CHAPTER XXI

HISTORIANS AND CHRONICLERS

Order of the Tannaim and Amoraim.--Achimaaz.--Abraham Ibn

Daud.--Josippon.--Historical Elegies, or Selichoth.--Memorial

Books.--Abraham Zacuto.--Elijah Kapsali.--Usque.--Ibn

Verga.--Joseph Cohen.--David Gans.--Gedaliah Ibn

Yachya.--Azariah di Rossi.

The historical books to be found in the Bible, the Apocrypha, and the

Hellenistic literature prove that the Hebrew genius was not unfitted for

the presentation of the facts of Jewish life. These older works, as well

as the writings of Josephus, also show a faculty for placing local

records in relation to the wider facts of general history. After the

dispersion of the Jews, however, the local was the only history in which

the Jews could bear a part. The Jews read history as a mere commentary

on their own fate, and hence they were unable to take the wide outlook

into the world required for the compilation of objective histories.

Thus, in their aim to find religious consolation for their sufferings in

the Middle Ages, the Jewish historians sought rather to trace the hand

of Providence than to analyze the human causes of the changes in the

affairs of mankind.

But in another sense the Jews were essentially gifted with the

historical spirit. The great men of Israel were not local heroes. Just

as Plutarch's Lives were part of the history of the world's politics, so

Jewish biographies of learned men were part of the history of the

world's civilization. With the "Order of the Tannaim and Amoraim"

(written about the year 1100) begins a series of such biographical

works, in which more appreciation of sober fact is displayed than might

have been expected from the period. In the same way the famous Letter of

Sherira Gaon on the compilation of the Rabbinical literature (980)

marked great progress in the critical examination of historical

problems. Later works did not maintain the same level.

In the Middle Ages, Jewish histories mostly took the form of uncritical

Chronicles, which included legends and traditions as well as assured

facts. Their interest and importance lie in the personal and communal

details with which they abound. Sometimes they are confessedly local.

This is the case with the "Chronicle of Achimaaz," written by him in

1055 in rhymed prose. In an entertaining style, he tells of the early

settlements of the Jews in Southern Italy, and throws much light on the

intercommunication between the scattered Jewish congregations of his

time. A larger canvas was filled by Abraham Ibn Daud, the physician and

philosopher who was born in Toledo in 1110, and met a martyr's end at

the age of seventy. His "Book of Tradition" (_Sefer ha-Kabbalah_),

written in 1161, was designed to present, in opposition to the Karaites,

the chain of Jewish tradition as a series of unbroken links from the

age of Moses to Ibn Baud's own times. Starting with the Creation, his

history ends with the anti-Karaitic crusade of Judah Ibn Ezra in Granada

(1150). Abraham Ibn Daud shows in this work considerable critical power,

but in his two other histories, one dealing with the history of Rome

from its foundation to the time of King Reccared in Spain, the other a

narrative of the history of the Jews during the Second Temple, the

author relied entirely on "Josippon." This was a medieval concoction

which long passed as the original Josephus. "Josippon" was a romance

rather than a history. Culled from all sources, from Strabo, Lucian, and

Eusebius, as well as from Josephus, this marvellous book exercised

strong influence on the Jewish imagination, and supplied an antidote to

the tribulations of the present by the consolations of the past and the

vivid hopes for the future.

For a long period Abraham Ibn Daud found no imitators. Jewish history

was written as part of the Jewish religion. Yet, incidentally, many

historical passages were introduced in the works of Jewish scholars and

travellers, and the liturgy was enriched by many beautiful historical

Elegies, which were a constant call to heroism and fidelity. These

Elegies, or _Selichoth_, were composed throughout the Middle Ages, and

their passionate outpourings of lamentation and trust give them a high

place in Jewish poetry. They are also important historically, and fully

justify the fine utterance with which Zunz introduces them, an utterance

which was translated by George Eliot as follows:

If there are ranks in suffering, Israel takes precedence of

all the nations--if the duration of sorrows and the patience

with which they are borne ennoble, the Jews are among the

aristocracy of every land--if a literature is called rich in

the possession of a few classic tragedies, what shall we say

to a National Tragedy lasting for fifteen hundred years, in

which the poets and the actors were also the heroes?

