CHAPTER XXII.

“ADVERTISING TIPSTERS” AND “BETTING COMMISSIONERS.”

_The Vice of Gambling on the increase among the

Working-classes_—_Sporting_ “_Specs_”—_A_ “_Modus_”—_Turf

Discoveries_—_Welshers_—_The Vermin of the Betting-field_—_Their

Tactics_—_The Road to Ruin_.

THERE can be no doubt that the vice of gambling is on the increase

amongst the English working-classes. Of this no better proof is afforded

than in the modern multiplication of those newspapers specially devoted

to matters “sportive.” Twenty years ago there were but three or four

sporting newspapers published in London; now there are more than a dozen.

It would, however, be unfair to regard the rapid growth of these

questionable prints as an undoubted symptom of the deepening depravity of

the masses. The fact is this: that though the national passion for

gambling, for betting, and wagering, and the excitement of seeing this or

that “event” decided, has increased of late, it is chiefly because the

people have much more leisure now than of yore. They must have amusement

for their disengaged hours, and they naturally seek that for which they

have the greatest liking.

It is a comforting reflection, however, that in their sports and pastimes

Englishmen, and especially Londoners, of the present generation, are less

barbarous than those of the last. Setting horse-racing aside, anyone who

now takes up for perusal the ordinary penny sporting paper will find

therein nothing more repugnant to his sensibilities, as regards human

performers, than records of swimming, and cricket, and running, and

walking, and leaping; and as regards four-footed creatures, the discourse

will be of dogs “coursing” or racing, or killing rats in a pit. In the

present enlightened age we do not fight cocks and “shy” at hens tied to a

stake at the Shrove-Tuesday fair; neither do we fight dogs, or pit those

sagacious creatures to bait bulls. In a newspaper before me, not a

quarter of a century old, there is a minute and graphic account of a

bull-baiting, at which in the pride of his heart the owner of a bull-dog

did a thing that in the present day would insure for him twelve months of

hard labour on the treadmill, but which in the “good old time” was merely

regarded as the act of a spirited sportsman. A white bull-dog, “Spurt”

by name, had performed prodigies of valour against a bear brought before

him and before a crowded audience. Finally, however, the exhausted

creature bungled in a delicate act of the performance, and those who had

bet against the dog exasperated its master by clapping their hands.

“D’ye think that he can’t do it?” roared the dog’s owner; “why, I’ll take

ten to one in twenties that he does it on three legs—with one foot

chopped off.” “Done!” somebody cried. Whereon the valiant bulldog owner

called for a cleaver, and setting the left fore-paw of his faithful dog

on the ledge of the pit, he hacked it off at a blow. Then instantly he

urged the creature at the bear again, and, raging with pain, it at once

sprang at its shaggy opponent and pinned it.

It cannot be denied that occasionally there still appears in the sporting

newspapers some brief account of a “mill” that has recently taken place

between those once highly-popular gentlemen—the members of the “P.R.”

But public interest in this department of “sport” is fast dying out; and

not one reader in a hundred would care to wade through column after

column of an account of how the Brompton Bison smashed the snout of the

Bermondsey Pet; and how the latter finally gained the victory by

battering his opponent’s eyes until he was blind and “came up groggy,”

and could not even see his man, let alone avoid the sledgehammer blows

that were still pounding his unhappy ribs. There are left very few

indeed of those individuals who, as “sportsmen,” admire

Raw-Head-and-Bloody-Bones as master of the ceremonies.

All the while, however, it is to be feared that the sporting newspaper of

the present day reveals the existence of really more mischief, more

substantial immorality and rascality than ever appeared in their pages

before. As a quarter of a century since pugilism was the main feature

with the sporting press, now it is horse-racing; not for its sake, but

for the convenient peg it affords to hang a bet on. It may be safely

asserted that among Londoners not one in five hundred could mention the

chief qualities a racer should possess; but this goes for nothing; or

perhaps it might be said that it goes for everything. It is each man’s

faith in the ignorance of his neighbour, and his high respect for his own

sagacity and his “good luck,” wherein resides the secret of the

horse-betting mania at the present time afflicting the nation.

As the reader will have remarked, so rapidly has the disease in question

spread during the past few years that Government has at last thought fit

to interpose the saving arm of the law between the victim and the

victimiser. Numerous as are the sporting papers, and to the last degree

accommodating in acting as mediums of communication between the ignorant

people who stand in need of horsey counsel and the “knowing ones” of the

turf who, for a small consideration, are ever ready to give it, it was

discovered by certain bold schemers that a yet wider field of operation

was as yet uncultivated. To be sure, what these bold adventurers

meditated was contrary to law, and of that they were well aware, and at

first acted on the careful Scotch maxim of not putting out their hand

farther than at a short notice they could draw it back again. Success,

however, made them audacious. Either the law slept, or else it

indolently saw what they were up to and winked, till at last, growing

each week more courageous, the new gambling idea, that took the name of

“Spec,” became of gigantic dimensions.

Throughout lower London, and the shady portions of its suburbs, the

window of almost every public-house and beer-shop was spotted with some

notice of these “Specs.” There were dozens of them. There were the

“Deptford Spec,” and the “Lambeth Spec,” and the “Great Northern Spec,”

and the “Derby Spec;” but they all meant one and the same thing—a

lottery, conducted on principles more or less honest, the prize to be

awarded according to the performances of certain racehorses. All on a

sudden, however, the officers of the law swooped down on the gambling

band, and carried them, bag and baggage, before a magistrate to answer

for their delinquency.

At the examination of the first batch at Bow-street, as well as at their

trial, much curious information was elicited. It appeared that the

originator of the scheme lived at Deptford, and that he had pursued it

for so long as six or seven years.

The drawings were on Saturday nights, when the great majority of the

working-people had received their wages, and when, it having been noised

abroad that these lotteries were going on, they were likely to attend and

to expend their money in the purchase of such of the tickets as had not

been sold already.

If all the tickets were not sold, a portion of each prize was deducted,

and the holders of prizes were paid in proportion to the number of

tickets that were sold; and, as it was impossible to know what number of

tickets had actually been sold, it could not be determined whether the

distribution had or had not been carried out with fairness, or how much

had been deducted to pay for expenses, and to afford a profit to the

promoters of the concern. Several cabloads of tickets, result-sheets,

&c. were seized at the residences of the managers of the “spec.”

