Chapter LXI: Partition Of The Empire By The French And

Venetians.—Part II.

Proud of his victory and his royal prize, the Bulgarian advanced

to relieve Adrianople and achieve the destruction of the Latins.

They must inevitably have been destroyed, if the marshal of

Romania had not displayed a cool courage and consummate skill;

uncommon in all ages, but most uncommon in those times, when war

was a passion, rather than a science. His grief and fears were

poured into the firm and faithful bosom of the doge; but in the

camp he diffused an assurance of safety, which could only be

realized by the general belief. All day he maintained his

perilous station between the city and the Barbarians:

Villehardouin decamped in silence at the dead of night; and his

masterly retreat of three days would have deserved the praise of

Xenophon and the ten thousand. In the rear, the marshal supported

the weight of the pursuit; in the front, he moderated the

impatience of the fugitives; and wherever the Comans approached,

they were repelled by a line of impenetrable spears. On the third

day, the weary troops beheld the sea, the solitary town of

Rodosta, 27 and their friends, who had landed from the Asiatic

shore. They embraced, they wept; but they united their arms and

counsels; and in his brother’s absence, Count Henry assumed the

regency of the empire, at once in a state of childhood and

caducity. 28 If the Comans withdrew from the summer heats, seven

thousand Latins, in the hour of danger, deserted Constantinople,

their brethren, and their vows. Some partial success was

overbalanced by the loss of one hundred and twenty knights in the

field of Rusium; and of the Imperial domain, no more was left

than the capital, with two or three adjacent fortresses on the

shores of Europe and Asia. The king of Bulgaria was resistless

and inexorable; and Calo-John respectfully eluded the demands of

the pope, who conjured his new proselyte to restore peace and the

emperor to the afflicted Latins. The deliverance of Baldwin was

no longer, he said, in the power of man: that prince had died in

prison; and the manner of his death is variously related by

ignorance and credulity. The lovers of a tragic legend will be

pleased to hear, that the royal captive was tempted by the

amorous queen of the Bulgarians; that his chaste refusal exposed

him to the falsehood of a woman and the jealousy of a savage;

that his hands and feet were severed from his body; that his

bleeding trunk was cast among the carcasses of dogs and horses;

and that he breathed three days, before he was devoured by the

birds of prey. 29 About twenty years afterwards, in a wood of the

Netherlands, a hermit announced himself as the true Baldwin, the

emperor of Constantinople, and lawful sovereign of Flanders. He

related the wonders of his escape, his adventures, and his

penance, among a people prone to believe and to rebel; and, in

the first transport, Flanders acknowledged her long-lost

sovereign. A short examination before the French court detected

the impostor, who was punished with an ignominious death; but the

Flemings still adhered to the pleasing error; and the countess

Jane is accused by the gravest historians of sacrificing to her

ambition the life of an unfortunate father. 30

27 (return) [ The truth of geography, and the original text of

Villehardouin, (No. 194,) place Rodosto three days’ journey

(trois jornées) from Adrianople: but Vigenere, in his version,

has most absurdly substituted _trois heures_; and this error,

which is not corrected by Ducange has entrapped several moderns,

whose names I shall spare.]

28 (return) [ The reign and end of Baldwin are related by

Villehardouin and Nicetas, (p. 386—416;) and their omissions are

supplied by Ducange in his Observations, and to the end of his

first book.]

29 (return) [ After brushing away all doubtful and improbable

circumstances, we may prove the death of Baldwin, 1. By the firm

belief of the French barons, (Villehardouin, No. 230.) 2. By the

declaration of Calo-John himself, who excuses his not releasing

the captive emperor, quia debitum carnis exsolverat cum carcere

teneretur, (Gesta Innocent III. c. 109.) * Note: Compare Von

Raumer. Geschichte der Hohenstaufen, vol. ii. p. 237. Petitot, in

his preface to Villehardouin in the Collection des Mémoires,

relatifs a l’Histoire de France, tom. i. p. 85, expresses his

belief in the first part of the “tragic legend.”—M.]