The story of the medieval section of this pathetic martyrdom is written

in the _Selichoth_ and in the more prosaic records known as "Memorial

Books" (in German, _Memorbücher_), which are lists of martyrs and brief

eulogies of their careers.

For the next formal history we must pass to Abraham Zacuto. In his old

age he employed some years of comparative quiet, after a stormy and

unhappy life, in writing a "Book of Genealogies" (_Yuchasin_). He had

been exiled from Spain in 1492, and twelve years later composed his

historical work in Tunis. Like Abraham Ibn Baud's book, it opens with

the Creation, and ends with the author's own day. Though Zacuto's work

is more celebrated than historical, it nevertheless had an important

share in reawaking the dormant interest of Jews in historical research.

Thus we find Elijah Kapsali of Candia writing, in 1523, a "History of

the Ottoman Empire," and Joseph Cohen, of Avignon, a "History of France

and Turkey," in 1554, in which he included an account of the rebellion

of Fiesco in Genoa, where the author was then residing.

The sixteenth century witnessed the production of several popular Jewish

histories. At that epoch the horizon of the world was extending under

new geographical and intellectual discoveries. Israel, on the other

hand, seemed to be sinking deeper and deeper into the slough of despond.

Some of the men who had themselves been the victims of persecution saw

that the only hope lay in rousing the historical consciousness of their

brethren. History became the consolation of the exiles from Spain who

found themselves pent up within the walls of the Ghettos, which were

first built in the sixteenth century. Samuel Usque was a fugitive from

the Inquisition, and his dialogues, "Consolations for the Tribulations

of Israel" (written in Portuguese, in 1553), are a long drawn-out sigh

of pain passing into a sigh of relief. Usque opens with a passionate

idyl in which the history of Israel in the near past is told by the

shepherd Icabo. To him Numeo and Zicareo offer consolation, and they

pour balm into his wounded heart. The vividness of Usque's style, his

historical insight, his sturdy optimism, his poetical force in

interpreting suffering as the means of attaining the highest life in

God, raise his book above the other works of its class and age.

Usque's poem did not win the same popularity as two other elegiac

histories of the same period. These were the "Rod of Judah" (_Shebet

Jehudah_) and the "Valley of Tears" (_Emek ha-Bachah_). The former was

the work of three generations of the Ibn Verga family. Judah died before

the expulsion from Spain, but his son Solomon participated in the final

troubles of the Spanish Jews, and was even forced to join the ranks of

the Marranos. The grandson, Joseph Ibn Verga, became Rabbi in

Adrianople, and was cultured in classical as well as Jewish lore. Their

composite work, "The Rod of Judah," was completed in 1554. It is a

well-written but badly arranged martyrology, and over all its pages

might be inscribed the Talmudical motto, that God's chastisements of

Israel are chastisements of love. The other work referred to is Joseph

Cohen's "Valley of Tears," completed in 1575. The author was born in

Avignon in 1496, four years after his father had shared in the exile

from Spain. He himself suffered expatriation, for, though a

distinguished physician and the private doctor of the Doge Andrea Doria,

he was expelled with the rest of the Jews from Genoa in 1550. Settled in

the little town of Voltaggio, he devoted himself to writing the annals

of European and Jewish history. His style is clear and forcible, and

recalls the lucid simplicity of the historical books of the Bible.

The only other histories that need be critically mentioned here are the

"Branch of David" (_Zemach David_), the "Chain of Tradition"

(_Shalsheleth ha-Kabbalah_), and the "Light of the Eyes" (_Meör

Enayim_). Abraham de Porta Leone's "Shields of the Mighty" (_Shilte

ha-Gibborim_, printed in Mantua in 1612); Leon da Modena's "Ceremonies

and Customs of the Jews," (printed in Paris in 1637); David Conforte's

"Call of the Generations" (_Kore ha-Doroth_, written in Palestine in

about 1670); Yechiel Heilprin's "Order of Generations" (_Seder

ha-Doroth_, written in Poland in 1725); and Chayim Azulai's "Name of the

Great Ones" (written in Leghorn in 1774), can receive only a bare

mention.