There were numerous “partners” in the firm, and they were frequently at

the chief’s residence, and were instrumental in carrying out the

lotteries. One or other was always present at the drawing of the numbers

and at the distribution of the prizes. One partner was a stationer in

the Strand, and at his shop were sold the tickets for these lotteries,

and also what are termed the “result-sheets,” which were sold at one

penny each, and each of which contained the results of a “draw,” setting

forth which of the ticket-holders had been fortunate enough to draw the

several prizes, and also advertising the next “spec” or lottery. Each of

these “specs” related to a particular race, and the tickets were

substantially alike. Each had on the top the words “Deptford Spec,” with

a number and letter, and in the corner the name of a race, as “Newmarket

Handicap Sweep,” “Liverpool Grand National Steeplechase.” In each of

these there were 60,000 subscribers, and in that for the Thousand Guineas

75,000. The prizes varied in proportion; but in one they were £500 for

the first horse, £300 for the second, and £150 for the third. Among the

starters was to be divided £500, and among the non-starters £600. There

were also 200 prizes of £1, and 300 prizes of 10_s._ It was stated on

the tickets that the prizes would go with the stakes, and that the

result-sheets would be published on the Monday after the draw. There was

also a stipulation that, in the event of any dispute arising, it should

be referred to the editors of the _Era_, _Bell’s Life_, and the _Sporting

Times_, and the decision of the majority to be binding. If the numbers

were not filled up, the prizes were to be reduced in proportion; with

some other details. There was no printer’s name to the tickets or

result-sheets.

The detective police-officers, in whose hands the getting-up of evidence

for the prosecution had been intrusted, proved that, after they purchased

their tickets, they went up the stairs in a public-house about a quarter

to seven o’clock. They went into the club-room, where about sixty or

seventy persons had assembled, and where the managers of the lotteries

were selling tickets. The witness purchased one, and paid a shilling for

it. It had the same form as the others, and the draw was to be held that

night. Someone got up and said (reading from several sheets of paper in

his hand), “4,200 tickets not sold;” this he repeated twice. He then

proceeded to read from the papers the numbers of the tickets unsold. The

reading occupied about half-an-hour. After the numbers were read out,

they commenced to undo a small bundle of tickets, which they placed upon

the table. They fetched down some more bundles similar to the first, and

continued undoing them until they had undone about a bushel. The tickets

were all numbered. They then proceeded to place all the tickets in a

large wheel-of-fortune, after mixing them up well with a quantity of sand

to prevent their sticking together. The wheel was a kind of barrel

revolving on axles, with a hole for the hand. One of the managers asked

if any gentleman had got a sporting paper. No one answered, so he

produced one himself; he (witness) believed the _Sporting Life_. He

said, “Will any gentleman read the names of the horses for the Grand

National?” The names of the horses were then read out by those at the

table, while tickets were drawn for each till all the horses were called.

The tickets were then put down on the table, and the defendants proceeded

to undo another packet. They undid a heap, about a quarter the bulk of

the first lot. They put these into another wheel-of-fortune. Having

done so, two boys about fourteen or fifteen years old came into the room,

and after divesting themselves of their jackets and tucking up their

sleeves, each went to the wheels, which were turned by some of the

persons in the room. One of the managers called out the numbers of the

tickets and the name of the horse to each prize.

It need only be mentioned, in proof of the popularity enjoyed by these

“specs,” that within a fortnight afterwards a similar scene was enacted

at the same public-house. A detective went to the Bedford Arms, where he

heard that a distribution of prizes was to be made. He went into the

club-room. The managers were there, with about forty prizeholders. A

person produced a ticket and handed it to one of the directors, who,

after examining it, said “All right,” and paid the money—405_l._—which

consisted of cheques, notes, and gold. The holder of the prize got

405_l._ for a 500_l._ prize, it being supposed all the tickets were not

sold, and a reduction was made in proportion. About forty prizes were

given away in this manner during the evening. After the prizes were

drawn, each person was asked to put something in the bowl for the two

boys.

The prisoners were committed for trial, but were lucky enough to escape

punishment. For years they had been defying the law, and feathering

their nests on the strength of the silly confidence reposed in them by

the thousands of dupes who ran after their precious “specs;” and the

sentence of the judge was in effect no more severe than this—it bade them

beware how they so committed themselves for the future. Of course the

released lottery-agents promised that they _would_ beware, and doubtless

they will. Without being called on to do so, they even volunteered an

act of noble generosity. As before stated, the police had found in their

possession and seized a large sum of money—fourteen hundred pounds. This

the good gentlemen of the lottery suggested might be distributed amongst

the charities of that parish their leader honoured with his residence,

and with the Recorder’s sanction, and amid the murmured plaudits of a

crowded court, the suggestion was adopted. The oddest part of the

business was, however, that the benevolent gentlemen gave away what

didn’t belong to them, the fourteen hundred pounds representing the many

thousand shillings the believers in “specs” had intrusted to their

keeping. However, everybody appeared to think that the discharged

“speculators” had behaved honourably, not to say nobly, and there the

case ended.

The “spec” bubble exploded, the police authorities show symptoms of

bringing the machinery of the law to bear on a wider-spread and more

insidious mischief of the same breed. With the betting infatuation there

has naturally sprung up a swarm of knowing hungry pike ready to take

advantage of it. These are the advertising tipsters, the “turf

prophets,” and the “betting commissioners.” Driven from the streets,

where for so long they publicly plied their trade, they have resorted to

the cheap sporting press to make known their amiable intentions and

desires, and the terms on which they are still willing, even from the

sacred privacy of their homes, to aid and counsel all those faint-hearted

ones who despair of ruining themselves soon enough without such friendly

help.

Were it not for the awful amount of misery and depravity it involves, it

would be amusing to peruse the various styles of address from the

“prophet” to the benighted, and to mark the many kinds of bait that are

used in “flat-catching,” as the turf slang has it, as well as the

peculiar method each fisherman has in the sort and size of hook he uses,

and the length of line.

Entitled to rank foremost in this numerous family is an unassuming but

cheerful and confident gentleman, who frequently, and at an expensive

length, advertises himself as the happy originator and proprietor of what

he styles a “Modus.” It is described as an instrument of “beauty, force,

and power,” and it is, doubtless, only that its owner, if he kept it all

to himself, and set it going at full blast, would undoubtedly win all the

money in the country, and so put an end to the sport, that he is induced

to offer participation in its working at the small equivalent of a few

postage-stamps. In his modest description of his wonderful “Modus,” Mr.

M. says:

“In daily realising incomparably rich winnings with this Modus,

another great and distinguished victory was very successfully

achieved at Newmarket Spring Meeting. Mr. M.’s distinguished Winning

Modus, for beauty, force, and power, has never yet failed in clearly

realising treasures of weekly winnings and successes. For this

reason, this week’s eminent and moneyed success was the result with

this Modus at the Newmarket Spring Meeting. For acquiring an

ascendency over any other capital-making turf discovery, either

secret or public, it is truly marvellous. In fact, this Winning

Modus never deteriorates in its character, immense riches, or

winnings, for it is strikingly and truthfully infallible and

never-failing. At any rate, it will win 18,000_l._ or 20,000_l._ for

any investor ere the final close of the season. Do not think this

anywise fiction, for it is strict verity. Mr. M. takes this

opportunity to respectfully thank his patronisers for their

compliments, congratulations, and presents. It is needless to remind

his patrons that an illustrious and rich success will easily be

achieved at Chester next week, when Mr. M.’s Winning Modus will again

realise its infallible success in thousands.”

