ESSENCE OF PARLIAMENT.

_Monday, April 26th._--Among the many Members of the House who have held

His Majesty's commission there are, no doubt, some rather eccentric

persons, but that hardly justified Mr. PALMER in suggesting that they

should be deprived in debate of the customary prefix "gallant." The SPEAKER

gave no encouragement to the idea, and was still more shocked by Mr.

DEVLIN'S proposal that all these courteous expressions should be dropped,

and that Members should "call each other by own names." It would certainly

add to the pungency but not to the peacefulness of debate if the

Nationalist Leader were allowed to refer to "Sir EDWAR-R-D CAR-R-SON,"

instead of to "the right honourable gentleman the Member for Duncair-r-n."

At Question-time Lord ROBERT CECIL was informed that a report on the state

of Ireland was being prepared and would shortly be circulated. But a

further crop of outrages so moved him that he could not wait for the facts,

and forthwith moved the adjournment. The ensuing debate was not very

helpful. Lord ROBERT demanded the restoration of law and order in tones so

vigorous that an hon. Member called out, "A New Cromwell!" He did not seem

to like the comparison and later on took most un-Cromwellian exception to

the Government's methods of "coercion." Mr. BONAR LAW'S speech could in the

circumstances be little more than an elaboration of "Do not shoot the

pianist; he is doing his best."

[Illustration: "The Hon. Member says I am like OLIVER CROMWELL."--_Lord

ROBERT CECIL._]

_Tuesday, April 27th._--On the report of the Budget resolutions there was,

of course, the usual attempt to get rid of the tea-duty. As Colonel WARD

sarcastically pointed out, opposition to this particular impost has been

for years the "by-election stunt" of every party in turn. To-day the

rejection was moved by the Labour Party, and when the CHANCELLOR OF THE

EXCHEQUER asked if in exchange they were prepared to extend the income-tax

downwards Mr. J. H. THOMAS boldly declared that for his part he was quite

ready. But as it appeared that his idea of the exemption-limit was L325 a

year Mr. CHAMBERLAIN thanked him for nothing.

Among the varied and ingenious arguments adduced by Colonel GUINNESS

against the increased tax on sparkling wines the one that he evidently

thought most likely to soften the heart of the CHANCELLOR was that it would

reduce consumption, since at current prices it would be an offence against

good taste for anyone in this country to be seen drinking champagne. But

Mr. CHAMBERLAIN could not agree. In his view the larger the taxation on the

bottle the greater the patriotism of the consumer.

[Illustration: "Who has a better right [than the Labour Party] to a good

dinner and a good cigar?"--_Mr. JACK JONES._]

In advocating a slight relaxation of the cigar-duty Mr. HURD quoted Mr.

BONAR LAW for the _dictum_ that the excellence of a dinner largely depended

upon the quality of the cigar that followed it, and went on to remark that

he did not on this matter expect the support of the Labour Party. Mr. JACK

JONES stentoriously resented this slur upon their taste. "We like a good

cigar as well as anybody," he shouted, adding somewhat superfluously, "Who

has a better right to a good dinner?" This outburst may have shaken the

CHANCELLOR'S conviction that Havana cigars are indubitably of the nature of

luxuries.

_Wednesday, April 28th._--According to the Duke of RUTLAND, who made an

eloquent plea for the better protection of wild birds, their worst enemy is

the village schoolmaster, whose motto seems to be, "It's a fine day; let us

go out and collect something." I cannot help thinking that his Grace must

have some special dominie in his mind and was arguing from the particular

to the general.

The story of Lady ASTOR'S seat is beginning to resemble a penny novelette.

Evicted by the bold bad Baronet below the Gangway the heroine has been

enabled by the courtesy of one of Nature's noblemen, in the person of Mr.

WILL THORNE, to find a new home in the precincts of the Labour Party, and

seems quite happy again.

