It is the merest electioneering trick to say that the war has been

turned from its original intention, as if this implied that a cheat had

thereby been put upon the country. The truth is, that the popular

understanding has been gradually enlightened as to the real causes of

the war, and, in consequence of that enlightenment, a purpose has grown

up, defining itself slowly into clearer consciousness, to finish the

war in the only way that will keep it finished, by rooting out the evil

principle from which it sprang. The country has been convinced that a

settlement which should stop short of this would be nothing more than a

truce favorable only to the weaker party in the struggle, to the very

criminals who forced it upon us. The single question is, Shall we have

peace by submission or by victory? General McClellan's election insures

the one, Mr. Lincoln's gives us our only chance of the other. It is

Slavery, and not the Southern people, that is our enemy; we must

conquer this to be at peace with them. With the relations of the

several States of the Rebel Confederacy to the Richmond government we

have nothing to do; but to say that, after being beaten as foreign

enemies, they are to resume their previous relations to our own

government as if nothing had happened, seems to us a manifest

absurdity. From whom would General McClellan, if elected under his plan

of conciliation, exact the penalties of rebellion? The States cannot be

punished, and the only merciful way in which we can reach the real

criminals is by that very policy of emancipation whose efficacy is

proved by the bitter opposition of all the allies of the Rebellion in

the North. This is a punishment which will not affect the independence

of individual States, which will improve the condition of the mass of

the Southern population, and which alone will remove the rock of

offence from the pathway of democratic institutions. So long as slavery

is left, there is antipathy between the two halves of the country, and

the recurrence of actual war will be only a question of time. It is the

nature of evil to be aggressive. Without moral force in itself, it is

driven, by the necessity of things, to seek material props. It cannot

make peace with truth, if it would. Good, on the other hand, is by its

very nature peaceful. Strong in itself, strong in the will of God and

the sympathy of man, its conquests are silent and beneficent as those

of summer, warming into life, and bringing to blossom and fruitage,

whatever is wholesome in men and the institutions of men.

ABRAHAM LINCOLN

1864-1865.

There have been many painful crises since the impatient vanity of South

Carolina hurried ten prosperous Commonwealths into a crime whose

assured retribution was to leave them either at the mercy of the nation

they had wronged, or of the anarchy they had summoned but could not

control, when no thoughtful American opened his morning paper without

dreading to find that he had no longer a country to love and honor.

Whatever the result of the convulsion whose first shocks were beginning

to be felt, there would still be enough square miles of earth for

elbow-room; but that ineffable sentiment made up of memory and hope, of

instinct and tradition, which swells every man's heart and shapes his

thought, though perhaps never present to his consciousness, would be

gone from it, leaving it common earth and nothing more. Men might

gather rich crops from it, but that ideal harvest of priceless

associations would be reaped no longer; that fine virtue which sent up

messages of courage and security from every sod of it would have

evaporated beyond recall. We should be irrevocably cut off from our

past, and be forced to splice the ragged ends of our lives upon

whatever new conditions chance might leave dangling for us.

We confess that we had our doubts at first whether the patriotism of

our people were not too narrowly provincial to embrace the proportions

of national peril. We felt an only too natural distrust of immense

public meetings and enthusiastic cheers.

That a reaction should follow the holiday enthusiasm with which the war

was entered on, that it should follow soon, and that the slackening of

public spirit should be proportionate to the previous over-tension,

might well be foreseen by all who had studied human nature or history.

Men acting gregariously are always in extremes. As they are one moment

capable of higher courage, so they are liable, the next, to baser

depression, and it is often a matter of chance whether numbers shall

multiply confidence or discouragement. Nor does deception lead more

surely to distrust of men than self-deception to suspicion of

principles. The only faith that wears well and holds its color in all

weathers is that which is woven of conviction and set with the sharp

mordant of experience. Enthusiasm is good material for the orator, but

the statesman needs something more durable to work in,--must be able to

rely on the deliberate reason and consequent firmness of the people,

without which that presence of mind, no less essential in times of

moral than of material peril, will be wanting at the critical moment.

Would this fervor of the Free States hold out? Was it kindled by a just

feeling of the value of constitutional liberty? Had it body enough to

withstand the inevitable dampening of checks, reverses, delays? Had our

population intelligence enough to comprehend that the choice was

between order and anarchy, between the equilibrium of a government by

law and the tussle of misrule by _pronunciamiento_? Could a war be

maintained without the ordinary stimulus of hatred and plunder, and

with the impersonal loyalty of principle? These were serious questions,

and with no precedent to aid in answering them.