It is to be assumed that Mr. M. has already by means of his own “Modus”

fished out of the risky waters of gambling a few of these “18,000_l._ or

20,000_l._” he speaks so lightly of; and doubtless the reader’s first

reflection will be, that he should hasten to expend a trifle of his

immense winnings in securing for himself at least as fair a knowledge of

the English language as is possessed by a “dame-school” scholar of six

years old. It is evident that Mr. M. has all the money at his command

which he is ever likely to require, or, of course, he would not reveal

his precious secret on such ridiculously easy terms. He would patent it,

and come down heavily on any rash person who infringed his rights, more

valuable than those that rest in Mr. Graves, or even Mr. Betts, the great

captain of “capsules.” No, he has won all the money he is ever likely to

need; indeed, how can a man ever be poor while he retains possession of

that wonderful talismanic “Modus,” a touch of which converts a

betting-book into a solid, substantial gold-mine? Still, he is exacting

as regards the gratitude of those whom his invention enriches. It is his

pride to record as many instances as possible of the dutiful thankfulness

of his fellow-creatures, and as, with pity and regret, he is aware that

the only earnest of a man’s sincerity is that which takes the shape of

the coinage of the realm, he is compelled, though sorely against his own

confiding and generous nature, to attach much weight to thankofferings of

a pecuniary nature. Every week he appends to his sketch of the working

of his “Modus” a list of those “patronisers” from whom he has most

recently heard. It may be urged by unbelievers that in this there is no

novelty, since from time immemorial the quacks of other professions have

done precisely the same thing; but it must be admitted that this should

at least be taken as proof of Mr. M.’s indifference to the evil opinion

of the censorious. Let us take the testimonials for the week of the

Chester Races, which, as he says, “are promiscuously selected from a vast

number:”

“SIR,—For distinction, honour, and fame, your marvellous winning

Modus is worthy of its renown. I am happy in asserting it has won me

4,220_l._ nett so quickly and readily this season. Accept the

200_l._ enclosed.—I am, &c.

M. ARTHUR PORSON.”

“Mr. M. undoubtedly considers his winning Modus an infallible one.

Mr. G. Melville certainly considers it is too. At any rate, Mr.

Melville is the very fortunate winner of upwards of 6,400_l._

6,400_l._ at once is a tangible criterion as to its great worth for

procuring these heavy winnings. Mr. Melville forwards a sum of money

with his congratulations, as a present. Mr. M. will please accept

the same.”

“SIR,—Do me a favour in accepting the enclosed cheque for 50_l._

Through the instrumentality of your certainly very successful winning

Modus, I am, to my infinite pleasure, quickly becoming a certain and

never-failing winner of thousands; for already has its golden agency

marvellously won me 3,400_l._

“C. CONYERS GRESHAM.”

In conclusion, this benefactor of his species says: “For this successful

winning ‘Modus,’ and its infinite riches, forward a stamped directed

envelope, addressed Mr. M., Rugby.” That is all. Forward a directed

envelope to Rugby, and in return you shall be placed, booted and spurred,

on the road to infinite riches. If, starting as a beggar, you allow your

head to be turned by the bewildering pelting of a pitiless storm of

sovereigns, and ride to the devil, Mr. M. is not to blame.

The astounding impudence of these advertising dodgers is only equalled by

the credulity of their dupes. How long Mr. M. has presented his precious

“Modus” to the sporting public through the columns of “horsey”

newspapers, I cannot say; but this much is certain: that according to his

success has been the proportion of vexation and disappointment he has

caused amongst the geese who have trusted him. We are assured that

impostors of the M. school reap golden harvests; that thousands on

thousands weekly nibble at his baits; consequently thousands on thousands

weekly have their silly eyes opened to the clumsy fraud to which they

have been the victims. But M. of Rugby flourishes still; he still vaunts

the amazing virtues, and the beauty, force, and power of his “Modus,” and

brags of this week’s eminent and moneyed success as though it were a

matter of course. Mr. M. of Rugby is less modest than some members of

his fraternity. Here is an individual who affects the genteel:

“A CARD.—Private Racing Information!!—A gentleman who has been a

breeder and owner of racehorses, and now in a good commercial

position, attained by judicious betting, enjoying rare opportunities

of early intelligence from most successful and dangerous stables,

being himself debarred by partnership restrictions from turf

speculations on his own account, thinks he might utilise the great

advantages at his disposal by leaving himself open to correspondence

with the racing public. This is a genuine advertisement, and worth

investigating.—Address, —, Post-office, Stafford. Unquestionable

references. Directed envelopes. No ‘systems’ or other fallacies.”

It will be observed that, despite the good position attained by the

advertiser by “judicious betting,” not only was he glad to escape from

the field where his fortune was founded, and to take refuge in the dull

jog-trot regions of commerce, but his “partners” prohibit him in future

from collecting golden eggs from any racing mare’s-nest whatsoever. He

has made a fat pocket by the judicious exercise of a peculiar and

difficult science he is well versed in; but still he is tolerated by his

brother-members of the firm only on the distinct understanding that he

never does it again. Perhaps he has grown over-rich, and the rest and

seclusion is necessary to the complete restoration of his health.

Perhaps he owes to “Modus”—but no, the retired breeder and owner of

racehorses distinctly informs us that he has no faith in “systems” or

other fallacies: “lying excepted,” is the amendment that at once occurs

to the individual of common sense.

Education is reckoned as a prime essential to success in most trades; but

in that of betting it would appear unnecessary, in order to realise a

fortune for himself or his fellow-mortals, that an advertising tipster or

betting-man should be master of the English language, let alone of the

cardinal virtues. Here is a member of the Manchester Subscription-rooms,

in proof:

“George D—y, member of the Manchester Subscription-rooms, attends

personally all the principal race-meetings. Some persons having used

the above name, G. D. gives notice that he has not anyone betting for

him, and anyone doing so are welshers.”

Another gentleman eschews prophecy, and would throw “Modus” to the dogs,

only that possibly his natural instincts peculiarly qualify him for

knowing that to do so would be to cast an undeserved indignity on those

respectable creatures. He goes in for “secret information.” He does not

seek to mystify his readers by adopting a _nom-de-plume_, such as “Stable

Mouse,” or “Earwig,” or “Spy in the Manger.” He boldly owns his identity

as John —, of Leicester-square, London, and arrogates to himself an

“outsider” that is to beat anything else in the field. “Do not be

guided,” says this frank and plain-spoken sportsman—“do not be guided by

the betting, but back my outsider, whose name has scarcely ever been

mentioned in the quotations, because the very clever division to which it

belongs have put their money on so quietly that their secret is known to

only a few. I am in the swim, and know that the horse did not start for

one or two races it could have won easily, but has been expressly saved

for this. I have several other absolute certainties, and guarantee to be

particularly successful at Chester. Terms: fourteen stamps the full

meeting. Many of the minor events will be reduced to certainties; and in

order to take advantage of it, I am willing to telegraph the very latest,

without charge, to those who will pay me honourably from winnings; or I

will invest any amount remitted to me, guaranteeing to telegraph before

the race is run the full particulars.—John G., Leicester-square, London.”