30 (return) [ See the story of this impostor from the French and

Flemish writers in Ducange, Hist. de C. P. iii. 9; and the

ridiculous fables that were believed by the monks of St. Alban’s,

in Matthew Paris, Hist. Major, p. 271, 272.]

In all civilized hostility, a treaty is established for the

exchange or ransom of prisoners; and if their captivity be

prolonged, their condition is known, and they are treated

according to their rank with humanity or honor. But the savage

Bulgarian was a stranger to the laws of war: his prisons were

involved in darkness and silence; and above a year elapsed before

the Latins could be assured of the death of Baldwin, before his

brother, the regent Henry, would consent to assume the title of

emperor. His moderation was applauded by the Greeks as an act of

rare and inimitable virtue. Their light and perfidious ambition

was eager to seize or anticipate the moment of a vacancy, while a

law of succession, the guardian both of the prince and people,

was gradually defined and confirmed in the hereditary monarchies

of Europe. In the support of the Eastern empire, Henry was

gradually left without an associate, as the heroes of the crusade

retired from the world or from the war. The doge of Venice, the

venerable Dandolo, in the fulness of years and glory, sunk into

the grave. The marquis of Montferrat was slowly recalled from the

Peloponnesian war to the revenge of Baldwin and the defence of

Thessalonica. Some nice disputes of feudal homage and service

were reconciled in a personal interview between the emperor and

the king; they were firmly united by mutual esteem and the common

danger; and their alliance was sealed by the nuptials of Henry

with the daughter of the Italian prince. He soon deplored the

loss of his friend and father. At the persuasion of some faithful

Greeks, Boniface made a bold and successful inroad among the

hills of Rhodope: the Bulgarians fled on his approach; they

assembled to harass his retreat. On the intelligence that his

rear was attacked, without waiting for any defensive armor, he

leaped on horseback, couched his lance, and drove the enemies

before him; but in the rash pursuit he was pierced with a mortal

wound; and the head of the king of Thessalonica was presented to

Calo-John, who enjoyed the honors, without the merit, of victory.

