IX.

_THE KING'S AMBASSADORS_.

MATT. ix. 36-x. 42.

I.--THE MISSION (ix. 36-x. 5).

So far the King Himself has done all the work of the kingdom. But it

has grown upon Him, so that He can no longer do it without assistance;

He must therefore provide Himself with deputies. His doing so will be

the first step in the organisation of His world-wide kingdom. He

reveals, however, no plan laid down to meet all possible emergencies.

It is enough to provide for necessities as they develop themselves. He

constructs no mechanism beforehand into the different parts of which

life may be afterwards guided or forced; His only care is about the

life, knowing well that if only this be full and strong, the

appropriate organisation will be ready when it is needed.

In conformity with this principle He does not make His arrangements,

necessary as they manifestly are, without first providing that they

shall not be mechanical but vital, that they shall originate, not as a

contrivance of mind but as an outflow of soul. First, we are informed

by the Evangelist that the soul of the Master Himself was stirred with

compassion as He looked upon the multitude, and thought how much they

needed in the way of shepherding, and how little it was possible for

them to have. It was no matter of planning for the extension of His

kingdom; it was a great yearning over the sheep that were scattered,

and torn (ver. 36, Gk. of oldest MSS.), and lost (x. 6). But it is not

enough that the Master's heart should be touched: the disciples also

must be moved. So He turns their thoughts in the same direction,

urging them to observe how plenteous the harvest, how few the

labourers; and therefore to pray that the lack may be speedily

supplied. He sets them thinking and praying about it--the only way to

lay foundations for that which shall be true and lasting. Let it be

observed further, that the two emblems He uses present most strikingly

the great motives to missionary work: compassion for the lost, and

zeal for the Divine glory. "Sheep having no shepherd,"--this appeals

to our human sympathies; the Lord of the harvest deprived of His

harvest for want of labourers to gather it in,--this appeals to our

love and loyalty to God.

The result of their thought and prayer presently appears; for we read

in the next sentence of the setting apart of the twelve disciples to

the work. It does not follow, because the narrative is continuous,

that the events recorded were; it is probable that an interval elapsed

which would be largely spent in prayer according to the word of the

Master.

This is the first mention of the Twelve in this Gospel; but it is

evident that the number had been already made up, for they are spoken

of as "His twelve disciples." It would appear from the second and

third Gospels that, immediately before the delivery of the Sermon on

the Mount, the Twelve were chosen from the whole number of disciples

to be constantly with Him, as witnesses of His works and learners of

His doctrine. By this time they had been so far instructed and trained

by their companionship with Christ, that they could be safely

entrusted with a mission by themselves; accordingly He for the first

time gives them power to do deeds of mercy of the same sort as those

which He Himself had been doing, as signs of the kingdom of heaven.

As the apostles have not been mentioned before, their names are

appropriately given here. The number "twelve" was no doubt

significant, as suggestive of the twelve tribes of Israel; but there

was plainly no attempt to have the tribes represented separately. It

would seem as if all were Galileans, except one, and that one was

Judas Iscariot (_i.e._, the man of Kerioth, supposed to be a town in

Judæa). The reason of this almost exclusive choice of Galileans is in

all probability to be found in the simple fact that there were none

other available. There had been those, in the course of His Judæan

ministry, who had after a certain fashion believed on Him; but there

was not one of them whom He could trust with such work as this (John

ii. 23-5). It may be thought, indeed, that surely there might have

been some better representative--at least, than Judas proved himself

to be--of the southern tribes; but why should we think so? We have no

reason to suppose that Judas was a traitor at heart when he was

chosen. Perhaps there was in him at that time the making of as grand

an apostle as the best of them. It was not long, indeed, before the

demon in him began to betray itself to the searching glance of the

Master (John vi. 70); but had he only, in the power of the Master he

followed, cast that demon out of his own heart, as possibly enough he

may have helped in this very mission to cast demons out of others,

all would have been well. The subsequent fall of the traitor does not

by any means show that Christ now made a mistaken choice; it only

shows that the highest privileges and opportunities may, by the

tolerance of sin in the heart, be not only all in vain, but may lead

to a condemnation and ruin more terrible by far than would have been

possible without them.