What a pity it is that those who flatter themselves that they are

intellectually qualified to embark in one of the most hazardous and

difficult ways of making money should not be at the pains of carefully

reading and deliberating on barefaced attempts at imposture, such as are

disclosed in the above! John G. is one of the “clever division,” he

says. So much for his honesty, when he admits that he is in the “swim”

with men who have been tampering with the same wonderful “outsider,” and

so manœuvering as to throw dust in the eyes of unsuspecting persons. So

much for the wealth and position of the “swim,” when John G., a confessed

member of it, is ready to betray his confederates for the small

consideration of fourteenpence, or less, should you fall short of that

amount of faith in his integrity. He will “leave it to you, sir,” as

does the sweeper who clears the snow from your door, or the industrious

wretch who brushes the dust from your coat on the racecourse. Or he will

invest any sum you may feel disposed to intrust to him. There is not the

least doubt of it; and what is more, you may rest assured that he will

invest it so as to make sure of a substantial return. How else is he to

cut a respectable figure at Epsom or Ascot, and join the bold-faced,

leather-lunged gang, who, with a little money-pouch slung at their side,

and a little, a _very_ little money within the pouch, elbow their way

through the press, bawling, “I’ll lay” on this, that, or t’other?

J. G. of Leicester-square is not the only advertising tipster who

professes to be “in the swim,” and on that account to be in a position to

act as a traitor to his friends, and the benefactor of the strange

public. Here is the announcement of another gentleman.

“GREAT EVENTS!—Enormous odds!!—Two horses have been expressly saved;

and one of the best judges on the turf tells me they are the greatest

certainties he ever knew. As for another event, it is quite at the

mercy of the owner of a certain animal. I do not hesitate to say

that there never was, and never will be, a better chance of pulling

off a large stake at a trifling risk; for I can obtain the enormous

odds of 1,840_l._ to 1_l._, or 920_l._ to 10_s._, or 460_l._ to

5_s._; or I will send the secret for fourteen stamps.”

Here is a Munchausen fit to shake hands with and claim as a brother J. G.

of Leicester-square. He knows of a forthcoming race, and he likewise

knows of a man who intends to run in it a certain horse that will hold

the equine contest at his mercy. It is but reasonable to assume that the

noble animal in question will obey the dictates of his nature, and not

give way to weak forbearance or foolish generosity. Undoubtedly,

therefore, it will win the race; and the advertiser, if he puts 5_s._ on

it, is _sure_ of bagging 460_l._! And yet he is found competing in the

same dirty field with a score of his kindred, clamouring for

fourteenpence in postage-stamps.

“Stable secrets! stable secrets!” shrieks the “Sporting Doctor;” secrets

so very precious that he cannot possibly betray them for less than

fivepence each. Send fifteen stamps, and receive in return the “true and

certain winners of the Chester, the Derby, and the Oaks.” The “Sporting

Doctor” hails from a back-street in the Blackfriars-road. The

“Barber-poet” of Paddington, in touching terms, implores his noble

patrons to assist him in advising his fellow-creatures of the “good

things he has for them.” “Show my circulars to your friends,” he says;

“it will be to my interest for you to do so. I will give 100_l._ to any

charitable institution, if the advice I give is not in every instance the

best that money can obtain.” The next tipster on the list goes farther

than this. He boldly avows he will forfeit a large sum of money unless

he “spots” the identical winners “first and second.” Of course, nothing

can be more transparent than bombast of this sort; but here it is in

black-and-white:

“Mr. Ben W. will forfeit 500_l._ if he does not send first and second

for the Chester Cup. Send four stamps and stamped envelope, and

promise a present, and I will send you the Chester Cup, Great

Northern, Derby, and Oaks winners.—Address, —, Waterloo-road,

London.”

Mr. Benjamin W.’s suggestion of a “promised present” is, however, no

novelty with the advertising tipster. Many of the fraternity ask a

cash-down payment for the “tip” they send—a sum barely sufficient to buy

them a pint of beer—professing to rely contentedly on the generosity of

their “patronisers,” as Mr. Modus styles them. Occasionally are appended

to the advertisements gentle remonstrances and reminders that the

confidence the tipster reposed in his patroniser seems to have been

misplaced. The latter is requested “not to forget what is due from one

gentleman, though in a humble sphere, to another.” One gentleman becomes

quite pathetic in an appeal of this kind:

“The winners of Great Northern, Derby, and Oaks for thirteen stamps,

or one event four stamps, with promise of present from winnings.

Send a stamped envelope without delay. Gentlemen are requested to

act honourably, and send me the promised percentage on the Two

Thousand, for the labourer is worthy of his hire.—Address, —

Cumberland-street, Chelsea, London.”

Another gentleman, blessed with an amount of coolness and candour that

should insure him a competency if every horse were swept off the face of

the earth to-morrow, publishes the following; and the reader will please

bear in mind that these various advertisements are clipped out of the

sporting papers, and copied to the letter:

“TAKE NOTICE!!—I never advertise unless I am confident of success. I

have now a real good thing for Derby at 100 to 1; sure to get a

place, for which 25 to 1 can be obtained.—Enclose 1_s._ stamps and

stamped addressed envelope, and secure this moral.—Remember Perry

Down.—Address, H— Post-office, Reading.”

It may be remarked, that everything that is highly promising becomes, in

the slang of the advertising tipster, a “moral;” but there are two

dictionary definitions of the term—one affecting its relation to good or

bad human life, and the other which is described as “the instruction of a

fable.” It is possibly in this last sense that the tipster uses the

word. “Send for my ‘moral’ on the Great Northern Handicap,” writes Mr.

Wilson of Hull. “It is said that the golden ball flies past every man

once in his lifetime!” cries “Quick-sight” of John-street, Brixton. “See

it in my moral certainty for the Derby. See it, and fail not to grasp

it. Fourteen stamps (uncut) will secure it.”

This should indeed be glad news for those unfortunates whose vision has

hitherto been gladdened in the matter of golden balls only by seeing them

hanging in triplet above the pawnbroker’s friendly door. Fancy being

enabled to grasp the golden ball—the ball that is to stump out poverty,

and send the bails of impecuniosity flying into space never to return, at

the small cost of fourteen postage-stamps! They must be uncut, by the

way, or their talismanic virtue will be lost. The worst of it is, that

you are unable either to see it or grasp it until Quicksight sees and

grasps your fourteen stamps; and if you should happen to miss the golden

ball after all, it is doubtful if he would return you your poor

one-and-twopence as some consolation in your disappointment. He would

not do this, but he would be very happy to give you another chance. His

stock of “golden balls” is very extensive. He has been supplying them,

or rather the chance of grasping them, at fourteenpence each any time

during this five years, and he is doubtless in a position to “keep the

ball rolling” (the golden ball) until all his customers are supplied.

By the way, it should be mentioned, that the advertiser last quoted, as

well as several others here instanced, terminate their appeals by begging

the public to beware of welshers!

Does the reader know what is a “welsher”—the creature against whose

malpractices the sporting public are so emphatically warned? Probably he

does not. It is still more unlikely that he ever witnessed a “welsher”

hunt; and as I there have the advantage of him, it may not be out of

place here to enlighten him on both points. A “welsher” is a person who

contracts a sporting debt without a reasonable prospect of paying it.