It is here, at this melancholy event, that the pen or the voice

of Jeffrey of Villehardouin seems to drop or to expire; 31 and if

he still exercised his military office of marshal of Romania, his

subsequent exploits are buried in oblivion. 32 The character of

Henry was not unequal to his arduous situation: in the siege of

Constantinople, and beyond the Hellespont, he had deserved the

fame of a valiant knight and a skilful commander; and his courage

was tempered with a degree of prudence and mildness unknown to

his impetuous brother. In the double war against the Greeks of

Asia and the Bulgarians of Europe, he was ever the foremost on

shipboard or on horseback; and though he cautiously provided for

the success of his arms, the drooping Latins were often roused by

his example to save and to second their fearless emperor. But

such efforts, and some supplies of men and money from France,

were of less avail than the errors, the cruelty, and death, of

their most formidable adversary. When the despair of the Greek

subjects invited Calo-John as their deliverer, they hoped that he

would protect their liberty and adopt their laws: they were soon

taught to compare the degrees of national ferocity, and to

execrate the savage conqueror, who no longer dissembled his

intention of dispeopling Thrace, of demolishing the cities, and

of transplanting the inhabitants beyond the Danube. Many towns

and villages of Thrace were already evacuated: a heap of ruins

marked the place of Philippopolis, and a similar calamity was

expected at Demotica and Adrianople, by the first authors of the

revolt. They raised a cry of grief and repentance to the throne

of Henry; the emperor alone had the magnanimity to forgive and

trust them. No more than four hundred knights, with their

sergeants and archers, could be assembled under his banner; and

with this slender force he fought 321 and repulsed the Bulgarian,

who, besides his infantry, was at the head of forty thousand

horse. In this expedition, Henry felt the difference between a

hostile and a friendly country: the remaining cities were

preserved by his arms; and the savage, with shame and loss, was

compelled to relinquish his prey. The siege of Thessalonica was

the last of the evils which Calo-John inflicted or suffered: he

was stabbed in the night in his tent; and the general, perhaps

the assassin, who found him weltering in his blood, ascribed the

blow, with general applause, to the lance of St. Demetrius. 33

After several victories, the prudence of Henry concluded an

honorable peace with the successor of the tyrant, and with the

Greek princes of Nice and Epirus. If he ceded some doubtful

limits, an ample kingdom was reserved for himself and his

feudatories; and his reign, which lasted only ten years, afforded

a short interval of prosperity and peace. Far above the narrow

policy of Baldwin and Boniface, he freely intrusted to the Greeks

the most important offices of the state and army; and this

liberality of sentiment and practice was the more seasonable, as

the princes of Nice and Epirus had already learned to seduce and

employ the mercenary valor of the Latins. It was the aim of Henry

to unite and reward his deserving subjects, of every nation and

language; but he appeared less solicitous to accomplish the

impracticable union of the two churches. Pelagius, the pope’s

legate, who acted as the sovereign of Constantinople, had

interdicted the worship of the Greeks, and sternly imposed the

payment of tithes, the double procession of the Holy Ghost, and a

blind obedience to the Roman pontiff. As the weaker party, they

pleaded the duties of conscience, and implored the rights of

toleration: “Our bodies,” they said, “are Cæsar’s, but our souls

belong only to God.” The persecution was checked by the firmness

of the emperor: 34 and if we can believe that the same prince was

poisoned by the Greeks themselves, we must entertain a

contemptible idea of the sense and gratitude of mankind. His

valor was a vulgar attribute, which he shared with ten thousand

knights; but Henry possessed the superior courage to oppose, in a

superstitious age, the pride and avarice of the clergy. In the

cathedral of St. Sophia he presumed to place his throne on the

right hand of the patriarch; and this presumption excited the

sharpest censure of Pope Innocent the Third. By a salutary edict,

one of the first examples of the laws of mortmain, he prohibited

the alienation of fiefs: many of the Latins, desirous of

returning to Europe, resigned their estates to the church for a

spiritual or temporal reward; these holy lands were immediately

discharged from military service, and a colony of soldiers would

have been gradually transformed into a college of priests. 35

31 (return) [ Villehardouin, No. 257. I quote, with regret, this

lamentable conclusion, where we lose at once the original

history, and the rich illustrations of Ducange. The last pages

may derive some light from Henry’s two epistles to Innocent III.,

(Gesta, c. 106, 107.)]

32 (return) [ The marshal was alive in 1212, but he probably died

soon afterwards, without returning to France, (Ducange,

Observations sur Villehardouin, p. 238.) His fief of Messinople,

the gift of Boniface, was the ancient Maximianopolis, which

flourished in the time of Ammianus Marcellinus, among the cities

of Thrace, (No. 141.)]

321 (return) [ There was no battle. On the advance of the Latins,

John suddenly broke up his camp and retreated. The Latins

considered this unexpected deliverance almost a miracle. Le Beau

suggests the probability that the detection of the Comans, who

usually quitted the camp during the heats of summer, may have

caused the flight of the Bulgarians. Nicetas, c. 8 Villebardouin,

c. 225. Le Beau, vol. xvii. p. 242.—M.]

33 (return) [ The church of this patron of Thessalonica was

served by the canons of the holy sepulchre, and contained a

divine ointment which distilled daily and stupendous miracles,

(Ducange, Hist. de C. P. ii. 4.)]

34 (return) [ Acropolita (c. 17) observes the persecution of the

legate, and the toleration of Henry, ('Erh, * as he calls him)

kludwna katestorese. Note: Or rather 'ErrhV.—M.]

35 (return) [ See the reign of Henry, in Ducange, (Hist. de C. P.

l. i. c. 35—41, l. ii. c. 1—22,) who is much indebted to the

Epistles of the Popes. Le Beau (Hist. du Bas Empire, tom. xxi. p.

120—122) has found, perhaps in Doutreman, some laws of Henry,

which determined the service of fiefs, and the prerogatives of

the emperor.]