Not only was the apostolate Galilean,--it was plebeian, and that

without a solitary exception. It seems to include not a single person

of recognised rank or position. Again, we believe that this is to be

accounted for by the simple fact that there were none of these

available. We cannot suppose that if there had been a disciple like

Paul in the ranks, the Master would have hesitated to give him a place

in the sacred college; but, seeing there was none, He would not go out

of His way to secure a representative of the learned or the great. Had

Nicodemus been bold enough to come out decidedly on the Lord's side,

or had Joseph of Arimathæa developed earlier that splendid courage

which he showed when the Master's work on earth was done, we can

scarcely doubt that their names might have been included in the roll.

But there is no such name; and now, as we look back, was it not better

so? Otherwise there could not have been such a wonderful illustration

of the great fact that "God hath chosen the weak things of the world

to confound the things which are mighty"; there could not otherwise

have been the same invincible evidence that the work these men did was

not the work of men, but was indeed and in truth the doing of God.

Though they were all from the lower ranks of life, they were

characterised by great varieties of gifts and dispositions. Some of

them, indeed, are scarcely known to us at all. It may be that they

were more or less ordinary men who made no special mark; but it would

be rash to set this down as certain, or even as probable, seeing that

our records of the time are so scanty, and are manifestly constructed

with the idea, not of giving to every man his due--as would be the

poor ideal of a mere writer of history--but of making nothing of the

men, and everything of the cause and of the Master in Whose great

Personality theirs was merged. But those of them who do appear in the

records are men of such varied dispositions and powers that the Twelve

might after all have been a fair miniature of the Church at large.

Some of the selections seem very strange. We have already referred to

Judas the traitor. But there were those among them who must have been

far less likely men than he. There were two in particular, the choice

of whom seemed to violate all dictates of wisdom and prudence. These

were Matthew the publican and Simon the Cananæan or Zealot. To have a

publican, hated as the whole class was, among the apostles, was

apparently to invite the hostility and contempt of the great majority

of the nation, and especially of those who were strongly national in

feeling. On the other hand, to invite one who was known as a Zealot, a

radical and revolutionist in politics, a man who had identified

himself with the wildest schemes for the overthrow of the Government,

was to provoke the opposition of all the law-abiding and peace-loving

people of the time. Yet how could the heavenly King have more

effectually shown that His kingdom was not of this world, that the

petty party spirit of the day had no place in it whatever, that it

mattered not what a man had been, if now he was renewed in the spirit

of his mind, and consecrated in heart and soul and life to do the will

of God and serve his Master Christ?[9]

So it has come to pass that, though these twelve men had nothing at

all to recommend them to the favour of the world, and though there was

very much from every worldly point of view to create the strongest

prejudices against them and to militate against their influence, yet

they have, by the grace of their Divine Master, so triumphed over all,

that when we think of them now, it is not as fishermen, nor as

publican or Zealot--even the traitor has simply dropped out of

sight--we see before us only "the glorious company of the apostles"!

II.--THE COMMISSION (x. 5-42).

"These twelve Jesus sent forth" (in pairs, as we learn elsewhere, and

as is indicated here, perhaps, by the grouping in the list), "and

charged them." This leads us to look at their commission. It begins

with a limitation, which, however, was only to be temporary. The time

had not yet come for the opening of the door to the Gentiles. Besides

this, we must remember that the Saviour's heart was yearning over His

own people. This appears in the tender way He speaks of them as "the

lost sheep of the house of Israel." Moreover, the apostles were by no

means ready, with all their national prejudices still rank in them, to

be entrusted with so delicate and difficult a duty as getting into

communication with an alien race. Accordingly their field is strictly

limited to their own countrymen.

There seems to have been a limitation also in their message. They had

themselves been to some extent instructed in regard to the nature of

the kingdom, its blessedness, its righteousness, its leading

principles and features; but, though they may have begun to get some

glimpse of the truth in regard to these great matters, they certainly

had not yet made it their own; accordingly they are given, as the

substance of their preaching, only the simple announcement, with which

the Baptist had begun his ministry, and with which Christ also

commenced His: "The kingdom of heaven is at hand." Though there seems

to have been a limitation on the teaching side, there was none on the

side of healing, for their Lord empowers them to do the very same

things for the relief of their suffering fellow-countrymen as they had

seen Himself doing. We have already seen how much teaching there was

in these signs of the kingdom; and we can well believe that it was far

better, considering the stage of advancement the apostles had reached,

that reliance should be placed on the light such deeds of mercy would

necessarily throw on the nature of the kingdom, than on any exposition

which, apart from their Master, they could at that time have been able

to give. Above all it is to be clear that the privileges of the

kingdom are free to all; its blessings are to be dispensed without

money and without price: "Freely ye have received, freely give."

