WITH INTRODUCTION AND NOTES BY MILO M. QUAIFE

The Chicago Treaty of 1833, with the negotiating of which the

following documents deal, was an event of considerable importance,

particularly in the history of Illinois and Wisconsin. From the first

advent of the white man in this region the Potawatomi tribe of Indians

had made its home in some portion of the territory adjacent to Lake

Michigan. By the Chicago Treaty of 1833 the Potawatomi and allied

tribes, the Chippewa and Ottawa, at length agreed definitely to leave

this region and find a new home beyond the Mississippi. To the whites

was surrendered their title to some 5,000,000 acres of fertile land in

northern Illinois and southern Wisconsin, embracing the tract between

Lake Michigan and Rock River and extending northward from an east and

west line drawn through the southernmost point of Lake Michigan.

The circumstances attending the negotiation of the treaty were

typical, probably, of those of Indian treaties generally in the first

half of the nineteenth century. Yet two or three facts give to this

treaty a somewhat special degree of interest. One is that we have left

to us fuller and better descriptions of the negotiation of the treaty

than is commonly the case. Another and more important one is that a

larger sum of money was distributed in the form of gratuities more or

less disguised, to facilitate the conduct of the negotiations. It is

with this phase of the subject that the documents here presented deal.

So far as known, no student of American history has ever seriously set

himself the task of illuminating the subject of the process whereby

the American government secured from the red man, in successive

treaties, title to the greater portion of the land of continental

United States.[112] A comprehensive study of this subject would reveal

much of interest and value; it would be certain, too, to disclose much

of a nature far from flattering to the American government and nation.

That the Chicago Treaty of 1833 would afford some material of this

sort for the construction of the narrative, it requires no hardihood

to affirm. Charges of improper influences and conduct in connection

with the framing of the treaty began to be made as soon as it was

negotiated. Some of them, doubtless, were irresponsible and unfounded,

but there is reason for supposing that this was far from being true

with respect to all of them. The letter of Governor Porter is

preserved in the Burton Library at Detroit, and acknowledgment is due

to Mr. Burton for the copy we present. The charges against Porter are

copied from a contemporary broadside preserved among the Martin

manuscripts in the Wisconsin Historical Library. The two documents go

hand in hand, for it is evident that the charges which Porter sought

in his letter to Jackson to refute are identical with those stated in

the broadside, although the latter seems not to contain all the

material which had been submitted to Jackson and which was referred by

him to Porter to answer. Readers who may be interested in pursuing the

subject further may find a discussion of the Chicago Treaty of 1833 in

the present editor’s _Chicago and the Old Northwest 1673-1835_, 353-66.

The Wisconsin Magazine of History, Volume 1, 1917-1918 · 第 119 / 189 题