The virtuous Henry died at Thessalonica, in the defence of that

kingdom, and of an infant, the son of his friend Boniface. In the

two first emperors of Constantinople the male line of the counts

of Flanders was extinct. But their sister Yolande was the wife of

a French prince, the mother of a numerous progeny; and one of her

daughters had married Andrew king of Hungary, a brave and pious

champion of the cross. By seating him on the Byzantine throne,

the barons of Romania would have acquired the forces of a

neighboring and warlike kingdom; but the prudent Andrew revered

the laws of succession; and the princess Yolande, with her

husband Peter of Courtenay, count of Auxerre, was invited by the

Latins to assume the empire of the East. The royal birth of his

father, the noble origin of his mother, recommended to the barons

of France the first cousin of their king. His reputation was

fair, his possessions were ample, and in the bloody crusade

against the Albigeois, the soldiers and the priests had been

abundantly satisfied of his zeal and valor. Vanity might applaud

the elevation of a French emperor of Constantinople; but prudence

must pity, rather than envy, his treacherous and imaginary

greatness. To assert and adorn his title, he was reduced to sell

or mortgage the best of his patrimony. By these expedients, the

liberality of his royal kinsman Philip Augustus, and the national

spirit of chivalry, he was enabled to pass the Alps at the head

of one hundred and forty knights, and five thousand five hundred

sergeants and archers. After some hesitation, Pope Honorius the

Third was persuaded to crown the successor of Constantine: but he

performed the ceremony in a church without the walls, lest he

should seem to imply or to bestow any right of sovereignty over

the ancient capital of the empire. The Venetians had engaged to

transport Peter and his forces beyond the Adriatic, and the

empress, with her four children, to the Byzantine palace; but

they required, as the price of their service, that he should

recover Durazzo from the despot of Epirus. Michael Angelus, or

Comnenus, the first of his dynasty, had bequeathed the succession

of his power and ambition to Theodore, his legitimate brother,

who already threatened and invaded the establishments of the

Latins. After discharging his debt by a fruitless assault, the

emperor raised the siege to prosecute a long and perilous journey

over land from Durazzo to Thessalonica. He was soon lost in the

mountains of Epirus: the passes were fortified; his provisions

exhausted; he was delayed and deceived by a treacherous

negotiation; and, after Peter of Courtenay and the Roman legate

had been arrested in a banquet, the French troops, without

leaders or hopes, were eager to exchange their arms for the

delusive promise of mercy and bread. The Vatican thundered; and

the impious Theodore was threatened with the vengeance of earth

and heaven; but the captive emperor and his soldiers were

forgotten, and the reproaches of the pope are confined to the

imprisonment of his legate. No sooner was he satisfied by the

deliverance of the priests and a promise of spiritual obedience,

than he pardoned and protected the despot of Epirus. His

peremptory commands suspended the ardor of the Venetians and the

king of Hungary; and it was only by a natural or untimely death

36 that Peter of Courtenay was released from his hopeless

captivity. 37

36 (return) [ Acropolita (c. 14) affirms, that Peter of Courtenay

died by the sword, (ergon macairaV genesqai;) but from his dark

expressions, I should conclude a previous captivity, wV pantaV

ardhn desmwtaV poihsai sun pasi skeuesi. * The Chronicle of

Auxerre delays the emperor’s death till the year 1219; and

Auxerre is in the neighborhood of Courtenay. Note: Whatever may

have been the fact, this can hardly be made out from the

expressions of Acropolita.—M.]

37 (return) [ See the reign and death of Peter of Courtenay, in

Ducange, (Hist. de C. P. l. ii. c. 22—28,) who feebly strives to

excuse the neglect of the emperor by Honorius III.]

The long ignorance of his fate, and the presence of the lawful

sovereign, of Yolande, his wife or widow, delayed the

proclamation of a new emperor. Before her death, and in the midst

of her grief, she was delivered of a son, who was named Baldwin,

the last and most unfortunate of the Latin princes of

Constantinople. His birth endeared him to the barons of Romania;

but his childhood would have prolonged the troubles of a

minority, and his claims were superseded by the elder claims of

his brethren. The first of these, Philip of Courtenay, who

derived from his mother the inheritance of Namur, had the wisdom

to prefer the substance of a marquisate to the shadow of an

empire; and on his refusal, Robert, the second of the sons of

Peter and Yolande, was called to the throne of Constantinople.