[Illustration: _Abraham Lincoln_]

At the beginning of the war there was, indeed, occasion for the most

anxious apprehension. A President known to be infected with the

political heresies, and suspected of sympathy with the treason, of the

Southern conspirators, had just surrendered the reins, we will not say

of power, but of chaos, to a successor known only as the representative

of a party whose leaders, with long training in opposition, had none in

the conduct of affairs; an empty treasury was called on to supply

resources beyond precedent in the history of finance; the trees were

yet growing and the iron unmined with, which a navy was to be built and

armored; officers without discipline were to make a mob into an army;

and, above all, the public opinion of Europe, echoed and reinforced

with every vague hint and every specious argument of despondency by a

powerful faction at home, was either contemptuously sceptical or

actively hostile. It would be hard to over-estimate the force of this

latter element of disintegration and discouragement among a people

where every citizen at home, and every soldier in the field, is a

reader of newspapers. The pedlers of rumor in the North were the most

effective allies of the rebellion. A nation can be liable to no more

insidious treachery than that of the telegraph, sending hourly its

electric thrill of panic along the remotest nerves of the community,

till the excited imagination makes every real danger loom heightened

with its unreal double.

And even if we look only at more palpable difficulties, the problem to

be solved by our civil war was so vast, both in its immediate relations

and its future consequences; the conditions of its solution were so

intricate and so greatly dependent on incalculable and uncontrollable

contingencies; so many of the data, whether for hope or fear, were,

from their novelty, incapable of arrangement under any of the

categories of historical precedent, that there were moments of crisis

when the firmest believer in the strength and sufficiency of the

democratic theory of government might well hold his breath in vague

apprehension of disaster. Our teachers of political philosophy,

solemnly arguing from the precedent of some petty Grecian, Italian, or

Flemish city, whose long periods of aristocracy were broken now and

then by awkward parentheses of mob, had always taught us that

democracies were incapable of the sentiment of loyalty, of concentrated

and prolonged effort, of far-reaching conceptions; were absorbed in

material interests; impatient of regular, and much more of exceptional

restraint; had no natural nucleus of gravitation, nor any forces but

centrifugal; were always on the verge of civil war, and slunk at last

into the natural almshouse of bankrupt popular government, a military

despotism. Here was indeed a dreary outlook for persons who knew

democracy, not by rubbing shoulders with it lifelong, but merely from

books, and America only by the report of some fellow-Briton, who,

having eaten a bad dinner or lost a carpet-bag here, had written to the

"Times" demanding redress, and drawing a mournful inference of

democratic instability. Nor were men wanting among ourselves who had so

steeped their brains in London literature as to mistake Cockneyism for

European culture, and contempt of their country for cosmopolitan

breadth of view, and who, owing all they had and all they were to

democracy, thought it had an air of high-breeding to join in the

shallow epicedium that our bubble had burst.

But beside any disheartening influences which might affect the timid or

the despondent, there were reasons enough of settled gravity against

any over-confidence of hope. A war--which, whether we consider the

expanse of the territory at stake, the hosts brought into the field, or

the reach of the principles involved, may fairly be reckoned the most

momentous of modern times--was to be waged by a people divided at home,

unnerved by fifty years of peace, under a chief magistrate without

experience and without reputation, whose every measure was sure to be

cunningly hampered by a jealous and unscrupulous minority, and who,

while dealing with unheard-of complications at home, must soothe a

hostile neutrality abroad, waiting only a pretext to become war. All

this was to be done without warning and without preparation, while at

the same time a social revolution was to be accomplished in the

political condition of four millions of people, by softening the

prejudices, allaying the fears, and gradually obtaining the

cooperation, of their unwilling liberators. Surely, if ever there were

an occasion when the heightened imagination of the historian might see

Destiny visibly intervening in human affairs, here was a knot worthy of

her shears. Never, perhaps, was any system of government tried by so

continuous and searching a strain as ours during the last three years;