There is no legal remedy against such a defaulter. Although the law to a

large extent countenances the practice of betting, and will even go the

length of lending the assistance of its police towards keeping such order

that a multitude may indulge in its gambling propensities comfortably, it

will not recognise as a just debt money owing between two wagerers. It

is merely “a debt of honour,” and the law has no machinery that will

apply thereto. The consequence is, that amongst the betting fraternity,

when a man shows himself dishonourable, he is punished by the mob that at

the time of the discovery of his defalcation may happen to surround him;

and with a degree of severity according to the vindictiveness and

brutality of the said mob. On the occasion of my witnessing a “welsher

hunt,” I was present at the races that in the autumn of 1868 were held in

Alexandra-park at Muswell-hill. As the race for the Grand Prize was

decided, looking down from the gallery of the stand, I observed a sudden

commotion amongst the perspiring, bawling, leather-lunged gentry, who

seek whom they may devour, in the betting-ring below, and presently there

arose the magical cry of “Welsher!” I have heard the sudden cry of

“Fire!” raised in the night, and watched its thrilling, rousing effect on

the population; but that was as nothing compared with it. Instantly, and

as though moved by one deadly hate and thirst for vengeance, a rush was

made towards a man in a black wide-awake cap, and with the regular

betting-man’s pouch slung at his side, and who was hurrying towards the

gate of the enclosure. “Welsher! welsher!” cried the furious mob of the

ring, making at the poor wretch; and in an instant a dozen fists were

directed at his head and face, and he was struck down; but he was a

biggish man and strong, and he was quickly on his legs, to be again

struck down and kicked and stamped on. He was up again, however, without

his hat, and with his face a hideous patch of crimson, and hustled

towards the gate, plunging like a madman to escape the fury of his

pursuers; but the policeman blocked the way, and they caught him again,

and some punched at his face, while others tore off his clothes. One

ruffian—I cannot otherwise describe him—plucked at the poor devil’s shirt

at the breast, and tore away a tattered handful of it, which he flung

over to the great yelling crowd now assembled without the rails; another

tore away his coat-sleeves, and tossed them aloft; and in the same way he

lost his waistcoat and one of his boots. It seemed as though, if they

detained him another moment, the man must be murdered, and so the

policeman made way for him to escape.

From the frying-pan into the fire. “Welsher! welsher!” The air rang

with the hateful word, and, rushing from the gate, he was at once

snatched at by the foremost men of the mouthing, yelling mob outside, who

flung him down and punched and beat him. Fighting for his life, he

struggled and broke away, and ran; but a betting-man flung his tall stool

at him, and brought him to earth again for the twentieth time, and again

the punching and kicking process was resumed. How he escaped from these

was a miracle, but escape he did; and with the desperation of a rat

pursued by dogs, dived into an empty hansom cab, and there lay crouched

while fifty coward hands were stretched forward to drag him out, or,

failing in that, to prog and poke at him with walking-sticks and

umbrellas. At last, a mounted policeman spurred his horse forward and

came to the rescue, keeping his steed before the place of refuge. Then

the furious mob, that was not to be denied, turned on the policeman, and

only his great courage and determination saved him from being unhorsed

and ill-treated. Then other police came up, and the poor tattered

wretch, ghastly, white, and streaming with blood, was hauled out and

dragged away insensible, with his head hanging and his legs trailing in

the dust, amid the howling and horrible execrations of five thousand

Englishmen.

The next consideration was what to do with him. To convey him off the

premises was impossible, since a space of nearly a quarter of a mile had

to be traversed ere the outer gate could be reached. There was no

“lock-up” at the new grand stand, as at Epsom and elsewhere. Nothing

remained but to hustle him through a trap-door, and convey him by an

underground route to a cellar, in which empty bottles were deposited.

And grateful indeed must have been the stillness and the coolness of such

a sanctuary after the fierce ordeal he had so recently undergone.

Whether water was supplied him to wash his wounds, or if a doctor was

sent for, is more than I can say. There he was allowed to remain till

night, when he slunk home; and within a few days afterwards a local

newspaper briefly announced that the “unfortunate man, who had so rashly

roused the fury of the sporting fraternity at Alexandra races, was dead”!

To a close observer of the system that rules at all great horseracing

meetings, nothing is so remarkable as the child-like reliance with which

the general public intrusts its bettings to the keeping of the

“professionals,” who there swarm in attendance. In the case of the

bettors of the “ring” they may be tolerably safe, since it is to the

interest of all that the atmosphere of that sacred enclosure, only to be

gained at the cost of half-a-guinea or so, should be kept passably sweet.

Besides, as was mentioned in the case of the unfortunate “welsher” at

Alexandra races, the said enclosure is bounded by high railings; and the

salutary effect of catching and killing a “welsher” is universally

acknowledged. As regards the betting men themselves, it enables them to

give vent to reckless ferocity that naturally waits on disappointed

greed, while the public at large are impressed with the fact that strict

principles of honour amongst gamblers really do prevail, whatever may

have been said to the contrary. But at all the principal races the

greatest number of bets, if not the largest amounts of money, are risked

outside the magic circle. It is here that the huckster and small pedlar

of the betting fraternity conjure with the holiday-making shoemaker or

carpenter for his half-crown. For the thousandth time one cannot help

expressing amazement that men who have to work so hard for their

money—shrewd, hard-headed, sensible fellows as a rule—should part with it

on so ludicrously flimsy a pretext. Here—all amongst the refreshment

bustle, from which constantly streamed men hot from the beer and spirit

counters—swarmed hundreds of these betting harpies; some in carts, but

the majority of them perched on a stool, each with a bit of paper, on

which some name was printed, stuck on his hat, and with a money-bag slung

at his side, and a pencil and a handful of tickets. This was all. As

often as not the name and address on the betting man’s hat or money-bag

was vaguely expressed as “S. Pipes, Nottingham,” or “John Brown,

Oxford-street;” and who Pipes or Brown was not one man in a thousand had

the least idea. Nor did they inquire, the silly gulls. It was enough

for them they saw a man on a stool, ostensibly a “betting man,” bawling

out at the top of his great, vulgar, slangy voice what odds he was

prepared to lay on this, that, or t’other; and they flocked round—enticed

by terms too good to be by any possibility true, if they only were cool

enough to consider for a moment—and eagerly tendered to the rogue on the

stool their crowns and half-crowns, receiving from the strange Mr. Pipes

or Mr. Brown nothing in exchange but a paltry little ticket with a number

on it. This, for the present, concluded the transaction; and off went

the acceptor of the betting man’s odds to see the race on which the stake

depended. In very many cases the exchange of the little ticket for the

money concluded the transaction, not only for the present, but for all

future; for, having plucked all the gulls that could be caught, nothing

is easier than for Pipes to exchange hats with Brown and to shift their

places; and the pretty pair may with impunity renounce all

responsibility, and open a book on the next race on the programme. To be

sure it is hard to find patience with silly people who _will_ walk into a

well; and when they follow the workings of their own free will, it is

scarcely too much to say they are not to be pitied. But when a cheat or

sharper is permitted standing room that he may pursue his common

avocation, which is to cheat and plunder the unwary public, the matter

assumes a slightly different complexion.