Warned by his father’s mischance, he pursued his slow and secure

journey through Germany and along the Danube: a passage was

opened by his sister’s marriage with the king of Hungary; and the

emperor Robert was crowned by the patriarch in the cathedral of

St. Sophia. But his reign was an æra of calamity and disgrace;

and the colony, as it was styled, of New France yielded on all

sides to the Greeks of Nice and Epirus. After a victory, which he

owed to his perfidy rather than his courage, Theodore Angelus

entered the kingdom of Thessalonica, expelled the feeble

Demetrius, the son of the marquis Boniface, erected his standard

on the walls of Adrianople; and added, by his vanity, a third or

a fourth name to the list of rival emperors. The relics of the

Asiatic province were swept away by John Vataces, the son-in-law

and successor of Theodore Lascaris, and who, in a triumphant

reign of thirty-three years, displayed the virtues both of peace

and war. Under his discipline, the swords of the French

mercenaries were the most effectual instruments of his conquests,

and their desertion from the service of their country was at once

a symptom and a cause of the rising ascendant of the Greeks. By

the construction of a fleet, he obtained the command of the

Hellespont, reduced the islands of Lesbos and Rhodes, attacked

the Venetians of Candia, and intercepted the rare and

parsimonious succors of the West. Once, and once only, the Latin

emperor sent an army against Vataces; and in the defeat of that

army, the veteran knights, the last of the original conquerors,

were left on the field of battle. But the success of a foreign

enemy was less painful to the pusillanimous Robert than the

insolence of his Latin subjects, who confounded the weakness of

the emperor and of the empire. His personal misfortunes will

prove the anarchy of the government and the ferociousness of the

times. The amorous youth had neglected his Greek bride, the

daughter of Vataces, to introduce into the palace a beautiful

maid, of a private, though noble family of Artois; and her mother

had been tempted by the lustre of the purple to forfeit her

engagements with a gentleman of Burgundy. His love was converted

into rage; he assembled his friends, forced the palace gates,

threw the mother into the sea, and inhumanly cut off the nose and

lips of the wife or concubine of the emperor. Instead of

punishing the offender, the barons avowed and applauded the

savage deed, 38 which, as a prince and as a man, it was

impossible that Robert should forgive. He escaped from the guilty

city to implore the justice or compassion of the pope: the

emperor was coolly exhorted to return to his station; before he

could obey, he sunk under the weight of grief, shame, and

impotent resentment. 39

38 (return) [ Marinus Sanutus (Secreta Fidelium Crucis, l. ii. p.

4, c. 18, p. 73) is so much delighted with this bloody deed, that

he has transcribed it in his margin as a bonum exemplum. Yet he

acknowledges the damsel for the lawful wife of Robert.]

39 (return) [ See the reign of Robert, in Ducange, (Hist. de C.

P. l. ii. c.—12.)]

It was only in the age of chivalry, that valor could ascend from

a private station to the thrones of Jerusalem and Constantinople.