never has any shown itself stronger; and never could that strength be

so directly traced to the virtue and intelligence of the people,--to

that general enlightenment and prompt efficiency of public opinion

possible only under the influence of a political framework like our

own. We find it hard to understand how even a foreigner should be blind

to the grandeur of the combat of ideas that has been going on here,--to

the heroic energy, persistency, and self-reliance of a nation proving

that it knows how much dearer greatness is than mere power; and we own

that it is impossible for us to conceive the mental and moral condition

of the American who does not feel his spirit braced and heightened by

being even a spectator of such qualities and achievements. That a

steady purpose and a definite aim have been given to the jarring forces

which, at the beginning of the war, spent themselves in the discussion

of schemes which could only become operative, if at all, after the war

was over; that a popular excitement has been slowly intensified into an

earnest national will; that a somewhat impracticable moral sentiment

has been made the unconscious instrument of a practical moral end; that

the treason of covert enemies, the jealousy of rivals, the unwise zeal

of friends, have been made not only useless for mischief, but even

useful for good; that the conscientious sensitiveness of England to the

horrors of civil conflict has been prevented from complicating a

domestic with a foreign war;--all these results, any one of which might

suffice to prove greatness in a ruler, have been mainly due to the good

sense, the good-humor, the sagacity, the large--mindedness, and the

unselfish honesty of the unknown man whom a blind fortune, as it

seemed, had lifted from the crowd to the most dangerous and difficult

eminence of modern times. It is by presence of mind in untried

emergencies that the native metal of a man is tested; it is by the

sagacity to see, and the fearless honesty to admit, whatever of truth

there may be in an adverse opinion, in order more convincingly to

expose the fallacy that lurks behind it, that a reasoner at length

gains for his mere statement of a fact the force of argument; it is by

a wise forecast which allows hostile combinations to go so far as by

the inevitable reaction to become elements of his own power, that a

politician proves his genius for state-craft; and especially it is by

so gently guiding public sentiment that he seems to follow it, by so

yielding doubtful points that he can be firm without seeming obstinate

in essential ones, and thus gain the advantages of compromise without

the weakness of concession; by so instinctively comprehending the

temper and prejudices of a people as to make them gradually conscious

of the superior wisdom of his freedom from temper and prejudice,--it is

by qualities such as these that a magistrate shows himself worthy to be

chief in a commonwealth of freemen. And it is for qualities such as

these that we firmly believe History will rank Mr. Lincoln among the

most prudent of statesmen and the most successful of rulers. If we wish

to appreciate him, we have only to conceive the inevitable chaos in

which we should now be weltering, had a weak man or an unwise one been

chosen in his stead.

"Bare is back," says the Norse proverb, "without brother behind it";

and this is, by analogy, true of an elective magistracy. The hereditary

ruler in any critical emergency may reckon on the inexhaustible

resources of _prestige_, of sentiment, of superstition, of dependent

interest, while the new man must slowly and painfully create all these

out of the unwilling material around him, by superiority of character,

by patient singleness of purpose, by sagacious presentiment of popular

tendencies and instinctive sympathy with the national character. Mr.

Lincoln's task was one of peculiar and exceptional difficulty. Long

habit had accustomed the American people to the notion of a party in

power, and of a President as its creature and organ, while the more

vital fact, that the executive for the time being represents the

abstract idea of government as a permanent principle superior to all

party and all private interest, had gradually become unfamiliar. They

had so long seen the public policy more or less directed by views of

party, and often even of personal advantage, as to be ready to suspect

the motives of a chief magistrate compelled, for the first time in our

history, to feel himself the head and hand of a great nation, and to

act upon the fundamental maxim, laid down by all publicists, that the

first duty of a government is to defend and maintain its own existence.

Accordingly, a powerful weapon seemed to be put into the hands of the

opposition by the necessity under which the administration found itself

of applying this old truth to new relations. Nor were the opposition

his only nor his most dangerous opponents.

The Republicans had carried the country upon an issue in which ethics

were more directly and visibly mingled with politics than usual. Their

leaders were trained to a method of oratory which relied for its effect

rather on the moral sense than the understanding. Their arguments were

drawn, not so much from experience as from general principles of right

and wrong. When the war came, their system continued to be applicable

and effective, for here again the reason of the people was to be

reached and kindled through their sentiments. It was one of those

periods of excitement, gathering, contagious, universal, which, while

they last, exalt and clarify the minds of men, giving to the mere words

_country_, _human rights_, _democracy_, a meaning and a force beyond

that of sober and logical argument. They were convictions, maintained

and defended by the supreme logic of passion. That penetrating fire ran

in and roused those primary instincts that make their lair in the dens

and caverns of the mind. What is called the great popular heart was

awakened, that indefinable something which may be, according to

circumstances, the highest reason or the most brutish unreason. But

enthusiasm, once cold, can never be warmed over into anything better

than cant,--and phrases, when once the inspiration that filled them

with beneficent power has ebbed away, retain only that semblance of

meaning which enables them to supplant reason in hasty minds. Among the

lessons taught by the French Revolution there is none sadder or more

striking than this, that you may make everything else out of the

passions of men except a political system that will work, and that

there is nothing so pitilessly and unconsciously cruel as sincerity

formulated into dogma. It is always demoralizing to extend the domain

of sentiment over questions where it has no legitimate jurisdiction;

and perhaps the severest strain upon Mr. Lincoln was in resisting a

tendency of his own supporters which chimed with his own private

desires, while wholly opposed to his convictions of what would be wise

policy.

