CHAPTER XVI

MOSES NACHMANIDES

French and Spanish Talmudists.--The Tossafists, Asher of

Speyer, Tam, Isaac of Dompaire, Baruch of Ratisbon, Perez of

Corbeil.--Nachmanides' Commentary on the Pentateuch.--Public

controversies between Jews and Christians.

Nachmanides was one of the earliest writers to effect a reconciliation

between the French and the Spanish schools of Jewish literature. On the

one side, his Spanish birth and training made him a friend of the widest

culture; on the other, he was possessed of the French devotion to the

Talmud. Moses, the son of Nachman (Nachmanides, Ramban, 1195-1270),

Spaniard though he was, says, "The French Rabbis have won most Jews to

their view. They are our masters in Talmud, and to them we must go for

instruction." From the eleventh to the fourteenth century, a French

school of Talmudists occupied themselves with the elucidation of the

Talmud, and from the "Additions" (_Tossafoth_) which they compiled they

are known as Tossafists. The Tossafists were animated with an altogether

different spirit from that of the Spanish writers on the Talmud. But

though their method is very involved and over-ingenious, they display so

much mastery of the Talmud, such excellent discrimination, and so keen a

critical insight, that they well earned the fame they have enjoyed. The

earliest Tossafists were the family and pupils of Rashi, but the method

spread from Northern France to Provence, and thence to Spain. The most

famous Tossafists were Isaac, the son of Asher of Speyer (end of the

eleventh century); Tam of Rameru (Rashi's grandson); Isaac the Elder of

Dompaire (Tam's nephew); Baruch of Ratisbon; and Perez of Corbeil.

Nachmanides' admiration for the French method--a method by no means

restricted to the Tossafists--did not blind him to its defects. "They

try to force an elephant through the eye of a needle," he sarcastically

said of some of the French casuists. Nachmanides thus possessed some of

the independence characteristic of the Spanish Jews. He also shared the

poetic spirit of Spain, and his hymn for the Day of Atonement is one of

the finest products of the new-Hebrew muse. The last stanzas run thus:

Thine is the love, O God, and thine the grace,

That holds the sinner in its mild embrace;

Thine the forgiveness, bridging o'er the space

'Twixt man's works and the task set by the King.

Unheeding all my sins, I cling to thee!

I know that mercy shall thy footstool be:

Before I call, O do thou answer me,

For nothing dare I claim of thee, my King!

O thou, who makest guilt to disappear,

My help, my hope, my rock, I will not fear;

Though thou the body hold in dungeon drear,

The soul has found the palace of the King!

Everything that Nachmanides wrote is warm with tender love. He was an

enthusiast in many directions. His heart went out to the French

Talmudists, yet he cherished so genuine an affection for Maimonides that

he defended him with spirit against his detractors. Gentle by nature, he

broke forth into fiery indignation against the French critics of

Maimonides. At the same time his tender soul was attracted by the

emotionalism of the Kabbala, or mystical view of life, a view equally

opposed to the views of Maimonides and of the French school. He tried to

act the part of reconciler, but his intellect, strong as it was, was too

much at the mercy of his emotions for him to win a commanding place in

the controversies of his time.

For a moment we may turn aside from his books to the incidents of his

life. Like Maimonides, he was a physician by profession and a Rabbi by

way of leisure. The most momentous incident in his career in Barcelona

was his involuntary participation in a public dispute with a convert

from the Synagogue. Pablo Christiani burned with the desire to convert

the Jews _en masse_ to Christianity, and in 1263 he induced King Jayme I

of Aragon to summon Nachmanides to a controversy on the truth of

Christianity. Nachmanides complied with the royal command most

reluctantly. He felt that the process of rousing theological animosity

by a public discussion could only end in a religious persecution.

However, he had no alternative but to assent. He stipulated for complete

freedom of speech. This was granted, but when Nachmanides published his

version of the discussion, the Dominicans were incensed. True, the

special commission appointed to examine the charge of blasphemy brought

against Nachmanides reported that he had merely availed himself of the

right of free speech which had been guaranteed to him. He was

nevertheless sentenced to exile, and his pamphlet was burnt. Nachmanides

was seventy years of age at the time. He settled in Palestine, where he

died in about 1270, amid a band of devoted friends and disciples, who

did not, however, reconcile him to the separation from his Spanish home.

"I left my family," he wrote, "I forsook my house. There, with my sons

and daughters, the sweet, dear children whom I brought up on my knees, I

left also my soul My heart and my eyes will dwell with them forever."

The Halachic, or Talmudical, works of Nachmanides have already been

mentioned. His homiletical, or exegetical, writings are of more literary

importance. In "The Sacred Letter" he contended that man's earthly

nature is divine no less than his soul, and he vindicates the "flesh"

from the attacks made on human character by certain forms of

Christianity. The body, according to Nachmanides, is, with all its

functions, the work of God, and therefore perfect. "It is only sin and

neglect that disfigure God's creatures." In another of his books, "The

Law of Man," Nachmanides writes of suffering and death. He offers an

antidote to pessimism, for he boldly asserts that pain and suffering in

themselves are "a service of God, leading man to ponder on his end and

reflect about his destiny." Nachmanides believed in the bodily

resurrection, but held that the soul was in a special sense a direct

emanation from God. He was not a philosopher strictly so-called; he was

a mystic more than a thinker, one to whom God was an intuition, not a

concept of reason.

The greatest work of Nachmanides was his "Commentary on the Pentateuch."

He reveals his whole character in it. In composing his work he had, he

tells us, three motives, an intellectual, a theological, and an

emotional motive. First, he would "satisfy the minds of students, and

draw their heart out by a critical examination of the text." His

exposition is, indeed, based on true philology and on deep and original

study of the Bible. His style is peculiarly attractive, and had he been

content to offer a plain commentary, his work would have ranked among

the best. But he had other desires besides giving a simple explanation

of the text. He had, secondly, a theological motive, to justify God and

discover in the words of Scripture a hidden meaning. In the Biblical

narratives, Nachmanides sees _types_ of the history of man. Thus, the

account of the six days of creation is turned into a prophecy of the

events which would occur during the next six thousand years, and the

seventh day is a type of the millennium. So, too, Nachmanides finds

symbolical senses in Scriptural texts, "for, in the Torah, are hidden

every wonder and every mystery, and in her treasures is sealed every

beauty of wisdom." Finally, Nachmanides wrote, not only for educational

and theological ends, but also for edification. His third purpose was

"to bring peace to the minds of students (laboring under persecution

and trouble), when they read the portion of the Pentateuch on Sabbaths

and festivals, and to attract their hearts by simple explanations and

sweet words." His own enthusiastic and loving temperament speaks in this

part of his commentary. It is true, as Graetz says, that Nachmanides

exercised more influence on his contemporaries and on succeeding ages by

his personality than by his writings. But it must be added that the

writings of Nachmanides are his personality.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

NACHMANIDES.

I.H. Weiss, _Study of the Talmud in the Thirteenth Century_,

_J.Q.R._, I, p. 289.

S. Schechter.--_Studies in Judaism_, p. 99 [120].

Graetz.--III, 17; also III, p. 598 [617].

JACOB TAM.

Graetz.--III, p. 375 [385].

TOSSAFISTS.

Graetz.--III, p. 344 [351], 403 [415].

Chapters on Jewish literature · 第 16 / 25 章