The titular kingdom of Jerusalem had devolved to Mary, the

daughter of Isabella and Conrad of Montferrat, and the

granddaughter of Almeric or Amaury. She was given to John of

Brienne, of a noble family in Champagne, by the public voice, and

the judgment of Philip Augustus, who named him as the most worthy

champion of the Holy Land. 40 In the fifth crusade, he led a

hundred thousand Latins to the conquest of Egypt: by him the

siege of Damietta was achieved; and the subsequent failure was

justly ascribed to the pride and avarice of the legate. After the

marriage of his daughter with Frederic the Second, 41 he was

provoked by the emperor’s ingratitude to accept the command of

the army of the church; and though advanced in life, and

despoiled of royalty, the sword and spirit of John of Brienne

were still ready for the service of Christendom. In the seven

years of his brother’s reign, Baldwin of Courtenay had not

emerged from a state of childhood, and the barons of Romania felt

the strong necessity of placing the sceptre in the hands of a man

and a hero. The veteran king of Jerusalem might have disdained

the name and office of regent; they agreed to invest him for his

life with the title and prerogatives of emperor, on the sole

condition that Baldwin should marry his second daughter, and

succeed at a mature age to the throne of Constantinople. The

expectation, both of the Greeks and Latins, was kindled by the

renown, the choice, and the presence of John of Brienne; and they

admired his martial aspect, his green and vigorous age of more

than fourscore years, and his size and stature, which surpassed

the common measure of mankind. 42 But avarice, and the love of

ease, appear to have chilled the ardor of enterprise: 421 his

troops were disbanded, and two years rolled away without action

or honor, till he was awakened by the dangerous alliance of

Vataces emperor of Nice, and of Azan king of Bulgaria. They

besieged Constantinople by sea and land, with an army of one

hundred thousand men, and a fleet of three hundred ships of war;

while the entire force of the Latin emperor was reduced to one

hundred and sixty knights, and a small addition of sergeants and

archers. I tremble to relate, that instead of defending the city,

the hero made a sally at the head of his cavalry; and that of

forty-eight squadrons of the enemy, no more than three escaped

from the edge of his invincible sword. Fired by his example, the

infantry and the citizens boarded the vessels that anchored close

to the walls; and twenty-five were dragged in triumph into the

harbor of Constantinople. At the summons of the emperor, the

vassals and allies armed in her defence; broke through every

obstacle that opposed their passage; and, in the succeeding year,

obtained a second victory over the same enemies. By the rude

poets of the age, John of Brienne is compared to Hector, Roland,

and Judas Machabæus: 43 but their credit, and his glory, receive

some abatement from the silence of the Greeks. The empire was

soon deprived of the last of her champions; and the dying monarch

was ambitious to enter paradise in the habit of a Franciscan

friar. 44

40 (return) [ Rex igitur Franciæ, deliberatione habitâ, respondit

nuntiis, se daturum hominem Syriæ partibus aptum; in armis probum

(_preux_) in bellis securum, in agendis providum, Johannem

comitem Brennensem. Sanut. Secret. Fidelium, l. iii. p. xi. c. 4,

p. 205 Matthew Paris, p. 159.]

41 (return) [ Giannone (Istoria Civile, tom. ii. l. xvi. p.

380—385) discusses the marriage of Frederic II. with the daughter

of John of Brienne, and the double union of the crowns of Naples

and Jerusalem.]

42 (return) [ Acropolita, c. 27. The historian was at that time a

boy, and educated at Constantinople. In 1233, when he was eleven

years old, his father broke the Latin chain, left a splendid

fortune, and escaped to the Greek court of Nice, where his son

was raised to the highest honors.]

421 (return) [ John de Brienne, elected emperor 1229, wasted two

years in preparations, and did not arrive at Constantinople till

1231. Two years more glided away in inglorious inaction; he then

made some ineffective warlike expeditions. Constantinople was not

besieged till 1234.—M.]

43 (return) [ Philip Mouskes, bishop of Tournay, (A.D.

1274—1282,) has composed a poem, or rather string of verses, in

bad old Flemish French, on the Latin emperors of Constantinople,

which Ducange has published at the end of Villehardouin; see p.

38, for the prowess of John of Brienne.

N’Aie, Ector, Roll’ ne Ogiers Ne Judas Machabeus li

fiers Tant ne fit d’armes en estors Com fist li Rois

Jehans cel jors Et il defors et il dedans La paru sa

force et ses sens Et li hardiment qu’il avoit.]

44 (return) [ See the reign of John de Brienne, in Ducange, Hist.

de C. P. l. ii. c. 13—26.]