Since the American Senate takes so kindly an interest in our affairs as to

pass resolutions in favour of Irish independence, Mr. RONALD MCNEILL

thought it would be only friendly if the House of Commons were to

reciprocate with a motion in support of the Filipinos' claim to

self-determination. Mr. BONAR LAW fought shy of the suggestion and

preferred Sir EDWARD CARSON'S idea that it was better for each country to

leave other countries alone. "I would be very thankful," he added rather

wistfully, "if Ireland would leave us alone." But his appeal fell on deaf

ears, for, at the instance of Mr. T. P. O'CONNOR, the House spent most of

the evening in discussing the threat of the Irish dock-labourers in

Liverpool to paralyse the trade of the port unless the Government released

the hunger-strikers at Wormwood Scrubs.

The rest of the time was spent in getting the House to agree to the

expansion of the Excess Profits Tax. This was largely secured by the

special pleading of Mr. BALDWIN. His argument that to call the tax

"temporary," as his chief did last year, was quite compatible with

maintaining and even increasing it, was more ingenious than convincing, but

his promise that, if the shoe really pinched the small business and the new

business, the CHANCELLOR would do his best to ease it, combined with an

urgent "whip" to secure a big majority for the impugned impost.

[Illustration: COLONEL WEDGWOOD PROTESTS AGAINST MINISTERIAL

"IMPERTINENCE."]

_Thursday, April 29th._--Mr. WINSTON CHURCHILL gave an account of the

Easter riots in Jerusalem, where Jews and Moslems have been breaking one

another's heads to the glory of God, for all the world like Irishmen in

Belfast. He also promised to give further information as soon as Lord

ALLENBY'S report should be received. Lord ROBERT CECIL, who has lately

developed an unlawyer-like tendency to jump to conclusions ahead of the

facts, made what sounded distinctly like a suggestion that the British

officers on the spot had been remiss in their duty, and thereby earned from

Mr. CHURCHILL a dignified castigation which pleased the House.

Crowned with olive-branches plucked from San Remo the PRIME MINISTER

celebrated one of his now familiar peace-triumphs. Everybody knows the

procedure on these occasions--the crowded House, the cheers raised by the

faithful Coalitionists as the victor is seen making his way to the Table,

and then the speech, so unvarying in its construction that I fancy there

must be a sealed pattern for it in the archives of No. 10, Downing Street.

First comes a recital of the immense difficulties of the problems to be

solved--in this case including a really serious difference of opinion with

our good friends the French; then a little comic relief at the expense of

his arch-critic in the Press, who on this occasion had surpassed himself in

"simian clatter"; next a summary of the wonderful results achieved--chiefly

the establishment of direct relations with the hitherto boycotted

Governments of Russia and Germany; and lastly a declaration that all

differences and difficulties had melted away, and that henceforward the

Allies would be a band of brothers.

Once more Mr. ASQUITH disappointed his more impetuous supporters and

displayed his statesmanship by a speech in which he practically said ditto

to the PRIME MINISTER; the only suspicion of a sting being contained in his

suggestion that the Supreme Council had now outlived its usefulness and

should promptly be replaced by the League of Nations.

Mr. BOTTOMLEY, on the contrary, was all sting and no statesmanship. I

gather that he has been conducting an unofficial conference on his own, and

as the result of his conversations with distinguished but anonymous foreign

statesmen has arrived at quite different conclusions from those of the

PRIME MINISTER. The fact that he was kept waiting on the pier at Boulogne

while the British Delegation went off in a special steamer, on which he was

not invited to embark, may have imparted an extra spice of rancour to his

strictures.

* * * * *

[Illustration: _Betty (hearing the cuckoo's call the first time)._ "MUMMY,

DEAR, DO ALL THE OTHER DICKY-BIRDS HAVE TO GO AND FIND IT NOW?"]

* * * * *

[Illustration: _Customer._ "I SEE CORONODORAS ARE GOING TO BE FIVE

SHILLINGS EACH NOW."

_Barber's Assistant._ "WELL, WE SHALL 'AVE TO SMOKE 'EM NEARER THE END,

THAT'S ALL."]

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 158, 1920-05-05 · 第 26 / 35 题