The author of the "Branch of David," David Cans, was born in Westphalia

in about 1540. He was the first German Jew of his age to take real

interest in the study of history. He was a man of scientific culture,

corresponded with Kepler, and was a personal friend of Tycho Brahe. For

the latter Cans made a German translation of parts of the Hebrew

version of the Tables of Alfonso, originally compiled in 1260. Cans

wrote works on mathematical and physical geography, and treatises on

arithmetic and geometry. His history, "Branch of David," was extremely

popular. For a man of his scientific training it shows less critical

power than might have been expected, but the German Jews did not begin

to apply criticism to history till after the age of Mendelssohn. In one

respect, however, the "Branch of David" displays the width of the

author's culture. Not only does he tell the history of the Jews, but in

the second part of his work he gives an account of many lands and

cities, especially of Bohemia and Prague, and adds a striking

description of the secret courts (_Vehmgerichte_) of Westphalia.

It is hard to think that the authors of the "Chain of Tradition" and of

the "Light of the Eyes" were contemporaries. Azariah di Rossi

(1514-1588), the writer of the last mentioned book, was the founder of

historical criticism among the Jews. Elias del Medigo (1463-1498) had

led in the direction, but di Rossi's work anticipated the methods, of

the German school of "scientific" Jewish writers, who, at the beginning

of the present century, applied scientific principles to the study of

Jewish traditions. On the other hand, Gedaliah Ibn Yachya (1515-1587)

was so utterly uncritical that his "Chain of Tradition" was nicknamed by

Joseph Delmedigo the "Chain of Lies." Gedaliah was a man of wealth, and

he expended his means in the acquisition of books and in making journeys

in search of sacred and profane knowledge. Yet Gedaliah made up in style

for his lack of historical method. The "Chain of Tradition" is a

picturesque and enthralling book, it is a warm and cheery retrospect,

and even deserves to be called a prose epic. Besides, many of his

statements that were wont to be treated as altogether unauthentic have

been vindicated by later research. Azariah di Rossi, on the other hand,

is immortalized by his spirit rather than his actual contributions to

historical literature. He came of an ancient family said to have been

carried to Rome by Titus, and lived in Ferrara, where, in 1574, he

produced his "Light of the Eyes." This is divided into three parts, the

first devoted to general history, the second to the Letter of Aristeas,

the third to the solution of several historical problems, all of which

had been neglected by Jews and Christians alike. Azariah di Rossi was

the first critic to open up true lines of research into the Hellenistic

literature of the Jews of Alexandria. With him the true historical

spirit once more descended on the Jewish genius.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Steinschneider.--_Jewish Literature_, p. 75, _seq._, 250

_seq._

A. Neubauer.--Introductions to _Medieval Jewish Chronicles_,

Vols. I and II (Oxford, 1882, etc.).

SELICHOTH.

Zunz.--_Sufferings of the Jews in the Middle Ages_ (translated by

A. Löwy, _Miscellany of the Society of Hebrew Literature_,

Vol. I). See also _J.Q.R._, VIII, pp. 78, 426, 611.

ABRAHAM IBN DAUD.

Graetz.--III, p. 363 [373].

ABRAHAM ZACUTO.

Graetz.--IV, pp. 366, 367, 391 [393].

ELIJAH KAPSALI.

Graetz.--IV, p. 406 [435].

JOSEPH COHEN, USQUE, IBN VERGA.

Graetz.--IV, p. 555 [590].

_Chronicle of Joseph ben Joshua the Priest_ (English translation

by Bialoblotzky. London, 1835-6).

ELIA DELMEDIGO.

Graetz.--IV, p. 290 [312].

DAVID GANS.

Graetz.--IV, p. 638 [679].

GEDALIAH IBN YACHYA.

Graetz.--IV, p. 609 [655].

AZARIAH DI ROSSI.

Graetz.--IV, p. 614 [653].

Chapters on Jewish literature · 第 21 / 25 章