In the double victory of John of Brienne, I cannot discover the

name or exploits of his pupil Baldwin, who had attained the age

of military service, and who succeeded to the imperial dignity on

the decease of his adoptive father. 45 The royal youth was

employed on a commission more suitable to his temper; he was sent

to visit the Western courts, of the pope more especially, and of

the king of France; to excite their pity by the view of his

innocence and distress; and to obtain some supplies of men or

money for the relief of the sinking empire. He thrice repeated

these mendicant visits, in which he seemed to prolong his stay

and postpone his return; of the five-and-twenty years of his

reign, a greater number were spent abroad than at home; and in no

place did the emperor deem himself less free and secure than in

his native country and his capital. On some public occasions, his

vanity might be soothed by the title of Augustus, and by the

honors of the purple; and at the general council of Lyons, when

Frederic the Second was excommunicated and deposed, his Oriental

colleague was enthroned on the right hand of the pope. But how

often was the exile, the vagrant, the Imperial beggar, humbled

with scorn, insulted with pity, and degraded in his own eyes and

those of the nations! In his first visit to England, he was

stopped at Dover by a severe reprimand, that he should presume,

without leave, to enter an independent kingdom. After some delay,

Baldwin, however, was permitted to pursue his journey, was

entertained with cold civility, and thankfully departed with a

present of seven hundred marks. 46 From the avarice of Rome he

could only obtain the proclamation of a crusade, and a treasure

of indulgences; a coin whose currency was depreciated by too

frequent and indiscriminate abuse. His birth and misfortunes

recommended him to the generosity of his cousin Louis the Ninth;

but the martial zeal of the saint was diverted from

Constantinople to Egypt and Palestine; and the public and private

poverty of Baldwin was alleviated, for a moment, by the

alienation of the marquisate of Namur and the lordship of

Courtenay, the last remains of his inheritance. 47 By such

shameful or ruinous expedients, he once more returned to Romania,

with an army of thirty thousand soldiers, whose numbers were

doubled in the apprehension of the Greeks. His first despatches

to France and England announced his victories and his hopes: he

had reduced the country round the capital to the distance of

three days’ journey; and if he succeeded against an important,

though nameless, city, (most probably Chiorli,) the frontier

would be safe and the passage accessible. But these expectations

(if Baldwin was sincere) quickly vanished like a dream: the

troops and treasures of France melted away in his unskilful

hands; and the throne of the Latin emperor was protected by a

dishonorable alliance with the Turks and Comans. To secure the

former, he consented to bestow his niece on the unbelieving

sultan of Cogni; to please the latter, he complied with their

Pagan rites; a dog was sacrificed between the two armies; and the

contracting parties tasted each other’s blood, as a pledge of

their fidelity. 48 In the palace, or prison, of Constantinople,

the successor of Augustus demolished the vacant houses for winter

fuel, and stripped the lead from the churches for the daily

expense of his family. Some usurious loans were dealt with a

scanty hand by the merchants of Italy; and Philip, his son and

heir, was pawned at Venice as the security for a debt. 49 Thirst,

hunger, and nakedness, are positive evils: but wealth is

relative; and a prince who would be rich in a private station,

may be exposed by the increase of his wants to all the anxiety

and bitterness of poverty.

45 (return) [ See the reign of Baldwin II. till his expulsion

from Constantinople, in Ducange, Hist. de C. P. l. iv. c. 1—34,

the end l. v. c. 1—33.]

46 (return) [ Matthew Paris relates the two visits of Baldwin II.

to the English court, p. 396, 637; his return to Greece armatâ

manû, p. 407 his letters of his nomen formidabile, &c., p. 481,

(a passage which has escaped Ducange;) his expulsion, p. 850.]

47 (return) [ Louis IX. disapproved and stopped the alienation of

Courtenay (Ducange, l. iv. c. 23.) It is now annexed to the royal

demesne but granted for a term (_engagé_) to the family of

Boulainvilliers. Courtenay, in the election of Nemours in the

Isle de France, is a town of 900 inhabitants, with the remains of

a castle, (Mélanges tirés d’une Grande Bibliothèque, tom. xlv. p.

74—77.)]

48 (return) [ Joinville, p. 104, edit. du Louvre. A Coman prince,

who died without baptism, was buried at the gates of

Constantinople with a live retinue of slaves and horses.]

49 (return) [ Sanut. Secret. Fidel. Crucis, l. ii. p. iv. c. 18,

p. 73.]

History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 6(#736) · 第 2 / 19 章