I at once wrote back to remove their misapprehension:--

"DEAR SIRS,--My fire was not what you would call an outbreak. It was

essentially a quiet affair, attended by neither Fire Brigade nor Salvage

Corps, but just the family (like being married at a registry-office, don't

you think?). My khaki slacks were the only articles injured. As I am now

going about without them, you will realise that no time should be lost in

settling the claim.

"Yours, etc.

"P.S. I nearly forgot--73856/RS/VP. There!"

A day or two later I received a request, pitched in an almost slanderously

sceptical tone, for more detailed information. I humoured them, and there

ensued a ding-dong correspondence, in which that wretched Ref. No. was

bandied backwards and forwards with nauseating reiteration, and of which

the following are the salient points:--

_They._ Kindly state what you estimate the total value of the contents of

your residence to be.

_Myself_ (_after a searching inquiry into present prices_). £1,500.

_They_ (_promptly_). We beg to point out that you are only insured for a

total sum of £750. In accordance with the terms of your policy you are only

entitled to recover such proportion of the value of the loss or damage as

the total insured bears towards the total value of the contents--_i.e._,

one-half.

_Myself._ Two guineas is exactly one-half of four guineas, the present cost

of slacks. Please see attached affidavit from tailor. (By a masterly stroke

I had actually induced the rascal to set out his iniquity in black and

white.)

At last, twenty days after the fire, when I had finally screwed myself up

to the point of going out to buy a pair of reach-me-downs, I was rewarded

by receiving a cheque for two guineas from the Insurance Company, "in full

settlement."

By the same post I received a letter from the Adjutant of my Depôt

informing me that I was not to return at the expiration of my leave, but by

War Office instructions (I will spare you the Ref. No.) was to proceed

instead to the Crystal Palace for immediate demobilization. (That, by the

way, is part of the game of being a volunteer for the Army of Occupation.)

It was Suzanne who brought the two letters into their proper correlation.

"You won't have to get a new pair of slacks now," she said.

"Bless my soul, no!" I exclaimed. "Then what ought I to do with this

cheque? Send it back?"

"Certainly not," cried Suzanne as she snatched it from my wavering hand.

"I've been wanting a new hat for some time."

* * * * *

[Illustration: ANOTHER COMBINE.

_Bystander._ "'OW YER GOIN', MATE?"

_Gutter Merchant._ "FINE! I'VE JUST AMALGAMATED WITH THE BUSINESS NEXT

DOOR."]

* * * * *

"FRENZIED FINANCE."

"The guardians want more money also. What the Treasury finan-local

taxations are _only the be_-lical taxations are _only the beginning_ of

the demand upon the citizen's pocket."--_Evening Paper._

* * * * *

"JUMPER CHAMPION.

"The reference to a young woman living at Esher, Surrey, who has

knitted 50 jumpers since August 20, which her friends claim to be a

world's record for an amateur, has resulted in a challenge.

"'Jumper,' who lives at Margate, writes: 'I find it quite easy to knit

in the dark and to read while knitting.'"--_Daily Paper_.

The Margate candidate will get our vote.

* * * * *

[Illustration: THE SERVANTS' BALL.

_Groom_ (_somewhat heated_). "CARE FOR A BREATHER, MY LADY?"]

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 158, 1920-01-14 · 第 21 / 36 题