Of all manner of advertising betting gamblers, however, none are so

pernicious, or work such lamentable evil against society, as those who,

with devilish cunning, appeal to the young and inexperienced—the factory

lad and the youth of the counting-house or the shop. Does anyone doubt

if horseracing has attractions for those whose tender age renders it

complimentary to style them “young men”? Let him on the day of any great

race convince himself. Let him make a journey on the afternoon of

“Derby-day,” for instance, to Fleet-street or the Strand, where the

offices of the sporting newspapers are situated. It may not be generally

known that the proprietors of the _Sunday Times_, _Bell’s Life_, and

other journals of a sporting tendency, in their zeal to outdo each other

in presenting the earliest possible information to the public, are at the

trouble and expense of securing the earliest possible telegram of the

result of a horserace, and exhibiting it enlarged on a broad-sheet in

their shop-windows. Let us take the _Sunday Times_, for instance. The

office of this most respectable of sporting newspapers is situated near

the corner of Fleet-street, at Ludgate-hill; and wonderful is the

spectacle there to be seen on the afternoon of the great equine contest

on Epsom downs. On a small scale, and making allowance for the absence

of the living provocatives of excitement, the scene is a reproduction of

what at that moment, or shortly since, has taken place on the racecourse

itself. Three o’clock is about the time the great race is run at Epsom,

and at that time the Fleet-street crowd begins to gather. It streams in

from the north, from the east, from the south. At a glance it is evident

that the members of it are not idly curious merely. It is not composed

of ordinary pedestrians who happen to be coming that way. Butcher-lads,

from the neighbouring great meat-market, come bareheaded and perspiring

down Ludgate-hill, and at a pace that tells how exclusively their eager

minds are set on racing: all in blue working-smocks, and with the grease

and blood of their trade adhering to their naked arms, and to their

hob-nailed boots, and to their hair. Hot and palpitating they reach the

obelisk in the middle of the road, and there they take their stand, with

their eyes steadfastly fixed on that at present blank and innocent window

that shall presently tell them of their fate.

I mention the butcher-boys first, because, for some unknown reason, they

undoubtedly are foremost in the rank of juvenile bettors. In the days

when the Fleet-lane betting abomination as yet held out against the

police authorities, and day after day a narrow alley behind the squalid

houses there served as standing room for as many “professional” betting

men, with their boards and money-pouches, as could crowd in a row, an

observer standing at one end of the lane might count three blue frocks

for one garment of any other colour. But though butcher-boys show

conspicuously among the anxious Fleet-street rush on a Derby-day, they

are not in a majority by a long way. To bet on the “Derby” is a mania

that afflicts all trades; and streaming up Farringdon-street may he seen

representatives of almost every craft that practises within the City’s

limits. There is the inky printer’s-boy, hot from the “machine-room,”

with his grimy face and his cap made of a ream wrapper; there is the

jeweller’s apprentice, with his bibbed white apron, ruddy with the powder

of rouge and borax; and the paper-stainer’s lad, with the variegated

splashes of the pattern of his last “length” yet wet on his ragged

breeches; and a hundred others, all hurrying pell-mell to the one spot,

and, in nine cases out of ten, with the guilt of having “slipped out”

visible on their streaming faces. Take their ages as they congregate in

a crowd of five hundred and more (they are expected in such numbers that

special policemen are provided to keep the roadway clear), and it will be

found that more than half are under the age of eighteen. Furthermore, it

must be borne in mind that in the majority of cases a single lad

represents a score or more employed in one “office” or factory. They

cast lots who shall venture on the unlawful mission, and it has fallen on

him. Again, and as before mentioned, the _Sunday Times_ is but one of

ten or a dozen sporting newspapers published between Ludgate-hill and St.

Clement Danes; and in the vicinity of every office may be met a similar

crowd. Let the reader bear these facts in mind, and he may arrive at

some faint idea of the prevalence of the horse-gambling evil amongst the

rising generation.

The significance of these various facts is plain to the advertising

tipster, and he shapes his baits accordingly. He never fails to mention,

in apprising his youthful admirers, that, in exchange for the last “good

thing,” postage-stamps will be taken. Well enough the cunning

unscrupulous villain knows that in the commercial world postage-stamps

are articles of very common use, and that at many establishments they are

dealt out carelessly, and allowed to lie about in drawers and desks for

the “common use.” There is temptation ready to hand! “Send fourteen

stamps to Dodger, and receive in return the _certain_ tip as to who will

win the Derby.” There are the stamps, and the ink, and the pen, and the

envelope, and nothing remains but to apply them to the use Dodger

suggests. It is not stealing, at least it does not seem like stealing,

this tearing fourteen stamps from a sheet at which everybody in the

office has access, and which will be replaced without question as soon as

it is exhausted. It is at most only “cribbing.” What is the difference

between writing a private note on the office paper and appropriating a

few paltry stamps? It would be different if the fourteenpence was in

hard money—a shilling and two penny-pieces. No young bookkeeper with any

pretensions to honesty would be guilty of stealing _money_ from his

master’s office—but a few stamps! Dodger knows this well enough, and

every morning quite a bulky parcel of crummy-feeling letters are

delivered at his residence in some back street in the Waterloo-road.

This is the way that Dodger angles for “flat-fish” of tender age:

“GREAT RESULTS FROM SMALL EFFORTS!—In order to meet the requirements

of those of humble means, W. W—n, of Tavistock-street, is prepared to

receive small sums for investment on the forthcoming great events.

Sums as low as two-and-sixpence in stamps (uncut) may be sent to the

above address, and they will be invested with due regard to our

patron’s interest. Recollect that at the present time there are Real

Good things in the market at 100 to 1, and that even so small a sum

put on such will return the speculator twelve pounds ten shillings,

less ten per cent commission, which is Mr. W.’s charge.”

“Faint heart never won a fortune! It is on record that the most

renowned Leviathan of the betting world began his career as

third-hand in a butcher’s shop! He had a ‘fancy’ for a horse, and

was so strongly impressed with the idea that it would win, that he

begged and borrowed every farthing he could raise, and even pawned

the coat off his back! His pluck and resolution was nobly rewarded.

The horse he backed was at 70 to 1, and he found himself after the

race the owner of nearly a thousand pounds! Bear this in mind.

There are as good fish in the sea as ever came out of it. Lose no

time in forwarding fourteen stamps to Alpha, John-street, Nottingham;

and wait the happy result.”

What is this but a plain and unmistakable intimation, on the part of the

advertising blackguard, that his dupes should _stick at nothing_ to raise

money to bet on the “forthcoming great event”? Pawn, beg,

borrow—_anything_, only don’t let the chance slip. Butcher-boys, think

of the luck of your Leviathan craftsman, and at once take the coat off

your back, or if you have not a garment good enough, your master’s coat

out of the clothes-closet, and hasten to pawn it. Never fear for the

happy result. Long before he can miss it, you will be able to redeem it,

besides being in a position to snap your fingers at him, and, if you

please, to start on your own “hook” as a bookmaker.