How, then, were they to be supported? About this they were to give

themselves no concern. They were now to put in practice the great

command, "Seek ye first the kingdom of God, and His righteousness,"

relying on the promise, "all these things shall be added unto you."

But in no miraculous way are they to look for the provision of their

wants. They are to be maintained by those among whom and for whom they

labour. This was to be no burden, but a privilege, reserved for those

who were found "worthy" (ver. 11). Nor was it to be divided among as

many as possible. They were to stay on with the same person who first

received them, as the one whom the Master had chosen for the honour;

while, if any refused to recognise it as a privilege, there was to be

no weak solicitation, but a dignified withdrawal. The regulations

throughout are manifestly intended to keep most vividly before their

minds that they went not in their own names, nor on their own

strength, nor at their own charges,--that they were ambassadors of a

King, clothed with His authority, armed with His power, vested with

His rights; so that there is a manifest appropriateness in the solemn

words with which this part of the commission closes: "Verily I say

unto you, It shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and

Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city" which rejects you

(ver. 15).

The part of the charge which follows, and which the limitation of our

plan will not allow us to illustrate point by point, bears not so much

on the work more immediately before them as on the whole work of their

apostolate. It may have been spoken, as some suppose, later on, and

only put here as germane to the occasion; for, as we have seen, the

arrangement of this gospel is not chronological, but is largely

topical. Still there seems no very strong reason for supposing that

the entire discourse was not spoken at this very time; for why should

not the apostles in the very beginning of their way have some idea of

what it would cost them to accept the work to which they were now

called?

The leading thoughts are these: They must expect to be exposed to

trial and suffering in the prosecution of their mission. The Master

Himself was sorely tried, and the servant must not expect exemption.

He is not indeed to court trials, or to submit to persecutions which

are not inevitable: "When they persecute you in this city, flee ye

into another." On the other hand, when the path of duty lies evidently

through trial or danger, he must not shirk it, but face it boldly; and

in all emergencies he is to place implicit confidence in Him Whose

servant he is: "When they deliver you up, be not anxious how or what

ye shall speak: for it shall be given you in that hour what ye shall

speak" (R.V.). "The very hairs of your head are all numbered. Fear ye

not, therefore." There is no way of avoiding the cross; and they would

be quite unworthy of their Master should they seek to avoid it. Yet

there is a great reward for those who bravely take it up and patiently

bear it to the end. It is the way to higher honour (ver. 32), and to

the only life that is worthy of the name (ver. 39); while to turn away

from it is to choose a path which leads to shame (ver. 33) and death

(ver. 39).

The passage, taken up, as so much of it has been, with the

anticipations of ill-treatment which the apostles will receive in

setting out as sheep in the midst of wolves, closes most appropriately

and beautifully with a series of blessings on those who will treat

them well, ending with the encouraging assurance that even a cup of

cold water given to a thirsty disciple will not be forgotten of God.

* * * * *

The lessons on Christian work with which this passage abounds are so

numerous that it would be vain to attempt to unfold them. It is not

merely a record of facts; it is an embodiment of great principles

which are to govern the disciples of Christ in their service to the

end of the world. If only the Church as a whole were to think and pray

as Christ taught His disciples to think and pray before this great

event; and then if the labourers whom God has sent, or would, in

answer to the prayers of the Church, immediately send, into His

harvest were to act--not necessarily according to the letter, but in

every part according to the spirit of these instructions,--using their

own faculties with all the wisdom of the serpent, and trusting to

Divine grace and power with all the simplicity of the dove--it would

not be long before all the scattered sheep were gathered into the

fold, all the ripe sheaves garnered for the Lord of the harvest!

[9] It is interesting to notice that, though Matthew here calls himself

Matthew the publican, no one else does. To others the publican

is lost in the apostle--it is only himself who will not forget the hole

of the pit whence he was digged.

Expositor's Bible: The Gospel of Matthew · 第 31 / 56 题