The change which three years have brought about is too remarkable to be

passed over without comment, too weighty in its lesson not to be laid

to heart. Never did a President enter upon office with less means at

his command, outside his own strength of heart and steadiness of

understanding, for inspiring confidence in the people, and so winning

it for himself, than Mr. Lincoln. All that was known of him was that he

was a good stump-speaker, nominated for his _availability_,--that is,

because he had no history,--and chosen by a party with whose more

extreme opinions he was not in sympathy. It might well be feared that a

man past fifty, against whom the ingenuity of hostile partisans could

rake up no accusation, must be lacking in manliness of character, in

decision of principle, in strength of will; that a man who was at best

only the representative of a party, and who yet did not fairly

represent even that, would fail of political, much more of popular,

support. And certainly no one ever entered upon office with so few

resources of power in the past, and so many materials of weakness in

the present, as Mr. Lincoln. Even in that half of the Union which

acknowledged him as President, there was a large and at that time

dangerous minority, that hardly admitted his claim to the office, and

even in the party that elected him there was also a large minority that

suspected him of being secretly a communicant with the church of

Laodicea. All that he did was sure to be virulently attacked as ultra

by one side; all that he left undone, to be stigmatized as proof of

lukewarmness and backsliding by the other. Meanwhile, he was to carry

on a truly colossal war by means of both; he was to disengage the

country from diplomatic entanglements of unprecedented peril

undisturbed by the help or the hindrance of either, and to win from the

crowning dangers of his administration, in the confidence of the

people, the means of his safety and their own. He has contrived to do

it, and perhaps none of our Presidents since Washington has stood so

firm in the confidence of the people as he does after three years of

stormy administration.

Mr. Lincoln's policy was a tentative one, and rightly so. He laid down

no programme which must compel him to be either inconsistent or unwise,

no cast-iron theorem to which circumstances must be fitted as they

rose, or else be useless to his ends. He seemed to have chosen

Mazarin's motto, _Le temps et moi_. The _moi_ to be sure, was not very

prominent at first; but it has grown more and more so, till the world

is beginning to be persuaded that it stands for a character of marked

individuality and capacity for affairs. Time was his prime-minister,

and, we began to think, at one period, his general-in-chief also. At

first he was so slow that he tired out all those who see no evidence of

progress but in blowing up the engine; then he was so fast, that he

took the breath away from those who think there is no getting on safely

while there is a spark of fire under the boilers. God is the only being

who has time enough; but a prudent man, who knows how to seize

occasion, can commonly make a shift to find as much as he needs. Mr.

Lincoln, as it seems to us in reviewing his career, though we have

sometimes in our impatience thought otherwise, has always waited, as a

wise man should, till the right moment brought up all his reserves.

_Semper nocuit differre paratis_ is a sound axiom, but the really

efficacious man will also be sure to know when he is _not_ ready, and

be firm against all persuasion and reproach till he is.

One would be apt to think, from some of the criticisms made on Mr.

Lincoln's course by those who mainly agree with him in principle, that

the chief object of a statesman should be rather to proclaim his

adhesion to certain doctrines, than to achieve their triumph by quietly

accomplishing his ends. In our opinion, there is no more unsafe

politician than a conscientiously rigid _doctrinaire_, nothing more

sure to end in disaster than a theoretic scheme of policy that admits

of no pliability for contingencies. True, there is a popular image of

an impossible He, in whose plastic hands the submissive destinies of

mankind become as wax, and to whose commanding necessity the toughest

facts yield with the graceful pliancy of fiction; but in real life we

commonly find that the men who control circumstances, as it is called,

are those who have learned to allow for the influence of their eddies,

and have the nerve to turn them to account at the happy instant. Mr.

Lincoln's perilous task has been to carry a rather shaky raft through

the rapids, making fast the unrulier logs as he could snatch

opportunity, and the country is to be congratulated that he did not

think it his duty to run straight at all hazards, but cautiously to

assure himself with his setting-pole where the main current was, and

keep steadily to that. He is still in wild water, but we have faith

that his skill and sureness of eye will bring him out right at last.

The Writings of James Russell Lowell in Prose and Poetry, Volume V Political Essays · 第 11 / 20 段