Another of these “youths’ guide to the turf” delicately points out that,

if bettors will only place themselves in his hands, he will “pull them

through, and land them high and dry,” certainly and surely, and with a

handsome return for their investments. “No knowledge of racing matters

is requisite on the part of the investor,” writes this quack; “indeed, as

in all other business affairs of life, ‘a little knowledge is a dangerous

thing.’ Better trust _entirely_ to one who has made it the one study of

his existence, and can read off the pedigree and doings of every horse

that for the past ten years has run for money. Large investments are not

recommended. Indeed, the beginner should in no case ‘put on’ more than a

half-sovereign, and as low as half-a-crown will often be sufficient, and

in the hands of a practised person like the advertiser be made to go as

far as an injudiciously invested pound or more.”

It would be interesting to know in how many instances these vermin of the

betting-field are successful, how many of them there are who live by

bleeding the simple and the infatuated, and what sort of living it is.

Not a very luxurious one, it would seem, judging from the shady quarters

of the town from which the “tipster” usually hails; but then we have to

bear in mind the venerable maxim, “Light come, light go,” and its

probable application to those harpies who hanker after “uncut” stamps and

receive them in thousands. That very many of them find it a game worth

pursuing, there can be no doubt, or they would not so constantly resort

to the advertising columns of the newspapers. How much mischief they

really do, one can never learn. The newspaper announcement is, of

course, but a preliminary to further business: you send your stamps, and

what you in most cases get in return is not the information for which you

imagined you were bargaining, but a “card of terms” of the tipster’s

method of doing business. There is nothing new or novel in this. It is

an adaptation of the ancient dodge of the medical quack who advertises a

“certain cure” for “all the ills that flesh is heir to,” on receipt of

seven postage-stamps; but all that you receive for your sevenpence is a

printed recipe for the concoction of certain stuffs, “to be had only” of

the advertiser.

And well would it be for the gullible public if the mischief done by the

advertising fraternity of horse-racing quacks was confined to the

“fourteen uncut stamps” they have such an insatiable hunger for. There

can be no doubt, however, that this is but a mild and inoffensive branch

of their nefarious profession. In almost every case they combine with

the exercise of their supernatural gift of prophecy the matter-of-fact

business of the “commission agent,” and, if rumour whispers true, they

make of it at times a business as infernal in its working as can well be

imagined. They can, when occasion serves, be as “accommodating” as the

loan-office swindler or the 60-per-cent bill-discounter, and a profit

superior to that yielded by either of these avocations may be realised,

and that with scarce any trouble at all. No capital is required,

excepting a considerable stock of impudence and a fathomless fund of

cold-blooded rascality.

Judging from the fact that the species of villany in question has never

yet been exposed in a police-court, it is only fair to imagine that it is

a modern invention; on that account I am the more anxious to record and

make public an item of evidence bearing on the subject that, within the

past year, came under my own observation.

It can be scarcely within the year, though, for it was at the time when

an audacious betting gang “squatted” in the vicinity of Ludgate-hill,

and, owing to some hitch in the law’s machinery, they could not easily be

removed. First they swarmed in Bride-lane, Fleet-street. Being

compelled to “move on,” they migrated to a most appropriate site, the

waste land on which for centuries stood the infamous houses of Field-lane

and West-street, and beneath which flowed the filthy Fleet-ditch. But

even this was accounted ground too good to be desecrated by the foot of

the gambling blackleg, and they were one fine morning bundled off it by a

strong body of City police. After this they made a desperate stand on

the prison side of the way in Farringdon-street, and for some months

there remained.

It was at this time that I made the acquaintance of the subject of the

present little story. I had noticed him repeatedly, with his pale

haggard face and his dull eyes, out of which nothing but weariness of

life looked. He was a tall slim young fellow, and wore his patched and

seedy clothes as though he had been used to better attire; and, despite

the tell-tale shabbiness of his boots and his wretched tall black hat, he

still clung to the respectable habit of wearing black kid-gloves, though

it was necessary to shut his fists to hide the dilapidations at their

finger-tips.

He was not remarkable amongst the betting blackguards he mingled with on

account of the active share he took in the questionable business in which

they were engaged; on the contrary, he seemed quite out of place with

them, and though occasionally one would patronise him with a nod, it was

evident that he was “nothing to them,” either as a comrade or a gull to

be plucked. He appeared to be drawn towards them by a fascination he

could not resist, but which he deplored and was ashamed of. It was

customary in those times for the prosperous horse-betting gambler to

affect the genteel person who could afford to keep a “man,” and to press

into his service some poor ragged wretch glad to earn a sixpence by

wearing his master’s “card of terms” round his neck for the inspection of

any person inclined to do business. The tall shabby young fellow’s chief

occupation consisted in wandering restlessly from one of these

betting-card bearers to another, evidently with a view to comparing

“prices” and “odds” offered on this or that horse; but he never bet. I

don’t believe that his pecuniary affairs would have permitted him, even

though a bet as low as twopence-halfpenny might be laid.

I was always on the look-out for my miserable-looking young friend

whenever I passed that way, and seldom failed to find him. He seemed to

possess for me a fascination something like that which horse-betting

possessed for him. One afternoon, observing him alone and looking even

more miserable than I had yet seen him, as he slouched along the miry

pavement towards Holborn, I found means to start a conversation with him.

My object was to learn who and what he was, and whether he was really as

miserable as he looked, and whether there was any help for him. I was

prepared to exercise all the ingenuity at my command to compass this

delicate project, but he saved me the trouble. As though he was glad of

the chance of doing so, before we were half-way up Holborn-hill he turned

the conversation exactly into the desired groove, and by the time the

Tottenham-court-road was reached (he turned down there), I knew even more

of his sad history than is here subjoined.

“What is the business pursuit that takes me amongst the betting-men? O

no, sir, I’m not at all astonished that you should ask the question; I’ve

asked it of myself so often, that it doesn’t come new to me. I pursue no

business, sir. What business _could_ a wretched scarecrow like I am

pursue? Say that _I_ am pursued, and you will be nearer the mark.

Pursued by what I can never get away from or shake off: damn it!”

He uttered the concluding wicked word with such decisive and bitter

emphasis, that I began to think that he had done with the subject; but he

began again almost immediately.

“I wish to the Lord I had a business pursuit! If ever a fellow was tired

of his life, I am. Well—yes, I _am_ a young man; but it’s precious small

consolation that that fact brings me. Hang it, no! All the longer to

endure it. How long have I endured it? Ah, now you come to the point.

For years, you think, I daresay. You look at me, and you think to

yourself, ‘There goes a poor wretch who has been on the downhill road so

long that it’s time that he came to the end of it, or made an end to it.’

There you are mistaken. Eighteen months ago I was well dressed and

prosperous. I was second clerk to —, the provision merchants, in St.

