,
(Chalcondyles, l. ii. p. 85.)]
After his enfranchisement from an oppressive guardian, John
Palæologus remained thirty-six years, the helpless, and, as it
should seem, the careless spectator of the public ruin. 66 Love,
or rather lust, was his only vigorous passion; and in the
embraces of the wives and virgins of the city, the Turkish slave
forgot the dishonor of the emperor of the _Romans_ Andronicus,
his eldest son, had formed, at Adrianople, an intimate and guilty
friendship with Sauzes, the son of Amurath; and the two youths
conspired against the authority and lives of their parents. The
presence of Amurath in Europe soon discovered and dissipated
their rash counsels; and, after depriving Sauzes of his sight,
the Ottoman threatened his vassal with the treatment of an
accomplice and an enemy, unless he inflicted a similar punishment
on his own son. Palæologus trembled and obeyed; and a cruel
precaution involved in the same sentence the childhood and
innocence of John, the son of the criminal. But the operation was
so mildly, or so unskilfully, performed, that the one retained
the sight of an eye, and the other was afflicted only with the
infirmity of squinting. Thus excluded from the succession, the
two princes were confined in the tower of Anema; and the piety of
Manuel, the second son of the reigning monarch, was rewarded with
the gift of the Imperial crown. But at the end of two years, the
turbulence of the Latins and the levity of the Greeks, produced a
revolution; 661 and the two emperors were buried in the tower
from whence the two prisoners were exalted to the throne. Another
period of two years afforded Palæologus and Manuel the means of
escape: it was contrived by the magic or subtlety of a monk, who
was alternately named the angel or the devil: they fled to
Scutari; their adherents armed in their cause; and the two
Byzantine factions displayed the ambition and animosity with
which Cæsar and Pompey had disputed the empire of the world. The
Roman world was now contracted to a corner of Thrace, between the
Propontis and the Black Sea, about fifty miles in length and
thirty in breadth; a space of ground not more extensive than the
lesser principalities of Germany or Italy, if the remains of
Constantinople had not still represented the wealth and
populousness of a kingdom. To restore the public peace, it was
found necessary to divide this fragment of the empire; and while
Palæologus and Manuel were left in possession of the capital,
almost all that lay without the walls was ceded to the blind
princes, who fixed their residence at Rhodosto and Selybria. In
the tranquil slumber of royalty, the passions of John Palæologus
survived his reason and his strength: he deprived his favorite
and heir of a blooming princess of Trebizond; and while the
feeble emperor labored to consummate his nuptials, Manuel, with a
hundred of the noblest Greeks, was sent on a peremptory summons
to the Ottoman _porte_. They served with honor in the wars of
Bajazet; but a plan of fortifying Constantinople excited his
jealousy: he threatened their lives; the new works were instantly
demolished; and we shall bestow a praise, perhaps above the merit
of Palæologus, if we impute this last humiliation as the cause of
his death.
66 (return) [ For the reigns of John Palæologus and his son
Manuel, from 1354 to 1402, see Ducas, c. 9—15, Phranza, l. i. c.
16—21, and the ist and iid books of Chalcondyles, whose proper
subject is drowned in a sea of episode.]
661 (return) [ According to Von Hammer it was the power of
Bajazet, vol. i. p. 218.]
The earliest intelligence of that event was communicated to
Manuel, who escaped with speed and secrecy from the palace of
Boursa to the Byzantine throne. Bajazet affected a proud
indifference at the loss of this valuable pledge; and while he
pursued his conquests in Europe and Asia, he left the emperor to
struggle with his blind cousin John of Selybria, who, in eight
years of civil war, asserted his right of primogeniture. At
length, the ambition of the victorious sultan pointed to the
conquest of Constantinople; but he listened to the advice of his
vizier, who represented that such an enterprise might unite the
powers of Christendom in a second and more formidable crusade.
His epistle to the emperor was conceived in these words: “By the
divine clemency, our invincible cimeter has reduced to our
obedience almost all Asia, with many and large countries in
Europe, excepting only the city of Constantinople; for beyond the
walls thou hast nothing left. Resign that city; stipulate thy
reward; or tremble, for thyself and thy unhappy people, at the
consequences of a rash refusal.” But his ambassadors were
instructed to soften their tone, and to propose a treaty, which
was subscribed with submission and gratitude. A truce of ten
years was purchased by an annual tribute of thirty thousand
crowns of gold; the Greeks deplored the public toleration of the
law of Mahomet, and Bajazet enjoyed the glory of establishing a
Turkish cadhi, and founding a royal mosque in the metropolis of
the Eastern church. 67 Yet this truce was soon violated by the
restless sultan: in the cause of the prince of Selybria, the
lawful emperor, an army of Ottomans again threatened
Constantinople; and the distress of Manuel implored the
protection of the king of France. His plaintive embassy obtained
much pity and some relief; and the conduct of the succor was
intrusted to the marshal Boucicault, 68 whose religious chivalry
was inflamed by the desire of revenging his captivity on the
infidels. He sailed with four ships of war, from Aiguesmortes to
the Hellespont; forced the passage, which was guarded by
seventeen Turkish galleys; landed at Constantinople a supply of
six hundred men-at-arms and sixteen hundred archers; and reviewed
them in the adjacent plain, without condescending to number or
array the multitude of Greeks. By his presence, the blockade was
raised both by sea and land; the flying squadrons of Bajazet were
driven to a more respectful distance; and several castles in
Europe and Asia were stormed by the emperor and the marshal, who
fought with equal valor by each other’s side. But the Ottomans
soon returned with an increase of numbers; and the intrepid
Boucicault, after a year’s struggle, resolved to evacuate a
country which could no longer afford either pay or provisions for
his soldiers. The marshal offered to conduct Manuel to the French
court, where he might solicit in person a supply of men and
money; and advised, in the mean while, that, to extinguish all
domestic discord, he should leave his blind competitor on the
throne. The proposal was embraced: the prince of Selybria was
introduced to the capital; and such was the public misery, that
the lot of the exile seemed more fortunate than that of the
sovereign. Instead of applauding the success of his vassal, the
Turkish sultan claimed the city as his own; and on the refusal of
the emperor John, Constantinople was more closely pressed by the
calamities of war and famine. Against such an enemy prayers and
resistance were alike unavailing; and the savage would have
devoured his prey, if, in the fatal moment, he had not been
overthrown by another savage stronger than himself. By the
victory of Timour or Tamerlane, the fall of Constantinople was
delayed about fifty years; and this important, though accidental,
service may justly introduce the life and character of the Mogul
conqueror.
67 (return) [ Cantemir, p. 50—53. Of the Greeks, Ducas alone (c.
13, 15) acknowledges the Turkish cadhi at Constantinople. Yet
even Ducas dissembles the mosque.]
68 (return) [ Mémoires du bon Messire Jean le Maingre, dit
_Boucicault_, Maréchal de France, partie ire c. 30, 35.]