Mary Axe, on a salary of a hundred and forty pounds—rising twenty each

year. Now look at me!

“You need not ask me how it came about. You say that you have seen me

often in Farringdon-street with the betting-men, so you can give a good

guess as to how I came to ruin, I’ll be bound. Yes, sir, it was

horse-betting that did my business. No, I did not walk to ruin with my

eyes open, and because I liked the road. I was trapped into it, sir, as

I’ll be bound scores and scores of young fellows have been. I never had

a passion for betting. I declare that, till within the last two years, I

never made a bet in my life. The beginning of it was, that, for the fun

of the thing, I wagered ten shillings with a fellow-clerk about the Derby

that was just about to come off. I never took any interest in

horseracing before; but when I had made that bet I was curious to look

over the sporting news, and to note the odds against the favourite. One

unlucky day I was fool enough to answer the advertisement of a

professional tipster. He keeps the game going still, curse him! You may

read his name in the papers this morning. If I wasn’t such an infernal

coward, you know, I should kill that man. If I hadn’t the money to buy a

pistol, I ought to steal one, and shoot the thief. But, what do you

think? I met him on Monday, and he chaffed me about my boots. It was

raining at the time. ‘I wish I had a pair of waterproofs like yours,

Bobby. You’ll never take cold while they let all the water out at the

heel they take in at the toe!’ Fancy me standing _that_ after the way he

had served me! Fancy this too—me borrowing a shilling of him, and saying

‘Thank you, sir,’ for it! Why, you know, I ought to be pumped on for

doing it!

“Yes, I wrote to ‘Robert B—y, Esq., of Leicester,’ and sent the

half-crown’s worth of stamps asked for. It doesn’t matter what I got in

return. Anyhow, it was something that set my mind on betting, and I

wrote again and again. At first his replies were of a distant and

business sort; but in a month or so after I had written to him to

complain of being misguided by him, he wrote back a friendly note to say

that he wasn’t at all surprised to hear of my little failures—novices

always did fail. They absurdly attempt what they did not understand.

‘Just to show you the difference,’ said he, ‘just give me a commission to

invest a pound for you on the Ascot Cup. All that I charge is seven and

a half per cent on winnings. Try it just for once; a pound won’t break

you, and it may open your eyes to the way that fortunes are made.’ I

ought to have known then, that either he, or somebody in London he had

set on, had been making inquiries about me, for the other notes were sent

to where mine were directed from—my private lodgings—but this one came to

me at the warehouse.

“Well, I sent the pound, and within a week received a post-office order

for four pounds eight as the result of its investment. The same week I

bet again—two pounds this time—and won one pound fifteen. That was over

six pounds between Monday and Saturday. ‘This _is_ the way that fortunes

are made,’ I laughed to myself, like a fool.

“Well, he kept me going, I don’t exactly recollect how, between Ascot and

Goodwood, which is about seven weeks, not more. Sometimes I won,

sometimes I lost, but, on the whole, I was in pocket. I was such a fool

at last, that I was always for betting more than he advised. I’ve got

his letters at home now, in which he says, ‘Pray don’t be rash; take my

advice, and bear in mind that great risks mean great losses, as well as

great gains, at times.’ Quite fatherly, you know! The infernal

scoundrel!

“Well, one day there came a telegram to the office for me. I was just in

from my dinner. It was from B—y. ‘Now you may bag a hundred pounds at a

shot,’ said he. ‘The odds are short, but the result _certain_. Never

mind the money just now. You are a gentleman, and I will trust you. You

know that my motto has all along been ‘Caution.’ Now it is ‘Go in and

win.’ It is _sure_. Send me a word immediately, or it may be too late;

and, if you are wise, put a ‘lump’ on it.’

“That was the infernal document—the death-warrant of all my good

prospects. It was the rascal’s candour that deceived me. He had all

along said, ‘Be cautious, don’t be impatient to launch out;’ and now this

patient careful villain saw his chance, and advised, ‘Go in and win.’ I

was quite in a maze at the prospect of bagging a hundred pounds. To win

that sum the odds were so short on the horse he mentioned, that fifty

pounds had to be risked. But he said that there was _no_ risk, and I

believed him. I sent him back a telegram at once to execute the

commission.

“The horse lost. I knew it next morning before I was up, for I had sent

for the newspaper; and while I was in the midst of my fright, up comes my

landlady to say that a gentleman of the name of B—y wished to see me.

“I had never seen him before, and he seemed an easy fellow enough. He

was in a terrible way—chiefly on my account—though the Lord only knew how

much _he_ had lost over the ‘sell.’ He had come up by express purely to

relieve my anxiety, knowing how ‘funky’ young gentlemen sometimes were

over such trifles. Although he had really paid the fifty in hard gold

out of his pocket, he was in no hurry for it. He would take my bill at

two months. It would be all right, no doubt. He had conceived a liking

for me, merely from my straightforward way of writing. Now that he had

had the pleasure of seeing me, he shouldn’t trouble himself a fig if the

fifty that I owed him was five hundred.

“I declare to you that I knew so little about bills, that I didn’t know

how to draw one out; but I was mighty glad to be shown the way and to

give it him, and thank him over and over again for his kindness. That

was the beginning of my going to the devil. If I hadn’t been a fool, I

might have saved myself even then, for I had friends who would have lent

or given me twice fifty pounds if I had asked them for it. But I _was_ a

fool. In the course of a day or two I got a note from B—y, reminding me

that the way out of the difficulty was by the same path as I had got into

one, and that a little judicious ‘backing’ would set me right before even

my bill fell due. And I was fool enough to walk into the snare. I

wouldn’t borrow to pay the fifty pounds, but I borrowed left and right,

of my mother, of my brothers, on all manner of lying pretences, to follow

the ‘advice’ B—y was constantly sending me. When I came to the end of

their forbearance, I did more than borrow; but that we won’t speak of.

In five months from the beginning, I was without a relative who would own

me or speak to me, and without an employer—cracked up, ruined. And

there’s B—y, as I said before, with his white hat cocked on one side of

his head, and his gold toothpick, chaffing me about my old boots. What

do I do for a living? Well, I’ve told you such a precious lot, I may as

well tell you that too. Where I lodge it’s a ‘leaving-shop,’ and the old

woman that keeps it can’t read or write, and I keep her ‘book’ for her.

That’s how I get a bit of breakfast and supper and a bed to lie on.”

[Since the above was written, the police, under the energetic guidance of

their new chief, have been making vigorous and successful warfare against

public gamblers and gambling agents. The “spec” dodge has been

annihilated, “betting-shops” have been entered and routed, and there is

even fair promise that the worst feature of the bad business, that which

takes refuge behind the specious cloak of the “commission-agent,” may be

put down. That it may be so, should be the earnest wish of all

right-thinking men, who would break down this barrier of modern and

monstrous growth, that blocks the advancement of social purity, and

causes perhaps more ruin and irreparable dismay than any other two of the

Curses herein treated of.]

VII.—Waste of Charity.

The seven curses of London · 第 22 / 24 章